Haemodynamic effects of H2-receptor antagonists

Histamine H2-receptor antagonism improves conduit artery endothelial function and reduces plasma aldosterone level without lowering arterial blood pressure in angiotensin II-hypertensive mice

Aldosterone through the mineralocorticoid receptor MR has detrimental effects on cardiovascular disease. It reduces the bioavailability of nitric oxide and impairs endothelium-dependent vasodilatation. In resistance arteries, aldosterone impairs the sensitivity of vascular smooth muscle cells to nitric oxide by promoting the local secretion of histamine which activates H2 receptors. The present experiments tested in vivo and ex vivo the hypothesis that systemic H2-receptor antagonism reduces arterial blood pressure and improves vasodilatation in angiotensin II-induced chronic hypertension. Hypertension was induced by intravenous infusion of angiotensin II (60 ng kg-1 min-1) in conscious, unrestrained mice infused concomitantly with the H2-receptor antagonist ranitidine (27.8 µg kg-1 min-1) or vehicle for 24 days. Heart rate and arterial blood pressure were recorded by indwelling arterial catheter. Resistance (mesenteric) and conductance (aortae) arteries were harvested for perfusion myography and isometric tension recordings by wire myography, respectively. Plasma was analyzed for aldosterone concentration. ANGII infusion resulted in elevated arterial blood pressure and while in vivo treatment with ranitidine reduced plasma aldosterone concentration, it did not reduce blood pressure. Ranitidine improved ex vivo endothelial function (acetylcholine 10-9 to 10-6 mol L-1) in mesenteric resistance arteries. This was abolished by ex vivo treatment with aldosterone (10-9 mol L-1, 1 h). In aortic segments, in vivo ranitidine treatment impaired relaxation. Activation of histamine H2 receptors promotes aldosterone secretion, does not affect arterial blood pressure, and protects endothelial function in conduit arteries but promotes endothelial dysfunction in resistance arteries during angiotensin II-mediated hypertension. Aldosterone contributes little to angiotensin II-induced hypertension in mice.

Changes in the clinical and laboratory features of lupus patients after the big earthquake in Taiwan

In order to understand the impact of the massive earthquake on disease activity, 60 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) living in the earthquake area (group 1) and 31 patients living away from the area (group 2) were enrolled in this study. A questionnaire was used to record demographic data and clinical manifestations before and 6 months after the earthquake. Laboratory tests, including serum C3, C4, creatinine, anti-DNA antibody, CBC and 24 h urine protein were taken. The results showed that nine patients in group 1 had obvious disease flare-up as evidenced by fever, arthralgia, malar rash and photosensitivity, increased protein loss or edema, and other symptoms. However, there were no significant changes in either group 1 or 2 patients. In contrast, the comparison of laboratory parameters in group 1 patients before and after the earthquake showed a significant decrease of C4 from 17.3 +/- 15.3 to 14.1 +/- 7.33 and a significant increase of creatinine from 1.20 +/- 1.54 to 1.27 +/- 1.70 (P < 0.05), respectively. No significant difference for either C4 or creatinine was found in group 2 patients. In conclusion, there was no striking change in the clinical aspects for lupus patients. However, some laboratory results became abnormal in group 1 patients after the earthquake, indicating that their lupus status may have worsened.

H2-blocker modulates heart rate variability

The use of H2-blockers in the treatment of patients with peptic ulcer has become popular. However, this treatment has adverse cardiovascular effects. The aim of this study was to investigate proarrhythmic rhythm and autonomic nervous activity by analyzing heart rate variability in patients treated with omeprazole, ranitidine, and plaunotol. Nineteen patients (mean age 67.5 +/- 2.7 years) with active gastric ulcer were treated with omeprazole (20 mg/day) for 8 weeks, then ranitidine (300 mg/day) for the next 4 months, and finally plaunotol (240 mg/day). At each stage of the treatment, Holter electrocardiography was performed, and heart rate variability and arrhythmias analyzed. Heart rate variability yielded power in the low- (0.04-0.15 Hz) and high-frequency components (0.15-0.4 Hz). Although both ranitidine and omeprazole induced little change in cardiac rhythm, the high-frequency power was higher (10.3 +/- 0.8 vs 8.6 +/- 0.6 ms, P < 0.05) and the ratio of low-to-high frequency power was lower (1.41 +/-0.10 vs 1.59 +/- 0.09. P < 0.05) during ranitidine than during plaunotol treatment. Cosinor analysis of heart rate variability revealed a decreased amplitude of low-frequency power during omeprazole compared with during ranitidine and plaunotol treatment. Ranitidine modulated high-frequency power which may be related to the adverse cardiovascular effects of H2-blocker.

The safety of ranitidine in over a decade of use

BACKGROUND

Ranitidine hydrochloride (Zantac) is one of the most extensively studied and widely used drugs of all time. This has provided an excellent opportunity to define its safety profile.

METHODS

Data from 189 controlled clinical trials in which more than 26,000 patients received daily doses of ranitidine for 4 weeks or more were reviewed. More than 80% of patients were treated with up to 300 mg ranitidine daily; the remaining patients received doses of up to 1200 mg daily. Eighty-seven trials were placebo controlled. Analyses of post-marketing surveillance and a database of all spontaneously reported adverse events were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Overall in the clinical trial programme adverse events were reported by 20% of those receiving ranitidine compared with 27% of those receiving placebo. The pattern of events was similar in all treatment groups with no evidence of dose-related toxicity in regimens encompassing an eightfold range of therapeutic doses. Similarly in a programme of studies designed to evaluate a dose of ranitidine of 75 mg for non-prescription (over-the-counter) use in the treatment of heartburn, ranitidine was not associated with an adverse event profile distinct from that of placebo. Analysis of spontaneously reported adverse event data allowed identification of rare idiosyncratic events.

CONCLUSIONS

Review of data from a large population of controlled clinical trials with analyses of postmarketing surveillance studies and spontaneously reported adverse events confirmed the excellent safety profile of ranitidine.

Mast cells in human coronary arteries; is there any correlation with luminal narrowing?

Histamine in the human coronary arteries is harboured in mast cells and possibly in a non-mast cell store. Upon histamine exposure atherosclerotic coronary arteries react differently than normal coronary arteries, and histamine has been proposed to provoke vasospasms, ischaemia and sudden cardiac death. Previous reports have indicated a correlation between the mast cell density and the histamine content on the one hand and the degree of atherosclerosis on the other hand. Since previous reports applied visual assessment of the luminal narrowing only, we reexamined these results utilising planimetric methods. The study was accomplished by examining coronary arteries from autopsy cases (50-70 years, N = 29) with a diagnosis of sudden death, myocardial infarction or a non-cardiac cause. The mast cell density was calculated as the ratio between the mast cell count and the adventitial area as seen by light microscopy, and was compared to the degree of luminal narrowing. We were not able to find any correlation between the mast cell density and the luminal narrowing. The myocardial infarction group had the most severe degree of luminal narrowing, but there was no significant difference in mast cell density between the groups. We therefore question the previous notion that there is a correlation between the adventitial mast cell density in the coronary arteries and the luminal narrowing. Earlier reports may have been biased by visual assessment and by erroneously treating several measurements from the same person as independent samples.

Changes in the effects of nizatidine and famotidine on cardiac performance after pretreatment with ranitidine

This was an open, randomized study of the cardiovascular effects of the histamine H2 receptor antagonists ranitidine, famotidine, and nizatidine after single oral doses alone or in combination in healthy volunteers. When compared with placebo ranitidine (450 mg) did not have any haemodynamic effects. Nizatidine (300 mg) caused significant falls in heart rate and cardiac output. Famotidine (40 mg) caused significant falls in stroke volume and cardiac output and an increase in pre-ejection period. Pretreatment with ranitidine abolished the haemodynamic effects of nizatidine and caused a time-shift of 2 h in the onset of the cardiovascular effects of famotidine. The difference in the results for nizatidine and famotidine can be explained by the longer half-life of famotidine. Vascular effects are assumed to be responsible for impairment of cardiac performance by famotidine.

Dose-dependent heart rate reducing effect of nizatidine, a histamine H2-receptor antagonist

1. Twelve healthy subjects were treated in a randomised placebo-controlled crossover study with placebo, 150 mg, 300 mg, and 600 mg nizatidine, 100 mg pirenzepine, and 300 mg nizatidine plus 100 mg pirenzepine for 1 week each. 2. On the seventh treatment day, heart rate, blood pressure, systolic time intervals, impedance cardiographic and Doppler ultrasound variables were measured. 3. Stroke volume and blood pressure were not altered by nizatidine and/or pirenzepine. By contrast, heart rate and cardiac output significantly (P < 0.05) decreased in a dose-dependent manner 1.5 and 3 h after administration of 300 and 600 mg nizatidine. Treatment with 150 mg nizatidine led to similar though non-significant trends. 4. While a slightly insignificant rise in heart rate was detected with pirenzepine alone, heart rate and cardiac output remained unchanged upon combined nizatidine and pirenzepine treatment as compared with placebo and baseline values. 5. In conclusion, nizatidine reduced heart rate and cardiac output in a dose-dependent manner, whereas this negative chronotropic effect was counteracted by concurrent administration of the anti-cholinergic drug pirenzepine.

Pharmacology of gastric acid inhibition

Gastric acid secretion is precisely regulated by neural (acetylcholine), hormonal (gastrin), and paracrine (histamine; somatostatin) mechanisms. The stimulatory effect of acetylcholine and gastrin is mediated via increase in cytosolic calcium, whereas that of histamine is mediated via activation of adenylate cyclase and generation of cAMP. Potentiation between histamine and either gastrin or acetylcholine may reflect postreceptor interaction between the distinct pathways and/or the ability of gastrin and acetylcholine to release histamine from mucosal ECL cells. The prime inhibitor of acid secretion is somatostatin. Its inhibitory paracrine effect is mediated predominantly by receptors coupled via guanine nucleotide binding proteins to inhibition of adenylate cyclase activity. All the pathways converge on and modulate the activity of the luminal enzyme, H+,K(+)-ATPase, the proton pump of the parietal cell. Precise information on the mechanisms involved in gastric acid secretion and the identification of specific receptor subtypes has led to the development of potent drugs capable of inhibiting acid secretion. These include competitive antagonists that interact with stimulatory receptors (e.g. muscarinic M1-receptor antagonists and histamine H2-receptor antagonists) as well as non-competitive inhibitors of H+,K(+)-ATPase (e.g. omeprazole). The histamine H2-receptor antagonists (cimetidine, ranitidine, famotidine, nizatidine and roxatidine acetate) continue as first-line therapy for peptic ulcer disease and are effective in preventing relapse. Although they are generally well tolerated, histamine H2-receptor antagonists may cause untoward CNS, cardiac and endocrine effects, as well as interfering with the absorption, metabolism and elimination of various drugs. The dominance of the histamine H2-receptor antagonists is now being challenged by omeprazole. Omeprazole reaches the parietal cell via the bloodstream, diffuses through the cytoplasm and becomes activated and trapped as a sulfenamide in the acidic canaliculus of the parietal cell. Here, it covalently binds to H+,K(+)-ATPase, the hydrogen pump of the parietal cell, thereby irreversibly blocking acid secretion in response to all modes of stimulation. The main potential drawback to its use is its extreme potency which sometimes leads to virtual anacidity, gastrin cell hyperplasia, hypergastrinaemia and, in rats, to the development of carcinoid tumours. The cholinergic receptor on the parietal cell has recently been identified as an M3 subtype and that on postganglionic intramural neurones of the submucosal plexus as an M1 subtype.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Cardiovascular effects of omeprazole and famotidine

In a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover comparison, 12 patients with congestive heart failure (New York Heart Association class II) and dyspeptic complaints were treated orally for 1 week each with placebo, 40 mg omeprazole daily, and 40 mg famotidine daily. Non-invasive haemodynamic measurements were taken on the last day of treatment. Although omeprazole did not alter cardiac performance in impedance cardiography and mechanocardiography, the administration of famotidine led to a significant fall in stroke volume and cardiac output as compared with placebo (both p less than 0.05). Thus, omeprazole did not exert any relevant cardiovascular effects, in contrast to the H2-receptor antagonist famotidine.