Refractory aggressive keratoacanthoma centrifugum marginatum of the scalp controlled with the epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor erlotinib

Keratoacanthoma centrifugum marginatum associated with mechanical trauma: Response to acitretin-A case report and review of the literature

Keratoacanthoma centrifugum marginatum (KCM) is a very rare variant of keratoacanthoma, characterized with progressive centrifugal growth, central healing, and atrophy. Due to its rarity and lack of distinctive histopathological features, KCM often raises diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. We present a case of a 76-year-old Caucasian woman with a single large tumor on her right shin that responded to oral retinoids. The patient presented history of local trauma. The tumor developed over the course of 20 months from a scar. To the best of our knowledge, this is the fifth case of KCM associated with mechanical trauma as a possible triggering factor.

Successful Treatment of Generalized Eruptive Keratoacanthoma of Grzybowski with Acitretin

Introduction

Keratoacanthomas (KA) are common cutaneous skin tumors originating from the hair follicles. Unlike squamous cell carcinoma, KA can regress spontaneously and have a benign evolution. Solitary KA is the most common form but familial multiple KA (Ferguson–Smith type), genetically predisposed KA (such as in xeroderma pigmentosum, or Muir–Torre syndrome), or sporadic multiple eruptive KA (Grzybowski type) have been described. Generalized eruptive KA of Grzybowski (GEKA) is a rare condition (around 40 reported cases). The pathophysiology is still unclear. Human papillomavirus (HPV) has been detected in sporadic KA but the presence of HPV39 has never been reported, to our knowledge, in GEKA.

Case Report

GEKA in an 80-year-old woman was successfully treated with acitretin (0.5 mg/kg/day) combined with surgical removal of the largest lesions. Treatment was well tolerated and led to decreased pruritus and tumor regression within 6 months. The presence of HPV39 was detected in a lesion by polymerase chain reaction and Sanger sequencing. No genetic alteration was found, in particular in the genes usually altered in squamous cell carcinoma (including NOTCH1, NOTCH2, CDKN2A, TP53).

Conclusion

We report a case of GEKA associated with the presence of HPV39 and the successful use of acitretin combined with surgical removal of the larger lesions.

Keratoacanthoma (KA): An update and review

Keratoacanthoma (KA) is a common but underreported tumor of the skin. Two striking features of KA are its clinical behavior with spontaneous regression after rapid growth and its nosological position on the border between benignity and malignancy. We review current knowledge on the clinical, histopathological, and dermoscopic features of KA to ensure a proper diagnosis and describe its variants, including different types of multiple KAs. We highlight current concepts of KA ethiopathogenesis with special emphasis on the genetic background of multiple familial KA, the role of Wnt signaling pathway, and induction of KA by BRAF inhibitors and procedures of esthetic dermatology. Finally, treatment strategies are presented with surgical excision as a first option, followed by other modalities, including intralesional chemotherapy, topical and systemic agents, lasers, cryotherapy, and photodynamic therapy.

Pattern of TGFbeta receptor 1 expression differs between kras-mutated keratoacanthomas and squamous cell carcinomas of the skin

PURPOSE

Increasing evidence indicates that TGFbeta- and EGFR-signaling is involved in the pathogenesis of keratoacanthoma (KA) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the skin. We analyzed the expression pattern of TGFbeta-signaling components and screened for mutations in tgfbetaR1, egfr, kras and braf in KAs and SCCs.

METHODS

Immunohistochemical analysis of TGFbeta1, TGFbetaR1, TGFbetaR2 and phospho-SMAD2/3 was performed on skin tumors (29 KAs, 30 well and 31 moderately differentiated SCCs). Mutation screening in hotspot regions of tgfbetaR1, egfr, kras and braf was performed through pyrosequencing of tumor DNA.

FINDINGS

Expression of TGFbeta1, TGFbetaR1 and p-SMAD2/3 was increased in tumors as compared to surrounding skin. In KAs characteristic strong discontinuous membranous TGFbetaR1 expression pattern frequently associated with kras mutation was noted. SCCs showed continuous TGFbetaR1 expression, stronger p-SMAD2/3 expression and less frequent kras mutations. In tumors at sun-exposed sites stronger TGFbetaR1 expression was noted. One SCC showed tgfbetaR1 mutation, but no other mutations were found.

CONCLUSION

Although tgfbetaR1 germline mutations cause inherited KAs and our finding of strong discontinuous membranous expression in KAs suggests accumulation of functionally altered protein, we found no tgfbetaR1 mutations or influence on TGFbeta-signaling, but frequent kras mutations in this subgroup of KAs. Characteristic TGFbetaR1 expression pattern in KA can facilitate histopathologic distinction from SCC.

Dermatologic toxicities to targeted cancer therapy: shared clinical and histologic adverse skin reactions

BACKGROUND

Dermatologic toxicities (DT) to targeted cancer therapy may present as inflammatory dermatoses, keratoses, and as benign and malignant squamous proliferations.

METHODS

Published reports of DT with cancer therapy with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), tyrosine kinase (TK), MEK, PI3K, AKT, and BRAF inhibitors were reviewed.

RESULTS

DT associated with targeted cancer therapy demonstrated similar reactions and may be grouped as (i) DT as cutaneous inflammation, and (ii) DT as cutaneous epithelial proliferation. EGFR inhibitor, cetuximab, and MEK inhibitors, selumetinib and trametinib, demonstrated papulopustular rash with a suppurative folliculitis in 83%, 93%, and 80% of the patients on therapy, respectively. Common DT with EGFR inhibitors erlotinib and tyrosine kinase inhibitor sorafenib were hand-foot skin reactions in 30-60% of patients on therapy. PI3K inhibitor BKM-120 and AKT inhibitor MK2206 produced maculopapular eruptions seen as dermal hypersensitivity reaction on the skin biopsy. RAF inhibitors vemurafenib and sorafenib were associated with a variety of cutaneous epithelial proliferations (keratosis pilaris, seborrheic keratosis, verruca vulgaris, actinic keratosis, keratoacanthoma, and squamous cell carcinoma.

CONCLUSION

Various anticancer agents may target similar cellular compounds and/or cell signaling pathways thus share similar clinical and histologic features of DT. The knowledge of the overlap of DT with different types of targeted cancer therapy will assist in evaluation of cutaneous reactions.