Viscoelastic testing in benign hematologic disorders: Clinical perspectives and future implications of point-of-care testing to assess hemostatic competence

Viscoelastic tests (VETs) have been used routinely for liver transplantation, cardiac surgery, and trauma, but only recently have found clinical utility in benign hematologic disorders. Therefore, guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of these disorders based on viscoelastic variables have been adapted from the existing transplant, cardiothoracic surgery, and trauma resuscitation literature. As a result, diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for benign hematologic disorders utilizing VETs are not uniform. Accordingly, even though there has been a recent increase in the utilization of VET for the diagnosis and treatment of such disorders, the literature is still in its early stages. Analysis of point-of-care viscoelastic tracings from benign hematologic disorders has the potential to allow prompt recognition of disease and to guide patient-specific intervention. Here we present a review describing the application of VETs to benign hematologic disorders.

Clinical utility of viscoelastic testing (TEG and ROTEM analyzers) in the management of old and new therapies for hemophilia

Hemophilia A and B are rare inherited bleeding disorders resulting from deficiency of coagulation factors VIII and IX respectively. In the past few decades, the field of hemophilia has witnessed pivotal management challenges and therapeutic advances. Routine coagulation and factor assays, while useful in the classification of severity and treatment monitoring in hemophilia patients, have been shown to be of limited use in managing clinical presentations and outcomes. This prompted the investigation of viscoelastic studies in hemophilia care, which have established their utility in various bleeding and thrombotic states. In this review, we will discuss and critically assess the current literature highlighting the use of viscoelastic studies in various aspects of hemophilia including the determination of clinical phenotype, management of patients with inhibitors, perioperative management, and monitoring of novel agents.

The future of bypassing agents for hemophilia with inhibitors in the era of novel agents

Bypassing agents are presently the standard of care for the treatment of bleeding episodes in patients with hemophilia and high-titer inhibitors and are also used for bleed prevention. Only two bypassing agents are available to patients, and these products trace their lineage to the 1970s (activated prothrombin complex concentrates) and the 1980s (recombinant factor VIIa). Given the limited repertoire of available products, clinicians have relied on experience, empirical observation, registry data and individualized care to improve clinical outcomes on a case-by-case basis. Research over the past two decades has culminated in a greatly improved understanding of human coagulation; resulting from this, new products have been developed that offer treatment options and mechanisms of actions that differ from current bypassing agents. The most advanced in clinical development is emicizumab, a bispecific antibody that mimics the function of FVIIIa in the intrinsic Xase complex and is indicated for once-weekly or every-other-week prophylactic dosing in inhibitor patients. Other non-traditional products in clinical development include fitusiran and antibodies directed against tissue factor pathway inhibitor. As non-factor-based therapies become more widely utilized over time, the use of bypassing agents may be expected to decrease; however, bypassing agents will remain essential for the foreseeable future. As such, clinical development of bypassing agents continues, with some products (e.g. eptacog beta) under regulatory review. In this review we examine the optimal use of bypassing agents and their mechanism of action. We also discuss newer products and how these might theoretically be administered in conjunction with traditional bypassing agents.

Pain and pain management in haemophilia

Joint pain is common in haemophilia and may be acute or chronic. Effective pain management in haemophilia is essential to reduce the burden that pain imposes on patients. However, the choice of appropriate pain-relieving measures is challenging, as there is a complex interplay of factors affecting pain perception. This can manifest as differences in patients’ experiences and response to pain, which require an individualized approach to pain management. Prophylaxis with factor replacement reduces the likelihood of bleeds and bleed-related pain, whereas on-demand therapy ensures rapid bleed resolution and pain relief. Although use of replacement or bypassing therapy is often the first intervention for pain, additional pain relief strategies may be required. There is an array of analgesic options, but consideration should be paid to the adverse effects of each class. Nevertheless, a combination of medications that act at different points in the pain pathway may be beneficial. Nonpharmacological measures may also help patients and include active coping strategies; rest, ice, compression, and elevation; complementary therapies; and physiotherapy. Joint aspiration may also reduce acute joint pain, and joint steroid injections may alleviate chronic pain. In the longer term, increasing use of prophylaxis or performing surgery may be necessary to reduce the burden of pain caused by the degenerative effects of repeated bleeds. Whichever treatment option is chosen, it is important to monitor pain and adjust patient management accordingly. Beyond specific pain management approaches, ongoing collaboration between multidisciplinary teams, which should include physiotherapists and pain specialists, may improve outcomes for patients.

Use of the UKHCDO Database for a postmarketing surveillance study of different doses of recombinant factor VIIa in haemophilia

INTRODUCTION

Recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) is recommended in Europe at standard (3 × 90 μg kg^-1 ) or high (1 × 270 μg kg^-1 ) doses. When granting the license for the high dose, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) requested postmarketing surveillance for thrombosis. This was conducted by the United Kingdom National Haemophilia Database (NHD) on behalf of Novo Nordisk and the EMA.

AIM

To assess the use and safety of rFVIIa utilizing prospective data collected by the NHD (1 January 2008 to 30 June 2011).

RESULTS

Data were obtained from 67 haemophilia A/B patients with inhibitors treated for 1057 bleeds and 31 acquired haemophilia patients treated for 70 bleeds. Initial rFVIIa dose was categorized post hoc as low (<90 μg kg^-1 ), intermediate (≥90-<180 μg kg^-1 ) or high (≥180-<270 or ≥270 μg kg^-1 ). For haemophilia A/B, high and lower initial rFVIIa dose was used for 38.4% and 51.4% of episodes, respectively, while for acquired haemophilia, the values were 11.4% and 77.1% respectively. Median initial doses were higher for haemophilia A/B (146.3 μg kg^-1 ) than acquired haemophilia (90.5 μg kg^-1 ). A single administration of rFVIIa was the most frequently used regimen for haemophilia A/B, in contrast with standard recommendations and previous reports. For acquired haemophilia, most episodes were treated with multiple doses. No adverse drug reactions or thromboembolic events were reported for any rFVIIa dose.

CONCLUSION

The novel use of a national database for postmarketing surveillance has demonstrated acceptable safety for all recommended doses of rFVIIa.

Rapid rFVIIa enhanced on-demand dosing in haemophilia inhibitor patients

Recombinant factor VII activated (rFVIIa) is a bypassing agent widely used in haemophilia A and B patients with antibodies against coagulation factors VIII or IX. When used according to the correct doses, rFVIIa may control bleeding, subclinical bleeding and rebleeding, avoiding the effect of neutralising inhibitors. Because of the fast action of the rFVIIa, haemostasis occurs promptly and enables a fast bleeding control with on-demand treatment in home or in surgical setting. Rapidity is also a distinguishing feature in preparation and injection of rFVIIa to cope the restraining times of busy patients and parents. The effective haemostatic activity of rFVIIa enables a sustained bleeding control, which is implemented with every other day (eod) administration and suited for enhanced on-demand therapy and short-term repeated infusions use of rFVIIa to prevent microhaemorrhages or rebleeding. Comprehensive appreciation of these pharmacological and pharmacodynamic' characteristics will likely be a further stimulus to the wider enhanced on-demand use of rFVIIa.

Predicting dosing advantages of factor VIIa variants with altered tissue factor-dependent and lipid-dependent activities

BACKGROUND

Recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) is an FX-cleaving coagulation enzyme licensed for the treatment of bleeding episodes in hemophiliacs with inhibitory antibodies. Even though the optimal dosing and comparative dose efficacy of rFVIIa remain poorly understood, genetic or chemical modifications of rFVIIa have been proposed, with the goal of achieving faster and longer hemostatic action. No ongoing trial is currently comparing rFVIIa variants with each other.

OBJECTIVES AND METHODS

We used mathematical modeling to compare the pharmacokinetics, dose-response (pharmacodynamics) and dose-effect duration (pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics) of rFVIIa variants to predict their optimal doses. The pharmacodynamic (PD) model of FXa generation by FVIIa in complexes with tissue factor (TF) and procoagulant lipids (PLs) was validated against published ex vivo and in vitro thrombin generation (TG) experiments. To compare variants' safety profiles, the highest non-thrombogenic doses were estimated from the clinical evidence reported for the licensed rFVIIa product.

RESULTS

The PD model correctly described the biphasic TF-dependent and PL-dependent dose response observed in TG experiments in vitro. The pharmacokinetic/PD simulations agreed with published ex vivo TG data for rFVIIa and the BAY 86-6150 variant, and explained the similar efficacies of a single dose of 270 μg kg(-1) (as reported in the literature) and repeated doses of 90 μg kg(-1) of unmodified rFVIIa. The duration of the simulated hemostatic effect after a single optimal dose was prolonged for rFVIIa variants with increased TF affinity or extended half-lives, but not for those with modulated PL activity.

CONCLUSIONS

Some modifications of the rFVIIa molecule may not translate into a prolonged hemostatic effect.

Progressive improvement in wound healing with increased therapy in haemophilia B mice

Previous work has shown that normalized haemostasis only at the time of an injury is not sufficient to promote optimal wound healing in haemophilia B (HB) mice. However, the duration of treatment required for optimal healing has not been established. The goal of these studies was to determine the effect of different durations of replacement or bypassing therapy [factor IX(FIX) or factor VIIa (FVIIa)] on wound healing parameters in a mouse model of HB. A dermal wound was placed on the back of HB mice. Animals were either untreated or pretreated and then subsequently treated for 3 days, 5 days, or 7 days with FIX or FVIIa. Wound area, time to wound healing, haematoma formation and iron deposition were measured. All treated animals showed shortened time to healing relative to untreated animals. Haematoma formation was prevented by treatment and bleeding into the wounds, measured by iron scores, was reduced by treatment. In addition, there was a progressive improvement in healing with 7 days of treatment more effective than 5 days which was more effective than 3 days. Replacement therapy with FIX had slightly shorter healing times than bypassing therapy with FVIIa. HB mice treated with FIX had slightly smaller wound area than untreated animals; by contrast, FVIIa-treated animals had much smaller wound areas that were close to the wound areas seen in wild-type animals. The data suggest that sustained therapy is required for normal wound healing.

Evidence supporting the use of recombinant activated factor VII in congenital bleeding disorders

BACKGROUND

Recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa, NovoSeven) was introduced in 1996 for the treatment of hemophilic patients with antibodies against coagulation factor VIII or IX.

OBJECTIVE

To review the evidence supporting the use of rFVIIa for the treatment of patients with congenital bleeding disorders.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

English-language databases were searched in September 2009 for reports of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the ability of rFVIIa to restore hemostasis in patients with congenital bleeding disorders.

RESULTS

Eight RCTs involving 256 hemophilic patients with antibodies against coagulation factors, also known as inhibitors, were identified. The evidence supporting the use of rFVIIa in these patients was weak with regard to dose, clinical setting, mode of administration, efficacy, and adverse events, given the limited sample size of each RCT and the heterogeneity of the studies.

CONCLUSION

The authors suggest that rFVIIa therapy in hemophilic patients with inhibitors should be based on the individual's ability to generate thrombin and form a clot, and not on the patient's weight alone. Therefore, assays for thrombin generation, such as whole-blood thromboelastography, have the potential to significantly improve the treatment of these patients.

Critical appraisal of the role of recombinant activated factor VII in the treatment of hemophilia patients with inhibitors

Hemophilia patients with inhibitors faced the constraint of inadequate treatment for several years before the era of recombinant factor VIIa (rFVII). Initially, rFVIIa was used in the compassionate-use programs. After a worldwide license was issued, more than 1.5 million doses were administered. Bleeding of joints and muscles was controlled effectively by means of an early home treatment program, with either a standard dose of 90 μg/kg every 2 to 3 hours for a few doses or a single dose of 270 μg/kg. For more serious bleeding episodes or minor surgery, an initial dose of 90 μg/kg was given every 2 hours for 24 to 48 hours followed by increased intervals of 3 to 6 hours according to the severity of bleeding and efficacy of bleeding control. In cases of major surgery such as orthopedic procedures, the same regimen can be applied except for a higher initial dose of 120 to 180 μg/kg. However, increasing the dose should be considered if there are unexpected bleeding complications since the half-life and clearance of rFVIIa differ between individuals. In addition, prophylaxis is administered to a small number of patients. Finally, the reported thromboembolic events found in hemophilia patients with inhibitors receiving rFVIIa are extremely low, much less than 1%.