Evaluation of six antihistamines in vitro and in patients with urticaria

Efficacy of leukotriene receptor antagonist in chronic urticaria. A double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison of treatment with montelukast and cetirizine in patients with chronic urticaria with intolerance to food additive and/or acetylsalicylic acid

BACKGROUND

The cause and pathogenesis of chronic urticaria are still poorly understood. IgE-independent reactions, are common in adult patients with chronic urticaria, who have daily spontaneous occurrence of weals. H(1)-receptor antagonists (antihistamines) are the major class of therapeutic agents used in the management of urticaria and angioedema. Nevertheless, chronic urticaria is often difficult to treat and may not be controlled by antihistamines alone. It has been postulated that mediators other than histamine, such as kinins, prostaglandin and leukotrienes, may be responsible for some of the symptoms in urticaria which are not controlled by antihistamines. In this study, which was randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled, we compare the clinical efficacy and safety of montelukast (MT) 10 mg given once a day and cetirizine (CET) 10 mg given once a day with placebo (PLA), in the treatment of patients with chronic urticaria who have positive challenge to acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and/or food additives.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A group of 51 patients, ranging in age from 15 to 71 years, with chronic urticaria and positive challenge to food additives and/or ASA, participated in this study for a period of 4 weeks, starting from a 3-day run-in. The assessment of the efficacy was based on scores of daily urticaria symptoms.

RESULTS

MT significantly increased the percentage of symptom-free days for hive and itch. Analysis of frequency distribution of urticaria scores for each symptom gave similar results (MT vs. CET and MT vs. PLA, P < 0.001). The interference with sleep due to their skin condition was also lower in the group treated with MT (P < 0.001). In addition, the median number of days without the rescue medication was significantly higher in the MT group (24 days) than both the CET and the PLA groups (18 days, P < 0.001, and 20 days, P < 0.001, respectively). Finally, a low incidence of adverse events was observed in this study.

CONCLUSION

The results of this comparative study demonstrate that montelukast orally administered once a day is very effective for the treatment of cutaneous symptoms in patients with chronic urticaria due to food additives and/or ASA.

Treatment of urticaria and angioedema: low-sedating H1-type antihistamines

H1-type antihistamines are considered the therapeutic agents of choice for treating urticaria and angioedema. The use of traditional H1 antihistamines is limited by their side effects. In recent years low-sedating H1 antihistamines with reduced sedative and anticholinergic side effects have become popular choices for the treatment of urticaria and angioedema. Terfenadine and astemizole are currently available in the United States, and cetirizine and loratadine, currently under review at the Food and Drug Administration, are available in other countries. Terfenadine, cetirizine, and loratadine achieve rapid peak plasma concentrations in 1 to 2 hours, whereas astemizole has a slow onset of action. In double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of chronic idiopathic urticaria, low-sedating H1 antihistamines were more effective than placebo. The choice of a particular low-sedating H1 antihistamine depends on pharmacokinetic considerations and frequency of administration.

Urticaria: current therapy

Although the ideal treatment for urticaria is identification and removal of its cause, no underlying cause can be discerned in the majority of instances. The chief clinical problem is the treatment of chronic idiopathic urticaria. H1-receptor antagonists are the major class of therapeutic agents used in the management of chronic idiopathic urticaria. The H1 antagonists have been divided into subgroups based on their chemical structure. The second-generation H1 antagonists now available are particularly advantageous for individuals who must remain alert while working. Terbutaline, a beta-adrenergic agonist, is of occasional benefit as an adjunct therapy in combination with an H1 antagonist. The oral administration of disodium cromoglycate is ineffective in patients with chronic idiopathic urticaria, although a few individuals with urticaria caused by food allergy may respond to this drug. It is best to avoid repeated injections of epinephrine and the systemic administration of corticosteroids. Urticaria has a capricious course: it may respond to the administration of placebos or it may resolve spontaneously. About 50% of the patients with urticaria are free of lesions within 1 year, but 20% continue to have episodes for more than 20 years.