Critical review of clinical practice guidelines for evaluation of neck mass in adults

Objective

Several clinical practice guidelines have been produced and disseminated for the evaluation of a neck mass. However, to date, the quality and methodologic rigor of these clinical practice guidelines have not been appraised. Therefore, this study set out to identify and assess the methodologic quality of national and international guidelines for the evaluation and management of neck masses in adults.

Methods

We conducted a comprehensive search of EMBASE, MEDLINE/PubMed, SCOPUS and grey literature sources until September 2020. The quality of these guidelines was assessed by four reviewers using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation, 2nd edition (AGREE II). Domain scores were considered acceptable quality if they scored >60%, and Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC) were calculated to assess agreement among the appraisers.

Results

Seven guidelines were assessed for evaluation. Among these, only the American Academy of Otolaryngology (AAO), Cancer Care Manitoba (CCMB), and the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) achieved an overall rating of “high”. The remaining four guidelines achieved ratings of either “average” or “low”. The “Scope and Purpose” domain achieved the highest mean score (94.4% ± 5.0%), and lowest was “Applicability” (51.5% ± 29.2%). ICC analysis showed substantial to very good agreement across all domains (0.75–0.98).

Conclusion

These findings highlight the variability in methodologic quality of guidelines for the evaluation and management of adult neck mass. The results from this analysis highlight the need to improve guidelines development process for this topic and may guide the selection and use of these guidelines in clinical practice.

Rapid on-site assessment of specimens by biomedical scientists improves the quality of head and neck fine needle aspiration cytology

OBJECTIVE

Immediate rapid on-site assessment (ROSA) of fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) specimens by biomedical scientists (BMS), the UK equivalent of cytotechnologists, or by pathologists may improve specimen quality and cellular adequacy rates for lymph node, head and neck and thyroid FNAC. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of introducing ROSA by BMS in an outpatient clinic setting.

METHODS

The adequacy rate and sensitivity of histological diagnosis for lymph node, thyroid and salivary gland FNAC samples were determined before and after the introduction of BMS ROSA. The additional financial costs and time required to perform this service were also estimated.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients underwent ultrasound (US)-guided FNAC with ROSA and 151 without. ROSA reduced the number of FNAC insufficient in quality for diagnosis from 43% to 19% (P = 0.0194). The estimated additional cost for pathology per patient for ROSA was between £52.05 and £70.74, equivalent to €65.40/US $83.90 and €88.89/US $114.0, respectively, an increase of between 28% and 49% from the original cost. ROSA necessitated an additional 6 minutes clinic time per patient, reducing the number of patients that could be seen in an average clinic from 13 to 10 as well as requiring increased laboratory time for FNAC slide assessment.

CONCLUSION

ROSA by suitably trained biomedical scientists and with appropriate consultant pathologist support can improve the quality of FNAC sampling for head and neck lesions. Although ROSA resulted in both additional financial and time costs, these are more than likely to be offset by a reduction in patients returning to clinic for repeat FNAC or undergoing unnecessary surgery.

A simplified economic approach to thyroid FNA cytology and surgical intervention in thyroid nodules

Objective

Few studies have modelled the economics of thyroid FNA.

Methods

A simple spreadsheet economic model for delivery of thyroid fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology is described using the UK Royal College of Pathologists’ Classification for thyroid FNA which is based on The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology.

Results

We show an estimated 27.8% cost treatment reduction per patient if low rates of non-diagnostic for cytological diagnosis (Thy 1) and neoplasm possible atypia/non-diagnostic (Thy 3a) are achieved, which require rapid onsite FNA adequacy assessment of aspiration samples. If we assume that the number of thyroid FNAs performed in the UK annually is around 500 per million, and the UK population is 62 million, this could save the UK National Health Service significant sums, as the additional cost per patient treated in this model varies from £781 for a scenario with ultrasound guided FNA and inclinic cell adequacy assessment to £998 where aspirates are taken in conventional fashion without any inclinic adequacy assessment.

Conclusions

This model makes a strong economic case for the introduction of rapid onsite assessment of thyroid FNA across cancer networks, to improve the diagnostic efficacy of thyroid FNA.

BSCC Code of Practice--fine needle aspiration cytology

The British Society for Clinical Cytology Code of Practice on fine needle aspiration cytology complements that on exfoliative cytopathology, which was published in the last issue (Cytopathology 2009;20:211-23). Both have been prepared with wide consultation within and outside the BSCC and have been endorsed by the Royal College of Pathologists. A separate code of practice for gynaecological cytopathology is in preparation. Fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology is an accepted first line investigation for mass lesions, which may be targeted by palpation or a variety of imaging methods. Although FNA cytology has been shown to be a cost-effective, reliable technique its accurate interpretation depends on obtaining adequately cellular samples prepared to a high standard. Its accuracy and cost-effectiveness can be seriously compromised by inadequate samples. Although cytopathologists, radiologists, nurses or clinicians may take FNAs, they must be adequately trained, experienced and subject to regular audit. The best results are obtained when a pathologist or an experienced and trained biomedical scientist (cytotechnologist) provides immediate on-site assessment of sample adequacy whether or not the FNA requires image-guidance. This COP provides evidence-based recommendations for setting up FNA services, managing the patients, taking the samples, preparing the slides, collecting material for ancillary tests, providing rapid on-site assessment, classifying the diagnosis and providing a final report. Costs, cost-effectiveness and rare complications are taken into account as well as the time and resources required for quality control, audit and correlation of cytology with histology and outcome. Laboratories are expected to have an effective quality management system conforming to the requirements of a recognised accreditation scheme such as Clinical Pathology Accreditation (UK) Ltd.