Treatment of refractory erosive oral lichen planus with extracorporeal photochemotherapy: 12 cases

Lichen Planus: What is New in Diagnosis and Treatment?

Lichen planus (LP), an idiopathic, multifaceted chronic inflammatory disease with a heterogeneous clinical presentation, affects approximately 0.5-1% of the population. The various clinical manifestations of LP fall into three broad categories, namely cutaneous, appendageal, and mucosal, with further subclassification depending on the morphology and distribution patterns of individual lesions. There is mounting evidence that LP has systemic associations, including autoimmune conditions, glucose intolerance, dyslipidemia, and cardiovascular disorders. Cutaneous hypertrophic and mucosal forms of LP are at a heightened risk for malignant transformation. Familiarity with these potential associations in conjunction with long-term follow-up and regular screening could lead to a timely diagnosis and management of concomitant conditions. In addition, the frequent quality of life (QoL) impairment in LP underscores the need for a comprehensive approach including psychological evaluation and support. Several treatment strategies have been attempted, though most of them have not been adopted in clinical practice because of suboptimal benefit-to-risk ratios or lack of evidence. More recent studies toward pathogenesis-driven treatments have identified Janus kinase inhibitors such as tofacitinib, phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitors such as apremilast, and biologics targeting the interleukin-23/interleukin-17 pathway as novel therapeutic options, resulting in a dramatic change of the treatment landscape of LP. This contemporary review focuses on the diagnosis and management of LP, and places emphasis on more recently described targeted treatment options.

Extracorporeal Photopheresis in Dermatological Diseases

Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is an apheresis procedure that is conventionally used as a first-line treatment for cutaneous and leukemic subtypes of T-cell lymphoma, such as Sezary's syndrome and mycosis fungoides. Over the past three decades, its immunotherapeutic properties have been tested on a variety of autoimmune conditions, including many dermatologic diseases. There is ample evidence of ECP's ability to modify leukocytes and alter cytokine production for certain dermatologic diseases that have been refractory to first-line treatments, such as atopic dermatitis. However, the evidence on the efficacy of ECP for the treatment of these dermatologic diseases is unclear and/or lacks sufficient evidence. The purpose of this paper is to review the literature on the utilization and clinical efficacy of ECP in the treatment of several [autoimmune] dermatologic diseases and discuss its applications, guidelines, recommendations, and future implementation for dermatologic diseases.

Lichen Planus

Lichen planus (LP) is a T cell-mediated disease affecting the stratified squamous epithelia of the skin and/or mucus membrane. Histologically, the disease is characterized by a lichenoid inflammatory infiltrate and vacuolar degeneration of the basal layer of the epidermis. LP has three major subtypes: Cutaneous, mucosal and appendageal LP. Rarely, it may affect the nails in the absence of skin and/or mucosal changes. LP may also be induced by several drugs, typically anti-hypertensive medication or be associated with infections, particularly viral hepatitis. The diagnosis is based on the clinical presentation and characteristic histological findings. Although the disease is often self-limiting, the intractable pruritus and painful mucosal erosions result in significant morbidity. The current first-line treatment are topical and/or systemic corticosteroids. In addition, immunosuppressants may be used as corticosteroid-sparing agents. These, however are often not sufficient to control disease. Janus kinase inhibitors and biologics (anti-IL-12/23, anti-IL17) have emerged as novel future treatment options. Thus, one may expect a dramatic change of the treatment landscape of LP in the near future.

Oral Lichen Planus - Related Connection with HLA-System Antigens

AIM

To determine whether there is an immunogenic connection and antigen difference between the HLA antigens in the erosive (EOLP) and reticular (ROLP) oral lichen planus.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

73 patients with ROLP and EOLP have been tested. Typing of the HLA antigens has been made for locus A and B. The typing of the HLA was conducted with the use of microlymphocyto toxic test by Terasaki. The reading of the findings has been conducted with an inverse microscope. When a reaction has 4 points it is considered to be positive.

RESULTS

The most frequently typified antigens in ROLP from locus A are HLA А2 (57.57%) and А3 (33.33)%, and for locus B 21.21%. In EOLP it is А9 (8888%). In locus B a connection has been found with HLA B8 (77.77%). The statistical analysis with the ×2 test has shown that the carriers of HLA A9 display a relative risk (RR) of 3.65 and ×2=20.72. Consequently, there is high static importance for locus A p<0,001. For locus B, In EOLP for HLA B8, RR=6. 7 ×2=37.64 and p<0,001. ROLP has shown association with HLA A3, where RR=2. 31 and ×2 =9.14 and p<0.05.

CONCLUSIONS

In ROLP A3 antigen and in EOLP A9 and A8 may be considered as carriers with proneness to OLP.

Photobiomodulation Therapy/Photodynamic Therapy Versus Steroid Therapy for Oral Lichen Planus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective: To evaluate the efficiency of photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) or photodynamic therapy (PDT) in treating oral lichen planus (OLP) as well as identifiy the side effects when compared with steroid therapy. Background: Nowadays, PBMT and PDT are increasingly applied for treating OLP with minimal adverse effects. Methods: The electronic databases of PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trial, Web of Science, and Embase were searched until March 13, 2020. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 1 month of follow-up period were selected. Two reviewers extracted data from selected studies independently. Cochrane collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias was used for assessing the quality of the RCTs. The random-effects model was employed for meta-analysis. Results: One thousand fifteen studies were initially identified. Finally, nine RCTs were included for quality assessment and seven studies for meta-analysis. Four RCTs were of unclear risk of bias and five were assessed as high risk of bias. The comparison showed no significant differences for pain scores [visual analog scale (VAS)] [mean differences (MD) = 0.38, confidence interval (CI) = 95% -0.64 to 1.40] and severity scores (reticular-atrophic-erosive scores) (MD = 1.67, CI = 95% -1.13 to 4.46) between topical corticosteroid therapy and PBMT after 1 month. For PDT, no significant differences were observed for sign scores (Thongprasm sign scoring) (MD = -0.31, CI = 95% -1.52 to 0.91) and pain scores (VAS) (MD = -2.30, CI = 95% -5.88 to 1.28) of the lesions when compared with topical corticosteroid therapy after 1 month of follow-up period. One study reported the discomfort of the affected area in patients of the PDT group when probe tip was moved. Conclusions: PBMT and PDT could be reliable alternatives to topical corticosteroids for OLP with no or less severe complications in a short-term period. However, further well-designed RCTs with long-term period are recommended to consolidate the conclusions in this regard.

European dermatology forum: Updated guidelines on the use of extracorporeal photopheresis 2020 - Part 2

Background

Following the first investigational study on the use of extracorporeal photopheresis for the treatment of cutaneous T‐cell lymphoma published in 1983, this technology has received continued use and further recognition for additional earlier as well as refractory forms. After the publication of the first guidelines for this technology in the JEADV in 2014, this technology has maintained additional promise in the treatment of other severe and refractory conditions in a multidisciplinary setting. It has confirmed recognition in well‐known documented conditions such as graft‐vs.‐host disease after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation, systemic sclerosis, solid organ transplant rejection including lung, heart and liver and to a lesser extent inflammatory bowel disease.

Materials and methods

In order to further provide recognized expert practical guidelines for the use of this technology for all indications, the European Dermatology Forum (EDF) again proceeded to address these questions in the hands of the recognized experts within and outside the field of dermatology. This was done using the recognized and approved guidelines of EDF for this task. All authors had the opportunity to review each contribution as it was added.

Results and conclusion

These updated 2020 guidelines provide at present the most comprehensive available expert recommendations for the use of extracorporeal photopheresis based on the available published literature and expert consensus opinion. The guidelines were divided into two parts: PART I covers Cutaneous T‐cell lymphoma, chronic graft‐vs.‐host disease and acute graft‐vs.‐host disease, while PART II will cover scleroderma, solid organ transplantation, Crohn’s disease, use of ECP in paediatric patients, atopic dermatitis, type 1 diabetes, pemphigus, epidermolysis bullosa acquisita and erosive oral lichen planus.

Update on treatments for erosive vulvovaginal lichen planus

Vulvovaginal lichen planus (VVLP) is a debilitating disease that causes significant pain and psychological distress. Management is made difficult by the chronic course of the disease and its resistance to treatment. While topical steroids have been accepted as the first-line treatment, they fail to achieve symptomatic control in approximately 40% of patients. Second-line therapies include other topical treatments such as calcineurin inhibitors, systemic therapies including oral steroids, methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil, biologics, and tacrolimus, and procedural options including surgery and dilation, photodynamic therapy, and ultrasound. This review provides an overview of the current treatments and explores the level of evidence supporting each of them.

Oral lichen planus: A disease or a spectrum of tissue reactions? Types, causes, diagnostic algorhythms, prognosis, management strategies

Oral lichen planus and lichenoid lesions comprise a group of disorders of the oral mucosa that likely represent a common reaction pattern to 1 or more unknown antigens. The coexistence of hyperkeratotic striation/reticulation, varying degrees of mucosal inflammation from mild erythema to severe widespread ulceration, and a band-like infiltrate of mononuclear inflammatory cells including activated T lymphocytes, macrophages, and dendritic cells, are considered suggestive of oral lichen planus and lichenoid lesions. Several classification systems of oral lichen planus and lichenoid lesions have been attempted, although none seem to be comprehensive. In this paper, we present a classification of oral lichen planus and lichenoid lesions that includes oral lichen planus, oral lichenoid contact lesions, oral lichenoid drug reactions, oral lichenoid lesions of graft vs. host disease, discoid lupus erythematosus, and systemic lupus erythematosus, lichen planus-like variant of paraneoplastic pemphigus/paraneoplastic autoimmune multiorgan syndrome, chronic ulcerative stomatitis, lichen planus pemphigoides, solitary fixed drug eruptions, and lichen sclerosus. We present the clinical and diagnostic aspects of oral lichen planus and lichenoid lesions, and discuss related treatment options.

[Efficacy of photopheresis in the treatment of erosive lichen planus: A retrospective study]

INTRODUCTION

Erosive lichen planus of the skin and mucosa is an invalidating disease that impacts the quality of life of patients and for which there is no codified treatment. Herein we report retrospective efficacy data for extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) in the treatment of erosive lichen planus in 11 patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We treated 10 women and 1 man with PCE for erosive lichen planus refractory on average to two previous treatments. PCE was administered in two sessions on two successive days every two weeks at the start of treatment, followed by more widely spaced cycles. The primary evaluation criterion was partial or complete clinical efficacy.

RESULTS

PCE had a positive effect on all 11 patients. We noted 6 complete remissions and 5 partial remissions. Complete remission was achieved within a mean 5.5 months, with improvement in symptoms occurring earlier. Relapse was frequent during the intervals between PCE sessions and on discontinuation of treatment but resumption of PCE once again proved effective.

DISCUSSION

Our study supports the data in the literature from 28 published cases. Treatment efficacy and improvement in symptoms were rapidly apparent. PCE is generally a well-tolerated treatment, with only one patient dropping out of our study, but it imposes certain scheduling, technical and cost constraints. These constraints and the frequency of relapse underscore the question of treatment duration. The initial therapeutic schedule for PCE does not appear to modify the times required to achieve remission of erosive lichen planus.

Biomolecules in the treatment of lichen planus refractory to corticosteroid therapy: Clinical and histopathological assessment

BACKGROUND

Local deficit of several biomolecules have been described in oral lichen planus (OLP). Such a deficit impairs cellular functions and cell-matrix communication.

PURPOSE

Assess the efficacy of the local application of autologous biomolecules in the treatment of erosive OLP.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this study, the use of plasma rich in growth factors (PRGF) as a source of blood-derived and autologous growth factors and proteins were tested in erosive oral lichen planus refractory to corticosteroids. Histopathological features of the disease were also analysed at the time of diagnosis. Clinical data were the number of recurrences and achievement of pain reduction and complete healing of the lesions. A total of 10 patients with erosive OLP refractory to treatment by corticosteroids were included in the study. All patients were females with a mean age of 48±12years.

RESULTS

A complete remission of the disease was achieved after one infiltration of PRGF in 8 patients. Only 2 patients required a total of 2 infiltrations to heal. Hydropic degeneration of the epithelium basal layer, band-like subepithelial lymphocytic infiltration and fibrin deposits in the epithelium were observed in all patients. Interestingly plasma cells were present in 2 patients. All patients presenting plasma cells healed after only one PRGF infiltration. However, 2 patients out of 6 (no plasma cells) required 2 infiltrations.

CONCLUSIONS

The local administration of autologous local factors could overcome the deficit of biomolecular clues and thus improve cell functions and restore cell-matrix communication.

Oral lichen planus

Lichen planus is an inflammatory mucocutaneous disease that can affect the skin, hair, nails, and mucosal surfaces. Mucosal sites of involvement include oral, genital, ocular, otic, esophageal, and, less commonly, bladder, nasal, laryngeal, and anal surfaces. Oral lichen planus is a mucosal variant of lichen planus, which tends to affect women more often than men, with a typically more chronic course and potential for significant morbidity. Treatment can be challenging, and there is potentially a low risk of malignant transformation; however, therapeutic benefits can be obtained with various topical and systemic medications. Clinical monitoring is recommended to ensure symptomatic control. Increasing awareness and recognition of this entity have continued to fuel advances in therapy and in our understanding of the disease.

Possible alternative therapies for oral lichen planus cases refractory to steroid therapies

Oral lichen planus (OLP) is a chronic inflammatory disorder with a multifactorial etiopathogenesis. Immune dysregulation plays a critical role in the development and progression of this disease. Patients' lives may be affected by pain caused by atrophic-erosive lesions. Given the obscure etiology, treatment is usually symptomatic. Topical steroids remain the mainstay of management. However, their therapeutic benefits are not always evident. There are substantial data on the possible therapeutic strategies that are effective in OLP cases refractory to steroids. This review provides an overview of the current approaches for the management of steroid-refractory OLP. The miscellaneous treatment regimens include tacrolimus, pimecrolimus, thalidomide, low-level laser therapy, photodynamic therapy, and surgical excision. Some results obtained from these studies were promising. However, further studies, especially randomized controlled trials with strict inclusion and exclusion criteria and larger sample sizes, are required for the evaluation of the long-term safety and efficacy of these therapies.

Extracorporeal photopheresis as a therapy for autoimmune diseases

Systemic autoimmune diseases (AID) have multiorgan, heterogeneous clinical presentations and are characterized by dysregulation of the immune system, immunodeficiency, irreversible organ damage and increased morbidity and mortality. Preventing or decreasing flares of AID correlate with durable disease control, significant reduction of inflammation and prevention of disability or therapy-related toxicity. There is an urgent need for better treatment of severe, therapy-refractory AID. Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is a cell-based immunomodulatory treatment which has been extensively used in variety of autoimmune disorders for the last two decades. ECP treatment is FDA approved for the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) with particularly promising results seen in graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT). Prolonged therapy is safe, well tolerated and allows reduction of systemic immunosuppression in therapy-refractory patients. Both clinical and experimental evidence suggest that ECP mechanism of action is characterized by apoptosis and phagocytosis of activated cells by antigen-presenting cells (APC), secretion of anti-inflammatory cytokines and stimulation of regulatory T cells (Tregs). The focus of this paper is to review the current evidence of ECP use in the treatment of AID. Here, we summarize the experience of nine major AID from 65 published reports. The key findings demonstrate substantial evidence of ECP feasibility, safety and in some AID also promising efficacy. However, the role of ECP in AID therapy is not established as most published studies are retrospective with limited number of patients and the trials are small or poorly standardized. The available data support future investigations of ECP as a therapeutic modality for the treatment of AID in well-designed prospective clinical studies. J

Guidelines on the use of extracorporeal photopheresis

BACKGROUND

After the first investigational study on the use of extracorporeal photopheresis for the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma was published in 1983 with its subsequent recognition by the FDA for its refractory forms, the technology has shown significant promise in the treatment of other severe and refractory conditions in a multi-disciplinary setting. Among the major studied conditions are graft versus host disease after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation, systemic sclerosis, solid organ transplant rejection and inflammatory bowel disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In order to provide recognized expert practical guidelines for the use of this technology for all indications the European Dermatology Forum (EDF) proceeded to address these questions in the hands of the recognized experts within and outside the field of dermatology. This was done using the recognized and approved guidelines of EDF for this task.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

These guidelines provide at present the most comprehensive available expert recommendations for the use of extracorporeal photopheresis based on the available published literature and expert consensus opinion.

Comparison of health-related quality of life of patients with different precancer and oral cancer stages

OBJECTIVES

Health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) informations are becoming an important tool for the treatment concept for cancer patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate how the quality of life depends on the disease severity of pre- and oral cancer patients and which factors influence their quality of life.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

During this study, 106 patients with a premalignant oral lesion, 174 patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSSC) as well as 21 patients with a recurrence of OSSC were asked about their oral health-related quality of life. Additionally, the UW-QOLv4 was used to record the psychological and clinical symptoms from which the patients of the three groups are suffering.

RESULTS

Significant differences with respect to oral HR-QoL of life between the groups could be evaluated. Patients with a recurrence have the lowest and patients with precancer the highest HR-QoL. Within the groups, there is a difference regarding the significance of the psychological factors. The lowest values were achieved for mood within all three groups. Anxiety is of key importance for the precancer group whereas appearance and activity are of importance for the patients having a tumor. The patients of the recurrence group are heavily affected by all factors.

CONCLUSIONS

The quality of life differs depending on the disease. The patients of the recurrence group have the lowest oral health-related quality of life for all aspects analyzed, and they are suffering the most with respect to the psychological dimensions of the UW-QOLv4.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The present study examined the quality of life depending on the severity of the disease of pre- and oral cancer patients and which factors significantly influenced their quality of life. The evaluated findings of relevant variables may have therapeutic relevance for the multidisciplinary treatment of oral cancer patients in the future.

Miscellaneous indications for extracorporeal photochemotherapy (ECP)

Extracorporeal photochemotherapy (ECP) has been applied to many T-cell mediated diseases where immunosuppressive drugs are insufficient or not tolerated. As ECP is mainly used in rare indications after failure of other therapies, controlled studies are hardly possible. In addition, the importance of the extracorporeal circuit imposes ethical doubts in organising sham ECP procedure, which explains the rarity of controlled double-blind studies. However, encouraging and even successful results have been reported in newly developed diabetes mellitus, erosive lichen planus, Crohn's disease, systemic sclerosis, nephrogenic fibrosing dermopathy, atopic dermatitis, rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematodes, psoriasis arthritis, cutaneous mucinosis, scleromyxoedema, pemphigus vulgaris, multiple sclerosis, eosinophilic fasciitis and in the prevention of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) restenosis. This article discusses the various levels of evidence in the above cited indications.

A case of cutaneous lichen sclerosus et atrophicus effectively treated by extracorporeal photochemotherapy

Lichen sclerosus et atrophicus (LSA) is an inflammatory disease that affects the genitals, which was first described by Hallopeau in 1887 and is of unknown etiology. Only 15% of patients have an associated extra-genital form, and 2.5% have an isolated extra-genital form. LSA treatment remains poorly codified and mostly empirical. Here, we report a case of LSA, of mainly cutaneous form, which was effectively treated using extracorporeal photochemotherapy (ECP). Remission was achieved quickly, after the fourth session, with excellent treatment tolerance. ECP is now recognized as an effective treatment for erosive lichen planus, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), and scleroderma. Thus, we began ECP treatment for our cases of LSA based on clinical and/or anatomopathological similarities between LSA and these commonly ECP-treated disorders. The fact that ECP is effective in LSA, GVHD, erosive lichen planus, and scleroderma strengthen the hypothesis that there is a common link between these four conditions.

Oral lichen planus

Oral lichen planus (OLP) is a chronic, immune-mediated condition commonly affecting middle-aged women. The cause of OLP remains obscure. Strict clinical and histologic criteria need to be met to arrive at a definite diagnosis, thereby ruling out other conditions that may mimic OLP clinically and/or histologically. Although OLP is considered a premalignant condition, the risk for neoplastic change seems low.

[Rationale for the use of extracorporeal photochemotherapy in children]

The management of immune diseases in children remains challenging, although significant advances have been made. In addition to pharmacological approaches, extracorporeal photochemotherapy (ECP) is distinctive in its ability to provide immunomodulation without immune suppression or toxicity. However, in practice, this therapy is not widely used because of logistical issues and the lack of robust clinical pediatric studies. Here, we discuss the potential clinical applications of ECP in children and emphasize the need for a rigorous and specifically pediatric clinical evaluation of ECP.

Cryopreservation of mononuclear cells before extracorporeal photochemotherapy does not impair their anti-proliferative capabilities

BACKGROUND AIMS

The clinical benefits of extracorporeal photochemotherapy (ECP) are well recognized, but its clinical use is limited by logistical difficulties, especially because of the need to perform repeated aphereses. The cryopreservation of mononuclear cells could allow maintenance of the ECP schedule while reducing the number of aphereses. The aim of this work was to assess whether previous cryopreservation impairs the immunomodulatory function of ECP-treated peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC).

METHODS

Fresh or previously cryopreserved PBMC were exposed to ECP and added on day 0 into a mixed leukocyte reaction. Proliferation of alloreactive lymphocytes was measured by carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester (CFSE) dye dilution. Apoptosis was quantified by annexin-7AAD staining.

RESULTS

ECP-induced apoptosis was slightly increased in cryopreserved cells but the kinetics of apoptosis were similar to fresh cells. Lymphocytes stimulated in the presence of ECP-treated PBMC displayed a significant decrease in proliferation. The suppression was enforced when ECP-treated cells had been activated previously by allogeneic stimulation. Cryopreservation before ECP exposure did not impact apoptosis triggering or anti-proliferative properties of ECP-treated cells.

CONCLUSIONS

Cryopreservation before ECP does not impair the immunomodulatory effects of treated cells. These data warrant investigation of the clinical use of cryopreserved PBMC for ECP.

[Four cases of photopheresis treatment for cutaneous lupus erythematosus refractory to standard therapy]

BACKGROUND

Photopheresis is a leucopheresis procedure in which cells are photoactivated by psoralen and then irradiated by ultraviolet A. We report four cases of women with refractory cutaneous lupus erythematosus (LE) who responded to this treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We treated one patient with subacute LE having a contraindication to antimalarials and to thalidomide and three patients with chronic LE (lupus panniculitis, lupus tumidus and disseminated discoid LE) refractory to treatment with hydroxychloroquine, chloroquine, thalidomide and dapsone, and also, in some cases, to oral and intravenous corticosteroids, methotrexate, colchicine, acitretine, sulfasalazine, mycophenolate mofetil and intravenous immunoglobulin. Treatment consisted of two 4-hour sessions fortnightly. Only antimalarials were continued during photopheresis.

RESULTS

Photopheresis had a positive effect on all four patients. We noticed complete remission in two patients and interruption of progression followed by partial remission in the other two after a mean delay of two to three months of treatment. All treatments other than antimalarials were stopped.

DISCUSSION

Photopheresis appears to be an effective treatment option in patients with cutaneous LE. Due to its high cost, it should nevertheless remain an exceptional therapeutic option restricted to patients with cutaneous LE resistant to standard therapy.

Pathophysiology, etiologic factors, and clinical management of oral lichen planus, part I: facts and controversies

Lichen planus (LP) is an inflammatory disease of the stratified squamous epithelia of unknown etiology. LP affects most frequently the oral mucosa, but it may also involve other mucosa and the skin. Oral LP (OLP) most frequently affects woman aged between 30 and 60 years. Histopathologic examination typically shows orthokeratotic hyperkeratosis, basal cell degeneration, and a dense well-defined infiltrate of lymphocytes in the superficial dermis. OLP lesions may result from the induction of keratinocytes apoptosis by cytotoxic CD8+ T cells stimulated by a yet unidentified self-antigen on a genetically predisposed patient. The association of OLP with hepatitis C virus (HCV) has been more consistently demonstrated in the Mediterranean area. Although HCV RNA and HCV-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells have been retrieved in the mucosal lesions of patients with chronic HCV infection and OLP, the eventual pathophysiology of HCV in OLP lesions remains unclear. Available treatments of OLP are not curative, and many have potentially prominent side effects. The objectives of OLP management should be to prevent and screen for malignant transformation and alleviate symptoms on the long-term. Avoidance of potential precipitating drugs, tobacco, alcohol, and local trauma, as well as strict oral hygiene, is essential. The first-line pharmacologic treatment relies on topical steroids. Systemic steroids should be limited to the short-term cure of severe refractory OLP. Life-long clinical follow-up, at least annually, is fundamental.

[Photopheresis: an alternative therapeutic approach in corticoresistant erosive oral lichen planus]

BACKGROUND

The immunomodulatory effect of extracorporeal photochemotherapy (photopheresis) coupled with its efficacy in lymphocytic skin diseases provides a rationale for its use for erosive lichen planus. We report two cases of chronic oral erosive and corticoresistant lichen planus successfully treated with photopheresis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Case 1. A 61-years-old man had erosive oral lichen planus for four years. Oral steroids were contra-indicated due to iatrogenic pancreatitis. After nine photopheresis sessions, subjective improvement occurred and the oral lesions were stabilized. Case 2. A 17-years-old woman presented corticodependent oral and genital erosive lichen planus and cutaneous lesions. After seven sessions of photopheresis, the patient was able to eat again and the pain decreased. After 20 sessions, the cutaneous lichen planus disappeared and complete remission of the mucous lesions was obtained without corticotherapy.

DISCUSSION

These two cases, together with 23 other cases reported elsewhere, strongly suggested the value of photopheresis in the treatment of erosive lichen planus. However, relapses after treatment withdrawal appear extremely frequent.