Testing for HER2 in breast cancer

A meta-analysis on concordance between immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to detect HER2 gene overexpression in breast cancer

BACKGROUND

We performed this meta-analysis study to evaluate the concordance and discordance between immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in detecting HER2 alteration in human breast cancer.

METHODS

As a meta-analysis, the present study evaluated the available data from previous studies on the HER2 gene detected by IHC and FISH. To indicate the meta-analysis results, a forest plot was used.

RESULTS

We identified 172 citations, for which our inclusion criteria were met by 18 articles, representing 6629 cases. The overall concordance and discordance rate between IHC staining with score 0/1+ and FISH for detection failure of HER2 expression was 96 and 4 %, respectively. The present study showed that the overall proportion of FISH positive and negative rate for IHC score 2+ for detection of HER2 expression was 36 and 64 %, respectively; and 91 and 9 % for 3+ IHC scores.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study show that IHC score 0/1+ and 3+ cannot be completely considered as negative and positive breast cancer test, respectively. Therefore, we suggest a valid and complementary test, the same as FISH, to explore HER2 expression.

Assessment of HER-2 gene overexpression in Isfahan province breast cancer patients using Real Time RT-PCR and immunohistochemistry

PURPOSE

Overexpression of proto-oncogene HER-2 is one of the main molecular markers of breast cancer involved in prognosis and diagnosis and also in trastuzumab therapy. Thus, a request for the evaluation of HER-2 status in breast cancer has been increasing. The aim of our study was assessment of HER-2 overexpression in malignant and benign breast cancer specimens by Real Time RT-PCR technique and comparison of its results with IHC outcomes.

METHODS

Twenty benign and sixty malignant breast cancers in addition to fifteen normal breast tissue specimens were analyzed by Real Time RT-PCR method. Fresh tissue samples were disrupted by mortar and pestle. A syringe and a needle were used for complete homogenization of the tissues. The RNA was then isolated from the samples and converted to cDNA. A standard curve was initially plotted using BioEasy SYBR Green I and then all 95 specimens were studied by Real Time RT-PCR using 2(-ΔΔCt) method.

RESULTS

23.3% of 60 malignant specimens showed HER-2 overexpression, while all of the benign samples represented the normal expression level of HER-2 gene. The concordance rate between the results of Real Time RT-PCR and IHC was 86.6%.

CONCLUSION

Real Time RT-PCR method is an almost reliable technique and at least can be used as a complementary method for confirming IHC results. This is emanated from relatively high rate of concordance between outcomes of IHC test, as a routine method of detecting the HER-2 gene expression status, and Real Time RT-PCR technique.

Imaging EGFR and HER2 by PET and SPECT: a review

In an effort to discover a noninvasive method for predicting which cancer patients will benefit from therapy targeting the EGFR and HER2 proteins, a large body of the research has been conducted toward the development of PET and SPECT imaging agents, which selectively target these receptors. We provide a general overview of the advances made toward imaging EGFR and HER2, detailing the investigation of PET and SPECT imaging agents ranging in size from small molecules to monoclonal antibodies.

Effectiveness of silver-enhanced in situ hybridization for evaluating HER2 gene status in invasive breast carcinoma: a comparative study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

HER2 gene amplification occurs in breast cancers and has implications for treatment and prognosis. Recently, a new direct evaluation technique, silver enhanced in situ hybridization (SISH) was developed for evaluating HER2 gene status. This study was performed to evaluate the SISH technique for clinical use by comparing it to that of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC).

METHODS

We studied 543 cases of excised breast specimens diagnosed as invasive ductal carcinoma by IHC, FISH, and SISH using a tissue microarray. IHC, FISH, and SISH results were interpreted according to the American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guidelines. A total of seven English studies that reported the concordance rates of SISH and BDISH compared to FISH published before July 2011 were retrieved.

RESULTS

The consensus concordance rate between SISH and FISH was 96.69% (kappa value = 0.9175). The pooled sensitivity was 0.94 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.91-0.97], and the pooled specificity was 0.98 (95% CI = 0.96-099) in a meta-analysis of the retrieved studies and this study. Area under the receiver operating characteristics curve was 0.9906.

CONCLUSIONS

SISH technique is an effective modality and is comparable with FISH for evaluating HER2 gene amplification in patients with breast carcinoma.

Optical fiber-based in vivo quantification of growth factor receptors

BACKGROUND

Growth factor receptors such as epidermal growth factor receptor 1 and human epidermal growth receptor 2 (HER2) are overexpressed in certain cancer cells. Antibodies against these receptors (eg. cetuximab and transtuzumab [Herceptin]) have shown therapeutic value in cancer treatment. The existing methods for the quantification of these receptors in tumors involve immunohistochemistry or DNA quantification, both in extracted tissue samples. The goal of the study was to evaluate whether an optical fiber-based technique can be used to quantify the expression of multiple growth factor receptors simultaneously.

METHODS

The authors examined HER2 expression using the monoclonal antibody trastuzumab as a targeting ligand to test their system. They conjugated trastuzumab to 2 different Alexa Fluor dyes with different excitation and emission wavelengths. Two of the dye conjugates were subsequently injected intravenously into mice bearing HER2-expressing subcutaneous tumors. An optical fiber was then inserted into the tumor through a 30-gauge needle, and using a single laser beam as the excitation source, the fluorescence emitted by the 2 conjugates was identified and quantified by 2-photon optical fiber fluorescence.

RESULTS

The 2 conjugates bound to the HER2-expressing tumor competitively in a receptor-specific fashion, but they failed to bind to a similar cell tumor that did not express HER2. The concentration of the conjugate present in the tumor as determined by 2-photon optical fiber fluorescence was shown to serve as an index of the HER2 expression levels.

CONCLUSIONS

These studies offer a minimally invasive technique for the quantification of tumor receptors simultaneously.

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer

Introduction. Testing for human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 in breast cancer at the time of primary diagnosis is now the standard of care. Positivity for epidermal growth factor receptor-2 in breast cancer is a prognostic factor regarding tumor aggressiveness and a predictive factor for response to Herceptin. Accurate assessment is essential to ensure that all patients who may benefit from Herceptin are correctly identified. Assay method. The principal testing methods used for determination of epider?mal growth factor receptor-2 status are immunohistochemistry for protein over expression and in situ hybridization using either fluorescence or a chromogen. Immunohistochemical testing method allows identification of epidermal growth factor receptor-2 positive patients (3+) who may benefit from Herceptin therapy, whereas negative patients (0/1+) can be excluded. A proportion of specimens defined as equivocal by immunohistochemistry (2+) must be retested by in situ hybridization to determine their status. Chromogen in situ hybridization is a method for determination of gene amplification using a peroxidase-based chromogenic reaction, which can be viewed using a conventional bright field microscope and it determines the actual degree of gene amplification. Various factors can affect the results achieved with these assays, including the assay antibody/probe, the methodology and the experience of personnel. Many countries implemented national testing guidelines in an attempt to standardize testing procedures and make results more accurate. Conclusion. The key point underlined by this review is that whatever method is used to test HER2 status, the technology must be validated first, and there must be regular internal and external quality assurance procedures.

Simultaneous detection of TOP2A and HER2 gene amplification by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification in breast cancer

HER-2/neu gene amplification, found in certain subtypes of (breast-) cancers, is an independent prognostic factor of poor outcome and determines eligibility for systemic treatment with trastuzumab. TopoII alpha (TOP2A) gene amplification seems to be predictive of response to a class of cytostatic agents called TopoII inhibitors, which include the anthracyclines. The observed increased efficacy of anthracyclines in HER2-positive tumors is thought to arise from the close proximity of both genes on chromosome 17, where the TopoII amplification status will determine the anthracycline sensitivity. This study aimed to validate a new polymerase chain reaction-based test, called multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA), as a simple and quick method to simultaneously assess HER-2/neu and TopoII alpha gene amplification status in paraffin-embedded breast cancer samples. To this end, MLPA results were compared with TopoII alpha, HER2 chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH). We also assessed TopoII alpha protein expression by immunohistochemistry. Of 353 patients, 9% showed TopoII alpha amplification by MLPA and 13% of patients were HER2 amplified. TopoII alpha amplification was seen in 42% of HER2-amplified cases and showed no high level amplification without HER2 amplification. Eleven patients displayed TopoI alpha loss (3%). Concordance between MLPA and CISH was 91% for TopoII alpha and 96% for HER2. Correlation between amplification and overexpression of TopoII alpha was significant (P=0.035), but amplification did not always predict protein overexpression. Loss of the TopoII alpha gene was almost never associated with loss of its protein. In conclusion, MLPA is an easy and accurate method to simultaneously detect breast cancer HER-2/neu and TopoII alpha copy number status in paraffin-embedded tissue, and thus an attractive supplement or alternative to CISH.

Evaluation of and quality assurance in HER2 analysis in breast carcinomas from patients registered in Danish Breast Cancer Group (DBCG) in the period of 2002-2006. A nationwide study including correlation between HER-2 status and other prognostic variables

INTRODUCTION

In Denmark, analysis for HER2 is situated in the pathology laboratories dealing with breast pathology. The analysis was introduced during the late 1990's, and was gradually intensified in the following years up to now. The present study deals with the experience with the analysis during the last 5 years, from 2002 - 2006.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All patients, registered in DBCG (Danish Breast Cancer Group) and with a HER2-test were included. The analysis followed international recommendations, with an initial immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis with a semiquantitative grading of the reaction in four grades, 0 and 1+, defined as HER2-negative, 2+, equivocal and 3+, HER2-positive. In the 2+ group, a FISH-test was applied to identify the presence of gene amplification, defined as a ratio >/=2. We investigated the number of analyses performed, the number of positive cases and the relation between the result of IHC and the result of FISH. Furthermore we looked at the relation to other prognostic factors.

RESULTS

The number of analyses gradually increased during the years of investigation, from 30% of patients in 2002 to 71% in 2006. The increase was seen in all laboratories resulting in all laboratories but one having a substantial number of analyses. Sixty-two percent of all cases were HER2-negative, 18% were equivocal and 21% positive in the IHC-analysis. Of the 2+, equivocal cases, 23% had gene-amplification. Thus, 23% of patients were defined as HER2-positive and eligible for treatment with trastuzumab. There was a significant correlation to other prognostic factors. The results are in accordance with what is found elsewhere. The quality of the test is further assured by all laboratories participating in external quality assurance schemes.

Borderline HER‐2 breast cancer cases: Histochemical versus real‐time PCR analysis and impact of different cut‐off values

Seventy-one cases that had resulted borderline for HER-2 protein expression at conventional immunohistochemical assay (2+) were assessed for HER-2 gene amplification by real-time PCR and by FISH in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations (gene amplification with ratio >or=2 in both methods). Thirty-three out of 71 cases (47%) resulted amplified at real-time PCR analysis, whereas 15 cases resulted positive at FISH (21%). Apparently, PCR was more sensitive than FISH in HER-2 determination, only 10 cases resulting amplified in both tests. When the mean ratio value obtained in all PCR experiments was adopted as threshold in determining HER-2 gene amplification, the apparent sensitivity of PCR was reduced but correlation between PCR and FISH results was dramatically increased. Furthermore, when the mean PCR ratio value observed in the FISH-positive group was chosen as threshold, the best agreement between PCR and FISH results was achieved. Therefore, we found that the proposed threshold ratio value of >or=2 is not accurate in separating HER-2 amplified and non-amplified cases. We suggest that the threshold ratio value in PCR tests should be determined in each laboratory using FISH controlled cases. Finally, above certain in-lab generated threshold values, PCR might be proposed as a highly predictive positive test in HER-2 assessment.

ZAP-70 immunoreactivity is a prognostic marker of diseaseprogression in chronic lymphocytic leukemia

The expression of zeta-associated protein 70 (ZAP-70) in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) seems to correlate with the mutational status of the immunoglobulin heavy-chain variable-region genes, clinical course and patient prognosis. The aim was to determine the prognostic significance of the immunohistochemical expression of ZAP-70 protein in CLL by means of the long-term follow-up of 108 patients. This study identified 3 patterns of ZAP-70 immunoreactivity: negative (58 patients, 54%), weakly positive (20 patients, 18%) and strongly positive (30 patients, 28%). Overall, ZAP-70 immunoreactivity correlated with an abnormal karyotype ( p = 0.017), a lymphocyte doubling time (LDT) of <6 months ( p = 0.001) and <12 months ( p = 0.01), Rai II - IV and Binet B - C stage ( p = 0.013), the clinical need for chemotherapy ( p < 0.001) and the need for more than 1 chemotherapy line ( p < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that ZAP-70 immunoreactivity closely correlated with a shorter LDT ( p < 0.0001) and time from diagnosis to initial therapy ( p = 0.0001). The same significance was retained when the patients were stratified into the ZAP-70 immunoreactivity groups ( p < 0.0001). This study shows that ZAP-70 immunoreactivity can be a reliable prognostic marker in CLL and proposes a system for evaluating the results. The observations support the inclusion of the immunohistochemical expression of ZAP-70 in clinical trials involving CLL patients.

Real time RT-PCR approach for the evaluation of ERBB2 overexpression in breast cancer archival samples: a comparative study with FISH, SISH, and immunohistochemistry

We tested the reliability of real time reverse transcription polymerase chain reactions as an alternative method for the assessment of ERBB2 status in paraffin-embedded tissues of 83 patients with breast cancer and 20 non-neoplastic controls. PCR was also compared with the immunohistochemical (IHC) HercepTest score and with fluorescence (FISH) and silver (SISH) in-situ hybridization, in 42 selected cases. ERBB2 mRNA was overexpressed in 26/83 (31%) breast cancer samples, using a cutoff calculated as the mean value of the controls plus 3 SD or with the receiver operating curve. The PCR test showed a 96% sensitivity and a 100% specificity when compared with FISH, with an area under the receiver operating curve of 98.4%. Overexpression of ERBB2 at PCR was also significantly correlated with amplification in FISH (P<0.001, Mann-Whitney test) and in SISH (P<0.001, Mann-Whitney test), and with the IHC HercepTest scores 2 or 3 (P<0.001, Spearman rank correlation). FISH, SISH, and IHC were also compared with each other. ERBB2 amplification in FISH significantly correlated with that in SISH (P=0.002, chi test with a concordance of the 87%), but not with IHC HercepTest scores (P=0.214, chi test). Real time PCR is a reliable and cost-effective method for the assessment of ERBB2 status in archival breast cancer samples, compared with FISH. Its introduction in routine diagnostic pathology practice is feasible even if it requires amendments to the current clinical oncology protocols.

Comparative evaluation of non-informative HER-2 immunoreactions (2+) in breast carcinomas with FISH, CISH and QRT-PCR

The routine assessment of HER-2 expression can be affected by many immunohistological preanalytical and analytical variables. The evaluation of non-informative HER-2 tests, because of 2(+) scores, has been addressed in studies using in situ hybridization (fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) or chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH)). There are very few studies that additionally checked 2(+) cases by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (QRT-PCR). We analyzed totally 195 breast carcinoma cases, 70 of them showing 2(+) immunoreaction, with FISH/CISH and QRT-PCR. Confirmed amplification in 2(+) cases fell within the reported range (12.8% vs. 8-44%) and some of them showed lower mRNA levels indicating a genuine decrease of HER-2 protein as a mechanism for the non-informative score. In other cases, increased mRNA levels could be ascribed to HER-2 polysomy, verifying previous observations of immunohistologically detectable HER-2 polysomy. A remarkable subset of the 2(+) cases showed "normal" mRNA levels without amplification or polysomy and technical parameters as well as heterogeneity could be incriminated. The overall concordance of QRT-PCR and FISH was 93.8%, highest than most previously reported. Yet, the lack of clear cut-off mRNA values and the challenge of sample microdissection hinder QRT-PCR from claiming the status of a gold standard test for HER-2 evaluation.

HER2 status in breast cancer--an example of pharmacogenetic testing

The development of new drugs and associated pharmacogenetic tests will provide an increasing number of challenges to health care systems. In particular, how to evaluate their benefits, prioritize for commissioning purposes and implement a service to provide them in a timely manner. This paper presents an overview of HER2 testing for trastuzumab (Herceptin) treatment in breast cancer cases. Immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization laboratory techniques are described and their HER2 testing performances are compared. Future options for the national provision of HER2 testing by the National Health Service in the UK are also discussed.

HER2 status in breast cancer--an example of pharmacogenetic testing

The development of new drugs and associated pharmacogenetic tests will provide an increasing number of challenges to health care systems. In particular, how to evaluate their benefits, prioritize for commissioning purposes and implement a service to provide them in a timely manner. This paper presents an overview of HER2 testing for trastuzumab (Herceptin) treatment in breast cancer cases. Immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization laboratory techniques are described and their HER2 testing performances are compared. Future options for the national provision of HER2 testing by the National Health Service in the UK are also discussed.

Does polysomy of chromosome 17 have a role in ERBB2 and topoisomerase IIalpha expression? Gene, mRNA and protein expression: a comprehensive analysis

OBJECTIVES

ERBB2 is an oncogene with prognostic and predictive value. Topoisomerase IIalpha is an enzyme encoding close to the ERBB2 oncogene, that represents a molecular target for anthracyclines. An indirect mechanism of increasing ERBB2 and topoisomerase IIalpha gene copy number is chromosome 17 polysomy. The aim of the present study was to clarify the implication of polysomy 17 in ERBB2 and topoisomerase IIalpha expression. In addition, we assessed the relation of ERBB2 and topoisomerase IIalpha gene dosage to mRNA and protein levels.

METHODS

We selected 83 cases diagnosed as invasive breast cancer. We analysed ERBB2 and topoisomerase IIalpha genes, mRNA and protein by fluorescence in situ hybridisation, real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction and immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

We observed a progressive increase in mRNA expression from 0+ to 3+ and also a significant difference in the ERBB2 RNA levels between normal and amplified cases. We found that polysomy of chromosome 17 does not affect the ERBB2 expression and that topoisomerase IIalpha mRNA expression is not related to gene status.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrate that polysomy of chromosome 17 is not related to ERBB2 expression. Thereby, it is important to use centromeric probes to clearly discriminate between true ERBB2 gene amplification and polysomy of chromosome 17.

The intersection of biotechnology and pharmacogenomics: health policy implications

Increasing knowledge of the genetic basis of disease is changing the landscape of health care. Two critical aspects are growth in biotechnology and growth in personalized health care, particularly targeting medicines based on genetic information (pharmacogenomics). This paper provides an overview of the health policy implications of the integration of biotechnology and pharmacogenomics. I examine four factors that determine whether relevant technologies will be successfully adopted, using case studies for illustration. Key policy challenges include determining the appropriate role of policy in (1) providing incentives to develop socially beneficial interventions and (2) facilitating development of the evidence base.

Tissue microarray technology in breast cancer HER2 diagnostics

Tissue microarrays (TMAs) as current medical research tools significantly lower the costs of immunohistochemical examinations (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) while enabling high levels of standardization and reliability. Taking HER2 testing of breast cancer into consideration, we assessed the routine applicability of TMAs. A hundred and seventy-four consecutive samples of invasive breast cancer cases were selected. TMAs were constructed in order to conduct double HER2 immunohistochemical analysis and FISH abreast using the conventional slide by slide method. Comparing the immunohistochemical data obtained from TMAs with the routinely processed large sections, we found a 94.5%/92.7%, 85.7%/88.9% and 91.2%/90% concordance at immunohistochemically HER2-negative, HER2 2+ and 3+ cases using the CB11/HercepTest, respectively. FISH performed on TMAs helped to determine Herceptin therapy suitability in all cases, and when discordance was found, we controlled FISH on "large sections". Being able to conduct FISH examinations at a reasonable price with or without prior immunohistochemical analysis, departments confronted with a certain frequency of breast cancer cases might extensively use the type of TMAs applied in our study. This is a relieve not only with regard to diagnostic work using microarrays, but this also allows to take new directions in research by shedding light on certain unusual cases.

Molecular biomarkers for cancer detection in blood and bodily fluids

Cancer is a major and increasing public health problem worldwide. Traditionally, the diagnosis and staging of cancer, as well as the evaluation of response to therapy have been primarily based on morphology, with relatively few cancer biomarkers currently in use. Conventional biomarker studies have been focused on single genes or discrete pathways, but this approach has had limited success because of the complex and heterogeneous nature of many cancers. The completion of the human genome project and the development of new technologies have greatly facilitated the identification of biomarkers for assessment of cancer risk, early detection of primary cancers, monitoring cancer treatment, and detection of recurrence. This article reviews the various approaches used for development of such markers and describes markers of potential clinical interest in major types of cancer. Finally, we discuss the reasons why so few cancer biomarkers are currently available for clinical use.

HER2 evaluation using the novel rabbit monoclonal antibody SP3 and CISH in tissue microarrays of invasive breast carcinomas

BACKGROUND

Laboratory methods for HER2 assessment currently include immunohistochemical (IHC) methods (measuring protein overexpression) and fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) (measuring gene amplification). The measure of HER2 protein by IHC is usually assessed by the mouse monoclonal antibody CB11, and polyclonal antibodies (Herceptest) directed against the internal portion of the receptor. Recently, chromogenic in situ hybridisation (CISH), in which HER2 is detected by a peroxidase reaction and the gene amplification can be determined by regular bright-field microscopy, has emerged as an alternative to FISH.

AIMS

To evaluate the status of HER2 in tissue microarrays (TMAs) of invasive breast cancer using the novel rabbit monoclonal antibody SP3 directed against the external portion of HER2, and correlate the results with CB11 and CISH.

METHODS

IHC was performed with two antibodies (CB11 and SP3) and CISH for HER2 in 10 TMA blocks with 190 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded cases of invasive breast carcinomas.

RESULTS

The correlation between SP3 and CB11 was significant (p<0.001) with an agreement rate of 86.9%. When the staining pattern of the two antibodies was compared, the majority of SP3 immunostainings were assessed more easily, with a strong complete membrane staining pattern without non-specific cytoplasmic staining. There was a good correlation between SP3 and CISH (p<0.001). 23/24 SP3 3+ cases showed gene amplification, 97.3% of the cases without gene amplification were SP3 negative, and 6/7 SP3 2+ were amplified.

CONCLUSION

The high level of agreement between SP3, a monoclonal antibody that recognises the extracellular domain of the HER2 receptor, and CB11 and CISH, shows that this novel antibody is a reliable candidate to evaluate the expression of HER2 in breast cancer.

Clinicopathologic features and prognostic implications of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene copy number and protein expression in non-small cell lung cancer

Increased epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene copy numbers and mutations predict sensitivity to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the clinicopathologic features of EGFR gene copy status in NSCLC remain unclear. We retrospectively analyzed 262 cases of NSCLC, including 135 squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) and 112 adenocarcinomas (ADC), for which paraffin blocks of the resected primary lung mass were available. None had received EGFR-targeted therapy. EGFR gene copy number was evaluated using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and EGFR expression was determined immunohistochemically using a tissue microarray. A high EGFR gene copy (EGFR FISH-positive) was found in 30.2% of the cases (amplification in 11.1% and high polysomy in 19.1%). There was no significant difference in EGFR FISH status with respect to SCC and ADC histology. The EGFR FISH-positive rate was higher in non-smokers than in smokers in the multivariate analysis (p=0.012). EGFR expression was significantly associated with a high EGFR gene copy and SCC histology (p=0.000). In the univariate survival analysis, EGFR FISH-positivity predicted worse survival in SCC (p=0.059), especially stage I SCC (p=0.04). EGFR amplification was associated with a shorter survival in node-positive SCC (p=0.015). However, the EGFR gene copy number or protein expression had no influence on the prognosis of ADC. In conclusion, the EGFR FISH-positive rate in Korean patients with NSCLC was similar to rates in Western populations, unlike the higher frequencies of EGFR mutation in East Asians. A high EGFR gene copy number was significantly more common in non-smokers, as were EGFR mutations. A high EGFR gene copy number predicted worse survival in SCC; therefore, the prognostic implications of the EGFR gene and protein should be analyzed in the context of histology and staging in NSCLC.

EGFR overexpression in malignant pleural mesothelioma. An immunohistochemical and molecular study with clinico-pathological correlations

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is overexpressed in many epithelial malignancies, against which some antitumoral drugs have been developed. There is a lack of information as to EGFR expression in malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM), an aggressive and fatal cancer poorly responsive to current oncological treatments. Our aim was to: (a) compare EGFR immunohistochemical expression with mRNA levels measured by real time PCR; (b) assess the relationships between EGFR expression and clinico-pathological data including survival; (c) analyze the EGFR mutations. We developed an immunohistochemical method of EGFR evaluation based on the number of immunoreactive cells and staining intensity in 61 MPMs. EGFR immunoreactivity was documented in 34/61 (55.7%) cases. A significant correlation between EGFR protein and mRNA levels (p = 0.0077) was found, demonstrating the reliability of our quantification method of EGFR membrane expression. Radically resected patients (p = 0.005) and those with epithelial histotype (p = 0.048) showed an increased survival. No statistical correlation between EGFR immunoreactivity and patients survival was observed. No EGFR mutation was documented. This study documents EGFR overexpression in MPM at the protein and the transcriptional levels; it proposes a reliable method for EGFR expression evaluation in MPM. EGFR levels are not associated with clinico-pathological features of patients, including survival.

Gene expression profiling in breast cancer: towards individualising patient management

Breast cancer is a complex and clinically heterogeneous disease. The increase in knowledge of breast cancer biology has led to a number of clinical advances in the treatment of breast cancer, most notably the implementation of widespread mammography screening and advances in adjuvant treatment of early-stage disease. In the last 20 years, arrays of potential prognostic and/or predictive markers of breast cancer have been analysed. However, relatively few have proven to be clinically useful. To date, the only widely accepted markers for routine use in breast cancer are the oestrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor, HER-2 (c-erbB2/neu). Expression microarray technology and laser capture microdissection have now been employed to further our understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of breast cancer. Recently reported advances in array technology and RNA amplification methods are having a considerable impact in this field, allowing the analysis of pre-malignant and pre-invasive lesions. A number of studies have identified prognostic and predictive gene 'signatures', whose prediction of disease outcome and response to treatment is superior to conventional prognostic indicators. Despite major technological advances, a number of confounding issues remain concerning the potential clinical utility of gene expression profiling, including differences in study design, patient selection, array technology, chemistry, and methods of analysis. It seems likely, however, that following careful 'hypothesis driven' validation studies and clinical trials, expression profiling will be applied in the future to identify patient-specific disease profiles and provide rationale for individualised treatment. This review focuses on the current use and future potential of microarray profiling in breast cancer.

HER2 amplification status in breast cancer: a comparison between immunohistochemical staining and fluorescence in situ hybridisation using manual and automated quantitative image analysis scoring techniques

AIMS

To compare the results of breast cancer sections with HercepTesttrade mark immunohistochemistry (IHC) scores ranging from 0 to 3+ with fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) for HER2 amplification. The HER2 digital scoring application of the Micrometastasis Detection System (MDS) was used, together with manual scoring of FISH and HercepTest, to determine whether this system provides an accurate alternative.

METHODS

Paraffin wax embedded sections were stained using HercepTest and analysed by eye and automated quantitative image analysis. FISH was performed using the PathVysion fluorescent probe and scored by eye and automated quantitative image analysis using MDS.

RESULTS

Of 114 cases, 26% were amplified by FISH, whereas only 18% scored 3+; 32% of IHC 2+ cases were amplified by FISH, and one showed borderline amplification. Six percent of IHC negative cases (0 or 1+) were amplified by FISH, and one showed borderline amplification. Of IHC 3+ cases, 10% were non-amplified by FISH. Classification discrepancies were seen in 18% of HercepTest cases scored by eye and using the MDS system. MDS was consistent with visual FISH scoring and correctly differentiated most ambiguous visual IHC scores.

CONCLUSIONS

FISH provides a more accurate and consistent scoring system for determining HER2 amplification than HercepTest. The MDS system provides a reliable, consistent alternative to visual IHC and FISH scoring. IHC is still a valuable technique to aid in identification of isolated or heterogeneous tumour populations for subsequent FISH analysis, and a combined FISH and HercepTest approach to all breast cancer cases may be the most efficient strategy.