Indirect bronchial hyper-responsiveness: the coming of age of a specific group of bronchial challenges

ERS technical standard on bronchial challenge testing: pathophysiology and methodology of indirect airway challenge testing

Recently, this international task force reported the general considerations for bronchial challenge testing and the performance of the methacholine challenge test, a "direct" airway challenge test. Here, the task force provides an updated description of the pathophysiology and the methods to conduct indirect challenge tests. Because indirect challenge tests trigger airway narrowing through the activation of endogenous pathways that are involved in asthma, indirect challenge tests tend to be specific for asthma and reveal much about the biology of asthma, but may be less sensitive than direct tests for the detection of airway hyperresponsiveness. We provide recommendations for the conduct and interpretation of hyperpnoea challenge tests such as dry air exercise challenge and eucapnic voluntary hyperpnoea that provide a single strong stimulus for airway narrowing. This technical standard expands the recommendations to additional indirect tests such as hypertonic saline, mannitol and adenosine challenge that are incremental tests, but still retain characteristics of other indirect challenges. Assessment of airway hyperresponsiveness, with direct and indirect tests, are valuable tools to understand and to monitor airway function and to characterise the underlying asthma phenotype to guide therapy. The tests should be interpreted within the context of the clinical features of asthma.

Realising the potential of various inhaled airway challenge agents through improved delivery to the lungs

Inhaled airway challenges provoke bronchoconstriction in susceptible subjects and are a pivotal tool in the diagnosis and monitoring of obstructive lung diseases, both in the clinic and in the development of new respiratory medicines. This article reviews the main challenge agents that are in use today (methacholine, mannitol, adenosine, allergens, endotoxin) and emphasises the importance of controlling how these agents are administered. There is a danger that the optimal value of these challenge agents may not be realised due to suboptimal inhaled delivery; thus considerations for effective and reproducible challenge delivery are provided. This article seeks to increase awareness of the importance of precise delivery of inhaled agents used to challenge the airways for diagnosis and research, and is intended as a stepping stone towards much-needed standardisation and harmonisation in the administration of inhaled airway challenge agents.

Pathogenesis of COPD and Asthma

Asthma and COPD remain two diseases of the respiratory tract with unmet medical needs. This review considers the current state of play with respect to what is known about the underlying pathogenesis of these two chronic inflammatory diseases of the lung. The review highlights why they are different conditions requiring different approaches to treatment and provides a backdrop for the subsequent chapters in this volume discussing recent advances in the pharmacology and treatment of asthma and COPD.

Bronchial hyperresponsiveness in childhood: A narrative review

Bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) is an important but not asthma-specific characteristic and can be assessed by direct and indirect methods, based on the stimulus causing airway obstruction. BHR has been proposed as a prognostic marker of asthma severity and persistence, and may also be used to control pharmacological management of asthma. The most recent data on the prevalence and development of BHR in childhood and its predictive value for subsequent asthma development in late adolescence and adulthood is discussed in this review. According to the BHR-related scientific articles written in the English language and indexed in the publicly searchable PubMed database, the prevalence of BHR varies based upon the methods used to assess it and the population examined. In general, however, BHR prevalence is reduced as children grow older, in both healthy and asthmatic populations. While asthma can be predicted by BHR, the predictive value is limited. Reduced lung function, allergic sensitization, female sex, and early respiratory illness have been identified as risk factors for BHR. The collective studies further indicate that BHR is a dynamic feature related to asthma, but asymptomatic BHR is also common. Ultimately, the prevalence of BHR varies depending on the population, the environment, and the evaluation methods used. While both the methacholine challenge and the exercise test may predict asthma in adolescence or early adulthood, the predictive value is higher for the methacholine challenge compared to the exercise test. The collective data presented in the present study demonstrate how BHR develops through childhood and its relation to bronchial asthma.

Does airway hyperresponsiveness monitoring lead to improved asthma control?

The current guidelines recommend an approach to asthma management based on asthma control, rather than asthma severity. Although several specific questionnaires have been developed and control criteria have been established based on clinical guidelines, the evaluation of asthma control is still not optimal. In general, these indicators provide adequate assessment of current control, but they are more limited when estimating future risk. There is much evidence demonstrating the persistence of airway inflammation and airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) in patients with total control. Therefore, the objective of this review was to analyse the possible role of AHR monitoring as an instrument for assessing asthma control. We will evaluate its capacity as an indicator for future risk, both for estimating the possibility of clinical deterioration and loss of lung function or exacerbations. Furthermore, its relationship with inhaled corticosteroid treatment will be analysed, while emphasizing its capacity for predicting response and adjusting dosage, as well as information about the capability of AHR for monitoring treatment. Last of all, we will discuss the main limitations and emerging opportunities of AHR as an assessment instrument for asthma control.

Longitudinal changes in clinical outcomes in older patients with asthma, COPD and asthma-COPD overlap syndrome

BACKGROUND

The progression of obstructive airway diseases (OADs) including asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma-COPD overlap syndrome in older adults is not well understood.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the prognosis of OADs and to identify potential determinants for longitudinal changes in clinical outcomes.

METHODS

We consecutively recruited 99 older adults (>55 years) with OADs who underwent a multidimensional assessment at baseline and 4 years which involved spirometry, 6-min walk distance (6MWD), assessments of health status (Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire, SGRQ), comorbidity, and serum and sputum biomarkers. All-cause mortality and respiratory hospitalisation during the follow-up period were recorded. Clinical outcomes were compared between basal and final visits, and changes in clinical outcomes were compared among asthma, COPD and asthma-COPD overlap groups. Associations between clinical parameters, biomarkers and prognosis were examined.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 4.2 years, outcome data were available for 75 (75.8%) patients. There were 16 (16.2%) deaths. The BODE index predicted all-cause mortality in older people with OADs. While spirometry, 6MWD and SGRQ deteriorated significantly over the 4 years, there was significant heterogeneity in the longitudinal changes in these clinical outcomes. Participants with COPD had a significant decline in FEV1 (p = 0.003), SGRQ (p = 0.030) and 6MWD [decline of 75.5 (93.4) m, p = 0.024]. The change in 6MWD was lower in the asthma-COPD overlap group. Airflow reversibility was associated with a reduced decline in 6MWD.

CONCLUSION

COPD patients had a poor prognosis compared with asthma and asthma-COPD overlap patients. The BODE index is a useful prognostic indicator in older adults with OADs. Both airway disease diagnosis and BODE index warrant specific attention in clinical practice.

Safety profile and clinical activity of multiple subcutaneous doses of MEDI-528, a humanized anti-interleukin-9 monoclonal antibody, in two randomized phase 2a studies in subjects with asthma

Background

Interleukin-9 (IL-9)-targeted therapies may offer a novel approach for treating asthmatics. Two randomized placebo-controlled studies were conducted to assess the safety profile and potential efficacy of multiple subcutaneous doses of MEDI-528, a humanized anti-IL-9 monoclonal antibody, in asthmatics.

Methods

Study 1: adults (18-65 years) with mild asthma received MEDI-528 (0.3, 1, 3 mg/kg) or placebo subcutaneously twice weekly for 4 weeks. Study 2: adults (18-50 years) with stable, mild to moderate asthma and exercise-induced bronchoconstriction received 50 mg MEDI-528 or placebo subcutaneously twice weekly for 4 weeks. Adverse events (AEs), pharmacokinetics (PK), immunogenicity, asthma control (including asthma exacerbations), and exercise challenge test were evaluated in study 1, study 2, or both.

Results

In study 1 (N = 36), MEDI-528 showed linear serum PK; no anti-MEDI-528 antibodies were detected. Asthma control: 1/27 MEDI-528-treated subjects had 1 asthma exacerbation, and 2/9 placebo-treated subjects had a total of 4 asthma exacerbations (one considered a serious AE). In study 2, MEDI-528 (n = 7) elicited a trend in the reduction in mean maximum decrease in FEV₁ post-exercise compared to placebo (n = 2) (-6.49% MEDI-528 vs -12.60% placebo; -1.40% vs -20.10%; -5.04% vs -15.20% at study days 28, 56, and 150, respectively). Study 2 was halted prematurely due to a serious AE in an asymptomatic MEDI-528-treated subject who had an abnormal brain magnetic resonance imaging that was found to be an artifact on further evaluation.

Conclusions

In these studies, MEDI-528 showed an acceptable safety profile and findings suggestive of clinical activity that support continued study in subjects with mild to moderate asthma.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials (NCT): NCT00507130 and ClinicalTrials (NCT): NCT00590720

Cysteinyl leukotriene antagonism inhibits bronchoconstriction in response to hypertonic saline inhalation in asthma

BACKGROUND

In asthma, cysteinyl leukotrienes (CysLTs) play varying roles in the bronchomotor response to multiple provocative stimuli. The contribution of CysLTs on the airway's response to hypertonic saline (HS) inhalation in asthma is unknown. Whether polymorphisms in the leukotriene biosynthetic pathway affect the contribution of CysLTs to this response is also unknown.

METHODS

In a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled cross-over study, mild and moderate asymptomatic asthmatics underwent inhaled 3% HS challenge by doubling the duration of nebulization (0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 min) 2 h after one dose of montelukast (a CysLT receptor 1 [CysLTR1] antagonist) or placebo, and after three-week courses. We examined the effect of the leukotriene C(4) synthase (LTC(4)S) polymorphism (A-444C) on the efficacy of montelukast against HS inhalation in an exploratory manner.

RESULTS

In 37 subjects, 2 h after administration of montelukast, the mean provocative dose of HS required to cause a 20% drop in FEV(1) (HS-PD(20)) increased by 59% (9.17 ml after placebo vs. 14.55 ml after montelukast, p=0.0154). Three weeks of cysLTR1 antagonism increased the HS-PD(20) by 84% (10.97 vs. 20.21 ml, p=0.0002). Three weeks of CysLTR1 antagonism appeared to produce greater effects on blocking bronchial hyper-responsiveness (2 h vs. three-week HS-PD(20) values 14.55 vs. 20.21 ml respectively, p=0.0898). We did not observe an effect of the LTC(4)S polymorphism on the response to CysLTR1 antagonism in this cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

A significant proportion of HS-induced bronchoconstriction is mediated by release of leukotrienes as evidenced by substantial acute inhibition with a CysLTR1 antagonist. There was a trend toward greater inhibition of bronchial responsiveness with three weeks of therapy as opposed to acute CysLTR1 antagonism. Clinicaltrials.gov registration number NCT00116324.

Indirect challenge tests: Airway hyperresponsiveness in asthma: its measurement and clinical significance

Indirect challenges cause the release of endogenous mediators that cause the airway smooth muscle to contract and the airways to narrow. Airway sensitivity to indirect challenges is reduced or even totally inhibited by treatment with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), so a positive response to an indirect stimulus is believed to reflect active airway inflammation. The indirect challenges commonly used in pulmonary function laboratories include exercise, eucapnic voluntary hyperpnea, hypertonic (4.5%) saline, and mannitol. Exercise was the first test to be standardized and was used to identify exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB). The inhibition of EIB in young children by sodium cromoglycate led to the concept that mast cells were important very early in the onset of asthma. All of these indirect challenges are associated with the release of mast cell mediators (eg, prostaglandins, leukotrienes, and histamine). The hypertonic saline and mannitol challenges arose from the concept that EIB was caused by an increased osmolarity of the airway surface with release of mediators. These osmotic aerosols simplified testing with indirect challenges in the laboratory, improving the potential to identify currently active asthma. Although hyperresponsiveness to indirect challenges is frequently associated with a sputum eosinophilia, it is not a prerequisite because the mast cell is the most important source of mediators. The mechanism for ICS reducing hyperresponsiveness to indirect challenges likely involves both mast cells and eosinophils. Indirect challenges are appropriate to inform further on both the pathogenesis of asthma and the role of antiinflammatory agents in its treatment.

Monitoring asthma therapy using indirect bronchial provocation tests

OBJECTIVES

Bronchial provocation tests that assess airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) are known to be useful in assisting the diagnosis of asthma and in monitoring inhaled corticosteroid therapy. We reviewed the use of bronchial provocation tests that use stimuli that act indirectly for monitoring the benefits of inhaled corticosteroids.

DATA SOURCE

Published clinical trials investigating the effect of inhaled corticosteroids on bronchial hyperresponsiveness in persons with asthma were used for this review.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies using indirect stimuli to provoke airway narrowing such as exercise, eucapnic voluntary hyperventilation, cold air hyperventilation, hypertonic saline, mannitol, or adenosine monophosphate (AMP) to assess the effect of inhaled corticosteroids were selected.

RESULTS

Stimuli acting indirectly result in the release of a variety of bronchoconstricting mediators such as leukotrienes, prostaglandins, and histamine, from cells such as mast cells and eosinophils. A positive response to indirect stimuli is suggestive of active inflammation and AHR that is consistent with a diagnosis of asthma. Persons with a positive response to indirect stimuli benefit from daily treatment with inhaled corticosteroids. Symptoms and lung function are not useful to predict the long-term success of inhaled corticosteroid dose as they usually resolve rapidly, and well before inflammation and AHR has resolved. Following treatment, AHR to indirect stimuli is attenuated. Further, during long-term treatment, asthmatics can become as non-responsive as non-asthmatic healthy persons, suggesting that asthma is not active.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-responsiveness to indirect bronchial provocation tests following inhaled corticosteroids occurs weeks to months following the resolution of symptoms and lung function. Non-responsiveness to indirect stimuli may provide a goal for adequate therapy with inhaled corticosteroids.

Diagnostic properties of inhaled mannitol in the diagnosis of asthma: a population study

BACKGROUND

A new indirect bronchial provocation test measuring airway responsiveness by using inhaled mannitol was recently introduced.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to examine the diagnostic properties of airway responsiveness to inhaled mannitol in the assessment of asthma in an unselected sample of young adults.

METHODS

Two hundred thirty-eight young adults randomly drawn from the nationwide civil registration list were challenged with inhaled, dry-powder mannitol. A respiratory specialist, blind to the test results, classified all 238 subjects with respect to the presence of asthma. The classification was based on respiratory symptoms, spirometric results, atopy, and fraction of exhaled nitric oxide values and response to inhaled beta(2)-agonists. On this basis, sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were assessed to different cutoff values of the test. A receiver operating characteristic curve was constructed, and the accuracy of the test, defined as the area under the curve, was computed.

RESULTS

Fifty-one (21.4%) subjects had current asthma. Of 33 subjects with airway hyperresponsiveness to mannitol, 30 had current asthma. The specificity and sensitivity were 98.4% (95% CI, 96.2% to 99.4%) and 58.8% (95% CI, 50.7% to 62.6%), respectively. The positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were 90.9% (95% CI, 78.4% to 96.8%) and 89.8 (95% CI, 87.7% to 90.7%), respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.89 (95% CI, 0.83-0.95).

CONCLUSIONS

In an unselected sample of young adults, bronchial provocation with inhaled dry-powder mannitol had a high diagnostic specificity for the diagnosis of asthma.

The bronchial response to mannitol is attenuated by a previous methacholine test: but not vice versa

AIM

To examine the airway response to inhaled mannitol performed before or after a methacholine challenge test in a group of asthmatics with different levels of disease.

METHODS

A total of 48 asthmatics, 18-73 years of age, were included in the study. Two pairs of challenges were performed in a random order on two separate days > or =24 h apart: either with mannitol performed first on day one, followed > or =1 h by methacholine, and methacholine as the first on day two, followed > or =1 h by mannitol or vice versa. A questionnaire-based interview was performed and lung function, exhaled nitric oxide, skin prick test, and blood eosinophil count were measured.

RESULTS

A total of 44% of the asthmatics used inhaled corticosteroids and 48% were atopic. The airway response to mannitol was attenuated when mannitol was given after methacholine, compared with the response to mannitol when it was given first [log response dose ratio (RDR): 1.42 vs. 1.60 (P=0.004)], whereas the response to methacholine was unchanged in the opposite test order [log RDR: 0.81 vs. 0.96 (P=0.102)].

CONCLUSION

Bronchial challenges with inhaled mannitol and methacholine may be performed on the same day but provocation with mannitol should be performed before methacholine.

The validity of induced sputum and bronchoalveolar lavage in childhood asthma

There are a number of useful direct airway sampling procedures to help diagnose and monitor asthma in patients. However, non-invasive techniques are the ideal, especially in children, given the necessity of safe and repeatable measurements to monitor treatment efficacy and disease progression. Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) may be too invasive for clinical use in children, while questions still surround the utility of induced sputum (IS). More novel techniques, such as fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FE(NO)) and exhaled breath condensate (EBC), are still unproven. Eosinophilic airway inflammation is a major feature of childhood asthma, and it has been revealed as a major treatment target with inhaled corticosteroids. Moreover, treatment protocols governed by sputum eosinophil counts may be more efficacious - by reducing the frequency and severity of exacerbations - than treatment based on clinical symptoms and other traditional objective measures of lung function. The selection of an appropriate airway inflammation monitoring technique must take everything into consideration, including safety, reproducibility, repeatability, sensitivity to treatment, and the overall clinical/research goals.

Comparison of mannitol and methacholine to predict exercise-induced bronchoconstriction and a clinical diagnosis of asthma

BACKGROUND

Asthma can be difficult to diagnose, but bronchial provocation with methacholine, exercise or mannitol is helpful when used to identify bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR), a key feature of the disease. The utility of these tests in subjects with signs and symptoms of asthma but without a clear diagnosis has not been investigated. We investigated the sensitivity and specificity of mannitol to identify exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) as a manifestation of BHR; compared this with methacholine; and compared the sensitivity and specificity of mannitol and methacholine for a clinician diagnosis of asthma.

METHODS

509 people (6-50 yr) were enrolled, 78% were atopic, median FEV1 92.5% predicted, and a low NAEPPII asthma score of 1.2. Subjects with symptoms of seasonal allergy were excluded. BHR to exercise was defined as a > or = 10% fall in FEV1 on at least one of two tests, to methacholine a PC20 < or = 16 mg/ml and to mannitol a 15% fall in FEV1 at < or = 635 mg or a 10% fall between doses. The clinician diagnosis of asthma was made on examination, history, skin tests, questionnaire and response to exercise but they were blind to the mannitol and methacholine results.

RESULTS

Mannitol and methacholine were therapeutically equivalent to identify EIB, a clinician diagnosis of asthma, and prevalence of BHR. The sensitivity/specificity of mannitol to identify EIB was 59%/65% and for methacholine it was 56%/69%. The BHR was mild. Mean EIB % fall in FEV1 in subjects positive to exercise was 19%, (SD 9.2), mannitol PD15 158 (CI:129,193) mg, and methacholine PC20 2.1(CI:1.7, 2.6) mg/ml. The prevalence of BHR was the same: for exercise (43.5%), mannitol (44.8%), and methacholine (41.6%) with a test agreement between 62 & 69%. The sensitivity and specificity for a clinician diagnosis of asthma was 56%/73% for mannitol and 51%/75% for methacholine. The sensitivity increased to 73% and 72% for mannitol and methacholine when two exercise tests were positive.

CONCLUSION

In this group with normal FEV1, mild symptoms, and mild BHR, the sensitivity and specificity for both mannitol and methacholine to identify EIB and a clinician diagnosis of asthma were equivalent, but lower than previously documented in well-defined populations.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This was a multi-center trial comprising 25 sites across the United States of America.

The reproducibility of adenosine monophosphate bronchial challenges in mild, steroid-naive asthmatics

AIMS

Repeated adenosine monophosphate (AMP) challenges are used to assess drug efficacy in clinical trials of mild, steroid-naive asthmatics. Refractoriness has been reported after repeated challenges over short intervals. This study evaluated possible tachyphylaxis after repeated AMP challenges at 12 and 24 h in mild, steroid-naive asthmatics.

METHODS

This was an open, three-way crossover study. Twenty-six steroid-naive asthmatic subjects were randomized to the following AMP challenge regimens separated by 7-14 days: (A) challenge at 08.00 h, repeated 24 h later; (B) challenge at 08.00 h, repeated 12 and 24 h later; (C) challenge at 20.00 h, repeated 12 h later. Comparisons within day were assessed using 90% confidence intervals (CIs). Non-inferiority approach taken with 1 doubling concentration (DC) as a clinically relevant difference.

RESULTS

Regimen A: Significant increase in AMP reactivity at 24 h. Mean DC difference was 0.6 (90% CI 0.24, 0.96). Regimen B: No evidence of difference between AMP reactivity at 08.00 h and a repeated challenge 12 h later. Repeated challenge at 24 h caused a significant increase in provocation concentration (PC)(20) compared with 12 h (mean DC difference 0.48, 90% CI 0.02, 0.95) and 0 h (mean DC difference 0.82, 90% CI 0.49, 1.14 - the upper CI exceeds the criteria of 1 DC). Challenge regimen C: No difference between challenges; mean DC difference of 0.28 (90% CI -0.2, 0.76).

CONCLUSION

The small decline in AMP reactivity during repeated challenges was not consistently observed, and was small compared with the known effects of inhaled drugs.

Bronchial responsiveness during esophageal acid infusion

Among the possible mechanisms explaining the worsening of asthma due to gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is the increase in bronchial hyperresponsiveness. The effects of GERD on bronchial hyperresponsiveness in patients with bronchial asthma have yet to be studied in significant detail. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of esophageal acid perfusion on bronchial responsiveness to bradykinin in patients with both asthma and GERD. In 20 patients with asthma and GERD disease, esophageal pH was monitored with a pH meter and bronchial responsiveness was evaluated by aerosol inhalation of bradykinin during esophageal acid perfusion and, 24 h earlier or later the patients were submitted to another bronchial provocation test without acid infusion. No significant changes were observed in FEV(1), FEF(25-75%), FVC, or PEF during acid perfusion. The response to the bronchial provocation test did not differ between the control day and the day of acid infusion (p = 0.61). The concentration provoking a 20% fall in FEV(1) (geometric mean +/- geometric SD) was 1.09 +/- 5.84 on the day of acid infusion and 0.98 +/- 5.52 on the control day. There is no evidence that acid infusion changes bronchial responsiveness to bradykinin. These findings strongly question the significance of acid infusion as a model to study the pathogenesis of GERD-induced asthma.

Provocative challenges to help diagnose and monitor asthma: exercise, methacholine, adenosine, and mannitol

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review bronchial provocations tests used in the measurement of bronchial hyperresponsiveness to help in the diagnosis of asthma.

RECENT FINDINGS

The bronchial provocations tests reviewed include exercise, methacholine, AMP and mannitol, with reference to methodology and monitoring of treatment.

SUMMARY

Methacholine is used for identifying bronchial hyperresponsiveness and to guide treatment. Exercise is used as a bronchial provocation test because demonstrating prevention of exercise-induced asthma is an indication for use of a drug. Both of these tests are being used to study tolerance to beta2 agonists. There is increasing use of eucapnic voluntary hyperpnea as a surrogate bronchial provocation test for exercise to identify exercise-induced asthma, particularly in athletes. For methacholine and AMP there is concern about the different breathing patterns used to inhale these aerosols and the impact they have on the cutoff point for identifying bronchial hyperresponsiveness. A new test that uses a kit containing prepacked capsules of different doses of mannitol and a delivery device is discussed. There is increasing interest in using tests that act indirectly by release of mediators because the bronchial hyperresponsiveness itself is an indicator of the presence of inflammation. Since treatment of inflammation leads to loss of bronchial hyperresponsiveness to indirect stimuli, these tests are well suited to identify success of treatment.

Nerve growth factor enhances neurokinin A-induced airway responses and exhaled nitric oxide via a histamine-dependent mechanism

The neurotrophin nerve growth factor (NGF) is elevated in serum and locally in the lung in asthmatics and has been suggested to evoke airway hyperresponsiveness. The aim of this study was to explore mechanisms behind NGF-evoked changes in airway responsiveness. We studied if NGF could evoke increased airway responsiveness to tachykinins, such as neurokinin A (NKA), in a similar way as for histamine and, if so, whether an NGF-evoked increase in NKA airway responsiveness could involve a histamine receptor-dependent mechanism. Contractile responses to cumulative doses of histamine or NKA were studied in guinea-pig tracheal rings in vitro in organ baths. Furthermore, insufflation pressure (IP), pulmonary resistance, lung compliance and exhaled NO (FeNO) were measured in vivo in anaesthetised guinea-pigs challenged with histamine or NKA. NGF pre-treatment in vitro increased the contractile response evoked by histamine, but not by NKA, in tracheal rings. NGF pre-treatment in vivo increased IP, pulmonary resistance and levels of FeNO, and further decreased lung compliance, upon histamine and NKA challenge. The NGF-evoked enhancement of IP, pulmonary resistance, lung compliance as well as FeNO in response to NKA was reversed by the histamine receptor antagonist mepyramine. We suggest that NGF can induce an increase in tachykinin-evoked airway responses and NO formation via a histamine receptor-dependent pathway. This points to an important role for the mast cell in neurotrophin-evoked airway hyperresponsiveness and changes in exhaled NO.

Relationships of methacholine and AMP responsiveness with peak expiratory flow variability in children with asthma

BACKGROUND

Both bronchial responsiveness (BR) and peak expiratory flow (PEF) variability are increased in asthma. PEF variability is presumed to reflect the degree of BR in asthma. BR is commonly assessed by bronchial challenges using direct or indirect stimuli.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare methacholine and adenosine 5'-monophosphate (AMP) responsiveness with regard to their relationships with PEF variability in children with asthma.

METHODS

Methacholine and AMP challenge tests were performed in 79 children with mild to moderate asthma, and a provocative concentration causing a 20% decline in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (PC(20)) was calculated for each challenge. Subjects recorded PEF each morning and each evening for 14 consecutive days. PEF variability was expressed as amplitude percentage mean (amp%mean; high PEF minus low PEF on each day, expressed as a percentage of their mean, averaged over 14 days), and as the lowest percentage highest (low%high; the lowest PEF expressed as a percentage of the highest PEF recorded over the period).

RESULTS

Methacholine PC(20) correlated significantly but weakly with both indices of PEF variability (amp%mean: r=-0.285, P=0.011; low%high: r=0.238, P=0.034). However, there was a significant and strong correlation between AMP PC(20) and both amp%mean (r=-0.583, P=0.000) and low%high (r=0.496, P=0.000). For AMP PC(20), the correlations were stronger than for methacholine PC(20) (comparison of correlation coefficients with amp%mean: P=0.021; with low%high: P=0.063).

CONCLUSION

Both methacholine PC(20) and AMP PC(20) correlated significantly with PEF variability. However, the stronger correlations for AMP PC(20) than for methacholine PC(20) suggest that PEF variability may be better reflected by BR assessed by AMP than by methacholine.

Methacholine and adenosine 5'-monophosphate challenges in preschool children with cough-variant and classic asthma

Bronchial challenge with different stimuli provides different information and may be used as an adjunct to understand the pathophysiology of cough variant asthma (CVA) in young children in whom the mechanism of disease is still unresolved. This study was designed to investigate the hypothesis that airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) to methacholine and adenosine 5'-monophosphate (AMP) is similar in preschool children with CVA and classic asthma. We examined airway response to methacholine and AMP in well-defined 3-6-year-old children with CVA (n = 18), classic persistent asthma (n = 31), and healthy controls (n = 10) by transcutaneous oxygen monitorization. The number of AMP responsive children was significantly lower in the group with CVA (38.9%) than classic persistent asthma (67.7%) (P = 0.049). Mean provocative concentration of AMP causing a 15% fall in transcutaneous oxygen tension (PC15PtcO2 AMP) in children with CVA and classic persistent asthma were 234.58 and 36.35 mg/ml, respectively (P = 0.001). None of the healthy children in the control group responded to AMP. The severity of methacholine responsiveness was found similar in CVA and classic persistent asthma groups (P = 0.738). Although both asthma groups showed a similar pattern in methacholine responsiveness, preschool children with CVA were found to differ from children with classic persistent asthma with regard to response profiles to AMP challenge which may point to different pathophysiologic mechanisms of CVA in the young age group.

Bronchial responsiveness to methacholine and adenosine 5'-monophosphate in young children with asthma: their relationship with blood eosinophils and serum eosinophil cationic protein

BACKGROUND

Bronchial hyperresponsiveness is a characteristic feature of asthma, and is usually measured by bronchial challenges using direct or indirect stimuli. Blood eosinophil numbers and serum levels of eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) are considered as indirect measures of airway inflammation in asthma. The aim of this study was to investigate whether bronchial responsiveness to adenosine 5'-monophosphate (AMP) is more closely associated with blood eosinophil markers, compared with that to methacholine, in young children with asthma.

METHODS

Methacholine and AMP bronchial challenges were performed in 4- to 6-year-old children with asthma (n = 77) and in healthy controls (n = 32), using a modified auscultation method. The end-point was defined as the appearance of wheezing and/or oxygen desaturation. The peripheral blood eosinophil counts and serum ECP concentrations were determined in each subject.

RESULTS

A positive response to methacholine (end-point concentration < or =8mg/ml) and to AMP (end-point concentration < or =200 mg/ml) was observed in 74 (96.1%) and 66 asthmatic children (85.7%), respectively. A majority of controls was unresponsive to both challenges. In the asthma group, there was no significant correlation between methacholine end-point concentration and the eosinophil counts (r = -0.111, P = 0.337) or serum ECP levels (r = -0.126, P = 0.274). In contrast, AMP end-point concentration correlated significantly with the eosinophil counts (r = -0.372, P = 0.001) and with serum ECP levels (r = -0.371, P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that bronchial responsiveness to AMP is more closely related to airway inflammation, compared with that to methacholine, and support the potential usefulness of AMP challenges in detecting inflammatory changes in young children with asthma.

Getting to the heart of asthma: can "beta blockers" be useful to treat asthma?

beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonists are the mainstay for the acute symptomatic treatment of asthma and provide effective bronchoprotection to a wide range of bronchoconstrictor agents. However, over the past 4 decades there has been a continuing debate concerning whether regular chronic treatment with these drugs may be doing more harm than good. The FDA's recent decision to add black box warnings concerning the regular use of salmeterol- and formoterol-containing compounds, as well as their decision not to recommend agents containing long-acting beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonists as first-line therapy, seems to confirm the concerns regarding the regular use of the long-acting beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonists. A similar debate arose in the late 1980s concerning the use of beta-adrenoceptor agonists in the treatment of heart failure. In this disease, short-term use of beta agonists is associated with increased cardiac index and stroke volume, yet their long-term use is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Moreover, certain beta blockers that are initially detrimental when used short term are now considered beneficial in the treatment of this disease when used chronically. Here, there is a parallel, as beta blockers are contraindicated in patients with asthma but the use of beta blockers chronically has never been evaluated. This begs the question of whether a similar paradigm shift is applicable in the treatment of asthma and whether under certain circumstances the long-term use of certain beta blockers may be useful in the treatment of this disease.

Beta2-agonists and bronchial hyperresponsiveness

Bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) is a characteristic feature of asthma, and individuals with this disease respond to a range of physiological and chemical insults that are otherwise innocuous to healthy subjects, suggesting that the mechanisms underlying this phenomenon are characteristic of the asthma phenotype. BHR can be increased following exposure to environmental allergens in suitably sensitized individuals, pollutants, and certain viruses and can also be exacerbated by exposure to certain drugs, including nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents and beta-blockers. Although beta2-agonists administered acutely remain the treatment for the symptoms of asthma, paradoxically, regular treatment with these drugs can result in an increase in BHR, and this has been suggested to contribute to the increase in asthma morbidity and mortality that has been reported by numerous investigators. This article highlights our current understanding of this phenomenon and examines the potential mechanisms responsible for this effect.