Dextran sedimentation induces a difference in the percentage of hypodense eosinophils in peripheral blood between children with allergic asthma and healthy controls

Historic overview of allergy research in the Netherlands

Research in allergy has a long history in the Netherlands, although the relation with immunology has not always been appreciated. In many aspects Dutch researchers have made major contribution in allergy research. This ranges from the first characterization of house dust mite as an important allergen, the first characterization of human Th2 and Th1 T cell clones, to the development of diagnostic test systems. In this overview Aalberse and Knol have made an overview of the major contributions of Dutch immunologists in allergy.

The metabolomics of asthma: novel diagnostic potential

Asthma is one of the most common chronic illnesses, especially in children. Reaching the diagnosis of asthma and its management are more difficult than for other chronic illnesses. For example, asthma is a heterogeneous syndrome with many clinical classifications based on patient symptoms, lung function, and response to therapy. The symptoms and objective measurements of lung function, often used to guide therapy, are largely based on the inflammation of the airways. Because measuring airway dysfunction and inflammation in a typical clinical setting is difficult, it is often not done. Metabolomics is the study of small molecules generated from cellular metabolic activity. It is possible that the metabolic profile of a patient with a chronic illness such as asthma is different from that of a healthy patient or from a patient with another respiratory illness. Furthermore, if this metabolome could be measured, it might also vary with disease severity. The pattern of metabolites becomes the diagnostic representing the disease. This article outlines the more recent work that has been done to develop the metabolomic profile of asthma.

Asthma

Asthma has been recognized as a disease since the earliest times. In the Corpus Hippocraticum, Hippocrates used the term “ασθμα” to indicate any form of breathing difficulty manifesting itself by panting. Aretaeus of Cappadocia, a well-known Greek physician (second century A.D.), is credited with providing the first detailed description of an asthma attack [13], and to Celsus it was a disease with wheezing and noisy, violent breathing. In the history of Rome, we find many members of the Julio-Claudian family affected with probable atopic respiratory disorders: Caesar Augustus suffered from bronchoconstriction, seasonal rhinitis as well as a highly pruritic skin disease. Claudius suffered from rhinoconjunctivitis and Britannicus was allergic to horse dander [529]. Maimonides (1136–1204) warned that to neglect treatment of asthma could prove fatal, whereas until the 19th century, European scholars defined it as “nervous asthma,” a term that was given to mean a defect of conductivity of the ninth pair of cranial nerves.

Eosinophils isolated by magnetic cell sorting respond poorly to lipid chemoattractants

BACKGROUND

Eosinophils play an important role in allergic inflammation. In vitro methods to isolate human eosinophils for the study of chemotactic responses are essential in understanding the mechanisms involved in tissue eosinophilia.

OBJECTIVE

We compared LTB4 and PAF-induced chemotactic responses of eosinophils isolated by the standard Percoll (positive selection) versus the magnetic cell separation systems (MACS) (negative selection) technique.

METHODS

Discontinuous Percoll gradients were preceded by dextran and Ficoll-Paque steps, and followed by gelatin wash and red blood cell (RBC) lysis. MACS isolation included Percoll 1.090 g/mL layering and RBC lysis; incubation with CD16 antibody conjugated to magnetic beads (to bind neutrophils); and isolation of eluate from column positioned in magnet.

RESULTS

Percoll-isolated eosinophils migrated to the lipid mediators, LTB4 and PAF, in a dose-responsive fashion. Although MACS isolation provided a greater number and higher purity of eosinophils, these eosinophils migrated less to LTB4 and PAF. Neither dextran sedimentation, dextran and Ficoll-Paque, nor dextran Ficoll-Paque and Percoll prior to MACS isolation reversed the decreased chemotactic responses observed with MACS isolated eosinophils. Further, Percoll-isolated eosinophils further purified with CD16 MicroBeads did not respond as well to LTB4 or PAF.

CONCLUSIONS

The technique used to isolate eosinophils clearly affects the chemotactic responsiveness of this cell to LTB4 and PAF. Since several in vivo studies suggest that LTB4 and PAF are eosinophil chemoattractants, Percoll isolation of these cells might be more appropriate for studies involving eosinophil chemotactic responses to these lipid mediators.

Isolation technique alters eosinophil migration response to IL-8

Disparate reports exist on the eosinophil chemotactic capacity of interleukin-8 (IL-8). We hypothesized that the difference is due to the methods used to purify eosinophils. We therefore compared the eosinophilotactic capacity of IL-8 on human cells isolated by Percoll (positive selection) vs. magnetic cell separation system (MACS) (negative selection). Discontinuous Percoll gradients were preceded by dextran and Ficoll-Paque steps, and followed by gelatin wash and red blood cell (RBC) lysis. MACS isolation included: Percoll 1.090 g/ml layering and RBC lysis; incubation with CD16 antibody conjugated to magnetic beads (to bind neutrophils); and isolation of eluate from column positioned in magnet. Percoll isolated eosinophils migrated to IL-8 in a dose-responsive fashion. Although MACS isolation provided a greater number and higher purity of eosinophils, these eosinophils did not migrate to IL-8. Neither dextran sedimentation, Ficoll-Paque and Percoll prior to, nor Percoll discontinuous gradients subsequent to, MACS isolation reversed the negative chemotactic response. Moreover, Percoll-isolated eosinophils further purified with CD16 MicroBeads no longer chemotactically responded to IL-8. This inhibition was not due to change in eosinophil purity, a loss of eosinophil adhesion molecules or activation markers, the presence of a soluble neutrophil or eosinophil inhibitor or the effect of the magnet. Thus, the technique used to isolate eosinophils clearly affects the chemotactic responsiveness of this cell to IL-8. Since several in vivo studies suggest that IL-8 is an eosinophil chemoattractant, Percoll isolation of these cells might be more appropriate for studies involving eosinophil chemotactic responses to IL-8.