Efficacy and safety of methotrexate in recalcitrant cutaneous lupus erythematosus: results of a retrospective study in 43 patients

An Overview of Methotrexate Indications in Skin Diseases

Methotrexate is an immunosuppressive drug with remarkable therapeutic results in the treatment of autoimmune and proliferative skin diseases. Although it has been more than half a century since it was first introduced into the therapeutic arsenal of dermatologists, there are currently no standardized therapeutic protocols regarding the prescription of methotrexate in dermatology, with the exception of psoriasis treatment. This review aims to highlight the indications and benefits of methotrexate beyond psoriasis, with a focus on a wide range of inflammatory, vesiculobullous, and proliferative dermatological pathologies.

Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus: Review and Considerations for Older Populations

Though more common earlier in life, increasing attention is being focused on the development of cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) in patients with advancing age. Studies show that CLE is more common in older populations than previously thought, and all CLE subtypes are possible in this group. Just like patients in the third or fourth decade of life, CLE may appear alongside or independent of systemic lupus erythematosus. Older populations manifesting CLE for the first time seem to have a lower risk of progression to systemic disease than younger peers, and are more commonly White. CLE must be carefully distinguished from other skin conditions that have a predilection for presentation in older populations, including rosacea, lichen planus, and other autoimmune conditions such as dermatomyositis or pemphigus/pemphigoid. It is thought that most CLE in older populations is drug-induced, with drug-induced subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus being the most common subtype. Management of CLE in older patients focuses on eliminating unnecessary medications known to induce CLE, and otherwise treatment proceeds similarly to that in younger patients, with a few special considerations.

Emerging immunotherapeutic strategies for cutaneous lupus erythematosus: an overview of recent phase 2 and 3 clinical trials

INTRODUCTION

Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) is an autoimmune disease that is clinically heterogenous and may occur with or without the presence of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). While existing on a spectrum, CLE and SLE present differences in their underlying pathogenesis and therapeutic responses. No new therapies have been approved in recent decades by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for CLE, although frequently refractory to conventional therapies. There is an unmet need to develop effective drugs for CLE as it significantly impacts patients' quality of life and may leave irreversible disfiguring damage.

AREAS COVERED

This review provides an update on the latest phase 2 and 3 clinical trials performed in CLE or SLE using skin-specific outcome measures. Emergent therapies are presented alongside their mechanism of action as recent translational studies have permitted identification of critical targets among immune cells and/or pathways involved in CLE.

EXPERT OPINION

While the recent literature has few trials for CLE, drugs targeting type I interferon, its downstream signaling and plasmacytoid dendritic cells have shown promising results. Further research is required to develop long-awaited effective therapies, and this review highlights the importance of implementing trials dedicated to CLE to fill the current gap in CLE therapeutics.

Chilblains in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: a review

Chilblains were first described over a hundred years ago as cutaneous inflammatory lesions, typically on the digits, occurring on cold exposure. Chilblains can be primary, or secondary to a number of conditions such as infections, including COVID-19, and immune-mediated inflammatory disorders (IMIDs) with SLE being the commonest. Chilblain lupus erythematosus (CHLE) was first described in 1888 as cold-induced erythematous lesions before the terms 'chilblains' or 'perniosis' were coined. Diagnostic criteria exist for both chilblains and CHLE. Histopathologically, CHLE lesions show interface dermatitis with perivascular lymphocytic infiltrate. Immunofluorescence demonstrates linear deposits of immunoglobulins and complement in the dermo-epidermal junction. This narrative review focuses on chilblains secondary to immune-mediated inflammatory disorders, primarily the epidemiology, pathogenesis and treatment of CHLE.

Diagnosis and Management of Cutaneous Manifestations of Autoimmune Connective Tissue Diseases

The cutaneous features of autoimmune connective tissue disease pose a unique challenge to patients and clinicians managing these conditions. In this review, we outline the key elements of diagnosis and treatment of cutaneous lupus erythematosus, dermatomyositis, systemic sclerosis, and morphea. This article also aims to present an update on gold standard as well as new and emerging therapies for these conditions. Overall, dermatologists can play a key role in diagnosing and treating autoimmune connective tissue diseases and this review intends to provide an up-to-date toolkit to guide clinical dermatologists in this endeavor.

An update on the management of refractory cutaneous lupus erythematosus

Management of cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) involves a combination of preventive measures, topical and systemic drugs, fairly similar for the different subtypes. Although guidelines exist, to date, no specific drugs have been specifically licensed for CLE. Antimalarials remain the first-line systemic treatment, but many patients do not respond, making refractory lupus a challenge for clinicians. The choice of alternative medication should be based on effectiveness, safety and cost. Most of the available drugs for CLE have been adapted from systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) treatment but the existing literature is limited to small studies and evidence often lacks. As knowledge of pathogenesis of both CLE and SLE is improving, promising new therapies are emerging. In this review, we discuss the available medications, focusing on the novelties under development for CLE.

On which evidence can we rely when prescribing off-label methotrexate in dermatological practice? - a systematic review with GRADE approach

If an authorized drug is prescribed for a use that is not described in the Summary of Product Characteristics, this is defined as 'off-label use.' Methotrexate is often used off-label for dermatological indications. Off-label use is permitted if physicians can justify the treatment based on scientific evidence available to them. Our objective here was therefore to summarize the evidence for the effectiveness, efficacy, and safety of the dermatological off-label use of methotrexate in a systematic review. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL for studies for evidence on the effectiveness, efficacy, and safety of the off-label use of methotrexate in dermatological indications up to November 2019. We used the GRADE system to rate the quality of the evidence. The search retrieved 34,583 hits of which 3566 were selected after the title and abstract screening. After the full-text screening, 143 studies were included, which involved 3688 patients in total. We found low-quality evidence for the effectiveness, efficacy, and safety of the off-label use of methotrexate in 31 dermatological diseases. To optimize the quality of evidence to support off-label use, we need high-quality studies in which well-characterized patients are treated with standardized treatments regimens using well-validated outcomes relevant to patients and physicians.

Guideline for the diagnosis, treatment and long-term management of cutaneous lupus erythematosus

Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) is an inflammatory, autoimmune disease encompassing a broad spectrum of subtypes including acute, subacute, chronic and intermittent CLE. Among these, chronic CLE can be further classified into several subclasses of lupus erythematosus (LE) such as discoid LE, verrucous LE, LE profundus, chilblain LE and Blaschko linear LE. To provide all dermatologists and rheumatologists with a practical guideline for the diagnosis, treatment and long-term management of CLE, this evidence- and consensus-based guideline was developed following the checklist established by the international Reporting Items for Practice Guidelines in Healthcare (RIGHT) Working Group and was registered at the International Practice Guideline Registry Platform. With the joint efforts of the Asian Dermatological Association (ADA), the Asian Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (AADV) and the Lupus Erythematosus Research Center of Chinese Society of Dermatology (CSD), a total of 25 dermatologists, 7 rheumatologists, one research scientist on lupus and 2 methodologists, from 16 countries/regions in Asia, America and Europe, participated in the development of this guideline. All recommendations were agreed on by at least 80% of the 32 voting physicians. As a consensus, diagnosis of CLE is mainly based on the evaluation of clinical and histopathological manifestations, with an exclusion of SLE by assessment of systemic involvement. For localized CLE lesions, topical corticosteroids and topical calcineurin inhibitors are first-line treatment. For widespread or severe CLE lesions and (or) cases resistant to topical treatment, systemic treatment including antimalarials and (or) short-term corticosteroids can be added. Notably, antimalarials are the first-line systemic treatment for all types of CLE, and can also be used in pregnant patients and pediatric patients. Second-line choices include thalidomide, retinoids, dapsone and MTX, whereas MMF is third-line treatment. Finally, pulsed-dye laser or surgery can be added as fourth-line treatment for localized, refractory lesions of CCLE in cosmetically unacceptable areas, whereas belimumab may be used as fourth-line treatment for widespread CLE lesions in patients with active SLE, or recurrence of ACLE during tapering of corticosteroids. As for management of the disease, patient education and a long-term follow-up are necessary. Disease activity, damage of skin and other organs, quality of life, comorbidities and possible adverse events are suggested to be assessed in every follow-up visit, when appropriate.

Cutaneous Manifestations of "Lupus": Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Beyond

Lupus, Latin for "wolf," is a term used to describe many dermatologic conditions, some of which are related to underlying systemic lupus erythematosus, while others are distinct disease processes. Cutaneous lupus erythematosus includes a wide array of visible skin manifestations and can progress to systemic lupus erythematosus in some cases. Cutaneous lupus can be subdivided into three main categories: acute cutaneous lupus erythematosus, subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus, and chronic cutaneous lupus erythematosus. Physical exam, laboratory studies, and histopathology enable differentiation of cutaneous lupus subtypes. This differentiation is paramount as the subtype of cutaneous lupus informs upon treatment, disease monitoring, and prognostication. This review outlines the different cutaneous manifestations of lupus erythematosus and provides an update on both topical and systemic treatment options for these patients. Other conditions that utilize the term "lupus" but are not cutaneous lupus erythematosus are also discussed.

Mehr als nur der Schmetterling – ein Leitfaden durch die Vielfalt des kutanen Lupus erythematodes

Die vielen klinischen Varianten des kutanen Lupus erythematodes (CLE) können solitär oder im Rahmen eines systemischen Lupus erythematodes (SLE) auftreten, auf dessen Vorkommen regelmäßig gescreent werden muss. Neben dem weiblichen Geschlecht und genetischen Faktoren stellen Sonnenexposition, Rauchen und manche Medikamente Risikofaktoren dar. Die wichtigsten CLE-Formen sind der akut-kutane LE (z. B. Schmetterlingserythem, generalisiert makulopapulös, enoral), der subakut-kutane LE (z. B. anuläre Form) und der chronisch-kutane LE (z. B. vernarbend diskoide Läsionen, Pannikulitis, Chilblain-LE). Die Diagnose beruht vor allem auf der Klinik und der Histopathologie, hinzu kommen autoimmunserologische Befunde und die direkte Immunfluoreszenz. Milde CLE-Formen können lokal therapiert werden. Reicht dies nicht aus, ist neben einem Steroidstoß Hydroxychloroquin die Systemtherapie der Wahl. Erweiterte therapeutische Optionen stellen Methotrexat, Retinoide, Dapson, Mycophenolat Mofetil, Azathioprin, Thalidomid, Belimumab und Rituximab dar. Alle CLE-Therapien sind off-label. Eine Aktualisierung der Impfungen sollte nach Möglichkeit vor Beginn einer Immunsuppression stattfinden. Zur Objektivierung des therapeutischen Ansprechens eines CLE empfiehlt sich das regelmäßige Scoring mittels RCLASI (Revised CLE Disease Area and Severity Index). Präventiv ist Sonnenschutz (Cremen, Kleidung, Reiseziele) von höchster Wichtigkeit, da Sonnenexposition Schübe provozieren kann. Ein LE stellt keine Kontraindikation gegen eine Schwangerschaft (SS) dar, jedoch sollte diese nicht in einem Schub eintreten, da dies das Risiko für Fetus und Mutter erhöht. Therapeutisch kommen während einer SS v. a. Steroide, Hydroxychloroquin, Dapson und Azathioprin in Betracht.

Recent Insight on the Management of Lupus Erythematosus Alopecia

Lupus erythematosus (LE) is a chronic autoimmune condition with a wide spectrum of clinical presentations. Alopecias, both non-scarring and scarring, frequently occur in the context of LE and can assume several different patterns. Furthermore, alopecia occurring with LE may be considered LE-specific if LE-specific features are present on histology; otherwise, alopecia is considered non-LE-specific. Non-scarring alopecia is highly specific to systemic LE (SLE), and therefore has been regarded as a criterion for the diagnosis of SLE. Variants of cutaneous LE (CLE), including acute, subacute, and chronic forms, are also capable of causing hair loss, and chronic CLE is an important cause of primary cicatricial alopecia. Other types of hair loss not specific to LE, including telogen effluvium, alopecia areata, and anagen effluvium, may also occur in a patient with lupus. Lupus alopecia may be difficult to treat, particularly in cases that have progressed to scarring. The article summarizes the types of lupus alopecia and recent insight regarding their management. Data regarding the management of lupus alopecia are sparse and limited to case reports, and therefore, many studies including in this review report the efficacy of treatments on CLE as a broader entity. In general, for patients with non-scarring alopecia in SLE, management is aimed at controlling SLE activity with subsequent hair regrowth. Topical medications can be used to expedite recovery. Prompt treatment is crucial in the case of chronic CLE due to potential for scarring and irreversible damage. First-line therapies for CLE include topical corticosteroids and oral antimalarials, with or without oral corticosteroids as bridging therapy. Second and third-line systemic treatments for CLE include methotrexate, retinoids, dapsone, mycophenolate mofetil, and mycophenolate acid. Additional topical and systemic medications as well as physical modalities used for the treatment of lupus alopecia and CLE are discussed herein.

Candidate drug replacements for quinacrine in cutaneous lupus erythematosus

Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) is a disfiguring and potentially disabling disease that causes significant morbidity in patients. Antimalarials are an important class of medication used to treat this disease and have been the first-line systemic therapy since the 1950s. Quinacrine, in particular, is used as an adjuvant therapy to other antimalarials for improved control of CLE. Quinacrine is currently unavailable in the USA, which has taken away an important component of the treatment regimen of patients with CLE. This paper reviews the evidence of available local and systemic therapies in order to assist providers in choosing alternative treatments for patients who previously benefited from quinacrine therapy.

Expert Perspective: An Evidence-Based Approach to Refractory Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus

Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease that can present with a variety of skin manifestations and have a dramatic effect on a patient's quality of life. Effective treatment options for this disease are limited, and the efficacy of these treatments is often supported by low levels of evidence. This makes the treatment of refractory disease especially challenging, as it is difficult to achieve a consensus on the appropriate progression of treatment beyond first- and second-line treatment options. The treatment of refractory CLE often involves some degree of immunosuppression, which carries some risk for patients and requires a thoughtful approach to the selection of medications. Some treatments that have proven to be effective in systemic disease may not be as effective in cutaneous disease, making it difficult to extrapolate from the available evidence on systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Ultimately, the increased use of objective skin measurements in SLE clinical trials is necessary to understand drug efficacy in CLE and develop new treatments for this challenging disease. Here, we provide clinical examples of the challenges involved in treating refractory CLE, examine the evidence currently available for treatment options, and provide an algorithmic approach to the treatment of refractory disease based on this evidence. Novel therapies under development for CLE are also discussed, as they may soon be part of the accepted treatment regimen for refractory CLE.

The pathogenesis of cutaneous lupus erythematosus: The aberrant distribution and function of different cell types in skin lesions

Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) is an autoimmune disease with a broad range of cutaneous manifestations. In skin lesions of CLE, keratinocytes primarily undergo apoptosis. Interferon-κ(IFN-κ) is belonged to type I interferons (type I IFNs) and is selectively produced by keratinocytes. Recently, keratinocytes selectively produced IFN-κ is identified to be a key to trigger type I interferon responses in CLE. Other immune cells such as plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) are identified to be relevant origin of type I interferons (type I IFNs) which are central to the development of CLE lesions and responsible for mediating Th1 cell activity. Other types of cells such as neutrophils, B cells and Th17 cells also are involved in the development of this disease. The close interaction of those cells composes a comprehensive and complicated network in CLE. In this review, we discussed the aberrant distribution and function of different cells types involved in this disease and will offer a new direction for research and therapy in the near future.

Cutaneous lupus erythematosus: The impact of self-amplifying innate and adaptive immune responses and future prospects of targeted therapies

Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) is a heterogeneous autoimmune disease encompassing a broad spectrum of skin conditions including localized plaques or widespread lesions, which may be accompanied by systemic involvement (systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)). The disease is characterized by necroptotic keratinocytes and a cytotoxic immune cell infiltrate at the dermo-epidermal junction (DEJ), orchestrated by interferon (IFN)-regulated proinflammatory cytokines. Molecular analyses revealed a strong upregulation of innate and adaptive immune pathways in lesional skin including DNA-recognition pathways, chemokine signalling, antigen presentation and B- and T-cell activation, which are believed to interact in a complex self-amplifying network. Concerning adaptive immune signalling, particularly B cells are currently being studied as there is growing evidence for additional abilities besides autoantibody expression in skin autoimmunity. These detailed insights have paved the way for the development of drugs targeting crucial molecules of pathogenic immune cells and pathways. Moreover, they forwarded the understanding of distinct molecular mechanisms within CLE subtypes, which might enable a more mechanism-directed, stratified pharmacotherapy of LE skin lesions in the future.

Topical methotrexate in dermatology: a review of the literature

Background: Systemic methotrexate (MTX) is a useful treatment for many dermatologic conditions, however, the risk of adverse events prevents its use in patients with minimal or localized disease. Topical application of MTX may be an option to avoid the systemic adverse effects of oral MTX.Objective: To assess what is known about the efficacy and safety of topical methotrexate.Methods: A search on Pubmed was conducted. There were no limits on publication date.Results: A total of 963 articles were discovered. Using our exclusion criteria, 916 articles were excluded; 47 articles were used for full text assessment. Topical MTX has been used primarily in psoriasis but also in mycosis fungoides, lymphomatoid papulosis, and oral precancerous lesions. Optimal delivery system and formulation for adequate penetration is still under investigation.Conclusion: The quality of evidence for the utility of topical methotrexate in psoriasis is good, however, for other dermatologic diseases, the quality is poor. Topical MTX with improved delivery methods may be a viable tool against certain localized dermatologic conditions for patients who do not tolerate oral MTX. Further double-blinded randomized controled studies are needed to substantiate the utility of topical methotrexate.

Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus: Progress and Challenges

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The review provides an update on the diagnosis, pathogenesis, and treatment of cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE).

RECENT FINDINGS

Diagnostic challenges exist in better defining CLE as an independent disease distinct from systemic lupus erythematosus with cutaneous features and further classifying CLE based on clinical, histological, and laboratory features. Recent mechanistic studies revealed more genetic variations, environmental triggers, and immunologic dysfunctions that are associated with CLE. Drug induction specifically has emerged as one of the most important triggers for CLE. Treatment options include topical agents and systemic therapies, including newer biologics such as belimumab, rituximab, ustekinumab, anifrolumab, and BIIB059 that have shown good clinical efficacy in trials. CLE is a group of complex and heterogenous diseases. Future studies are warranted to better define CLE within the spectrum of lupus erythematosus. Better insight into the pathogenesis of CLE could facilitate the design of more targeted therapies.

Current Insights Into The Management Of Discoid Lupus Erythematosus

Discoid lupus erythematosus is the most disfiguring and common presentation of chronic cutaneous lupus erythematosus. Although most patients will respond to lifestyle measures and topical treatment, a non-negligible number of patients will require systemic and physical therapy, either alone or in combination. We performed a review of the available evidence on the discoid lupus erythematosus treatment. Lifestyle measures and topical treatment (corticosteroids and topical calcineurin inhibitors) remain the therapeutic strategies with the highest evidence level. Within systemic treatment approaches, antimalarial drugs are still the first-line therapy, while other systemic and physical therapies have highly variable evidence. Hence, we propose a therapeutic algorithm based on the strength of recommendations of the different treatment modalities, focusing on the refractory disease.

Management of cutaneous manifestations of lupus erythematosus: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE), occurring with or without systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), is a group of inflammatory skin diseases that can be very debilitating, causing significant psychological distress, and sometimes scarring.

OBJECTIVES

We sought to comprehensively present the evidence for different treatment modalities in patients with cutaneous manifestations of lupus erythematosus (LE).

METHODS

Medline, Embase, Scopus and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched electronically from 1990 to March 2019, using keywords related to cutaneous lupus and synonyms and treatment. Articles retrieved were screened for relevance, including reference lists of retrieved reviews. We included clinical trials, observational studies or case series with ≥5 patients focussing on treatment of CLE, with or without SLE.

RESULTS

The search identified 6637 studies, of which 107 were included. Each study commonly included a heterogeneous mixture of CLE subtypes, with or without SLE. The 107 included studies investigated 11 different categories of treatment in 7343 patients. Treatments included topical calcineurin inhibitors (13 studies), sun protection (5 studies), R-salbutamol cream (2 studies), antimalarials (22 studies), synthetic DMARDs (10 studies), retinoids (2 studies), thalidomide/lenalidomide (22 studies), biologic therapies (15 studies), intravenous immune globulin (3 studies), laser (6 studies) and other therapies (7 studies). General measures to be considered include smoking cessation, sun protection measures and optimisation of vitamin D levels. Moderate evidence exists for benefit with topical CNIs, particularly as a steroid sparing agent in areas at high risk of steroid complications (e.g. facial skin). There is moderate evidence for hydroxychloroquine, which is first-line in SLE patients, limited evidence to support other synthetic DMARDs, and moderate evidence supporting thalidomide but with significant risk of toxicity. Of biologic therapies, there are moderate data to support belimumab. Limited evidence exists for other therapies.

CONCLUSION

Many management options are available for CLE, including topical, systemic and biologic therapies, with a variable balance of efficacy and toxicity. There is a paucity of high-quality clinical trial data. Further trials are required to better understand optimal management of CLE, particularly in specific subgroups.

Cutaneous lupus erythematosus: A review of the literature

Knowledge with regard to the pathogenesis of lupus erythematosus has progressed rapidly over the past decade, and with it has come promising new agents for the treatment of cutaneous lupus erythematous (CLE). Classification of CLE is performed using clinical features and histopathologic findings, and is crucial for determining prognosis and choosing therapeutic options. Preventative therapy is critical in achieving optimal disease control, and patients should be counseled on sun-safe behavior and smoking cessation. First-line therapy includes topical corticosteroids and calcineurin inhibitors, with antimalarial therapy. Traditionally, refractory disease was treated with oral retinoids, dapsone, and other oral immunosuppressive drugs, but new therapies are emerging with improved side effect profiles and efficacy. Biologic agents, such as belimumab and ustekinumab, have been promising in case studies but will require larger trials to establish their role in routine therapy. Other novel therapies that have been trialed successfully include spleen tyrosine kinase inhibitors and fumaric acid esters. Finally, new evidence has been published recently that describes safer dosing regimens in thalidomide and lenalidomide, both effective medications for CLE. Given the chronic disease course of CLE, long-term treatment-related side effects must be minimized, and the introduction of new steroid-sparing agents is encouraging in this regard.

2019 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of systemic lupus erythematosus

Our objective was to update the EULAR recommendations for the management of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), based on emerging new evidence. We performed a systematic literature review (01/2007–12/2017), followed by modified Delphi method, to form questions, elicit expert opinions and reach consensus. Treatment in SLE aims at remission or low disease activity and prevention of flares. Hydroxychloroquine is recommended in all patients with lupus, at a dose not exceeding 5 mg/kg real body weight. During chronic maintenance treatment, glucocorticoids (GC) should be minimised to less than 7.5 mg/day (prednisone equivalent) and, when possible, withdrawn. Appropriate initiation of immunomodulatory agents (methotrexate, azathioprine, mycophenolate) can expedite the tapering/discontinuation of GC. In persistently active or flaring extrarenal disease, add-on belimumab should be considered; rituximab (RTX) may be considered in organ-threatening, refractory disease. Updated specific recommendations are also provided for cutaneous, neuropsychiatric, haematological and renal disease. Patients with SLE should be assessed for their antiphospholipid antibody status, infectious and cardiovascular diseases risk profile and preventative strategies be tailored accordingly. The updated recommendations provide physicians and patients with updated consensus guidance on the management of SLE, combining evidence-base and expert-opinion.

In silico Analyses of Skin and Peripheral Blood Transcriptional Data in Cutaneous Lupus Reveals CCR2-A Novel Potential Therapeutic Target

Cutaneous lesions feature prominently in lupus erythematosus (LE). Yet lupus and its cutaneous manifestations exhibit extraordinary clinical heterogeneity, making it imperative to stratify patients with varying organ involvement based on molecular criteria that may be of clinical value. We conducted several in silico bioinformatics-based analyses integrating chronic cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CCLE)-skin and blood expression profiles to provide novel insights into disease mechanisms and potential future therapy. In addition to substantiating well-known prominent apoptosis and interferon related response in both tissue environments, the overrepresentation of GO categories in the datasets, in the context of existing literature, led us to model a “disease road-map” demonstrating a coordinated orchestration of the autoimmune response in CCLE reflected in three phases: (1) initiation, (2) amplification, and (3) target damage in skin. Within this framework, we undertook in silico interactome analyses to identify significantly “over-connected” genes that are potential key functional players in the metabolic reprogramming associated with skin pathology in CCLE. Furthermore, overlapping and distinct transcriptional “hot spots” within CCLE skin and blood expression profiles mapping to specified chromosomal locations offer selected targets for identifying disease-risk genes. Lastly, we used a novel in silico approach to prioritize the receptor protein CCR2, whose expression level in CCLE tissues was validated by qPCR analysis, and suggest it as a drug target for use in future potential CCLE therapy.

Practical Management of Immunosuppressants in Dermatology

The treatment of inflammatory and autoimmune diseases is challenging because of their frequency and complexity. Treatment of these diseases is based on the suppression of the patient's immune system using corticosteroids, corticosteroid-sparing immunosuppressive agents, and biologic drugs, making an understanding of the management of immunosuppressive therapy essential. Before an immunosuppressive agent is prescribed, a study must be carried out to identify contraindications, detect latent infections, and determine the most appropriate dose. During treatment, regular monitoring is required to detect adverse effects. The clinician must be familiar with the time lag between start of treatment and onset of the immunosuppressive effect as well as the maximum recommended duration of treatment and cumulative dose for each drug. As dermatologists we are accustomed to using these immunosuppressive agents, but we should have a good knowledge of the guidelines for their use and the monitoring required in each case if we are to reduce variability and avoid potentially serious adverse effects.

Cutaneous lupus erythematosus: updates on pathogenesis and associations with systemic lupus

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) is a common manifestation among systemic lupus patients. There are no U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved therapies for CLE, and these lesions are frequently disfiguring and refractory to treatment. The present review will cover the recent inroads made into understanding the mechanisms behind CLE lesions and discuss promising therapeutic developments.

RECENT FINDINGS

The definition of cutaneous lupus is being refined to facilitate diagnostic and research protocols. Research into the pathogenesis of CLE is accelerating, and discoveries are now identifying genetic and epigenetic changes which may predispose to particular disease manifestations. Furthermore, unique features of disease subtypes are being defined. Murine work supports a connection between cutaneous inflammation and systemic lupus disease activity. Importantly, human trials of type I interferon blockade hold promise for improving our treatment armamentarium for refractory CLE lesions.

SUMMARY

Continued research to understand the mechanisms driving CLE will provide new methods for prevention and treatment of cutaneous lesions. These improvements may also have important effects on systemic disease activity, and thus, efforts to understand this link should be supported.

Primary cicatricial alopecia: Lymphocytic primary cicatricial alopecias, including chronic cutaneous lupus erythematosus, lichen planopilaris, frontal fibrosing alopecia, and Graham-Little syndrome

Both primary and secondary forms of cicatricial alopecia have been described. The hair follicles are the specific target of inflammation in primary cicatricial alopecias. Hair follicles are destroyed randomly with surrounding structures in secondary cicatricial alopecia. This 2-part continuing medical education article will review primary cicatricial alopecias according to the working classification suggested by the North American Hair Research Society. In this classification, the different entities are classified into 3 different groups according to their prominent inflammatory infiltrate (ie, lymphocytic, neutrophilic, and mixed). Part I discusses the following lymphocytic primary cicatricial alopecias: chronic cutaneous lupus erythematosus, lichen planopilaris, frontal fibrosing alopecia, and Graham-Little syndrome.

S2k guideline for treatment of cutaneous lupus erythematosus - guided by the European Dermatology Forum (EDF) in cooperation with the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV)

Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) is a rare inflammatory autoimmune disease with heterogeneous clinical manifestations. To date, no therapeutic agents have been licensed specifically for patients with this disease entity, and topical and systemic drugs are mostly used 'off-label'. The aim of the present guideline was to achieve a broad consensus on treatment strategies for patients with CLE by a European subcommittee, guided by the European Dermatology Forum (EDF) and supported by the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV). In total, 16 European participants were included in this project and agreed on all recommendations. Topical corticosteroids remain the mainstay of treatment for localized CLE, and further topical agents, such as calcineurin inhibitors, are listed as alternative first-line or second-line topical therapeutic option. Antimalarials are recommended as first-line and long-term systemic treatment in all CLE patients with severe and/or widespread skin lesions, particularly in patients with a high risk of scarring and/or the development of systemic disease. In addition to antimalarials, systemic corticosteroids are recommended as first-line treatment in highly active and/or severe CLE. Second- and third-line systemic treatments include methotrexate, retinoids, dapsone and mycophenolate mofetil or mycophenolate acid, respectively. Thalidomide should only be used in selected therapy-refractory CLE patients, preferably in addition to antimalarials. Several new therapeutic options, such as B-cell- or interferon α-targeted agents, need to be further evaluated in clinical trials to assess their efficacy and safety in the treatment of patients with CLE.

Therapeutic options for cutaneous lupus erythematosus: recent advances and future prospects

INTRODUCTION

Treatment and prevention are of critical importance in patients with cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE), as the disease can have a devastating effect on patient well-being and quality of life.

AREAS COVERED

We conducted a selective search of the PubMed database for articles published between December 2010 and November 2015. This review encompasses both non-pharmaceutical (photoprotection, smoking cessation, drug withdrawal, and vitamin D replacement) and pharmaceutical (topicals, antimalarials, immunosuppressives, biologics, etc.) interventions used in the treatment of CLE. Expert Commentary: Recent work has expanded our understanding of established therapies as well as introduced new treatments for consideration, though existing medications still prove inadequate for a subset of patients. Changes in trial design may help to alleviate this issue.

Fumaric acid ester treatment in cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE): a prospective, open-label, phase II pilot study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to assess the efficacy and safety of fumaric acid esters (FAEs) in patients with cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE).

METHODS

In this 24-week, prospective, open-label, phase II pilot study, 11 patients with CLE, refractory to topical corticosteroids, were included. The primary endpoint of the study was the evaluation of the efficacy of FAEs after 24 weeks of treatment as assessed by the Revised Cutaneous Lupus Disease Area and Severity Index (RCLASI).

RESULTS

Compared to baseline, significant improvement in the mean total RCLASI activity score and the mean RCLASI activity score for skin lesions was observed in week 12 (p = 0.002, p = 0.002, respectively) and in week 24 (p = 0.009, p = 0.009, respectively). Most common adverse events included abdominal cramps and headache.

CONCLUSIONS

FAEs could be an alternative and safe treatment in patients with therapy-refractory CLE; however, randomized controlled trials are warranted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FAEs in this disease.

Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus: An Update on Pathogenesis, Diagnosis and Treatment

Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) includes a broad range of dermatologic manifestations, which may or may not be associated with systemic disease. Recent studies in this area continue to shape our understanding of this disease and treatment options. Epidemiologic studies have found an incidence of CLE of 4.30 per 100,000, which approaches similar analysis for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Although there have been extensive efforts to define SLE, the classification of CLE and its subgroups remains a challenge. Currently, diagnosis relies on clinical and laboratory findings as well as skin histology. The Cutaneous Lupus Area and Severity Index™ (CLASI™) is a validated measure of disease activity and damage. CLE pathogenesis is multifactorial and includes genetic contributions as well as effects of ultraviolet (UV) light. Immune dysregulation and aberrant cell signaling pathways through cytokine cascades are also implicated. Patient education and avoidance of triggers are key to disease prevention. Antimalarials and topical steroids continue to be the standard of care; however, immunosuppressants, thalidomide analogs and monoclonal antibodies are possible systemic therapies for the treatment of recalcitrant disease.

Current and emerging treatment options in the management of lupus

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a complex autoimmune disease with variable clinical manifestations. While the clearest guidelines for the treatment of SLE exist in the context of lupus nephritis, patients with other lupus manifestations such as neuropsychiatric, hematologic, musculoskeletal, and severe cutaneous lupus frequently require immunosuppression and/or biologic therapy. Conventional immunosuppressive agents such as mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine, and cyclophosphamide are widely used in the management of SLE with current more rationalized treatment regimens optimizing the use of these agents while minimizing potential toxicity. The advent of biologic therapies has advanced the treatment of SLE particularly in patients with refractory disease. The CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab and the anti-BLyS agent belimumab are now widely in use in clinical practice. Several other biologic agents are in ongoing clinical trials. While immunosuppressive and biologic agents are the foundation of inflammatory disease control in SLE, the importance of managing comorbidities such as cardiovascular risk factors, bone health, and minimizing susceptibility to infection should not be neglected.

Kutaner Lupus erythematodes

The diagnosis of cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) requires a specific diagnostic approach to identify subtypes, to address differential diagnostic considerations, and to rule out systemic organ involvement. In addition to a detailed patient's history and clinical evaluation of the skin, histopathologic and immunofluorescent examination of a skin biopsy as well as laboratory screening are recommended. Photoprovocation tests can be performed to confirm the diagnosis of CLE and to assess photosensitivity in these patients. Recently, a scoring system for the activity of the cutaneous manifestations in CLE has been developed and validated which involves anatomical areas and morphologic signs of the skin lesions. In all subtypes of CLE, antimalarials are still the treatment of choice. Advances in biotechnology have led to the development of several novel agents for the treatment of autoimmune diseases; however, controlled trials have not been performed in patients with CLE. Furthermore, there is need for specific immunointervention, especially for patients who fail to respond to standard therapies. The second part of this review will enable the reader to differentiate CLE from other diseases and to suggest specific diagnostic procedures and treatment approaches.

Monoclonal antibody against macrophage colony-stimulating factor suppresses circulating monocytes and tissue macrophage function but does not alter cell infiltration/activation in cutaneous lesions or clinical outcomes in patients with cutaneous lupus erythematosus

This study's objective was to assess the effects of PD-0360324, a fully human immunoglobulin G2 monoclonal antibody against macrophage colony-stimulating factor in cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE). Patients with active subacute CLE or discoid lupus erythematosus were randomized to receive 100 or 150 mg PD-0360324 or placebo via intravenous infusion every 2 weeks for 3 months. Blood and urine samples were obtained pre- and post-treatment to analyse pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic changes in CD14(+) CD16(+) monocytes, urinary N-terminal telopeptide (uNTX), alanine/aspartate aminotransferases (ALT/AST) and creatine kinase (CK); tissue biopsy samples were taken to evaluate macrophage populations and T cells using immunohistochemistry. Clinical efficacy assessments included the Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index (CLASI). Among 28 randomized/analysed patients, peak/trough plasma concentrations increased in a greater-than-dose-proportional manner with dose increases from 100 to 150 mg. Statistically significant differences were observed between active treatment and placebo groups in changes from baseline in CD14(+) CD16(+) cells, uNTX, ALT, AST and CK levels at most time-points. The numbers, density and activation states of tissue macrophages and T cells did not change from baseline to treatment end. No between-group differences were seen in CLASI. Patients receiving PD-0360324 reported significantly more adverse events than those receiving placebo, but no serious adverse events. In patients with CLE, 100 and 150 mg PD-0360324 every 2 weeks for 3 months suppressed a subset of circulating monocytes and altered activity of some tissue macrophages without affecting cell populations in CLE skin lesions or improving clinical end-points.

Systemic lupus erythematosus: review of synthetic drugs

INTRODUCTION

Synthetic drugs are prescribed for nearly all patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), a multisystem autoimmune disease, to ameliorate symptoms and positively influence outcome. While only 2 biologic agents have been approved for the treatment of SLE, synthetic drugs are still the mainstay of therapy in SLE. The highly variable and unpredictable course of SLE poses a challenge for physicians as to what drug(s) should be prescribed for which patient.

AREAS COVERED

Previous and recent studies have evaluated several synthetic drugs in the treatment of SLE. This article reviews currently available evidence for the efficacy and safety of synthetic drugs in SLE and discusses future treatment perspectives.

EXPERT OPINION

Hydroxychloroquine should be considered an anchor drug in SLE because of the multiple beneficial effects of this agent. When patients present with persistent disease activity despite hydroxychloroquine therapy or need higher dosages and/or prolonged use of glucocorticoids (GCs), additional immunosuppressants should be promptly prescribed. Based on available evidence, azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil are the drugs of first choice. Determination of a 'safe' GC dose for chronic daily use is of major importance and should be subject of further studies in large patient populations.

A Randomized Comparative Study of Oral Corticosteroid Minipulse and Low-Dose Oral Methotrexate in the Treatment of Unstable Vitiligo

BACKGROUND

Despite continued progress towards elucidation of the biochemical, genetic and immunopathological pathways in vitiligo, a definitive cure remains elusive. The initial therapy must be directed to arrest disease progression. Oral minipulse therapy (OMP) with betamethasone/dexamethasone has been tried and shown to be an effective modality to arrest the disease progression in vitiligo.

OBJECTIVES

Methotrexate (MTX) is a time-tested effective treatment extensively used in various autoimmune disorders with good efficacy, safety and tolerability on a long-term basis. We intended to compare the efficacy of MTX with that of OMP in patients with unstable vitiligo vulgaris.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a prospective randomized open label study, 52 patients with vitiligo were divided into two groups. Patients in group 1 received 10 mg methotrexate weekly. Group 2 patients received corticosteroid OMP which comprised tablets of dexamethasone 2.5 mg (5 tablets), taken on 2 consecutive days in a week (total weekly dose of 5 mg dexamethasone).

RESULTS

In the MTX group, among 25 patients analyzed, during the course of treatment for 24 weeks, overall 6 patients developed new vitiliginous lesions. In the OMP group, 7/25 patients developed new lesions. Statistical correlation between the two groups showed no significance in the number of patients who developed new lesions (increasing disease activity) in either of the groups. At the end of the study, it was demonstrated that patients in both groups had a similar reduction in the vitiligo disease activity score.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrated that both drugs are equally effective in controlling the disease activity of vitiligo. MTX can be used in patients with active vitiligo, wherever corticosteroids are contraindicated.

Innate immune-response mechanisms in dermatomyositis: an update on pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment

Dermatomyositis (DM) is an autoimmune disease mainly affecting muscle and skin. Typical clinical and laboratory findings include muscle weakness with elevated muscle enzymes, characteristic skin lesions (e.g., Gottron papules, heliotrope erythema, Shawl sign), and specific serum autoantibodies. Recent studies have highlighted the activation of the innate immune system, including high expression of interferons (IFNs) and IFN-regulated proteins, as an important pathological hallmark of DM. These findings have changed our understanding of the disease fundamentally, since inappropriate activation of the innate immune system with secondary dysregulation of the adaptive immune response is now considered to be a central pathogenetic feature of DM. In this article, we review current guidelines and standards in diagnosis and treatment. We detail evidence-based and pathophysiology-based treatment strategies, with a focus on skin as well as on muscle lesions. Particularly, we discuss how the recent advances in the understanding of the pathomechanisms of DM have altered our conception of the mode of action of established drugs such as chloroquine and methotrexate. Finally, we outline possible future treatment strategies, with a focus on the innate immune system, e.g., targeting the IFN system with the anti-IFN-α antibody sifalimumab.

Which dose of steroids and which cytotoxics for severe lupus?

There have been a number of major advances in the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus and we are now in the era of biologic therapies for this multisystem autoimmune disorder. There has been a greater awareness of the toxicities of the traditional therapies including the recognition that the doses of corticosteroids used in the past have been excessive, resulting in unacceptable toxicities. Other advances have included the development of lower cumulative doses of cyclophosphamide and the widespread acceptance of mycophenolate mofetil for the treatment of lupus nephritis. This review addresses the current management of severe lupus with corticosteroids and cytotoxic agents.

Lupus erythematosus. Part II: clinical picture, diagnosis and treatment

Lupus erythematosus (LE) is an important dermatologic autoimmune disease. In many respects, it may be regarded as a model autoimmune disease due to its spectrum of autoimmune antibodies and involvement of different organ systems, as well as response to immunosuppressive agents which target B cells and T cells and their cytokines. A recently published article in this Journal summarized the most important knowledge about epidemiology, genetics, and immunology of LE. Here, the different clinical manifestations, diagnostic procedures and current therapeutic approaches will be described. Special emphasis is placed on different cutaneous manifestations of LE. In regard to treatment, the classic treatment approaches such as corticosteroids, methotrexate, chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine will be described. Lastly, new therapeutic approaches with specific monoclonal antibodies which are currently used in systemic LE, such as belimumab (Benlysta®), will be addressed. The most recent developments in this area could have implications even for purely cutaneous forms of LE.

Methotrexate in systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic review of its efficacy

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this review is to evaluate the evidence for efficacy of methotrexate (MTX) in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

METHODS

A comprehensive, computerized search was performed in MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE and the Cochrane Controlled Trials registry to screen for studies that examined the efficacy of MTX in adult SLE patients. The Jadad scoring system was used to assess study quality, and data were pooled using the random effects model.

RESULTS

Of the 53 articles that were identified, 44 were excluded. Nine studies (including three randomized controlled and six observational) were eligible for inclusion. All of the included studies predominantly involved patients with arthritis or mucocutaneous features. There was significant reduction of the SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) among MTX-treated patients when compared with controls (p = 0.001, odds ratio (OR) 0.444, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.279 to 0.707). There was also significant reduction in the average dose of corticosteroids among MTX-treated patients when compared with controls (p = 0.001, OR 0.335, 95% CI 0.202 to 0.558). The effect of MTX on laboratory and serological markers, including erythrocyte sedimentation rate, anti-dsDNA and complement levels (C3 and C4), could not be determined because of the limited numbers of controlled trials.

CONCLUSION

The use of MTX is associated with significant reductions in SLEDAI and the average dose of corticosteroids in adult patients with SLE.

Lupus erythematosus: considerations about clinical, cutaneous and therapeutic aspects

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus is a chronic inflammatory disease with multifactorial etiology. Although clinical manifestations are varied, the skin is an important target-organ, which contributes to the inclusion of skin lesions in 4 out of the 17 new criteria for the diagnosis of the disease, according to the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics. The cutaneous manifestations of lupus are pleomorphic. Depending on their clinical characteristics, they can be classified into Acute Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus, Subacute Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus, Chronic Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus and Intermittent Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus. Treatment is based on preventive measures, reversal of inflammation, prevention of damage to target organs and relief of adverse events due to pharmacological therapy. The most commonly used treatment options are topical, systemic and surgical treatment, as well as phototherapy. The correct handling of the cases depends on a careful evaluation of the morphology of the lesions and the patient's general status, always taking into consideration not only the benefits but also the side effects of each therapeutic proposal.

Chilblain lupus erythematosus

Chilblain lupus erythematosus is a rare form of chronic cutaneous lupus erythematosus. It is characterised by purple plaques/nodules and oedematous skin mainly around the acral regions of the body, which are most exposed to the cold. In this paper we report a case of chilblain lupus erythematosus that was diagnosed using the Mayo Clinic Diagnostic Criteria and its successful treatment with hydroxychloroquine.

Cutaneous lupus erythematosus: diagnosis and treatment

Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) encompasses a wide range of dermatologic manifestations, which may or may not be associated with the development of systemic disease. Cutaneous lupus is divided into several sub-types, including acute CLE (ACLE), sub-acute CLE (SCLE) and chronic CLE (CCLE). CCLE includes discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE), LE profundus (LEP), chilblain cutaneous lupus and lupus tumidus. The diagnosis of these diseases requires proper classification of the sub-type, through a combination of physical examination, laboratory studies, histology, antibody serology and occasionally direct immunofluorescence, while ensuring to exclude systemic disease. The treatment of cutaneous lupus consists of patient education on proper sun protection along with appropriate topical and systemic agents. Systemic agents are indicated in cases of widespread, scarring or treatment-refractory disease. In this chapter, we discuss issues in classification and diagnosis of the various sub-types of CLE, as well as provide an update on therapeutic management.