Effect of azelastine and ketotifen on the bronchial and skin responses to platelet-activating factor in humans

Re-evaluation of the canonical PAF pathway in cutaneous anaphylaxis

Platelet-activating factor (PAF) is a potent classical lipid mediator that plays a critical role in various diseases such as allergy and nervous system disorders. In the realm of allergy, previous studies suggested that PAF is generated in response to extracellular stimuli and contributes to allergic reactions via PAF receptor (PAFR). However, the sources of endogenous PAF and its pathophysiological dynamics remain largely elusive in vivo. Here, we report that rapid and local PAF generation completely depends on lysophospholipid acyltransferase 9 (LPLAT9, also known as LPCAT2) expressed in mast cells in IgE-mediated passive cutaneous anaphylaxis. However, we found that LPLAT9 knockout (KO) mice did not display attenuated vascular leakage. Additionally, decreased vascular leakage was observed in PAFR KO mice, but not in endothelial cell-specific mice in this model. These divergent highlights a yet unsolved complexity of the biological functions of PAF and PAFR in a pathophysiological process.

Anaphylaxis-a 2020 practice parameter update, systematic review, and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) analysis

Anaphylaxis is an acute, potential life-threatening systemic allergic reaction that may have a wide range of clinical manifestations. Severe anaphylaxis and/or the need for repeated doses of epinephrine to treat anaphylaxis are risk factors for biphasic anaphylaxis. Antihistamines and/or glucocorticoids are not reliable interventions to prevent biphasic anaphylaxis, although evidence supports a role for antihistamine and/or glucocorticoid premedication in specific chemotherapy protocols and rush aeroallergen immunotherapy. Evidence is lacking to support the role of antihistamines and/or glucocorticoid routine premedication in patients receiving low- or iso-osmolar contrast material to prevent recurrent radiocontrast media anaphylaxis. Epinephrine is the first-line pharmacotherapy for uniphasic and/or biphasic anaphylaxis. After diagnosis and treatment of anaphylaxis, all patients should be kept under observation until symptoms have fully resolved. All patients with anaphylaxis should receive education on anaphylaxis and risk of recurrence, trigger avoidance, self-injectable epinephrine education, referral to an allergist, and be educated about thresholds for further care.

The pathophysiology of anaphylaxis

Anaphylaxis is a severe systemic hypersensitivity reaction that is rapid in onset; characterized by life-threatening airway, breathing, and/or circulatory problems; and usually associated with skin and mucosal changes. Because it can be triggered in some persons by minute amounts of antigen (eg, certain foods or single insect stings), anaphylaxis can be considered the most aberrant example of an imbalance between the cost and benefit of an immune response. This review will describe current understanding of the immunopathogenesis and pathophysiology of anaphylaxis, focusing on the roles of IgE and IgG antibodies, immune effector cells, and mediators thought to contribute to examples of the disorder. Evidence from studies of anaphylaxis in human subjects will be discussed, as well as insights gained from analyses of animal models, including mice genetically deficient in the antibodies, antibody receptors, effector cells, or mediators implicated in anaphylaxis and mice that have been "humanized" for some of these elements. We also review possible host factors that might influence the occurrence or severity of anaphylaxis. Finally, we will speculate about anaphylaxis from an evolutionary perspective and argue that, in the context of severe envenomation by arthropods or reptiles, anaphylaxis might even provide a survival advantage.

Characterization of platelet-activating factor-induced cutaneous edema and erythema in dogs

OBJECTIVE To characterize platelet-activating factor (PAF)-induced edema and erythema in the skin of dogs and compare those reactions with histamine-induced cutaneous reactions. ANIMALS 6 healthy Beagles. PROCEDURES Experiments were performed at ≥ 2-week intervals. Each dog received ID injections (5 μg/site) of PAF C16, PAF C18, lyso-PAF, and histamine. Edema (mean diameter) and erythema scores (none, mild, moderate, or severe) were assessed 30 minutes after the injections. Dogs received ID injections of PAF and histamine each with various concentrations of WEB 2086 (PAF receptor antagonist) or underwent ID testing with PAF and histamine before and 3 hours after oral administration of cetirizine hydrochloride or prednisolone (at 2 doses each). RESULTS ID injections of PAF C16 and PAF C18, but not lyso-PAF, induced comparable levels of edema and erythema. The PAF-induced edema and erythema peaked at 30 minutes and lasted for 6 hours after the injection; histamine-induced edema and erythema peaked at 30 minutes and lasted for 3 hours after the injection. Edema sizes and erythema scores were significantly smaller and lower, respectively, for PAF than for histamine. The WEB 2086 inhibited PAF-induced but not histamine-induced edema and erythema. Cetirizine slightly, but significantly, repressed PAF-induced edema and erythema as well as histamine-induced cutaneous reactions. Prednisolone suppressed both PAF-induced and histamine-induced edema and erythema. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE In canine skin, the duration of PAF-induced inflammation was longer than that of histamine-induced inflammation. The PAF- and histamine-induced cutaneous reactions were effectively suppressed by oral administration of prednisolone. The importance of PAF in dogs with anaphylaxis and allergic disorders warrants further investigation.

Platelet-activating factor (PAF) induces wheal and flare skin reactions independent of mast cell degranulation

BACKGROUND

Platelet-activating factor (PAF) causes wheal and flare responses which are abrogated by H1-antihistamines giving rise to the hypothesis that PAF-induced wheal development is secondary to histamine release from dermal mast cells. But is this hypothesis correct?

METHODS

Wheal and flare responses were induced by intradermal injection of PAF, codeine and histamine in 14 healthy volunteers. Dermal histamine and PGD2 contractions were measured using microdialysis.

RESULTS

PAF, unlike histamine and codeine, did not cause a statistically significant rise in mean histamine levels with ten persons showing negligible histamine release. Codeine caused a significant but variable histamine release, ranging from 29 to 282 ng/ml. Codeine, but not PAF or histamine, caused a small but statistically significant release of PGD2.

CONCLUSION

Wheal and flare reactions in human skin induced by PAF are not associated with histamine release and, therefore, appear to be independent of mast cell degranulation.

Efficacy and safety of ketotifen fumarate 0.025% in the conjunctival antigen challenge model of ocular allergic conjunctivitis

PURPOSE

To determine the duration of action of ketotifen 0.025% eye drops vs placebo taken as single or multiple doses in an allergen challenge model.

DESIGN

Two randomized, multicenter, double-masked, contralateral placebo-controlled studies, one a single-dose and one a multiple-dose study.

METHODS

Two conjunctival provocation tests (CPTs) were initially conducted to confirm reproducibility of subject responses in both studies. Subjects in study 1 (n = 87) received single doses of ketotifen in one eye and placebo in the other 15 minutes, 6 hours, and 8 hours before CPT. Subjects in study 2 (n = 85) received ketotifen or placebo once 8 hours before CPT. Single-dose efficacy results were used to further qualify a subject as a responder. Responders were re-randomized to a 4-week twice daily dosing regimen with a CPT 8 hours after the final dose. In both studies, ocular symptoms were assessed at three time points 3 to 15 minutes after challenge. There were no significant differences in adverse events between groups.

RESULTS

For both studies, ocular itching and vascular injection were significantly reduced (P <.003) at all time points after instillation of ketotifen, with a maximum reduction at 7 minutes postchallenge. In study 2, chemosis, tearing, and lid swelling were also assessed and were significantly reduced (P <.008) after instillation of ketotifen.

CONCLUSIONS

Ketotifen 0.025% eye drops were safe and statistically effective in preventing ocular itching, injection, and other signs and symptoms of allergic conjunctivitis at 15 minutes, 6 hours, and 8 hours after a single dose and at 8 hours after the final dose of a 4-week twice daily regimen.

Effect of intravenous platelet-activating factor on bovine pulmonary mast cells

The effect of platelet-activating factor (PAF) on bovine pulmonary mast cells (MCs) was investigated in calves aged 1-4 months. PAF was administered over a 5-min period at a rate of 50 ng/kg/min to six animals, which were killed approximately 10 min later. No macroscopical lesions were observed in the lung tissue of five control calves. On semi-thin toluidine-blue stained sections, MC cytoplasm showed profuse deep-blue granulation. In the lung tissues of PAF-treated calves, striking interstitial, alveolar and interlobular oedema and emphysema were observed. MC granules occurred at the periphery of the cytoplasm and MC nuclei were easily detectable. Moreover, the number of granules in the MC cytoplasm was remarkably low. A few granules with some metachromatic material were sometimes detected outside the cell limits. Ultrastructurally, the matrix pattern of the MC granules in lung tissues of control calves was either amorphous or granular. In lung tissues of the PAF-treated calves, the granular matrix pattern was pronounced, varying from fine- to coarse-grained, and the MCs were of reduced size, with many filiform processes and exocytotic vesicles. These findings indicate that pulmonary MC degranulation was induced by PAF in healthy calves.

Effect of cetirizine, a potent H1 antagonist, on platelet activating factor induced bronchoconstriction in asthma

Effect of cetirizine, a potent and specific H1 receptor antagonist, was examined on platelet activating factor-induced bronchoconstriction in 10 patients (5 male, mean [s.e.m.] aged 37.4 [3.6] years) with mild asthma in a placebo controlled, double-blind cross-over study. Airway responses were assessed by measuring specific airway conductance (SGaw). Patients were challenged with a single dose (12-96 micrograms) of PAF that had previously produced a 35% fall in SGaw. PAF challenges were performed after single dose (15 mg) and 1 week's treatment (15 mg twice daily) of cetirizine. There was no significant difference in pre- and post-treatment baseline values of SGaw on different study days and the percentage changes after cetirizine were 38.7 (7.01) and 45.6 (5.52) compared to 50.2 (2.89) and 43.9 (7.26) with placebo respectively. Similarly mean (s.e.m.) area under curve (AUC-SGaw/time course response) was 391 (143) and 514 (85) with cetirizine compared to 565 (37) and 461 (94) with placebo respectively. The difference was not statistically significant. There was no difference in facial flushing and feeling of warmth between cetirizine and placebo. We conclude that PAF induced bronchoconstriction in humans is not mediated by histamine release and that H1 receptor antagonists do not modify PAF induced bronchoconstriction.

Further studies on the actions of endothelin-1 on blood flow in human skin

When injected into human skin, endothelin-1 produces intense vasoconstriction localized to the site of the injection, but this area of vasoconstriction is surrounded by vasodilatation which spreads several centimetres from the injection site. The vasodilatation induced by intradermal injection of endothelin-1 (63 pmol) into human skin is prevented by local anaesthetic. Pretreatment of human skin with capsaicin also inhibits this response. Pretreatment of subjects with the selective histamine H1-receptor antagonist cetirizine, 10 mg orally 4 h before intradermal injections, inhibited vasodilatation caused by the intradermal injection of histamine (750 pmol), endothelin-1 (63 pmol), and carbachol (750 pmol). Endothelin-1 (0.3-10 microM) and carbachol (1-30 microM) failed to induce histamine release from rat peritoneal mast cells. We conclude that the vasodilatation caused by intradermal injection of endothelin-1 into human skin is neurogenic and is probably mediated by neuropeptide-containing primary afferent neurones. Because neither carbachol nor endothelin-1 cause histamine release from mast cells, our data suggest that histamine release from mast cells at the effector end of the axon reflex is responsible for the carbachol- and endothelin-induced vasodilatation in human skin.