Botulinum neurotoxins: Future innovations

Botulinum neurotoxins (BoNTs) are multi-domain proteins whose potent and selective actions on nerve endings have led to innovations in both basic and clinical science. The various BoNT domains are responsible for binding to gangliosides and proteins associated with nerve cell membranes, internalization into the cell, and cleavage of one or more SNARE (soluble N-ethylmaleimide sensitive factor attachment protein receptor) proteins necessary for vesicle docking and fusion. Novel modifications to BoNT molecules, such as the creation of chimeras, helped identify the protein domains responsible for various aspects of BoNT action, such as localized effects. Other molecular modifications have been introduced in attempts to increase the specificity of BoNTs for autonomic or sensory neurons, with the ultimate goal of optimizing therapeutic selectivity. This research, in turn, has led to the development of BoNT-based proteins that can target non-SNARE substrates such as phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN). Still others are developing different BoNT serotypes, subtypes, or variants that are longer- or shorter-acting or have faster onset for various clinical purposes. New formulations of BoNTs that provide convenience for both patients and physicians are under investigation. Novel clinical uses are being evaluated for onabotulinumtoxinA, including in the prevention of post-operative atrial fibrillation. All these innovations capitalize on the unique properties of BoNTs, which continue to intrigue scientists and clinicians across numerous fields of study.

Lacrimal gland botulinum toxin injection for epiphora management

PURPOSE

Epiphora remains an often difficult to manage ocular complaint for ophthalmologists in all subspecialties. This review seeks to examine the safety and efficacy of botulinum toxin injection for management of chronic epiphora.

METHODS

The authors conducted a Pubmed search for studies on the use of lacrimal and transplanted salivary gland botulinum toxin injections for the management of epiphora within the past 20 years. Studies included had a minimum of four glandular injections.

RESULTS

The authors identified 14 studies and divided them by indication for injection; either functional epiphora, non-functional epiphora, or mixed studies. Seven studies examined injections for cases of functional epiphora, four for non-functional epiphora, and four for mixed cases. The number of glandular injections reported ranged from 4 to 65. Side effects reported were limited to diplopia, eyelid or lacrimal gland hematoma, papillary conjunctivitis, dry eye, ptosis, and bleeding.

CONCLUSIONS

Glandular botulinum toxin injection should be considered as a viable treatment strategy for both functional and nonfunctional epiphora. From the studies reviewed, botulinum toxin injection was shown to be effective in both children and adults. Injection can be performed in the outpatient setting, is minimally invasive, technically easy to administer, has a favorable side effect profile, and good efficacy. Furthermore, repeat injections can be performed with similar efficacy.

Botulinum Toxin Injections for Treatment of Drooling in Children with Cerebral Palsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: We aimed to review and analyse the effectiveness and safety of botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) injections for drooling in children with cerebral palsy. Data sources: We searched the EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library) databases from inception to January 2020. Methods: We included randomized controlled trials and observational studies which (1) involved children with cerebral palsy, (2) used BoNT-A for control of drooling, and (3) provided quantitative evaluations of drooling before and after intervention with BoNT-A. Results: Twenty-one trials met the inclusion criteria. Most studies showed that BoNT-A injections are safe and efficacious as a treatment for drooling in children with cerebral palsy. Four trials had sufficient data to pool the results for the meta-analysis. Both the drooling quotient (p = 0.002) and drooling Ffrequency and severity scale (p = 0.004) supported this conclusion. Conclusion: BoNT-A injections are a safe, reversible, effective treatment for drooling control in children with cerebral palsy that can offer effectiveness for more than 3 months with few side effects. The dosage of BoNT-A should not exceed 4 units/kg. Further studies are required to determine the optimal dosage and target glands.

Botulinum Toxin to Treat Horizontal Forehead Lines: A Refined Injection Pattern Accommodating the Lower Frontalis

BACKGROUND

When treating horizontal forehead lines with botulinum toxin type A the traditional approach requires that injection points should stay 1.5 to 2 cm above the orbital rim to avoid brow ptosis. Failure to treat the lower frontalis may potentially cause worse rhytides in the lower forehead.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to present a refined injection pattern accommodating the lower frontalis and evaluate its clinical efficacy and safety.

METHODS

Patients were categorized into 4 types according to the patterns of their forehead wrinkles. Moderate and severe wrinkles in the upper forehead were treated by the "safe zone" technique. Mild wrinkles and rhytides in the lower forehead were treated by the Microbotox technique. Standard photographs and measurements were taken before and after treatment. The effect on wrinkle reduction and changes in brow heights were assessed.

RESULTS

In total, 330 treatments were followed up in the clinic, and 246 treatments were followed up by telephone. Among the 330 treatments, 213 were evaluated in our clinic 2 to 4 weeks later, and the patients who received these treatments were recruited for effect evaluation and brow height measurements. The posttreatment severity of forehead wrinkles was significantly reduced (P < 0.05), and brow heights remained unchanged (P > 0.05). No severe adverse events were documented. Patient satisfaction was quite high.

CONCLUSIONS

The refined injection pattern is an effective and safe technique to treat horizontal forehead lines. The Microbotox technique enables treatment of the lower frontalis without changes in brow position.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3

Clinical duration of action of different botulinum toxin types in humans

The Botulinum NeuroToxin (BoNT) comprises several serotypes with distinct properties, mechanisms of action, sensitivity and duration of effect in different species. The serotype A (BoNT/A) is the prevalent neurotoxin applied in human's disease. In this paper we present an overview of the current knowledge regarding the duration of effect and the neuromuscular sprouting of different BoNT serotypes in humans. Then, we report the original results of a study in healthy subjects treated with BoNT/A, B, C and F using different neurophysiological techniques. Twelve healthy volunteers (7 men, 5 women) are treated with BoNT/A, B, C and F or placebo in Abductor digiti minimi (ADM) muscle of the hand. Before and after injections, an extensive neurophysiological study is performed with the CMAP amplitude variation, Multi-Motor Unit Action Potentials (MUAPs) analysis, the Turns/Amplitude ratio of interference pattern (IP) and determination of jitter and Fiber Density (FD) at single-fiber electromyography (SFEMG), at week 2 (w2), 4 (w4), 6 (w6) and 8 (w8). A maximal neuromuscular block is obtained at w2 for all the serotypes. Afterwards, the CMAP trend appear similar for BoNT/A, B, and C while, BoNT/F shows a faster recover. Multi-MUAPs analysis and IP detect mild changes at w2 for all serotypes, except for BoNT/F that shows a greater change since w4. SFEMG have minimal changes in FD while, Jitter increase at w2 with a slower decrease over the time for all BoNTs. In conclusion, BoNT/F has earlier sprouting and complete recovery at w8. Other serotypes present a slower and similar profile. The EMG appear useful to study the functional recovery in humans, and these results should provide new evidence for assessing different serotypes. These findings improve our knowledge regarding the methods to evaluate duration of effects and dose equivalents in different serotypes, that in the future could change the clinicians strategy for disease-tailored BoNT therapies.

The binding of botulinum neurotoxins to different peripheral neurons

Botulinum neurotoxins are the most potent toxins known. The double receptor binding modality represents one of the most significant properties of botulinum neurotoxins and largely accounts for their incredible potency and lethality. Despite the high affinity and the very specific binding, botulinum neurotoxins are versatile and multi-tasking toxins. Indeed they are able to act both at the somatic and at the autonomic nervous system. In spite of the preference for cholinergic nerve terminals botulinum neurotoxins have been shown to inhibit to some extent also the noradrenergic postganglionic sympathetic nerve terminals and the afferent nerve terminals of the sensory neurons inhibiting the release of neuropeptides and glutamate, which are responsible of nociception. Therefore, there is increasing evidence that the therapeutic effect in both motor and autonomic disorders is based on a complex mode of botulinum neurotoxin action modulating the activity of efferent as well as afferent nerve fibres.

BoNT/AB hybrid maintains similar duration of paresis as BoNT/A wild-type in murine running wheel assay

The highly potent Botulinum neurotoxins (BoNT) are successful drugs to treat neuromuscular disorders. Efforts are being made to further reduce the injected BoNT dose and to lengthen the interval between treatments. Detailed knowledge of the BoNT structure-activity relationship (SAR) allows combining the best features of the different BoNT serotypes. Of all seven BoNT serotypes A-G, BoNT/A displays the highest potency despite low neuronal binding affinity, while BoNT/B exhibits much higher affinity. Recently, a new BoNT/AB hybrid (AABB) was constructed comprising the catalytic and translocation domain of BoNT/A and the 50kDa cell binding domain of BoNT/B. Here, we compared BoNT/A wild-type (AAAA) and AABB with regard to ex vivo potency and in vivo potency, efficacy and duration of action using the mouse phrenic nerve hemidiaphragm assay and the murine running wheel assay, respectively. The ex vivo potency of AABB was found to be 8.4-fold higher than that of AAAA. For the latter, two and 5 pg each of AAAA and AABB, respectively, were bilaterally injected into the calf muscles and mouse running wheel performance was automatically monitored during the following weeks to determine potency, efficacy and duration. Mice displayed a dose-dependent impairment of running performance. AABB showed potency, efficacy and duration equal to AAAA demonstrating successful exchange of the cell binding domain. AABB might combine the higher potency and longer duration of BoNT/A with the target specificity for the autonomic nervous system of BoNT/B. AABB might therefore constitute an improved treatment option for acetylcholine-mediated autonomic disorders such as hypersalivation or hyperhidrosis.

Two Feet on the Membrane: Uptake of Clostridial Neurotoxins

The extraordinary potency of botulinum neurotoxins (BoNT) and tetanus neurotoxin (TeNT) is mediated by their high neurospecificity, targeting peripheral cholinergic motoneurons leading to flaccid and spastic paralysis, respectively, and successive respiratory failure. Complex polysialo gangliosides accumulate BoNT and TeNT on the plasma membrane. The ganglioside binding in BoNT/A, B, E, F, G, and TeNT occurs via a conserved ganglioside-binding pocket within the most carboxyl-terminal 25 kDa domain H_CC, whereas BoNT/C, DC, and D display here two different ganglioside binding sites. This enrichment step facilitates subsequent binding of BoNT/A, B, DC, D, E, F, and G to the intraluminal domains of the synaptic vesicle glycoprotein 2 (SV2) isoforms A-C and synaptotagmin-I/-II, respectively. Whereas an induced α-helical 20-mer Syt peptide binds via side chain interactions to the tip of the H_CC domain of BoNT/B, DC and G, the preexisting, quadrilateral β-sheet helix of SV2C-LD4 binds the clinically most relevant serotype BoNT/A mainly through backbone-backbone interactions at the interface of H_CC and H_CN. In addition, the conserved, complex N559-glycan branch of SV2C establishes extensive interactions with BoNT/A resulting in delayed dissociation providing BoNT/A more time for endocytosis into synaptic vesicles. An analogous interaction occurs between SV2A/B and BoNT/E. Altogether, the nature of BoNT-SV2 recognition clearly differs from BoNT-Syt. Subsequently, the synaptic vesicle is recycled and the bound neurotoxin is endocytosed. Acidification of the vesicle lumen triggers membrane insertion of the translocation domain, pore formation, and finally translocation of the enzymatically active light chain into the neuronal cytosol to halt release of neurotransmitters.

Clinical differences between botulinum neurotoxin type A and B

In humans, the therapeutic use of botulinum neurotoxin A (BoNT/A) is well recognized and continuously expanding. Four BoNTs are widely available for clinical practice: three are serotype A and one is serotype B: onabotulinumtoxinA (A/Ona), abobotulinumtoxinA (A/Abo) and incobotulinumtoxinA (A/Inco), rimabotulinumtoxinB (B/Rima). A/Abo, A/Inco, A/Ona and B/Rima are all licensed worldwide for cervical dystonia. In addition, the three BoNT/A products are approved for blepharospasm and focal dystonias, spasticity, hemifacial spasm, hyperhidrosis and facial lines, with remarkable regional differences. These toxin brands differ for specific activity, packaging, constituents, excipient, and storage. Comparative literature assessing the relative safety and efficacy of different BoNT products is limited, most data come from reports on small samples, and only a few studies meet criteria of evidence-based medicine. One study compared the effects of BoNT/A and BoNT/B on muscle activity of healthy volunteers, showing similar neurophysiological effects with a dose ratio of 1:100. In cervical dystonia, when comparing the effects of BoNT/A and BoNT/B, results are more variable, some studies reporting roughly similar peak effect and overall duration (at a ratio of 1:66, others reporting substantially shorter duration of BoNT/B than BoNT/A (at a ratio 1/24). Although the results of clinical studies are difficult to compare for methodological differences (dose ratio, study design, outcome measures), it is widely accepted that: BoNT/B is clinically effective using appropriate doses as BoNT/A (1:40-50), injections are generally more painful, in most of the studies on muscular conditions, efficacy is shorter, and immunogenicity higher. Since the earliest clinical trials, it has been reported that autonomic side effects are more frequent after BoNT/B injections, and this observation encouraged the use of BoNT/B for sialorrhea, hyperhidrosis and other non-motor symptoms. In these indications the efficacy of toxins A and B are comparable and dose ratio is 1:25-30.

Practical guidance for CD management involving treatment of botulinum toxin: a consensus statement

Cervical dystonia is a neurological movement disorder causing abnormal posture of the head. It may be accompanied by involuntary movements which are sometimes tremulous. The condition has marked effects on patients’ self-image, and adversely affects quality of life, social relationships and employment. Botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) is the treatment of choice for CD and its efficacy and safety have been extensively studied in clinical trials. However, current guidelines do not provide enough practical information for physicians who wish to use this valuable treatment in a real-life setting. In addition, patients and physicians may have different perceptions of what successful treatment outcomes should be. Consequently, an international group of expert neurologists, experienced in BoNT treatment, met to review the literature and pool their extensive clinical experience to give practical guidance about treatment of CD with BoNT. Eight topic headings were considered: the place of BoNT within CD treatment options; patient perspectives and desires for treatment; assessment and goal setting; starting treatment with BoNT-A; follow-up sessions; management of side effects; management of non-response; switching between different BoNT products. One rapporteur took responsibility for summarising the current literature for each topic, while the consensus statements were developed by the entire expert group. These statements are presented here along with a discussion of the background information.

Treatment of compensatory hyperhidrosis after sympathectomy with botulinum toxin and anticholinergics

PURPOSE

Compensatory hyperhidrosis (CH) is the most common adverse complication of sympathectomy. It often has a major negative impact on life quality. No efficient treatment of CH is available. We report nine cases of CH after sympathectomy, which were treated with botulinum toxin A/B (BTX) and anticholinergics.

METHODS

The patients responded to a dermatology life quality index (DLQI) questionnaire before injections with BTX and 3 weeks after treatment. At the follow-up visit, the participants also ranked the effect of the treatment on a five-grade scale. Three patients had residual sweating after BTX treatment, and received additional anticholinergics at the follow-up visit. Those subjects eventually had a third evaluation with the DLQI.

RESULTS

The DLQI score was, on average, 16.4 before treatment and decreased to 4.8 after BTX injections. Eight out of nine patients were satisfied with the treatment. The average DLQI score decreased to 2.2 when the patients with residual sweating (n = 3) received additional anticholinergics. Adverse events from BTX were mild and temporary, but dry mouth was substantial in one patient using anticholinergics.

CONCLUSIONS

A combination of BTX A/B and anticholinergics alleviated the hyperhidrosis with minor side-effects. We consider this treatment safe, effective, and well tolerated.

Diffusion, spread, and migration of botulinum toxin

Botulinum toxin (BoNT) is an acetylcholine release inhibitor and a neuromuscular blocking agent used for the treatment of a variety of neurologic and medical conditions. The efficacy and safety of BoNT depends on accurate selection and identification of intended targets but also may be determined by other factors, including physical spread of the molecule from the injection site, passive diffusion, and migration to distal sites via axonal or hematogenous transport. The passive kinetic dispersion of the toxin away from the injection site in a gradient-dependent manner may also play a role in toxin spread. In addition to unique properties of the various BoNT products, volume and dilution may also influence local and systemic distribution of BoNT. Most of the local and remote complications of BoNT injections are thought to be due to unwanted spread or diffusion of the toxin's biologic activity into adjacent and distal muscles. Despite widespread therapeutic and cosmetic use of BoNT over more than three decades, there is a remarkable paucity of published data on the mechanisms of distribution and its effects on clinical outcomes. The primary aim of this article is to critically review the available experimental and clinical literature and place it in the practical context.

Botulinum toxins for facial lines: a concise review

This is a concise review of the uses of botulinum toxins (BTXs) in dermatology and cosmetic procedures. It is a clinical rather than a basic science, pharmacological review. BTX had been initially used for selectively reducing and balancing periorbital muscle activity; thereby, reducing childhood strabismus and blepharospasm. This clinical research was initiated by Dr. Alan Scott over 40 years ago. BTX type A (BTX-A) was serendipitously observed to reduce forehead frown lines in patients being treated for blepharospasm. Extensive clinical research and development resulted in widespread aesthetic uses for BTX-A by reduction of selected hyperfunctional facial muscles. BTXs are also used for reduced localized hyperhidrosis. A topical BTX-A is being developed as a potential alternative to injected BTX.

Longer-acting and highly potent chimaeric inhibitors of excessive exocytosis created with domains from botulinum neurotoxin A and B

Various human neurogenic hyper-excitability disorders are successfully treated with type A or B BoNT (botulinum neurotoxin). The BoNT/A complex is widely used because of its longer-lasting benefits; also, autonomic side-effects are more often reported for BoNT/B. To establish if this distinct effect of BoNT/B could be exploited therapeutically, BoNT/A was modified so that it would bind the more abundant BoNT/B acceptor in rodents while retaining its desirable persistent action. The advantageous protease and translocation domain of BoNT/A were recombinantly combined with the acceptor-binding moiety of type B [H(C)/B (C-terminal half of BoNT/B heavy chain)], creating the chimaera AB. This purified protein bound the BoNT/B acceptor, displayed enhanced capability relative to type A for intraneuronally delivering its protease, cleaved SNAP-25 (synaptosome-associated protein of 25 kDa) and induced a more prolonged neuromuscular paralysis than BoNT/A in mice. The BA chimaera, generated by substituting H(C)/A (C-terminal half of BoNT/A heavy chain) into BoNT/B, exhibited an extremely high specific activity, delivered the BoNT/B protease via the BoNT/A acceptor into neurons, or fibroblast-like synoviocytes that lack SNAP-25, cleaving the requisite isoforms of VAMP (vesicle-associated membrane protein). Both chimaeras inhibited neurotransmission in murine bladder smooth muscle. BA has the unique ability to reduce exocytosis from non-neuronal cells expressing the BoNT/A-acceptor and utilising VAMP, but not SNAP-25, in exocytosis.

Effectiveness of type A botulinum toxins for aesthetic indications and their relative economic impact

BACKGROUND

It is accepted that the three commercially available type A botulinum toxins (BoNT-As) are different, their units of potency are not interchangeable and no fixed dose conversion ratio exists between them. To date, there is no clear evidence demonstrating the superiority of one toxin over another clinically.

OBJECTIVE

The study aims to identify evidence confirming the equivocal efficacy of the formulations and to justify that attention can therefore be reasonably turned to their differing costs as a means of aiding choice of treatment. This is achieved via the development of the cost calculator presented herein, to enable direct economic comparisons to be made between the three commercially available BoNT-A formulations licensed for aesthetic indications in the UK.

METHODS

An online literature search using PubMed was undertaken and the latest available information on the cost for each BoNT-A treatment was accessed via the British National Formulary (BNF). Predicated on the evidence review, a cost calculator was developed which takes into account for the glabella: the number of treatments needed per patient with each product over a year and the number of treatments available with differing dilutions of each vial of each product over a year. A range of cost prices can also be introduced allowing a direct cost-comparison to be made for treating the glabella of a set number of patients over a year between different products.

RESULTS

Azzalure(®) (abobotulinumtoxinA) was the most cost-effective in almost all scenarios tested, whilst Vistabel(®) (onabotulinumtoxinA) was the least cost-effective. Of the two products with published non-inferiority with respect to each other, onabotulinumtoxinA and Bocouture(®) (incobotulinumtoxinA), incobotulinumtoxinA offered a lower overall cost to treat the glabella of the same number of patients when compared with Vistabel.

CONCLUSION

In most scenarios, BoNT-A treatment with abobotulinumtoxinA will result in significant annual cost savings when compared with treatment with onabotulinumtoxinA or incobotulinumtoxinA.