The effect of danazol and the LHRH agonist analogue goserelin (Zoladex) on the biological activity of luteinizing hormone in women with endometriosis

Danazol

A comprehensive profile of danazol describing the nomenclatures, formulae, elemental composition, appearance, uses and applications is presented. The profile contains the method which was utilized for the preparation of the drug substance and its respective scheme is outlined. The physical characteristics of the drug including the solubility, X-ray powder diffraction pattern, differential scanning calorimetry, thermal behavior and spectroscopic studies are described. The methods which were used for the analysis of the drug substance in bulk drug and/or in pharmaceutical formulations including the compendial, spectrophotometric, electrochemical and the chromatographic methods are reported. The stability, toxicity, pharmacokinetics, bioavailability, drug evaluation and monitoring, comparisons, pharmacology, in addition to several compiled reviews on the drug substance which were involved. Finally, two hundred and seventy-nine references are listed at the end of this profile.

WITHDRAWN: Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogues for pain associated with endometriosis

BACKGROUND

Endometriosis is a common gynaecological condition that frequently presents with the symptom of pain. The precise pathogenesis (mode of development) of endometriosis is unclear but it is evident that endometriosis arises by the dissemination of endometrium to ectopic sites and the subsequent establishment of deposits of ectopic endometrium. The observation that endometriosis is rarely seen in the hypo-oestrogenic (low levels of oestrogen) post-menopausal woman led to the concept of medical treatment by induction of a pseudo-menopause using Gonadotrophin Releasing Hormone Analogues (GnRHas). When administered in a non-pulsatile manner (the pituitary is normally stimulated by pulses of natural GnRH and all analogues act on the pituitary at a constant level) their use results in down regulation (switching off) of the pituitary and a hypogonadotrophic hypogonadal state (low levels of female hormones due to non stimulation of the ovary).

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effectiveness of Gonadotrophin Releasing Hormone analogues (GnRHas) in the treatment of the painful symptoms of endometriosis by comparing them with no treatment, placebo, other recognised medical treatments, and surgical interventions.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The search strategy of the Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility review group (please see Review Group details) was used to identify all randomised trials of the use of GnRHas for the treatment of the painful symptoms of endometriosis.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Trials were included if they were randomised, and considered the effectiveness of GnRHas in the treatment of the painful symptoms of endometriosis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Twenty-six studies had data appropriate for inclusion in the review. The largest group (15 studies) compared GnRHas with danazol. There are five studies comparing GnRHas with GnRHas plus add-back therapy, three comparing GnRHa with GnRHa in a different form or dose, one compares them with gestrinone, one with the combined oral contraceptive pill, and one with placebo. Data was extracted independently by two reviewers. The authors of eleven studies have been contacted to clarify missing or unclear data. Only four have replied to date. Data on relief of pain, change in revised American Fertility Society (rAFS) scores, and side effects was collected.

MAIN RESULTS

No difference was found between GnRHas and any of the other active comparators with respect to pain relief or reduction in endometriotic deposits. The side effect profiles of the different treatments were different, with danazol and gestrinone having more androgenic side effects, while GnRHas tend to produce more hypo-oestrogenic symptoms.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is little or no difference in the effectiveness of GnRHas in comparison with other medical treatments for endometriosis. GnRHas do appear to be an effective treatment. Differences that do exist relate to side effect profiles. Side effects of GnRHas can be ameliorated by the addition of addback therapy.

Goserelin

Goserelin (Zoladex), a gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue, reduces plasma/serum estrogen levels in pre- or perimenopausal women (to postmenopausal levels), and is indicated in hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer in this population group. Adjuvant goserelin monotherapy has similar efficacy to adjuvant chemotherapy in pre- or perimenopausal women with early, hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Furthermore, the addition of goserelin to adjuvant chemotherapy appeared to offer an advantage over chemotherapy alone in younger patients. Fewer patients remained amenorrheic after goserelin therapy than after chemotherapy. Complete endocrine blockade provided by the addition of tamoxifen to therapy including goserelin appears to improve outcomes. Thus, goserelin offers a valuable addition to the currently available options for treating pre- or perimenopausal women with hormone therapy-responsive early breast cancer, particularly for women wishing to regain ovarian function after treatment.

Physiological oestradiol administration does not change the biological to immunological ratio of LH in serum from post-menopausal women

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the effect of chronic physiological concentrations of oestradiol on the bioactivity (B) and immunoactivity (I) of LH in serum using radioimmunoassay (RIA) and a sensitive immunoradiometric (IRMA) assay.

DESIGN

Twelve post-menopausal, hysterectomized women received a 50-mg subcutaneous E2 implant, in the absence of progestogen treatment. Pretreatment serum samples were obtained on two occasions for measurement of E2 and FSH by radioimmunoassay and for measurement of LH by bioassay (BIO), immunoradiometric assay and radioimmunoassay. Further serum samples were obtained monthly for 6 months for assay as above.

RESULTS

The serum E2 level (basal levels < 70 pmol/l) rose following implant (P < 0.01) peaking at 1 month (mean 454, range 356-580 pmol/l) and remaining within premenopausal physiological levels for 6 months. There were falls in FSH, LH-RIA, LH-IRMA and LH-BIO (P < 0.001). There was no change in the B:I ratio for B:I-RIA or B:I-IRMA for LH which were 1.8 and 3.3, respectively pretreatment and 1.7 and 2.9 after 1 month's treatment.

CONCLUSION

The treatment of post-menopausal women with 50-mg E2 subcutaneous implants produces physiological premenopausal E2 levels for at least 6 months. There is no change in the B:I ratio of LH using either the RIA or IRMA during chronic E2 treatment.