Measuring patient-relevant benefits in pruritus treatment: development and validation of a specific outcomes tool

Practical Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Chronic Kidney Disease-Associated Pruritus

Regulatory and clinical stakeholders are increasingly advocating for the use of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures; however, the use of PROs is still not widespread. Patient reports are often the best ways to diagnose and monitor the effect of treatment on symptoms when the symptoms are subjective, as with pruritus. While many PRO tools are available to assess the severity of pruritus and its impact on quality of life (e.g., sleep), these are not used in a consistent manner and their results may not translate into clinical action. In this article, we present an introduction to PROs and their use in the assessment of chronic kidney disease-associated pruritus, as well as a practical guide to some of the PRO tools currently available, to empower all members of the nephrology patient care team to use these tools appropriately for the benefit of the patient.

Cost-effectiveness and Quality of Specialized and Routine Care in a German Cohort of Patients with Chronic Pruritus

Chronic pruritus is a prevalent interdisciplinary symptom with a strong influence on health-related quality of life. Patients need extensive diagnostics and long-term treatment. This retrospective and prospective cohort study compared routine and university-based specialized care in terms of cost-effectiveness and patient benefit. Direct medical and non-medical costs and patient-reported outcomes (PRO; pruritus intensity, quality of life, treatment needs and benefits) were assessed. Data analyses were conducted using descriptive methods and non-parametric statistical tests. A total of 300 adult patients (54.3% female) participated in the study. Six months after the treatment start in a specialized German pruritus care unit, the total costs were significantly reduced (mean total costs 686 € vs 433 € per patient per half year (total cohort); p <  0.001; mean out-of-pocket costs 198 € vs 124 € per half year (total cohort), p <  0.001). Pruritus intensity (numerical rating  scale 5.3 vs 3.7, p < 0.001), quality of life (Dermatology Life Quality Index 8.9 vs 5.7, p < 0.001) and patient benefit (Patient Benefit Index Pruritus 1.2 vs 2.1, p < 0.001) improved significantly (total  cohort). The results of this study show, that treatment of chronic pruritus patients in a specialized itch centre leads to an improvement in patient  benefit and reduces the economic burden at the same time.

Introduction of a Specific Dermatological Rehabilitation Programme for Patients with Chronic Pruritus: A Pilot Study

Chronic pruritus is a common symptom, associated with several severe medical conditions, great psychological burden, and reduced quality of life. It also poses socio-economic challenges concerning patients' work loss and healthcare costs. In Germany, medical rehabilitation programmes represent an integral part of the medical care of patients with chronic inflammatory skin diseases. However, such programmes play only a rudimentary role in the treatment of other dermatological diseases, such as dermatological oncology, genetic skin diseases, and chronic pruritus. Therefore, a specific antipruritic dermatological rehabilitation programme was developed in cooperation between the Department of Dermatology of the Medical Rehabilitation Center Bad Bentheim and the Center for Chronic Pruritus of the University Hospital of Muenster, Germany. This prospective study compared short-term patient-reported outcomes (n = 121) at the beginning and end of the rehabilitation programme. The majority of subjects had chronic pruritus on primary diseased, inflamed skin. Significant improvements in pruritus intensity (p ≤ 0.001), quality of life (p ≤ 0.001), anxiety symptoms (p ≤ 0.001) and depression (p ≤ 0.001), as well as an overall patient-relevant benefit (Patient Benefit Index 2.6 ± 1.06) and treatment-related patients' satisfaction, were shown. This suggests that implementation of this standardized rehabilitation programme for treatment of patients with chronic pruritus was successful.

Development and validation of a tool for the assessment of benefit from treatment of allergic rhinitis in children and adolescents (PBI-AR-K)

Background

Allergic rhinitis (AR) is frequent in children and adolescents and can severely affect their lives. This article describes the development and validation of a questionnaire to assess treatment needs and benefits in children and adolescents, the PBI-AR-K, in a sample of patients receiving grass pollen sublingual immunotherapy.

Patients and methods

The PBI-AR-K was developed based on an open survey including children and adolescents and expert consensus between methodologists, patients, and physicians. The PBI-AR-K assesses patient needs before the treatment and perceived benefit during or at the end of a treatment. A weighted benefit score can be calculated ranging from 0 to 4 (4 = highest possible benefit). The validation was conducted in children (5–12 years) and adolescents (13–17 years) receiving sublingual immunotherapy. Subscales were developed based on factor analysis. Psychometric properties of items and scales were assessed with descriptive statistics, internal consistency, and convergent validity.

Results

The final PBI-AR-K consists of 19 items. For validation, data from 345 patients (mean age 11.1; 60.9% male; n = 223 children; n = 122 adolescents) was analysed. Factor analyses resulted in four subscales for children and three subscales for adolescents. The items with the highest importance ratings were about choice of leisure activities (mean value in children: 3.5) and about being free of AR symptoms (adolescents: 3.3). The weighted PBI-AR-K scores reflected considerable patient-reported benefit (2.08–2.82) in both children and adolescents. Internal consistency of all scales was good or acceptable. In the children’s sample, the global scale and three of four subscales were quite consistently correlated with convergent variables, while the subscale ‘treatment burden’ was significantly correlated only with change in average impairments due to rhinitis symptoms. The adolescents’ sample showed more inconsistent results with only change in rhinitis severity being significantly associate with all subscales.

Conclusion

The newly developed PBI-AR-K is a reliable and valid questionnaire for use in children; for the use in adolescents, it should be further elaborated.

Patients' perspective on supposedly patient-relevant process and outcome parameters: a cross-sectional survey within the 'PRO patients study'

BACKGROUND

To be able to make informed choices based on their individual preferences, patients need to be adequately informed about treatment options and their potential outcomes. This implies that studies measure the effects of care based on parameters that are relevant to patients. In a previous scoping review, we found a wide variety of supposedly patient-relevant parameters that equally addressed processes and outcomes of care. We were unable to identify a consistent understanding of patient relevance and therefore aimed to develop an empirically based concept including a generic set of patient-relevant parameters. As a first step we evaluated the process and outcome parameters identified in the scoping review from the patients' perspective.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional survey among German general practice patients. Ten research practices of Witten/Herdecke University supported the study. During a two-week period in the fall of 2020, patients willing to participate self-administered a short questionnaire. It evaluated the relevance of the 32 parameters identified in the scoping review on a 5-point Likert scale and offered a free-text field for additional parameters. These free-text answers were inductively categorized by two researchers. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Bivariate analyses were performed to determine whether there are any correlations between rating a parameter as highly relevant and patients' characteristics.

RESULTS

Data from 299 patients were eligible for analysis. All outcomes except 'sexuality' and 'frequency of healthcare service utilization' were rated important. 'Confidence in therapy' was rated most important, followed by 'prevention of comorbidity' and 'mobility'. Relevance ratings of five parameters were associated with patients' age and gender, but not with their chronic status. The free-text analysis revealed 15 additional parameters, 12 of which addressed processes of care, i.e., 'enough time in physician consultation'.

CONCLUSION

Patients attach great value to parameters addressing processes of care. It appears as though the way in which patients experience the care process is not less relevant than what comes of it. Relevance ratings were not associated with chronic status, but few parameters were gender- and age-related.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials Initiative, registration number: 1685.

Development of the Patient- and Observer-Reported PRUCISION Instruments to Assess Pruritus and Sleep Disturbance in Pediatric Patients with Cholestatic Liver Diseases

INTRODUCTION

Understanding how patients experience their disease is a vital step in optimal disease management, and patient- and observer-reported outcome (PRO and ObsRO, respectively) measures can add important details to clinical information that is obtained as novel treatments are developed. Instruments that measure meaningful symptoms and impacts from the perspective of pediatric patients with cholestatic liver disease or their caregivers are needed. This study aimed to identify salient concepts in pediatric cholestatic liver disease, develop novel PRO and ObsRO instruments, and establish the instruments' content validity.

METHODS

Relevant signs, symptoms, and impacts of cholestatic liver disease were identified through a literature review, interviews with expert clinicians, and concept elicitation interviews with children and caregivers of children who had progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis (PFIC), Alagille syndrome, biliary atresia, or primary sclerosing cholangitis. Additional cognitive debriefing interviews with patients and caregivers were performed to ensure that participants could understand the instructions, questions, and response scales of the PRO and ObsRO instruments, with modifications made as necessary to improve comprehension and/or usability.

RESULTS

A total of 36 interviews with patients and caregivers were conducted. Pruritus and sleep disturbance (e.g., difficulty falling or staying asleep due to itch) were identified as the most problematic symptom and significant impact, respectively, of the pediatric cholestatic liver diseases assessed. The ObsRO and PRO instruments, called PRUCISION, focus on these key disease features in the morning and evening. Several modifications were made to the draft instruments following cognitive interviews. The final PRUCISION PRO and ObsRO measures are designed as an electronic diary to be completed twice daily. The response scales include pictorial, verbal, and numeric scales.

CONCLUSION

Novel PRO and ObsRO PRUCISION instruments were created that evaluate the patient experience of cholestatic pruritus in children with PFIC and other cholestatic liver diseases. The content validity of the PRUCISION instruments is established.

Skin Lesions, Skin Care, and Characteristics of Pruritus in Patients Undergoing Haemodialysis

INTRODUCTION

Pruritus has been shown to be a common and burdensome complaint in the general population. In some diseases, there is an even higher rate and intensity of pruritus such as in chronic kidney diseases. In particular, patients requiring dialysis commonly suffer from pruritus with proportions between 22.0 and 90.0%. Few data on the characteristics and burden of such pruritus have been published. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the extent and profiles of pruritus in such patients related to skin lesions and care.

METHODS

A non-interventional cross-sectional study in 14 centres for haemodialysis across Germany was conducted. The survey explored the prevalence, severity, and resulting burden of pruritus and skin lesions.

RESULTS

In total, 302 patients with uraemia (56.5% male, mean age 66.0 ± 14.4 years, mean duration of dialysis 3.9 ± 4.8 years) were included. Skin lesions appeared since start of dialysis in 50.0% of patients, with xerosis (94.7%) and desquamation (25.8%) being the most frequent and disturbing findings. Pruritus was reported by 60.9% of patients undergoing dialysis with a current mean numerical rating scale of 5.1 ± 2.4 occurring most frequently in the back, legs, and arms. About 89.0% of patients with xerosis and 69.0% with desquamation reported self-medication. However, only 40.0% and 28.0% sought medical help, respectively, indicating a remarkable lack of healthcare.

DISCUSSION

The current data suggest a more intensive focus on the skin symptoms and signs related to uraemia in the patients with dialysis and thus underline claims from a previous German large-scale study. Recommendations for early treatment and prevention of skin lesions in dialysis patients should be developed. Further research should be conducted focusing on recognizing subgroups of patients of particular vulnerability to pruritus and skin lesions, which may facilitate identifying patients at risk in an early moment. Moreover, a more specific tool for screening of skin lesions as well as pruritus may be useful since the existing instruments lack such specificity.

Measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures for pruritus: An updated systematic review

This systematic review aims to provide an update on measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures for pruritus. A Medline literature search was conducted to update the systematic review published by Schoch et al. in 2017 and to identify new validation studies published between October 2015 and July 2019. The methodological quality of validation studies was assessed based on the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist and the measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures were evaluated. Nineteen new studies were included and added to the 22 studies identified in the previously published review. Evidence from all 41 studies evaluating 38 different measures was summarized. Outcome measures were mapped to one of three constructs where possible: pruritus intensity, pruritus severity, pruritus-specific health-related quality of life. COSMIN rating revealed mixed results with deficiencies in methodological quality of many studies across all constructs. The most appropriate pruritus severity measure was the "Itch Severity Scale". "Itchy Quality of Life" and the disease-specific "Uremic Pruritus in Dialysis Scale" achieved most promising results considering the construct pruritus-specific health-related quality of life. For pruritus intensity, nine measures performed similarly well.

Secukinumab effects on disease burden, patient needs and benefits, and treatment satisfaction in patients with plaque psoriasis across European regions: patient perspective data from the PROSE study

BACKGROUND

Cross-cultural differences in healthcare policies and patient-physician communication may influence the quality of care and patients' perceived benefits and satisfaction with psoriasis treatment.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the disease burden and patient needs at baseline, and patient benefits and satisfaction with secukinumab treatment across Europe.

METHODS

PROSE was an open-label, prospective, non-randomized, stratified multicentre study of 52 weeks of secukinumab treatment, in 16 European countries. Secondary analysis of the PROSE study data by European regions was performed to identify cross-cultural differences in disease burden and patient needs at baseline, and in clinical improvement, patient-reported treatment benefits and satisfaction at 52 weeks post-treatment.

RESULTS

At baseline, Dermatology Life Quality Index impairment was reported to be greater in patients from Eastern Europe (EE: 15.4 ± 7.1) vs. Northern Europe (NE: 13.3 ± 6.7) and Western Europe (WE: 13.6 ± 6.9), but while differences were statistically significant (F-test = 5.5, P < 0.001), their clinical significance is uncertain. There were no significant differences between regions in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index at baseline (F-test = 1.6). There were considerable differences in patients' needs (Patient Need Questionnaire) between geographical regions, with WE focused more on reducing physical impairment [vs. Southern Europe (SE)/EE], EE on reducing social impairment (vs. NE/WE) and SE on reducing impairment due to therapy (vs. NE/WE). At Week 52, patients from EE reported more benefits (Patient Benefit Index) with secukinumab treatment (vs. WE/SE), while patients from NE reported higher global treatment satisfaction (vs. SE).

CONCLUSIONS

Differences in patients' needs and treatment satisfaction across Europe are likely a result of diverse medical systems, socio-economic status and infrastructural access. A patient-centred approach to treating psoriasis may fulfil patient needs and maximize treatment satisfaction. (NCT02752776).

Development and preliminary validation of the patient-reported Chronic Itch Burden Scale assessing health-related quality of life in chronic pruritus

BACKGROUND

Chronic pruritus (CP) significantly affects patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Very few self-reported HRQoL questionnaires exploring CP have been developed according to international guidelines, thus limiting their use in preauthorization trials.

OBJECTIVES

To develop a self-reported HRQoL questionnaire in patients with CP owing to psoriasis, atopic dermatitis, seborrhoeic dermatitis of the scalp or idiopathic dermatitis, and to explore the preliminary psychometric properties of the questionnaire.

METHODS

The study was performed in France. A conceptual framework was developed based on a structured literature review and expert insight, and was improved using three focus groups involving 19 participants. A 50-item questionnaire was created and tested with 21 participants using cognitive debriefings; 11 items were removed. A cross-sectional study including 251 participants was performed to explore the preliminary psychometric properties of the 39-item questionnaire. Dimensionality was explored using principal component analysis. Cronbach's alpha and correlation coefficients (interitem, item-total score and item-dimension score) were measured. The number of items was reduced through expert consensus.

RESULTS

In the 39-item version, three main dimensions were identified (Cronbach's alpha = 0·94) and all correlation coefficients were > 0·34. Upon review, 13 items were deleted owing to poor quality and six items were deleted by the team, generating a 20-item version. The questionnaire's factorial structure was best reflected with a two-dimension solution, i.e. (i) social and emotional repercussions and (ii) relation to others, fear of judgement.

CONCLUSIONS

The Chronic Itch Burden Scale patient-reported questionnaire explores broad aspects of HRQoL that are relevant for patients with various skin diseases. Its good cross-sectional validity makes it useful for trials and practitioners.

The burden in chronic prurigo: patients with chronic prurigo suffer more than patients with chronic pruritus on non-lesional skin: A comparative, retrospective, explorative statistical analysis of 4,484 patients in a real-world cohort

BACKGROUND

Chronic prurigo (CPG) is known as a high burdensome disease characterized by severe pruritus and multiple pruriginous lesions. Interestingly, the disease-specific burden is not well established and there are no data which compare the impact of CPG with chronic pruritus (CP) on non-lesional skin (CP-NL).

OBJECTIVES

To address this issue, we analysed datasets from 4484 patients with either CPG or CP-NL.

METHODS

Demographic medical data and additional information collected by validated patient reported outcome tools were analysed. The visual analogue scale and numerical rating scale (NRS) were used for assessing the pruritus intensity, the ItchyQoL for patients' quality of life, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and the Patient Needs Questionnaire' as a part of Patient Benefit Index for Pruritus for measuring the importance of 27 patient needs in terms of treatment goals. The Neuroderm questionnaire was used to assess the history of pruritus characteristics and the impact on sleep.

RESULTS

Patients with CPG suffered longer and with a higher intensity from pruritus [NRS worst the last 24 h, CPG 6.0 (4.0;8.0) vs. CP-NL 3.0 (5.0;7.0), P < 0.001]. In them, pruritus occurred more often and the whole day and night which led to more loss in sleeping hours [CPG 3.0 h (2.0;4.0) vs. CP-NL 2.0 h (1.0;4.0), P < 0.001]. Patients with CPG showed higher scores for depression [HADS-D, CPG 6.0 (3.0;10.0) vs. CP-NL 5.0 (2.0;8.0), P < 0.001], more impaired quality of life [ItchyQol; CPG: 72.6 (61.6;83.6) vs. CP-NL 59.4 (48.4;70.4), P < 0.001] and higher weighted needs in the predefined treatment goals.

DISCUSSION

Not only the presence of severe pruritus and pruriginous lesions but also sleep disorders and other mental symptoms may contribute to a higher burden in patients with CPG when compared with patients with CP-NL.

Patient-relevant outcomes: what are we talking about? A scoping review to improve conceptual clarity

Background

With respect to patient-centered care, measuring care effects based on patient-relevant outcomes is becoming increasingly important. There is some uncertainty about what outcomes are particularly relevant to patients and who determines their relevance. To determine this, we conducted a scoping review of the international literature with the aim to improve the conceptual clarity regarding (1) the terminology used for supposedly patient-relevant outcomes, (2) the variety of outcomes considered patient-relevant, and (3) justifications for the choice of these specific outcomes.

Methods

We conducted a systematic search in Embase, PubMed (including Medline), Cochrane Central, Scopus, and Google Scholar with a special focus on article titles. Search terms included patient-relevant, patient-important, patient-preferred, and outcome(s), endpoint(s), parameter(s), indicator(s). We limited the search period from January 2000 to July 2019. Full-text articles reporting outcomes that were described as patient-relevant met the inclusion criteria. Two researchers independently analyzed all eligible articles applying quantitative and structuring content analysis.

Results

We identified 155 articles, 44 of which met the inclusion criteria. A content analysis revealed 35 different terms used with regard to patient-relevant outcomes. However, authors predominantly referred to patient-important outcomes (23 articles, 52.3%) and patient-relevant outcomes (17 articles, 38.6%). A structuring content analysis of all extracted outcomes revealed a total of 281 codes, pooled in 32 inductive categories. Among these, the following categories dominated: symptoms, adverse events/complications, survival/mortality, pain. In just 16 of the articles (36.4%), authors provided justifications for the choice of the outcome being based either on patient and/or expert opinions. In another 13 articles (29.5%), no justification was provided.

Conclusion

This scoping review on patient-relevant outcomes was driven by the questions (1) what outcomes are particularly relevant to patients, and (2) who determines their relevance. We found a wide range of supposedly patient-relevant outcomes, with only one third of articles involving patients in the justification of the outcome selection. In view of this conceptual uncertainty it appears difficult to determine or even to compare a particular patient benefit of interventions. A set of generic outcomes relevant to patients would be helpful to contribute to a consistent understanding of patient relevance.

When life is an itch: What harms, helps, and heals from the patients' perspective? Differences and similarities among skin diseases

Itch is the commonest skin-related symptom, associated with a high psychosocial and economic burden. While the main focus of itch research lies on a few chronic skin diseases, only little is known about the perception of itch, itch-aggravating/-relieving factors and treatment preferences in patients with acute and chronic itch of various etiology. In this cross-sectional study, we assessed these aspects in 126 patients (mean age 61.7 ± 18.4 years, 67 females, median itch duration 3.9 years) using a 78-item questionnaire. The diseases were categorized into 11 diagnostic groups for descriptive analysis; the three most frequent groups ("atopic dermatitis," "nonatopic eczema," "inflammatory dermatoses") were statistically compared. Itch was most often perceived as localized 42.9%, burning (40.5%), and worrying (39.7%) with worsening in the evening (49.2%), due to warmth (42.1%) and sweating (26.2%). While itch perception, itch-aggravating factors and treatment preferences differed broadly among patients, the itch-relieving personal strategies were more uniform ("scratching by hand 70.6%, applying topicals 57.9%). Also, 69.8% of patients suffered from itch-related sleep disturbance, consequently affecting their relatives in 30.0%. Subgroup comparisons revealed significant differences regarding itch-aggravating factors (P = .0012) and itch duration (P = .0082). Patients rated the antipruritic effectiveness of phototherapy, "complementary and alternative medicine" and "other tablets" as high, but oral antihistamines, "cortisone tablets" and any topical as only moderately efficacious. The preferred administration of an ideal itch treatment was "creams/ointments" (51.6%) or "tablets" (35.7%), only few patients preferred "injections" or "patches." Consideration of such differences and similarities in itch characteristics and treatment preferences could help to better tailor treatment in itch patients.

Development and Initial Psychometric Properties of Two Itch-Related Measures: Scratch Intensity and Impact, Sleep-Related Itch and Scratch

Self-report measures are needed to better understand the relationships among sleep, itching, scratching, and chronic itch conditions and their associations with disease severity, QOL, health, and functioning. Two scales related to sleep and/or scratch were recently developed and assessed in 137 patients with chronic itch and atopic dermatitis or psoriasis. The Scratch Intensity and Impact Scale consisted of two factors (scratching intensity and impact of scratching on QOL) that accounted for 64.59% of the variance with a total of 13 items, overall Cronbach's α of 0.93, and test-retest reliability of 0.66. The Sleep-Related Itch and Scratch Scale consisted of one factor that accounted for 63.01% of the variance with a total of 16 items, overall Cronbach's α of 0.98, and test-retest reliability of 0.66. Both measures demonstrated significant correlations with each other as well as other itch-related measures and nonsignificant correlations with scales hypothesized to be unrelated. The final measures demonstrated adequate preliminary psychometric characteristics. It is hoped that these scales will be used for future research and clinical purposes to help fill recognized gaps in understanding about sleep, itch, scratching, atopic dermatitis, and psoriasis.

Characterizing treatment-related patient needs in atopic eczema: insights for personalized goal orientation

BACKGROUND

Atopic eczema (AE) is a common and burdensome chronic skin disease. Clinical guidelines suggest an evidence-based, personalized and stepwise treatment approach. Only few studies have so far focused on the specific patient needs in treatment.

OBJECTIVES

To characterize therapeutic needs of patients with AE in routine care.

METHODS

Nationwide cross-sectional study in 91 dermatology practices and outpatient clinics. Descriptive statistics were used for valuation. Comparisons of HRQoL and general health status were performed including subgroups (age, gender and disease duration). Group comparisons of patient needs were performed for age groups, gender and disease duration. Correlations between patients' needs (PNQ) and HRQoL, generic health status and severity were tested. In addition, a hierarchical regression analysis was performed to determine which variables contribute to explain the variance in patient needs.

RESULTS

Analysis of 1678 patients (60.5% female, mean age 38.35 ± 15.92 years) revealed a high disease burden with mean SCORAD of 42.26 ± 18.63, mean DLQI of 8.49 ± 6.45 and mean EQ VAS of 63.62 ± 21.98. Among the patient needs that were most frequently rated as 'quite important'/'very important' were as follows: 'to be free of itching' (96.0%), 'to get better skin quickly' (87.7%) and 'to be healed of all skin defects' (85.7%). In general, older people, women and patients who had been diagnosed with AE for 1 year or less rated the treatment needs as more important than younger patients, men and patients who had been diagnosed with AE for more than 1 year. Major determinants of higher needs were skin-related quality of life impairments, higher disease severity and higher age.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with AE show a high number and variety of therapeutic needs related to disease signs and symptoms, which are associated with individual disease burden. The patient needs vary substantially according to patient characteristics. Identification of patient-specific needs may support personalized, patient-centred care and shared decision-making.

Development and validation of the Patient Benefit Index for peripheral arterial disease

Background

The aim of this study was to develop and validate a specific Patient Benefit Index (PBI) version for the treatment of peripheral arterial disease (PAD).

Patients and methods

A non-interventional longitudinal development study was conducted. The first phase comprised a qualitative pre-study with n = 50 patients, in which the PBI was adapted for peripheral arterial disease. The resulting Patient Benefit Index for peripheral arterial disease (PBI-PAD) was validated in the second phase at two points of measurement. The total PBI-PAD score was calculated by weighting item-wise the achievement of treatment goals with the initially assessed needs. Feasibility, internal consistency, and construct validity were analysed and the generic three level version of the EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire (EQ-5D-3L) and the disease-specific instrument Vascular Quality of Life Questionnaire (VascuQoL) were used for convergent validation.

Results

In the pre-study, the PBI-PAD, consisting of 12 items, was developed. N = 103 patients participated in the main study. At T2, data were available for n = 57 patients. Mean age was 71.0 years ± 9.1 and 66.7 % of the participants were male. The amount of missing values of the PBI-PAD score was low (< 4.0 %) and no relevant floor effects were observed. Both parts of the PBI (needs at T1 and benefits at T2) were internally consistent with Cronbach’s alpha > 0.7. PBI-PAD total score correlated significantly with the T2-T1-differences of the EuroQol-visual analogue scale (EQ VAS) (r = 0.4, p = 0.007) and the Vascular Quality of Life Questionnaire (r = 0.5, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

The PBI-PAD is a feasible, internally consistent, and valid instrument to assess patient-relevant benefits in PAD patients receiving minimally invasive treatment or surgical procedures. It can be recommended for use in routine care as well as in clinical studies.

Management of chronic pruritus: from the dermatological office to the specialized itch center: a review

Patient care for those affected by chronic pruritus is remarkably complex due to its high prevalence and multifactorial nature. It requires a comprehensive assessment of the patient's medical history, extensive diagnostic procedures, and long treatment duration, including management of possible accompanying disorders such as sleep disturbances and mental distress. It is important to prioritize patient's needs when developing a therapeutic treatment plan. Standardized questionnaires and scales should be used to better analyze the patient history, quality of life, symptom intensity, and course of treatment. These can be distributed via digital platforms, allowing for more effective communication between the treating agents and gathering of large volumes of data in central databases. In today's health care system, it is essential for physicians with itch-related specializations and specialized itch centers to cooperate. It is thus crucial to focus efforts on the further development of specialized treatment centers and training courses for medical practitioners. There are, however, various regulatory and economic barriers to overcome in the modern health care system before patients with chronic pruritus can be offered the best possible care. Accordingly, health care authorities should be made aware of the difficulties associated with the management of chronic pruritus and of the high individual and societal burden it represents.

[Chronic pruritus : Care in daily practice]

Chronic pruritus is a highly prevalent, multifactorial symptom requiring extensive diagnostics, treatment and consideration of accompanying symptoms (reduced quality of life, sleep disorders, psychic factors). Patient care is thus complex and requires consideration of individual treatment goals. Patients indicate their wish for a symptom-free life an explanation of the causes and a trustful physician-patient relationship. The targeted use of questionnaires is thus advisable in order to structurally survey the history, pruritus intensity, quality of life and treatment progression. Nevertheless, there are many administrative and economical hurdles in the health care system to overcome in order to provide patients with chronic pruritus the best possible care, also per the recommended guidelines. The development of specialized centers and training courses for medical practitioners is thus urgently needed.

Assessment of severity and burden of pruritus

Chronic pruritus is a complex multifactorial symptom associated with many different diseases that represents a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge for physicians. In order to better manage chronic pruritus, a detailed medical history, individualized diagnostic procedures and treatment approaches are necessary. Treatment should not only take itch into consideration, but also scratching-induced skin lesions and accompanying disorders such as anxiety, depression and insomnia. Various standardized questionnaires and scales have been developed to assist in the characterization and assessment of these parameters. Monodimensional scales (e.g. the visual analogue scale) represent a simple method for assessing pruritus intensity and are frequently used; however, they can easily be confounded and may indicate the level of satisfaction regarding the medical care provided rather than the itch course. The Dynamic Pruritus Score and Itch-Free Days questionnaire enable a closer assessment of patient responses to treatment. Because chronic pruritus has the potential to greatly impact the quality of life, it is important that physicians recognize it as a major issue. The Dermatology Quality of Life Index is an instrument that is used in a variety of dermatological conditions, but may be unsuitable for measuring pruritus of extracutaneous origin. The ItchyQol is a tool designed specifically for those suffering from pruritus. Additional tools, such as the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, take psychiatric comorbidities into consideration. Recommendations from European (EADV-based Task Force Pruritus) and international (International Forum for the Study of Itch) expert groups focusing on assessment instruments for chronic pruritus are also provided in this article.

Pruritus in Kidney Disease

Pruritus is a common and distressing symptom in patients with chronic kidney disease. The most recent epidemiologic data have suggested that approximately 40% of patients with end-stage renal disease experience moderate to severe pruritus and that uremic pruritus (UP) has a major clinical impact, being associated strongly with poor quality of life, impaired sleep, depression, and increased mortality. The pathogenesis of UP remains largely unclear, although several theories on etiologic or contributing factors have been proposed including increased systemic inflammation; abnormal serum parathyroid hormone, calcium, and phosphorus levels; an imbalance in opiate receptors; and a neuropathic process. UP can present somewhat variably, although it tends to affect large, discontinuous, but symmetric, areas of skin and to be most symptomatic at night. A variety of alternative systemic or dermatologic conditions should be considered, especially in patients with asymmetric pruritus or other atypical features. Treatment initially should focus on aggressive skin hydration, patient education on minimizing scratching, and optimization of the aspects of chronic kidney disease care that are most relevant to pruritus, including dialysis adequacy and serum parathyroid hormone, calcium, and phosphorus management. Data for therapy specifically for UP remain limited, although topical therapies, gabapentin, type B ultraviolet light phototherapy, acupuncture, and opioid-receptor modulators all may play a role.

Development and validation of the Patient Benefit Index for the dermatocosmetic treatment of aged skin

This study aimed to develop and validate an instrument for the assessment of patient-relevant benefit in dermatocosmetic treatment, i.e., skin care, of aged skin. Based on an open item collection with 33 elderly persons, items on patient-relevant treatment goals were collected. An expert panel selected 20 items to be most relevant and feasible for the questionnaire named Patient Benefit Index for Aged Skin (PBI-AS). The instrument, which assesses goal importance and achievement, was tested in a cognitive debriefing and validated in a longitudinal study (n = 80) along with the Dry Skin Area and Severity Index (DASI) and the Dermatology Quality of Life Index (DLQI) as convergent validation criteria. The cognitive debriefing showed the good practicability and feasibility of the instrument. Significant correlation with change in DASI (r = -0.527; p < 0.001) supports convergent validity of the PBI-AS. By contrast, correlation with DLQI was poor, indicating the different constructs. The PBI-AS is a valid and feasible tool for the patient-centered assessment of dermatocosmetic treatment benefit in aged skin.

Quality of Life in Patients with Atopic Dermatitis: Disease Burden, Measurement, and Treatment Benefit

Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is often markedly impaired in both adults and children with atopic dermatitis. The quality of life of the parents of infants or children with this chronic disease is also affected owing to problems such as itch-induced sleeping problems and treatment effort. As HRQoL is only partly associated with disease severity, both parameters should be evaluated in research and clinical practice. For the measurement of HRQoL, both skin- and disease-specific questionnaires are available in addition to generic instruments. In randomized controlled trials on atopic dermatitis, HRQoL is most commonly evaluated with the Dermatology Life Quality Index for use in adults and related questionnaires for children and families, such as the Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index. There is evidence that different treatment modalities may be effective in improving HRQoL in adults, children, and parents, which is supported by the patients' own evaluation of treatment benefit in an observational study.

Pruritus epidemiology and quality of life

The burden of chronic pruritus is increasingly recognized as significant worldwide. As wet-laboratory researchers investigate the pathophysiology of chronic pruritus, epidemiologists and health services researchers are quantifying the impact of pruritus by incidence, prevalence, and quality of life measures. Outcomes researchers are also investigating factors that may predict chronic pruritus incidence and severity. Such efforts will direct resources for research, public health intervention, and clinical care.

Assessment of pruritus in patients with psoriasis and atopic dermatitis: subjective and objective tools

Pruritus is a major symptom of skin disease. The quest to identify a valid and reliable method to assess this important symptom has led to the development of a myriad of measurement tools. Some clinical trials using subjective measurements of itch intensity have reported itch intensity levels in psoriasis that are close to severity levels found in atopic dermatitis. Although it is possible that we have previously underestimated the severity of pruritus in psoriasis, these unexpected findings prompted us to review and evaluate these subjective methodologies. We provide an overview of the current tools available to measure itch severity, including subjective rating scales and questionnaires and objective measures of scratch activity through videotape observation and wrist actigraphy. We discuss the advantages and limitations of these methods and encourage consideration of a novel objective method of evaluation.

Evaluation of patient-relevant outcomes of lymphedema and lipedema treatment: development and validation of a new benefit tool

OBJECTIVES

Patient-relevant treatment benefit is traditionally measured with health-related quality of life (HRQoL) instruments. The Patient Benefit Index (PBI) methodology allows for a more direct measurement, with the patients rating both importance and achievement of treatment goals. Here, we developed and validated a PBI version specific for the assessment of benefit in lymphedema and lipedema treatment (PBI-L).

METHODS

The development included five steps: (1) open item collection; (2) consensus of items in a multidisciplinary expert panel; (3) application of the German PBI-L in a cross-sectional study (n = 301); (4) translation into English; (5) application of the English PBI-L in a randomized clinical trial (n = 82). Subscales were developed using factor analysis. Construct validity was analyzed by correlating PBI-L and convergent criteria such as HRQoL and quality of care. To test for responsiveness, the association to change in HRQoL measures was computed.

RESULTS

Floor and ceiling effects were low. There were few missing values. Two well-interpretable subscales were found with Cronbach's alpha >0.8 each. Global and subscale scores correlated with convergent criteria and with change in disease-specific HRQoL, but not with change in generic HRQoL.

CONCLUSIONS

The PBI-L is an internally consistent, valid, and responsive instrument for the assessment of patient-relevant benefit of edema treatment.

[Assessment of pruritus - current standards and implications for clinical practice : consensus paper of the Action Group Pruritus Parameter of the International Working Group on Pruritus Research (AGP)]

With a prevalence of 20%, chronic pruritus is a symptom of many diseases with major impact on healthcare costs. The lack of specific therapeutic measures makes the development of new drugs and their testing in clinical trials urgent. It is not possible to measure pruritus in an objective way. For these reasons, it is necessary to have a series of standardized measures to characterize pruritus in a reliable way. Intensity scales such as the visual analog scale (VAS) are most frequently used to document the course of the symptoms. However, for assessing pruritus intensity, VAS is not an optimal instrument, although it cannot be dispensed with. The VAS should be combined with other scales in clinical studies in order to internally test the consistency of data. Other instruments for assessing intensity and course of pruritus are in the process of development. Presently scratch activity and scratch-associated lesions can be documented in a descriptive fashion. There are some studies that have employed devices to document scratch activity; however, methodological studies are not yet available. The patient-benefit index is an indispensable tool in clinical trials. A questionnaire for gathering data on the history and some pruritus-specific parameters has been developed and published. Questionnaires on patient quality of life, anxiety and depression are helpful in obtaining data on other cost-relevant parameters. A questionnaire on the quality of life, for instance, can provide important help in the assessment of the burden of the disease. The results of these questionnaires can be correlated with data on pruritus intensity scales. The relevant questionnaires have been partially digitalized so that they are available immediately as part of patient care. Additional methodological developments and studies are required in order to define a robust set of instruments for measuring pruritus in daily practice and in clinical studies.

Pruritus

Health-related quality of life (QoL) is a patient-reported outcome that describes the impact of the disease in question to all aspects of persons' life, including psychosocial, emotional, physical, and functional impact. As such, health-related QoL is particularly relevant in conditions that have no physical signs and need to rely on patient reports to know whether they are improving or not. Work is beginning in pruritus to develop instruments that can measure pruritus-related QoL. This article reviews the instruments that have been developed and used in pruritus and also reviews the literature regarding the impact of pruritus on QoL.

Benefit evaluation in the therapy of chronic wounds from the patients' perspective--development and validation of a new method

Assessing therapeutic benefit of any drug and medical device is essential in registration and cost reimbursement decisions in Germany and in many nations. In this study, a method for the assessment of patient-relevant benefits in wound therapy was developed and validated. A total of 83 items on treatment benefit from the patients' perspective were collected in an open survey, including n = 50 patients with chronic wounds. The item pool was compiled to a list of 22 items by an interdisciplinary panel of experts including patients. The item list is presented prior to therapy to assess patient-relevant treatment needs and during or after therapy to establish if benefits have been attained. A weighed patient benefit index (PBI) is calculated from the items of both questionnaires. The instrument was examined for practical feasibility, reliability, and validity in a prospective study involving n = 172 patients with acute or chronic wounds treated by vacuum-assisted therapy. Validation criteria were: change in generic and disease-specific quality of life; judgment of efficacy by patients and physicians; treatment satisfaction; patients' willingness to recommend the therapy to others. Construct validity was given for all criteria applied. Cronbach's alpha was 0.88. The instrument was well-accepted by patients and rated relevant for the assessment of benefit in wound treatment.

Itch: association with chronic venous disease, pain, and quality of life

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to examine the symptom of itch and its relationship with chronic venous disease, pain, and quality of life.

DESIGN

The study used an exploratory, cross-sectional design.

METHODS

One hundred and sixty-one participants completed demographic, health, substance abuse, itch, and pain questionnaires and the SF-12v2 Health Survey to measure health related quality of life.

RESULTS

Participants were mostly men (n=95, 59%), African American (113, 70.2%), and had a mean age of 44.19 years. A history of injection drug use was reported by 91.4%. Using the clinical score of the Clinical-Etiology-Anatomy-Pathophysiology (CEAP) Classification of the worst leg, the most common classification was Class 3, edema without skin changes (45.9%); 18.6% had severe venous disease (Classes 5 and 6). Eighty-eight participants (54.7%) reported itch somewhere on their body with 74 of them (45.9%) reporting itch on the legs or feet. Fourteen participants who reported itch of their legs or feet had wounds on the legs or feet. A positive correlation between magnitude of reported itch and CEAP clinical classification was noted (0.26, P =.025). This relationship was not strictly linear with itch increasing at a faster rate at higher levels of the CEAP classification. Persons with leg or feet itch had poorer health related quality of life, more comorbidities, and higher leg pain than those without itch. Because the SF-12v2 Health Survey is norm based, persons with itch were more than 1 standard deviation below the mean for the United States for their mental and physical health scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Itch on the legs or feet is a clinically relevant problem that is related to the level of venous disease. Persons with lower extremity itch have higher pain ratings and lower quality of life.

[Health services research in dermatology. Current status]

Assessment of benefits and quality of medical healthcare treatment is becoming more and more important. In order to accurately carry out this assessment and to assure a reliable planning of health care, valid data are needed. Health services research is an interdisciplinary field of research, which provides information on disease and health care and to uncover suboptimal and incorrect services. This information can be used to improve the quality of treatment and to increase efficiency. In order to obtain information on the health care for skin and allergic diseases the German Center for Health Services in Dermatology (CVderm) was founded in 2005. It is actively involved in the coordination and conducation of health care, collaborating with other university groups.