Effect of lactic acid treatment during processing on the sensory quality and lactic acid content of fresh broiler chickens

Effect of steam and lactic acid treatments on the survival of Salmonella Enteritidis and Campylobacter jejuni inoculated on chicken skin

Campylobacteriosis and salmonellosis are the most frequently reported zoonotic infectious diseases. The present work evaluated the effectiveness of steam treatment at 100 °C for 8s, a 5% lactic acid treatment for 1 min and their combination for inactivating Salmonella Enteritidis and Campylobacter jejuni inoculated on chicken skin. The impact of each treatment on the total aerobic mesophilic bacteria and the effect of rinsing after contact with lactic acid were also evaluated. Residual bacteria were counted immediately after treatment or after seven days of storage at 4 °C. Results demonstrated the immediate efficiency of the steam and the combined treatments with reductions of approximately 6 and 5 log cfu/cm2 respectively for S. Enteritidis and C. jejuni. They also showed significant reductions (equal to or >3.2 log cfu/cm2) in the total aerobic mesophilic plate count. Lactic acid had a persistent effect on pathogen growth during storage which was significantly higher when the skin was not rinsed, reaching reductions of 3.8 log cfu/cm2 for both S. Enteritidis and C. jejuni. Only the combined treatments significantly reduced the recovery of the total aerobic mesophilic bacteria during storage. The significant reductions in both pathogens and total aerobic mesophilic bacteria on treated chicken skins are possible ways to improve the safety and shelf life of the product although high levels of indigenous non-pathogenic bacteria may be beneficial due to their protective effect against potential re-contamination of chicken skin.

Decontamination of chicken skin surfaces inoculated with Listeria innocua, Salmonella enteritidis and Campylobacter jejuni by contact with a concentrated lactic acid solution

1. The aim was to establish how poultry skin could be efficiently decontaminated without changing its organoleptic properties. 2. Chicken skins were surface inoculated with Listeria innocua and treated with different acid solutions (2 and 10% lactic acid for 1 and 30 min). Surviving bacteria were enumerated immediately after treatment and after 7 d storage at 4 degrees C. 3. Reductions of up to 2.6 log were reached immediately after treatment. The treatment effect persisted for 7 d storage, when the reduction exceeded 4.59 log for the strongest treatment. 4. Residual levels of lactic acid were not significantly higher than in untreated controls, except for the strongest treatment. A tasting panel found no significant difference between controls and samples. 5. After the initial results, an apparently optimal treatment (5% lactic acid for 1 min) was applied on chicken skins' surface inoculated with a mix of Listeria innocua, Salmonella enteritidis and Campylobacter jejuni. Treatment efficacy was assessed immediately after treatment and after 1, 4 and 7 d storage. 6. This treatment seems to be very promising from a food processing standpoint, being fast and allowing decimal reductions of 2.00 log for Listeria innocua and 2.38 log for Salmonella enteritidis after 7 d storage, neither significantly increasing skin lactic acid nor causing any organoleptic modifications to the product. The effect of the treatment is significant after one day storage for Listeria innocua and after 4 d storage for Salmonella enteritidis.

Efficacy of lactic acid against Listeria monocytogenes attached to poultry skin during refrigerated storage

AIMS

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of lactic acid washing on the growth of Listeria monocytogenes on poultry legs stored at 4 degrees C for 7 days.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Fresh inoculated chicken legs were dipped into either a 0.11, 0.22 mol l(-1) or 0.55 mol l(-1) lactic acid solution for 5 min or distilled water (control). Surface pH values, sensorial characteristics and L. monocytogenes, mesophiles and pychrotrophs counts were evaluated after treatment (day 0) and after 1, 3, 5 and 7 days of storage at 4 degrees C. Legs washed with 0.55 mol l(-1) lactic acid for 5 min showed a significant (P < 0.05) inhibitory effect on L. monocytogenes compared with control legs, being about 1.74 log units lower in the first ones than in control legs after 7 days of storage. Sensory quality was not adversely affected by lactic acid, with the exception of colour.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatments with 0.55 mol l(-1) lactic acid reduced bacterial growth and preserved reasonable sensorial quality after storage at 4 degrees C for 7 days. However, it was observed a reduction in the colour score within 1 day post-treatment with 0.55 mol l(-1) lactic.

SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY

This study demonstrates that, while lactic acid did reduce populations of L. monocytogenes on poultry, it did not completely inactivate the pathogen. The application of lactic acid may be used as an additional hurdle contributing to extend the shelf-life of raw poultry.

The effects of potassium sorbate and lactic acid on the shelf-life of vacuum-packed chicken meats

In this research, the effects of 5% potassium sorbate (PS) and 3% lactic acid (LA) applications on total mesophylic aerobic bacteria, total psychrotrophic aerobic bacteria, lactic acid bacteria, staphylococci and coliform bacteria, pH values, thiobarbituric acid (TBA) numbers, and sensorial properties of vacuum-packed chicken leg and breast meats were investigated during storage at 4 +/- 1 C. In addition, residual sorbate was examined. A decrease in bacterial counts of chicken leg and breast meats was observed in the periods following the treatments of PS and LA; however, towards the end of the storage period, the effectiveness of PS was greater than that of LA. Although no effect was observed on pH values of samples treated with PS, LA caused a decrease in pH values in chicken meats. Both PS and LA treatments resulted in high TBA numbers. Although the shelf-life periods of samples treated with PS and LA were about 30 d, vacuum-packed controls and unsealed controls (both of which were untreated) lost their edibility on the 18th and the 6th d, respectively. Sensory analysis panel members could not distinguish between PS samples and control samples. However, samples containing LA had lower scores than others. Both PS and LA treatments were considered to be acceptable. Quantities of sorbic acid found in the samples treated with PS were below the Acceptable Daily Intake established by the Food and Agriculture Organization/World Health Organization.