Efficacy of a slow-release formulation of lanreotide (Autogel) 120 mg) in patients with acromegaly previously treated with octreotide long acting release (LAR): an open, multicentre longitudinal study

Long-Acting Gel Formulations: Advancing Drug Delivery across Diverse Therapeutic Areas

This multifaceted landscape of long-acting gels in diverse medical fields, aims to enhance therapeutic outcomes through localized treatment and controlled drug release. The objective involves advancements spanning cancer treatment, immunotherapy, diabetes management, neuroendocrine disorders, ophthalmic applications, contraception, HIV/AIDS treatment, chronic diseases, wound care, and antimicrobial treatments. It explores the potential of long-acting gels to offer sustained and extended drug release, targeted therapy, and innovative administration routes while addressing limitations such as scalability challenges and regulatory hurdles. Future directions focus on personalized therapies, biodegradability, combination therapies, interdisciplinary innovation, regulatory considerations, and patient-centric development. This comprehensive review highlights the pivotal role of long-acting gels in transforming therapeutic approaches and improving patient outcomes across various medical conditions.

A systematic literature review to evaluate extended dosing intervals in the pharmacological management of acromegaly

PURPOSE

This systematic literature review investigated whether extended dosing intervals (EDIs) of pharmacological acromegaly treatments reduce patient burden and costs compared with standard dosing, while maintaining effectiveness.

METHODS

MEDLINE/Embase/the Cochrane Library (2001-June 2021) and key congresses (2018-2021) were searched and identified systematic literature review bibliographies reviewed. Included publications reported on efficacy/effectiveness, safety and tolerability, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and patient-reported and economic outcomes in longitudinal/cross-sectional studies in adults with acromegaly. Interventions included EDIs of pegvisomant, cabergoline, and somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs): lanreotide autogel/depot (LAN), octreotide long-acting release (OCT), pasireotide long-acting release (PAS), and oral octreotide; no comparator was required.

RESULTS

In total, 35 publications reported on 27 studies: 3 pegvisomant monotherapy, 11 pegvisomant combination therapy with SRLs, 9 LAN, and 4 OCT; no studies reported on cabergoline, PAS, or oral octreotide at EDIs. Maintenance of normal insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) was observed in ≥ 70% of patients with LAN (1 study), OCT (1 study), and pegvisomant monotherapy (1 study). Achievement of normal IGF-I was observed in ≥ 70% of patients with LAN (3 studies) and pegvisomant in combination with SRLs (4 studies). Safety profiles were similar across EDI and standard regimens. Patients preferred and were satisfied with EDIs. HRQoL was maintained and cost savings were provided with EDIs versus standard regimens.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical efficacy/effectiveness, safety, and HRQoL outcomes in adults with acromegaly were similar and costs lower with EDIs versus standard regimens. Physicians may consider acromegaly treatment at EDIs, especially for patients with good disease control.

Self-Assembling Peptides: From Design to Biomedical Applications

Self-assembling peptides could be considered a novel class of agents able to harvest an array of micro/nanostructures that are highly attractive in the biomedical field. By modifying their amino acid composition, it is possible to mime several biological functions; when assembled in micro/nanostructures, they can be used for a variety of purposes such as tissue regeneration and engineering or drug delivery to improve drug release and/or stability and to reduce side effects. Other significant advantages of self-assembled peptides involve their biocompatibility and their ability to efficiently target molecular recognition sites. Due to their intrinsic characteristics, self-assembled peptide micro/nanostructures are capable to load both hydrophobic and hydrophilic drugs, and they are suitable to achieve a triggered drug delivery at disease sites by inserting in their structure's stimuli-responsive moieties. The focus of this review was to summarize the most recent and significant studies on self-assembled peptides with an emphasis on their application in the biomedical field.

Multicenter, Observational Study of Lanreotide Autogel for the Treatment of Patients with Acromegaly in Routine Clinical Practice in Germany, Austria and Switzerland

BACKGROUND

Evidence from controlled trials has shown that lanreotide autogel is effective in achieving biochemical and symptom control in patients with acromegaly. However, it is important to better understand the real-world patient population receiving lanreotide autogel treatment.

METHODS

In this non-interventional study the long-term treatment response to lanreotide autogel in adult patients with acromegaly from office-based centers or clinics in Germany, Austria and Switzerland was studied. Assessments included growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor-I levels, symptoms, quality of life, lanreotide plasma levels and tumor somatostatin receptor subtype expression. The primary endpoint was achievement of full biochemical control, defined as growth hormone ≤2.5 µg/L and insulin-like growth factor I normalization at month 12.

RESULTS

76 patients were enrolled from 21 sites. 7/51 (13.7%) patients of the efficacy population had full biochemical control at baseline, 15/33 (45.5%) at month 12 and 10/26 (38.5%) at month 24 of treatment. At 12 months of treatment higher rates of biochemical control were observed in the following subgroups: older patients (>53 years [median]), females, treatment-naïve patients, and patients with a time since diagnosis of longer than 1.4 years (median). No clinically relevant differences in acromegaly symptoms or quality of life scores were observed. Median fasting blood glucose and glycated hemoglobin levels remained unchanged throughout the study. No new safety signals were observed. Overall tolerability of treatment with lanreotide autogel was judged by 80.8% of the enrolled patients at month 12 as 'very good' or 'good'.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with lanreotide autogel in a real-world setting showed long-term effectiveness and good tolerability in patients with acromegaly.

Effectiveness of lanreotide autogel 120 mg at extended dosing intervals for acromegaly

PURPOSE

Recent data indicate that extended dosing intervals (EDIs) with lanreotide autogel 120 mg are effective and well-received among patients with acromegaly who have achieved biochemical control with monthly injections of long-acting somatostatin analogues (SSAs). We further evaluated the effectiveness of lanreotide autogel 120 mg delivered at EDIs (>4 weeks) in routine clinical practice.

METHODS

Cross-sectional, multicentre, observational study conducted to determine the effectiveness-measured by control of serum insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1)-of lanreotide autogel 120 mg at dosing intervals >4 weeks for ≥6 months in selected patients with acromegaly treated in routine clinical practice (NCT02807233). Secondary assessments included control of growth hormone (GH) levels, treatment adherence, patient satisfaction, and quality of life (QoL) using validated questionnaires (EQ-5D, AcroQoL, and TSQM-9). Patients who received radiotherapy within the last 6 months were excluded.

RESULTS

Among 109 patients evaluated, mean (SD) age was 59.1 (13.2) years. IGF-1 values were normal (mean [SD]: 175.0 [74.5], 95% CI: 160.8 -189.1) in 91.7% of cases and normal in 91.4% of patients without previous radiotherapy treatment (n = 81). GH levels were ≤2.5 and ≤1 ng/mL, respectively, in 80.6% and 58.3%. Most patients were treated either every 5-6 (57.8%) or 7-8 weeks (38.5%), with 2.8% treated greater than every 8 weeks. The mean AcroQoL score was 63.0 (20.1). The mean global treatment satisfaction score (TSQM-9) was 75.1 (16.6). Treatment adherence (defined as no missed injections) was 94.5%.

CONCLUSION

Lanreotide autogel 120 mg at intervals of >4 weeks provided IGF-1 control in more than 90% of patients with acromegaly. Treatment satisfaction and adherence were good. These findings support use of extended dosing intervals in patients who have achieved good biochemical control with long-acting SSAs.

ACROSTART: A retrospective study of the time to achieve hormonal control with lanreotide Autogel treatment in Spanish patients with acromegaly

OBJECTIVES

The ACROSTART study was intended to determine the time to achieve normalization of GH and IGF-I levels in responding patients with acromegaly administered different dosage regimens of lanreotide Autogel (Somatuline^® Autogel^®).

METHODS

From March 2013 to October 2013, clinical data from 57 patients from 17 Spanish hospitals with active acromegaly treated with lanreotide for ≥4 months who achieved hormonal control (GH levels <2.5ng/ml and/or normalized IGF-I levels in ≥2 measurements) were analyzed. The primary objective was to determine the time from start of lanreotide treatment to hormonal normalization.

RESULTS

Median patient age was 64 years, 21 patients were male, 39 patients had undergone surgery, and 14 patients had received radiotherapy. Median hormonal values at start of lanreotide treatment were: GH, 2.6ng/ml; IGF-I, 1.6×ULN. The most common starting dose of lanreotide was 120mg (29 patients). The main initial regimens were 60mg/4 weeks (n=13), 90mg/4 weeks (n=6), 120mg/4 weeks (n=13), 120mg/6 weeks (n=6), and 120mg/8 weeks (n=9). An initial treatment regimen with a long interval (≥6 weeks) was administered in 25 patients. Mean duration of lanreotide treatment was 68 months (7-205). Median time to achieve hormonal control was 4.9 months. Injections were managed without healthcare assistance in 13 patients. Median number of visits to endocrinologists until hormonal control was achieved was 3. Fifty-one patients were "satisfied"/"very satisfied" with treatment and 49 patients did not miss any dose.

CONCLUSIONS

Real-life treatment with lanreotide Autogel resulted in early hormonal control in responding patients, with high treatment adherence and satisfaction despite disparity in starting doses and dosing intervals.

Chromogranin A: From Laboratory to Clinical Aspects of Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors

Background. Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are characterized by having behavior and prognosis that depend upon tumor histology, primary site, staging, and proliferative index. The symptoms associated with carcinoid syndrome and vasoactive intestinal peptide tumors are treated with octreotide acetate. The PROMID trial assesses the effect of octreotide LAR on the tumor growth in patients with well-differentiated metastatic midgut NETs. The CLARINET trial evaluates the effects of lanreotide in patients with nonfunctional, well-, or moderately differentiated metastatic enteropancreatic NETs. Everolimus has been approved for the treatment of advanced pancreatic NETs (pNETs) based on positive PFS effects, obtained in the treated group. Sunitinib is approved for the treatment of patients with progressive gastrointestinal stromal tumor or intolerance to imatinib, because a randomized study demonstrated that it improves PFS and overall survival in patients with advanced well-differentiated pNETs. In a phase II trial, pasireotide shows efficacy and tolerability in the treatment of patients with advanced NETs, whose symptoms of carcinoid syndrome were resistant to octreotide LAR. An open-label, phase II trial assesses the clinical activity of long-acting repeatable pasireotide in treatment-naive patients with metastatic grade 1 or 2 NETs. Even if the growth of the neoplasm was significantly inhibited, it is still unclear whether its antiproliferative action is greater than that of octreotide and lanreotide. Because new therapeutic options are needed to counter the natural behavior of neuroendocrine tumors, it would also be useful to have a biochemical marker that can be addressed better in the management of these patients. Chromogranin A is currently the most useful biomarker to establish diagnosis and has some utility in predicting disease recurrence, outcome, and efficacy of therapy.

Diagnostic approach to subcutaneous nodules in patients with neuroendocrine tumours treated with depot somatostatin analogs: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

The presence of cutaneous nodules in patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP-NETs) receiving depot somatostatin analogs (SSAs) is a diagnostic challenge as differential diagnosis between injection site reactions and metastases is essential.

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the clinical, radiological, cytological and histopathological features of subcutaneous nodules in patients with GEP-NETs treated with SSAs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective, cross-sectional study of patients with GEP-NETs treated with SSAs in whom subcutaneous nodules were detected on routine abdominal computed tomography (CT) scans. High resolution and colour Doppler ultrasonography was performed. Those patients with inconclusive radiological studies went through fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) and/or biopsy.

RESULTS

Twelve patients (five males, seven females) were included (six midgut carcinoid NETs, six pancreatic NETs). Three patients received intramuscular depot octreotide, seven subcutaneous lanreotide, and two both treatments. CT scan findings were nonspecific. Sonography revealed a hyperechoic pattern in recent injections, and a hypoechoic pattern with a characteristic hyperechoic peripheral rim in long-term injections (more than 3 months after injection). On colour Doppler sonography, nodules showed no signs of intralesional vascularity. Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) was performed in five patients, revealing a characteristic acellular proteinaceous material. Biopsy in four patients showed different reactional infiltrates around the acellular material.

CONCLUSIONS

High resolution and colour Doppler ultrasonography may be very useful for the differential diagnosis of subcutaneous nodules in patients with GEP-NETs treated with SSAs. FNAC and a biopsy are useful tests for confirmation of the diagnosis in patients with inconclusive findings. We propose a management algorithm.

Somatostatin analogs, cabergoline and pegvisomant: comparing the efficacy of medical treatment for acromegaly

Therapies for acromegaly aim at normalizing hormonal excess and controlling tumor growth . Therapeutic approaches are surgery, pharmacotherapy and radiotherapy. Area covered: This review focuses on the role of medical therapy of acromegaly, comparing the efficacy of somatostatin analogues (SSA), dopamine-agonists (DA) and pegvisomant (PEG), the three available drug classes for treating acromegaly. To clarify the difference in response rates reported in the literature for these therapies, we performed a search for original articles published in PubMed. SSA represent the first-line approach to medical treatment. This therapy is effective in controlling acromegaly in about 40% of patients, however there are great differences in the reported hormonal efficacy of SSA in the different series. In patients partially resistant to SSA, cabergoline can be added when hormonal levels are close to normalization, resulting effective in control IGF-I levels in 43% of patients. In patients with higher hormonal levels PEG is indicated, normalizing IGF-I levels in 79.8% and 80.6% of cases when used in monotherapy or in combination with SSA. Pasireotide, the newly developed SSA multi-ligand receptor, represents a new option in SSA resistant patients. Expert commentary: Medical therapy represents an important therapeutic option resulting safe and effective in controlling acromegaly in a high percentage of patients. The best treatment should be individually tailored for each patient, taking into account sex, age, comorbidities, tumor characteristics and hormonal levels.

Interpreting biochemical control response rates with first-generation somatostatin analogues in acromegaly

CONTEXT

The somatostatin analogues octreotide LAR and lanreotide Autogel have been evaluated for the treatment of acromegaly in numerous clinical trials, with considerable heterogeneity in reported biochemical response rates. This review examines and attempts to account for these differences in response rates reported in the literature.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

PubMed was searched for English-language studies of a minimum duration of 24 weeks that evaluated ≥10 patients with acromegaly treated with octreotide LAR or lanreotide Autogel from 1990 to March 2015 and reported GH and/or IGF-1 data as the primary objective of the study.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Of the 190 clinical trials found, 18 octreotide LAR and 15 lanreotide Autogel studies fulfilled the criteria for analysis. It is evident from the protocols of these studies that multiple factors are capable of impacting on reported response rates. Prospective studies reporting an intention-to-treat analysis that evaluated medically naïve patients and used the composite endpoint of both GH and IGF-1 control were associated with lower response rates. The use of non-composite biochemical control endpoints, heterogeneous patient populations, analyses that exclude treatment non-responders, assay variability and prior responsiveness to medical therapy are just a few of the factors identified that likely contribute to higher success rates.

CONCLUSIONS

The wide range of reported response rates with somatostatin analogues may be confusing and could lead to misinterpretation by both the patient and the physician in certain situations. Understanding the factors that potentially drive the variation in response rates should allow clinicians to better gauge treatment expectations in specific patients.

Lanreotide Autogel 120 mg at extended dosing intervals in patients with acromegaly biochemically controlled with octreotide LAR: the LEAD study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate extended dosing intervals (EDIs) with lanreotide Autogel 120 mg in patients with acromegaly previously biochemically controlled with octreotide LAR 10 or 20 mg.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Patients with acromegaly had received octreotide LAR 10 or 20 mg/4 weeks for ≥ 6 months and had normal IGF1 levels. Lanreotide Autogel 120 mg was administered every 6 weeks for 24 weeks (phase 1); depending on week-24 IGF1 levels, treatment was then administered every 4, 6 or 8 weeks for a further 24 weeks (phase 2). Hormone levels, patient-reported outcomes and adverse events were assessed.

PRIMARY ENDPOINT

proportion of patients on 6- or 8-week EDIs with normal IGF1 levels at week 48 (study end).

RESULTS

107/124 patients completed the study (15 withdrew from phase 1 and two from phase 2). Of 124 patients enrolled, 77.4% were allocated to 6- or 8-week EDIs in phase 2 and 75.8% (95% CI: 68.3-83.3) had normal IGF1 levels at week 48 with the EDI (primary analysis). A total of 88.7% (83.1-94.3) had normal IGF1 levels after 24 weeks with 6-weekly dosing. GH levels were ≤ 2.5 μg/l in > 90% of patients after 24 and 48 weeks. Patient preferences for lanreotide Autogel 120 mg every 4, 6 or 8 weeks over octreotide LAR every 4 weeks were high.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with acromegaly achieving biochemical control with octreotide LAR 10 or 20 mg/4 weeks are possible candidates for lanreotide Autogel 120 mg EDIs. EDIs are effective and well received among such patients.

Discontinuation of somatostatin analogs while acromegaly is in long-term remission

PURPOSE

We aimed to evaluate the disease activity of medically controlled patients with acromegaly after withdrawal of somatostatin receptor ligands (SRL).

METHODS

Sixteen patients who were on a stable dose of SRL for more than 2 years and had at least 1 year of remission were included in the study. Five patients were on 10 mg, four were on 20 mg and three were on 30 mg of octreotide; whereas for lanreotide, one was on 60 mg, two were on 90 mg, and one was on 120 mg. All patients had received SRL with 28-day intervals. Basal GH, IGF1, glucose-suppressed GH levels were measured with 3-month intervals for a total of 12 months after withdrawal. Sella MRI evaluation was obtained at 6-month intervals. If the nadir GH level after glucose suppression was >1 ng/ml or IGF1 was above the normal limits during the follow-up period, SRL was restarted.

RESULTS

Three months after stopping SRL, 10 (63%) had biochemical disease recurrence. After 12 months of follow-up, in total 13 (81%) of the patients recurred. The final basal GH levels before withdrawal, basal GH at month-3, and glucose suppressed GH levels were significantly lower in patients with sustained remission (p = 0.003, p < 0.001, and p = 0.001). Basal GH and glucose suppressed GH levels at month-3 were correlated with the basal GH levels at month-0 (r = 0.6, p = 0.008 and r = 0.5, p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

The final GH levels prior to discontinuation of SRL should be taken into consideration in patients with acromegaly in long-term remission. Moreover, the first visit 3 months after withdrawal is critically important for determining the future status of remission.

The care continuum in acromegaly: how patients, nurses, and physicians can collaborate for successful treatment experiences

Patients with acromegaly (a condition of chronic growth hormone hypersecretion by a pituitary adenoma) often require pharmacological treatment. Somatostatin analogs (SSAs) such as pasireotide, lanreotide, and octreotide are frequently used as first-line medical therapy. As SSAs are delivered by regular subcutaneous or intramuscular injections, they can result in injection-related pain or anxiety and can be challenging to fit into patients' lifestyles. When combined with the prolonged, debilitating psychological complications associated with acromegaly, these administration challenges can negatively impact compliance, adherence, and quality of life. Proactively managing patients' expectations and providing appropriate, timely guidance are crucial for maximizing adherence, and ultimately, optimizing the treatment experience. As part of ongoing clinical research since 1997, our team at the University of Michigan has used SSAs to treat 30 patients with acromegaly. Based on our clinical experiences with multiple SSA administration regimens (long-acting intramuscular, long-acting deep subcutaneous, and twice-daily subcutaneous), we generated a dialog map that guides health care professionals through the many sensitive and complex patient communication issues surrounding this treatment process. Beginning with diagnosis, the dialog map includes discussion of treatment options, instruction on proper drug administration technique, and ensuring of appropriate follow-up care. At each step, we provide talking points that address the following: the patients' clinical situation; their geographic, economic, and psychological concerns; and their inclination to communicate with clinicians. We have found that involving patients, nurses, and physicians as equal partners in the treatment process optimizes treatment initiation, adherence, and persistence in acromegaly. By encouraging collaboration across the care continuum, this dialog map can facilitate identification of the treatment plan that is most likely to yield the best possible outcome.

Lanreotide autogel in acromegaly - a decade on

INTRODUCTION

The novel formulation of lanreotide, lanreotide (LAN) autogel (ATG), has been available in Europe since 2001 and USA from 2006 for the treatment of acromegaly. It is one of only two clinically available somatostatin analogs available for use in acromegaly. Data relating to the use of ATG in acromegaly, specifically relating to comparison to octreotide (OCT) LAR and patient acceptability and preference, have been slow to accumulate.

AREAS COVERED

We performed a comprehensive review of the original literature relating to development, pharmacokinetics, acceptability and clinical efficacy of ATG.

EXPERT OPINION

LAN ATG is a novel formulation of LAN consequent on self-assembly of nanotubules in water. Diffusion between molecules within the nanotubules and surrounding tissue fluid in vivo leads to pseudo first-order pharmacokinetics. Efficacy is equivalent to the alternate long-acting somatostatin analog, OCT LAR, normalizing growth hormone and IGF-I levels in around 60 and 50% respectively. Control of tumor growth is observed in over 95% of patients, with 64% seeing a clinically significant reduction in tumor size. ATG is provided in a prefilled syringe for deep subcutaneous injection, allowing self-injection, and may be administered up to 8 weeks greatly improving convenience for the patient. The data strongly support consideration of ATG as the medical therapy of choice for patients with acromegaly.

Octreotide for acromegaly treatment: a reappraisal

INTRODUCTION

Acromegaly is a rare disorder characterized by excess secretion of growth hormone (GH) generally caused by a pituitary macroadenoma and associated with reduced life expectancy if the disease is untreated. This article covers the recent available evidences published on octreotide , the first somatostatin analog introduced into clinical practice for the medical treatment of acromegaly.

AREAS COVERED

This article discusses i) pharmacology of somatostatin and octreotide; ii) biochemical effects of regular octreotide and long-acting repeatable formulation; iii) tumor shrinkage effects of octreotide in acromegaly; iv) impact of octreotide on acromegalic clinical manifestations and chronic complications; v) safety of octreotide and vi) place of octreotide in the guidelines for acromegaly treatment. Full-text articles in the English language were selected from a PubMed search spanning 1984 - 2013, for keywords including 'octreotide,' 'acromegaly,' 'GH,' 'IGF-I,' and 'tumor shrinkage.' Reference lists in selected papers were also used to broaden the search.

EXPERT OPINION

Octreotide is a mature drug with a consolidated favorable benefit versus risks profile in the treatment of acromegaly.

Investigational therapies for acromegaly

INTRODUCTION

The treatment of acromegaly aims at normalizing growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor (IGF-I) levels and controlling tumor growth. The approaches to therapy are essentially three: surgery and pharmacotherapy, alone or in combination, and radiotherapy, generally used in more aggressive tumors.

AREAS COVERED

This review focuses on the novel drug formulations being developed for medical therapy of acromegaly. Even though many efficient treatments have been made available to manage acromegaly in the last two decades, a significant number of patients remain still uncontrolled. Medical therapy represents an important therapeutic option and can be used as the first-line treatment in many patients. However, roughly 25% of patients might be considered as poor responsive or resistant to conventional long-acting somatostatin analogs (SSA) treatment. Therefore, new longer-acting SSA, oral SSA formulations, new combined therapies with weekly doses of pegvisomant, combination therapy with pegvisomant (PEG) and cabergoline (CAB) or SSA and new approaches have been proposed. New molecules are currently under investigation in clinical trials, such as the SSA multi-receptor ligand, pasireotide, which represents a promising option therapy, especially in patients not adequately controlled with currently available SSA. Further, temozolomide has been suggested as an efficient drug for treating GH-aggressive pituitary tumors resistant to conventional therapy.

EXPERT OPINION

All these novel SSA formulations and new molecules implement the available options in therapies of acromegaly to improve disease control. However, further studies are needed to define the exact role of these newer agents. The predicting factors for response to these new therapies should also be determined.

Pharmacoeconomic aspects of the treatment of pituitary gland tumours

Nowadays physicians are under economic pressure; therefore therapeutic decisions based on safety, efficacy, and the effectiveness of the medication also require economic analysis. The aim of this review is to discuss data concerning the cost-effectiveness of drug therapy in patients with hormonally active pituitary adenomas, namely growth hormone, adrenocorticotropic hormone, thyroid-stimulating hormone-secreting pituitary adenomas, prolactinoma and pituitary incidentaloma. In acromegalic patients using lanreotide is cheaper for health care payers and more convenient for physicians and patients because of the opportunity for self/partner injections, lower clogging risk and possibility of longer intervals between injections, while the efficacy is comparable with octreotide. Patients with prolactinomas should be treated with novel dopamine agonists, such as cabergoline or quinagolide, however, bromocriptine still remains a cheaper and almost as effective alternative. There are no easy methods or algorithms, but in general, extracting the maximum value from the investment in treatment is essential.

Comparison of octreotide LAR and lanreotide autogel as post-operative medical treatment in acromegaly

Long-acting somatostatin analogs are frequently used as adjuvant treatment of acromegaly patients after noncurative surgery. This sudy aims to compare the efficacy of octreotide long-acting release (OCT) and lanreotide Autogel (LAN) in acromegaly patients. Sixty-eight patients not cured by transsphenoidal endoscopic or microscopic pituitary surgery between 2003 and 2009 were retrospectively analyzed (25 men; 43 women; mean age 41.1 ± 10.9 years [range 18-65 years]). The patients were assigned randomly to OCT (n = 36) and LAN (n = 32) groups. Evaluations included insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) and growth hormone (GH) after oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) 3, 6, 12 and 18 months after starting medical treatment; pituitary magnetic resonance imaging was performed before treatment and after 3 and 12 months. Patients achieving IGF-I levels within the age and gender normal range and GH level <1 μg/l following OGTT were considered a 'biochemical cure'. Mean IGF-I and GH values and tumor volumes (cm(3)) in the LAN and OCT groups were similar in the post-operative period before initiation of medical treatment. A statistically significant decrease in GH and IGF-I levels was obtained for both treatment groups at each follow-up visit compared to the previous value. Tumor shrinkage after 12 months of treatment was statistically significant in both groups but the percentage tumor shrinkage (28.5% vs. 34.9%, P = 0.166) and rate of patients achieving biochemical cure (63.9 and 78.1%, P = 0.454) were similar between OCT and LAN groups, respectively. OCT and LAN treatment options have similar efficacy for ensuring biochemical cure and tumor shrinkage in acromegaly patients who had noncurative surgery.

Management options for persistent postoperative acromegaly

This article presents management options for the patient with acromegaly after noncurative surgery. The current evidence for repeat surgery, adjuvant medical therapy with somatostatin analogues, dopamine agonists, the growth hormone receptor antagonist pegvisomant, combination medical therapy, and radiotherapy in the context of persistent postoperative disease are summarized. The relative advantages and disadvantages of each of these treatment modalities are explored, and a general treatment algorithm that integrates these modalities is proposed.

Somatostatin analogs as a first-line treatment in acromegaly: when is it appropriate?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To discuss the role of medical therapy of acromegaly as a first-line treatment, focusing on recent data on the use of somatostatin analogs (SSAs), the first-choice pharmacotherapy for treating acromegaly.

RECENT FINDINGS

Despite pituitary surgery and radiotherapy, a significant number of patients with acromegaly needed adjuvant medical therapy, and primary medical therapy nowadays is increasingly considered. According to a recent consensus statement on the management of acromegaly, primary pharmacological therapy with SSAs may be indicated in patients who are otherwise poor surgical candidates or refuse surgery, and in those in whom there is a low probability of a surgical cure. The long-acting SSAs have been found to be effective in improving symptoms and signs of acromegaly in a high percentage of patients and induce normalization of growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor-I levels approximately in 60-80% of patients, respectively. Evidence has suggested that SSAs induce a clinically significant tumor shrinkage when given as first-line, when this reduction of tumor volume could be helpful in improving the outcome of subsequent surgery or improving the clinical syndrome in patients with unacceptable surgical risk, whereas the tumor shrinkage was seen less frequently when the drug was used after surgical resection and/or radiotherapy.

SUMMARY

Pharmacological management plays a pivotal role in the treatment of acromegaly, and first-line medical therapy with SSAs is being widely used in clinical practice, either prior to surgery or in patients who are otherwise poor surgical candidates and in those in whom there is a low probability of a surgical cure.

Clinical experience with lanreotide for the treatment of acromegaly

Acromegaly is a rare disease, characterized in adults by its distinctive appearance of facial dysmorphism and swollen fingers. It is caused by an overproduction of growth hormone (GH) in more than 99% of patients and in nearly all cases is due to a pituitary adenoma. If surgical resection of the adenoma is not effective, medical treatment is usually the next treatment option. The most commonly used medications are the somatostatin analogues octreotide and lanreotide. Lanreotide is a synthetic somatostatin analogue and is available as slow-release microparticle (every 7-14 days) and prolonged-release liquid (autogel, every 28-56 days) formulations. Lanreotide autogel is a supersaturated aqueous formulation for deep subcutaneous injection and is sold in a ready-to-use prefilled syringe. This ease of use allows self or partner administration at home. This article reviews the use of lanreotide in the treatment of acromegaly and its advantages and disadvantages compared with other somatostatin analogues.

Gamma knife radiosurgery for acromegaly

Acromegaly is debilitating disease occasionally refractory to surgical and medical treatment. Stereotactic radiosurgery, and in particular Gamma Knife surgery (GKS), has proven to be an effective noninvasive adjunct to traditional treatments, leading to disease remission in a substantial proportion of patients. Such remission holds the promise of eliminating the need for expensive medications, along with side effects, as well as sparing patients the damaging sequelae of uncontrolled acromegaly. Numerous studies of radiosurgical treatments for acromegaly have been carried out. These illustrate an overall remission rate over 40%. Morbidity from radiosurgery is infrequent but can include cranial nerve palsies and hypopituitarism. Overall, stereotactic radiosurgery is a promising therapy for patients with acromegaly and deserves further study to refine its role in the treatment of affected patients.

Lanreotide depot deep subcutaneous injection: a new method of delivery and its associated benefits

Acromegaly is a rare disease characterized by excessive growth hormone secretion, usually from a pituitary tumor. Treatment options include surgery, medical therapy, and in some cases, radiation therapy. Current medical therapy consists of treatment with somatostatin analog medications or a growth hormone receptor antagonist. There are two somatostatin analogs currently in use, octreotide and lanreotide. Both are supplied in long-acting formulations and are of comparable biochemical efficacy. Lanreotide is supplied in a prefilled syringe and is injected into deep subcutaneous tissue. Studies have been conducted to assess the efficacy of self- or partner administration, and have demonstrated that injection of lanreotide can be accomplished reliably and safely outside a physician's office. For patients who have achieved biochemical control with lanreotide, the FDA has recently approved an extended dosing interval. Selected patients may be able to receive the medication less frequently with injections of 120 mg administered every 6 or 8 weeks. This review focuses on the use of lanreotide in the treatment of acromegaly, the safety and efficacy of the drug, and the benefits afforded to patients because of unique aspects of the delivery of lanreotide.

Safety review: dose optimization of somatostatin analogs in patients with acromegaly and neuroendocrine tumors

INTRODUCTION

Patients with either acromegaly or neuroendocrine tumors (NET) can be treated with somatostatin analogs to relieve symptoms and improve disease control. However, there is an absence of large clinical trials specifically designed to document the safety when increases in somatostatin analog dosing are needed in patients who do not achieve their treatment goals. To fully explore and communicate any potential risks, we conducted a literature review and present a summary of the studies documenting the safety and tolerability of dose optimization with somatostatin analogs in patients with acromegaly and NET.

METHODS

A literature search was undertaken to find clinical studies specifically reporting the effects of dose titration using the depot formulations of the somatostatin analogs, octreotide long-acting repeatable (LAR) or lanreotide, in patients with acromegaly and NET.

RESULTS

Publications that described the treatment and management of patients with acromegaly and NET were reviewed. The rationale for dose optimization, including high-dose treatment in patients who are inadequately controlled on conventional doses and the safety and tolerability of somatostatin analogs, is discussed.

CONCLUSION

A review of published clinical studies demonstrates that dose optimization provides additional biochemical control in patients with acromegaly and NET who are inadequately controlled with conventional starting doses of octreotide LAR and lanreotide ATG. The benefits of dose optimization include improved efficacy without a significant change in the recorded adverse events and the tolerability of the treatment. Therefore, patient response to treatment should be routinely monitored and their somatostatin analog dose increased or decreased thereafter according to their individual response.

Clinical efficacy and safety results for dose escalation of somatostatin receptor ligands in patients with acromegaly: a literature review

Acromegaly is a rare disease with a multifaceted clinical presentation. In 90-95% of patients with acromegaly, the disease is caused by a growth hormone (GH)-secreting pituitary adenoma with elevated GH levels that ultimately induce excessive hepatic secretion of insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1). Somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs) are considered the standard medical choice for the treatment of acromegaly, and normalization of GH and IGF-1 is attainable with effective therapy. This review aims to summarize the literature relative to SRL dose escalation therapy in patients with acromegaly. A United States National Library of Medicine PubMed search of SRL's was conducted using the following search terms: ((((LAR) OR ATG) OR octreotide) OR lanreotide Autogel) AND acromegaly. Related articles in non peer-reviewed journals were excluded. The rationale and benefits of SRL dose optimization therapy were investigated with emphasis on describing the clinical recognition, treatment, and management of patients with acromegaly. We found that dose escalation could provide additional biochemical control of acromegaly in patients who are inadequately controlled with conventional starting doses of octreotide LAR and lanreotide Autogel(®). Furthermore, patients should routinely have their GH and IGF-1 levels closely monitored and their SRL dose increased or decreased thereafter according to individual response.

[Role of somatostatin receptor ligands in the treatment of acromegaly--literature review]

Acromegaly is a rare disease with typical clinical manifestations. Untreated acromegaly carries a 2-4-fold increase in mortality in long-term outcome. The goal of treatment is double, including biochemical control of the disease (normalization of serum IGF1 levels compared to age and gender matched controls, GH levels below 1 ng/ml after oral glucose load, or random GH below 2.5 ng/ml) and control of the tumor mass. The therapeutic modalities currently available for the treatment of acromegaly are: surgery, medical therapy, radiation therapy and their combinations. The cornerstones of medical therapy in acromegaly are the somatostatin receptor ligands due to their effectiveness in controlling GH excess in 60-70 % of patients and their beneficial effects on tumor volume. Somatostatin analogues have an established role as adjuvant therapy after non-curative surgery, and evidence suggests their use as primary treatment for selected patients. The long-term use of somatostatin receptor ligands is safe and they are well tolerated. Future medical therapy consists of pasireotide, a novel, universal somatostatin receptor agonist, and a new class of drugs named dopastatins. The latter so-called chimeric molecules have strong affinity for somatostatin receptors and dopamine-2 receptors, resulting in a more effective blocking of GH secretion, according to preliminary data. The authors of this paper review the current medical therapy of acromegaly, focusing on the role of somatostatin receptor ligands.

The clinical relevance of chromogranin A as a biomarker for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

Chromogranin A, although it exhibits limitations, is currently the most useful general tumor biomarker available for use in the diagnosis and management of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). The value of the chromogranin A lies in its universal cosecretion by the majority of neuroendocrine cells that persists after malignant transformation. Clinicians aware of the physiologic role of chromogranin A and its secretion in a variety of non-NET-related pathologic conditions can use this protein as a moderately effective tumor biomarker in the management of GEP-NETs.

Acromegaly: a review of current medical therapy and new drugs on the horizon

Acromegaly is a disease that results from a growth hormone (GH)–secreting pituitary tumor. Clinically, the disease is characterized by excessive skeletal growth, soft tissue enlargement with disfigurement, and increased risk of cardiovascular death. The goals of treatment are the removal or reduction of the tumor mass via surgery and normalization of GH secretion. Another treatment goal is the preservation of normal pituitary function if possible. Transsphenoidal surgery by an experienced neurosurgeon is usually the first line of therapy, especially for small tumors. Surgeon expertise is crucial for outcome, with dedicated pituitary surgeons having better results. However, overall cure rates remain low because patients with these tumors usually present at an incurable stage. Therefore, medical therapy to control excess GH secretion plays a significant role in a large proportion of patients with acromegaly who are not cured by surgery or other forms of therapy, such as radiotherapy, and/or are awaiting the effects of radiotherapy. If surgery is not curative, lifelong monitoring and the control of excess GH is usually necessary by a care team experienced in handling this chronic disease. In the past decade major progress has occurred in the development of highly specific and selective pharmacological agents that have greatly facilitated more aggressive management of active acromegaly. Treatment approach should be individualized and take into consideration a patient's tumor size and location, symptoms, comorbid conditions, and preferences. Because a surgical cure can be difficult to achieve, all patients, even those with what seems to be a clinically and biochemically inactive disease, should undergo long-term biochemical testing and pituitary MR imaging.

Octreotide long-acting release (LAR): a review of its use in the management of acromegaly

Octreotide long-acting release (LAR) [Sandostatin LAR] is a somatostatin analogue with a well established clinical profile in patients with acromegaly. It binds to somatostatin receptor subtypes 2 and 5 with high potency to reduce the production and secretion of growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I. Octreotide LAR is administered intramuscularly once every 28 days, in contrast to the subcutaneous formulation which requires administration two to three times daily. In several noncomparative trials, octreotide LAR was effective as primary therapy in normalizing GH and IGF-I levels and reducing tumour volume in patients with acromegaly. In addition, no significant difference was seen between octreotide LAR and surgery or lanreotide long-acting (LA) or lanreotide Autogel(R) (ATG) in small, randomized or observational, primary therapy trials. In another small, randomized trial, preoperative octreotide LAR followed by surgery was no more effective than surgery alone in terms of normalizing IGF-I levels, except in patients with macroadenoma. Octreotide LAR has also demonstrated good efficacy as postoperative adjuvant therapy, alone or in combination with pegvisomant, in randomized or noncomparative trials. In patients with different treatment histories (mixed populations), the efficacy of octreotide LAR appears to be generally similar to that of lanreotide ATG and greater than that of lanreotide LA, according to data from switching or crossover studies. Also in mixed populations, the efficacy of octreotide LAR was not significantly different to that of pegvisomant in terms of normalizing IGF-I levels in a randomized trial, and octreotide LAR demonstrated good efficacy in combination with cabergoline in a small, sequential-treatment trial. Octreotide LAR was generally well tolerated in clinical trials, with the most commonly occurring adverse events being gastrointestinal or hepatobiliary in nature. Thus, octreotide LAR continues to be a valuable option in the treatment of acromegaly.

Pharmacological management of acromegaly: a current perspective

Acromegaly is a chronic disorder of enhanced growth hormone (GH) secretion and elevated insulin-like growth factor–I (IGF-I) levels, the most frequent cause of which is a pituitary adenoma. Persistently elevated GH and IGF-I levels lead to substantial morbidity and mortality. Treatment goals include complete removal of the tumor causing the disease, symptomatic relief, reduction of multisystem complications, and control of local mass effect. While transsphenoidal tumor resection is considered first-line treatment of patients in whom a surgical cure can be expected, pharmacological therapy is playing an increased role in the armamentarium against acromegaly in patients unsuitable for or refusing surgery, after failure of surgical treatment (inadequate resection, cavernous sinus invasion, or transcapsular intraarachnoid invasion), or in select cases as primary treatment. Three broad drug classes are available for the treatment of acromegaly: somatostatin analogs, dopamine agonists, and GH receptor antagonists.

Somatostatin analogs are considered as the first-line pharmacological treatment of acromegaly, although efficacy varies among the different formulations. Octreotide long-acting release (LAR) appears to be more efficacious than lanreotide sustained release (SR). Lanreotide Autogel (ATG) has been shown to result in similar biological control as octreotide LAR, and there may be a benefit in switching from one to the other in some cases of treatment failure. The novel multireceptor somatostatin analog pasireotide, currently in Phase II clinical trials, also shows promise in the treatment of acromegaly. Dopamine agonists have been the earliest and most widely used agents in the treatment of acromegaly but have been found to be less effective than somatostatin analogs. In this class of drugs, cabergoline has shown greater efficacy and tolerability than bromocriptine. Dopamine agonists have the advantage of oral administration, resulting in increased use in select patient groups. Selective GH receptor antagonists, such as pegvisomant, act by blocking the effects of GH, resulting in decreased IGF-I production despite persistent elevation of GH serum levels. Thus far, tumor growth has not been a concern during pegvisomant therapy. However, combination treatment with somatostatin analogs may counteract these effects. The authors discuss the latest guidelines for biochemical cure and highlight the efficacy of combination therapy. In addition, the effects of pharmacological presurgical treatment on surgical outcome are explored.

The endocrine tumor summit 2008: appraising therapeutic approaches for acromegaly and carcinoid syndrome

The Endocrine Tumor Summit convened in December 2008 to address 6 statements prepared by panel members that reflect important questions in the treatment of acromegaly and carcinoid syndrome. Data pertinent to each of the statements were identified through review of pertinent literature by one of the 9-member panel, enabling a critical evaluation of the statements and the evidence supporting or refuting them. Three statements addressed the validity of serum growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) concentrations as indicators or predictors of disease in acromegaly. Statements regarding the effects of preoperative somatostatin analog use on pituitary surgical outcomes, their effects on hormone and symptom control in carcinoid syndrome, and the efficacy of extended dosing intervals were reviewed. Panel opinions, based on the level of available scientific evidence, were polled. Finally, their views were compared with those of surveyed community-based endocrinologists and neurosurgeons.

Medical therapy of acromegaly in Turkey

Acromegaly is associated with multiple co-morbidities and risk of premature mortality. Mortality rate of acromegalic patients is similar to that of the general population when normal GH levels are achieved. Surgery is the mainstay of acromegaly but when surgery fails to achieve disease control, or when surgery is impossible or contraindicated, patients are offered medical therapy and/or radiotherapy. Current medical therapy modalities were revised in this short review.

Chromogranin A--biological function and clinical utility in neuro endocrine tumor disease

BACKGROUND

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are a form of cancer that differ from other neoplasia in that they synthesize, store, and secrete peptides, e.g., chromogranin A (CgA) and amines. A critical issue is late diagnosis due to failure to identify symptoms or to establish the biochemical diagnosis. We review here the utility of CgA measurement in NETs and describe its biological role and the clinical value of its measurement.

METHODS

Literature review and analysis of the utility of plasma/serum CgA measurements in NETs and other diseases.

RESULTS

CgA is a member of the chromogranin family; its transcription and peptide processing are well characterized, but its precise function remains unknown. Levels are detectable in the circulation but vary substantially (approximately 25%) depending on which assay is used. Serum and plasma measurements are concordant. CgA is elevated in approximately 90% of gut NETs and correlates with tumor burden and recurrence. Highest values are noted in ileal NETs and gastrointestinal NETs associated with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. Both functioning and nonfunctioning pancreatic NETs have elevated values. CgA is more frequently elevated in well-differentiated tumors compared to poorly differentiated NETs. Effective treatment is often associated with decrease in CgA levels. Proton pump inhibitors falsely increase CgA, but levels normalize with therapy cessation.

CONCLUSIONS

CgA is currently the best available biomarker for the diagnosis of NETs. It is critical to establish diagnosis and has some utility in predicting disease recurrence, outcome, and efficacy of therapy. Measurement of plasma CgA is mandatory for the effective diagnosis and management of NET disease.

Rapid and sustained reduction of serum growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor-1 in patients with acromegaly receiving lanreotide Autogel therapy: a randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter study with a 52 week open extension

The study was designed to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of the 28-day prolonged-release Autogel formulation of the somatostatin analogue lanreotide (Lan-Autogel) in unselected patients with acromegaly. The study comprised four phases: washout; a double-blind comparison with placebo, at a single randomized dose (60, 90 or 120 mg) of Lan-Autogel; a single-blind, fixed-dose phase for four injections (placebo group was re-allocated to active treatment); and eight injections with doses tailored according to biochemical response. Serum samples were assessed for growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) levels, at weeks 4, 13, 14, 15, 16, 32 and 52. 108 patients were enrolled and 99 completed 52 weeks' treatment. Four weeks after the first injection, serum GH levels decreased by >50% from baseline in 63% of patients receiving Lan-Autogel compared with 0% receiving placebo (P < 0.001). After four injections, 72% of patients had a >50% reduction in GH levels; 49% patients achieved GH levels < or = 2.5 ng/ml; 54% had normalized IGF-1; and 38% achieved the combined criterion of GH level < or = 2.5 ng/ml and normalized IGF-1. The corresponding proportions by week 52 were 82, 54, 59 and 43%, respectively. In patients not requiring dose escalation to 120 mg, 85% achieved biochemical control (combined criterion). Treatment was well tolerated by all patients. In conclusion, Lan-Autogel was effective in controlling GH and IGF-1 hypersecretion in patients with acromegaly and showed a rapid onset of action.

Effects of lanreotide SR and Autogel on tumor mass in patients with acromegaly: a systematic review

Long-acting somatostatin analogs (SSA) are widely used for the treatment of acromegaly achieving biochemical control of the disease in 50-75% of the patients. One of the goals of the treatment of acromegaly is the control of tumor growth, especially in patients in whom SSAs are used as first-line therapy. Over the recent years, there has been growing evidence that SSAs are able to induce tumor shrinkage in patients with acromegaly. However, most of the data are from patients under treatment with octreotide, either subcutaneously or intramuscularly with long-acting formulation, whereas the data on lanreotide SR or Autogel are very few. Indeed, octreotide and lanreotide, i.e. the two commercially available SSAs, show slight differences in pharmacokinetics and patterns of receptor affinities with potentially different therapeutic effects. We aimed to perform a systematic review of literature data concerning the shrinkage effects of long-acting lanreotide in patients with acromegaly. The analysis was focused on the following issues: differences in shrinkage effects between primary and secondary medical treatment, predictive value of baseline tumor volume and correlation between biochemical control and shrinkage effects. The peer-reviewed medical literature was searched to identify clinical trials studying the effects of lanreotide SR or Autogel on adenoma size in acromegaly. To be included in this analysis, studies had one of the following designs: randomized controlled trial; prospective, nonrandomized trial; retrospective study. Twenty-two studies were found to be eligible for the final analysis, in which tumor size was measured as an end-point for lanreotide treatment. Overall a total of 32.8% of patients experienced a variable degree (from 10 to 77%) of tumor shrinkage during lanreotide SR or Autogel treatment. The analysis showed that tumor shrinkage was more frequent in naïve patients as compared with those previously treated by radiotherapy, surgery or drugs other than lanreotide. The data on the correlation between tumor shrinkage and baseline tumor size were discordant, but when baseline tumor size was specified, more than 80% of patients undergoing shrinkage under lanreotide Autogel had macroadenomas. Finally, with lanreotide Autogel there was no evident correlation between biochemical response and tumor shrinkage. Our systematic review of the literature shows that lanreotide particularly when used as first-line therapy is able to quite frequently induce tumor shrinkage in patients with acromegaly. This finding suggests that this drug may have a role in the primary treatment of acromegaly.

Medical therapy of acromegaly: efficacy and safety of somatostatin analogues

Acromegaly is a chronic disease with signs and symptoms due to growth hormone (GH) excess. The most frequent cause of acromegaly is a GH-producing pituitary adenoma. Chronic GH excess is accompanied by long-term complications of the locomotor (arthrosis) and cardiovascular (atherosclerosis, cardiomyopathy) systems and is, when untreated, associated with an increased mortality. The aim of treatment of acromegaly is to improve symptoms, to achieve local tumour mass control, and to decrease morbidity and mortality. Treatment options include surgery, medical therapy and radiotherapy. Transsphenoidal surgery is the first choice of treatment when a definitive cure can be achieved, particularly in the case of microadenomas and when decompression of surrounding structures (optic chiasm, ophthalmic motor nerves) is indicated. Primary medical therapy has been increasingly applied in recent years, especially when a priori chances of surgical cure are low (because of adenoma size and localization) and in patients with advanced age and/or serious co-morbidity. In addition, preoperative primary medical therapy may result in tumour shrinkage, facilitating tumour resection, and may reduce perioperative complications due to GH excess. Within the spectrum of medical therapy, long-acting somatostatin analogues (somatostatins) are considered as first-line treatment. Treatment with somatostatin analogues results in GH control in approximately 60% of patients. In addition, somatostatin analogues induce tumour shrinkage in 30-50% of patients, particularly when applied as primary therapy. Prolonged treatment with somatostatin analogues appears to be safe and is usually well tolerated. The currently available somatostatin analogues, octreotide and lanreotide, seem to be equally effective; however, this should still be evaluated in prospective, randomized trials evaluating efficacy with respect to GH control and tumour shrinkage. In patients with an insufficient clinical and biochemical response to somatostatin analogues, combination therapy with dopamine receptor agonists or the GH receptor antagonist pegvisomant usually leads to disease control. New developments in the medical therapy of acromegaly include the universal somatostatin receptor agonist pasireotide, which has a broader affinity for all somatostatin receptor (sst) subtypes compared with the currently available somatostatin analogues with preferential affinity for the sst2 receptor, and chimeric compounds that interact with both somatostatin and dopamine receptors with synergizing effects on GH secretion.

Cost-effectiveness of lanreotide Autogel in treatment algorithms of acromegaly

The introduction of effective pharmacological treatments has changed the management of acromegaly. However, chronic, life-long treatment with somatostatin analogues and/or growth hormone receptor antagonists is very expensive. We estimated the costs of treatment algorithms to control acromegaly from a Dutch perspective. We used the following assumptions: after the diagnosis of acromegaly there is a mean remaining lifespan of approximately 33 years; the success rates of surgery and somatostatin analogues in controlling the disease are approximately 60%; and the lifelong costs of different algorithms to control acromegaly in 100 patients ranged from 43 million euros (primary surgery and secondary somatostatin analogues) to 57 million euros (primary somatostatin analogues and secondary surgery) and even reached 95 million euros (medical treatment only). In algorithms that include trans-sphenoidal surgery, the lifetime treatment costs are almost 46-59% cheaper per 100 patients than in algorithms with medical treatment but without trans-sphenoidal surgery. Algorithms with primary surgery and secondary somatostatin analogs are 30% cheaper per 100 patients than algorithms with primary somatostatin analogues and secondary surgery. Per 100 patients, algorithms including lanreotide Autogel are 14-34% more expensive than algorithms including octreotide long-acting release. These life-long costs should be taken into consideration when making choices between treatment algorithms.

Significant tumour shrinkage after 12 months of lanreotide Autogel-120 mg treatment given first-line in acromegaly

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate GH and IGF-I control and tumour shrinkage in newly diagnosed patients with acromegaly treated first-line with lanreotide-Autogel (ATG) 120 mg. Design Open, prospective.

PATIENTS

Twenty-six patients (17 women, aged 31-70 years): eight enclosed and 12 extrasellar (eight invasive) macroadenomas and six microadenomas (one invasive). ATG 120 mg initially given every 4 weeks for 12 weeks; then intervals between injections increased to every 6 or 8 weeks if GH levels were <or= 2.5 or < 1 microg/l (equal to 6.5 and 2.6 mU/l), respectively.

RESULTS

Final dosage was ATG 120 mg every 4 weeks in nine patients (34.6%), every 6 weeks in eight patients (30.8%) and every 8 weeks in the remaining nine patients (34.6%). After 12 months, both GH and IGF-I were controlled in 14 patients (53.8%). The mean tumour volume decreased from 1405 +/- 1827 mm(3) at study entry to 960 +/- 1381 mm(3) after 6 months, and 799 +/- 1161 mm(3) after 12 months (P < 0.0001). Overall tumour shrinkage was 35.8 +/- 28.1% after 6 months and 48.4 +/- 27.6% after 12 months. After 12 months, 20 patients (76.9%) achieved > 25% tumour shrinkage: 12 of 14 with controlled disease (85.7%) and 8 of 12 with noncontrolled disease (66.7%; P = 0.49). Hyperhydrosis, paresthesiae and arthralgias significantly reduced after treatment. No patient withdrew from the study because of adverse events.

CONCLUSION

ATG 120 mg in newly diagnosed patients with acromegaly controls GH and IGF-I secretion in 53.8% and induces >or= 25% tumour shrinkage in 76.9% during a 12-month period. The treatment was associated with improvement of clinical symptoms and with a good safety profile.

Lanreotide for the treatment of acromegaly

Lanreotide is an eight-amino acid peptide, which is an analog of the native somatostatin peptide, physiological inhibitor of growth hormone (GH). The drug shows high binding affinity for somatostatin receptors, SSTR2 and SSTR5, which is the primary mechanism considered to be responsible for decreasing GH secretion and GH cell proliferation in acromegaly. Two different formulations of lanreotide are currently available: lanreotide slow release, which requires intramuscular injection every 7-14 days, and lanreotide autogel, which requires deep subcutaneous injection every 4-8 weeks. Several studies have been published to date on the use of lanreotide in acromegaly. Antisecretory efficacy has been reported in 35%-70% of cases; this huge variability is probably explained by different indications (eg, primary or adjunctive postsurgical treatment), or the fact that some studies were based on patients known to be responders to somatostatin analogs. As a primary treatment, antisecretory efficacy was very similar, confirming the possibility of lanreotide as an option in cases of unsuccessful surgery, contraindication, or surgery refusal. Lanreotide also has antitumoral effects as it induces a decrease in tumor volume of [Symbol: see text]25% in 30%-70% of patients. This could be beneficial before transsphenoidal surgery, as a pretreatment, to decrease tumor volume and ease surgery; however, to date, advantages in terms of final remission or uncured status remain a matter of debate. Side effects are rare; the most frequent being gastrointestinal discomfort and increased risk of gallstone formation, and glucose metabolism modifications. Comparison with the other somatostatin analog, octreotide, tends to show identical levels of efficacy between both drugs. Lanreotide thus seems to be an effective treatment in acromegaly. To date, however, lanreotide is still considered as only suspending GH secretion, thus requiring prolonged and costly treatment.

Effects of lanreotide Autogel on growth hormone, insulinlike growth factor 1, and tumor size in acromegaly: a 1-year prospective multicenter study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of lanreotide Autogel on growth hormone and insulinlike growth factor 1 (IGF-1) concentrations and tumor size in patients with acromegaly.

METHODS

Between September 2004 and March 2006, patients with active acromegaly who had not previously been treated with somatostatin analogues or received irradiation were enrolled in a 1-year, prospective, open, multicenter study. Lanreotide Autogel was injected subcutaneously starting with 90 mg every 4 weeks for 2 cycles and then individually titrated, aiming for safe growth hormone concentrations (<2.5 ng/mL) and normal age-matched IGF-1 concentrations. Tumor shrinkage, clinical score, pituitary function, and safety parameters were evaluated.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients (15 women, 12 men) were enrolled. One patient withdrew because of treatment intolerance, and 5 proceeded to neurosurgery 6 months into the study. Lanreotide Autogel was the primary treatment in 19 patients (4 with microadenoma, 15 with macroadenoma) and the adjuvant treatment in 8 patients in whom it followed a previous unsuccessful neurosurgery. In the 26 patients, safe growth hormone values were achieved in 11 (42%), normal IGF-1 values in 14 (54%), and both targets were achieved in 10 (38%). Tumors shrank in 16 of the 22 patients (73%) in whom tumor shrinkage could be evaluated. The maximal vertical diameter of the tumor decreased by a mean of 24% (range, 0% to 50%), from 14.4 +/- 8.4 mm to 10.4 +/- 7 mm, and tumor volume decreased by a mean of 44% (range, 0% to 76%), from 2536 mm3 (range, 115-7737 mm(3)) to 1461 mm(3) (range, 63-6217 mm(3)) (both P<.015). Symptom scores and lipid levels significantly improved. In the 26 patients, glucose metabolism deteriorated in 3 (12%) and improved in 4 (15%). New biliary alterations appeared in 26%. Pituitary function and safety parameters did not change.

CONCLUSIONS

Lanreotide Autogel treatment, titrated for optimal hormonal control, effectively controls IGF-1 and growth hormone levels, shrinks tumors, reduces acromegalic symptoms, and is well tolerated.

Efficacy of the new long-acting formulation of lanreotide (lanreotide Autogel) in somatostatin analogue-naive patients with acromegaly

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate efficacy and safety of lanreotide autogel (ATG) 120 mg injections every 4-8 weeks in somatostatin analogue-naïve patients with acromegaly.

DESIGN

Open, non-comparative, phase III, multicenter clinical study.

METHODS

Fifty-one patients (28 women, aged 19-78 yr): 39 newly diagnosed (de novo) and 12 who had previously undergone unsuccessful surgery (post-op, 11 macro and 1 micro) were studied. ATG 120 mg was initially given every 8 weeks for 24 weeks and subsequently changed according to GH levels: if <or=2.5 microg/l every 8 weeks (group A, 17 patients); if 2.5-5 microg/l every 6 weeks (group B, 15 patients); and if >5 microg/l every 4 weeks (group C, 19 patients). Treatment duration was 48-52 weeks. The primary objective was to control GH and IGF-I levels (GH<or=2.5 microg/l and IGF-I normalized for age/gender). Secondary objectives were to assess GH, IGF-I, and acid-labile subunit (ALS) decrease, improvement of clinical symptoms and quality of life (QoL).

RESULTS

GH levels normalized in 32 patients (63%), similarly in de novo and post-op patients (72% vs 50%, p=0.48); in 100% of group A, in 73% of group B and in 21% of group C (p<0.0001). IGF-I levels normalized in 19 patients (37%), similarly in the de novo and post-op patients (33% vs 50%, p=0.48): in 65% of group A, 33% of group B, and in 16% of group C. Circulating GH levels decreased by 80+/-17%, IGF-I levels by 44+/-27%, and ALS by 30+/-17%. Symptoms (hyperhidrosis (68.6%), swelling (68.6%), asthenia (58.8%), spine arthralgia (54.9%), and paresthesias (52.9%) and QoL (from 9.1+/-7.9 to 6.1+/-6.6) significantly improved (p<0.001). No patient withdrew from the study because of adverse events (AE). The most frequent AE was diarrhea (76.2% of patients): at study end 16 mild and 1 moderate diarrhea were recorded. Gallstones developed in 12% of patients.

CONCLUSION

ATG 120 mg in somatostatin-naïve patients with acromegaly controls GH secretion in 63% and IGF-I secretion in 37% during a 48-52 week period without any difference between de novo and post-op patients. The treatment was associated with improvement in clinical symptoms and QoL and with a good, safe profile.

Efficacy of long-term lanreotide treatment in patients with acromegaly

We investigated the effectiveness of lanreotide for the treatment of active acromegaly in a retrospectively multicenter case series including 53 patients (24 male, 29 female; mean age at diagnosis, 49.5 +/- 13.9 years) with acromegaly treated with lanreotide in nine different centers. Mean tumor diameter was 20 +/- 13 mm; mean basal levels of growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) were 21.3 +/- 26.3 and 579 +/- 177 mug/l, respectively. The primary mode of treatment was surgery in 70% of patients. Twenty-nine patients received only lanreotide (Prolonged Release, Autogel), whereas 24 subjects were also treated with octreotide at another treatment stage. Primary therapy with lanreotide was administered in five patients. Maximal monthly dose of lanreotide Autogel (n = 44) was 60 mg in 45%, 90 mg in 26%, 120 mg in 21% and 180 mg in 8%. During 36 months of lanreotide treatment, mean IGF-I levels decreased from 443 +/- 238 to 276 +/- 147 mug/l (P < 0.001), and mean GH levels, from 5.2 +/- 6.4 to 3.2 +/- 3.0 mug/l (P < 0.001). IGF-I levels normalized in 51% of patients and decreased by >50% towards normal in 32%; the normalization rate was higher in women (65%) than men (33%, P = 0.04). Safe random GH levels (</=2 mug/l) were achieved in 49% of patients. Both IGF-I normalization and safe GH levels were reached in 32% of the cohort. Lanreotide is an effective treatment for active acromegaly. Female sex was associated with higher rates of IGF-I normalization.

Octreotide LAR for the treatment of acromegaly

BACKGROUND

Somatostatin analogs previously considered as adjuvant therapy in acromegaly are increasingly used as a first-line therapy in selected cases.

OBJECTIVE

To review the octreotide LAR pharmacological and clinical data, and discuss the impact of this agent on current treatment regimens.

METHODS

We reviewed PubMed publications since the first use of octreotide LAR in acromegaly, and historical articles related to the discovery and development of this molecule. We chose, for efficacy and safety data, reviews, clinical and randomized controlled trials that included >or=10 patients.

RESULTS/CONCLUSION

Octreotide LAR controls acromegaly in approximately 50-60% of patients by inhibiting GH and IGF-I secretion, and by reducing tumor size. This drug is well tolerated in most patients.

Therapeutic options in the management of acromegaly: focus on lanreotide Autogel

BACKGROUND

In acromegaly, expert surgery is curative in only about 60% of patients. Postoperative radiation therapy is associated with a high incidence of hypopituitarism and its effect on growth hormone (GH) production is slow, so that adjuvant medical treatment becomes of importance in the management of many patients.

OBJECTIVE

To delineate the role of lanreotide in the treatment of acromegaly.

METHODS

Search of Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases for clinical studies of lanreotide in acromegaly.

RESULTS

Treatment with lanreotide slow release and lanreotide Autogel((R)) normalized GH and insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) concentrations in about 50% of patients. The efficacy of 120 mg lanreotide Autogel((R)) on GH and IGF-I levels was comparable with that of 20 mg octreotide LAR. There were no differences in improvement of cardiac function, decrease in pancreatic beta-cell function, or occurrence of side effects, including cholelithiasis, between octreotide LAR and lanreotide Autogel(R). When postoperative treatment with somatostatin analogs does not result in normalization of serum IGF-I and GH levels after noncurative surgery, pegvisomant alone or in combination with somatostatin analogs can control these levels in a substantial number of patients.