Fine-needle aspiration biopsy, ultrasound and BRAF(v600E) analysis - is this the best FNAB combination for most patients?

A tribute to Ernest L. Mazzaferri, MD and the lasting impact that he had on thyroid cancer care ten years after his death

This viewpoint highlights the contributions of Dr. Ernest Mazzaferri, a prominent figure in the field of thyroid cancer care, who made significant contributions to the diagnosis and treatment of this disease. Dr. Mazzaferri's first paper on thyroid cancer, published in 1977, established fundamental principles that remain fundamental to differentiated thyroid cancer management. He was an advocate of total thyroidectomy and of postoperative radioiodine therapy and contributed to improving thyroid fine needle aspiration techniques. Dr. Mazzaferri's leadership in developing guidelines for the management of thyroid cancer and thyroid nodules has been influential and widely accepted. His groundbreaking work established a systematic and data-driven approach to the diagnosis and treatment of thyroid cancer that continues to shape the field of thyroid cancer care today. This Viewpoint reflects on his lasting impact ten years after his death.

Extended Antitumor Response of a BRAF V600E Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma to Vemurafenib

Context

For patients with metastatic papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) refractory to radioactive iodine (RAI) treatment, systemic chemotherapy has limited efficacy. Such tumors frequently harbor BRAF V600E, and this alteration may predict responsiveness to vemurafenib treatment.

Objective

We report a metastatic PTC patient refractory to RAI treatment that underwent genomic profiling by next-generation sequencing. The sole genomic alteration identified was BRAF V600E on a near diploid genome with trisomy 1q. With vemurafenib treatment, the patient experienced a dramatic radiographic and clinical improvement, with the duration of an ongoing antitumor response exceeding 23 months.

Design

Hybridization capture of 3,769 exons of 236 cancer-related genes and the introns of 19 genes frequently rearranged in cancer was applied to >50 ng of DNA extracted from a formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded biopsy of a lymph node containing metastatic PTC and was sequenced to a high, uniform coverage of ×616.

Results

A BRAF V600E alteration was identified with no other somatic genomic alterations present within a near diploid tumor genome. The patient initially received vemurafenib at 960 mg twice daily that was reduced to 480 mg twice daily due to rash and diarrhea and has experienced an ongoing antitumor response exceeding 23 months by both PET-CT and dedicated CT imaging.

Conclusions

Genomic profiling in metastatic, RAI-refractory PTC can reveal a targetable BRAF V600E alteration without compounding somatic alterations, and such patients may derive a more prolonged benefit from vemurafenib treatment. Prospective clinical trials are ongoing to confirm our preliminary observation.

Is follow-up BRAF(V600E) mutation analysis helpful in the differential diagnosis of thyroid nodules with negative results on initial analysis?

Background

We evaluated the usefulness of follow-up BRAF^V600E mutation analysis using ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration (US-FNA) in diagnosis of thyroid nodules showing negative BRAFV600E mutation on prior analysis.

Methodology/Principal Finding

A total of 49 patients (men: 6, women: 43, mean age: 50.4 years) with 49 thyroid nodules were included. Patients had undergone initial and follow-up US-FNA and subsequent BRAF^V600E mutation analysis from US-FNA aspirates. All patients had negative results on initial BRAF^V600E mutation analysis. Clinicopathologic findings, US assessment, and BRAF^V600E mutation results were analyzed according to the final pathology. Of the 49 nodules, 12 (24.5%) were malignant and 37 (75.5%) were benign. Seven (58.3%) of the 12 malignant nodules were positive for BRAF^V600E mutation on follow-up, all showing suspicious US features. Initial US-FNA cytology of the 7 nodules were non-diagnostic (n = 2), benign (n = 2), or atypia (n = 3), while follow-up were benign (n = 1), indeterminate (n = 1), suspicious for malignancy (n = 4), and malignancy (n = 1).

Conclusions/Significance

Follow-up BRAF^V600E mutation analysis may be helpful in the diagnosis of selected thyroid nodules negative for BRAF^V600E mutation on initial analysis, which are assessed as suspicious malignant on US, diagnosed as non-diagnostic, benign or atypia on follow-up US-FNA.