Effects of tibolone or continuous combined oestradiol/norethisterone acetate on glucose and insulin metabolism

Counseling in menopausal women: How to address the benefits and risks of menopause hormone therapy. A FIGO position paper

Menopause marks the end of menstrual cyclicity and, depending on individual vulnerability, has several consequences related to gonadal steroid deprivation, especially if it is premature. Menopause may be more burdensome for some women than for others. Individual factors, such as personal history, socioeconomic status, ethnicity, and current health conditions, affect symptomatology and, thereby, the menopausal experience. In addition, some menopausal symptoms, such as severe hot flashes, sleep disorders, and depression, are markers of future health risks. Counseling is a fundamental part of health care in the peri- and postmenopause periods. It must include an assessment of the patient's symptoms, needs, desires, and risk profile to address the benefits and risks of menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) on an individual basis and promote a healthy lifestyle. Indeed, healthcare practitioners can and must protect the health and lives of mid-life women by increasing awareness of menopausal symptoms and ensuring healthcare options, especially MHT. The type and duration of MHT should be tailored based on the patient's history, menopausal age, physical characteristics, and current health status so that the benefits always outweigh the risks. This FIGO position paper focuses on the benefits and risks of MHT on health domains, target organs, and systems, and on systemic and vaginal MHT regimens, to provide indications that can be used in the clinical practice for menopausal counseling. Moreover, it offers insights into what FIGO considers the mainstay for the healthcare management of women in peri- and postmenopause, worldwide.

The influence of 17β-estradiol plus norethisterone acetate treatment on markers of glucose and insulin metabolism in women: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Objective

Despite the fact that some evidence suggests that the administration of 17β-estradiol plus norethisterone acetate influences glucose and insulin metabolism in women, these findings are still contradictory. Thus, we aimed to examine the impact of the co-administration of 17β-estradiol and norethisterone acetate on glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting glucose, insulin and C-peptide concentrations in females by means of a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Methods

We searched four databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science) using specific keywords and word combinations. The random-effects model (DerSimonian and Laird model) was employed to compute the weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the variations from baseline of HbA1c, fasting glucose, insulin, and C-peptide concentrations.

Results

In total, 14 RCTs were entered into the quantitative synthesis. The combined administration of 17β-estradiol and norethisterone acetate decreased HbA1c (WMD: -0.65%, 95% CI: -1.15 to -0.15; P=0.011), fasting glucose (WMD: -11.05 mg/dL, 95% CI: -16.6 to -5.5; P<0.001) and insulin (WMD: -1.35 mIU/L, 95% CI: -2.20 to -0.50; P=0.001) levels. C-peptide concentrations' declined only in females diagnosed with overweight/obesity or diabetes.

Conclusion

Evidence to date points out that the administration of 17β-estradiol and norethisterone acetate has a positive impact on glucose metabolism in women by reducing fasting glucose, HbA1c, and insulin values. Future studies need to confirm the potential benefits of this drug combination in the prevention and/or management of cardiometabolic disorders.

Menopausal hormone therapy and the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus: Health Insurance Database in South Korea-based retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

Menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) is known to reduce the incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM); however, since the Women's Health Initiative study, the types and doses of female hormones used for MHT have changed considerably. Therefore, this study was conducted to determine whether MHT, which is currently widely prescribed, increases the risk of T2DM.

METHOD

We performed a retrospective cohort study based on national health insurance data and cancer screening data from 2002 to 2019. We included the MHT group as postmenopausal women older than 40 years who used at least one MHT for at least 6 months between 2003 and 2011. We subclassified the MHT group into five categories; tibolone, combined estrogen plus progestin by the manufacturer (CEPM), oral estrogen, combined estrogen plus progestin by the physician (CEPP), and transdermal estrogen. We selected the non-MHT group as postmenopausal women who had never been prescribed MHT from 2002 to 2019. We compared the incidence of T2DM between the MHT group and the non-MHT group.

RESULTS

We enrolled 330,771 women in the MHT group and 798,550 women in the control group. T2DM was diagnosed in 15.2% of the non-MHT group, 16.6% of the tibolone group, 12.1% of the CEPM group, 16.6% of the oral estrogen group, 15.4% of the CEPP group, and 17% of the transdermal estrogen group. In Cox proportional hazard analysis adjusted for variable factors, tibolone, oral estrogen, CEPP, and transdermal estrogen increased the incidence of T2DM. In contrast, there was no change in the risk of T2DM in the CEPM group.

CONCLUSIONS

MHT, including tibolone, which is currently the most prescribed agent, increased the risk of T2DM; however, CEPM did not increase the risk of T2DM. Only tibolone increased the risk of T2DM in participants older than 70 years.

Hormone therapy in the postmenopausal years: considering benefits and risks in clinical practice

BACKGROUND

Menopausal symptoms can be very distressing and considerably affect a woman's personal and social life. It is becoming more and more evident that leaving bothersome symptoms untreated in midlife may lead to altered quality of life, reduced work productivity and, possibly, overall impaired health. Hormone therapy (HT) for the relief of menopausal symptoms has been the object of much controversy over the past two decades. At the beginning of the century, a shadow was cast on the use of HT owing to the concern for cardiovascular and cerebrovascular risks, and breast cancer, arising following publication of a large randomized placebo-controlled trial. Findings of a subanalysis of the trial data and extended follow-up studies, along with other more modern clinical trials and observational studies, have provided new evidence on the effects of HT.

OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE

The goal of the following paper is to appraise the most significant clinical literature on the effects of hormones in postmenopausal women, and to report the benefits and risks of HT for the relief of menopausal symptoms.

SEARCH METHODS

A Pubmed search of clinical trials was performed using the following terms: estrogens, progestogens, bazedoxifene, tibolone, selective estrogen receptor modulators, tissue-selective estrogen complex, androgens, and menopause.

OUTCOMES

HT is an effective treatment for bothersome menopausal vasomotor symptoms, genitourinary syndrome, and prevention of osteoporotic fractures. Women should be made aware that there is a small increased risk of stroke that tends to persist over the years as well as breast cancer risk with long-term estrogen-progestin use. However, healthy women who begin HT soon after menopause will probably earn more benefit than harm from the treatment. HT can improve bothersome symptoms, all the while conferring offset benefits such as cardiovascular risk reduction, an increase in bone mineral density and a reduction in bone fracture risk. Moreover, a decrease in colorectal cancer risk is obtainable in women treated with estrogen-progestin therapy, and an overall but nonsignificant reduction in mortality has been observed in women treated with conjugated equine estrogens alone or combined with estrogen-progestin therapy. Where possible, transdermal routes of HT administration should be preferred as they have the least impact on coagulation. With combined treatment, natural progesterone should be favored as it is devoid of the antiapoptotic properties of other progestogens on breast cells. When beginning HT, low doses should be used and increased gradually until effective control of symptoms is achieved. Unless contraindications develop, patients may choose to continue HT as long as the benefits outweigh the risks. Regular reassessment of the woman's health status is mandatory. Women with premature menopause who begin HT before 50 years of age seem to have the most significant advantage in terms of longevity.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS

In women with bothersome menopausal symptoms, HT should be considered one of the mainstays of treatment. Clinical practitioners should tailor HT based on patient history, physical characteristics, and current health status so that benefits outweigh the risks.

Effects of tibolone or continuous combined oestradiol and norethisterone acetate on lipids, high-density lipoprotein subfractions and apolipoproteins in postmenopausal women in a two-year, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effects of (a) tibolone, (b) continuous combined oestrogen plus progestogen and (c) placebo on plasma lipid and lipoprotein markers of cardiovascular risk in healthy postmenopausal women.

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized, single-centre, placebo-controlled, double-blind study.

PATIENTS

One hundred and one postmenopausal women were randomized (1:1:1) into one of three groups taking daily 2.5 mg tibolone, continuous oral oestradiol-17β 2 mg plus norethisterone acetate 1 mg daily (E₂ /NETA) or placebo.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Fasting serum lipid, lipoprotein and apolipoprotein concentrations measured at baseline and after 6, 12 and 24 months of treatment.

RESULTS

Both tibolone and E₂ /NETA lowered plasma total cholesterol concentrations relative to placebo. With tibolone, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) was reduced (-27% at 24 months, P < .001), the greatest effect being in the cholesterol-enriched HDL₂ subfraction (-40%, P < .001). Tibolone's effect on HDL concentrations was also apparent in the principal HDL protein component, apolipoprotein AI (-29% at 24 months, P < .001). However, there was no significant effect of tibolone on low-density or very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C and VLDL-C, respectively). By contrast, the greatest reduction in cholesterol with E₂ /NETA was in LDL-C (-22% at 24 months, P = .008). E₂ /NETA reduced HDL-C to a lesser extent than tibolone (-12% at 24 months, P < .001). Effects on HDL apolipoproteins were similarly diminished relative to tibolone. E₂ /NETA had no effect on VLDL-C or on the protein component of LDL, apolipoprotein B.

CONCLUSION

Tibolone reduces serum HDL. E₂ /NETA reduces LDL cholesterol but not apolipoprotein B, suggesting decreased cholesterol loading of LDL. Any impact these changes may have on CVD risk needs further investigation.