Histopathological work-up and interpretation of sentinel lymph nodes removed for vulvar squamous cell carcinoma

Risk of Vulvar Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Lichen Sclerosus and Lichen Planus: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this study were to determine: 1) the prevalence of lichen sclerosus (LS) and lichen planus (LP) present in association with vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC), and 2) the incidence and absolute risk of developing VSCC in LS and LP.

METHODS

A search was performed of MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL databases. Three independent reviewers screened articles published before September 1, 2020, first on title/abstract and then on the full text. Women with a history of VSCC, human papillomavirus, smoking, or autoimmune disease were excluded. Newcastle-Ottawa observational study scales were used to assess the risk of bias and methodological quality of the included studies. Of the 3132 studies assessed, 31 were selected for analysis. Due to study heterogeneity, a qualitative synthesis was conducted.

RESULTS

The prevalence of LS and LP in association with VSCC ranged from 0% (95% CI 0-5) to 83% (95% CI 36-100) and 1% (95% CI 0-7) to 33% (95% CI 4-78), respectively. The incidence of VSCC ranged from 1.16 (95% CI 0.03-6.44) to 13.67 (95% CI 5.50-28.17) per 1000 person-years for LS. The absolute risk of developing VSCC in patients ranged from 0.0% (95% CI 0.0-5.52) to 21.88% (95% CI 9.28-39.97) with LS and was 1.16% (95% CI 0.1-4.1) with LP. Incidence was not calculable for LP owing to study characteristics.

CONCLUSIONS

This review provides evidence that there is an increased risk of developing VSCC in women with LS, while associations with LP are less clear. Early identification, treatment, and long-term follow-up are essential to prevent potential malignant progression of these vulvar dermatoses.

Use of the Sentinel Lymph Node Technique Compared to Complete Inguino-femoral Lymph Node Removal in Patients with Invasive Vulvar Cancer in Germany

In the current S2 guidelines, the standard surgical therapy for patients with vulvar cancer also includes inguino-femoral lymphadenectomy. However, in view of the severe side-effects associated with this approach such as problems with wound healing, lymphoceles and lymphoedema, the search is on for alternative treatments that could decrease treatment-associated morbidity and improve patients' quality of life, particularly for node-negative patients. The sentinel lymph node technique is currently the gold standard in the treatment of unifocal breast cancer (clinically negative axilla), and studies on the use of this technique in the treatment of vulvar cancer are promising. To date, the diagnostic accuracy of this method in vulvar cancer has only been evaluated in a single, one-arm, non-randomised, multicentre study. In preparation for a multicentre study, in 2010 we surveyed 41 German hospitals to investigate how often they used the sentinel lymph node technique compared to inguino-femoral lymphadenectomy. The hospitals were grouped according to hospital size and number of patients treated for vulvar cancer. The decision criteria to determine the type of procedure performed were also investigated. Finally, the hospitals were asked whether they would be willing to participate in a prospective clinical study to evaluate the sentinel lymph node technique in patients with vulvar cancer. The majority of surgeons questioned (73 %) already had some experience with this technique in patients with vulvar cancer. In our survey, 27 % of hospitals carried out inguino-femoral lymphadenectomy, 10 % used the sentinel lymph node technique, and 63 % used both methods. In 24 % of hospitals, the standard procedure consisted of the sentinel lymph node technique supplemented by inguino-femoral lymphadenectomy. Only 20 % of the institutions surveyed in our study carried out sentinel lymph node biopsy alone in accordance with the criteria of the consensus recommendations. The majority of the investigated institutions were willing to participate in a randomised prospective clinical study to evaluate the effectiveness of sentinel lymph node sampling in patients with vulvar cancer.

Estimation of groin recurrence risk in patients with squamous cell vulvar carcinoma by the assessment of marker gene expression in the lymph nodes

Background

Regional lymph node (LN) status is a well-known prognostic factor for vulvar carcinoma (VC) patients. Although the reliable LN assessment in VC is crucial, it presents significant diagnostic problems. We aimed to identify specific mRNA markers of VC dissemination in the LN and to address the feasibility of predicting the risk of nodal recurrence by the patterns of gene expression.

Methods

Sentinel and inguinal LN samples from 20 patients who had undergone surgery for stage T_1-3, N_0-2, M₀ primary vulvar squamous cell carcinoma were analyzed. Gene expression profiles were assessed in four metastatic [LN(+)] and four histologically negative [LN(−)] lymph node samples obtained from four VC patients, by the Affymetrix U133 Plus 2.0 gene expression microarrays. Of the set of genes of the highest expression in the metastatic LNs compared to LN(−), seven candidate marker genes were selected: PERP, S100A8, FABP5, SFN, CA12, JUP and CSTA, and the expression levels of these genes were further analyzed by the real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) in 71 LN samples.

Results

All of the seven genes in question were significantly increased in LN(+) compared to LN(−) samples. In the initial validation of the seven putative markers of metastatic LN, the Cox proportional hazard model pointed to SFN, CA12 and JUP expression to significantly relate to the time to groin recurrence in VC patients.

Conclusions

Our findings first provided evidence that SFN, CA12 and JUP have a potential of marker genes for the prediction of the groin recurrence LN in VC patients.

Current controversies in the management of patients with early-stage vulvar cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to outline current controversies in management of early-stage vulvar cancer. The main focus will be on the procedures for assessing the sentinel node and the treatment of those with evidence of metastatic involvement.

RECENT FINDINGS

Assessment of the sentinel node has recently been introduced into the standard treatment of early-stage squamous cell vulvar cancer. The combination of a radioactive tracer and blue dye is the most accurate technique for sentinel node detection. Preoperative imaging is recommended to rule out gross nodal involvement and ultrasound with fine needle aspiration cytology by an experienced radiologist appears to have the highest sensitivity/specificity for detecting metastases, although large comparative studies are not available. All patients with sentinel node metastases require additional treatment to the groin, independent of the size of metastasis in the sentinel node and currently this involves inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy. Further research is ongoing to investigate the role of radiotherapy instead of lymphadenectomy. The little experience there is of sentinel node biopsy in vulvar melanoma suggests that the procedure is feasible and inclusion criteria should follow those of cutaneous melanoma.

SUMMARY

Sentinel node biopsy is safe in treatment of early-stage vulvar cancer. Ongoing studies are investigating the optimal additional treatment for patients with a positive sentinel node in terms of efficacy and morbidity.