Protective effects of ketotifen on allergen-induced bronchoconstriction and skin weal

Effect of cetirizine, ketotifen and chlorpheniramine on the dynamics of the cutaneous hypersensitivity reaction: a comparative study

Allergic cutaneous challenge causes mast cell and basophil mediator release which recruit inflammatory cells to the site of antigen administration. This secondary cell infiltration and mediator release is responsible for the changes seen during the late phase of allergic diseases. In this randomised, double-blind, cross-over, placebo controlled study, it was demonstrated that, at steady-state drug concentrations, chlorpheniramine reduced the wheal-and-flare reaction by about 50% compared to the 75% reduction, on average, by cetirizine and ketotifen. Cetirizine significantly reduced eosinophil vacuolisation at all observation periods, i.e. 2,6,10 and 24 h, and also inhibited basophil accumulation significantly at 10 h (75% reduction), while chlorpheniramine had a negligible effect on these variables. These changes would indicate that the late phase reaction was modified, especially as eosinophil vacuolisation is known to correlate with late phase intensity, T-lymphocyte infiltration and subsequent tissue damage. It further supports previous speculation that cetirizine inhibit late histamine release by acting on basophils. The extent of induration in the late phase reaction did not differ significantly among the three treatments. Cetirizine and ketotifen, noticeably although not significantly, reduced eosinophil and lymphocyte recruitment. As these two antihistamines differ structurally and in regard to receptor specificity, it is possible that they exert their actions on other, unspecified, receptors.

Do diagnostic procedures other than inhalation challenge predict immediate bronchial responses to inhaled allergen?

To investigate the relationships between allergen inhalation challenge and other diagnostic procedures, inhalation challenge with house dust (HD) allergen, intradermal skin tests with HD allergen, inhalation challenge with methacholine and circulating HD allergen-specific IgE levels were examined in 104 patients with bronchial asthma. Using the single exposure method, allergen inhalation challenge was performed. Forty-three patients had positive bronchial responses to allergen and 61 patients had negative bronchial responses. With serially diluted HD allergen (10(-3) to 10(-6), w/v), skin-test sensitivity was expressed as the highest dilution required to produce a weal of more than 9 x 9 mm. With the continuous exposure method, bronchial responsiveness to methacholine was evaluated as the number of units of inhaled methacholine (PD35-Grs) from the start to the point at which Grs had decreased by 35% from its baseline value. The level of circulating HD allergen-specific IgE was measured with the Phadebas RAST system and the results were assessed as a RAST score. Using discriminant analysis, in which the independent variables were skin-test sensitivity, PD35-Grs and the RAST score, only in 30% of all patients was bronchial responsiveness to inhaled HD allergen predictable. Therefore, we suggest that inhalation challenge with allergen is an essential test for determining the role of a specific allergen in airways at present.

Ketotifen. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use in asthma and allergic disorders

Ketotifen is an orally active prophylactic agent for the management of bronchial asthma and allergic disorders. Accumulated evidence indicates that after 6 to 12 weeks of administration, ketotifen significantly reduces respiratory symptoms and the need for concomitant antiasthmatic drugs in about 70% and 50%, respectively, of patients with mild to moderate bronchial asthma. However, absolute improvement in lung function is generally slight. Ketotifen also has pronounced antihistaminic and antianaphylactic properties which result in moderate to marked symptom improvement in the majority of patients with atopic dermatitis, seasonal or perennial rhinitis, allergic conjunctivitis, chronic or acute urticaria or food allergy. Comparative trials with established agents--notably sodium cromoglycate (cromolyn sodium) in asthma and histamine H1-antagonists in allergic disorders--indicate that ketotifen has comparable clinical utility. Unlike inhaled sodium cromoglycate, ketotifen ameliorates the symptoms of asthma, rhinitis and dermatitis when present together in atopic patients. Patient acceptance of ketotifen is good, although sedation can be troublesome in older children and adults for the initial 2 weeks of treatment. Weight gain is another notable effect in a small percentage of patients. Thus, ketotifen appears to be a useful agent for the management of allergic disorders and bronchial asthma, particularly in patients for whom oral therapy is preferred. Although a lengthy run-in period is needed in the treatment of asthma, in those patients who respond, continued reduction in the frequency and severity of symptoms and in the use of additional antiasthmatic drugs can be anticipated.

Effect of ketotifen on childhood asthma: a double-blind study

Ketotifen was administered orally, for 3 months, to 40 children aged 3-14 years with chronic extrinsic asthma of moderate severity in a double-blind placebo-controlled study. A significant clinical improvement with concomitant reduction of antiasthmatic drugs was found in the group receiving the active drug compared with the placebo group (p less than 0.05). The continued administration of ketotifen in an open study to a group of 21 children comprised of patients belonging to both groups (active-placebo) for a period of 15-18 months resulted in disappearance of symptoms in 10 children (47.6%) and moderate improvement in 7 (33.3%).