Allergen inhalation challenge in smoking compared with non-smoking asthmatic subjects

How does cigarette smoking affect airway remodeling in asthmatics?

Asthma is a prevalent chronic airway inflammatory disease involving multiple cells, and the prolonged course of the disease can cause airway remodeling, resulting in irreversible or partial irreversible airflow limitation and persistent airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) in asthmatics. Therefore, we must ascertain the factors that affect the occurrence and development of airway remodeling in asthmatics. Smokers are not uncommon in asthmatics. However, there is no systematic description of how smoking promotes airway remodeling in asthmatics. This narrative review summarizes the effects of smoking on airway remodeling in asthmatics, and the progress of the methods for evaluating airway remodeling.

Asthma COPD overlap: Insights into cellular and molecular mechanisms

Although there is still no consensus on the definition of Asthma-COPD Overlap (ACO), it is generally accepted that some patients with airway disease have features of both asthma and COPD. Just as its constituents, ACO consists of different phenotypes, possibly depending on the predominance of the underlying asthma or COPD-associated pathophysiological mechanisms. The clinical picture is influenced by the development of airway inflammatory processes either eosinophilic, neutrophilic or mixed, in addition to glandular changes leading to mucus hypersecretion and a variety of other airway structural changes. Although animal models have exposed how smoking-related changes can interact with those observed in asthma, much remains to be known about their interactions in humans and the additional modulating effects of environmental exposures. There is currently no solid evidence to establish the optimal treatment of ACO but it should understandably include an avoidance of environmental triggers such as smoking and relevant allergens. The recognition and targeting of "treatable traits" following phenotyping is a pragmatic approach to select the optimal pharmacological treatment for ACO, although an association of inhaled corticosteroids and bronchodilators is always required in these patients. This association acts both as an anti-inflammatory treatment for the asthma component and as a functional antagonist for the airway remodeling features. Research should be promoted on well phenotyped subgroups of ACO patients to determine their optimal management.

Modelling the asthma phenotype: impact of cigarette smoke exposure

Background

Asthmatics that are exposed to inhaled pollutants such as cigarette smoke (CS) have increased symptom severity. Approximately 25% of adult asthmatics are thought to be active smokers and many sufferers, especially in the third world, are exposed to high levels of inhaled pollutants. The mechanism by which CS or other airborne pollutants alter the disease phenotype and the effectiveness of treatment in asthma is not known. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of CS exposure on the phenotype and treatment sensitivity of rodent models of allergic asthma.

Methods

Models of allergic asthma were configured that mimicked aspects of the asthma phenotype and the effect of CS exposure investigated. In some experiments, treatment with gold standard asthma therapies was investigated and end-points such as airway cellular burden, late asthmatic response (LAR) and airway hyper-Reactivity (AHR) assessed.

Results

CS co-exposure caused an increase in the LAR but interestingly attenuated the AHR. The effectiveness of LABA, LAMA and glucocorticoid treatment on LAR appeared to be retained in the CS-exposed model system. The eosinophilia or lymphocyte burden was not altered by CS co-exposure, nor did CS appear to alter the effectiveness of glucocorticoid treatment. Steroids, however failed to reduce the neutrophilic inflammation in sensitized mice exposed to CS.

Conclusions

These model data have certain parallels with clinical findings in asthmatics, where CS exposure did not impact the anti-inflammatory efficacy of steroids but attenuated AHR and enhanced symptoms such as the bronchospasm associated with the LAR. These model systems may be utilised to investigate how CS and other airborne pollutants impact the asthma phenotype; providing the opportunity to identify novel targets.

Asthma and smoking-induced airway disease without spirometric COPD

Due to the high prevalence rates of cigarette smoking and asthma, current and ex-smokers frequently develop chronic airway disease without spirometric evidence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), either alone or associated with asthma. This review considers the classification, clinical outcomes, inflammatory and imaging variables, phenotypes, and management of current and ex-smokers with airway disease without COPD, focusing on overlaps in those with and without asthma. These individuals have more respiratory symptoms, worse quality of life, increased exacerbation rates, reduced lung function and more comorbidities than never-smokers with asthma or healthy never-smokers. As well as clinical features, airway inflammatory and structural changes in smoking-induced airway disease without COPD overlap with those found in smokers with asthma. Cigarette smoking is associated with worse clinical outcomes in some phenotypes of asthma. Management involves public health measures to control exposure to tobacco smoke, personal advice on smoking cessation and the use of appropriate targeted therapies, although evidence is limited on their effectiveness. Understanding the mechanisms, natural history and management of current and ex-smokers with asthma and smoking-induced airway disease without COPD is a priority for future research.

Randomized trial of allergen-induced asthmatic response in smokers and non-smokers: effects of inhaled corticosteroids

BACKGROUND

It is thought that asthmatics who smoke cigarettes respond less well to inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) therapy than asthmatics who do not smoke.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effects of smoking on allergen-induced airway responses in asthmatics treated with ICS.

METHODS

Randomized, double-blind, crossover study evaluating twice daily fluticasone propionate (FP) 100 μg, FP 500 μg and placebo, for 7 days, on allergen-induced asthmatic responses in 18 non-smoking and 17 smoking atopic asthmatics (NCT01400906). At 1 h post-morning dose on Day 6, forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1 ) was measured up to 10 h post-challenge. Exhaled nitric oxide (eNO), induced sputum cell counts, and responsiveness to methacholine were assessed the following day.

RESULTS

The late asthmatic response (LAR) was suppressed by FP in smokers and non-smokers; with placebo, the LAR was also attenuated in smokers versus non-smokers (adjusted mean minimum change in FEV1 (L) over 4-10 h [95% CI] in non-smokers: placebo -1.01 [1.31, 0.70], FP 100 μg -0.38 [0.54, 0.22], FP 500 μg -0.35 [0.54-0.22]; and in smokers: placebo -0.63 [0.84, 0.43]; FP 100 μg -0.44 [0.65, 0.23]; FP 500 μg -0.46 [0.59-0.32]). The Early AR was suppressed by FP treatment in non-smokers, but was not impacted in smokers. The reduction in methacholine hyperresponsiveness after FP was greater in non-smokers (1.5- and twofold doubling dose difference from placebo after FP 100 μg and FP 500 μg) than smokers (1.0 and 1.3 difference, respectively). Allergen-induced increases in eNO and sputum eosinophils were lower in smokers than non-smokers and were suppressed in both groups by FP.

CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Allergen-induced LARs were of a similar amplitude in both smoking and non-smoking atopic asthmatics at the end of ICS treatment, but attenuation of the LAR in smokers was only partly associated with ICS treatment. The marked attenuation of the LAR observed in smokers in the absence of ICS treatment is a novel observation.

Effects of conventional tobacco smoke and nicotine-free cigarette smoke on airway inflammation, airway remodelling and lung function in a triple allergen model of severe asthma

BACKGROUND

Patients with asthma who smoke have reduced lung function, increased exacerbation rates and increased steroid resistance compared to non-smoking asthmatics. In mice, cigarette smoke has been reported to have both pro- and anti-Th2 response effects.

OBJECTIVE

We hypothesized that combining tobacco cigarette smoke (tCS) with allergen exposure increases inflammation, airway remodelling and lung function in mice. To test this hypothesis, we combined a severe triple allergen model with tCS exposure and investigated whether effects were due to Toll-like receptor 4 signalling and/or nicotine and also observed when nicotine-free cigarettes were used.

METHODS

Mice were sensitized with ovalbumin, cockroach and house dust mite allergen in alum followed by intratracheal challenges with allergen twice a week for 6 weeks or additionally exposed to tCS during the allergen challenge period. Nicotine or nicotine-free herbal cigarette smoke was also applied to allergen challenged mice.

RESULTS

tCS significantly reduced eosinophil numbers, IL-4 and IL-5 concentrations in the lung, total and allergen-specific IgE in serum, improved lung function and reduced collagen I levels. With the exception of collagen I all parameters reduced by tobacco cigarette smoke were also reduced in Toll-like receptor 4-deficient mice. Nicotine-free cigarette smoke also had significant anti-inflammatory effects on eosinophils, IL-4 and IL-5 concentrations in the lung and reduced airway hyperreactivity, albeit weaker than tobacco smoke. Applying nicotine alone also reduced Th2 cytokine levels and eosinophil numbers in the airways.

CONCLUSION

Our experiments show that tCS exposure reduces allergen-induced Th2 response in the lung and associated collagen I production and development of airway hyperreactivity. With the exception on collagen I formation, these effects were not dependent on Toll-like receptor 4. The observed anti-Th2 effects of both nicotine and nicotine-free herbal cigarette smoke together suggests that tCS reduces the Th2 responses through nicotine and other products released by burning tobacco.

Developments in the field of allergy in 2011 through the eyes of Clinical and Experimental Allergy

As in previous years, we felt it would be of value to our readership to summarize the new information provided by the authors who have published in Clinical and Experimental Allergy in 2011 and set this in the context of recent advances in our understanding of the pathogenesis and management of allergic disease in all its many manifestations. In 2011, about 210 articles were published in Clinical and Experimental Allergy including editorials, reviews, opinion articles, guidelines, letters, book reviews and of course at the heart of the journal, papers containing original data. As before, this review is divided into sections based on the way the journal is structured, although this year we have grouped together all the papers dealing with mechanisms of allergic disease, whether they involve patients (clinical mechanisms), pure in vitro studies (basic mechanisms) or animal models (experimental models), as we felt this was a more coherent way to deal with the subject. In the field of asthma and rhinitis, the relationship between airway inflammation and airway dysfunction was of perennial interest to investigators, as were phenotypes and biomarkers. Aspirin hypersensitivity appeared in studies in several papers and there was new interest in asthma in the elderly. The mechanisms involved in allergic disease describe advances in our understanding of T cell responses, the relationship between inflammation and disease, mast cell and basophil activation, steroid resistance and novel therapies. In the section dealing with epidemiology, studies seeking to identify risk factors for allergic disease including vitamin D are prominent, as once again are studies investigating gene-environment interactions. The clinical allergy section focuses on drug allergy, food allergy and immunotherapy. The area of oral immunotherapy for food allergy is well covered and we were grateful to Stephen Durham for guest editing an outstanding special issue on immunotherapy in the centenary year of Leonard Noon's pioneering work. Lastly, in the field of allergens, the interest in component-resolved diagnosis continues to grow and there are also articles describing important novel cultivars and the effect of food processing on the allergenic properties of foods. Another terrific year, full of important and high-quality work,which the journal has been proud to bring to the allergy community.

Methacholine PC20 in African Americans and whites with asthma with homozygous genotypes at ADRB2 codon 16

BACKGROUND

African Americans have worse asthma outcomes compared to whites. Adrenoceptor beta 2, surface gene (ADRB2) Gly16Arg genotypes have been associated with β2-agonist bronchodilator response, asthma exacerbation rate, response to methacholine, and lung function decline but not specifically in African Americans.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to compare the provocative concentration of methacholine that causes a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20) in African Americans and whites with asthma who were ADRB2 homozygous at codon 16 (Arg16Arg or Gly16Gly).

METHODS

African Americans and whites whose parents and grandparents were of the same race, aged ≥10 years, with baseline FEV1 of ≥60% predicted, and no upper or lower respiratory tract infection within the previous 2 weeks meeting genotype criteria were enrolled. PC20 was measured after withholding short-acting and long-acting β2-agonists for 8 and 12 h respectively, montelukast for 24 h, ipratropium bromide and inhaled corticosteroids for 12 h, and antihistamines for 72 h.

RESULTS

423 participants were screened and 88 had a positive challenge. Participants were 32 yrs ± 19 yrs (mean ± SD), 70% female, 51% White (vs. African American), 6% Hispanic. Similar numbers of participants were using inhaled corticosteroids by race and genotype. There were significant differences in log PC20 between race/genotype groups (p = 0.012). African American Arg16Arg participants had a lower log PC20 than White Gly16Gly (p = 0.009) and African American Gly16Gly (p = 0.041) participants. Both race and genotype contributed significantly to the model (p = 0.037 and p = 0.014, respectively) but there was no interaction between race and genotype on log PC20.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Airway hyperresponsiveness is influenced by race and the ADRB2 codon 16 polymorphism. African Americans with the Arg16Arg genotype have increased airway reactivity and may be at risk for worse asthma outcomes. Inclusion of genetic information as an additional clinical tool may aid in the personalization of asthma management decisions. [ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00708227].