Oral retinoids--efficacy and toxicity in psoriasis

Topical application of imatinib mesylate ameliorated psoriasis-like skin lesions in imiquimod-induced murine model via angiogenesis inhibition

Psoriasis is a chronic skin disorder characterized by a skin rash with scaly patches. Microvascular abnormalities are a characteristic feature of psoriasis and play a crucial role in the pathogenesis of psoriatic lesions. Angiogenic factors are upregulated in psoriatic skin lesions and are thought to induce angiogenesis. Platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) induces vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and PDGF is upregulated in keratinocytes in psoriatic skin lesions. The present study aimed to investigate the effect of topical imatinib mesylate (IMT) in inhibiting the activation of PDGF signalling in the pathogenesis of psoriasis. When topically applied to the skin of mice with imiquimod (IMQ)-induced psoriasis, IMT ameliorated skin symptoms similar to those of human psoriasis. Hyperproliferation of keratinocytes, hyperkeratosis, inflammatory cell infiltration and hypervascularity were histologically suppressed by topical IMT. The expression of angiogenic factors including fibroblast growth factor (FGF) and VEGF was decreased. The expression of FGF and VEGF in a PDGF-stimulated fibroblast cell line was inhibited by IMT. PDGF is required for the signalling pathway producing angiogenic factors in fibroblast. Thus, topically applied IMT inhibits PDGFR activation in fibroblast and suppresses the production of angiogenic factors, thereby mitigating the symptoms of psoriasis. The inhibitory effect of IMT on angiogenesis suggests that topical application IMT may be a viable treatment option for psoriasis.

Repurposing approved therapeutics for new indication: Addressing unmet needs in psoriasis treatment

Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory autoimmune condition manifested by the hyperproliferation of keratinocytes with buildup of inflammatory red patches and scales on skin surfaces. The available treatment options for the management of psoriasis have various drawbacks, and the clinical need for effective therapeutics for this disease remain unmet; therefore, the approaches of drug repurposing or drug repositioning could potentially be used for treating indications of psoriasis. The undiscovered potential of drug repurposing or repositioning compensates for the limitations and hurdles in drug discovery and drug development processes. Drugs initially approved for other indications, including anticancer, antidiabetic, antihypertensive, and anti-arthritic activities, are being investigated for their potential in psoriasis management as a new therapeutic indication by using repurposing strategies. This article envisages the potential of various therapeutics for the management of psoriasis.

•

Psoriasis is an autoimmune inflammatory skin disorder with complex physiology.

•

Conventional treatments for psoriasis cause severe adverse effects; therefore an unmet need remains for safer and more effective therapies for psoriasis.

•

Various drugs that effectively decrease the inflammation and proliferation of skin cells can be repurposed for the management of psoriasis.

•

Repurposed drugs provide various incentives to the pharmaceutical industry.

Tolerance and efficacy of a new celastrol-containing balm as adjunct care in psoriasis

BACKGROUND

In patients with psoriasis, the non-lesional skin also presents abnormalities, requiring emollient application on the whole body.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the tolerance of a new emollient balm containing celastrol, an active ingredient with anti-Th17 immunomodulatory properties used alone or in association with topical or systemic drug treatments or phototherapy, and its efficacy when used alone.

METHODS

Adults with body plaque psoriasis applied the product over the whole body once a day for 4 weeks (balm used alone in 41 patients and with ongoing treatment in 50 patients). At D1, D8 ('balm alone' study) or D15 ('balm in association' study) and D29, the dermatologist rated physical and functional signs and assessed pruritus and body global lesion score (evaluating erythema, induration/thickness, scaling and dryness) in the 'balm alone' study.

RESULTS

No reaction related to the product was reported, and the tolerance was deemed excellent. In the 'balm alone' study, mean pruritus intensity score significantly decreased at D8 (-39%, P < 0.001) and D29 (-60%, P < 0.001) compared with D1, together with the body global lesion score (-24% at D8 and -26% at D29, P < 0.001). In parallel, quality of life improved, as evidenced by a patient-reported outcome questionnaire. Cosmetic acceptability was good.

CONCLUSION

This new emollient balm was very well tolerated by patients with body plaque psoriasis either alone or in association with drug treatment or phototherapy, which is important to ensure long-term compliance. Daily application during one month improved pruritus, physical signs and quality of life.

Long-term Safety of Oral Systemic Therapies for Psoriasis: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature

Oral systemic therapies are important treatment options for patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis, either as monotherapy or in therapy-recalcitrant cases as combination therapy with phototherapy, other oral systemics or biologics. Long-term treatment is needed to maintain sufficient disease control in psoriasis, but continuous use of systemic treatments is limited by adverse events (AEs) and cumulative toxicity risks. The primary aim of this comprehensive literature review was to examine the long-term safety profiles of oral agents commonly used in the treatment of adults with psoriasis. Searches were conducted in EMBASE and PubMed up to November 2018, and 157 relevant publications were included. Long-term treatment with acitretin could be associated with skeletal toxicity and hepatotoxicity, although evidence for skeletal toxicity is mixed and hepatotoxicity is rare, particularly at low doses. Other safety issues include hyperlipidaemia and potential for teratogenicity up to 2-3 years after discontinuation of treatment. There is a paucity of data on long-term treatment with apremilast. Continued exposure to apremilast does not seem to increase the incidence of common AEs, such as gastrointestinal (GI) AEs, upper respiratory tract infections and headache, while the long-term risks for depression, suicidal thoughts and weight loss are unknown. Long-term ciclosporin treatment is associated with renal toxicity, hypertension, non-melanoma skin cancer, neurological AEs and GI AEs. Long-term methotrexate treatment is associated with hepatotoxicity, GI AEs, haematological toxicity, renal toxicity and alopecia. Finally, long-term treatment with fumaric acid esters (FAE) is associated with GI AEs, flushing, lymphocytopenia, proteinuria and elevated liver enzymes. Median drug survival estimates varied considerably: ~  2.9-9.7 months for apremilast; ~ 5.4 months for ciclosporin; ~ 8.6 months for acitretin; ~ 12.1-21.6 months for methotrexate; and ~  54.8 months for FAE. These long-term safety profiles may help to guide clinicians to select the optimal oral systemic treatment for the long-term treatment of psoriasis in adults.

Acitretin Use in Dermatology

BACKGROUND

Acitretin has been used for the treatment of severe psoriasis for over 20 years.

OBJECTIVE

The current project was conceived to optimise patient care by recognising the role acitretin can play in the treatment of patients with psoriasis and those with other disorders of keratinisation.

METHODS

A literature review was conducted to explore the role of acitretin and to assess its value for dermatologic disorders other than severe psoriasis. A panel of Canadian dermatologists developed a clinical pathway using a case-based approach, focusing on specific patient features.

RESULTS

The clinical pathway covers plaque psoriasis with hyperkeratotic plantar disease, palmoplantar pustulosis, hyperkeratotic hand dermatitis, lichen planus, lamellar ichthyosis, and hidradenitis suppurativa.

CONCLUSION

The recommendations in our clinical pathway reflect the current use of acitretin in Canada for severe psoriasis and other disorders of keratinisation.

Current knowledge on psoriasis and autoimmune diseases

Psoriasis is a prevalent, chronic inflammatory disease of the skin, mediated by crosstalk between epidermal keratinocytes, dermal vascular cells, and immunocytes such as antigen presenting cells (APCs) and T cells. Exclusive cellular “responsibility” for the induction and maintenance of psoriatic plaques has not been clearly defined. Increased proliferation of keratinocytes and endothelial cells in conjunction with APC/T cell/monocyte/macrophage inflammation leads to the distinct epidermal and vascular hyperplasia that is characteristic of lesional psoriatic skin. Despite the identification of numerous susceptibility loci, no single genetic determinant has been identified as responsible for the induction of psoriasis. Thus, numerous other triggers of disease, such as environmental, microbial and complex cellular interactions must also be considered as participants in the development of this multifactorial disease. Recent advances in therapeutics, especially systemic so-called “biologics” have provided new hope for identifying the critical cellular targets that drive psoriasis pathogenesis. Recent recognition of the numerous co-morbidities and other autoimmune disorders associated with psoriasis, including inflammatory bowel disease, multiple sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis, and systemic lupus erythematosus suggest common signaling elements and cellular mediators may direct disease pathogenesis. In this review, we discuss common cellular pathways and participants that mediate psoriasis and other autoimmune disorders that share these cellular signaling pathways.

Psoriasis treatment: Unconventional and non-standard modalities in the era of biologics

Psoriasis is a potentially debilitating inflammatory dermatosis affecting 0.2%-4.8% of the population worldwide causing a significant occupational, personal or psychosocial morbidity to these patients for life. The basic aim of psoriasis therapy is to control the disease to maximum possible extent and improve the patient’s quality of life. Management of triggers for flare-ups, lifestyle modifications, and dietary supplements are often recommended. Intermittent or rotational therapy with frequent alterations in treatment options is usually needed to reduce toxicity of anti-psoriatic drugs in the absence of safer alternatives. Currently, several biological agents categorized as either T-cell targeted (e.g., Alefacept, Efalizumab) or cytokine modulating (e.g., Adalimumab, Infliximab, Etanercept) are available for treating severe psoriasis. However, their high cost is often precluding for most patients. The usefulness of systemic (methotrexate, cyclosporine, acitretin or several other therapeutic agents) or topical (tar, anthralin, corticosteroids or calcipotriol ointments, phototherapy with or without psoralens) therapies has been well established for the management of psoriasis. The literature is also replete with benefits of less used non-standard and unconventional treatment modalities (hydroxycarbamide, azathioprine, leflunomide, mycophenolate mofetil, isotretinoin, fumarates, topical calcineurin inhibitors, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors agonists, statins, sulfasalazine, pentoxifylline, colchicine, grenz ray therapy, excimer laser, climatotherapy and balneophototherapy, peritoneal dialysis, tonsillectomy, ichthyotherapy, etc.). These can be used alternatively to treat psoriasis patients who have mild/minimal lesions, are intolerant to conventional drugs, have developed side effects or achieved recommended cumulative dose, where comorbidities pose unusual therapeutic challenges, or may be as intermittent, rotational or combination treatment alternatives.

Peretinoin after curative therapy of hepatitis C-related hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study

BACKGROUND

Effective prophylactic therapies have not been established for hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence. Peretinoin represents one novel option for patients with hepatitis C virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCV-HCC), and it was tested in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

METHODS

Patients with curative therapy were assigned to one of the following regimens: peretinoin 600, 300 mg/day, or placebo for up to 96 weeks. The primary outcome was recurrence-free survival (RFS).

RESULTS

Of the 401 patients initially enrolled, 377 patients were analyzed for efficacy. The RFS rates in the 600-mg group, the 300-mg group, and the placebo group were 71.9, 63.6, and 66.0 % at 1 year, and 43.7, 24.9, and 29.3 % at 3 years, respectively. The primary comparison of peretinoin (300 and 600-mg) with placebo was not significant (P = 0.434). The dose-response relationship based on the hypothesis that "efficacy begins to increase at 600 mg/day" was significant (P = 0.023, multiplicity-adjusted P = 0.048). The hazard ratios for RFS in the 600-mg group vs. the placebo group were 0.73 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.51-1.03] for the entire study period and 0.27 (95 % CI 0.07-0.96) after 2 years of the randomization. Common adverse events included ascites, increased blood pressure, headache, presence of urine albumin, and increased transaminases.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the superiority of peretinoin to placebo could not be validated, 600 mg/day was shown to be the optimal dose, and treatment may possibly reduce the recurrence of HCV-HCC, particularly after 2 years. The efficacy and safety of peretinoin 600 mg/day should continue to be evaluated in further studies.

Pars plana Ahmed valve and vitrectomy in patients with glaucoma associated with posterior segment disease

PURPOSE

To assess the safety and efficacy of a modified technique for pars plana placement of the Ahmed valve in combination with pars plana vitrectomy in the treatment of glaucoma associated with posterior segment disease.

METHODS

Thirty-nine eyes with glaucoma associated with posterior segment disease underwent pars plana vitrectomy combined with Ahmed valve placement. All valves were placed in the pars plana using a modified technique, without the pars plana clip, and using a scleral patch graft.

RESULTS

The 24 eyes diagnosed with neovascular glaucoma had an improvement in intraocular pressure from 37.6 mmHg to 13.8 mmHg and best-corrected visual acuity from 2.13 logarithm of minimum angle of resolution to 1.40 logarithm of minimum angle of resolution. Fifteen eyes diagnosed with steroid-induced glaucoma had an improvement in intraocular pressure from 27.9 mmHg to 14.1 mmHg and best-corrected visual acuity from 1.38 logarithm of minimum angle of resolution to 1.13 logarithm of minimum angle of resolution. Complications included four cases of cystic bleb formation and one case of choroidal detachment and explantation for hypotony.

CONCLUSION

Ahmed valve placement through the pars plana during vitrectomy is an effective option for managing complex cases of glaucoma without the use of the pars plana clip.

From the Medical Board of the National Psoriasis Foundation: The risk of cardiovascular disease in individuals with psoriasis and the potential impact of current therapies

BACKGROUND

Many studies have identified cardiovascular risk factors in patients with psoriasis. Some psoriasis therapies may increase cardiovascular disease (CVD) and others may decrease CVD.

OBJECTIVE

We reviewed the literature to define the impact of common psoriasis therapies on cardiovascular measures and outcomes.

RESULTS

Phototherapy has no major cardiovascular impact and may reduce levels of proinflammatory cytokines. Acitretin increases serum lipids and triglycerides, but has not been shown to increase cardiovascular risk. Cyclosporine A increases blood pressure, serum triglycerides, and total cholesterol. Methotrexate is associated with a decreased risk of CVD morbidity and mortality. Among the biologics, data for tumor necrosis factor inhibitors suggest an overall reduction in cardiovascular events. Most data on short-term ustekinumab use suggest no effect on major adverse cardiovascular events, however some authorities remain concerned. Nevertheless, ustekinumab use over a 4-year period shows a decrease in major adverse cardiovascular events when compared both with the general US population and with psoriatics in Great Britain.

LIMITATIONS

Most studies lack the power and randomization of large clinical trials and long-term follow-up periods. In addition, the increased risk of CVD associated with psoriasis itself is a confounding factor.

CONCLUSION

Some therapies for moderate to severe psoriasis, including methotrexate and tumor necrosis factor inhibitors, may reduce cardiovascular events in psoriatic patients. Ustekinumab appears to be neutral but there may be a long-term benefit. Appropriate patient counseling and selection and clinical follow-up are necessary to maximize safety with these agents. Further long-term study is necessary to quantify the benefits and risks associated with biologic therapies.

Treatment of severe nail psoriasis with acitretin: an impressive therapeutic result

Nail psoriasis is common in adult psoriatic patients. Although several new drugs have recently been introduced for the treatment of skin psoriasis, treatment of nail psoriasis still remains a challenge. Topical treatments (e.g., corticosteroids, tazarotene, 5-fluorouracil, calcipotriol) are the first line in the management of skin psoriasis. The efficacy of these drugs in nail disease, however, is limited, mainly due to the difficulty in penetrating the nail bed and nail matrix. In cases of nail disease resistant to topical treatment, methotrexate, ciclosporin, acitretin, or biological agents can be used. The present authors introduce a 73-year-old patient affected by impressive psoriatic nail disease involving all her fingernails and toenails treated by acitretin, a traditional systemic treatment. After 2 months of treatment there was a marked improvement. The clinical improvement of the nails was progressive and 6 months later it was stable and satisfactory. The remarkable response to treatment in this case suggests that oral acitretin, in association to urea nail lacquer, might be useful in the management of disabling severe nail psoriasis even in absence of severe cutaneous involvement.

Guidelines for the use of acitretin in psoriasis. Psoriasis Group of the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology

Phototherapy, classic systemic treatments (methotrexate, acitretin, and ciclosporin), and biologic agents (etanercept, infliximab, adalimumab, and ustekinumab) constitute a broad therapeutic arsenal that increases the likelihood of achieving control of severe and extensive disease in patients with psoriasis. Acitretin continues to be a very valuable tool in both monotherapy, in which it is combined with other systemic treatments (classic or biologic), and in sequential therapy. Thanks to its lack of a direct immunosuppressive effect and its ability to achieve a long-term response, acitretin has an important role in the treatment of psoriasis, although this has not always been acknowledged in relevant treatment guidelines. We present consensus guidelines for the use of acitretin in psoriasis drawn up by the Psoriasis Group of the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology. These guidelines provide a detailed account of acitretin, including pharmacological properties, indications and contraindications, adverse effects, and factors that should be taken into account to enhance the safe use of this drug. They also propose treatment strategies for use in routine clinical practice. The overall aim of these guidelines is to define the criteria for the use and management of acetretin in psoriasis.

Combination therapy in psoriasis: an evidence-based review

BACKGROUND

Psoriasis is a chronic, systemic, inflammatory condition for which a variety of treatment modalities exist. Combinations of therapies are used often in clinical practice to enhance efficacy and reduce drug toxicities.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this review is to assess the literature on the efficacy and safety of combination therapy in the treatment of psoriasis.

METHODS

MEDLINE was reviewed to identify English-language publications from 1966 to 2011 examining combination therapy in psoriasis. Fifty-three articles met inclusion criteria and were included in this review. Randomized controlled trials addressing various combinations of treatment modalities for psoriasis were included. Data from these clinical studies were summarized and the outcomes were discussed.

RESULTS

Large-scale, randomized controlled trials investigating the use of various combination therapies in psoriasis are limited. The strongest data support the use of combinations of vitamin D derivatives and corticosteroids as topical combinations and, to a lesser extent, the combination of other topical agents. Phototherapy and topical vitamin D derivatives as well as phototherapy in combination with oral retinoids are well supported in the literature. Combinations of systemic medications, though often used clinically, have little data to support their efficacy or safety.

LIMITATIONS

Our data were limited by the small number of clinical trials examining the multiple available combinations that are used in clinical practice.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of combination treatments falls within the standard of care for psoriasis, even if these combinations have not been extensively studied in clinical trials.

Effective and sustainable biologic treatment of psoriasis: what can we learn from new clinical data?

The introduction of the biologic agents, adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab and ustekinumab, has provided more options for the short- and long-term treatment of patients with psoriasis. Physicians are now able to achieve and maintain effective disease control in more patients using biologic therapies. Newly published clinical data support the introduction of novel optimization strategies to further improve outcomes in patients with psoriasis. Recent randomized controlled clinical trials have provided data on the efficacy of conventional therapies, including systemic agents, and biologics at specific time points. Switching from methotrexate to a tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α antagonist after 16 weeks can improve response rates, as demonstrated in a study of patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis, while the benefit of long-term methotrexate use remains unclear. In a separate study, psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) ≥ 75 response rates were maintained over time (>3 years for adalimumab), suggesting that long-term biologic therapy is an effective and sustainable treatment option for psoriasis. For each individual patient, the benefit of a particular treatment needs to be balanced with the risks. The lack of head-to-head trials of antipsoriatic therapies, particularly biologic therapies, does not help with making individualized treatment decisions. However, a benefit-risk assessment of TNF-α antagonists calculated from an integrated analysis of published literature in moderate-to-severe psoriasis can be used to aid clinical practice. The number needed to treat, number needed to harm and number of patient years of observation to detect an adverse event have been determined for adalimumab, etanercept and infliximab. The benefit-risk profiles generated demonstrated that, during the initial year of treatment, likelihood of success with TNF-α antagonists was several orders of magnitude greater than the likelihood of serious toxicity.

Generalized pustular psoriasis in a child: observation of long-term combination therapy with etretinate and calcipotriol for 16 years

Generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) is a rare condition in young children. It is difficult to treat and may require long-term systemic therapy. We report the long-term course of a 3-year-old boy whose onset of psoriasis dated to age 7 months. He was treated with etretinate and psoralen plus ultraviolet A therapy initially and then with etretinate alone, and at age 12, topical calcipotriol was added. At the age of 19, he had been taking oral retinoids for 16 years, with a mean dose of etretinate of 0.22 mg/kg per day, a total amount of approximately 37 g, without evidence of stunted growth, ligamentous calcification, hyperostosis, or hepatic toxicity.

Guidelines of care for the management of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: section 6. Guidelines of care for the treatment of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: case-based presentations and evidence-based conclusions

Psoriasis is a common, chronic, inflammatory, multisystem disease with predominantly skin and joint manifestations affecting approximately 2% of the population. In the first 5 parts of the American Academy of Dermatology Psoriasis Guidelines of Care, we have presented evidence supporting the use of topical treatments, phototherapy, traditional systemic agents, and biological therapies for patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. In this sixth and final section of the Psoriasis Guidelines of Care, we will present cases to illustrate how to practically use these guidelines in specific clinical scenarios. We will describe the approach to treating patients with psoriasis across the entire spectrum of this fascinating disease from mild to moderate to severe, with and without psoriatic arthritis, based on the 5 prior published guidelines. Although specific therapeutic recommendations are given for each of the cases presented, it is important that treatment be tailored to meet individual patients' needs. In addition, we will update the prior 5 guidelines and address gaps in research and care that currently exist, while making suggestions for further studies that could be performed to help address these limitations in our knowledge base.

Single‐center retrospective study of long‐term use of low‐dose acitretin (Soriatane®) for psoriasis

BACKGROUND

Indicated as monotherapy for severe psoriasis in adults, acitretin (Soriatane) can be used in combination therapy or as a 'disease-stabilizing, maintenance' agent. While its efficacy for psoriasis and other disorders of keratinization is well established, its safety is often a concern for many dermatologists. The possible side effects associated with short-term treatment of oral retinoids include mucocutaneous effects, elevation in serum lipid chemistries and liver enzymes, and teratogenicity. However, the only possible long-term, cumulative side effect is skeletal and ligamentous calcification such as hyperostosis. There is a specific syndrome of hyperostosis associated with oral retinoids called DISH (diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis).

OBJECTIVE

To examine the incidence of DISH syndrome in long-term acitretin use for psoriasis and to quantify the incidence of other side effects.

METHODS

All patients seen at the UCSF Psoriasis and Skin Treatment Center who had been on acitretin for more than 1 year were identified.

RESULTS

A chart review of these patients revealed no X-ray-confirmed cases of DISH syndrome, minimal changes in coronary heart disease risk indicators, and extremely rare significant elevation of liver enzymes.

CONCLUSION

Acitretin does not appear to cause significant long-term side effects at low doses; the implications for thousands of patients are that use of this medication can be continued for long periods of time with routine monitoring.

Systemic therapies for psoriasis: methotrexate, retinoids, and cyclosporine

Despite the current use and ongoing development of the biological therapies 'traditional' systemic agents will continue to form a key part of the therapeutic armamentarium for patients with severe psoriasis. Long-term maintenance therapy with retinoids and methotrexate is cost-effective and, for many patients with psoriasis, life changing. Regular monitoring is required for both treatments, particularly methotrexate to prevent significant bone marrow suppression and hepatotoxicity. Ideally, cyclosporine should be used for short courses of 3 to 4 months duration, within which it provides excellent disease control. Close assessment of renal function and blood pressure is essential.

Efalizumab: results of a 3-year continuous dosing study for the long-term control of psoriasis

Background

Efalizumab, a T-cell-targeted, recombinant, humanized, monoclonal IgG1 antibody, inhibits key T-cell-mediated steps in the pathogenesis of psoriasis. Efalizumab is approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis in adults in more than 50 countries.

Objectives

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of long-term, continuous efalizumab therapy in patients with psoriasis.

Methods

This open-label, multicentre phase III study enrolled 339 patients with moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis. During the initial 3-month phase, patients received subcutaneous efalizumab 2 mg kg⁻¹ weekly with randomization to receive concomitant fluocinolone acetonide or placebo ointment during month 3. The second phase was a long-term observational period; patients achieving a ≥ 50% improvement in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score were eligible to receive efalizumab 1 mg kg⁻¹ weekly for up to 33 months. The final 3-month treatment period was an optional transition period for patients who completed the 33-month segment before efalizumab became commercially available.

Results

After 3 months, 41·3% of patients achieved a ≥ 75% improvement in PASI (PASI-75) and 13·0% achieved a ≥ 90% improvement (PASI-90). Continued improvement was observed: 45·4% and 24·5% achieved PASI-75 and PASI-90, respectively, at the end of the observational phase. The safety profile was stable, with no new or no increase in common events over 36 months of treatment.

Conclusions

This was the longest continuous study using a biologic therapy for psoriasis. Clinical benefit of efalizumab improved over the first 18 months and was maintained during 36 months of continuous therapy. Long-term efalizumab therapy is appropriate for many patients with plaque psoriasis.

Conflicts of interest

C.L. with 3M Pharmaceuticals, Abbott, Allergan, Altana, Amgen, Astellas-Biogen, Bristol Myers, Centocor, CombinatoRx, Fujisawa Healthcare, Galderma, Genentech, Merck Serono International SA, Schering Plough, RTL, Vitae and Warner Chilcott; A.M. with 3M Pharmaceuticals, Abbott, Allergan, Allermed, Amgen, Astralis, Berlex, Biogen Idec, Celgene, Centocor, Cephalon, Collagenex Pharmaceuticals, CombinatoRx, Connetics, Corixa, Dermik Laboratories, Doak Dermatologics, Dow, Ferndale Laboratories, Fujisawa Healthcare, Galderma, Genentech, Genzyme, GlaxoSmithKline, Ligand Pharmaceuticals, Medicis, MedImmune, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Otsuka Pharmaceutical, Protein Design Labs, QLT USA, Regeneration Pharma AG, Roche, Merck Serono International SA, Sinclair, Synta Pharma, Thermosurgery, Vertex, Warner Chilcott, Wyeth, XOMA and Zars; T.H. with Genentech; A.B.G. with Abbott, Actelion, Almirall, Amgen, Beiersdorf, Biogen Idec, Bristol Myers Squibb, Can-Fite, Celera, Celgene, Centocor, DermiPsor, Eisai, Genentech, Immune Control, Incyte, Kemia, Medacorp, Medarex, Novo Nordisk, Pharmacare, Roche, RxClinical, Sankyo, Schering Plough, TEVA, UCB, Warner Chilcott and Wyeth. All income derived from these sources goes to her employer. I.C. and B.X. are employees and stockholders of Genentech.

Effects of topically applied acitretin in reconstructed human epidermis and the rhino mouse

Oral acitretin is currently indicated for the treatment of severe psoriasis in adults, but its use is limited by systemic side effects and teratogenicity. Topical administration of acitretin may lessen the risk of systemic toxicity while increasing local bioavailability in the skin. The effects of topical acitretin on reconstructed human epidermis (RHE) and Rhino mice were investigated and compared to those of currently marketed topical retinoids: tretinoin and tazarotene. In acitretin-treated RHE cultures, there was a reduction in keratohyalin granules and filaggrin expression in the stratum granulosum, a loss of keratin 10 expression in the stratum spinosum, and an increase in keratin 19 expression in all viable cell layers. All retinoids showed similar signs of activity in RHE cultures. Furthermore, the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-1alpha and IL-8 in RHE cultures was less pronounced with acitretin compared to tretinoin- and tazarotene-containing formulations, suggesting that acitretin may be less irritating. In Rhino mice, acitretin induced a local, dose-dependent reduction in utricle diameter after seven daily dermal doses. A similar effect was observed in tretinoin- and tazarotene-treated mice. Our data suggest that topical application of acitretin may have a therapeutic benefit in the local management of keratinization disorders.

Psoriasis: a general overview

Psoriasis is a common inflammatory dermatosis which affects 1.2 million people in the UK. Psoriasis is a chronic relapsing, remitting disease that varies in severity from relatively mild localized disease, to patients who have all their skin involved. With adequate treatment the signs and symptoms of psoriasis can be relieved. Newer therapeutic options are offering improvements in care for sufferers.

The long-term efficacy and safety of new biological therapies for psoriasis

Long-term therapy is often required for psoriasis. This article reviews the most recent long-term clinical data for biological agents that have been approved or for which late-stage development data have been released for the treatment of patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Efficacy data are available for up to five 12-week courses of alefacept (approximately 60 weeks of therapy), 36 months (144 weeks) of continuous efalizumab, 48 weeks of continuous etanercept, and 50 weeks of bimonthly infliximab. Data sources include publications, product labeling, and posters presented at recent international scientific meetings. Alefacept appears to continue to be efficacious over multiple treatment courses for some responsive patients. The efficacy of efalizumab achieved during the first 12-24 weeks of therapy appears to be maintained or improved through at least 60 weeks of continuous treatment. The efficacy of etanercept appears to be maintained through at least 48 weeks of continuous treatment. Infliximab demonstrates a high response rate soon after initiation, which appears to be maintained through 24 weeks but declines modestly with therapy out to 50 weeks. After 48 weeks, approximately 60% of efalizumab-treated and 45% of etanercept-treated patients remaining on therapy achieved > or =75% improvement from baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index, as did 70.5% of infliximab patients who did not miss more than two infusions. Safety data suggest that these agents may be used for long-term administration. Long-term data from psoriasis trials continue to accumulate. Recent data suggest that biological therapies have efficacy and safety profiles suitable for the long-term treatment of patients with moderate to severe psoriasis.

Impact of efalizumab on patient-reported outcomes in high-need psoriasis patients: results of the international, randomized, placebo-controlled Phase III Clinical Experience Acquired with Raptiva (CLEAR) trial [NCT00256139]

Background

Chronic psoriasis can negatively affect patients' lives. Assessing the impact of treatment on different aspects of a patient's health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is therefore important and relevant in trials of anti-psoriasis agents. The recombinant humanized IgG₁ monoclonal antibody efalizumab targets multiple T-cell-dependent steps in the immunopathogenesis of psoriasis. Efalizumab has demonstrated safety and efficacy in several clinical trials, and improves patients' quality of life. Objective: To evaluate the impact of efalizumab on HRQOL and other patient-reported outcomes in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, including a large cohort of High-Need patients for whom at least 2 other systemic therapies were unsuitable because of lack of efficacy, intolerance, or contraindication.

Methods

A total of 793 patients were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive efalizumab 1 mg/kg/wk (n = 529) or placebo (n = 264) for 12 weeks. The study population included 526 High-Need patients (342 efalizumab, 184 placebo). The treatment was evaluated by patients using the HRQOL assessment tools Short Form-36 (SF-36) and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). Other patient-reported assessments included the Psoriasis Symptom Assessment (PSA), a visual analog scale (VAS) for itching, and the Patient's Global Psoriasis Assessment (PGPA).

Results

Efalizumab was associated with improvements at Week 12 from baseline in patient-reported outcomes, both in the total study population and in the High-Need cohort. Among all efalizumab-treated patients, the DLQI improved by 5.7 points from baseline to Week 12, relative to an improvement of 2.3 points for placebo patients (P < .001). Corresponding improvements in DLQI in the High-Need cohort were 5.4 points for efalizumab compared to 2.3 for placebo (P < .001). Improvements from baseline on the SF-36, PSA, PGPA, and itching VAS at Week 12 were also significantly greater in efalizumab-treated patients than for placebo.

Conclusion

A 12-week course of efalizumab improved HRQOL and other patient-reported outcomes in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. The benefits of efalizumab therapy in High-Need patients were similar to those observed in the total study population, indicating that the beneficial impact of efalizumab on QOL is consistent regardless of disease severity, prior therapy, or contraindications to previous therapies.

Impurity analysis of retinoic acid samples

The structure of an impurity contained in samples of all trans-retinoic acid was established by means of NMR and MS spectra, and confirmed by X-ray diffraction analysis. The chemical structure of the impurity 2 was found to be strictly correlated to the synthetic procedure employed for the preparation of the retinoic acid samples. Single crystal analysis allowed us to characterise the molecular conformation and the crystal structure of 2.

Efficacy and safety of oral retinoids in psoriasis

With the advent of new biological agents, interest in the treatment of psoriasis has been renewed. Vitamin A and its derivatives (retinoids) have been used successfully in the treatment of psoriasis for over 30 years. In this paper, data on the efficacy and safety of oral retinoids for the treatment of various forms of psoriasis is reviewed. Studies have shown that retinoids are particularly effective in the treatment of pustular and palmoplantar psoriasis. When used in conjunction with ultraviolet therapy, retinoids appear to have a synergistic effect and can be used safely as long-term maintenance therapy. The most common side effects of oral retinoids are usually modest, treatable or reversible, and predominantly affect the liver, musculoskeletal and neurological systems. Potential teratogenicity remains the primary concern with use in women. Oral retinoids appear to be well tolerated in paediatric and HIV-infected patients.

Current concepts in psoriasis and its treatment

Many advances have been made in our understanding of the biology of psoriasis over the past 20 years. We are close to knowing the genetic determinants of psoriasis. There is now greater insight into the immunological mechanisms that produce the phenotype, and the possibility of intervening selectively to antagonise some of these mechanisms is becoming a reality. Nevertheless, psoriasis remains an enigmatic disease, and much of the suffering it produces is not adequately addressed. The sheer number of treatments that are used therapeutically suggests a lack of efficacy and/or toxicity of many of these approaches. In this review, we aim to briefly describe the biology of psoriasis, document the key features of treatments that are available or under development, and explain how these treatments can be used effectively to manage this chronic relapsing disease.

Efficacy and safety of cyclosporine versus methotrexate in severe psoriasis: a study from north India

Treatment of patients with severe psoriasis is difficult. Among the number of systemic drugs that are available, methotrexate has long been used, but cyclosporine has been recently recommended for the management of severe psoriasis. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of daily cyclosporine with weekly methotrexate in the management of severe psoriasis. Thirty consecutive patients with severe psoriasis were randomly assigned to treatment with cyclosporine or methotrexate. The initial dose of cyclosporine was 3 mg/kg/day, which was increased to a maximum of 4 mg/kg after two weeks of therapy when the response was not adequate. Methotrexate was administered weekly at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg. Clinical response was assessed by calculating PASI score in all patients at biweekly intervals. Patients were followed up fortnightly up to a maximum of 12 weeks. The doses of both drugs were gradually tapered once >75% reduction in disease severity was attained. Marked improvement (>75%) reduction in PASI was noted in all patients except for one in the cyclosporine group. The median time for marked improvement was 5.3 weeks with methotrexate and 6.8 weeks with cyclosporine. Patients on methotrexate were found to have more rapid and complete clearance than those on cyclosporine. Both drugs were well tolerated. Side effects in both the treatment groups were minor, transient, and manageable. At doses with comparable safety profiles, methotrexate resulted in more rapid and cost effective clearance of patients with severe psoriasis. Cyclosporine can provide an effective and safe alternative.

What criteria do patients use when judging the effectiveness of psoriasis management?

Judgements on the effectiveness of psoriasis management are based on clinical criteria employed by dermatologists, and how they take account of patients' experiences in the process of history taking. In this study the aim was to gain the in-depth patients' perspective and investigate the criteria that they employ when making judgements about the effectiveness of their therapy. These findings were then compared with the clinical and research literature on the clinical effectiveness of psoriasis treatments. The study design is exploratory-descriptive, using a qualitative ethnographic approach. In-depth interviews were undertaken in an outpatient department dermatology clinic. A purposive sample of 20 adult patients currently attending represented the following types of psoriasis: guttate, chronic plaque and scalp. A key comparable finding between the literature and the interview data is that dermatologists emphasize observable criteria of effectiveness, such as clearance of the lesion, whereas patients emphasis focuses on the subjective concerns, such as suppleness, softness and alleviation of itch. This discrepancy needs to be considered during history taking, in relation to its impact on therapy concordance and in the use and development of outcome measures used for clinical assessment and evaluations of psoriasis therapy.

Topical retinoic acid alters the expression of cellular retinoic acid-binding protein-I and cellular retinoic acid-binding protein-II in non-lesional but not lesional psoriatic skin

Therapeutic retinoids have profound effects on psoriatic skin pathology but their interactions with various retinoid-binding proteins in lesional vs non-lesional skin have not been investigated. Using quantitative real-time PCR the mRNA expression of cellular retinol-binding protein I (CRBPI) and retinoic acid-binding protein I/II (CRABPI/CRABPII) was studied in psoriatic and healthy control (=normal) skin after 4 days of occlusive RA/vehicle treatment (n=6). Untreated psoriatic lesions showed a markedly elevated CRABPII/CRABPI ratio, while the CRBPI level was reduced in lesional and non-lesional skin as compared to normal skin. In RA-treated normal and non-lesional skin, the mRNA expression of CRBPI was unaltered while that of CRABPI and CRABPII was reduced by approximately 80% and increased approximately 5-fold, respectively, as compared to vehicle-treated skin. In contrast, lesional skin exposed to RA showed an almost 90% increase in CRBPI transcripts but unaltered expression of CRABPI and CRABPII, yet, the mRNA expression of several inflammatory mediators, e.g. inducible nitric oxide synthase, interferon-gamma and interleukin-1beta, was clearly reduced. Immunohistochemistry localized CRABPII to suprabasal keratinocytes in normal skin and revealed markedly elevated levels in lesional skin. RA treatment induced CRABPII protein expression in normal and non-lesional skin, to similar levels as in untreated lesions. The results indicate that the effects of RA differ in normal/non-lesional psoriatic skin and lesional skin. Whether the high expression of CRABPII in psoriatic skin lesions is due to increased amounts of endogenous retinoids in lesional skin or reflects an abnormal regulation of the CRABPII gene in psoriasis remains to be studied.

Calcitriol 3 microg g-1 ointment in combination with ultraviolet B phototherapy for the treatment of plaque psoriasis: results of a comparative study

BACKGROUND

Combinations of topical treatments and ultraviolet (UV) B phototherapy for plaque psoriasis may be more beneficial than either type of treatment used alone.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the efficacy of calcitriol 3 microg g-1 ointment in combination with UVB phototherapy in treating plaque psoriasis.

METHODS

Calcitriol ointment with UVB was compared with vehicle plus UVB in a randomized, double-blind study in 104 patients.

RESULTS

Mean global improvement scores for both groups increased over the 8-week study period; there was a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) in favour of the calcitriol/UVB combination from week 1. At end-point, 45% of the calcitriol/UVB group showed considerable improvement or clearing of psoriasis, compared with 21% of the control group. The superiority of calcitriol plus UVB was also reflected in the global severity and Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) scores; at end-point the mean percentage decrease in PASI score was 65% for the calcitriol/UVB group and 43% for vehicle/UVB (P = 0.0014). The incidence of skin-related adverse events was low (< 12%) and similar in the two treatment groups. No clinically significant changes in blood chemistry, in particular calcium levels, occurred. The greater efficacy of combined calcitriol and phototherapy allowed a 34% decrease in total UVB exposure.

CONCLUSIONS

Calcitriol 3 microg g-1 ointment and UVB phototherapy in combination provides a promising therapy for managing chronic plaque psoriasis.

Psoriasis: current perspectives with an emphasis on treatment

An individualized treatment regimen is necessary for each patient with psoriasis because of the diverse nature of the disease. The manifestation of psoriasis, the severity and extent of the lesions, and the medical history and lifestyle of the patient are important factors that determine the selection of treatment, but in general therapies with the fewest side effects are preferred. First-line topical treatments are corticosteroids, calcipotriene, and tazarotene. If topical treatments are unsuccessful, phototherapy with ultraviolet B or photochemotherapy with psoralens plus ultraviolet A (PUVA) are the next choices. If psoriasis fails to respond to an adequate trial of topical therapy or phototherapy, systemic therapies including methotrexate, acitretin, or cyclosporin should be initiated. Because the regimens involved in systemic and phototherapy are complex and require frequent dose adjustments and specialized equipment, the patient should be referred to a dermatologist when topical therapy is not effective.

Reducing lung cancer risk: early detection

Strategies for the early detection of lung cancer are being investigated in an attempt to improve the poor prognosis associated with the disease. Such approaches, which include the identification of biomarkers for preclinical disease, must be integrated into multimodal cancer prevention strategies. Recent investigations have identified potential markers of early disease, including heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein, although the use of multiple markers may be required to provide the sensitivity and specificity necessary for mass screening. Early detection necessitates the development of effective chemoprevention strategies for the airway-confined phase of lung cancer. Current research efforts explore the utility of direct drug delivery, such as with the use of aerosolized delivery of retinoids, to maximize delivery of the active agent to the site of early lung cancer while avoiding systemic adverse effects.

Acitretin in combination with UVB or PUVA

Combination therapy of psoriasis with acitretin and phototherapy (psoralen-ultraviolet A [PUVA] or ultraviolet B [UVB]) offers multiple advantages over use of either modality alone. As monotherapy, acitretin in doses of 50 mg/day is moderately effective, but is associated with numerous side effects. Single modality treatment with UVB or PUVA involves multiple visits over a period of months and is also associated with dose-limiting side effects. When used in combination, lower doses of both modalities can be used more effectively, helping to reduce side effects. In addition, clearing occurs much more quickly, reducing treatment time and number of phototherapy visits. Moreover, patients whose psoriasis does not clear with monotherapy will often achieve significant clearing with the combination of acitretin and phototherapy.

Acitretin in psoriasis: an overview of adverse effects

Oral retinoids are among the drugs of choice for pustular and erythrodermic psoriasis. In addition, retinoids are effective in combination with other topical and systemic agents for the treatment of plaque-type psoriasis. Acitretin, the active retinoid metabolite, has replaced etretinate in retinoid therapy of psoriasis because of its more favorable pharmacokinetic profile, including a significantly shorter half-life. Retinoids, including acitretin, are potent teratogens, leading to strict requirements for pregnancy prevention during and after their use. Other retinoid side effects are generally preventable or manageable through proper patient selection, dose adjustments, and routine monitoring. Mucocutaneous side effects such as cheilitis and hair loss are the most common dose-dependent side effects, requiring dose reduction in some patients. Less common effects such as hepatotoxicity, serum lipid alterations, pancreatitis, and possible skeletal effects are also discussed.

Treatments of generalized pustular psoriasis: a multicenter study in Japan

This study analyzed data from treatments of 385 cases of generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) from 325 hospitals in Japan. Retinoid treatment was effective in 84.1% of patients, methotrexate in 76.2%, cyclosporine in 71.2%, oral PUVA therapy in 45.7%, and tonsillectomy in 16.7%. Short-term therapy with systemic corticosteroid for GPP during only the phase with severe systemic clinical findings may be also effective (75.4%). However, these treatments for GPP each differed in clinical effects, prognosis, and side effects. These findings may be useful in creating guidelines for treatment of generalized pustular psoriasis. Further studies based on these specific clinical effects are necessary.

Combination therapy with low-dose etretinate and eicosapentaenoic acid for psoriasis vulgaris

A randomized open study was undertaken to compare the therapeutic effects between low-dose etretinate alone and low-dose etretinate combined with eicosapentaenoic acid in 40 patients with chronic, stable psoriasis vulgaris. Better and more rapid improvement was obtained with the combination therapy for 12 weeks than with low-dose etretinate monotherapy. Eicosapentaenoic acid was safe, and adverse reactions due to low-dose etretinate were mild or tolerable. The combination regimen, therefore, has a satisfactory effect on psoriasis without marked adverse reactions.

The use of retinoids in the pediatric patient

Oral retinoids are molecules derived from vitamin A that represent one of the most important steps forward in dermatologic therapeutics in the present century. The treatment of acne, severe psoriasis, and severe disorders of keratinization, prevalent diseases in children and adolescents, have radically changed since the advent of oral retinoids. Like most highly-effective medications, oral retinoids also have important untoward effects. Specialists, and in particular, dermatologists and pediatricians should be prepared to maneuver the delicate balance between therapeutic efficacy and side effects in order to give the pediatric patient the maximum benefit with the lowest possible risk.

Lack of involvement of retinoic acid receptor alpha in retinoid-induced skin irritation in hairless mice

It has been proposed that RAR gamma, the major retinoic acid receptor (RAR) subtype in skin, mediates retinoid-induced skin irritation. However, RAR alpha is also found in skin, and its role in retinoid-induced skin irritation has not been tested. In this study, RAR subtype-specific agonists and antagonists were used to test the possible contribution of RAR alpha to retinoid-induced skin irritation. Female hairless mice were treated topically on the dorsal skin for 5 days with various retinoids over a 2-log dose range, and cutaneous toxicity was scored by semiquantitative visual observations of skin flaking and abrasions daily up to 3 days post-treatment. Three RAR alpha-selective agonists were > or = 100-fold less potent as skin irritants than the structurally-related RAR pan-agonist, TTNPB. Skin irritation potency decreased in the following order: TTNPB > > Am580 > AGN 193835 > > 193836 and correlated with RAR beta and/or RAR gamma binding affinity rather than RAR alpha binding affinity. TTNPB-induced skin irritation was blocked in a dose-dependent fashion by co-treatment with the RAR pan-antagonist AGN 193109 but was not blocked by co-treatment with the RAR alpha-specific antagonist AGN 194301. In contrast, skin irritation induced by the RAR alpha-selective agonist AGN 193835 was almost completely blocked by co-treatment with AGN 193644, an RAR beta/gamma-selective antagonist. These data demonstrate that RAR alpha is not significantly involved in mediating retinoid-induced skin irritation in mice and suggest that RAR alpha-selective agonists may have reduced mucocutaneous side effects relative to other retinoids.