Immunomodulation of autoimmunity in MRL/lpr mice with syngeneic bone marrow transplantation (SBMT)

Immune reconstitution therapy (IRT) in multiple sclerosis: the rationale

Immunotherapy of multiple sclerosis (MS) and other neuroimmune diseases is rapidly evolving. For the past 25 years, there has been an accelerating inclusion of new immunomodulating drugs. Based on their molecular construction and their basic mechanism of action, immunotherapeutic agents belong to the following categories: (1) cytotoxic drugs, (2) synthetic immunomodulators, (3) monoclonal antibodies, (4) vaccines (T cell vaccines, antigen vaccines), (5) oral tolerizing agents, (6) modalities that act as indirect immunosuppressants (plasmapheresis, intravenous immunoglobulins [IVIG]), and (7) cellular therapies. MS immunotherapies may also be classified in a different way, into treatments that are given continuously (chronic treatments) and medications that are applied intermittently (IRTs). The principle behind the latter is depletion of the immune system that allows it to rebuild itself. Upon its reconstitution/resetting, the immune system regains the ability to respond to infections and survey the periphery for cancer. An IRT by definition is given at short intermittent courses and not continuously. IRT modalities were shown to induce long-term remission of MS that, in some cases, is close to the definition of a "cure." There are cohorts of patients having been treated with the IRTs, alemtuzumab, and HSCT, who experience-under these modalities-no evidence of disease activity (NEDA) for over 10 years. Most importantly, IRTs cause radical changes in the lymphocyte repertoire after the reconstitution phase that may explain the long-term beneficial effects of IRT and the possibility of re-induction of self-tolerance to self/myelin antigens. In comparison, a chronic treatment cannot result in cure of the autoimmune reactivity, because it only blocks the immune system, as long as it is given; it cannot therefore radically affect the immunopathogenesis of the disease. The risks of adverse events related to immune suppression (such as opportunistic infections and secondary malignancies) with IRTs are lower and front-loaded, whereas the common side effects of chronic immunomodulation are higher and accumulate with time. In conclusion, IRT provides a novel concept for MS therapy with substantial advantages over chronic immunosuppression. IRT therapies have shown a significantly higher level of efficacy in MS. The "Holy grail" of the treatment of autoimmunity, which is to re-induce the disrupted self-tolerance, seems to be achievable-at least in part-with this approach. Moreover, the benefits of IRT, administered in short pulses, include significantly higher adherence to treatment and lower risks for accumulative side effects that are typically associated with chronic immunosuppression.

Regenerating Immunotolerance in Multiple Sclerosis with Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an inflammatory disorder of the central nervous system where evidence implicates an aberrant adaptive immune response in the accrual of neurological disability. The inflammatory phase of the disease responds to immunomodulation to varying degrees of efficacy; however, no therapy has been proven to arrest progression of disability. Recently, more intensive therapies, including immunoablation with autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT), have been offered as a treatment option to retard inflammatory disease, prior to patients becoming irreversibly disabled. Empirical clinical observations support the notion that the immune reconstitution (IR) that occurs following AHSCT is associated with a sustained therapeutic benefit; however, neither the pathogenesis of MS nor the mechanism by which AHSCT results in a therapeutic benefit has been clearly delineated. Although the antigenic target of the aberrant immune response in MS is not defined, accumulated data suggest that IR following AHSCT results in an immunotolerant state through deletion of pathogenic clones by a combination of direct ablation and induction of a lymphopenic state driving replicative senescence and clonal attrition. Restoration of immunoregulation is evidenced by changes in regulatory T cell populations following AHSCT and normalization of genetic signatures of immune homeostasis. Furthermore, some evidence exists that AHSCT may induce a rebooting of thymic function and regeneration of a diversified naïve T cell repertoire equipped to appropriately modulate the immune system in response to future antigenic challenge. In this review, we discuss the immunological mechanisms of IR therapies, focusing on AHSCT, as a means of recalibrating the dysfunctional immune response observed in MS.

[Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in systemic lupus erythematosus]

Although the treatment options for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) have significantly improved over the past years through the introduction of novel targeted biologic therapies, there are still some patients who suffer from refractory and potentially life-threatening courses of the disease. For these patients autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) after immunoablative chemotherapy provides a promising treatment option with curative potential. Based on preclinical models, ASCT was first introduced in 1996 and has since been carried out in approximately 300 patients worldwide. Clinical study results confirmed a disease-free survival in approximately 50 % of patients after 5 years despite termination of immunosuppressive treatment. By careful patient selection and improved anti-infection prophylaxis during stem cell therapy, transplantation-associated mortality could be reduced from an initial 13 % to currently an average of 6 %. Meanwhile, mechanistic studies have provided proof of concept that ASCT not only exerts intensified immunosuppressive effects but is also associated with fundamental qualitative changes of the immune system that may rewire a chronic autoimmune system into a naïve and self-tolerant state: in other words immune reset. Overall, ASCT for SLE is still reserved for patients who do not sufficiently respond to standard therapy. Treatment should be carried out in close cooperation with centers specializing in hematology and only within the framework of clinical studies.

Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and antiphospholipid syndrome: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) has been proposed as a therapeutic option for patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) refractory to standard therapy. This therapeutic approach has been applied to other severe autoimmune diseases refractory to standard therapy with promising results.

AIM

To systematically review the literature and analyze the available evidence on HSCT therapy in patients with SLE and antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), with a focus on therapy efficacy and occurrence of adverse events.

METHODS

A detailed literature search, applied to Ovid MEDLINE, In-Process and Other Non-Indexed Citation and Ovid Medline 1986 to 2014, has been developed a priori to identify articles that reported findings from clinical and laboratory studies that investigated the effect of HCT in patients with SLE.

RESULTS

Twenty-five studies met all inclusion criteria, including a total of 279 SLE patients; of those, 54 patients also fulfilled the classification criteria of APS. The majority of the studies reported an improvement after HSCT in terms of diseases activity control (assessed with SLEDAI, or time-free from diseases) or overall survival. However, one study reported no net benefit of HSCT when compared to immunosuppression alone. One retrospective study reported an overall survival at 5years of 81% in 28 SLE patients. Of note, 5 cases (9.3%) of aPL negativization were reported after HSCT in the APS patients. When combining these studies and analyzing these patients with APS, 32 out of 44 (73%) were able to discontinue anticoagulation after HSCT. Our findings also demonstrate a total of 86 infections in the pool of patients (30.8%), 3 of which resulted in the death of the patient (1.3%). We observed an annual incidence of infection of 11.9% with a mean follow up of 36.2months.

CONCLUSION

Preliminary results of HSCT as a therapeutic option for SLE appear promising. Further studies are warranted in order to assess the safety of the procedure for both the occurrence of secondary autoimmune disease and the rate of infection. However, the rate of adverse effects confines this option to very selected cases of SLE patients resistant or refractory to standard approaches.

Haematopoietic stem cell transplantation in autoimmune diseases: From basic science to clinical practice

Based on animal studies and serendipitous clinical cases, haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) has been used since 1995 as a specific treatment for patients with severe treatment-resistant autoimmune disease (ADs). Despite other clinical developments for autoimmune diseases, including biological therapies, there has been an ongoing requirement for HSCT in some diseases and several thousand procedures have been registered in databases for a wide variety of diseases, predominantly for treatment with autologous HSCT. Currently, the main indications are multiple sclerosis, systemic sclerosis and Crohn's disease, which are supported by large series and randomised controlled trials (RCTs), whereas retrospective registry analyses support benefit in a range of rarer indications. Research into mechanisms of action has provided insight into how tolerance may be achieved with an intensive one-off treatment. In addition to the profound anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive effects provided by the cytotoxic regimen, long-term responses in some diseases may be explained by 'resetting' the immune system through thymic reprocessing and generation of increased T-regulatory cell activity. This review aims to summarise the gradual evolution of HSCT in severe autoimmune diseases over the last 20 years, focussing on the recent publication of clinical and scientific studies, as well as evidence-based guidelines and recommendations.

Treatment of refractory ITP and Evans syndrome by haematopoietic cell transplantation: is it indicated, and for whom?

Several lines of therapy have been established for patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) and Evans syndrome. However, these therapies generally require prolonged administration, lead to profound immunosuppression and increased infectious risk, and are often poorly tolerated. While most patients with these disorders will respond to first-line steroid therapy, others will prove refractory or intolerant to multiple treatments. In these patients (and possibly even selected patients who are not considered refractory), autologous or allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) may provide definitive therapy. We review the literature on the treatment of ITP and Evans syndrome with HCT and discuss its use in the management of these disorders. We also pose, for the purpose of discussion, research questions that will be important to address if HCT is to be considered a viable option for more patients with these diseases.

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in multiple sclerosis

It is widely accepted that the main common pathogenetic pathway in multiple sclerosis (MS) involves an immune-mediated cascade initiated in the peripheral immune system and targeting CNS myelin. Logically, therefore, therapeutic approaches to the disease include modalities aiming at downregulation of the various immune elements that are involved in this immunological cascade. Since the introduction of interferons in 1993, more specific immunoactive drugs have been introduced, but still most of them can, at best, effectively modulate only the early relapsing phases of MS. The more progressed phases of the disease are not efficiently amendable by the existing immunomodulatory drugs. Moreover, localized and compartmentized inflammation in the CNS, which seems to be mostly responsible for the chronic axonal damage and resulting progression of disability, is less affected by the current drugs. A more radical approach to suppress all the inflammation in MS, including that into the CNS, could theoretically be achieved with high-dose immunosuppression using strong cytotoxic medications and resetting of the immune system by hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). HSCT, both allogeneic and autologous, has been tried as a novel therapeutic approach in various autoimmune diseases. During the last 15 years several (mostly open) clinical studies evaluated the effect of HSTC on MS patients; the published papers showed that a high proportion of the HSCT-treated MS patients were stabilized, or even improved after the transplantation and have generally indicated a beneficial effect on disease progression. In this review, the rationale of HSCT and the summary of the results of the existing clinical trials are presented. Despite the fact that it is difficult to collectively summarize the results of all the trials, due to lack of uniformity in the conditioning and treatment protocols and of completed controlled studies, these clinical studies have provided a strong 'proof of concept' for HSCT in MS and have significantly contributed to our understanding of the advantages and disadvantages of each approach and HSCT protocol.

Diminished Th17 (not Th1) responses underlie multiple sclerosis disease abrogation after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

OBJECTIVE

To define changes in phenotype and functional responses of reconstituting T cells in patients with aggressive multiple sclerosis (MS) treated with ablative chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT).

METHODS

Clinical and brain magnetic resonance imaging measures of disease activity were monitored serially in patients participating in the Canadian MS HSCT Study. Reconstitution kinetics of immune-cell subsets were determined by flow cytometry, whereas thymic function was assessed using T-cell receptor excision circle analyses as well as flow cytometry measurements of CD31+ recent thymic emigrants (RTEs). Functional assays were performed to track central nervous system-autoreactive antigen-specific T-cell responses, and the relative capacity to generate Th1, Th17, or Th1/17 T-cell responses.

RESULTS

Complete abrogation of new clinical relapses and new focal inflammatory brain lesions throughout the 2 years of immune monitoring following treatment was associated with sustained decrease in naive T cells, in spite of restoration of both thymic function and release of RTEs during reconstitution. Re-emergence as well as in vivo expansion of autoreactive T cells to multiple myelin targets was evident in all patients studied. The reconstituted myelin-specific T cells exhibited the same Th1 and Th2 responses as preablation myelin-reactive T cells. In contrast, the post-therapy T-cell repertoire exhibited a significantly diminished capacity for Th17 responses.

INTERPRETATION

Our results indicate that diminished Th17 and Th1/17 responses, rather than Th1 responses, are particularly relevant to the abrogation of new relapsing disease activity observed in this cohort of patients with aggressive MS following chemoablation and HSCT.

Haematopoietic SCT in severe autoimmune diseases: updated guidelines of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation

In 1997, the first consensus guidelines for haematopoietic SCT (HSCT) in autoimmune diseases (ADs) were published, while an international coordinated clinical programme was launched. These guidelines provided broad principles for the field over the following decade and were accompanied by comprehensive data collection in the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) AD Registry. Subsequently, retrospective analyses and prospective phase I/II studies generated evidence to support the feasibility, safety and efficacy of HSCT in several types of severe, treatment-resistant ADs, which became the basis for larger-scale phase II and III studies. In parallel, there has also been an era of immense progress in biological therapy in ADs. The aim of this document is to provide revised and updated guidelines for both the current application and future development of HSCT in ADs in relation to the benefits, risks and health economic considerations of other modern treatments. Patient safety considerations are central to guidance on patient selection and HSCT procedural aspects within appropriately experienced and Joint Accreditation Committee of International Society for Cellular Therapy and EBMT accredited centres. A need for prospective interventional and non-interventional studies, where feasible, along with systematic data reporting, in accordance with EBMT policies and procedures, is emphasized.

High-dose chemotherapy and multiple sclerosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Immunomodulatory medications for multiple sclerosis provide only modest control of this potentially debilitating auto-immune disease of the central nervous system. The immunosuppression provided by high-dose chemotherapy has been studied to address treatment-refractory disease. In this review, we discuss the recent significant work in this field and its associated controversies.

RECENT FINDINGS

Conclusive evidence for the efficacy of high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell rescue is lacking given the lack of uniform patient populations and varying treatment protocols. Moreover, the significant toxicity associated with this procedure has dampened enthusiasm for its widespread use. High-dose chemotherapy without stem cell rescue has been trialed as a less toxic approach that eliminates the possibility of re-infusing autoreactive lymphocytes found in the stem cell product.

SUMMARY

Before high-dose chemotherapy with or without stem cell rescue can be adopted for clinical practice, both approaches require testing in randomized clinical trials. Both procedures have the possibility of decreasing disease activity but high-dose chemotherapy without stem cell rescue having a more favorable safety profile, may prove a more significant advance in the field of high-dose therapy for multiple sclerosis.

Reversing the Autoimmune Condition: Experience with Experimental Autoimmune Gastritis

Autoimmune diseases remain a significant health problem in our society, despite the best efforts to understand and treat these conditions. Current clinical treatments are aimed at alleviating the consequences of these diseases, with limited prospects for cure. Our studies with the experimental model of autoimmune gastritis have led us to explore potential curative strategies that can reverse the autoimmune condition. Using mouse models, we have shown that expression of the known gastric autoantigen in the thymus results in immunological tolerance and resistance to the induction of autoimmune gastritis. Also, induced tolerance in donor mice can be transferred to syngeneic recipient mice by bone marrow cells. Strategies based on these observations could lead to reversal of established disease. Transfer of ensuing knowledge to the cure of serious human autoimmune diseases is our ultimate goal.

[Immunoablation followed by autologous stem cell transplantation in lupus: a clinical update]

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a classic systemic autoimmune disease. Standard treatment consists of chronic therapy with antimalarials, glucocorticoids and immunosuppressive/cytotoxic drugs, which is associated with considerable side effects. In contrast, immunoablation of autoreactive immunologic memory followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) has been the only regimen capable of inducing long-term remission of up to 10 years after cessation of immunosuppressive therapy, even in severely affected patients. Introduced in 1996, the procedure has since been performed in 147 patients with severe SLE refractory to standard treatment in clinical studies worldwide. Most of these patients achieved clinical long-term remission. However, SLE relapses and secondary autoimmune disorders have been reported. Transplant-related mortality occurred in 6% of the 147 cases, with a wide center effect (2-13%). Here we summarise the results published in the literature on immunoablation followed by ASCT in SLE and discuss future perspectives for optimising this therapeutic approach. It may be possible to improve the outcome and reduce the risks of treatment by identifying patients with a poor prognosis at an early stage, before irreversible organ damage has taken place.

The potential use of stem cells in multiple sclerosis: an overview of the preclinical experience

The reported neurodegeneration process in multiple sclerosis may explain the lack of efficacy of the currently used immunomodulating modalities and the irreversible axonal damage, which results in accumulating disability. Efforts for neuroprotective treatments have not been, so far, successful in clinical studies in other CNS diseases. Therefore, for MS, the use of stem cells may provide a logical solution, since these cells can migrate locally into the areas of white matter lesions (plaques) and have the potential to support local neurogenesis and rebuilding of the affected myelin. This may be achieved both by support of the resident CNS stem cells repertoire and by differentiation of the transplanted cells into neurons and myelin-producing cells (oligodendrocytes). Stem cells were also shown to possess immunomodulating properties, inducing systemic and local suppression of the myelin-targeting autoimmune lymphocytes. Several types of stem cells (embryonic and adult) have been described and extensively studied in animal models of CNS diseases. In this review, we summarize the experience with the use of different types of stem cells in the animal models of MS (EAE) and we describe the advantages and disadvantages of each stem cell type for future clinical applications in MS.

Use of stem cells for the treatment of multiple sclerosis

The reported evidence of neurodegeneration in multiple sclerosis (MS) may explain the lack of efficacy of the currently used immunomodulating modalities and the irreversible axonal damage, which results in accumulating disability. To date, efforts for neuroprotective treatments have not been successful in clinical studies in other CNS diseases. Therefore, for MS, the use of stem cells may provide a logical solution, since these cells can migrate locally into the areas of white-matter lesions (plaques) and have the potential to support local neurogenesis and rebuilding of the affected myelin. This is achieved both by support of the resident CNS stem cell repertoire and by differentiation of the transplanted cells into neurons and myelin-producing cells (oligodendrocytes). Stem cells were also shown to possess immunomodulating properties, inducing systemic and local suppression of the myelin-targeting autoimmune lymphocytes. Several types of stem cells (embryonic and adult) have been described and extensively studied in animal models of CNS diseases and the various models of MS (experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis [EAE]). In this review, we summarize the experience with the use of different types of stem cells in CNS disease models, focusing on the models of EAE and describe the advantages and disadvantages of each stem cell type for future clinical applications in MS.

Induction of tolerance to self-antigens using genetically modified bone marrow cells

The challenge of finding a lasting cure for autoimmune disease(s) has not been met. Although the use of systemic anti-inflammatory agents still dominates the treatment of these diseases, there is a push towards developing novel and more specific strategies. In addressing autoimmunity, there is the intrinsic need to understand the mechanisms that lead to the development and maintenance of immunological tolerance to self-antigens. Experimental evidence has shown that directed antigen expression in the thymus can induce immunological tolerance to that antigen. This forms the cornerstone of one strategy directed towards the cure of autoimmunity. In this strategy, individuals with autoimmune disease are transplanted with bone marrow stem cells that have been genetically modified and in this way allow expression of the self-antigen in the thymus.

Preclinical experiments

The clinical use of autologous stem cell transplants for the treatment of refractory severe autoimmune diseases was preceded by convincing proof of its underlying principle in animal models. The various categories of experimental autoimmune disease in laboratory rodents are briefly described here, and the rationale that was used in the selection of suitable experimental autoimmune diseases for translational research is explained. The two models that provided the bulk of the data needed for designing the initial clinical treatment protocols were adjuvant arthritis (AA) and experimental allergic encephalomyelitis (EAE), which were both induced in Buffalo rats. In this strain, AA is manifested as a chronic, progressive, systemic polyarthritis and EAE as a chronic, remitting/relapsing form of encephalomyelitis resembling multiple sclerosis. Both diseases can be cured with autologous stem cell transplantation provided that adequate conditioning is given and that the disease has not yet progressed to the stage of 'scarring'. It is basically the inflammatory stages that respond well to this therapy. The success of treatment depends on how completely the autoantigen-specific activated T-lymphocytes and memory cells are eradicated. Because of a lack of information on the nature of the autoantigens involved in human disease and on the size of those cell populations in the animal models as well as in humans, this aspect of translation is difficult. The experiments have, however, provided important guidelines. High-dose conditioning regimens yield better results than low-dose conditioning, certain conditioning agents perform better than others, and care should be taken not to reintroduce too many T-cells with the autologous graft. The clinical results obtained so far indicate a high predictive power of these two animal models, which are therefore recommended strongly for additional preclinical studies.

Induction of tolerance in autoimmune diseases by hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: getting closer to a cure?

Hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) are the earliest cells of the immune system, giving rise to B and T lymphocytes, monocytes, tissue macrophages, and dendritic cells. In animal models, adoptive transfer of HSCs, depending on circumstances, may cause, prevent, or cure autoimmune diseases. Clinical trials have reported early remission of otherwise refractory autoimmune disorders after either autologous or allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). By percentage of transplantations performed, autoimmune diseases are the most rapidly expanding indication for stem cell transplantation. Although numerous editorials or commentaries have been previously published, no prior review has focused on the immunology of transplantation tolerance or development of phase 3 autoimmune HSCT trials. Results from current trials suggest that mobilization of HSCs, conditioning regimen, eligibility and exclusion criteria, toxicity, outcome, source of stem cells, and posttransplantation follow-up need to be disease specific. HSCT-induced remission of an autoimmune disease allows for a prospective analysis of events involved in immune tolerance not available in cross-sectional studies.

Osteoporosis in murine systemic lupus erythematosus--a laboratory model

The aim of this study was to assess the skeletal metabolism in a murine model of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). MRL/n and MRL/l mice (respectively representing a benign and a malignant form of the disease) were observed from 1.5 to 6.5 months of life. The monthly follow-up included: biochemical and histomorphometrical studies of the femoral bone, serum biochemistry, immunoglobulins and osteocalcin, and histological evaluation of the kidney tissue. The results showed a higher femoral weight (+11.5%), calcium (+4.4%) and protein bone content (+11.4%) and a significantly higher (+77%) phosphorus bone content in the MRL/n group; significantly lower (-48.9%) bone alkaline phosphatase enzymatic activity, lower bone alkaline/acid phosphatase enzymatic activities ratio (-40.8%) and lower (-38.4%) serum osteocalcin values in the MRL/l group (which might suggest reduced bone formation in these animals); markedly smaller trabecular bone volume (BV/TV) in the femoral head (-36.2%) and femoral neck (-39.8%), and smaller cortical and femoral areas in the mid-femoral shaft (-38.8% and -38.1% respectively) in the MRL/l group; higher serum immunoglobulins, increased serum blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and creatinine and a higher index of activity in the kidney histology in the MRL/l group, indicating increased activity of the disease in this substrain. The MRL mice, through their two substrains, may serve as a valuable laboratory animal model for study of the skeletal changes in SLE and of the influence of the disease activity on the skeletal metabolism.

Stem cells in the aetiopathogenesis and therapy of rheumatic disease

Animal models of autoimmune disease and case reports of patients with these diseases who have been involved in bone marrow transplants have provided important data implicating the haemopoietic stem cell in rheumatic disease pathogenesis. Animal and human examples exist for both cure and transfer of rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and other organ-specific diseases using allogeneic haemopoietic stem cell transplantation. This would suggest that the stem cell in these diseases is abnormal and could be cured by replacement of a normal stem cell although more in vitro data are required in this area. Given the morbidity and increased mortality in some patients with severe autoimmune diseases and the increasing safety of autologous haemopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), pilot studies have been conducted using HSCT in rheumatic diseases. It is still unclear whether an autologous graft will cure these diseases but significant remissions have been obtained which have provided important data for the design of randomized trials of HSCT versus more conventional therapy. Several trials are now open to accrual under the auspices of the European Bone Marrow Transplant Group/European League Against Rheumatism (EBMT/EULAR) registry. Future clinical and laboratory research will need to document the abnormalities of the stem cell of a rheumatic patient because new therapies based on gene therapy or stem cell differentiation could be apllied to these diseases. With increasing safety of allogeneic HSCT it is not unreasonable to predict cure of some rheumatic diseases in the near future.

Cyclophosphamide for the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus

Aggressive immunosuppressive therapy with cyclophosphamide has improved the outcome of major organ disease in lupus patients. Controlled trials have shown that pulse cyclophosphamide is the treatment of choice for patients with moderate to severe proliferative nephritis. Long-term follow-up of patients participating in these controlled trials suggests that combining pulse cyclophoshamide with pulse methylprednisolone increases efficacy but not toxicity. Retrospective case series have also shown that pulse cyclophosphamide therapy may be effective for the management of severe or refractory to standard therapy neuropsychiatric, pulmonary, cardiovascular and hematologic disease. Pulse cyclophosphamide is associated with an increased risk for herpes zoster infections in the short term and with sustained amenorrhea in the long-term. Recent studies have also drawn attention to the lack of response (or incomplete response) and flare of lupus after an initial response. In an effort to circumvent these limitations, current investigations explore the therapeutic potential of high-dose, immunoablative cyclophosphamide therapy or low-dose cyclophosphamide in combination with nucleoside analogs or biologic response modifiers.

Treatment of severe systemic lupus erythematosus with high-dose chemotherapy and haemopoietic stem-cell transplantation: a phase I study

BACKGROUND

Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) who experience persistent multiorgan dysfunction, despite standard doses of intravenous cyclophosphamide, represent a subset of patients at high risk of early death. We investigated the safety and efficacy of immune suppression and autologous haemopoietic stem-cell infusion to treat such patients.

METHODS

From 1996, we selected patients with persistent SLE despite use of cyclophosphamide. Patients underwent dose-intense immune suppression and autologous haemopoietic stem-cell (CD34) infusion. Peripheral blood lymphocytes were analysed by flow cytometry, ELISA, and T-cell-receptor spectratyping before and after transplantation. We mobilised autologous haemopoietic stem cells with 2.0 g/m2 cyclophosphamide and 10 microg/kg granulocyte colony stimulating factor daily, enriched with CD34-positive selection, and reinfused after immunosuppression with 200 mg/kg cyclophosphamide, 1 g methylprednisolone, and 90 mg/kg equine antithymocyte globulin.

RESULTS

Nine patients underwent stem-cell mobilisation but two were excluded before transplantation because of infection. The remaining seven received high-dose chemotherapy and stem-cell infusion. Median time to an absolute neutrophil count higher than 0.5x10(9)/L and nontransfused platelet count higher than 20x10(9)/L was 9 days (range 8-11) and 11 days (10-13), respectively. At a median follow-up of 25 months (12-40), all patients were free from signs of active lupus. Renal, cardiac, pulmonary, and serological markers, and T cell phenotype and repertoire had normalised.

INTERPRETATION

Patients remained free from active lupus and improved continuously after transplantation, with no immunosuppressive medication or small residual doses of prednisone. T-cell repertoire diversity and responsiveness was restored. Durability of remission remains to be established.

Intense immune suppression for systemic lupus--the role of hematopoietic stem cells

The treatment of severe autoimmune diseases has been recently revitalized by the introduction of intense immune suppression with immune ablative intent followed by three different procedures. These are allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), autologous HSCT (using either marrow or peripheral blood), and intense immune suppression without stem cell support. Current trials suggest that high dose immune suppressive therapy with or without autologous hematopoietic stem cell support can induce remission of previously refractory disease. Follow-up is too brief to determine if intense immune suppression, and more specifically autologous HSCT, will ultimately cure SLE. It is conceivable that an allogeneic source of stem cells from a normal donor (e.g. HLA matched sibling) will be required to achieve a cure. It is also possible that autologous HSCT, even if not curative, may prolong the life of patients with otherwise high-risk features. In carefully selected patients, the potential benefits of this procedure may outweigh the risks.

Acute/relapsing experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis: induction of long lasting, antigen-specific tolerance by syngeneic bone marrow transplantation

Experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) is an inducible autoimmune disease widely used as a model of the acute/relapsing stage of multiple sclerosis. We have previously shown that treatment of EAE-mice with high doses of cyclophosphamide (CY) (350 mg kg), followed by syngeneic bone marrow transplantation (SBMT), completely abrogates the clinical paralytic signs and even prevents the appearance of new relapses in the chronic-relapsing model of the disease. In the present study we examined whether this treatment protocol induces long term tolerance and whether this tolerance is antigen-specific. EAE was induced by immunization with spinal cord homogenate (MSCH) in complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA). The treatment with CY and SBMT was performed on day 6 post immunization. Treated and untreated mice were rechallenged with MSCH, or a non-relevant antigen (OVA) in CFA at various stages after the first paralytic attack. In contrast to previous data showing that animals recovering from acute EAE are usually refractory to re-induction of the disease, repeated injections of MSCH at different sites from the initial immunization, followed by i.v. injection of inactivated Bordetella bacteria, 2, 4 and 6 months after the initial EAE-induction, caused a severe and usually lethal relapse in all the untreated, control animals. Mice treated with CY and SBMT were resistant to all rechallenges with the same encephalitogenic inoculum. Following the second rechallenge, peripheral lymph node cells were examined in vitro for their proliferative responses to myelin antigens or to OVA. Lymphocytes obtained from CY+SBMT treated mice did not proliferate in vitro in response to myelin basic protein (MBP), but proliferated against OVA, when immunized with this antigen, after SBMT. Adoptive transfer of lymphocytes from tolerant mice to naive recipients did not transfer resistance to EAE-induction. Our results indicate that high doses of CY, followed by SBMT, induce long term antigen-specific tolerance presumably by a mechanism of clonal deletion or anergy.

A New Strategy for Treatment of Autoimmune Diseases in Chimeric Resistant MRL/lpr Mice

A new strategy for the treatment of autoimmune diseases in chimeric resistant MRL/lpr mice is established. The strategy includes injection of cyclophosphamide (CY), fractionated irradiation (5 Gy × 2), bone grafts (to recruit stromal cells), and two transplantations of whole bone marrow cells (WBMCs) from allogeneic normal C57BL/6 mice (CY/2X/Bone/2BMT). MRL/lpr mice, thus treated, survived more than 40 weeks (1 mouse survived for >40 weeks, 7 for >50 weeks, and 4 for >60 weeks after these treatments). Immunohistological studies showed that the mice were completely free from both lymphadenopathy and autoimmune diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosis and rheumatoid arthritis. The levels of autoantibodies (IgM/IgG rheumatoid factors and IgM/IgG anti-ssDNA antibodies [Abs]) in the treated mice decreased to those in the normal mice. In addition, successful cooperation among T cells, B cells, and antigen-presenting cells (APCs) was observed. Abnormal T cells with immunophenotypes of B220+/Thy-1+/CD3+/CD4−/CD8−present in untreated MRL/lpr mice disappeared, and the hematolymphoid cells of the treated mice were of donor origin. However, the mice that had been irradiated with 8.5 Gy and then reconstituted with T-cell–depleted BMCs plus bone grafts died within 2 weeks due to the side effect of irradiation. The depletion of CD8+ cells (not CD4+ cells) from WBMCs resulted in graft failure; 60% of the recipient mice, thus treated, died within 2 weeks, and all recipients died by 15 weeks. Furthermore, limiting dilution assays showed that approximately more than 0.5% of T cells contained in the BMCs are necessary not only for engraftment of BMCs but also for long-term disease-free survival of the recipients. In contrast, recipients that had received CD4-depleted BMCs with CY plus fractionated irradiation (5Gy × 2) survived for more than 40 weeks without showing graft-versus-host reaction (GVHR). This indicates that CD8+cells in the BMCs are essential for the successful engraftment of the donor-type hematolymphoid cells.

A New Strategy for Treatment of Autoimmune Diseases in Chimeric Resistant MRL/lpr Mice

A new strategy for the treatment of autoimmune diseases in chimeric resistant MRL/lpr mice is established. The strategy includes injection of cyclophosphamide (CY), fractionated irradiation (5 Gy × 2), bone grafts (to recruit stromal cells), and two transplantations of whole bone marrow cells (WBMCs) from allogeneic normal C57BL/6 mice (CY/2X/Bone/2BMT). MRL/lpr mice, thus treated, survived more than 40 weeks (1 mouse survived for >40 weeks, 7 for >50 weeks, and 4 for >60 weeks after these treatments). Immunohistological studies showed that the mice were completely free from both lymphadenopathy and autoimmune diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosis and rheumatoid arthritis. The levels of autoantibodies (IgM/IgG rheumatoid factors and IgM/IgG anti-ssDNA antibodies [Abs]) in the treated mice decreased to those in the normal mice. In addition, successful cooperation among T cells, B cells, and antigen-presenting cells (APCs) was observed. Abnormal T cells with immunophenotypes of B220+/Thy-1+/CD3+/CD4−/CD8−present in untreated MRL/lpr mice disappeared, and the hematolymphoid cells of the treated mice were of donor origin. However, the mice that had been irradiated with 8.5 Gy and then reconstituted with T-cell–depleted BMCs plus bone grafts died within 2 weeks due to the side effect of irradiation. The depletion of CD8+ cells (not CD4+ cells) from WBMCs resulted in graft failure; 60% of the recipient mice, thus treated, died within 2 weeks, and all recipients died by 15 weeks. Furthermore, limiting dilution assays showed that approximately more than 0.5% of T cells contained in the BMCs are necessary not only for engraftment of BMCs but also for long-term disease-free survival of the recipients. In contrast, recipients that had received CD4-depleted BMCs with CY plus fractionated irradiation (5Gy × 2) survived for more than 40 weeks without showing graft-versus-host reaction (GVHR). This indicates that CD8+cells in the BMCs are essential for the successful engraftment of the donor-type hematolymphoid cells.