When legal worlds collide: from research to treatment in hereditary cancer prevention

Hereditary ovarian and breast cancer: what have we learned?

An autosomal-dominant inherited trait predisposing women to both breast cancer (BC) and ovarian cancer (OC) was first described in 1971. Subsequent strides were made in identifying mutations in the eventually cloned genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 as being responsible for hereditary BC and OC (HBOC) in many women with early-onset HBOC. More recently, modifiers of BC risk have also been identified and are under study. The biological and molecular genetic pathways for malignant transformation in OC (ovarian epithelium and/or epithelium of the fallopian tube or, possibly, the endometrium and endocervix) remain elusive. The answer to the question 'What have we learned?' which is part of our chapter title unfortunately remains incomplete. However, intensive worldwide research indicates that its malignant transformation is the product of a multi-step process where there is an array of mutations which account for three or more classes of genes, inclusive of proto-oncogenes, tumor suppressor genes and mutator genes. This causal uncertainty heralds an enormous clinical-pathology dilemma, given the fact that epithelial OC, together with related Müllerian duct carcinoma, harbor the highest fatality rates of all gynecologic malignancies.

Communication and technology in genetic counseling for familial cancer

When a cancer predisposing germline mutation is detected in an index case, the presence of the underlying syndrome is confirmed and the potential for predictive testing of at-risk relatives is established. However, the reporting of a positive family history does not routinely lead to communication of information about risk to close, much less distant relatives. This review summarizes information technology utilized to address penetration or 'reach' of knowledge of risk within extended families, including the use of telephone and video counseling to reach distant patients, and anticipate novel internet-based processes for communication between investigators and relatives.

Sharing genetic risk with next generation: mutation-positive parents' communication with their offspring in Lynch Syndrome

Identification of hereditary predisposition to cancer has limited significance if not followed by efficient cancer prevention. The responsibility of informing offspring about genetic risk often falls to the parents. We systematically investigated how parents with Lynch Syndrome share knowledge of genetic risk with their offspring, challenges in the communication process and wish for professional support. Of all known mutation carriers over age 40 (n = 337) in 102 Finnish Lynch Syndrome families, 86% completed a self-reported questionnaire; 248 of them (86%) had children. Of the 248 parents, 87% reported disclosure and 13% nondisclosure. Reasons for nondisclosure were mainly the young age of offspring, socially distant relationships, or feeling of difficulty in discussing the topic. Men reported significantly more often disclosure with a support person (spouse etc.) (P < 0.001). The most difficult communication aspect was discussing children's cancer risk. Of the 191 firstborn adult children informed, 69% had taken the predictive genetic test. Every third parent suggested that health professionals should be involved in passing on the information and that a family appointment at the genetic clinic should be organized at the time of disclosure. Nearly all parents had informed their adult offspring about the genetic risk and possibility of genetic testing, but almost one-third were unsure of how their offspring had used the information. The challenge is to improve the communication processes, so that all offspring would get the information important for their health care, and parents would get the professional support desired at disclosure.

Direct contact in inviting high-risk members of hereditary colon cancer families to genetic counselling and DNA testing

BACKGROUND

Identification of hereditary predisposition to cancer has limited significance if not followed by efficient cancer prevention in the family. Probands are traditionally left to inform their relatives about the increased risk, but distant relatives may remain uninformed. An approach to contacting directly at-risk persons assumed to be unaware of their increased cancer risk was taken. With cancer prevention as the ultimate goal, the study was aimed at investigating attitudes towards and psychosocial consequences of this novel strategy.

METHODS

In families with hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (Lynch syndrome), 286 healthy adult relatives with a 50% risk of a predisposing mutation were contacted by letter. Of these, 112 participated in counselling and predictive testing. Baseline information and information obtained 1 month after the test for 73 respondents were compared with 299 corresponding subjects, approached via the proband (family-mediated approach in our previous study) in these families.

RESULTS

After the contact letter, 51% consented to the study. Of these, 92% approved of the direct contact and 33% had tried to seek information. In 34% of the mutation carriers, neoplasia was identified in the first post-test colonoscopy. Although post-test fear of cancer increased among the mutation carriers and decreased among noncarriers, almost all participants were satisfied with their decision to participate, independently of their test results, parallel to the family-mediated approach.

CONCLUSION

In this large-scale study, relatives in cancer families were actively contacted to inform them of the condition and genetic counselling. Their attitudes were encouraging, and the psychosocial consequences were similar to the family-mediated approach. Our results suggest the appropriateness of direct contact as an alternative method of contact in cases of life-threatening treatable disease.