Anti-inflammatory efficacy of low-dose cyclosporin A in psoriatic arthritis. A prospective multicentre study

Management of psoriasis in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: From the Medical Board of the National Psoriasis Foundation

BACKGROUND

There is a significant association between psoriasis and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Many treatments for psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis are also used for IBD.

OBJECTIVE

To assess therapeutic options for patients with psoriasis and concurrent IBD.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed for clinical studies of biologic and systemic psoriasis medications in psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, ulcerative colitis, and Crohn's disease, for the period from January 1, 1947, to February 14, 2017. Randomized, controlled, double-blinded studies were selected if available. If not, the next highest level of available evidence was selected.

RESULTS

Of the 2282 articles identified, 132 were selected. Infliximab and adalimumab have demonstrated efficacy in psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, ulcerative; colitis, and Crohn's disease. Ustekinumab has demonstrated efficacy in psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, and Crohn's disease. Certolizumab has demonstrated efficacy in psoriatic arthritis and Crohn's disease. Etanercept, secukinumab, brodalumab, and ixekizumab have demonstrated efficacy in psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis but may exacerbate or induce IBD. Guselkumab has demonstrated efficacy in psoriasis.

LIMITATIONS

There are no known clinical trials of treatment specifically for concurrent psoriasis and IBD.

CONCLUSIONS

Infliximab and adalimumab have demonstrated efficacy in psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, ulcerative colitis, and Crohn's disease; other agents have demonstrated efficacy for some, but not all, of these indications.

Psoriasis: Which therapy for which patient: Psoriasis comorbidities and preferred systemic agents

Psoriasis is a systemic inflammatory disease associated with increased risk of comorbidities, such as psoriatic arthritis, Crohn's disease, malignancy, obesity, and cardiovascular diseases. These factors have a significant impact on the decision to use one therapy over another. The past decade has seen a paradigm shift in our understanding of the pathogenesis of psoriasis that has led to identification of new therapeutic targets. Several new drugs have gained approval by the US Food and Drug Administration, expanding the psoriasis armamentarium, but still a large number of patients continue to be untreated or undertreated. Treatment regimens for psoriasis patients should be tailored to meet the specific needs based on disease severity, the impact on quality of life, the response to previous therapies, and the presence of comorbidities. The first article in this continuing medical education series focuses on specific comorbidities and provides insights to choose appropriate systemic treatment in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis.

The Use of Cyclosporine A in Rheumatology: a 2016 Comprehensive Review

Cyclosporine A, an inhibitor of calcineurin, exerts an immunomodulator action interfering with T cell activation. Even though novel therapeutic tools have emerged, CyA still represents a suitable option in several clinical rheumatology settings. This is the case of refractory nephritis and cytopenias associated with systemic lupus erythematosus. Furthermore, CyA is a valued therapeutic tool in the management of uveitis and thrombophlebitis in course of Behçet's disease. Topical CyA has been proven to be beneficial in the dry eye of Sjogren's syndrome, whereas oral treatment with CyA can be considered for the severe complications of adult onset Still's disease. CyA provides a therapeutic option in psoriatic arthritis, being rather effective in skin disease. CyA is currently regarded as a second-line option for patients with inflammatory myopathies refractory to standard regimen. CyA is used even in paediatric rheumatology, in particular in the management of juvenile dermatomyositis and macrophage activation syndrome associated with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Importantly, CyA has been shown to suppress the replication of HCV, and it can thus be safely prescribed to those patients with chronic hepatitis C. Noteworthy, CyA can be administered throughout the gestation course. Surely, caution should be paid to CyA safety profile, in particular to its nephrotoxicity. Even though most evidence comes from small and uncontrolled studies with few randomised controlled trials, CyA should be still regarded as a valid therapeutic tool in 2016 rheumatology.

Managing patients with psoriatic disease: the diagnosis and pharmacologic treatment of psoriatic arthritis in patients with psoriasis

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic, systemic inflammatory disease. Up to 40 % of patients with psoriasis will go on to develop PsA, usually within 5-10 years of cutaneous disease onset. Both conditions share common pathogenic mechanisms involving genetic and environmental factors. Because psoriasis is typically present for years before PsA-related joint symptoms emerge, dermatologists are in a unique position to detect PsA earlier in the disease process through regular, routine screening of psoriasis patients. Distinguishing clinical features of PsA include co-occurrence of psoriatic skin lesions and nail dystrophy, as well as dactylitis and enthesitis. Patients with PsA are usually seronegative for rheumatoid factor, and radiographs may reveal unique features such as juxta-articular new bone formation and pencil-in-cup deformity. Early treatment of PsA with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs has the potential to slow disease progression and maintain patient quality of life. Optimally, a single therapeutic agent will control both the skin and joint psoriatic symptoms. A number of traditional treatments used to manage psoriasis, such as methotrexate and cyclosporine, are also effective for PsA, but these agents are often inadequately effective, temporary in benefit and associated with significant safety concerns. Biologic anti-tumour necrosis factor agents, such as etanercept, infliximab and adalimumab, are effective for treating patients who have both psoriasis and PsA. However, a substantial number of patients may lose efficacy, have adverse effects or find intravenous or subcutaneous administration inconvenient. Emerging oral treatments, including phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitors, such as apremilast, and new biologics targeting interleukin-17, such as secukinumab, brodalumab and ixekizumab, have shown encouraging clinical results in the treatment of psoriasis and/or PsA. Active and regular collaboration of dermatologists with rheumatologists in managing patients who have psoriasis and PsA is likely to yield more optimal control of psoriatic dermal and joint symptoms, and improve long-term patient outcomes.

The use of cyclosporine in dermatology: part I

Cyclosporine is a calcineurin inhibitor that acts selectively on T cells. It has been used in dermatology since 1997 for its US Food and Drug Administration indication of psoriasis and off-label for various other inflammatory skin conditions, including atopic dermatitis, blistering disorders, and connective tissue diseases. In the last decade, many dermatologists have hesitated to use this important drug in their clinical practices because of its toxicity profile. The purpose of this article is to review the mechanism of action of cyclosporine and its current uses and dosing schedules. It is our goal to create a framework in which dermatologists feel comfortable and safe incorporating cyclosporine into their prescribing regimens.

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

After completing this learning activity, participants should be able to describe the mechanism of action of cyclosporine, recognize the potential role of cyclosporine in dermatology and the evidence to support this role, and incorporate cyclosporine into his or her prescribing regimens.

Cyclosporine and psoriasis: 2008 National Psoriasis Foundation Consensus Conference

BACKGROUND

Cyclosporine is a valuable option for the treatment of psoriasis. This report summarizes studies regarding the use of cyclosporine since the last guidelines were published in 1998.

OBJECTIVE

A task force of the National Psoriasis Foundation Medical Board was convened to evaluate treatment options. Our aim was to achieve a consensus on new updated guidelines for the use of cyclosporine in the treatment of psoriasis.

METHODS

Reports in the literature were reviewed regarding cyclosporine therapy.

LIMITATIONS

There are few evidence-based studies on the treatment of psoriasis with cyclosporine.

RESULTS

A consensus was achieved on the use of cyclosporine in psoriasis including specific recommendations on dosing, monitoring, and use of cyclosporine in special situations. The consensus received approval from members of the National Psoriasis Foundation Medical Board.

CONCLUSIONS

Cyclosporine is a safe and effective drug for the treatment of psoriasis. It has a particularly useful role in managing psoriatic crises, treating psoriasis unresponsive to other modalities, bridging to other therapies, and treating psoriasis within a rotational scheme of other medications. Appropriate patient selection and monitoring will significantly decrease the risks of side effects.

Guidelines of care for the management of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: section 4. Guidelines of care for the management and treatment of psoriasis with traditional systemic agents

Psoriasis is a common, chronic, inflammatory, multisystem disease with predominantly skin and joint manifestations affecting approximately 2% of the population. In this fourth of 6 sections of the guidelines of care for psoriasis, we discuss the use of traditional systemic medications for the treatment of patients with psoriasis. Treatment should be tailored to meet individual patients' needs. We will discuss in detail the efficacy and safety, and offer recommendations for the use of the 3 most commonly used, and approved, traditional systemic agents: methotrexate, cyclosporine, and acitretin. We will also briefly discuss the available data for the use of azathioprine, fumaric acid esters, hydroxyurea, leflunomide, mycophenolate mofetil, sulfasalazine, tacrolimus, and 6-thioguanine in psoriasis.

Psoriatic Arthritis: A Review

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a seronegative inflammatory spondyloarthropathy occurring in individuals with psoriasis. Psoriasis precedes joint disease in approximately 80% of PsA cases. The clinical course of PsA varies from mild arthritis to a severe, debilitating erosive arthropathy that affects functional capacity and quality of life of patients. The incidence of PsA is gender neutral, but a significant genetic component exists. Hallmark clinical features include dystrophic nail changes in the fingers or toes, dactylitis, and enthesitis. Many drugs indicated for use in rheumatoid arthritis have been found useful in the treatment of PsA, suggesting a similar immune-mediated etiology. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and intraarticular corticosteroids are often sufficient to manage mild PsA. Moderate to severe forms of the disease require the initiation of disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs. Failure of two disease modifying antirheumatic drugs justifies the initiation of biologic therapy with tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors.

The treatment of psoriatic arthritis

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic, autoimmune, seronegative inflammatory arthritis characterized by varying degrees of axial and peripheral arthritis. Here, we review the literature on the pharmacological management of PsA and present a simple treatment algorithm based on the available information. Although PsA management must be individualized to the degree and type of joint pain and inflammation, in general, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) still represent first-line treatment of mild PsA. Second-line therapy includes older agents such as gold salts, methotrexate, sulfasalazine, and cyclosporine. The tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) antagonists represent the most recent major advance in the clinical management of PsA.

The Use of Systemic Immune Moderators in Dermatology: An Update

In addition to corticosteroids, dermatologists have access to an array of immunomodulatory therapies. Azathioprine, cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, cyclosporine, and mycophenolate mofetil are the systemic immunosuppressive agents most commonly used by dermatologists. In addition, new developments in biotechnology have spurred the development of immunobiologic agents that are able to target the immunologic process of many inflammatory disorders at specific points along the inflammatory cascade. Alefacept, efalizumab, etanercept, and infliximab are the immunobiologic agents that are currently the most well known and most commonly used by dermatologists. This article reviews the pharmacology, mechanism of action, side effects, and clinical applications of these therapies.

Psoriatic arthritis: prevalence, diagnosis, and review of therapy for the dermatologist

Psoriatic arthritis is an inflammatory arthritis that is commonly associated with psoriasis. While traditionally viewed as being a benign disease, recent evidence indicates the potential for a significant amount of morbidity and disability, making early recognition and intervention important. Treatment includes both traditional immunomodulatory agents as well as the recently available biologic response modifiers.

Diagnosis and management of psoriatic arthritis

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is considered to be one of the spondyloarthritides, and as such has both spinal and peripheral joint involvement. In 80% of patients, psoriasis usually precedes the development of arthritis. Although there are no widely accepted diagnostic criteria, a number of distinct clinical features allow it to be distinguished from other forms of inflammatory arthritis. It affects both sexes equally, and the pattern of joint involvement is characteristic with distal interphalangeal joint involvement, asymmetry, dactylitis, flail or ankylotic deformities of digits, and the frequent presence of enthesitis and spinal involvement. It may have a pattern of joint involvement similar to rheumatoid arthritis (RA) but in these patients rheumatoid factor and the other systemic features of RA are usually absent. Radiographs frequently reveal evidence of asymmetric sacroiliitis and spinal disease, and peripheral joints, as well as showing erosions, may also demonstrate profuse new bone formation and ankylosis. Profound osteolysis producing the pencil-in-cup deformity can also occur in the same individual. It is now recognised that PsA can be a destructive arthritis with an increased morbidity and mortality. Studies of standard disease-modifying therapies have been small and frequently inconclusive because of a high placebo response rate. This may be as a result of heterogeneity in patient selection, poor assessment tools, or the difference in underlying pathogenesis and subsequent response to therapy. In meta-analyses, sulfasalazine and methotrexate have been shown to be effective. Treating the skin alone seems to have little impact on joint disease, and the relationship between skin and joints is still unclear. However, recent studies with anti-tumour necrosis factor agents, such as etanercept and infliximab, have shown considerable significant clinical benefit and provided the hope that we will at last have effective therapies for this disease.

Immunomodulating drugs in the management of psoriatic arthritis

Psoriatic arthritis is a chronic inflammatory arthropathy which can be distinguished from rheumatoid arthritis on the basis of differing patient demographics, genetic predisposition, histopathologic change, radiographic appearance, and clinical course. The cause of psoriatic arthritis remains unknown but appears to be autoimmune in nature as its pathogenesis is characterized by persistent synovial inflammation resulting in damage to the articular cartilage and osteolysis. Compared with rheumatoid arthritis, distinct lymphocyte subpopulations and pro-inflammatory cytokine levels appear to be present within the joint but the importance and therapeutic implications of these differences is uncertain. The clinical presentation of psoriatic arthritis is variable and overlapping patterns of joint involvement affecting both the appendicular and axial skeleton are seen. For patients with mild synovial disease and a favorable prognosis, the use of a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug for symptomatic relief is often sufficient. However, the destructive potential of psoriatic arthritis is increasingly recognized and patients with more synovial disease and radiographic change at presentation appear to be at risk for greater morbidity and increased mortality. Immunomodulating therapy has the potential to suppress joint inflammation and preserve functional capacity but true disease modification has yet to be shown. The toxicity associated with presently available immunomodulatory agents makes careful patient selection and conscientious monitoring essential. The efficacy of methotrexate and sulfasalazine in patients with psoriatic arthritis is well defined while more anecdotal reports of benefit exist for other agents including the antimalarials, azathioprine, colchicine, cyclosporine, and the retinoids. For all treatment regimens, the magnitude of clinical improvement demonstrated to date has been rather small and quite subjective in character with few controlled studies of adequate size and duration having been reported. Emerging biologic therapies, such as those which target tumor necrosis factor, will hopefully provide future treatment options with greater efficacy and improved safety for patients with psoriatic arthritis.

Use of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in patients with psoriatic arthritis

Few prospective placebo-controlled studies have evaluated disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in the treatment of peripheral psoriatic arthritis.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate second-line treatments used in clinical practice in patients with psoriatic arthritis.

METHOD

We studied a cross-section of 100 consecutive patients seen by hospital-based or office-based rheumatologists for psoriatic arthritis.

PATIENTS

The 55 men and 45 women had a mean age of 48 years (range, 17-79 years) and a mean disease duration of 7 years (range, 1-24 years).

RESULTS

The most commonly used DMARDs were sulfasalazine, gold, methotrexate, and hydroxychloroquine (64, 43, 41 et 17 patients, respectively). These drugs had been stopped because of inefficacy in 31%, 31%, 12%, and 53% of patients, respectively, and because of adverse events in 23%, 44%, 22%, and 41% of patients, respectively. At the time of the study, mean treatment durations were 15, 21, 34, and 12 months, respectively, and the drugs were still being used in 45%, 21%, 66%, and 6% of patients.

CONCLUSION

Our data confirm the value of methotrexate and salazopyrine. Methotrexate had the best risk/benefit ratio. Gold was often responsible for side effects. Hydroxychloroquine was inadequately effective and poorly tolerated.

Drug delivery systems for cyclosporine: achievements and complications

The review deals with the preparation, properties, and analysis of different kinds of cyclosporine delivery systems, such as solid formulations, liposomes, emulsions and microemulsions and targeted cyclosporine formulations. The review points out a key role of delivery systems in increasing the therapeutic effectiveness of cyclosporine. Comparative studies of the prior marketed formulation, Sandimmune, with a new microemulsion formulation, Neoral, are discussed including some data on clinical development of Neoral.

Inhibition of calcineurin by the tyrphostin class of tyrosine kinase inhibitors

Because of their similarity to tyrosine, members of the tyrphostin family of tyrosine kinase inhibitors were tested as possible inhibitors of the protein serine/threonine phosphatase calcineurin. Calcineurin was inhibited by tyrphostins A8 (also designated AG10), A23 (AG18), and A48 (AG112) with p-nitrophenyl phosphate as substrate. The IC50 values estimated with this substrate were 21, 62, and 30 microM for A8, A23, and A48, respectively. Two other tyrphostins, A46 (AG99) and A63 (AG13), did not inhibit calcineurin at concentrations up to 200 microM. Similar inhibition was observed with tyrphostins A8 and A23 using a phosphopeptide substrate (1.0 mM). Tyrphostin A8 showed competitive inhibition against p-nitrophenyl phosphate as the substrate, with an inhibition constant of 18 microM, comparable to the IC50 value. Possible chemical and structural features influencing inhibition are discussed based on a comparison of the structures of the tyrphostins tested.

Immunosuppressive agents in dermatology. An update

Azathioprine, cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and cyclosporine are the immunosuppressive agents most commonly used by dermatologists. Azathioprine has a relatively good safety profile and is therefore often preferred for the treatment of chronic eczematous dermatitides and bullous disorders. Awareness of the role of genetic polymorphisms in its metabolism can increase the efficacy and safety of this drug. Cyclophosphamide is an antimetabolite that has a more rapid onset of immunosuppressive effect than azathioprine, but has significant short-term and long-term toxicity. It is of use in fulminant, life-threatening cutaneous disease. Methotrexate is an antimetabolite that has significant anti-inflammatory activity. Despite its hepatotoxicity, its role in inflammatory dermatoses is broadening. Likewise, the role of cyclosporine is being expanded. This drug has potent T-cell inhibitory effects secondary to interference with intracellular signal transduction. Given the evidence for cumulative renal toxicity, it currently has a role in the short-term treatment of refractory psoriasis and atopic dermatitis, as well as in select inflammatory dermatoses. Familiarity with disease-specific clinical efficacy, side-effect profile, and dosage allows the successful and judicious use of these drugs in dermatologic disorders.

Therapy with cyclosporine in psoriatic arthritis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of cyclosporin A (CsA) in the treatment of patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA).

METHODS

We reviewed the literature dealing with CsA treatment of PsA.

RESULTS

In the 1980s, some studies evaluating CsA in severe cases of psoriasis documented an improvement in the associated arthritis. Subsequently, open prospective studies included patients with active peripheral arthritis. Using initial CsA dose of 3 to 6 mg/kg/day, improvement in the clinical parameters was noted. A controlled trial showed that CsA and methotrexate (MTX) are equally effective treatment for PsA. CsA and MTX combination was effective in PsA patients resistant to previous second-line therapy. No studies have evaluated the efficacy of CsA on axial disease and on the progression of radiological damage. The most important side effect was nephrotoxicity. However, of 170 CsA-treated patients in 16 studies, only 10 (6%) discontinued the drug because of renal side effects.

CONCLUSIONS

CsA seems to be an effective and safe therapy for PsA. However, controlled studies on large number of patients are necessary.