Effects of treatment with oestradiol/levonorgestrel on bone, lipoproteins and hormone status in postmenopausal women

The effect of oral contraceptives on orthodontic tooth movement in rat

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of ethinyl estradiol/norgestrel - used in some oral contraceptives- on orthodontic tooth movement in Wistar rats.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Forty eight female three-month old Wistar rats with an average weight of 250 ± 25 gr were divided into two experimental and control groups. One week prior to appliance insertion and during the appliance therapy period, 100 mcg/kg/day of ethinyl estradiol and 1 mg/kg/days of norgestrel were administered to the experimental group by gavage; meanwhile the control group received an equivalent volume of Sodium Chloride 0.9 % (Saline). Maxillary central incisors were tipped distally by insertion of springs exerting 30 g force. Two, seven and fourteen days after spring insertion animals were sacrificed. The mesioincisal distance between maxillary incisors were measured. Subsequently, histological sections were prepared for histomorphometric studies.

RESULTS

14 days after force application the orthodontic tooth movement was significantly lower in the experimental group (p<0.05). The number of osteoclasts were significantly lower in the experimental group 2, 7 and 14 days after spring insertion (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Ethinyl estradiol/norgestrel (oral contraceptives) can significantly decrease the amount of tooth movement in the linear phase.

Why consider vaginal drug administration?

OBJECTIVE

To review the anatomy and physiology of the vagina, the merits of vaginal drug administration, and the currently available vaginal drug-administration systems.

DESIGN

Review of basic and clinical research.

RESULT(S)

Although clinicians commonly use topically administered drugs in the vagina, this route for systemic drug administration is somewhat novel. Experience with a variety of products demonstrates that the vagina is a highly effective site for drug delivery, particularly in women's health. The vagina is often an ideal route for drug administration because it allows for the administration of lower doses, steady drug levels, and less frequent administration than the oral route. With vaginal drug administration, absorption is unaffected by gastrointestinal disturbances, there is no first-pass effect, and use is discreet. Knowledge of anatomy, physiology, histology, and immunology of the vagina should allow clinicians to reassure their patients concerning this mode of delivery. Greater understanding and experience by clinicians should lead to increased use and acceptance of the vagina as a route for drug administration.

CONCLUSION(S)

The safety and efficacy of vaginal administration have been well established. The vaginal route of drug delivery is acceptable and may even be a preferable route of administration for many drugs, particularly hormones, whether for contraception or postmenopausal estrogen therapy.

Efficacy of a new 7-day transdermal sequential estradiol/levonorgestrel patch in women

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the efficacy and tolerability of a new 7-day transdermal sequential estradiol/levonorgestrel patch (Fem7 Combi; Merck KGaA; Germany), versus placebo, as hormone replacement therapy in menopausal women.

METHODS

A multicentre, randomized, clinical study consisting of a 3-week screening phase, a 12-week double-blind, placebo-controlled treatment phase, and a 12-week open, follow-up phase. Women aged 40-65 years with an intact uterus and menopausal complaints were randomized to either 2 weeks of an estradiol mono patch (50 microg per 24 h) followed by 2 weeks of an estradiol/levonorgestrel combination patch (50 microg/10 microg per 24 h), or a placebo patch, for three 28-day cycles. Changes in the Kupperman Index and the frequency of hot flushes were assessed.

RESULTS

The sequential use of a 7-day estradiol patch and a 7-day estradiol/levonorgestrel patch was superior to placebo in reducing menopausal symptoms, and was well tolerated. At the end of the treatment phase, there was a statistically significant reduction in the Kupperman Index score versus placebo (P<0.0001), and a statistically significant difference between groups in the proportion of patients with a reduction in the number of hot flushes (at least 50% versus baseline). During the open follow-up phase, there was a marked reduction in the Kupperman Index score and the number of hot flushes for patients switched from placebo to active study medication. The active medication was effective throughout the 1-week application period.

CONCLUSIONS

The new 7-day transdermal sequential estradiol/levonorgestrel patch was well tolerated, providing rapid and effective relief of menopausal symptoms. The addition of low-dose levonorgestrel did not influence the beneficial effects of estradiol.

Efficacy and tolerability of a new 7-day transdermal estradiol patch versus placebo in hysterectomized women with postmenopausal complaints

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the efficacy and tolerability of a continuously applied 7-day-Estradiol patch (Fem7, Merck KGaA, Germany) delivering 50 microg estradiol per day in the treatment of hysterectomized women with postmenopausal complaints compared with placebo.

DESIGN

A multicentre, randomized, double-blind study with an initial screening phase (phase I), a 3-month double-blind placebo-controlled phase (phase II) and a 3-month open follow-up phase (phase III).

METHODS

186 patients were randomized for a 3-cycle placebo-controlled study followed by a 3-cycle open follow-up (total duration; 6 months). The changes in Kupperman Index (primary efficacy variable), hot flushes and urogenital symptom score were studied from baseline to the end of the study. In addition, skin tolerability was assessed and patients were also asked to grade the subjective acceptance of therapy.

RESULTS

A reduction in Kupperman Index was observed in both groups, and at each cycle of the placebo-controlled treatment phase the 7-day-Estradiol patch was superior compared with placebo (last value vs. baseline P = 0.0006). From the second treatment week onwards a distinct difference was noted in the reduction of hot flushes from baseline between the 7-day-Estradiol patch group and the placebo group. The difference between the groups was statistically significant for each cycle and at the end of the controlled treatment phase (mean weekly hot flush reduction at the end of the placebo-controlled treatment phase: -32.5 for the 7-day-Estradiol patch vs. -22.0 for placebo, P = 0.0025). The efficacy of the 7-day-Estradiol patch within the application period did not show any difference between days 1-3 and 4-7. Subjective acceptance of the 7-day-Estradiol patch was good and 72.4% of patients who took active medication throughout the study were willing to consider continuing its use.

CONCLUSIONS

The 7-day-Estradiol patch is well tolerated and provides effective relief of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms in hysterectomized women, with a rapid onset of action and 7-day duration of therapeutic effect. Although a placebo effect was observed, the 7-day-Estradiol patch significantly reduced hot flushes and other menopausal symptoms throughout the application period.

Patient acceptability of and tolerance to a placebo intravaginal ring in hysterectomized women: a pilot study

OBJECTIVE

To assess the tolerance to and patient acceptability of a placebo intravaginal ring in hysterectomized, postmenopausal women over a 28-day period.

DESIGN

Open, single-center.

SETTING

University hospital specialist menopause clinic.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 24 healthy postmenopausal women attending menopause clinics at King's College Hospital and the Amarant Centre, London.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Discomfort, ring expulsions, bowel, urinary and sexual difficulties associated with the ring and women's overall views on this method.

RESULTS

The major problems with use of the intravaginal ring were patient discomfort, involuntary ring expulsion and sexual partner discomfort. These were experienced by 13, 11 and seven women and their partners, respectively, and resulted in premature discontinuation by three women who suffered discomfort and two women who experienced recurrent involuntary ring expulsion.

CONCLUSIONS

Two-thirds of the patients found the intravaginal ring acceptable, one-third did not.

Effects of estrogen replacement therapy on the lipoprotein profile in postmenopausal women with ESRD

BACKGROUND

Patients with ESRD have excessive cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. In postmenopausal women with normal renal function, estrogen replacement therapy decreases cardiovascular mortality by 50%, in part because of their beneficial effects on the lipoprotein profile. Because of similarities in the lipoprotein profile between healthy, postmenopausal women, and women with ESRD, we examined the effects of estrogen replacement on lipoproteins in 11 postmenopausal women with ESRD.

METHODS

In a randomized, placebo-controlled crossover study (8 week treatment arms) using 2 mg daily of oral, micronized estradiol, 11 postmenopausal women with ESRD were treated. Neither baseline lipid nor lipoprotein abnormalities were used as entry criteria for study participation.

RESULTS

Blood estradiol levels were 19 +/- 4 with placebo and 194 +/- 67 pg/ml (P = 0.024) with estradiol treatment. Total HDL cholesterol concentrations increased from 52 +/- 19 mg/dl to 61 +/- 20 mg/dl (16%), with placebo and estradiol treatments, respectively (P = 0.002). Apolipoprotein A1 increased by 24.6% (P = 0.0002) with estradiol intervention. HDL2 concentrations were 19 +/- 13 with placebo and 24 +/- 16 with estradiol treatment (P = 0.046). There were no differences in total or LDL cholesterol, other lipoprotein fractions including Lp(a), and triglycerides with 2 mg daily estradiol treatment. No significant side effects were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Therefore, using standard dosage regimens for estrogen replacement therapy in postmenopausal women with ESRD, HDL cholesterol is increased to an extent that would be expected to improve their cardiovascular risk profile. Further studies are needed to assess whether estrogen replacement therapy decreases the incidence or severity of cardiovascular disease in ESRD patients to a similar degree compared with other women.

Sex-hormone binding globulin as an indicator of the hepatic impacts of continuous combined hormone replacement regimens

OBJECTIVES

Nonoral administration of hormone replacement therapy avoids the first pass metabolism of steroids in the liver. We wanted to determine to what extent it has an effect on the serum concentrations of sex-hormone binding globulin and the free testosterone index.

METHODS

Postmenopausal women received 50 microg per day transdermal estradiol associated with the use of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device (20 women) or a daily oral dose of 2 mg of estradiol and 1 mg of norethisterone acetate (20 women) for 1 year. Eight women, five in the nonoral and three in the oral therapy group discontinued the study.

RESULTS

Although serum sex-hormone binding globulin concentrations decreased in women receiving transdermal estradiol in combination with a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device, the free testosterone index did not change significantly. In the continuous oral regimen, no significant changes in serum sex-hormone binding globulin or free testosterone index were observed. The free testosterone index, however, was significantly higher in the nonoral therapy group after 6 and 12 months of treatment than in the oral therapy group.

CONCLUSIONS

Continuous progestin combined with continuous estrogen in oral and nonoral replacement therapy does not lead to a substantial androgenic excess in postmenopausal women. The intrauterine administration of levonorgestrel appears to have some hepatic effect.

Premenopausal ovariectomy-related bone loss: a randomized, double-blind, one-year trial of conjugated estrogen or medroxyprogesterone acetate

The purpose of this study was to contrast the effects of conventional estrogen treatment with medroxyprogesterone on cancellous and cortical bone change in the first year following premenopausal ovariectomy. This 1-year double-blind randomized therapy trial was stratified by osteoporosis family history and performed in an academic medical center and community hospitals. Premenopausal women 45 +/- 5 years old, postovariectomy for benign diseases were provided 600 mg/day of calcium and randomized to daily therapy with conjugated equine estrogen (CEE, 0.6 mg) or medroxyprogesterone (MPA, 10 mg). The primary outcome variable was spinal quantitative computed tomography (QCT) bone density change over 1 year with additional outcomes of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of proximal femur (FN), whole body (WB), and spine segment (WBS) and N-telopeptide, bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, and other bone marker, hormonal, and weight changes. Results in the 33 women completing the study, whose initial bone densities were normal (QCT 133 mg/cm3, femoral neck 0.94 g/cm2, whole body DXA 1.13 g/cm2), showed annual QCT loss during CEE therapy of -11.5 mg/cm3 (p < 0.0007) and MPA bone loss of -19.7 mg/cm3 (p < 0.0001). Losses were marginally greater on MPA than CEE (p = 0.04). Extremely high postovariectomy (5 days) and pretreatment resorption markers (> 3 SD above premenopausal normal levels) were significantly related to bone loss. Across the year, resorption decreased during CEE but increased on MPA treatment. Significant DXA bone losses were prevented by CEE treatment (-1.4% FN, -.4% WB, and -1.5% WBS, all NS). However, DXA bone loss was not prevented by MPA treatment (-5% FN, -2.8% WB, and -6.1% WBS, all p < 0.03). Average weight gain was significant (+ 3.2 +/- 4.0 kg) and greater on CEE than MPA (+ 4.7 vs. + 2.0 kg, p = 0.049). In conclusion, CEE therapy did not prevent significant 8% cancellous spinal bone loss in the first year following premenopausal ovariectomy, despite supplementation with 600 mg/day of calcium, good control of vasomotor symptoms, and nearly 5 kg of gain in weight. Significant DXA bone loss, however, was prevented by CEE, but not by MPA therapy. These unexpected results were statistically related to high bone resorption following ovariectomy, which CEE suppressed but MPA did not. Bone formation markers increased during MPA therapy but were unchanged during CEE therapy.

Differential effects on bone density of progestogen-only methods for contraception in premenopausal women

The question of differential effects on bone density by two different types of progestogen-only methods for contraception in premenopausal women was addressed. Data from a prospective randomized clinical trial among 22 premenopausal women, age 32.6 (range 20-45 years), who were randomly assigned to either of two treatments with continuous progestogens for contraception were analyzed; depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) or continuous levonorgestrel treatment with subdermal implants (Norplant), respectively. Forearm bone density (BMDprox) increased with 2.94% (p = 0.006) in women who were prescribed levonorgestrel, which was in contrast to stable values in those prescribed depot-medroxy-progesterone acetate; group difference at 6 months for BMDprox 3.4% (95% CI 1.3, 5.5; p = 0.025) and BMDdist 4.1% (95% CI - 1.3, 9.6; p = 0.077). The changes in bone density were consistent with the changes in biochemical indices for bone metabolism; DMPA users showed signs of increased bone turnover and users of levonorgestrel showed increased bone formation with increased levels of both alkaline phosphatase (p = 0.004) and osteocalcin (p = 0.007). The findings suggest an increase in bone density during treatment with levonorgestrel and stable values during short-term administration of DMPA, in standard clinical doses for contraception.

Effects of tibolone on lipoprotein(a) and HDL subfractions

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effects of tibolone, a synthetic steroid used to alleviate climacteric symptoms and prevent osteoporosis, on lipoprotein metabolism, with particular reference to lipoprotein(a) levels and HDL subfraction profiles.

DESIGN

Thirty nine postmenopausal women were treated with tibolone (Livial) 2.5 mg/day for 6 months and fasting serum lipoprotein levels were estimated at 0, 2, 4 and 6 months.

RESULTS

Lipoprotein(a) levels were reduced significantly over the 6 months from a median level of 245 (range < 60-780) mg/l to 152 (range < 60-530) mg/l, a reduction of 39% in the median level. A decrease was observed in approximately two thirds of the women. Reductions were noted in all 6 subjects whose pretreatment levels were high, although concentrations remained at a level associated with increased risk in all but one. There were significant decreases in triglycerides and VLDL cholesterol and no significant change in LDL cholesterol. There was a significant reduction of 18% in HDL cholesterol and a 26% reduction in the HDL2-HDL3 ratio.

CONCLUSION

The reduction in lipoprotein(a) levels may have a beneficial effect on cardiovascular risk, which could go some way towards balancing the potentially adverse effect on the cardiovascular system caused by the reduction in HDL cholesterol.

Oestrogens and atherosclerotic vascular disease--lipid factors

Cardiovascular disease remains the major cause of death for postmenopausal women in Western societies. The majority of epidemiological studies indicate that postmenopausal oestrogen replacement therapy is associated with a 50% reduction in the risk of cardiovascular disease, with much of the reduction being mediated by changes in the plasma concentration of cholesterol within high and low density lipoproteins. In addition to favourably influencing the plasma concentration of lipoproteins, oestrogens also influence the complex metabolism of lipoproteins in the arterial wall, helping to impede the formation of the atherosclerotic plaque. Whilst oestrogens alter endothelial function, vascular reactivity and fibrinolysis, these changes are also seen with reduction of LDL cholesterol and may partly reflect the altered concentration of plasma lipoproteins induced by oestrogens. Oral oestrogens have substantially greater favourable effects on LDL and HDL cholesterol than their transdermal counterparts but also result in greater hypertriglyceridaemia. Most progestogens antagonize the beneficial effects of oestrogens on lipoproteins in a dose-dependent manner; however, cyclical use of low doses of progestogens with an oral oestrogen generally retains a net beneficial effect. Lipoprotein levels fluctuate during cyclical therapy, the most adverse changes being noted at the end of the progestogen phase. Lipoprotein concentrations are constant during continuous combined regimens which have the potential for more prolonged exposure to an adverse progestational effect. Despite adverse effects on the lipoprotein profile, animal studies suggest that progestogens do not substantially reverse the beneficial effects of oestrogens on the development of atherosclerosis. Finally, oestrogen therapy may be useful in the management of postmenopausal women with hyperlipidaemia, and also in the secondary prevention of clinical sequelae in women with established atherosclerosis.

Effects of post-menopausal oestrogen-progestogen replacement therapy on serum lipids and lipoproteins: a review

There are strong indications that post-menopausal oestrogen replacement therapy has a protective effect on the cardiovascular system, due to changes in the lipid profile. There are also indications that the addition of progestogens to oestrogen therapy may negatively influence these effects on the lipid metabolism. The present survey was undertaken to provide a comprehensive summary of all the available data on the effect of combined oestrogen-progestogen treatment on the post-menopausal lipid profile published from 1984 onwards. It appears that many progestogens are capable of diminishing the beneficial changes induced by oestrogens. The ultimate effect depends on the type and daily dose of both the oestrogen and the progestogen component. Oestradiol or oestradiol valerate administered cyclically with progesterone or cyproterone acetate appear to have the most favourable impact on lipids and lipoproteins.