Cell block preparation as an adjunctive tool after fine-needle aspiration cytology for screening oral and maxillofacial diseases

OBJECTIVE

To describe the use of cell block (CB) preparation from fine-needle aspiration cytology for diagnosing oral and maxillofacial diseases.

STUDY DESIGN

We performed a retrospective analysis of 568 samples collected by our laboratory for CB preparation from fine-needle aspiration cytology of the oral and maxillofacial region between January 2001 and October 2021. We performed cytologic diagnoses and compared them with the available histopathologic diagnoses to calculate the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of CB preparation for identifying malignant lesions.

RESULTS

The most frequent diagnosis was pleomorphic adenoma (n = 44, 7.7%), followed by metastatic squamous-cell carcinoma (n = 28, 4.9%) and odontogenic keratocyst (n = 26, 4.6%). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of CB preparation, which revealed detailed morphologic and architectural patterns, were 70.0%, 100.0%, 100.0%, 62.5%, and 80.0%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Cell block preparation from fine-needle aspiration cytology of the oral and maxillofacial region may be a useful adjunctive diagnostic tool for diagnosing oral and maxillofacial diseases because it reveals morphologic and architectural patterns similar to those shown on histopathologic slides, leading to the better categorization of diseases.

Diagnostic Value of Preparing Additional Liquid-Based Cytology Slides and Cell Blocks from Residue Material in Thyroid fine Needle Aspiration

Background and Aims

After liquid-based cytology (LBC) technique developed for cervical cytology, it has been used for nongynecological samples and has been very successful. It offers having extra slides of the samples for further examination and ancillary tests. Moreover, cell blocks can be formed from the residue material. The study aimed to evaluate the importance of preparing a second LBC slide or a cell block from the residue material of thyroid fine needle aspiration (FNA) samples to reach a definitive diagnosis in cases diagnosed as nondiagnostic (ND) after the first slide.

Material and Methods

Seventy five cases diagnosed as ND after the first slide were included in study. For 50 cases, the second LBC slides were prepared (LBC group); for 25 cases, cell block was performed from residue material (CB group). Two groups were compared in terms of reaching a definitive diagnosis.

Results

At the end of secondary procedures, a definitive diagnosis was reached in a total of 24 cases (32%). Twenty of 50 cases (40%) in LBC group reached a definitive diagnosis while four cases (16%) in the CB group reached a definitive diagnosis. Achieving a definitive diagnosis was found statistically higher in the LBC group in which the second slide was formed compared to the CB group (P =0.036).

Conclusion

Preparing a second slide with LBC method is more purposive than preparing a cell block from the residue material of thyroid FNA samples. Reducing the percentage of ND cases will protect patients from complications and morbidity that may arise from repeated FNA.

An audit of cytopathology in the oral and maxillofacial region: 18 years of experience

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to perform an audit of oral and maxillofacial specimens submitted for cytological diagnosis to verify the importance of this complementary examination.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of our institutional cytopathology database was performed over an 18-year period. Clinical information and cytological data were collected. Associations between independent variables and outcomes were assessed using the Pearson χ² test or Fisher's test, with a 5% significance level. When available, the histological diagnosis was compared with cytological diagnosis to identify the percentage of agreement and the specificity, sensitivity and accuracy of cytology in identifying malignant neoplasms.

RESULTS

A total of 1082 cases were identified, which included 65 different cytological diagnoses. Exfoliative cytology (EC) was performed in 312 cases (29.1%) and fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) in 770 cases (70.9%). EC was mainly employed to diagnose oral infectious diseases (P < 0.001) and FNAC to diagnose neoplasms, cystic, reactive and miscellaneous lesions (P < 0.001). Cell-block was performed in 555 FNAC cases (51.3%). Panoptic, Papanicolaou and haematoxylin-eosin staining were performed in FNAC and periodic acid-Schiff in EC (P < 0.001). In 211 cases (19.5%), the histological diagnosis was available and the percentage agreement with the cytological diagnosis was 41.2%. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy to identify malignant neoplasms were 84.6%, 100%, 100%, 77.8% and 90.0%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

EC was mainly performed for diagnosis of infectious diseases and FNAC for diagnosis of salivary gland tumours, odontogenic lesions, reactive lesions and cervical metastasis.

Pitfalls in Thyroid Cytopathology

Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) is among the first diagnostic tools used in the evaluation of thyroid nodules. It has the ability to triage patients with benign and malignant lesions, thus defining the optimum clinical and/or surgical management. The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology has found worldwide acceptance. Thyroid FNA offers high positive predictive value (97%-99%), with sensitivities and specificities of 65% to 99% and 72% to 100%, respectively. Nonetheless, many potential diagnostic pitfalls exist that can lead to false-positive and/or false-negative results. This article discusses several of the potential pitfalls in the cytologic evaluation of thyroid lesions.

Assessment of cell block technique in head and neck pathology diagnoses: A preliminary study

OBJECTIVE

The head and neck region is a composite site made of multiple tissue components. These tissues when affected by disease or pathology present with an array of changes in the tissue architecture and pattern. It is essential to visualize the cellular details and tissue patterns for accurate diagnosis and treatment planning. Aspiration cytology primarily makes use of the cellular details for diagnosing lesions of the head and neck. Despite the promising results, its use is still limited in certain cases of the head and neck. The reason implicated could be the indiscernible appearance of cells in the absence of tissue integrity. In this regard, cell blocks are known to facilitate the visualization of the cytomorphological as well as the tissue arrangement patterns. Thus, the present study was designed to evaluate the role of cell block cytology in the diagnosis of various lesions of the head and neck.

METHODS

Odontogenic lesions, epithelial carcinomas and connective tissue pathology of the head and neck origin were included in the study (n = 45). Aspiration cytology smears and cell block diagnosis were compared with tissue biopsy diagnosis for determining their sensitivity (%) and diagnostic efficacy.

RESULTS

Cell blocks showed distinct preservation of the architectural pattern. In case of fluid-filled lesions, the contents were preserved and correlated with the tissue biopsy results. The results of cell blocks were similar to that of tissue biopsy in majority of the cases (95.56%).

CONCLUSION

We recommend using cell blocks as a part of routine laboratory practice for all head-neck cases.

Diagnostic value of liquid-based cytology with fine needle aspiration specimens for cervical lymphadenopathy

Background

Cervical lymphadenopathy is a symptom that is frequently seen among outpatients, and it is important to differentiate malignant lesions from reactive lymphoid hyperplasia. Fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology has been widely used for the diagnosis of cervical lymphadenopathy. However, some limitations of the diagnostic accuracy using conventional smear (CS) cytology have been pointed out. The diagnostic value of liquid‐based cytology (LBC) with FNA specimens has not yet been fully proven.

Methods

Forty‐two patients with cervical lymphadenopathy who underwent FNA with CS cytology from 2007 to 2011 and 123 patients who underwent FNA with LBC utilizing LBCPREP2™ from 2011 to 2015 were studied. Diagnostic values were compared between the CS and the LBC groups.

Results

Of the total 165 patients representing the combined CS and LBC groups, 81 (49.1%) were diagnosed as benign lymph node and 84 (50.9%) were malignant diseases including 37 (22.4%) of metastatic carcinoma except for thyroid carcinoma, 30 (18.2%) of metastatic thyroid carcinoma, and 17 (10.3%) of malignant lymphoma. The overall statistical values including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of the CS were 75%, 100%, 100%, 78.9%, and 87.1%, respectively, whereas those values for LBC were 91.2%, 100%, 100%, 90.7%, and 95.3%, respectively. The sensitivity of LBC for malignant diseases tended to be higher than that of CS cytology (p = 0.081).

Conclusion

LBC with FNA specimens from cervical lymphadenopathy is a useful and reliable method for the diagnosis of malignant diseases, especially of metastatic carcinomas, due to its increased sensitivity compared with CS cytology. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2016;44:169–176. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.