Mild soaps and radiotherapy: a survey of the UK public to identify brands of soap considered mild and analysis of these to ascertain suitability for recommendation in radiotherapy departments

Stoma care: an update

Each year an estimated 13 500 stoma surgeries are carried out in the UK (Kettle, 2019). Stoma surgery may involve the formation of a colostomy or an ileostomy. The person with a stoma may require help and support from the community nurse. This article aims to update readers on the indications for colostomy and ileostomy surgery and to enable them to support ostomates to reduce the risks of complications.

Prevention of radiation dermatitis with skin hygiene and washing: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the effects of washing in patients receiving radiotherapy (RT) on radiation dermatitis (RD) severity.

METHODS

A literature search was performed using Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases between January 1, 1946, and January 31, 2023. Four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) studying the effects of washing with or without soap on RD were identified. A meta-analysis was conducted for clinician-reported outcomes using RevMan 5.4 and a narrative synthesis for patient-reported outcomes due to a lack of reported data amenable to quantitative comparison in accordance with the Synthesis Without Meta-analysis (SWiM) guidelines. The Cochrane Risk of bias (RoB2) and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) criteria were used to assess risk of bias and certainty of evidence, respectively.

RESULTS

Two RCTs met the inclusion criteria for meta-analysis. Washing with or without soap significantly reduced the incidence of severe RD (OR: 0.32, 95% CI: 0.19-0.55, p < 0.01) and moist desquamation (OR: 0.25, 95% CI: 0.12-0.52, p < 0.01). Two of four trials found an association between washing and reduced itching score (p = 0.38). Pain score was not found to be significantly different with or without washing in any of the four studies (p = 0.07). The two studies that assessed burn scores did not detect any difference between the washing group versus no washing group (p = 0.25). Washing was associated with improved quality of life (QoL) measures in one study.

CONCLUSION

Washing with or without soap during RT resulted in less severe RD and less moist desquamation. Given the QoL benefits of washing, it should be advocated as part of routine skin care during RT.

What is the appropriate skin cleaning method for nasopharyngeal cancer radiotherapy patients? A randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

To determine the effect of various cleaning methods for skin with acute radiation dermatitis (RD) in patients treated for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).

METHODS

A total of 168 NPC inpatients were randomized, while 152 patients completed the whole trial and the data were analyzed. Patients were randomly divided into the non-washing group (Group 1), washing with water alone group (Group 2), and washing with water and soap group (Group 3). All three groups received intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with other treatments. Follow-up from recruitment or the initial radiotherapy dose to 1 month after the final radiotherapy dose. CONSORT checklist was applied as the reporting guidelines for this study. The study evaluated a range of endpoints, including incidence, timing, severity of acute RD, and quality of life (QOL).

RESULTS

There were no allergic reactions or aggravating in both washing groups during the whole treatment. The incidence of acute RD was 100% in all three groups, while the incidence of severe RD (grades 2-3) differed among groups (Group 1 vs. Group 2 vs. Group 3: 51% vs. 23.5% vs. 18%; P = 0.001), washing moderately reduced severity compared with patients without washing. Washing also delayed the onset time of acute RD; the incidence of acute RD was significantly lower than non-washing during the first 20 fractions (P < 0.001). What is more, washing reduced the incidence of moist desquamation (25.5% vs. 5.9% vs. 6%; P = 0.003) and helped relieve itching (6.49 ± 2.09 vs. 4.90 ± 1.90 vs. 4.00 ± 1.58; P < 0.001). There were no significant differences among groups with respect to pain or burning sensation. Washing improved QOL on physical (64.37 ± 4.08 vs. 67.41 ± 4.05 vs. 71.30 ± 4.87; P < 0.001), emotional (61.47 ± 4.75 vs. 65.75 ± 3.46 vs. 70.80 ± 3.27; P < 0.001), and social functional dimensions (62.64 ± 3.57 vs. 64.87 ± 3.88 vs. 68.04 ± 4.89; P < 0.001) at the end of radiotherapy, and the outcome was similar at 1 month after radiotherapy (P < 0.05). Washing with water and soap was the most effective way to reduce itching and improving QOL among the three groups (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Washing irradiated skin reduces the occurrence and severity of acute radiation dermatitis.

CLINICAL TRIAL INFORMATION

ChiCTR2000038231, date of registration 09.18.2020.

What is the appropriate skin cleaning method for nasopharyngeal cancer radiotherapy patients? A randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

To determine the effect of various cleaning methods for skin with acute radiation dermatitis (RD) in patients treated for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).

METHODS

A total of 168 NPC inpatients were randomized, while 152 patients completed the whole trial and the data were analyzed. Patients were randomly divided into the non-washing group (Group 1), washing with water alone group (Group 2), and washing with water and soap group (Group 3). All three groups received intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with other treatments. Follow-up from recruitment or the initial radiotherapy dose to 1 month after the final radiotherapy dose. CONSORT checklist was applied as the reporting guidelines for this study. The study evaluated a range of endpoints, including incidence, timing, severity of acute RD, and quality of life (QOL).

RESULTS

There were no allergic reactions or aggravating in both washing groups during the whole treatment. The incidence of acute RD was 100% in all three groups, while the incidence of severe RD (grades 2-3) differed among groups (Group 1 vs. Group 2 vs. Group 3: 51% vs. 23.5% vs. 18%; P = 0.001), washing moderately reduced severity compared with patients without washing. Washing also delayed the onset time of acute RD; the incidence of acute RD was significantly lower than non-washing during the first 20 fractions (P < 0.001). What is more, washing reduced the incidence of moist desquamation (25.5% vs. 5.9% vs. 6%; P = 0.003) and helped relieve itching (6.49 ± 2.09 vs. 4.90 ± 1.90 vs. 4.00 ± 1.58; P < 0.001). There were no significant differences among groups with respect to pain or burning sensation. Washing improved QOL on physical (64.37 ± 4.08 vs. 67.41 ± 4.05 vs. 71.30 ± 4.87; P < 0.001), emotional (61.47 ± 4.75 vs. 65.75 ± 3.46 vs. 70.80 ± 3.27; P < 0.001), and social functional dimensions (62.64 ± 3.57 vs. 64.87 ± 3.88 vs. 68.04 ± 4.89; P < 0.001) at the end of radiotherapy, and the outcome was similar at 1 month after radiotherapy (P < 0.05). Washing with water and soap was the most effective way to reduce itching and improving QOL among the three groups (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Washing irradiated skin reduces the occurrence and severity of acute radiation dermatitis.

CLINICAL TRIAL INFORMATION

ChiCTR2000038231, date of registration 09.18.2020.

Eczema and the older person

Age-related changes lead to an increase in skin problems, and around 70% of older people have a treatable skin condition. However, ageing and poor physical health can make it difficult for older people to care for their skin. Eczema, a chronic inflammatory skin condition, where the skin becomes red, inflamed, itchy and scaly, can develop easily in older adults. This can, in turn, become infected and cause discomfort and health problems. This article explains how ageing affects the skin, how eczema can develop and how it can be treated, also touching upon the different types of eczema. It aims to equip community nurses with knowledge about this common condition and how to recognise and manage it.

A Canadian Survey of the Management of Radiation-Induced Skin Reactions

INTRODUCTION

Radiation therapy skin reactions are one of the most common side effects and can cause patient distress. In some cases, a severe radiation-induced skin reaction may limit delivered dose and potentially compromise treatment outcomes. There are some established best practices, but approaches and patient advice appear to have changed little over the years and are often based on tradition, not evidence. Canadian radiation therapy departments use different skin care products and approaches, and there has been little previous work to examine national practice patterns.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study used a 42-item electronic survey based on a questionnaire designed by the UK Society and College of Radiographers. Practice data were collected related to assessment and prophylactics, interventions for prevention and management, and use of tools and guidelines. The final survey version was distributed to an identified radiation therapist-registered nurse dyad at each radiation therapy department in Canada (n = 44).

RESULTS

Thirty-three departments responded (75% response rate). Results suggest a variation in national management. A number of departments continue to advise patients not to wash or use deodorant/antiperspirant despite having evidence to the contrary. There are also unnecessary restrictions on the use and timing of application of lotions as well as conflicting postradiotherapy skin care instructions regarding sun exposure.

CONCLUSION

The study demonstrated variation in practice across Canadian radiation therapy departments. National interprofessional guidelines could improve uptake of best practices. Where there is little evidence, a stress-reduction approach with more collaborative decision-making should be used to minimize patient disruption.