Increased coronary sinus blood temperature: correlation with systemic inflammation

Correlation between C-reactive protein in peripheral vein and coronary sinus in stable and unstable angina

Background

High sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) is commonly used in clinical practice to assess cardiovascular risk. However, a correlation has not yet been established between the absolute levels of peripheral and central hs-CRP.

Objective

To assess the correlation between serum hs-CRP levels (mg/L) in a peripheral vein in the left forearm (LFPV) with those in the coronary sinus (CS) of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and a diagnosis of stable angina (SA) or unstable angina (UA).

Methods

This observational, descriptive, and cross-sectional study was conducted at the Instituto do Coração, Hospital das Clinicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, and at the Hospital Beneficência Portuguesa de Sao Paulo, where CAD patients referred to the hospital for coronary angiography were evaluated.

Results

Forty patients with CAD (20 with SA and 20 with UA) were included in the study. Blood samples from LFPV and CS were collected before coronary angiography. Furthermore, analysis of the correlation between serum levels of hs-CRP in LFPV versus CS showed a strong linear correlation for both SA (r = 0.993, p < 0.001) and UA (r = 0.976, p < 0.001) and for the entire sample (r = 0.985, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Our data suggest a strong linear correlation between hs-CRP levels in LFPV versus CS in patients with SA and UA.

Myocardial ischaemia without obstructive coronary artery disease in rheumatoid arthritis: hypothesis-generating insights from a cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE

RA is associated with increased cardiovascular events, reportedly to equal diabetes mellitus (DM). The presence of myocardial ischaemia was assessed in asymptomatic high-risk RA patients and compared with patients with DM and a healthy control group.

METHODS

Eighteen consecutive non-diabetic RA patients without known cardiovascular disease who developed a new carotid atheromatic plaque during the last 3 years were matched 1:1 for traditional cardiovascular risk factors with asymptomatic type 2 DM patients and 1:2 with asymptomatic non-RA, non-DM control subjects. After dobutamine stress contrast echocardiography with wall-motion and perfusion evaluation, coronary angiography was performed in those with positive stress tests.

RESULTS

Ischaemia by echocardiography was found in 67% of RA patients; this was significantly higher than controls (31%, P = 0.019) but comparable to those with DM (78%, P = 0.71). Angiography performed in eight consenting RA patients was normal in four, revealed non-flow-limiting coronary atheromatic lesions in two and significant lesions in two patients. RA patients with ischaemia had CRP serum levels significantly higher by six-fold compared with those with normal stress echocardiography.

CONCLUSION

Asymptomatic RA patients may display myocardial ischaemia at similar levels to DM patients but with low prevalence of obstructive coronary artery disease. Microvascular abnormalities associated with increased inflammatory response may account for these findings. Their exact nature and significance require further evaluation.

Significance of characterization of non-culprit lesions: An underscored clinical problem

Sudden death or acute coronary syndromes are frequently the first manifestation of plaque rupture at non-culprit lesions. Thus, identification of high-risk non-culprit plaques may have significant impact on the prognosis of patients with coronary artery disease. At present a widely accepted diagnostic method to prospectively identify such 'high-risk' plaques is not available. Improved identification of high-risk plaques by novel imaging coronary modalities currently available is a goal of great importance since it will result in major decreases in coronary artery disease morbidity and mortality. Potential new treatments with systemic, regional, and local approaches have been proposed. In this review article we focus on common and different morphologic characteristics between culprit and non-culprit lesions, the natural history of non-culprit lesions, and potential methods to identify the high-risk lesions for future adverse cardiovascular events.