Usefulness of epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) to discriminate between perineural invasion and perineural indentation in prostatic carcinoma

The role of epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) overexpression in the prognosis of prostatic adenocarcinoma

Prostatic adenocarcinoma is the second-most common cancer in men and the fifth most common cause of cancer death. Its incidence increases with age; 75% of patients are 65 years and older. The aim of the study was to assess epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) expression in prostatic adenocarcinoma as a poor prognostic marker and its correlation to some pathological parameters. The formalin-fixed, paraffin-surrounded tissue blocks were retrospectively collected from 40 men diagnosed with prostate carcinoma. All cases were collected from Al Hilla Teaching Hospital and some private labs between October 2018 - November 2020, with ages ranging from 30-89 years. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS 22, frequency and percentage were used for categorical data, and Chi-square was used to evaluate connotation between variables. P-value ≤0.05 was significant. The blocks were sectioned for EMA immunohistochemical staining using monoclonal mouse anti-human EMA protein. EMA protein overexpression was detected in 75% (n=30/40) of prostatic adenocarcinoma cases. EMA expression showed no correlation with the patient's age (P=0.09) and a positive correlation with the cancer grade (P=0.003). In prostatic adenocarcinoma patients, EMA could be seen as a potential prognostic predictor for disease progression.

Perineural invasion detected in prostate biopsy is a predictor of positive surgical margin of radical prostatectomy specimen: A meta-analysis

The role of perineural invasion detected by puncture biopsy of prostate cancer remains controversial. We performed a meta-analysis to assess the relationship between positive perineural invasion at prostate biopsy and positive surgical margins (PSM) after radical prostatectomy. We searched a number of relevant electronic databases including Web of Science, Medline, PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library until 31 March 2021. STATA 15.1 software was used to analyse all data for this article. The quality of these studies was assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (ranged from 0 to 9 stars). Finally, we selected 13 high-quality studies in our meta-analysis, which contain 8283 patients. Overall pooled analysis proposed that biopsy perineural invasion was related to a higher risk of the positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy in prostate cancer (RR: 1.73; 95% CI: 1.56-1.92; z = 10.30, p = 0.000). Moreover, the outcomes of the publication bias checkout testified that without significant bias arose (Egger's test: 0.086 > 0.05; Begg's test: 0.59 > 0.05). The existing evidence indicates that higher incidence of positive surgical margins in patients who had perineural invasion was detected in prostate biopsy.

Perineural Invasion and Risk of Lethal Prostate Cancer

Background: Prostate cancer has a propensity to invade and grow along nerves, a phenomenon called perineural invasion (PNI). Recent studies suggest that the presence of PNI in prostate cancer has been associated with cancer aggressiveness.Methods: We investigated the association between PNI and lethal prostate cancer in untreated and treated prostate cancer cohorts: the Swedish Watchful Waiting Cohort of 615 men who underwent watchful waiting, and the U.S. Health Professionals Follow-Up Study of 849 men treated with radical prostatectomy. One pathologist performed a standardized histopathologic review assessing PNI and Gleason grade. Patients were followed from diagnosis until metastasis or death.Results: The prevalence of PNI was 7% and 44% in the untreated and treated cohorts, respectively. PNI was more common in high Gleason grade tumors in both cohorts. PNI was associated with enhanced tumor angiogenesis, but not tumor proliferation or apoptosis. In the Swedish study, PNI was associated with lethal prostate cancer [OR 7.4; 95% confidence interval (CI), 3.6-16.6; P < 0.001]. A positive, although not statistically significant, association persisted after adjustment for age, Gleason grade, and tumor volume (OR 1.9; 95% CI, 0.8-5.1; P = 0.17). In the U.S. study, PNI predicted lethal prostate cancer independent of clinical factors (HR 1.8; 95% CI, 1.0, 3.3; P =0.04).Conclusions: These data support the hypothesis that perineural invasion creates a microenvironment that promotes cancer aggressiveness.Impact: Our findings suggest that PNI should be a standardized component of histopathologic review, and highlights a mechanism underlying prostate cancer metastasis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 26(5); 719-26. ©2017 AACR.