Neuropeptides in nasal mucosa

Inflammatory mediators in nasal secretions of patients with nasal polyposis with and without aspirin sensitivity

BACKGROUND

The aim of this cross-sectional study was to compare the levels of inflammatory mediators in nasal secretions in patients with aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD) and in those with nasal polyposis (NP) without aspirin-sensitivity and to correlate nasal fluid mediator concentrations with clinical parameters of the disease.

METHODS

A total of 30 patients with AERD, 30 chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) with NP patients without aspirin sensitivity (CRSwNP), and 30 control subjects without inflammation of the nasal mucosa (C), selected for surgical treatment entered the study. The total nasal symptom score (TNSS), endoscopic score (ES), and Lund-Mackay score (LMS), were evaluated. The concentrations of eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), tryptase, heat shock protein 70 (HSP70), substance P and Clara cell protein 16 (CC16) were determined in nasal secretions.

RESULTS

Higher concentrations of ECP, tryptase, and HSP70 were measured in the AERD patients than in the CRSwNP patients and the C group (p < .001; p < .001, respectively for all mediators). However, levels of CC16 were higher in the C group than in the AERD and CRSwNP groups (p < .001; p < .001, respectively). A positive correlation between the TNSS and CC16 and a negative one between CC16 and tryptase levels were found in the C group. The CRSwNP group showed positive correlations between ECP, HSP70, and tryptase and negative correlations between substance P, ES, and LMS, as well as between CC16 and tryptase levels. In the AERD group, we found a positive correlation between HSP70 and ECP levels and a negative correlation between the TNSS and CC16 concentration.

CONCLUSION

The obtained results indicate the increased production of mediators of eosinophil and mast cell function, and the decreased production of biomarker of respiratory epithelial function in AERD patients. Clinical and biochemical parameters correlate in different ways in the AERD and CRSwNP patients.

Evaluation of substance P and bradykinin levels in nasal secretions of patients with nasal polyposis with and without sensitivity to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

Objective

The role of neurogenic inflammation in pathogenesis of chronic rhinitis is well known. However, very little is known about its importance in pathogenesis of nasal polyposis (NP), especially in form of NP which appears as a part of aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD). The aim of this study was to examine the concentrations of neuropeptides substance P (SP) and bradykinin (BK) in nasal secretions of patients with NP.

Methods

Fourteen patients with NP as a part of AERD with mild persistent asthma, 14 patients with NP without aspirin sensitivity, and 14 control subjects without nasal inflammation (C) entered this cross-sectional study. Clinical parameters (symptoms, endoscopic, and radiological findings) were assessed. The concentrations of SP and BK were measured in the nasal secretion samples using commercial human enzyme immunoassay kits.

Results

The concentration of SP in nasal secretions was significantly higher in NP patients without aspirin sensitivity and AERD patients compared to controls (p = .022; p < .0001, respectively), but higher in AERD than in non-AERD patients (p = .018). The level of BK in nasal fluid was higher in non-AERD and AERD NP patients than in controls (p < .0001; p < .0001, respectively), but also higher in AERD than in non-AERD patients (p < .0001). We found high positive correlations between BK in nasal fluid and Lund-Mackay computed tomography (CT) score in both non-AERD and AERD groups of NP patients.

Conclusion

Our results suggest more intense release of SP and BK from the nasal mucosa in patients with AERD than in patients with NP who do not have aspirin sensitivity. The strong correlation between concentration of BK in nasal secretions and CT score suggests that BK in nasal fluid could be used as a marker for disease severity as measured by the Lund-Mackay score.

Involvement of galanin and galanin receptor 2 in a mouse model of allergic rhinitis

BACKGROUND

Allergic rhinitis (AR) is caused by allergic reaction to allergens such as pollen. Galanin (GAL), a neuropeptide that regulates inflammatory processes, is widely expressed in the central and peripheral nervous systems. Although neuropeptides are implicated in arthritis and chemically induced ileitis, their roles in AR remain unclear.

METHODS

We developed a murine model of AR and generated control, systemic sensitization, mild AR, and severe AR groups. We examined GAL and GAL receptor (GALR) mRNA and protein levels and localization patterns in each group using reverse transcription PCR, western blotting, and immunohistochemical analyses. Additionally, we evaluated the effects of M871, a GALR2 antagonist, on mice with severe AR.

RESULTS

Gal and Galr2 are expressed in nasal mucosa and brain (control) samples from control and AR mice. GAL and GALR2 were expressed at similar levels and localized to ciliated epithelial and submucosal gland cells of the nasal mucosa in all four groups. Intranasal M871 administration significantly reduced the incidence of nose rubbing behaviors and sneezing (p < 0.001 in 30 min, respectively) in severe AR mice relative to that in controls. Mechanistically, we postulate that GALR2 is expressed in B cells, and M871 administration reduces IgE production, as well as the number of B cells in tissues.

CONCLUSIONS

GAL signaling may not change progressively with increasing nasal sensitization, suggesting that this signaling process exacerbates, rather than directly trigger, AR. GAL-GALR2 signaling likely mediates AR development, suggesting that its inhibition represents a novel therapeutic strategy for AR.

Gastrin-Releasing Peptide Is Involved in the Establishment of Allergic Rhinitis in Mice

OBJECTIVE

Gastrin-releasing peptide (GRP) is a neuropeptide that targets transmembrane-type receptors. Its role in allergic rhinitis (AR) has yet to be investigated. The present study utilized the nasal mucosa of AR model mice to examine GRP and GRP receptor (GRPR) expression levels, localization, and other factors to evaluate their role in AR pathology.

STUDY DESIGN

In vivo study in an animal model.

METHODS

GRP and GRPR expression levels were examined in three different AR models established in BALB/c mice. In addition, a GRPR antagonist (RC-3095) was administered to AR mice to investigate its effect. The distribution of GRPR expression on mast cells in the nasal mucosa with AR was examined. Finally, we investigated the inhibitory effect of RC-3095 on allergy symptoms induced by histamine.

RESULTS

GRP and GRPR were highly expressed in the nasal mucosal epithelium and interstitial tissues surrounding the nasal glands in AR groups according to immunostaining. GRP and GRPR expression as determined by western blotting increased in the nasal mucosa as the degree of nasal sensitization increased. In addition, the average counts of sneezing and nasal rubbing after treatment in the AR + RC-3095 group were significantly lower than those in the AR + nasal saline group. Mast cells often colocalized with GRPR around nasal glands. Moreover, RC-3095 was effective in reducing sneezing induced by histamine.

CONCLUSION

The GRP-GRPR system is likely to be involved in allergic inflammation. This system may represent a novel therapeutic target for refractory AR.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

NA. Laryngoscope, E377-E384, 2018.

Vasoactive intestinal polypeptide as mediator of asthma

Vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) is one of the most abundant, biologically active peptides found in the human lung. VIP is a likely neurotransmitter or neuromodulator of the inhibitory non-adrenergic non-cholinergic airway nervous system and influences many aspects of pulmonary biology. In human airways VIP-immunoreactive nerve fibres are present in the tracheobronchial airway smooth muscle layer, the walls of pulmonary and bronchial vessels and around submucosal glands. Next to its prominent bronchodilatory effects, VIP potently relaxes pulmonary vessels. The precise role of VIP in the pathogenesis of asthma is still uncertain. Although a therapy using the strong bronchodilatory effects of VIP would offer potential benefits, the rapid inactivation of the peptide by airway peptidases has prevented effective VIP-based drugs so far and non-peptide VIP-agonists did not reach clinical use.

Efficacy of azelastine nasal spray in the treatment of vasomotor (perennial nonallergic) rhinitis

BACKGROUND

Azelastine hydrochloride is an antihistamine with anti-inflammatory properties that is available in the United States in a nasal spray formulation for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis. Vasomotor (perennial nonallergic) rhinitis (VMR) is a noninfectious, chronic rhinitis usually not associated with inflammatory cell infiltration.

OBJECTIVE

Two multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group clinical trials were conducted to determine whether patients with symptoms of VMR (rhinorrhea, sneezing, postnasal drip, and nasal congestion) could be effectively treated with azelastine nasal spray.

METHODS

All of the patients who participated in the trials had a diagnosis of VMR, symptoms for at least 1 year, negative skin tests for a mixed panel of seasonal and perennial allergens, and a nasal cytology examination negative for eosinophils. After a 1-week, single-blind, placebo lead-in period, patients who met the symptom severity qualification criteria were randomized to receive either azelastine nasal spray (two sprays per nostril twice daily, 1.1 mg/day) or placebo nasal spray for 21 days. Patients recorded the severity of their VMR symptoms on diary cards each morning and evening of the trial using a four-point symptom rating scale (0 = none to 3 = severe). The primary efficacy variable was the overall reduction from baseline in the total vasomotor rhinitis symptom score (TVRSS) over the 21-day, double-blind treatment period.

RESULTS

In both studies, azelastine nasal spray significantly (study 1, P = .002; study 2, P = .005) reduced the TVRSS from baseline when compared with placebo. Significant improvement was observed within the first week and improvement in all symptoms favored treatment with azelastine nasal spray. No serious or unexpected adverse events were reported in either study. Bitter taste (19% vs 2%) was the only adverse experience that occurred with a statistically significantly greater incidence in the azelastine group than in the placebo group.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first demonstration of the efficacy of an antihistamine in the therapy of VMR in two double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials.

Distribution and quantity of neuroendocrine markers in allergic rhinitis

Neuroendocrine components exist in the human nasal mucosa. However, the pathophysiological and neuroimmunological roles of the regulatory peptides in allergic rhinitis (AR) require further investigation. To analyse the functional morphology and quantify the tissue concentration of regulatory peptides in the nasal mucosa of AR subjects, human inferior turbinate mucosa specimens from 25 patients with AR, 20 patients with non-allergic rhinitis and 10 patients without any nasal diseases were investigated. Using immunohistochemistry and radioimmunoassays, we detected the presence, distribution and concentrations of various neuropeptides [vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP), neuropeptide Y (NPY), substance P (SP) and calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP)] and general neuroendocrine markers (neuron-specific enolase and chromogranin A). Quantitative analysis of the stained fibres and cells was performed using a graphic AutoCAD program. The presence and distribution of NPY, CGRP and SP nerve fibres and neuroendocrine cells were similar among the three subject groups. AR subjects had significantly higher tissue concentrations of VIP and SP. AR subjects had increased numbers of VIP fibres which predominantly innervated vessels. Thus, VIP and SP play important neuroimmunological roles in the pathogenesis of AR.

Neuropeptide innervation and neuroendocrine cells in allergic rhinitis and chronic hypertrophic rhinitis

BACKGROUND

The neuropeptides and neuroendocrine cells are proven to exist in the human nasal mucosa. However, the pathophysiological and neuroimmunological roles of regulatory peptides in human nasal diseases require further investigation.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate and compare the functional morphology and quantify the tissue concentration of regulatory peptides in the nasal mucosas of normal, allergic rhinitis (AR) and chronic hypertrophic rhinitis (CHR) subjects.

METHODS

Human inferior turbinate mucosa specimens from 28 patients with AR, 25 patients with CHR and 15 patients without any nasal diseases were investigated. Using immunohistochemistry and radioimmunoassays, we detected the presence, distribution and concentrations of various neuropeptides (vasoactive intestinal peptides [VIP], neuropeptide Y [NPY], substance P [SP], calcitonin gene-related peptides [CGRP]) and general neuroendocrine markers (neurone-specific enolase, chromogranin A and somatostatin). Quantitative analysis of the stained fibres and cells were performed using a graphic AutoCAD program.

RESULTS

The presence and distribution of NPY, CGRP, and SP nerve fibres and neuroendocrine cells were similar among the three subject groups. AR subjects had significantly higher VIP and SP tissue concentrations. VIP fibres had highest density in AR subjects and these fibers predominantly innervated vessels. In CHR, VIP fibres primarily innervated glands.

CONCLUSIONS

VIP and SP may play an important neuroimmunological role in the pathogenesis of AR. VIP may lead to the hypertrophic changes of submucosal glands in the pathogenesis of CHR.

The link between the nose and lung, perennial rhinitis and asthma--is it the same disease?

Perennial rhinitis and asthma are clinical syndromes representing a range of overlapping pathologies; accurate classification should therefore precede any comparison. Although the sinonasal cavities, trachea and bronchi have a common respiratory mucosa, there are also anatomical differences. For example, the nose has a capacitance vessel network and the lower airways possess smooth muscle, both of which are responsive to neurohumoral influences. The prevalence of rhinitis and asthma has increased over the last three decades. Rhinitis occurs in around 75% of allergic asthmatics while 20% of perennial allergic rhinitics develop asthma. Eosinophils, and their associated proteins and cytokines, may play a central role in both perennial rhinitis and asthma with and without atopy. The characteristic pathology of asthma can be summarized as a chronic, desquamating, eosinophilic bronchitis. Non-allergic rhinitis with eosinophilia is recognized, but without consistent evidence of epithelial damage. Eosinophils are also present in rhinosinusitis with polyposis, particularly in patients with aspirin sensitivity, in whom asthma also often occurs. Increased mast cell activation and mediator release is evident in both perennial rhinitis and asthma following allergen challenge. The importance of mast cells in non-atopic asthma and polyposis is also recognized. Adhesion molecules may also be upregulated, with an increased number and activation of TH2 lymphocytes. However, allergen-resultant T-cell activation may be less marked in the nose than in the lung. Autonomic imbalance also plays a role in both conditions via changes in neural tone to effector tissues, release of neuropeptides, and interplay with cellular recruitment. Pharmacological manipulation of rhinitis and asthma also illustrates the pathological similarities and differences.