Perioperative Management for Port Catheter Procedures in Pediatric Patients with Severe Hemophilia and Inhibitors

BACKGROUND

 The objective of this systematic study was to assess the perioperative management and outcome of surgery in pediatric patients with hemophilia A/B and inhibitors compared to nonhemophilic pediatric patients.

METHODS

 The surgical outcome of 69 port catheter operations in patients with hemophilia who developed inhibitory antibodies against the administered factor was compared to 51 procedures in the control group. In the patients with hemophilia and inhibitors, a standardized protocol for recombinant activated factor VII was used to prevent perioperative bleeding.

RESULTS

 Hemophilic pediatric patients with inhibitors showed no significant differences in perioperative management (blood transfusion: p = 0.067, duration of surgery: p = 0.69; p = 0.824) in comparison to patients without hemophilia. The length of hospital stay was significantly longer in pediatric patients with hemophilia and inhibitors (20 days vs. 4 days for insertion; 12 days vs. 1 day for explantation). Moreover, no statistically significant difference was found for secondary bleeding (three patients with hemophilia vs. none in the control group; p = 0.11) or surgical complications (five hemophilia patients vs. none with grade I complication; one hemophilia patient vs. none with grade II complications; p = 0.067).

CONCLUSION

 This study has demonstrated that port catheter insertion and removal is safe in these patients. Moreover, it shows the importance of a coordinated approach with a multidisciplinary team.

Simoctocog alfa (Nuwiq®) in children: early steps in life's journey for people with severe hemophilia A

People with severe hemophilia A usually experience their first bleed early in life. In children with severe hemophilia A, primary prophylaxis is recommended to prevent recurrent and potentially life-threatening bleeds that significantly impact day-to-day life. Factor VIII (FVIII) prophylaxis is well-established in children and has been shown to reduce the development of hemophilic arthropathy. However, a major challenge of FVIII therapy is the development of neutralizing anti-FVIII antibodies (FVIII inhibitors). Simoctocog alfa (Nuwiq®) is a human cell line-derived recombinant FVIII (rFVIII) whose immunogenicity, efficacy, and safety have been studied in 167 children with severe hemophilia A across two prospective clinical trials and their long-term extensions. In 105 previously untreated children, the inhibitor rate of 16.2% for high-titer inhibitors (26.7% for all inhibitors) was lower than published rates for hamster cell line-derived rFVIII products. There was no inhibitor development in previously untreated children with non-null F8 mutations and in previously treated children. In a case series of 10 inhibitor patients, 8 (80%) underwent successful immune tolerance induction with simoctocog alfa with a median time to undetectable inhibitor of 3.5 months. In an analysis of 96 children who enrolled in the extension studies and received long-term simoctocog alfa prophylaxis for up to 5 years, median spontaneous, joint, and total annualized bleeding rates were 0.3, 0.4, and 1.8, respectively. No thromboembolisms were reported in any of the 167 children, and there were no treatment-related deaths. Optimal care of children should consider several factors, including minimization of inhibitor development risk, maintaining tolerance to FVIII, highly effective bleed prevention and treatment, safety, and impact on long-term outcomes such as bone and joint health. In this context we review the pediatric clinical data and ongoing studies with simoctocog alfa.

Central venous access devices implantation in children with severe hemophilia a: data from the children comprehensive care center of China

Objectives

To report the perioperative management experience of central venous access devices (CVAD) in Chinese children with severe hemophilia A (SHA) in China.

Methods

This retrospective study included SHA children who underwent Port-A-Cath or peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) implantation between 2020/01 and 2021/07. Collected data included baseline characteristics, factor replacement regimen and CVAD-related complications.

Results

Nine patients had nine ports placed, and eight patients underwent 10 PICCs placement. Patients without or with low-titer inhibitor (<5 BU) received a port. The median preoperative and postoperative plasma-derived factor VIII (pd-FVIII) doses were 53.0 (44.4-61.1) and 315.9 (88.2-577.8) IU/kg. The median port duration was 189 (15-512) days, with infection incidence of 0.06 per 1000 CVAD days. Patients with high-titer inhibitors (>10 BU) received PICC. The median recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) dose was 87.47 μg/kg before and for 5-7 doses after implantation over 2-3 days. The median PICC duration was 226.5 days, with infection incidence of 0.12 per 1000 catheter-days.

Conclusions

CVADs can be safely implanted in China. PICC implantation is a practical and safe option for SHA children with high-titer inhibitors.

Case Report: A Child With Hemophilia A Serves as Donor for Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation to Cure His Brother's Severe Aplastic Anemia

The first-line treatment of severe aplastic anemia is allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with a matched sibling donor. However, co-morbidities of the identical donor can make donation difficult. We present a transplantation where in parallel with the patient's conditioning treatment, the preparation of the donor with severe hemophilia A required a special management with perioperative factor VIII substitution. Donation was successful without complications, and 18 months after transplantation, the patient and his donor are well without any long-term sequelae. To our knowledge, this is the first reported succesfull transplantation with hemophilic child serving as a bone marrow donor. The procedure did not mean a significant risk to donor health, so donors with hemophilia should not be excluded from donation.

An anesthetic management of head and neck cancer reconstructive surgery in a patient having hemophilia A: a case report

Hemophilia A is a hemorrhagic disease caused by coagulation factor VIII deficiency. In head and neck cancer surgery, especially during a reconstructive one, complications can occur. These include hematomas due to bleeding which can then lead to flap ischemia, necrosis, and impaired wound healing. There are fewer cases of reconstructive surgery in patients with hemophilia A. Here in we report, a reconstructive surgery that involved mass resection, partial glossectomy (right), selective neck dissection (right, Levels I, II, III, IV), and reconstruction at the lateral arm free flap (left) in a 25-year-old man with hemophilia A. The surgery was successfully performed without any complications after pretreatment with Factor VIII concentrate, which has not been reported earlier.

Correction of haemostasis can be reduced to four days for CVAD implantation in severe haemophilia A patients: Data from the PedNet study group

INTRODUCTION

Central venous access devices (CVAD) are used to facilitate intravenous treatment with coagulation factor concentrates (CFCs) in haemophilia A (HA). Guidelines for perioperative CFC replacement therapy are based on single centre experiences, and the length of replacement therapy varies.

AIM

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether haemostasis coverage under four days is as effective and safe as a longer period of haemostatic coverage.

METHODS

We identified patients with severe HA without inhibitors or major bleeds within one month of the surgery who received their first CVAD. We compared the CFC consumption and bleeds between children with ≤4 and those who received 5-7 perioperative treatment days including the day of surgery. Bleeds were recorded up to 4 days after the end of perioperative haemostatic coverage.

RESULTS

In total, 144 children met the eligibility criteria and were included in the study cohort: 34 had received haemostatic coverage for ≤4 days, while 110 had received 5-7 days of haemostatic coverage. One bleed related to the surgery occurred in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Overall, the bleeding complications were rare. Haemostatic coverage with CFCs under ≤4 days with elective CVAD insertions was as effective as coverage for ≥5 days.

A multicenter, open-label phase 3 study of emicizumab prophylaxis in children with hemophilia A with inhibitors

Emicizumab, a bispecific humanized monoclonal antibody, bridges activated factor IX (FIX) and FX to restore the function of missing activated FVIII in hemophilia A. Emicizumab prophylaxis in children with hemophilia A and FVIII inhibitors was investigated in a phase 3 trial (HAVEN 2). Participants, previously receiving episodic/prophylactic bypassing agents (BPAs), were treated with subcutaneous emicizumab: 1.5 mg/kg weekly (group A), 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks (group B), or 6 mg/kg every 4 weeks (group C). Pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy (including an intraindividual comparison of participants from a noninterventional study) were evaluated. Eighty-five participants aged <12 years were enrolled. In group A (n = 65), the annualized rate of treated bleeding events (ABRs) was 0.3 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.17-0.50), and 77% had no treated bleeding events. Intraindividual comparison of 15 participants who previously took BPA prophylaxis showed that emicizumab prophylaxis reduced the ABR by 99% (95% CI, 97.4-99.4). In groups B (n = 10) and C (n = 10), ABRs were 0.2 (95% CI, 0.03-1.72) and 2.2 (95% CI, 0.69-6.81), respectively. The most frequent adverse events were nasopharyngitis and injection-site reactions; no thrombotic events occurred. Two of 88 participants developed antidrug antibodies (ADAs) with neutralizing potential, that is, associated with decreased emicizumab plasma concentrations: 1 experienced loss of efficacy, and, in the other, ADAs disappeared over time without intervention or breakthrough bleeding. All other participants achieved effective emicizumab plasma concentrations, regardless of the treatment regimen. Emicizumab prophylaxis has been shown to be a highly effective novel medication for children with hemophilia A and inhibitors. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02795767.

Hemophilia: What the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon Needs to Know

Hemophilia will be encountered in the oral and maxillofacial surgeon's office. A thorough understanding of hemophilia is necessary to safely care for these patients. One must understand the severity of the patient's hemophilia as well as whether or not inhibitors are present. The patient's surgical management will be influenced by these two factors. In addition to the possible need to transfuse factors or desmopressin, special care must be taken perioperatively to avoid bleeding complications. This article reviews the overall management of hemophilia A and B as well as the specific perioperative management of these patients.

Dental Management of a Child with Incidentally Detected Hemophilia: Report of a Clinical Case

Children with hemophilia (A or B) are at risk for bleeding episodes, which rank from mild mucosal/soft tissues bleeding to life-threatening hemorrhages. This report describes the dental/medical management provided to an 8.10-year-old patient suffering from uncontrolled bleeding after a surgical procedure to expose both permanent upper central incisors, in which hemophilia was a pure incidental finding. Additionally, diverse precautions to be considered during the dental clinical treatment of hemophilic children are discussed.

Perioperative treatment of hemophilia A patients: blood group O patients are at risk of bleeding complications

ESSENTIALS: Targeting of factor VIII values is a challenge during perioperative replacement therapy in hemophilia. This study aims to identify the extent and predictors of factor VIII underdosing and overdosing. Blood group O predicts underdosing and is associated with perioperative bleeding. To increase quality of care and cost-effectiveness of treatment, refining of dosing is obligatory.

SUMMARY

BACKGROUND

Perioperative administration of factor VIII (FVIII) concentrate in hemophilia A may result in both underdosing and overdosing, leading to respectively a risk of bleeding complications and unnecessary costs.

OBJECTIVES

This retrospective observational study aims to identify the extent and predictors of underdosing and overdosing in perioperative hemophilia A patients (FVIII levels < 0.05 IU mL(-1)).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred nineteen patients undergoing 198 elective, minor, or major surgical procedures were included (median age 40 years, median body weight 75 kg). Perioperative management was evaluated by quantification of perioperative infusion of FVIII concentrate and achieved FVIII levels. Predictors of underdosing and (excessive) overdosing were analyzed by logistic regression analysis. Excessive overdosing was defined as upper target level plus ≥ 0.20 IU mL(-1).

RESULTS

Depending on postoperative day, 7-45% of achieved FVIII levels were under and 33-75% were above predefined target ranges as stated by national guidelines. A potential reduction of FVIII consumption of 44% would have been attained if FVIII levels had been maintained within target ranges. Blood group O and major surgery were predictive of underdosing (odds ratio [OR] 6.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.7-14.9; OR 3.3, 95% CI 1.4-7.9). Blood group O patients had more bleeding complications in comparison to patients with blood group non-O (OR 2.02, 95% CI 1.00-4.09). Patients with blood group non-O were at higher risk of overdosing (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.1-1.9). Additionally, patients treated with bolus infusions were at higher risk of excessive overdosing (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.3-2.4).

CONCLUSION

Quality of care and cost-effectiveness can be improved by refining of dosing strategies based on individual patient characteristics such as blood group and mode of infusion.

Living donor liver transplantation from an asymptomatic donor with mild coagulation factor IX deficiency: report of a case

The use of donors with coagulation FIX deficiency is controversial, and there are no current protocols for peri-transplant management. We herein describe the first reported case of a pediatric LDLT from an asymptomatic donor with mild coagulation FIX deficiency. A 32-yr-old female was evaluated as a donor for her 12-month-old daughter with biliary atresia. The donor's pretransplant coagulation tests revealed asymptomatic mild coagulation FIX deficiency (FIX activity 60.8%). Freeze-dried human blood coagulation FIX concentrate was administered before the dissection of the liver and 12 h afterwards by bolus infusion (40 U/kg) and was continued on POD 1. The bleeding volume at LDLT was 590 mL. On POD 1, 3, 5, and 13, the coagulation FIX activity of the donor was 121.3%, 130.6%, 114.6%, and 50.2%, respectively. The donor's post-transplant course was uneventful, and the recipient is currently doing well at 18 months after LDLT. The FIX activity of the donor and recipient at nine months after LDLT was 39.2% and 58.0%, respectively. LDLT from donors with mild coagulation FIX deficiency could be performed effectively and safely using peri-transplant short-term coagulation FIX replacement and long-term monitoring of the plasma FIX level in the donor.

Management of surgical patients with bleeding disorders

Invasive procedures for patients with bleeding disorders require planning on the part of the health care team. The patient population affected involves those with hereditary bleeding disorders, such as von Willebrand disease or hemophilia; in addition, patients who use antithrombotic drugs must be considered and their care managed. The choice of treatment depends on a number of factors, including the procedure planned, the type and severity of the disorder, and the age and morbidity of the patient. The indications, dosing, and timing of presurgical and surgical interventions will be reviewed, as well as special considerations for vascular access devices.

Surgical interventions in childhood rare factor deficiencies: a single-center experience from Turkey

Congenital rare factor deficiencies may present in infancy by life-threatening bleedings or may not show any symptoms until adulthood. It is reported more commonly in countries having consanguineous marriages. Data regarding surgical interventions of rare congenital factor deficiencies are based on case reports and records of guidelines. There are no well documented and separately prepared directories related to pre-surgical and prophylactic approaches of surgical interventions of these deficiencies. Our retrospective study consisted of 171 rare factor deficiencies that were followed up in our clinic, and of whom 61 had 88 surgical interventions between 1990 and 2012. Of these patients, 45 were having factor VII deficiency, and factor V, X, XI, XIII and fibrinogen deficiencies were present in five, four, three, two and two patients, respectively. In 23 patients, factor coagulant activities were under 5% (37.7%), in 15 it was between 5 and 30% (24.6%), and in 23 between 30 and 50% (37.7%). Twenty-eight were symptomatic and 33 were asymptomatic. Information of 51 (83.6%) male and 10 (16.4%) female patients with an age range of 5-25 years (13 ± 5.27), whose age at presentation ranged between 3 weeks and 18 years (7 ± 4.66), were retrieved from patient records and from the records contained in the data-processing environment introduced in 2005. The rate of familial consanguinity was 49.2%. Of the surgical interventions, 24 (27.3%) were major, 24 (27.3%) were minor and 40 (45.4%) were circumcision. We used fresh frozen plasma in 32, recombinant factor (rF)VIIa in 20, prothrombin complex concentrate in five and fibrinogen in three patients during surgical interventions. In 18 patients, antifibrinolytic agents were also used. In 27 patients, surgical interventions were applied without any replacement therapy. No additional doses were required after surgical prophylaxis doses. Thrombotic events were not observed. Antibody occurrence was not detected in these patients. In our study, we evaluated preparation for surgical procedures, factor replacement therapy before surgical intervention and postoperative follow-up in patients with rare coagulation factor deficiency.