Serial immunological investigations in a patient who had a life-threatening reaction to intravenous protamine

What's fishy about protamine? Clinical use, adverse reactions, and potential alternatives

Protamine, a highly basic protein isolated from salmon sperm, is the only clinically available agent to reverse the anticoagulation of unfractionated heparin. Following intravenous administration, protamine binds to heparin in a nonspecific electrostatic interaction to reverse its anticoagulant effects. In clinical use, protamine is routinely administered to reverse high-dose heparin anticoagulation in cardiovascular procedures, including cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. Despite the lack of supportive evidence regarding protamine's effectiveness to reverse low-molecular-weight heparin, it is recommended in guidelines with low-quality evidence. Different dosing strategies have been reported for reversing heparin in cardiac surgical patients based on empiric dosing, pharmacokinetics, or point-of-care measurements of heparin levels. Protamine administration is associated with a spectrum of adverse reactions that range from vasodilation to life-threatening cardiopulmonary dysfunction and shock. The life-threatening responses appear to be hypersensitivity reactions due to immunoglobulin E and/or immunoglobulin G antibodies. However, protamine and heparin-protamine complexes can activate complement inflammatory pathways and inhibit other coagulation factors. Although alternative agents for reversing heparin are not currently available for clinical use, additional research continues evaluating novel therapeutic approaches.

Management of multiple drug allergies in children

Children with multiple drug allergies are likely to require treatment with one or more of the drugs to which they may have had a reaction, when there is no alternate effective drug available. Detailed review of their history and/or use of appropriate diagnostic studies will help determine the potential safety of readministering the desired drug as well as the method for its readministration, most likely in the form of a drug challenge or desensitization. A practical approach to the diagnosis and treatment of children with multiple drug allergies is described in this review.

Hypersensibilité aux insulines

GREAT PROGRESS: The use of purified insulins obtained by genetics has dramatically lowered the frequency of insulin hypersensitivity. This frequency has decreased from 1 to 55% with non purified insulins and to 0.1 to 2% with newly generated insulins.

DIAGNOSTIC MEASURES

The anamnesis should clarify the allergic background of the patient, previous treatments with insulin, their duration of use and any eventual reactions. Examination of the lesions must assess the type (papule, eczema, purpura), the localization and extent. The second step skin tests, when negative, eliminate the responsibility of the insulin tested. They also participate in the search for cross-reactions between the various insulines. Their positivity is not always synonymous of hypersensitivity. STRATEGY TO BE APPLIED: In the case of localised cutaneous reactions, spontaneous regression is generally observed, the association of an oral antihistamine and/or the fractioning of the dose and its injection on several different sites often leads to the disappearance of these reactions. If the reactions persist, topical or oral corticosteroids of short duration can be useful. Finally, the switch to another insulin or even a tolerance induction with the least skin test reactive insulin as a last resource. The most severe systemic reactions are an indication for tolerance induction.

Diagnostic evaluation of a large group of patients with immediate allergy to penicillins: the role of skin testing

BACKGROUND

Penicillin is no longer the most commonly prescribed beta-lactam, and the pattern of reactions has changed. We studied the diagnostic value of skin testing in penicillin-allergic subjects from a population where benzylpenicillin is not now the most frequently used beta-lactam.

METHODS

Patients with a history of immediate allergic reactions to penicillins were studied with: skin tests with major and minor determinants of benzylpenicillin (BPO/MDM), amoxicillin, and ampicillin; in vitro determination of specific IgE; and controlled administration for those with a positive history but negative skin and in vitro tests. A reaction was considered immediate when symptoms appeared within a maximum of 1 h after drug intake.

RESULTS

After testing, 290 patients (71% having anaphylaxis and 29% having urticaria) proved to be allergic. Amoxicillin was involved in 64.8% and benzylpenicillin in 2.8% of the patients. Skin test positivity to at least one determinant appeared in 70% of cases, amoxicillin being the most frequent. The overall sensitivity decreased markedly when only BPO and MDM were considered. In 13.1% of patients, the diagnosis was established by in vitro test and in 16.9% by controlled administration. Of the 290 patients, 42.1% were positive to determinants generated from benzylpenicillin and 57.9% were selective responders.

CONCLUSIONS

Sensitivity of skin tests to BPO was lower than reported, being partly replaced by minor determinants, mostly amoxicillin. The incorporation of additional reagents and the development of new tests are required, and these will probably change as the patterns of consumption vary.

Precipitation of insulinotropin in the presence of protamine: effect of phenol and zinc on the isophane ratio and the insulinotropin concentration in the supernatant

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to determine the minimum quantity of protamine required for the completion of insulinotropin precipitation under different precipitation conditions.

METHODS

The experiments involved combining insulinotropin with varying concentrations of protamine in pH 7.2 phosphate buffered saline and analyzing the concentrations of both proteins in the supernatant. Isophane ratio (the protamine/insulinotropin molar ratio that results in a minimum total protein concentration in the supernatant) was determined for different precipitation conditions.

RESULTS

When neutral solutions of insulinotropin (pI 5.3) and protamine (pI 13.8) were combined, precipitation did not occur. However, in the presence of phenol and/or zinc, insulinotropin co-precipitated with protamine. In the presence of phenol, the isophane ratio and the insulinotropin concentration in the supernatant were determined to be 0.08 and 0.18 mg/ml, respectively. In the presence of zinc, the isophane ratio increased with zinc concentration, apparently from the precipitation of protamine in the presence of zinc. The isophane ratio and the insulinotropin concentration in the supernatant were 0.13 and 0.13 mg/ml, respectively, when the zinc/insulinotropin molar ratio was one. In the presence of phenol and zinc with the zinc/insulinotropin molar ratio of 1.0, the isophane ratio and the insulinotropin concentration in the supernatant were 0.11 and 1 microgram/ml, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

A method to determine the isophane ratio of protamine/insulinotropin precipitation was developed to determine the minimum quantity of protamine required for the completion of insulinotropin precipitation under different precipitation conditions. A synergistic effect between phenol and zinc on the precipitation of insulinotropin in the presence of protamine was found.

Drug allergy

Although allergic drug reactions are just one type of adverse reaction to medications, they are clinically very important because of the morbidity and mortality they cause. An ever-expanding pharmacopeia increases the potential for allergic drug reactions. An understanding of the types of allergic drug reactions, their immunopathologic mechanisms, and the most likely medications involved; an approach to determine the drug responsible for the reaction; and ways to prevent future allergic drug reactions are important features in minimizing patient morbidity.

Allergy to protamine

Recent advances in medicine, such as cardiac catheterization, phoresis, dialysis, and cardiopulmonary bypass technology, have increased the need for heparin anticoagulation. To antagonize heparin's effect and prevent hemorrhagic complications after the procedure, protamine has likewise been used more frequently. With its increased use have come increased reports of adverse protamine reactions consisting of rash, urticaria, elevation of pulmonary artery pressure, systemic hypotension, and, at times, death. The elevation of pulmonary artery pressure, which appears to be a rather common occurrence in animals, may be an isolated finding without clinical consequences in humans. However, this pulmonary vasoconstriction may, when severe, lead to acute right-sided heart failure and systemic hypotension. Other protamine reactions involve a decrease in systemic vascular resistance and systemic hypotension without changes in pulmonary artery pressure. Causes of acute protamine reactions may involve the generation of anaphyatoxins and prostanoids either from protamine-heparin complexes or complement-fixing antiprotamine IgG antibodies, from inhibition of plasma Carboxypeptidase N, from crosslinking of cell-surface antiprotamine IgE on mast cells and basophils with subsequent mediator release, or from potentiation of IgE-mediated release of histamine through a polycationin-recognition site. Although we have come a long way in understanding the mechanisms by which protamine can cause its ill effects in humans, more work is clearly needed to define, in prospective studies, the incidence of and risk factors for protamine reactions in various patient groups, and to delineate more clearly which mechanisms are involved in each clinical type of acute protamine reaction. Hopefully, this will lead to strategies and protamine alternatives that will prevent or diminish, in frequency or severity, adverse protamine reactions. Alternatively, a clearer picture of the risk factors important for protamine reactions and the predictive value of diagnostic tests (e.g., protamine IgE antibody) can also minimize the clinical impact of this increasingly common adverse event.