Decrease in lipoprotein(a) after renal transplantation is related to the glucocorticoid dose

Lipoprotein(a) in clinical practice: New perspectives from basic and translational science

Elevated plasma concentrations of lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) are a causal risk factor for coronary heart disease (CHD) and calcific aortic valve stenosis (CAVS). Genetic, epidemiological and in vitro data provide strong evidence for a pathogenic role for Lp(a) in the progression of atherothrombotic disease. Despite these advancements and a race to develop new Lp(a) lowering therapies, there are still many unanswered and emerging questions about the metabolism and pathophysiology of Lp(a). New studies have drawn attention to Lp(a) as a contributor to novel pathogenic processes, yet the mechanisms underlying the contribution of Lp(a) to CVD remain enigmatic. New therapeutics show promise in lowering plasma Lp(a) levels, although the complete mechanisms of Lp(a) lowering are not fully understood. Specific agents targeted to apolipoprotein(a) (apo(a)), namely antisense oligonucleotide therapy, demonstrate potential to decrease Lp(a) to levels below the 30-50 mg/dL (75-150 nmol/L) CVD risk threshold. This therapeutic approach should aid in assessing the benefit of lowering Lp(a) in a clinical setting.

Lipoprotein (a): impact by ethnicity and environmental and medical conditions

Levels of lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)], a complex between an LDL-like lipid moiety containing one copy of apoB, and apo(a), a plasminogen-derived carbohydrate-rich hydrophilic protein, are primarily genetically regulated. Although stable intra-individually, Lp(a) levels have a skewed distribution inter-individually and are strongly impacted by a size polymorphism of the LPA gene, resulting in a variable number of kringle IV (KIV) units, a key motif of apo(a). The variation in KIV units is a strong predictor of plasma Lp(a) levels resulting in stable plasma levels across the lifespan. Studies have demonstrated pronounced differences across ethnicities with regard to Lp(a) levels and some of this difference, but not all of it, can be explained by genetic variations across ethnic groups. Increasing evidence suggests that age, sex, and hormonal impact may have a modest modulatory influence on Lp(a) levels. Among clinical conditions, Lp(a) levels are reported to be affected by kidney and liver diseases.

Effects of renal replacement therapy on plasma lipoprotein(a) levels

Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) have significantly higher levels of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] when compared to control populations. Elevated levels of Lp(a) may play a role in the high incidence of cardiovascular disease in ESRD. We conducted a prospective study to test the hypothesis that plasma levels of Lp(a) decline rapidly after renal transplantation proportional to the improvement in renal function, but are not affected by hemodialysis. All adults that initiated hemodialysis or received a renal transplant from our institution during a 10-month period were invited to participate in the study. Lp(a) levels were obtained immediately prior to the initiation of renal replacement therapy. In transplant recipients, repeat Lp(a) measures were done at 3 days, 5 days, 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 weeks and 4 weeks post-transplant. In hemodialysis patients, repeat Lp(a) measures were done after 3 months. We used a mixed effects model to analyze the effect of time, race and creatinine on Lp(a) after transplant. Lp(a) levels decreased rapidly after renal transplantation. Mean Lp(a) levels at 2 weeks were 35.3% lower than prior to transplantation. Each reduction of 50% in creatinine was associated with a 10.6% reduction in Lp(a) (p < 0.001). In contrast, there was no significant change in Lp(a) after initiation of hemodialysis. The rapid decrease of Lp(a) levels after renal transplantation provides support for a metabolic role of the kidney in Lp(a) catabolism and suggests that the increase in Lp(a) seen in chronic kidney disease is due to loss of functioning renal tissue.

Association of kidney function with serum lipoprotein(a) level: the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (1991-1994)

BACKGROUND

Elevated lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) levels have been observed in patients on dialysis therapy. However, few studies explored the relationship between kidney function and Lp(a) levels in patients with mild to moderate chronic kidney disease.

METHODS

We examined the association of estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) with Lp(a) level in 7,675 participants in the second phase of the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

RESULTS

There was no association between Lp(a) level and estimated GFR in the overall sample (geometric mean, 10.4 mg/dL [95% confidence interval (CI), 9.2 to 11.8] in the group with a GFR of 90 to 149 mL/min/1.73 m2 versus 9.3 mg/dL [95% CI, 7.9 to 11.0] in the group with a GFR of 60 to 89 mL/min/1.73 m2 versus 12.1 mg/dL [95% CI, 9.0 to 15.9] in the group with a GFR of 15 to 59 mL/min/1.73 m2; P = 0.77 for linear trend) or non-Hispanic whites (geometric mean, 8.9 mg/dL [95% CI, 7.8 to 10.2] versus 8.5 mg/dL [95% CI, 7.1 to 10.2] versus 10.9 mg/dL [95% CI, 8.1 to 14.7]; P = 0.54 for linear trend). However, non-Hispanic blacks (geometric mean, 30.4 mg/dL [95% CI, 28.0 to 33.0] versus 35.2 mg/dL [95% CI, 31.4 to 39.4] versus 40.2 mg/dL [95% CI, 27.7 to 58.2]; P = 0.01 for linear trend) and Mexican Americans (geometric mean, 6.2 mg/dL [95% CI, 5.3 to 7.2] versus 7.4 mg/dL [95% CI, 6.4 to 8.5] versus 11.0 mg/dL [95% CI, 5.7 to 20.3]; P = 0.04 for linear trend) showed modestly, but significantly, greater Lp(a) levels with lower GFRs. In a weighed quantile regression model adjusted for age, sex, and race, a lower GFR was associated with greater 95th percentile serum Lp(a) values in the overall sample and non-Hispanic whites and with greater median Lp(a) levels in Mexican Americans.

CONCLUSION

In a cross-section of the US population, a low GFR is associated with only moderately greater Lp(a) levels, and this association may differ by race-ethnicity.

Lipoprotein(a) plasma concentrations after renal transplantation: a prospective evaluation after 4 years of follow-up

The highly atherogenic lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is significantly elevated in patients with renal disease. It is discussed controversially whether Lp(a) concentrations decrease after renal transplantation and whether the mode of immunosuppressive therapy influences the Lp(a) concentrations. In a prospective study the Lp(a) concentrations before and on average 48 months after renal transplantation were measured in 145 patients. The determinants of the relative changes of Lp(a) concentrations were investigated in a multivariate analysis. Patients treated by CAPD showed a larger decrease of Lp(a) than hemodialysis patients, reflecting their markedly higher Lp(a) levels before transplantation. The relative decrease of Lp(a) was higher with increasing Lp(a) concentrations before transplantation in combination with an increasing molecular weight of apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)]. That means that the relative decrease of Lp(a) is related to the Lp(a) concentration and the apo(a) size polymorphism. With increasing proteinuria and decreasing glomerular filtration rate, the relative decrease of Lp(a) became less pronounced. Neither prednisolone nor cyclosporine (CsA) had a significant impact on the Lp(a) concentration changes. Azathioprine (Aza) was the only immunosuppressive drug which had a dose-dependent influence on the relative decrease of Lp(a) levels. These data clearly demonstrate a decrease of Lp(a) following renal transplantation which is caused by the restoration of kidney function. The relative decrease is influenced by Aza but not by CsA or prednisolone.

Alcohol withdrawal-induced change in lipoprotein(a): association with the growth hormone/insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I)/IGF-binding protein-1 (IGFBP-1) axis

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is an important risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Alcohol is one of the few nongenetic factors that lower Lp(a) levels, but the metabolic mechanisms of this action are unknown. Alcohol inhibits the growth hormone (GH)/insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) axis. Alcohol might also affect IGF-binding protein-1 (IGFBP-1), which is an acute inhibitor of IGF-I. We studied how alcohol withdrawal affects Lp(a) levels and the GH/IGF-I/IGFBP-1 axis. Male alcohol abusers (n=27; 20 to 64 years old) were monitored immediately after alcohol withdrawal for 4 days. Twenty-six healthy men, mainly moderate drinkers, served as control subjects. Fasting blood samples were drawn to determine Lp(a), IGF-I, and IGFBP-1 (by ELISA, RIA, and immunoenzymometric assay, respectively). Nocturnal (12 hours) urine collection was performed in 9 alcoholics and 11 control subjects for GH analyses (RIA). The groups were similar in age and body mass index. Lp(a), GH, and IGF-I tended to be lower and IGFBP-1 higher in the alcoholics immediately after alcohol withdrawal than in the control subjects. During the 4-day observation in alcoholics, Lp(a) levels increased by 64% and IGF-I levels by 41%, whereas IGFBP-1 levels decreased by 59% (P<.001 after ANOVA for all comparisons). Urinary GH levels tended to decline. The increase in Lp(a) correlated inversely with the changes in IGFBP-1 (r= -.63, P<.001, n=27) and GH (r=-.70, P<.05, n=9), but not with IGF-I. In multiple regression analysis, the main predictors for the increase in Lp(a) were IGFBP-1 and urinary GH. In conclusion, alcohol withdrawal induces interrelated and potentially atherogenic changes in Lp(a) and IGFBP-1 levels.