Investigating the disparities among drug categories in drug-induced dermatomyositis: A systematic review

Drug-induced dermatomyositis (DIDM) is a rare and underestimated variant of dermatomyositis (DM) characterized by muscle damage and skin rash and related to certain drug exposure. The spectrum of drugs causing DIDM has evolved over time, originally implicating hydroxyurea, penicillamine, and statins as causative agents. Tumor necrosis factor α inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors have also been associated with such conditions. To bridge the gap between current literature and clinical practice, and therefore guide clinicians, we conducted a comprehensive review of English literature from Pubmed, EMBASE, and MEDLINE. Our analysis included demographic data, clinical features, laboratory findings, therapeutic outcomes, and extant research pertaining to the probable pathogenesis of DIDM induced by various drugs. Furthermore, we categorized the drugs involved in DIDM cases into biologics and traditional agents for subsequent statistical analysis. Over time, there has been a gradual accumulation of reported DIDM cases. A total of 69 published DIDM cases were documented in our study, among which 33 should be attributed to biologics and the remaining 36 to traditional drugs. Interestingly, 41 of all DIDM cases had a previous history of malignancies. Additionally, DIDM cases exhibited similar cutaneous and muscular manifestations to classic DM, with the exception of cases induced by hydroxyurea, which did not entail muscle damage. Positive antinuclear antibodies and anti-TIF1-γ autoantibodies have been predominantly observed in biologics-induced cases, while positive anti-TIF1-γ antibodies were merely reported in the cases that were primarily diagnosed with malignant diseases and exposed to ICIs afterwards. Anti-TIF1-γ antibodies may potentially serve as a red flag in the identification of co-existing malignant diseases in DM patients. We also provided a comprehensive summary and exploration of potential mechanisms lying behind drug-induced dermatomyositis. In conclusion, our review consolidates the current literature on DIDM, highlighting the evolving spectrum of medications and elucidating the differences in clinical manifestations, laboratory findings, and underlying mechanisms.

Hydroxyurea-induced dermatomyositis: true amyopathic dermatomyositis or dermatomyositis-like eruption?

BACKGROUND

  Hydroxyurea-induced dermatomyositis is a rare adverse reaction of long-term hydroxyurea therapy. It has been reported under different names; however, the exact classification and nomenclature of this eruption have been the subject of much debate, and a more precise term is still awaiting. Herein, we review the different aspects of this reaction and suggest a new term that might help to minimize the confusion about its nomenclature.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We describe a 68-year-old woman who had been on long-term hydroxyurea therapy for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia for nine years. She presented with typical dermatomyositis-like lesions and many of the other mucocutaneous adverse effects of hydroxyurea.

RESULTS

Skin examination revealed typical Gottron's papules on the dorsa of the hands, atrophy, xerosis, acquired ichthyosis, photosensitivity, cutaneous, oral and nail hyperpigmentation, acral erythema, palmoplantar keratoderma, actinic keratoses, and leg ulcers. There was no clinical or laboratory evidence of proximal muscle weakness. Cessation of hydroxyurea was associated with remarkable improvement of the skin lesions.

CONCLUSION

Hydroxyurea-induced dermatomyositis is a rare drug-induced dermatomyositis characterized by skin lesions identical to classic dermatomyositis without clinical or laboratory evidence of myositis. We propose that the term hydroxyurea-induced amyopathic dermatomyositis that adequately describes the findings reported in this subset of patients would be more precise and specific.

Statins as a possible cause of inflammatory and necrotizing myopathies

BACKGROUND

Hydroxy-methyl-glutaryl Co-A reductase (HMGCR) inhibitors or statins are a well recognized cause of a variety of skeletal myopathic effects which generally resolve on stopping the medication. Recent reports, however, suggest that statins are associated with a unique autoimmune myopathy wherein symptoms persist or even progress after statin discontinuation and require immunosuppressive therapy. We performed a systematic review to examine the association of statins with inflammatory (dermatomyositis/polymyositis) and necrotizing myopathies.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Ovid and Scopus for English language articles addressing statin associated inflammatory and necrotizing myopathies. Given the paucity of cases, we extended the search to include articles in all languages.

RESULTS

The search yielded 14 articles reporting a possible association of statins with inflammatory myopathies describing 10 cases of polymyositis and 14 cases of dermatomyositis, and 4 articles reporting a possible association of statins with necrotizing myopathies describing 63 cases. One study identified a unique antibody directed against HMGCR in patients with necrotizing myopathy. Systemic immunosuppressive therapy was required in majority of these cases for resolution of symptoms.

CONCLUSION

Statins have recently been associated with a variety of inflammatory myopathies including polymyositis, dermatomyositis, and a necrotizing myopathy. The association of statins with necrotizing myopathy is strengthened by the discovery that the serum of some of these patients contains an anti-HMGCR antibody. This suggests that statins can cause or unmask an immune mediated myopathy.

Simvastatin-induced dermatomyositis in a 50-year-old man

Dermatomyositis (DM) is a rare inflammatory autoimmune disease for which an iatrogenic origin has been described in a few cases. The authors report a case of DM occurring after simvastatin intake. A 50-year-old male sought medical attention for a photodistributed rash and considerable muscular weakness present for 3 months. One year earlier, simvastatin had been introduced. Serum creatine kinase levels were elevated. Histological examination of a muscle biopsy was consistent with a diagnosis of DM. Investigation for neoplasia and associated autoimmune disease proved negative. All clinical and laboratory abnormalities diminished corticosteroid therapy (1 mg/kg/day). Case reports have suggested that lipid-lowering drugs, especially statins, could induce or reveal chronic muscle diseases. In statins myopathy, reduction of coenzyme Q has been discussed as a key mechanism. Our case of DM in a patient receiving simvastatin adds to the previous reported cases in the literature and highlights the potential role of statins as triggers of immune systemic diseases.