Management of menorrhagia in women with inherited bleeding disorders: general principles and use of desmopressin

Successful treatment of severe menorrhagia at menarche with recombinant factor VIIa in an adolescent girl with type III von Willebrand's disease

: Type III von Willebrand's disease (vWD) is an inherited bleeding disorder, which is frequently associated with menorrhagia in women. Treatment options include antifibrinolytics, desmopressin, von Willebrand factor/factor VIII concentrates and in intractable bleeding circumstances recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa). We present an adolescent case with type III vWD who had a menorrhagia at menarche that was refractory to the standard treatment and ultimately was treated with rFVIIa successfully.

Non-surgical interventions for treating heavy menstrual bleeding (menorrhagia) in women with bleeding disorders

BACKGROUND

Heavy menstrual bleeding without an organic lesion is mainly due to an imbalance of the various hormones which have a regulatory effect on the menstrual cycle. Another cause of heavy menstrual bleeding with no pelvic pathology, is the presence of an acquired or inherited bleeding disorder. The haemostatic system has a central role in controlling the amount and the duration of menstrual bleeding, thus abnormally prolonged or profuse bleeding does occur in most women affected by bleeding disorders. Whereas irregular, pre-menarchal or post-menopausal uterine bleeding is unusual in inherited or acquired haemorrhagic disorders, severe acute bleeding and heavy menstrual bleeding at menarche and chronic heavy menstrual bleeding during the entire reproductive life are common. This is an update of a previously published Cochrane Review.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the efficacy and safety of non-surgical interventions versus each other, placebo or no treatment for reducing menstrual blood loss in women with bleeding disorders.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis Haemoglobinopathies Trials Register (25 August 2016), Embase (May 2013), LILACS (February 2013) and the WHO International Clinical Trial registry (February 2013).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled studies of non-surgical interventions for treating heavy menstrual bleeding (menorrhagia) in women of reproductive age suffering from a congenital or acquired bleeding disorder.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed studies for inclusion, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias.

MAIN RESULTS

Three cross-over studies, with 175 women were included in the review. All three studies had an unclear risk of bias with regards to trial design and overall, the quality of evidence generated was judged to be poor.Two of the studies (n = 59) compared desmopressin (1-deamino-8-D-arginine vasopressin) with placebo. Menstrual blood loss was the primary outcome for both of these studies. Neither study found clear evidence of a difference between groups. The first of these reported a mean difference in menstrual blood loss in the desmopressin versus placebo group of 21.20 mL (95% confidence interval -19.00 to 61.50)The second study reported that even though there was an improvement of pictorial bleeding assessment chart scores with desmopressin and placebo when compared to pretreatment assessment, there was no clear evidence of difference in these scores when the two were compared to each other (results presented graphically, P = 0.51). The data from these studies could not be combined.The third study (n = 116) compared desmopressin with tranexamic acid (n = 116). This study found a decrease in pictorial bleeding assessment chart scores after both treatments as compared to baseline. The decrease in these scores was greater for tranexamic acid than for desmopressin, with a mean difference of 41.6 mL (95% confidence interval 19.6 to 63) (P < 0.0002).In relation to adverse events, across two studies, there was no clear evidence of a difference when placebo was compared to desmopressin, risk ratio 1.17 (95% confidence interval 0.41 to 3.34) . The same was also true when desmopressin was compared to tranexamic acid, risk ratio 1.17 (95% confidence interval 0.41 to 3.34).Only the study that compared desmopressin to tranexamic acid assessed quality of life. However, we are unable to present any data from this study, since no differences in this outcome between the two intervention groups were reported.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Evidence from randomised controlled studies on the effect of desmopressin when compared to placebo in reducing menstrual blood loss is very limited and inconclusive. Two studies, each with a very limited number of participants, have shown uncertain effects in menstrual blood loss and adverse effects. A non-randomised comparison in one of the studies points to the value of combining desmopressin and tranexamic acid, which needs to be tested in a formal randomised controlled study comparison.When tranexamic acid was compared to desmopressin, a single study showed a reduction in menstrual blood loss with tranexamic acid use compared to desmopressin.There is a need to evaluate non-surgical methods for treating of menorrhagia in women with bleeding disorders through randomised controlled studies. Such methods would be more acceptable than surgery for women wishing to retain their fertility. Given that women may need to use these treatments throughout their entire reproductive life, long-term side-effects should be evaluated.

The medical management of abnormal uterine bleeding in reproductive-aged women

In the treatment of women with abnormal uterine bleeding, once a thorough history, physical examination, and indicated imaging studies are performed and all significant structural causes are excluded, medical management is the first-line approach. Determining the acuity of the bleeding, the patient's medical history, assessing risk factors, and establishing a diagnosis will individualize their medical regimen. In acute abnormal uterine bleeding with a normal uterus, parenteral estrogen, a multidose combined oral contraceptive regimen, a multidose progestin-only regimen, and tranexamic acid are all viable options, given the appropriate clinical scenario. Heavy menstrual bleeding can be treated with a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system, combined oral contraceptives, continuous oral progestins, and tranexamic acid with high efficacy. Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs may be utilized with hormonal methods and tranexamic acid to decrease menstrual bleeding. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists are indicated in patients with leiomyoma and abnormal uterine bleeding in preparation for surgical interventions. In women with inherited bleeding disorders all hormonal methods as well as tranexamic acid can be used to treat abnormal uterine bleeding. Women on anticoagulation therapy should consider using progestin-only methods as well as a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist to treat their heavy menstrual bleeding. Given these myriad options for medical treatment of abnormal uterine bleeding, many patients may avoid surgical intervention.

Newly diagnosed immune thrombocytopenia: update on diagnosis and management

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) continues to intrigue pediatricians and hematologists alike. Patients can have a dramatic presentation with wide-spread bleeds over a few days. There is an aura and fear of intra-cranial hemorrhage that drives the physician to recommend and the patient's family to accept drug treatment. Difference of opinion among physicians in the recommendations for treatment is not uncommon, even though recent evidence-based guidelines recommend a conservative, observation-based approach for the majority of patients with newly diagnosed childhood ITP. It is important to note that a specific 'platelet cut-off count', is no longer suggested as an indication by itself to recommend drug therapy. The manuscript is an update on newly diagnosed ITP in children. Recent changes in definitions and recommendations for treatment are highlighted. Pros and cons of 1st line drugs, including corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulin and anti-D are listed. Adjunctive therapies for the management of epistaxis and menorrhagia are described. Role of splenic artery embolization and emergency splenectomy in the backdrop of severe thrombocytopenia is discussed. Realistic case scenarios, common errors and frequently asked questions are included for a practical and easy reading.

Pharmacological therapy for abnormal uterine bleeding

Pharmacological therapies for the treatment of abnormal uterine bleeding are effective and generally well tolerated. This review presents an evidence-based approach to medical therapy. Selection depends on the etiology and amount of bleeding, need for contraception or preservation of fertility, perimenopause status, and medication efficacy and adverse effects.Available nonhormonal agents include nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents, which reduce bleeding by 25% to 35% and improve dysmenorrhea through reduced prostaglandin levels; tranexamic acid, which inhibits plasminogen activator with a 40% to 60% reduction in menstrual blood loss; and intranasal desmopressin, which is an antifibrinolytic for women with an underlying bleeding disorder (eg, von Willebrand disease).Hormonal regimens cause the inhibition of endometrial growth. Cyclic progestogen therapy for 21 days results in a significant reduction in menstrual blood loss. Limited data suggest that oral contraceptives reduce menstrual blood loss by 40% to 50% with decreased breast tenderness and dysmenorrhea and a reduction in risk of uterine and ovarian cancer. The progestin-releasing intrauterine devices are effective up to 97% by 6 months and provide relief of dysmenorrhea and contraception. Long-acting progestogen injections produce amenorrhea and provide contraception but are associated with irregular spotting and reversible bone loss. Danazol leads to endometrial atrophy with a reduced menstrual loss; androgenic adverse effects may be lessened with lower doses or vaginal use. Gonadotrophin agonists lead to ovarian suppression and are used to shrink fibroids or the endometrium preoperatively but are limited by hypoestrogenic adverse events. Emergency use of parenteral conjugated estrogens has a 70% chance of stopping abnormal bleeding but an increased risk of thrombosis.

von Willebrand disease

von Willebrand disease is a common inherited bleeding disorder characterized by excessive mucocutaneous bleeding. Characteristic bleeding symptoms include epistaxis, easy bruising, oral cavity bleeding, menorrhagia, bleeding after dental extraction, surgery, and/or childbirth, and in severe cases, bleeding into joints and soft tissues. There are three subtypes: types 1 and 3 represent quantitative variants and type 2 is a group of four qualitative variants: (1) type 2A-characterized by defective von Willebrand factor-dependent platelet adhesion because of decreased high-molecular-weight von Willebrand factor multimers, (2) type 2B-caused by pathologically increased von Willebrand factor-platelet interactions, (3) type 2M-caused by decreased von Willebrand factor-platelet interactions not based on the loss of high-molecular-weight multimers, and (4) type 2N-characterized by reduced binding of von Willebrand factor to factor VIII. The diagnosis of von Willebrand disease requires specialized assays of von Willebrand factor and/or molecular genetic testing of von Willebrand factor. Severe bleeding episodes can be prevented or controlled with intravenous infusions of virally inactivated plasma-derived clotting factor concentrates containing both von Willebrand factor and factor VIII. Depending on the von Willebrand disease type, mild bleeding episodes usually respond to intravenous or subcutaneous treatment with desmopressin, a vasopressin analog. Other treatments that can reduce symptoms include fibrinolytic inhibitors and hormones for menorrhagia.

von Willebrand factor to the rescue

von Willebrand factor (VWF) is a large multimeric adhesive glycoprotein with complex roles in thrombosis and hemostasis. Abnormalities in VWF give rise to a variety of bleeding complications, known as von Willebrand disease (VWD), the most common inherited bleeding disorder in humans. Current treatment of VWD is based on the replacement of the deficient or dysfunctional protein either by endogenous release from endothelial Weibel-Palade bodies or by administration of plasma-derived VWF concentrates. During the last years, several efforts have been made to optimize existing therapies for VWD, but also to devise new approaches, such as inducing endogenous expression with interleukin-11, administering exogenous recombinant VWF, or introducing the protein via gene delivery. Clearly, the efficacy of any strategy will depend on several factors, including, for example, the quantity, activity, and stability of the delivered VWF. The inherent complexity of VWF biosynthesis, which involves extensive posttranslational processing, may be limiting in terms of producing active VWF outside of its native cellular sources. This review summarizes recent progress in the development of different treatment strategies for VWD, including those that are established and those that are at the experimental stage. Potential pitfalls and benefits of each strategy are discussed.

Optimizing treatment of von Willebrand disease by using phenotypic and molecular data

The wide clinical spectrum of von Willebrand disease (VWD), its complex pathophysiology and its classification into distinct quantitative (type 1 or type 3) and qualitative (type 2) types with further subtle distinctions have prevented most clinicians from establishing a straightforward approach to diagnosing and treating this inherited bleeding disorder. The results of studies involving large cohorts of patients with a wide range of bleeding manifestations and variable von Willebrand factor (VWF) reduction have recently become available. These data have allowed the proposal of minimal criteria for a clinically useful diagnosis and for differentiating patients with mild VWD from subjects with borderline or only slightly reduced VWF levels who will not benefit from a specific diagnosis. These criteria are based on measurement of VWF ristocetin cofactor (VWF:RCo), VWF antigen (VWF:Ag), factor VIII and a standardized bleeding score (BS). Demonstration of the inheritance of the disorder could help to classify patients for whom insufficient hemostatic challenges may produce a falsely reassuring BS (like in children). Using this approach, mild VWD appears to be mostly composed of type 1 cases. Complemented by the results of desmopressin trial infusion, these parameters form the basis for a clinically oriented classification of all forms of VWD and may be useful for selecting the best treatment according to the severity of the disease. Although few molecular data have revealed practical utility, there is no doubt that the clarification of the molecular pathophysiology of VWD has allowed the unification of this complex disorder into a simple conceptual framework. This framework underlies the proposed utilization of simple phenotypic markers for optimizing treatments in individual patients.