Allergy to nuts: how much of a problem really is this?

Allergy to hazelnut in adults: a two-step study

BACKGROUND

Although hazelnut consumption is very high in Turkey, the prevalence of hazelnut allergy is still unknown. This study's objective was to investigate the prevalence of hazelnut sensitisation and to verify its clinical importance using double-blind, placebo-controlled challenge (DBPCFC) in an adult population.

METHODS

Prick-to-prick skin tests were performed with fresh hazelnut in 904 patients admitted to the allergy department. Among the 904 subjects, 20 patients with a history of allergic reactions to hazelnut and/or positive skin tests were recalled for further evaluation. Specific IgE was measured in these subjects. Eleven (11/20) patients accepted to undergo DBPCFC with hazelnut.

RESULTS

Among the 904 individuals, the history of reactions to hazelnut was positive in 16 subjects (1.8%); prick-to-prick skin tests were positive in 13 (1.4%); prick tests with the commercial product were positive in nine (0.9%); and history plus skin tests were positive in 16 (1.8%). Specific IgE to hazelnut was positive in only three patients. DBPCFC was conducted in 11 subjects with a positivity rate of 63.6% (7/11). We observed six mild and one moderate systemic reactions during the DBPCFC. Among seven subjects with a positive DBPCFC, six (85.7%) had a history of hazelnut allergy, and five (71.4%) had both history and skin test positivity.

CONCLUSION

Skin test sensitisation to hazelnut was found to be 1.76% (16/904) which is similar to the sensitisation rate in previous reports. However, DBPCFC was positive in 63% of cases with a history of hazelnut allergy and/or positive skin tests in this study. These results indicate that the presence of history with a positive skin test can be suggestive of hazelnut allergy; however an oral food challenge is needed to confirm the diagnosis.

Household-level technologies to improve the availability and preparation of adequate and safe complementary foods

Plant-based complementary foods are the main source of nutrients for many young children in developing countries. They may, however, present problems in providing nutritionally adequate and safe diets for older infants and young children. The high starch content leads to low-nutrient diets that are bulky and dense, with high levels of antinutritive factors such as phytates, tannins, lectins, and enzyme inhibitors. Phytates impair mineral bioavailability, lectins interfere with intestinal structure, and enzyme inhibitors inhibit digestive enzymes. In addition, there is often microbial contamination, which leads to diarrhea, growth-faltering, and impaired development, and the presence of chemical contaminants may lead to neurological disease and goiter. The fact that some fruits containing carotenoids are only available seasonally contributes to the vulnerability of children receiving predominantly plant-based diets. Traditional household food technologies have been used for centuries to improve the quality and safety of complementary foods. These include dehulling, peeling, soaking, germination, fermentation, and drying. While modern communities tend to reject these technologies in favor of more convenient fast-food preparations, there is now a resurgence of interest in older technologies as a possible means of improving the quality and safety of complementary foods when the basic diet cannot be changed for economic reasons. This paper describes the biology, safety, practicability, and acceptability of these traditional processes at the household or community level, as well as the gaps in research, so that more effective policies and programs can be implemented to improve the quality and safety of complementary foods.