Some patterns of disturbed behaviour in a closed ward environment

Characteristics and outcomes of patients admitted to the first psychiatric intensive care unit in Egypt

Background

Psychiatric intensive care units (PICU) have become an essential part of psychiatric hospital design worldwide, there are few published data about their effectiveness.

Aim

In this study, the characteristics and outcomes of 50 Egyptian patients admitted to the first PICU in the Middle East region between April 2015 and October 2018 were retrospectively examined.

Setting

The study was conducted at the Institute of Psychiatry, Ain Shams University.

Methods

Data on patients in PICU at the Institute of Psychiatry, Ain Shams University, were collected retrospectively and analysed and included information on previous psychiatric contact, diagnoses, causes of admission and outcomes. Continuous and categorical variables were subjected to statistical analyses.

Results

The majority of patients in PICU were of female gender, having a diagnosis of schizophrenia. The most common reason for admission to the PICU is the management of delirium, followed by catatonia. The average length of patients’ stays in PICU ranged from half a day to 16 days. Immediate outcome differed where the majority of patients (47 patients, 94%) were discharged to the inpatient psychiatric ward.

Conclusion

This study reviewed practice in the first PICU in Cairo, Egypt, over 3 years, showing the importance of ongoing evaluations of patient populations in providing the best clinical practice; the typical PICU patient is likely to be: female, suffering from schizophrenia or bipolar affective disorder (BAD). The most common reason for PICU admission is for the management of delirium followed by catatonia.

Safewards: the empirical basis of the model and a critical appraisal

ACCESSIBLE SUMMARY

In the previous paper we described a model explaining differences in rates of conflict and containment between wards, grouping causal factors into six domains: the staff team, the physical environment, outside hospital, the patient community, patient characteristics and the regulatory framework. This paper reviews and evaluates the evidence for the model from previously published research. The model is supported, but the evidence is not very strong. More research using more rigorous methods is required in order to confirm or improve this model.

ABSTRACT

In a previous paper, we described a proposed model explaining differences in rates of conflict (aggression, absconding, self-harm, etc.) and containment (seclusion, special observation, manual restraint, etc.). The Safewards Model identified six originating domains as sources of conflict and containment: the patient community, patient characteristics, the regulatory framework, the staff team, the physical environment, and outside hospital. In this paper, we assemble the evidence underpinning the inclusion of these six domains, drawing upon a wide ranging review of the literature across all conflict and containment items; our own programme of research; and reasoned thinking. There is good evidence that the six domains are important in conflict and containment generation. Specific claims about single items within those domains are more difficult to support with convincing evidence, although the weight of evidence does vary between items and between different types of conflict behaviour or containment method. The Safewards Model is supported by the evidence, but that evidence is not particularly strong. There is a dearth of rigorous outcome studies and trials in this area, and an excess of descriptive studies. The model allows the generation of a number of different interventions in order to reduce rates of conflict and containment, and properly conducted trials are now needed to test its validity.

Psychiatric intensive care units: a literature review

BACKGROUND

Psychiatric Intensive Care Units (PICU) have been part of most inpatient psychiatric services for some time, although information about their functioning and outcome has not previously been collated.

AIM

To conduct a systematic literature review to assess the current state of knowledge about such services.

METHOD

A search of electronic databases was undertaken, followed by obtaining additional references from items obtained.

RESULTS

Over 50 papers in English containing some empirical data were identified. Most studies were retrospective. Typical PICU patients are male, younger, single, unemployed, suffering from schizophrenia or mania, from a Black Caribbean or African background, legally detained, with a forensic history. The most common reason for admission is for aggression management, and most patients stay a week or less. Evidence of the efficacy of PICU care is very poor.

CONCLUSIONS

Most research so far has been small scale, and more substantial work using better methodologies is clearly required.

Should patients who assault staff be prosecuted?

This article discusses the issue of prosecution of mentally disordered patients particularly in relation to assaults or acts of violence in health care settings. The arguments for prosecuting those responsible for committing acts of dangerous behaviour are discussed, as are the arguments against prosecution and some of the possible reasons why this is a contentious area of discussion. There are significant risks to the integrity of mental health services if the consideration of prosecution as a strategy to reduce risk of violence in hospitals does not become an area of meaningful discussion at all levels. The risk of violence is real, but the risks of accepting it without taking measures to reduce the frequency or severity of violence is no less acceptable than accepting that burglary is inevitable and leaving one's front door ajar every day. Health care professionals may wish to consider that in the absence of a clinically based solution or ownership of the problem, the risk of an organizational response to this sensitive area, perhaps guided or driven by political concerns is likely, as has happened in areas such as risk assessment, treatability and compliance with treatment.

Absconding: a literature review

Incidents of absconding from inpatient care are high-risk events which have been linked to serious harm to self and others. This paper brings together for the first time findings from a disparate body of research literature spanning many years. Varied definitions of absconding and methods of calculating the rates of absconding make comparisons between studies difficult. Nevertheless, it is clear that absconders are more often young, male, from disadvantaged groups, and suffering from schizophrenia, compared to admissions generally. Roughly half of the abscondings take place while the patient is temporarily off the ward with permission, the remainder of absconding patients use an assortment of means to make their escape. A large variety of reasons for absconding have been elicited from patients or advanced as possibilities by researchers. Only six evaluative studies of interventions impacting upon absconding have been reported in the literature, but no firm conclusions can be drawn from them.

Characteristics of effective nursing interventions in the management of challenging behaviour

A combination of semi-structured interviews and participant observation were used in order to investigate the interventions used by psychiatric nurses when faced with challenging behaviour. The study described 10 such categories of effective interventions: confirming messages, personal control, staff honesty, providing face-saving alternatives, setting limits, use of structure, facilitating expression, monitoring, timing and calming, and non-verbal skills. The report concludes by suggesting that these categories can be used to provide a structure for the analysis of critical incidents from a nursing perspective.

ASSAULTIVE BEHAVIOR: Does Provocation Begin in the Front Office?

1. Provocation is an important risk predictor because these issues can be recognized, assessed, and appropriate interventions can be implemented to reduce the associated risks. It is only by the reduction of such "non-fixed" risk factors that any reduction of assaults can be accomplished. 2. Involuntary admission, patients with dementia or organic brain disorder, physical or verbal limits, staff attitude, denial of the possibility of assaults, and the educational level and clinical experience of the staff may help provoke an assaultive episode. 3. An important step is assessing the assault to identify provocation due to certain medical causes, and to document the extent of degeneration in patients with dementia or organic brain disorder. Medical intervention would be indicated and would appropriately address the causes of some violent episodes.