Psychometric evaluation of a patient-reported symptom assessment tool for adults with haemophilia (the HAEMO-SYM)

Long-term safety and efficacy results from the phase 3b, open-label, multicentre Continuation study of rurioctocog alfa pegol for prophylaxis in previously treated patients with severe haemophilia A

INTRODUCTION

Previous studies reported the efficacy and safety profile of extended half-life PEGylated recombinant factor VIII (FVIII) rurioctocog alfa pegol (TAK-660, SHP660, BAX 855) in preventing bleeding in haemophilia A patients.

AIM

This study evaluated long-term safety and efficacy of rurioctocog alfa pegol for prophylaxis and treatment of bleeding in previously treated children and adults.

METHODS

In this phase 3b, prospective, open-label, multicentre study (NCT01945593), eligible patients ≤ 75 years with severe haemophilia A (FVIII < 1%) received prophylactic rurioctocog alfa pegol in a fixed dose (FD, twice-weekly or less frequent) or pharmacokinetic (PK)-tailored dose regimen. Co-primary endpoints were incidence of confirmed FVIII inhibitory antibody development and spontaneous annualized bleed rate (ABR), analysed using a generalised linear model. Secondary endpoints included overall haemostatic efficacy, occurrence of adverse events and health-related quality of life (HRQoL).

RESULTS

Overall, 216 patients were included; mean (SD) age at enrolment was 22.8 (15.7) years. No patients developed confirmed FVIII inhibitors. The point estimate (95% CI) of mean spontaneous ABR was 1.20 (0.92-1.56) among 186 patients receiving twice-weekly FD prophylaxis and 0.96 (0.54-1.71) among 25 patients receiving PK-tailored prophylaxis. Overall haemostatic efficacy was rated good or excellent in 88.6% of all bleeds. No new safety signals were observed. Patients reported improvements in HRQoL measures of pain, and physical and mental well-being.

CONCLUSION

These results highlight the long-term safety and efficacy of rurioctocog alfa pegol prophylaxis in previously treated children and adults with severe haemophilia A, with a safety profile similar to previous studies and continuing ABR reduction.

How We Do Harm: Do Copyrighted Scales Benefit Research in the Developing World?

One of the most difficult challenges in carrying out global health research in the developing world is the issue of copyright protection of questionnaires. The current reality is that research in the developing world is often hampered by inadequate or even non-existent budgetary support. From our point of view, an additional hindrance to carrying out research in developing countries is the insistence by holders of questionnaire copyrights that they are paid for the use of their testing instruments. One adverse consequence of demands for compensation by copyright holders may be that worthwhile research is impeded or even prevented. It is argued that the practice of charging non-funded research projects for the use of copyrighted questionnaires denies inclusion of data on world minorities, and thus prevents the potential benefits that such data could provide. In this commentary, we focus on copyrighted instruments and the restrictions that they often represent for researchers in the developing world. More broadly, we argue that to the extent that research in the developing world is impeded by demands for developed world levels of compensation for the use of proprietary tests, the development of vital health programs that are designed to serve these populations can be adversely affected. Several strategies for rectifying inequities posed by current copyright policies are suggested for the promotion of health research in the developing world.

A new measure to assess pain in people with haemophilia: The Multidimensional Haemophilia Pain Questionnaire (MHPQ)

People with haemophilia (PWH) experience acute pain during joint bleeds and might develop chronic pain due to joint degeneration. However, there is a lack of standardized measures to comprehensively assess pain in PWH. This study aimed to develop a multidimensional questionnaire for haemophilia-related pain, the Multidimensional Haemophilia Pain Questionnaire (MHPQ), and to present initial validation data among adults.The questionnaire distinguishes between acute/chronic pain and queries about pain locations, duration, frequency, triggering factors, intensity, interference, strategies, specialists for pain management and satisfaction with treatment. An initial version was tested with 16 patients to ensure item comprehensibility and face validity. The final version was answered by 104 adults, with 82 (78.8%) reporting haemophilia-related pain in the previous year (mean age = 43.17; SD = 13.00). The non-response analysis revealed good item acceptability. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis (EFA/CFA), reliability (internal consistency, test-retest, inter-item and item-total correlations) and convergent validity were analysed for the intensity and interference dimensions of the questionnaire. A combined EFA with these two constructs supported a 2-factor structure distinguishing intensity (α = 0.88) from interference items (α = 0.91). CFA was tested for the interference dimension, demonstrating suitability for this sample. Item-total correlations were >0.30 on both dimensions and most inter-item correlations were <0.70. Test-retest reliability (n = 42) was good for intensity (r = 0.88) and interference (r = 0.73), and convergent validity was confirmed for most hypotheses (r>0.30).This questionnaire is a comprehensible tool, achieving a thorough assessment of relevant pain dimensions. The MHPQ can help guide treatment recommendations by highlighting relevant topics and contributing to more effective, integrated treatments.

Pegylated, full-length, recombinant factor VIII for prophylactic and on-demand treatment of severe hemophilia A

Current management of hemophilia A includes prophylaxis with factor VIII (FVIII) replacement every 2 to 3 days. BAX 855, Baxalta's pegylated full-length recombinant FVIII (rFVIII), was designed to increase half-life and, thus, reduce the frequency of prophylactic infusions while maintaining hemostatic efficacy. BAX 855 was evaluated in previously treated patients with severe hemophilia A who were aged 12 to 65 years. A phase 1 study compared the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of BAX 855 with that of licensed rFVIII (Advate). In a pivotal study, the annualized bleeding rate (ABR), PK parameters, and efficacy of bleeding treatment were assessed. In the phase 1 study, the mean half-life (T1/2) and the mean residence time of BAX 855 compared with Advate were 1.4- to 1.5-fold higher. These results were confirmed in the pivotal study. The pivotal study met its primary endpoint: Prophylaxis with BAX 855 resulted in an ABR that was significantly lower than half the ABR of on-demand treatment (P < .0001). The median ABR was 1.9, and 39.6% of compliant subjects had no bleeding episodes during prophylaxis, whereas subjects treated on-demand had a median ABR of 41.5. BAX 855 was also efficacious for the treatment of bleeding episodes, with 95.9% of bleeding episodes treated with 1 to 2 infusions and 96.1% having efficacy ratings of excellent/good. No FVIII inhibitory antibodies or safety signals were identified. These studies provide evidence that BAX 855 was safe and efficacious for on-demand treatment and prophylaxis administered twice weekly in patients with hemophilia A. The trials were registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01736475 and #NCT01599819.

Management of joint bleeding in hemophilia

Hemarthrosis, the hallmark of severe hemophilia, is the major cause of serious bleeding events, disability and reduced quality of life in patients with factor VIII or factor IX deficiency. Joint bleeding is one of the greatest challenges confronting individuals treating hemophilia, and its economic impact is enormous. This article reviews the current management of hemophilic joint bleeding and discusses the potential impact of novel therapies.

Implementing musculoskeletal outcome assessments in clinical practice

Standardized outcome measures allow us to be more objective when measuring the impact of therapy on persons with haemophilia. Many excellent measures have been developed for haemophilia - especially in the health domains of structure and function, and activities; excellent health status/health-related quality-of-life tools have also been developed for haemophilia. Studies from other disciplines suggest that the use of standardized outcome measures in daily practice leads to improvement in quality of care. Because of their potential complexity, measures must be chosen that are practical for use in clinic. Future research should be focussed on the best ways to implement the use of standardized outcome measures in haemophilia practice.