Potential uses of human pancreatic growth hormone-releasing factor 1-44 amide

Prolactin response to growth hormone-releasing hormone during chronic thyrotropin-releasing hormone infusion in the treatment of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

In six patients suffering from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis we evaluated changes of T4, T3, TSH, PRL, and GH during treatment by continuous iv infusion of TRH for at least 15 days. No clinical improvement was detected. A significant rise of thyroid hormone levels was observed, as well as an upward trend of basal TSH levels and no change of basal PRL and GH levels. TRH acute test-induced TSH and PRL responses became blunted. Treatment provoked also the onset of a responsiveness of PRL to GHRH. The reduced TSH and PRL responses to acute TRH test during treatment could be explained by a down-regulation of TRH pituitary receptors. On the contrary, the onset of PRL responsiveness to GHRH is at present without a satisfactory explanation.

Comparison of growth hormone releasing hormone therapy and growth hormone therapy in growth hormone deficiency

Seven children with growth hormone deficiency of hypothalamic origin responded to an i.v. bolus of growth hormone releasing hormone (GHRH) (1-29)-NH2 with a mean serum increase of 10.7 ng/ml growth hormone (GH) (range 2.5-29.3 ng/ml). Continuous s.c. administration of GHRH of 4-6 micrograms/kg twice daily for at least 6 months did not improve the growth rate in five of the patients. One patient increased his growth rate from 1.9 to 3.8 cm/year and another from 3.5 to 8.2 cm/year; however, the growth rate of the latter patient then decreased to 5.4 cm/year. When treatment was changed to recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) in a dose of 2 U/m2 daily, given s.c. at bedtime, the growth rate improved in all patients to a mean of 8.5 cm/year (range: 6.2 to 14.6). Presently GHRH cannot be recommended for the routine therapy of children with growth hormone deficiency since a single daily dose of rhGH produced catch-up growth which GHRH therapy did not.

The effect of mazindol on growth hormone secretion in boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy

Mazindol has been reported to improve muscle function in Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) by virtue of its growth hormone (GH) suppression. The effects were studied on GH secretion (in response to growth hormone releasing factor and sleep) of mazindol 2 mg daily for 3 months in five boys with DMD. No consistent change was found following mazindol therapy. Adverse effects were noted in all the boys which may preclude long term use of mazindol in DMD.

Growth hormone responses to hp GRF 1-44 amide, bromocriptine and stress in acromegaly are correlated

The results of testing growth hormone (GH) reserve using human pancreatic growth hormone-releasing factor 1-44 amide (hp GRF 1-44 amide) have been compared with the GH responses in a variety of other dynamic tests in seven acromegalic patients. The GH release following hp GRF 1-44 amide correlated with the GH suppression following bromocriptine, but showed an inverse correlation with the GH release following stress tests (insulin-induced hypoglycaemia/glucagon). There was no correlation between the GH responses in these three tests and any of the other tests: TRH, GnRH and glucose. A hypothesis is proposed to explain these findings on the basis of varying degrees of GH secretion from adenomatous and normal pituitary somatotrophs in acromegaly.

The GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) test in acromegaly before and after adenomectomy

The GHRH test may represent a new tool in the study of GH dynamics in acromegaly. GH responsiveness to GHRH 1-40 (50 micrograms iv) has been studied in 21 acromegalic patients. Nineteen out of 21 had active disease. Five patients were also studied 1-12 months after neurosurgery. Two apparently cured acromegalics were studied 1-2 yr after surgery. GH secretion has been evaluated in all patients by means of TRH, bromocriptine and insulin hypoglycemia tests, too. GH response to GHRH has also been performed in 14 normal subjects. In acromegaly, GH responses after GHRH (p less than 0.01 vs placebo) were variable. The GH peak ranged from 8 to 445 ng/ml in patients with active disease. Maximum GH increase after GHRH (calculated as peak/basal value ratio) was significantly reduced in acromegaly (2.9 +/- 0.5 ng/ml; mean +/- SE) in comparison to controls (34.1 +/- 10.9 ng/ml; p less than 0.01). No significant differences in GH pattern after GHRH were found between untreated and previously treated patients with active disease. A significant correlation was found between GH basal levels and GH incremental area (p less than 0.05) and between GH basal and peak levels (p less than 0.01) after GHRH. A significant increase in PRL secretion was observed in acromegalic patients after GHRH (p less than 0.01 vs placebo). No discernable variation was found in the other pituitary hormones pattern after the peptide administration. A positive correlation was observed between GH increase after GHRH and insulin hypoglycemia (p less than 0.01).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Plasma growth hormone (GH) responses to growth hormone releasing factor (hp GRF 1-44) in familial GH deficiency

In four children with familial GH deficiency peak and integrated GH responses to an acute intravenous bolus of hp GRF 1-44 were lower than in 18 children with non-familial idiopathic GH deficiency and in 5 children with structural hypothalamic abnormalities. It is possible that the familial forms of GH deficiency described may be due to absence or biological inactivity of endogenous GRF or possibly GRF receptor or post receptor abnormalities.

Growth hormone releasing hormone

Human growth hormone releasing hormone (GHRH) was originally extracted from two pancreatic tumours in patients with acromegaly, and is now known to consist of a 44 residue amidated peptide or its C-terminal-shortened derivatives. The sequence of rat GHRH has also been determined; this 43 residue peptide shows approximately 70% homology with human GHRH, and is located mainly in the arcuate nucleus of the hypothalamus. Pulsatile GH release in the rat is principally a consequence of the pulsatile release of hypothalamic GHRH, although this appears to be associated with a transient suppression of somatostatin release. Exogenous GHRH specifically increases circulating GH in many species, and in the long term may increase growth. In normal man, several analogues of GHRH have been shown to be safe, sensitive and specific stimuli to GH release; although there may be a variable prolactin response, this is usually of small magnitude. Continuous infusion of GHRH leads to a decrement in responsiveness, due at least in part to changes in hypothalamic somatostatin. The GH response to GHRH is also modulated by obesity, blood sugar, free fatty acids, and GH itself. Many children with 'GH deficiency' (idiopathic, radiation-induced, or secondary to hypothalamopituitary tumours) respond to intravenous GHRH with an acute rise in serum GH. Early studies also indicate that long-term therapy with subcutaneous GHRH may increase growth velocity in some of these children. It is concluded that analogues of GHRH are useful in the investigation of the hypothalamopituitary axis, and may be important in the therapy of short stature.

Impaired growth hormone response to growth hormone releasing factor and insulin-hypoglycaemia in obesity

We have previously reported an impaired growth hormone (GH) response and abnormal prolactin release to insulin-hypoglycaemia in obesity. We suggested that obese women with an absent prolactin response to hypoglycaemia ('non-responders') have a disorder of hypothalamic function. We have now investigated the GH response to i.v. growth hormone releasing factor, GHRF (1-29)NH2, in 14 obese women and nine age-matched normal-weight women. We found a significantly reduced GH response to GHRF in the obese women as compared with controls (mean peak +/- SEM: obese 8.9 +/- 2 mu/l, controls 28 +/- 2 mu/l; P less than 0.01). When the obese women were divided on the basis of their prolactin response to insulin-hypoglycaemia (seven 'non-responders', mean weight 102 +/- 5 kg; seven responders, mean weight 108 +/- 8 kg) a similar GH response to GHRF was found between the two groups but the GH response to hypoglycaemia was significantly less in the 'non-responder' women (mean peak 'non-responders' 10.5 +/- 3 mu/l, responders 27 +/- 4 mu/l; P less than 0.05). We conclude that obesity may be characterized by an impaired GH response to both i.v. GHRF and insulin-hypoglycaemia, which suggests altered hypothalamic-pituitary function. The finding that the GH response to hypoglycaemia is significantly less in the obese prolactin 'non-responder' women supports the hypothesis for a hypothalamic disorder.