Fine needle aspiration biopsy of hepatocellular carcinoma and hepatocellular nodular lesions: role, controversies and approach to diagnosis

WFUMB Review Paper. Incidental Findings in Otherwise Healthy Subjects, How to Manage: Liver

An incidental focal liver lesion (IFLL) is defined as a hepatic lesion identified in a patient imaged for an unrelated reason. They are frequently encountered in daily practice, sometimes leading to unnecessary, invasive and potentially harmful follow-up investigations. The clinical presentation and the imaging aspects play an important role in deciding if, and what further evaluation, is needed. In low-risk patients (i.e., without a history of malignant or chronic liver disease or related symptoms), especially in those younger than 40 years old, more than 95% of IFLLs are likely benign. Shear Wave liver Elastography (SWE) of the surrounding liver parenchyma should be considered to exclude liver cirrhosis and for further risk stratification. If an IFLL in a low-risk patient has a typical appearance on B-mode ultrasound of a benign lesion (e.g., simple cyst, calcification, focal fatty change, typical hemangioma), no further imaging is needed. Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) should be considered as the first-line contrast imaging modality to differentiate benign from malignant IFLLs, since it has a similar accuracy to contrast-enhanced (CE)-MRI. On CEUS, hypoenhancement of a lesion in the late vascular phase is characteristic for malignancy. CE-CT should be avoided for characterizing probable benign FLL and reserved for staging once a lesion is proven malignant. In high-risk patients (i.e., with chronic liver disease or an oncological history), each IFLL should initially be considered as potentially malignant, and every effort should be made to confirm or exclude malignancy. US-guided biopsy should be considered in those with unresectable malignant lesions, particularly if the diagnosis remains unclear, or when a specific tissue diagnosis is needed.

Subtype prediction of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma using dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound

OBJECTIVE

The study aimed to investigate the predictive value of dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (DCE-US) in differentiating small-duct (SD) and large-duct (LD) types of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC).

METHODS

This study retrospectively enrolled 110 patients with pathologically confirmed ICC lesions who were subject to preoperative contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) examinations between January 2022 and February 2023. Patients were further classified according to the subtype: SD-type and LD-type, and an optimal predictive model was established and validated using the above pilot cohort. The test cohort, consisting of 48 patients prospectively enrolled from March 2023 to September 2023, was evaluated.

RESULTS

In the pilot cohort, compared with SD-type ICCs, more LD-type ICCs showed elevated carcinoembryonic antigen (p < 0.001), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (p = 0.004), ill-defined margin (p = 0.018), intrahepatic bile duct dilation (p < 0.001). Among DCE-US quantitative parameters, the wash-out area under the curve (WoAUC), wash-in and wash-out area under the curve (WiWoAUC), and fall time (FT) at the margin of lesions were higher in the SD-type group (all p < 0.05). Meanwhile, the mean transit time (mTT) and wash-out rate (WoR) at the margin of the lesion were higher in the LD-type group (p = 0.041 and 0.007, respectively). Logistic regression analysis showed that intrahepatic bile duct dilation, mTT, and WoR were significant predictive factors for predicting ICC subtypes, and the AUC of the predictive model achieved 0.833 in the test cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative DCE-US has the potential to become a novel complementary method for predicting the pathological subtype of ICC.

CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

DCE-US has the potential to assess the subtypes of ICC lesions quantitatively and preoperatively, which allows for more accurate and objective differential diagnoses, and more appropriate treatments and follow-up or additional examination strategies for the two subtypes.

KEY POINTS

Preoperative determination of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) subtype aids in surgical decision-making. Quantitative parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced US (DCE-US) allow for the prediction of the ICC subtype. DCE-US-based imaging has the potential to become a novel complementary method for predicting ICC subtypes.

Cytomorphology of paediatric hepatocellular carcinoma: A useful diagnostic adjunct

INTRODUCTION

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common primary malignancy of the liver but is rare in the paediatric age group; thus, it may be misdiagnosed as the more common tumour, hepatoblastoma. Management varies in both these tumours, and pathological diagnosis thus plays an important role for definitive therapy. Only a few case reports available in the literature have described the cytological characteristics of paediatric HCC. The present study was thus planned to evaluate the cytomorphological features of paediatric HCC.

METHODS

Cases diagnosed with HCC on ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology over a period of 14 years were retrieved. The cases were evaluated for detailed cytological features including cellularity, architecture, sinusoidal wrapping, trabecular thickness, necrosis, anisonucleosis, chromatin, nucleoli, nuclear contours, bi- or multinucleation, intranuclear and intracytoplasmic inclusions, naked nuclei, extra-medullary haematopoiesis, monomorphism, and nuclear overlapping.

RESULTS

Twelve cases of HCC were included in the study. The median age at diagnosis was 10 years. Serum alpha-fetoprotein level was raised in most of them. Five of the 12 cases were characterised as moderately differentiated, three as poorly differentiated, two as well differentiated, and two as the fibrolamellar type of HCC. Cytohistological correlation was performed in seven cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration serves as a useful tool to diagnose paediatric HCC and differentiate it from other primary hepatic malignancies, especially hepatoblastoma which closely mimics HCC in this age group, as serum alpha protein levels and imaging findings are unable to distinguish these two tumours.

Hepatocellular Neoplasm of Uncertain Potential of Malignancy or Well-Differentiated Hepatocellular Carcinoma Arising within Hepatocellular Adenoma

Background. Hepatocellular adenoma (HCA) is an uncommon solid, solitary, benign liver lesion that develops in an otherwise normal-appearing liver. Hemorrhage and malignant transformation are the most important complications. Risk factors for malignant transformation include advanced age, male gender, use of anabolic steroids, metabolic syndrome, larger lesions, and beta-catenin activation subtype. The identification of higher risk adenomas enables the selection of patients most suitable for aggressive treatment and those who benefit with surveillance, minimizing the risks for these predominantly young patients. Case Presentation. We present the case of a 29-year-old woman with a history of oral contraceptive intake for 13 years, which was sent to evaluation in our Hepato-Bilio-Pancreatic and Splenic Unit because of a large nodular lesion in segment 5 of the liver, compatible with HCA, and was proposed to surgical resection. Histological and immunohistochemical investigation revealed an area with atypical characteristics, suggesting malignant transformation. Conclusions. HCAs share similar imaging characteristics and histopathological features with hepatocellular carcinomas; therefore, immunohistochemical and genetic studies assumes great importance to discriminate adenomas with malignant transformation. Beta-catenin, glutamine synthetase, glypican-3, and heat-shock protein 70 are promising markers to identify higher risk adenomas.

Cytological Comparison between Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma by Image Analysis Software Using Touch Smear Samples of Surgically Resected Specimens

To investigate useful cytological features for differential diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), this study cytologically compared HCC to ICC using image analysis software. Touch smear specimens of surgically resected specimens were obtained from a total of 61 nodules of HCC and 16 of ICC. The results indicated that the major/minor axis ratio of ICC is significantly larger than that of HCC (1.67 ± 0.27 vs. 1.32 ± 0.11, p < 0.0001) in Papanicolaou staining. This result means that the nucleus of HCC is close to round and the nucleus of ICC is close to an oval. This significant difference in the major/minor axis ratio between ICC and HCC was consistently observed by the same analyses using clinical samples of cytology (4 cases of HCC and 13 cases of ICC) such a fine-needle aspiration, brushing and ascites (ICC: 1.45 ± 0.13 vs. HCC: 1.18 ± 0.056, p = 0.004). We also confirmed that nuclear position center-positioned nucleus (p < 0.0001) and granular cytoplasm (p < 0.0001) are typical features of HCC tumor cells compared to ICC tumor cells. The research study found a significant difference in the nuclear morphology of HCC (round shape) and ICC (oval shape) in Papanicolaou-stained cytology specimens. This simple and objective finding will be very useful for the differential cytodiagnosis of HCC and ICC.

DCE-MRI based radiomics nomogram for preoperatively differentiating combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma from mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To establish a radiomics nomogram based on dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MR images to preoperatively differentiate combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CC) from mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IMCC).

METHODS

A total of 151 training cohort patients (45 cHCC-CC and 106 IMCC) and 65 validation cohort patients (19 cHCC-CC and 46 IMCC) were enrolled. Findings of clinical characteristics and MR features were analyzed. Radiomics features were extracted from the DCE-MR images. A radiomics signature was built based on radiomics features by the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator algorithm. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify the significant clinicoradiological variables and construct a clinical model. The radiomics signature and significant clinicoradiological variables were then incorporated into the radiomics nomogram by multivariate logistic regression analysis. Performance of the radiomics nomogram, radiomics signature, and clinical model was assessed by receiver operating characteristic and area under the curve (AUC) was compared.

RESULTS

Eleven radiomics features were selected to develop the radiomics signature. The radiomics nomogram integrating the alpha fetoprotein, background liver disease (cirrhosis or chronic hepatitis), and radiomics signature showed favorable calibration and discrimination performance with an AUC value of 0.945 in training cohort and 0.897 in validation cohort. The AUCs for the radiomics signature and clinical model were 0.848 and 0.856 in training cohort and 0.792 and 0.809 in validation cohort, respectively. The radiomics nomogram outperformed both the radiomics signature and clinical model alone (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The radiomics nomogram based on DCE-MRI may provide an effective and noninvasive tool to differentiate cHCC-CC from IMCC, which could help guide treatment strategies.

KEY POINTS

• The radiomics signature based on dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging is useful to preoperatively differentiate cHCC-CC from IMCC. • The radiomics nomogram showed the best performance in both training and validation cohorts for differentiating cHCC-CC from IMCC.

Immunocytochemistry for diagnostic cytopathology-A practical guide

Cytological specimens, which are obtained by minimally invasive methods, are an excellent source of diagnostic material. Sometimes they are the only material available for diagnosis as well as for prognostic/predictive markers. When cytomorphology is not straightforward, ancillary tests may be required for a definitive diagnosis to guide clinical management. Immunocytochemistry (ICC) is the most common and practical ancillary tool used to reach a diagnosis when cytomorphology is equivocal, to differentiate entities with overlapping morphological features, and to determine the cell lineage and the site of origin of a metastatic neoplasm. Numerous immunomarkers are available, and some are expressed in multiple neoplasms. To rule out entities within a differential diagnosis, the use of more than one marker, sometimes panels, is necessary. ICC panels for diagnostic purposes should be customised based on the clinical context and cytomorphology, and the markers should be used judiciously to preserve material for additional tests for targeted therapies in the appropriate setting. This review offers a practical guide for the use of ICC for diagnostic cytopathology, covering the most commonly encountered non-hematolymphoid diagnostic scenarios in various body sites.

Laparoscopic hepatectomy for hepatic angiomyolipoma with preoperative diagnosis of other malignancy: a report of 2 cases

Background

Hepatic angiomyolipoma (HAML) is a rare liver tumor, and hepatectomy is the only effective treatment. Due to the difficulty of correct diagnosis of HAML before surgery by image studies, more than 36.6% of reported HAMLs are misdiagnosed as other malignant liver tumors before surgery. As there are only few reported cases in which HAMLs were removed using laparoscopic hepatectomy, the effectiveness of laparoscopic hepatectomy for such HAMLs in which are diagnosed as other malignant liver tumor before surgery has not been reported.

Case presentation

Case 1: a 58-year-old female with a history of treatment for autoimmune hepatitis was preoperatively diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma (size: 20 mm) in segment 7 (S7) of the liver. The tumor was removed by laparoscopic partial resection and was diagnosed as a HAML through a pathological examination. The patient’s postoperative course was good, and she was recurrence-free at 37 months after the hepatectomy. Case 2: a 29-year-old female with a history of surgery for a right mature cystic teratoma was referred to our department to receive treatment for a growing 20-mm liver tumor with some calcification, which arose in S3 of the liver. A metastatic liver tumor derived from the mature cystic teratoma was suspected, and laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy was performed. The liver tumor was diagnosed as a HAML after a pathological examination. The patient’s postoperative course was unremarkable, and more than 54 months have passed since the hepatectomy without any recurrence.

Conclusions

Two cases in which HAMLs were preoperatively diagnosed as other malignant liver tumor were successfully removed by laparoscopic hepatectomy with a correct postoperative diagnosis. Laparoscopic hepatectomy for the present 2 cases of HAML seemed to be effective for providing a correct diagnosis after the curative removement of liver tumor with a smaller invasion compared to open hepatectomy, and for denying risk of dissemination of the malignant tumor by needle biopsy that had to be considered before ruling out malignant tumor.

Optimizing small liver biopsy specimens: a combined cytopathology and surgical pathology perspective

Both fine-needle aspiration (FNA) and core needle biopsy (CNB) are widely used to obtain liver biopsy specimens, particularly from mass lesions. However, the advantages and disadvantages of FNA versus CNB in terms of appropriate use, diagnostic yield, complications, and whether or not specimens should be handled by cytopathologists, surgical pathologists, or both remain subjects of controversy. This review addresses the issues of sample adequacy, appropriate use of each technique and complications, and challenges regarding the diagnosis of both hepatic tumors and non-neoplastic liver disease.

Metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosed by fine needle aspiration: A clinical and cytologic study

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the second leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide. The clinical and cytological features of metastatic HCC have not been well established.

METHODS

To determine the clinical and cytological features of metastatic HCC, we retrospectively searched for all HCC metastasis diagnosed by fine needle aspiration or core biopsy.

RESULTS

We found 12 bone metastases, 11 intra-abdominal, 4 lung, 3 soft tissue, and 2 lymph node metastases from 32 patients. 7/12 bone metastases were vertebral body, 4 were pelvic bone, and 1 case was humerus. 10/32 cases showed concurrent metastasis at a different location. The average metastasis size was 40.9 mm. Tumor grades of HCC showed near equal distribution. The following cytological features are most frequently associated with metastatic HCC: single tumor cells (88.9%), cytoplasmic vacuolization (70.4%), trabecular pattern (70.4%), bare nuclei (66.7%), prominent nucleoli (66.7%), tumor giant cells (44.4%), and traversing capillaries (44.4%) and encased by endothelium (18.5%). Immunohistochemical stains of 12 cases showed the majority were positive for E-Cadherin, Carcinoembryonic Antigen, and HepPar1. Negativity for CK7 and CK20 is contributory to making the diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

The most frequent metastatic HCC diagnosed by FNA was from bone, especially the vertebral body. The frequent cytomorphology and immunophenotype seen in primary HCC are good diagnostic criteria for diagnosing metastatic HCC.

Expression of Markers of Hepatocellular Differentiation in Pancreatic Acinar Cell Neoplasms: A Potential Diagnostic Pitfall

OBJECTIVES

Pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma (ACC) is a rare tumor that frequently metastasizes to the liver and may present a diagnostic challenge due to its morphologic similarity to hepatocellular carcinoma. We investigated α-fetoprotein (AFP), hepatocyte paraffin antigen 1 (HepPar 1), glypican 3, arginase 1, and albumin messenger RNA (mRNA) in situ hybridization (ISH) in pancreatic neoplasms with ACC differentiation to assess their diagnostic value.

METHODS

AFP, HepPar 1, glypican 3, and arginase 1 immunohistochemical staining was performed on 28 ACCs using a tissue microarray. Albumin mRNA ISH was performed on full-faced sections.

RESULTS

Fifteen tumors were positive for at least one marker. Glypican 3 was positive in seven of 28, AFP in five 28, and albumin mRNA ISH in five of 20. None expressed arginase 1.

CONCLUSIONS

Hepatocellular differentiation markers, including albumin mRNA ISH, may be positive in ACC, but arginase 1 appears to be uniformly negative. Thus, its use may improve the accuracy in distinguishing these neoplasms from hepatocellular carcinoma. If ACC diagnosis is considered, acinar differentiation can be reliably demonstrated by trypsin/chymotrypsin.

Diagnostic importance of Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration in Diagnosing Hepatic Lesions among Sudanese Patients 2015

BACKGROUND

Liver cytology is indicated and requested for evaluating hepatic masses in symptomatic or serendipitous cryptic discovered lesions.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the cytomorphological patterns of hepatic lesions identified among a group of Sudanese patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is an analytical descriptive hospital-based study included 165 patients undergoing ultrasound-guided fine needle is an aspiration cytology (FNAC)for hepatic lesions, at Al-Amal Military Hospital and Khartoum Teaching Hospital in Khartoum, Sudan. Clinical data were reviewed. Air dried Diff Quick stained smears were grouped into unsatisfactory samples, benign lesions, and malignant neoplasms.

RESULTS

Our population were consisted of 35 (21.2%) females and 130 (78.8%) males, with a male to female ratio 3.7:1 and an age ranged between 47 to 80, and a mean age 57±7. Of 165 cases, 57 (34.5%) were benign, no atypia were noticed, 101 (61.2%) were malignant. Most investigated patients were found to have metastatic lesions.

CONCLUSION

FNAC is a useful tool for investigating hepatic lesions.

Impact of flow cytometry in liver cytopathology

BACKGROUND

Fine needle aspiration (FNA) is commonly used as a diagnostic tool for the evaluation of lymphoproliferative diseases. Cytomorphology alone is often insufficient for the diagnosis and subclassification of lymphoma; therefore, flow cytometry (FC) plays an important role in the characterization of lymphoproliferative disorders. This study reviews our experience with FC on liver FNA at the Johns Hopkins Hospital.

METHODS

2,424 liver FNAs performed over a 21-year period were reviewed for clinical FC data (n=74) or a subsequent diagnosis of lymphoma in the liver without FC data (n=40).

RESULTS

In our study, 114 cases (4.7%) were included out of the 2,424 liver FNAs performed during the study period. Lymphoma was diagnosed 79 times. Cytomorphology alone was diagnostic of lymphoma in 45 cases, and in 33 cases both the cytomorphology and the FC were consistent with a diagnosis of lymphoma. Neither FC nor cytomorphology were diagnostic of lymphoma on 1 specimen. In 39 cases, FC had negative results on a lesion suspicious for lymphoma based on cytomorphology. In several nonlymphoma cases, FC provided information that allowed further subclassification of the neoplasm.

CONCLUSION

FC is a useful adjuvant diagnostic test for liver FNAs performed on patients with lymphoproliferative disorders.

Clinical utility of a simple primary culture method in hepatocellular carcinoma patients

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The clinical utility of our designed primary culture method in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma was investigated.

METHODS

Specimens obtained from ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of 108 hepatocellular carcinoma patients were cultured. The associations of the cellular proliferative speeds with cancer invasiveness and 1-year survivals were analyzed.

RESULTS

Successful cultures were achieved in 105 patients (97.2%). Ten hepatocellular carcinoma and nine cancer-associated fibroblast cell lines were established. The cells obtained from patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM staging ≥ IIIB upon entering the study had higher proportion of rapidly proliferative cancer cells than those from patients with staging ≤ IIIA (P < 0.005). For Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer classification A or B patients receiving palliative transcatheter chemoembolization, patients with rapidly proliferative cancer-associated fibroblasts showed higher incidence of cancer-related death than patients with other proliferative patterns (P = 0.0385). The influence of the presence of rapidly proliferative cancer cells on survivals in this group could not be calculated due to a very small number of this kind of patients (9.5%). For Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer classification C patients receiving non-curative treatment, the incidence of rapidly proliferative cancer cells was 45.2%. Patients with rapidly proliferative cancer cells showed higher incidence of cancer-related death than patients with other proliferative patterns in patients receiving chemoembolization (P = 0.0452) and in patients receiving conservative treatment (P = 0.0206).

CONCLUSION

Our method can provide cells from individual patient for researches and predict outcomes in patients receiving non-curative treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.

A case of focal nodular hyperplasia with growth progression during pregnancy

Focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) is the second most common benign solid tumor of the liver and is usually found in young females. In FNH, spontaneous bleeding or rupture rarely occurs and malignant transformation is unlikely. The etiology of FNH is unclear, but because of female predominance and young age at onset, it seems that female hormone has an important role for the development of FNH. Although the development and the complications of hepatocellular adenomas have been related to the use of oral contraceptives and pregnancy, the influence of oral contraceptives and pregnancy on the growth and complications of FNH is controversial. Most FNH are stable in size and rarely complicated during pregnancy. We describe here a case of FNH with growth progression during pregnancy in a 27-year-old female. Her course of pregnancy and delivery was uneventful. Two months after delivery, the size of FNH was decreased.

Immunohistochemical Study of Glypican-3 and HepPar-1 in Differentiating Hepatocellular Carcinoma from Metastatic Carcinomas in FNA of the Liver

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains a common malignant cancer worldwide, it is considered the fifth most common malignant cancer. On the other hand, metastatic tumors are widespread in the liver , with metastatic adenocarcinoma (MA) constituting the greatest part, therefore differentiation of HCC from MA is a frequent problem facing the pathologist especially in liver fine-needle aspiration biopsies. Evaluating the diagnostic value of glypican-3 (GPC-3) and HepPar-1 immunostaining in differentiating hepatocellular carcinoma from metastatic tumors in liver cell block material. Fourty eight cell blocks prepared from FNA from the liver ( 30 cases HCC, 18 cases metastatic carcinoma in liver) stained by Glypican -3 and HepPar-1 immunohistochemical markers. Glypican-3 was immunoexpressed in 97% of cases of HCC while all cases of metastatic carcinoma were negative. HepPar-1 was expressed in 93% of cases of HCC and 11% of metastatic carcinoma of the liver. In this study the sensitivity of GPC3 in the diagnosis of HCC in cytological material was 96.7% and the specificity was 100% while the sensitivity and specificity of HepPar-1 was 93.3% and 88.9% respectively. Immunohistochemical staining for GPC-3 in cell block material of the liver is highly sensitive and specific and it is a valuable tool capable of differentiating HCC from most of metastatic tumors of the liver.

Tissue diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma

The current American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) guideline provides strategies for achieving the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) based on the size of liver nodules seen on surveillance imaging. For lesions less than 1 cm in size, follow-up surveillance imaging is recommended. Lesions larger than 2 cm require typical radiological hallmark on dynamic imaging. Lesions of 1-2 cm in size require typical imaging features including intense uptake of contrast during arterial phases followed by decreased enhancement during portal venous phases on at least 2 imaging modalities. In cases of atypical radiological features of the suspected lesion, tissue diagnosis either by fine needle aspiration or biopsy should be obtained. Although fine needle aspiration could give a smaller risk of seeding than biopsy, biopsy has been preferred over cytology. Percutaneous biopsy of HCC carries a potential risk of tumor seeding along the needle tract. However the risk is low and there is no clear evidence of post transplant recurrence due to needle tract seeding. Histopathologic assessment can differentiate between premalignant lesions such as dysplastic nodules and early HCC. Atypical variants of HCC can be recognized morphologically which may have associated prognostic value.

Accuracy of cytotechnologist evaluation of specimen adequacy and screening interpretation of malignancy in fine-needle aspiration of the liver

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the performance of cytotechnologists in assessing the adequacy and accuracy of the preliminary diagnosis for fine-needle aspirates of the liver.

STUDY DESIGN

We retrospectively analyzed 10 years of data and found 589 cases of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) of the liver with on-site evaluation of adequacy (OSEA). All the OSEA were performed by the cytopathologist because OSEA of liver FNA is not performed by cytotechnologists at our institution at present. After OSEA, the material was seen by cytotechnologists who rendered an adequacy assessment and preliminary diagnosis. We calculated the adequacy and accuracy statistics and compared the performance of the cytotechnologists with the OSEA and final interpretation.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference in adequacy downgrade rate for cytotechnologist versus cytopathologist assessment during the study period (5 vs. 3%, p = 0.06). A total agreement of 88% was noted in overall diagnosis with 97% agreement in malignant cases.

CONCLUSION

Cytotechnologists assess the adequacy of liver FNA accurately and there is therefore potential for them to perform OSEA for liver FNA.

Arginase-1: a highly specific marker separating pancreatic adenocarcinoma from hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Arginase-1 and HepPar-1 are effective immunohistochemical (IHC) markers for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In this study, we explored the possible efficacy of these stains in diagnosing pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAD).

STUDY DESIGN

Arginase-1 and HepPar-1 IHC was performed on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded fine needle aspiration (FNA) cell blocks (CB) of PAD (n = 46), tissue microarray (TMA) of PAD (n = 33), FNA CB of HCC (n = 44) and TMA of HCC (n = 85). Negative controls without carcinoma were also applied (pancreas CB, n = 7; pancreas TMA, n = 3).

RESULTS

PAD CB demonstrated arginase-1 positivity in 0 of 46 cases and HepPar-1 positivity in 7 of 46 cases (15%). PAD TMA demonstrated arginase-1 positivity in 0 of 33 cases and HepPar-1 positivity in 4 of 33 cases (12%). HCC CB demonstrated arginase-1 positivity in 37 of 44 cases (84%) and HepPar-1 positivity in 32 of 44 cases (72%). HCC TMA demonstrated arginase-1 positivity in 75 of 85 cases (88%) and HepPar-1 positivity in 80 of 85 cases (94%).

CONCLUSION

Both arginase-1 and HepPar-1 are effective IHC markers of hepatocellular differentiation. Arginase-1 demonstrates superior sensitivity and specificity compared with HepPar-1 in the diagnosis of HCC. However, both arginase-1 and HepPar-1 have a low sensitivity and a very high specificity for PAD.

Is surgery necessary for patients with hepatic angiomyolipoma? Retrospective analysis from eight Chinese cases

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Hepatic angiomyolipoma (AML) is a rare, hepatic mesenchymal neoplasm. Its preoperative diagnosis is very difficult, and the treatment is still controversial. The aim is to summarize experience in diagnosis and management of hepatic AML from a cancer center.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical presentation, histopathological, features and treatment of the tumors encountered at our institute from January 2000 to December 2012.

RESULTS

The patients included six females and two males, with female preponderance. Six patients are asymptomatic. Laboratory tests lack specificity. Combining imaging modality, only one patient obtained the accurate diagnosis of hepatic AML and was confirmed by fine-needle aspiration biopsy combined with homatropine methylbromide-45 staining. All other patients received hepatic resection. There was no tumor recurrence or increase of tumor size within the follow-up period.

CONCLUSION

We suggest fine-needle aspiration combined with homatropine methylbromide-45 staining should be performed in all patients who are asymptomatic and without serological abnormalities. Surgical resection might be considered only if the malignant potential of the lesion cannot be ruled out or the tumor size is increasing during observation.

Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio predicts overall and recurrence-free survival after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma

AIM

The goal of this study is to evaluate whether an elevated neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) at the time of diagnosis predicts survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after liver transplantation (LT). We hypothesize that the NLR is predictive of overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) in patients with HCC who undergo LT.

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of adult patients undergoing LT for HCC between 2000 and 2008 at our institution. We define an elevated NLR as a ratio of 5 or greater.

RESULTS

We included 160 patients who underwent LT for HCC in the time period, of whom 28 had an elevated NLR. Seventeen subjects experienced recurrent HCC during the study period. The cumulative survival among subjects with an elevated NLR was significantly lower than among subjects with a normal NLR. On univariate analysis, several factors (including an elevated NLR) predicted decreased OS and RFS. However, after multivariate analysis, only three factors (including elevated NLR) remained significant as predictors of OS. Additionally, multivariate analysis revealed that an elevated NLR was the only significant independent predictor of RFS.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative NLR is a powerful independent predictor of OS and RFS in patients undergoing LT for HCC. Measurement of NLR could serve as a useful and easily obtained adjunct to the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score and Milan criteria when evaluating this patient population and determining which patients will gain the most survival benefit from transplantation.

The changing face of percutaneous image-guided biopsy: molecular profiling and genomic analysis in current practice

Oncology is undergoing a revolutionary change. Image-guided biopsy is expected to play an increasingly important role in this radical transformation. Current concepts of disease and treatment are based on an established set of physical signs and symptoms and laboratory tests broken down by organ system. However, soon diseases will be categorized and treated based on much more specific and detailed molecular and genetic information. This transformation in how disease is categorized and treated will depend on the ability to harvest tissue from tumors and analyze it appropriately.

Fortuitously discovered liver lesions

The fortuitously discovered liver lesion is a common problem. Consensus might be expected in terms of its work-up, and yet there is none. This stems in part from the fact that there is no preventive campaign involving the early detection of liver tumors other than for patients with known liver cirrhosis and oncological patients. The work-up (detection and differential diagnosis) of liver tumors comprises theoretical considerations, history, physical examination, laboratory tests, standard ultrasound, Doppler ultrasound techniques, contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, as well as image-guided biopsy. CEUS techniques have proved to be the most pertinent method; these techniques became part of the clinical routine about 10 years ago in Europe and Asia and are used for a variety of indications in daily clinical practice. CEUS is in many cases the first and also decisive technical intervention for detecting and characterizing liver tumors. This development is reflected in many CEUS guidelines, e.g., in the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (EFSUMB) guidelines 2004, 2008 and 2012 as well as the recently published World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology-EFSUMB guidelines 2012. This article sets out considerations for making a structured work-up of incidental liver tumors feasible.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of hepatic caudate lobe malignancy: Report of 4 cases

AIM: To investigate the diagnostic value of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in the detection of hepatic caudate lobe masses.

METHODS: Clinical data for four patients with hepatic malignancy (three males and one female, aged 50 to 69 years) were retrospectively analyzed. The diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNA was assessed by cell smear and histological examination. All patients were closely monitored for complications after EUS-FNA.

RESULTS: Nine solid lesions were aspirated (4 in the caudate lobe, 1 in the left lobe, 2 in the pancreatic head, 1 in the hilar lymph node, and 1 in the retroperitoneal lymph node). All aspirates (9/9) were available for cell smear and 88.9% (8/9) for histological analysis. The diagnosis rates of cell smear and HE staining were 100% (9/9) and 100% (8/8), respectively. All 4 patients were diagnosed with hepatic malignancy (2 cases of primary liver cancer and 2 cases of liver metastasis from pancreatic cancer). No obvious complications were observed in all patients.

CONCLUSION: Given the relationship between hepatic caudate lobe and the cardia in topographic anatomy, EUS allows for easily scanning enlarged porta hepatis and retroperitoneal lymph nodes simultaneously and guiding FNA. EUS and EUS-FNA have important clinical value in the diagnosis of hepatic caudate lobe tumors.

Role of FNA and Core Biopsy of Primary and Metastatic Liver Disease

Objective. To examine our experience with cytology and histology biopsy of the liver and to define methods for improvement of diagnosis of primary liver tumors. Methods. This include retrospective study of 189 biopsies of 185 liver masses for cytological or histological analysis. Patients were subdivided into two groups. Group 1 consisted of 124 suspected metastasis. Group 2 consisted of 61 suspected primary neoplasms. Biopsies were considered positive or equivocal. In equivocal cases, special stains were performed. In Group 2, cases were classified by contrast CT or MRI as to (I) classic HCC, (II) infiltrated HCC, or (Ill) equivocal. Results. Definitive diagnosis was obtained in 117/124 masses (94%) in Group 1, 48/61 masses (79%) in Group 2, and (Ill) equivocal 13 cases in Group II. In two equivocal cases in which special stains were performed, they were reclassified as HCC. In 8/13 cases, CT findings were consistent with HCC. Conclusion. Liver biopsies are useful in obtaining a definitive diagnosis of suspected metastatic liver disease. Biopsy results are less reliable in patients with suspected primary liver tumors. In these situations, strategies can include basing treatment on imaging criteria or use of newer special pathological stains. Advances in Knowledge. Use of newer special immunological stains improves accuracy in definitive diagnosis of primary liver tumors.

Arginase-1, HepPar-1, and Glypican-3 are the most effective panel of markers in distinguishing hepatocellular carcinoma from metastatic tumor on fine-needle aspiration specimens

Distinction of liver metastases from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) may present a diagnostic challenge. Arginase-1 (Arg-1) is a marker for HCC recently described in some literature. Immunohistochemical evaluation of Arg-1, hepatocyte paraffin-1 (HepPar-1), and glypican-3 expression was performed on 1,240 surgical specimens and 62 liver fine-needle aspiration specimens (29 HCCs, 28 metastatic tumors, and 5 benign liver cases). The staining results on tissue microarray sections showed that 2.7% and 3.1% of nonhepatic tumor cases were positive for HepPar-1 and glypican-3, respectively; none was positive for Arg-1. For fine-needle aspiration specimens, 19 HCCs were positive for all 3 markers; 9 were positive for 1 or 2 markers; and only 1 case was negative for all 3 markers. These data demonstrate that Arg-1 is the most specific marker in differentiating a non-HCC from HCC. It is recommended to use 3 markers as a panel in distinguishing HCC from metastatic carcinoma.

Hepatocellular carcinoma: natural history, current management, and emerging tools

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary liver tumor and represents the third-leading cause of cancer-related death in the world. The incidence of HCC continues to increase worldwide, with a unique geographic, age, and sex distribution. The most important risk factor associated with HCC is liver cirrhosis, with the majority of cases caused by chronic infection with hepatitis B (HBV) and C (HCV) viruses and alcohol abuse, although nonalcoholic fatty liver disease is emerging as an increasingly important cause. Primary prevention in the form of HBV vaccination has led to a significant decrease in HBV-related HCC, and initiation of antiviral therapy appears to reduce the incidence of HCC in patients with chronic HBV or HCV infection. Additionally, the use of ultrasonography enables the early detection of small liver tumors and forms the backbone of recommended surveillance programs for patients at high risk for the development of HCC. Cross-sectional imaging studies, including computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, represent further noninvasive techniques that are increasingly employed to diagnose HCC in patients with cirrhosis. The mainstay of potentially curative therapy includes surgery – either resection or liver transplantation. However, most patients are ineligible for surgery, because of either advanced disease or underlying liver dysfunction, and are managed with locoregional and/or systemic therapies. Randomized controlled trials have demonstrated a survival benefit with both local therapies, either ablation or embolization, and systemic therapy in the form of the multikinase inhibitor sorafenib. Despite this, median survival remains poor and recurrence rates significant. Further advances in our understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of HCC hold promise in improving the diagnosis and treatment of this highly lethal cancer.

Cytologic comparison between malignant and regenerative nodules in the background of cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

Incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma has been increased as the sixth most common cancer in the world. Improvement in imaging techniques has decreased the need for tissue confirmation in diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Meanwhile, false negative and positive cases are present. Fine needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy can be helpful to identify well-differentiated HCCs with low risk of vascular invasion and better prognosis following transplantation.

OBJECTIVES

We conducted this study to find useful criteria for cytological differential diagnosis between nodules of well differentiated hepatocellular in the background of cirrhosis and pure cirrhotic regenerative nodules in cytology smears.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

140 fine needle aspirations (FNA) of fresh cirrhotic hepatectomy specimens were studied (100 pure regenerative nodules and 40 HCC nodules). All slides were reviewed by two expert pathologists. The most useful criteria were selected and evaluated in 560 cytology smears stained by Pap and Wright methods.

RESULTS

None of the smears from cirrhotic patients showed mitosis, transgressing endothelium, eccentric nuclei, and scant cytoplasm, but thick nuclear membrane, spindle cells and abundant, thick and monotonous cytoplasm were found in many cases with cirrhosis. Large nucleoli (2 %), multiple nucleoli (6 %), increased N/C ratio (4 %), and broad cores (2 %) were found very rarely in the smears of regenerative nodules, but they were present in 50 %, 72.5 %, 87 %, and 77.5 % of HCC nodules, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination of cytologic criteria can be helpful for differential diagnosis between HCC and regenerative nodules.

Arginase-1: a novel immunohistochemical marker of hepatocellular differentiation in fine needle aspiration cytology

BACKGROUND

Arginase-I is a key urea cycle metalloenzyme that has been used as an immunohistochemistry (IHC) marker for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Previous studies have demonstrated the efficacy of HepPar-1 and glypican-3 (GPC-3) IHC in liver fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology.

METHODS

Arginase-1 IHC was performed on FNA cell blocks, and its performance characteristics were compared with HepPar-1 and GPC-3. Ninety-two formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded cell blocks were selected (HCC [n = 44], cirrhosis [n = 2], focal nodular hyperplasia [n = 3], hepatic adenomas [n = 2], dysplastic nodules [n = 6], and metastatic carcinomas [n = 35]). IHC staining with antibodies directed against arginase-1, HepPar-1, and GPC-3 was performed with appropriate positive and negative controls.

RESULTS

Arginase-1 positivity was demonstrated in 37 of 44 (84.1%) cases of HCC, compared with 32 of 44 cases (72.7%) and 25 of 44 cases (56.8%) for HepPar-1 and GPC-3, respectively. Arginase-1 and GPC-3 expression were not observed in any cases of metastatic carcinoma (0%), whereas HepPar-1 expression was present in 1 case of metastatic carcinoma. In addition, both arginase-1 and HepPar-1 expression were present in all 13 cases (100%) of nonmalignant hepatocellular lesions, whereas GPC-3 expression was absent in all 13 cases (0%).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that both arginase-1 and HepPar-1 are effective IHC markers of hepatocellular differentiation. Furthermore, arginase-1 demonstrates superior sensitivity compared with GPC-3 and HepPar-1 in the diagnosis of HCC, whereas GPC-3 demonstrates superior specificity, as staining is not observed in benign hepatocellular lesions. Hence, use of arginase-1 with HepPar-1 and GPC-3 can aid in the diagnosis of HCC and separating from metastatic carcinoma.