Involvement of nurses in physician-assisted dying

Professional experiences of formal healthcare providers in the provision of medical assistance in dying (MAiD): A scoping review

OBJECTIVE

This scoping review describes the existing literature which examines the breadth of healthcare providers' (HCP's) experiences with the provision of medical assistance in dying (MAiD).

METHOD

This study employed a scoping review methodology: (1) identify research articles, (2) identify relevant studies, (3) select studies based on inclusion/exclusion criteria, (4) chart the data, and (5) summarize the results.

RESULTS

In total, 30 papers were identified pertaining to HCP's experiences of providing MAiD. Fifty-three percent of the papers were from Europe (n = 16) and 40% of studies were from the USA or Canada (n = 12). The most common participant populations were physicians (n = 17) and nurses (n = 12). This scoping review found that HCPs experienced a variety of emotional responses to providing or providing support to MAiD. Some HCPs experienced positive emotions through helping patients at the end of the patient's life. Still other HCPs experienced very intense and negative emotions such as immense internal moral conflict. HCPs from various professions were involved in various aspects of MAiD provision such as responding to initial requests for MAiD, supporting patients and families, nursing support during MAiD, and the administration of medications to end of life.

SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS

This review consolidates many of the experiences of HCPs in relation to the provision of MAiD. Specifically, this review elucidates many of the emotions that HCPs experience through participation in MAiD. In addition to describing the emotional experiences, this review highlights some of the roles that HCPs participate in with relation to MAiD. Finally, this review accentuates the importance of team supports and self-care for all team members in the provision of MAiD regardless of their degree of involvement.

[Practice of euthanasia among physicians and nurses in German hospitals]

Hintergrund  Aktive Sterbehilfe und ärztlich assistierter Suizid werden in Deutschland kontrovers diskutiert. Empirische Studien fehlen, um ihr jeweiliges Vorkommen, einschließlich dem von passiver und indirekter Sterbehilfe, in deutschen Krankenhäusern einschätzen zu können. Ärztinnen und Ärzte sowie Pflegerinnen und Pfleger in deutschen Krankhäusern wurden zu ihrer Anwendung von Sterbehilfe befragt und mögliche Einflussfaktoren erhoben.

Methode  Angaben zu Sterbehilfe wurden mit deskriptiven Begriffen und zugeordneten Definitionen in einer anonymen Online-Befragung erhoben. Die objektive und subjektive Arbeitssituation der Befragten und ihre Befürwortung von aktiver Sterbehilfe wurden erfasst. Die finale ärztliche Stichprobe umfasste n = 2507, die pflegerische Stichprobe umfasste n = 2683 Personen.

Ergebnis  Die Anwendung von passiver und indirekter Sterbehilfe innerhalb von 24 Monaten wurde von einem großen Anteil der ärztlichen und pflegerischen Befragten angegeben, aktive Sterbehilfe und assistierter Suizid von deutlich weniger Befragten. Die Varianz in der Anwendung von aktiver Sterbehilfe wurde u. a. durch mehrere arbeitsbezogene Faktoren und die jeweilige Befürwortung von aktiver Sterbehilfe beeinflusst, nicht aber durch subjektive Belastungsfaktoren.

Schlussfolgerung  Sterbehilfe wird durch ärztliche und pflegerische Mitarbeiterinnen und Mitarbeiter in deutschen Krankenhäusern praktiziert. Das Vorkommen unterschiedlicher Formen von Sterbehilfe und relevante Einflussfaktoren werden vor dem Hintergrund methodischer Limitationen diskutiert.

Involvement of Nurses in the Euthanasia Care Process in Flanders (Belgium): An exploration of Two Perspectives

This study explored nurses’ involvement in the care process for mentally competent, terminally ill patients requesting euthanasia in general hospitals in Flanders, Belgium. In-depth interviews with 18 nurses who had experience in caring for patients requesting euthanasia since May 2002 were analyzed using grounded theory qualitative methods. We found that the involvement of nurses in the care process is influenced by their predominant perspective on it: the procedural, action-focused perspective, from which good practical organization of the care process is essential; or the existential-interpretative perspective, from which it is important to understand the patient's request within a dialogue-focused and communicational atmosphere. Findings show that the two perspectives are not mutually exclusive, but rather complementary dimensions of the euthanasia care process. Hence, sufficient support for nurses to reach a well-balanced integration of both perspectives is essential.

Implementation of Medical Assistance in Dying: A Scoping Review of Health Care Providers' Perspectives

RESEARCH AIMS

With the growing interest in Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD), understanding health care professionals' roles and experiences in handling requests is necessary to evaluate the quality, consistency, and efficacy of current practices. This scoping review sought to map the existing literature on health care providers' perspectives of their involvement in MAiD.

METHODS

A scoping review was conducted to address the following: 1) What are the roles of diverse health care professionals in the provision of MAiD? and 2) What professional challenges arise when confronted with MAiD requests? A literature search in electronic databases and gray literature sources was performed. Articles were screened, and a thematic content analysis synthesized key findings.

RESULTS

After evaluating 1715 citations and 148 full-text papers, 33 articles were included. Perspectives of nurses (n = 10), physicians (n = 7), mental health providers (n = 7), pharmacists (n = 4), social workers (n = 3), and medical examiners (n = 1) were explored. Professional roles included consulting/supporting patients and/or other staff members with requests, assessing eligibility, administering/dispensing the lethal drugs, providing aftercare to bereaved relatives, and regulatory oversight. Challenges included lack of clear guidelines/protocols, role ambiguity, evaluating capacity/consent, conscientious objection, and lack of interprofessional collaboration.

CONCLUSION

Evidence from various jurisdictions highlighted a need for clear guidelines and protocols that define each profession's role, scope of practice, and legal boundaries for MAiD. Comprehensive models of care that incorporate multidisciplinary teams alongside improved clinician education may be effective to support MAiD implementation. Little is known about health care providers' perspectives in handling requests, especially outside physician practice and nursing.

Indian Nurses’ Attitudes Toward Euthanasia

The debate about euthanasia continues worldwide, with nurses’ attitudes becoming increasingly more important. The aim of this study is to investigate gender differences among nurses’ perceptions of attitudes toward euthanasia. A nonprobability quantitative, cross-sectional design was carried out among nurses working at a tertiary care center. Data were collected through self-reported questionnaires at their work place. Significant differences were found between men and women to the items such as “Fear of death shows differences due to religious beliefs” (χ2 = 10.550, p < 0.05), “If patient wants euthanasia, nutrition support should be stopped” (χ2 = 12.209, p < 0.05), “CPR should not be applied in case of sudden respiration and heart stop” (χ2 = 9.591, p < 0.05), and “burden for relatives to take care of a patient who is in terminal period and who will die” (χ2 = 9.069, p < 0.05). The present study depicts that gender plays an important role in euthanasia; hence, the researchers strongly suggest that there is an urgent need to draft uniform guidelines after wide consultation with all the stake holders regarding nurses’ role in taking care of patients who request euthanasia, to face these situations effectively and competently within professional boundaries.

Palliative care professionals' willingness to perform euthanasia or physician assisted suicide

Background

Euthanasia and physician assisted suicide (PAS) are highly debated upon particularly in the light of medical advancement and an aging society. Little is known about the professionals’ willingness to perform these practices particularly among those engaged in the field of palliative care and pain management. Thus a study was performed among those professionals.

Methods

An anonymous questionnaire was handed out to all participants of a palliative care congress and a pain symposium in 2013. The questionnaire consisted of 8 questions regarding end of life decisions. Proposed patient vignettes were used.

Results

A total of 470 eligible questionnaires were returned, 198 by physicians, 272 by nurses. The response rate was 64 %. The majority of professionals were reluctant to perform euthanasia or PAS: 5.3 % of the respondents would be willing to perform euthanasia on a patient with a terminal illness if asked to do so. The reluctance grew in case of a patient with a non-terminal illness. The respondents were more willing to perform PAS than euthanasia. Nurses were more reluctant to take action as opposed to the physicians. The majority of the respondents would attempt to treat the patient’s symptoms first before considering life-ending measures. As regards any decision making process the majority would consult with a colleague.

Conclusions

This is the first German study to ask about the willingness of professionals to take action as regards euthanasia and PAS without biased phrasing. As opposed to the general acceptance that is respectively high, the actual willingness to perform life-ending measures is low. The German debate on physician assisted suicide and its possible legalization should also incorporate clarifications regarding the responsibility who should eventually perform these acts.

Psychosocial determinants of nurses’ intention to practise euthanasia in palliative care

Background:

Most studies on euthanasia fail to explain the intentions of health professionals when faced with performing euthanasia and are atheoretical.

Research objective:

The purpose of this study was to identify the psychosocial determinants of nurses’ intention to practise euthanasia in palliative care if it were legalised.

Research design:

A cross-sectional study using a validated anonymous questionnaire based on an extended version of the Theory of Planned Behaviour.

Participants and research context:

A random sample of 445 nurses from the province of Quebec, Canada, was selected for participation in the study.

Ethical considerations:

The study was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Centre hospitalier universitaire de Québec.

Findings:

The response rate was 44.2% and the mean score for intention was 4.61 ± 1.90 (range: 1–7). The determinants of intention were the subjective (odds ratio = 3.08; 95% confidence interval: 1.50–6.35) and moral (odds ratio = 2.95; 95% confidence interval: 1.58–5.49) norms. Specific beliefs which could discriminate nurses according to their level of intention were identified.

Discussion:

Overall, nurses have a slightly positive intention to practise euthanasia. Their family approval seems particularly important and also the approval of their medical colleagues. Nurses’ moral norm was related to beneficence, an ethical principle.

Conclusion:

To our knowledge, this is the first study to identify nurses’ motivations to practise euthanasia in palliative care using a validated psychosocial theory. It also has the distinction of identifying the ethical principles underlying nurses’ moral norm and intention.

Euthanasia: the perceptions of nurses in India

Euthanasia provokes controversies in various domains, such as the moral, ethical, legal, religious, scientific, and economic. India legalised passive euthanasia (withdrawal of life support) for patients with brain death or who are in a permanent vegetative state in 2011, but research on perceptions of euthanasia among people in India is limited. This study aimed to examine nurses' perceptions of the practice of euthanasia as well as factors influencing those perceptions. A non-probability quantitative, cross-sectional design was adopted for a sample of 214 nurses working at a tertiary care centre. Data was collected through self-reported questionnaires at the nurses workplace.The findings revealed mixed opinions on euthanasia among the nurses. However, the majority of the participants did not agree with the practice of euthanasia. Nonetheless, further research is needed on this issue across the country among various health professionals in the context of current legislation.

Social-cultural factors in end-of-life care in Belgium: a scoping of the research literature

BACKGROUND

As end-of-life (EoL) care expands across Europe and the world, service developments are increasingly studied. The sociocultural context in which such changes take place, however, is often neglected in research.

AIM

To explore sociocultural factors in EoL care in Belgium as represented by the literature.

DESIGN

A scoping of the empirical research literature following a systematic search procedure with a focus on thematic analysis based on the literature findings.

DATA SOURCES

Searches were carried out in eight electronic databases, five journals, reference lists, and grey literature (through September 2010). Articles informing about sociocultural issues in EoL care were included.

RESULTS

One hundred and fifteen original studies met the inclusion criteria, the majority (107) published between 2000 and 2010. Four major themes were: Setting; Caregivers; Communication; and Medical EoL Decisions (the largest category). Minority Ethnic Groups was an emerging theme. Gaps included: research in Wallonia and Brussels; the role and experiences of informal caregivers; issues of access to palliative care; and experiences of minority ethnic groups. There was a paucity of in-depth qualitative studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Various sociocultural factors influence the provision of EoL care in Belgium. This country provides a unique opportunity to witness how euthanasia is put into practice when legalized, in a context where palliative care is also highly developed and where many health care institutions have Catholic affiliation, providing an important example to others. Attention to how the sociocultural context affects EoL care adds to the current evidence base of service provision, which is essential in the further development of EoL care.

Culture and end of life care: a scoping exercise in seven European countries

AIM

Culture is becoming increasingly important in relation to end of life (EoL) care in a context of globalization, migration and European integration. We explore and compare socio-cultural issues that shape EoL care in seven European countries and critically appraise the existing research evidence on cultural issues in EoL care generated in the different countries.

METHODS

We scoped the literature for Germany, Norway, Belgium, The Netherlands, Spain, Italy and Portugal, carrying out electronic searches in 16 international and country-specific databases and handsearches in 17 journals, bibliographies of relevant papers and webpages. We analysed the literature which was unearthed, in its entirety and by type (reviews, original studies, opinion pieces) and conducted quantitative analyses for each country and across countries. Qualitative techniques generated themes and sub-themes.

RESULTS

A total of 868 papers were reviewed. The following themes facilitated cross-country comparison: setting, caregivers, communication, medical EoL decisions, minority ethnic groups, and knowledge, attitudes and values of death and care. The frequencies of themes varied considerably between countries. Sub-themes reflected issues characteristic for specific countries (e.g. culture-specific disclosure in the southern European countries). The work from the seven European countries concentrates on cultural traditions and identities, and there was almost no evidence on ethnic minorities.

CONCLUSION

This scoping review is the first comparative exploration of the cultural differences in the understanding of EoL care in these countries. The diverse body of evidence that was identified on socio-cultural issues in EoL care, reflects clearly distinguishable national cultures of EoL care, with differences in meaning, priorities, and expertise in each country. The diverse ways that EoL care is understood and practised forms a necessary part of what constitutes best evidence for the improvement of EoL care in the future.

The role of nurses in physician-assisted deaths in Belgium

BACKGROUND

Belgium's law on euthanasia allows only physicians to perform the act. We investigated the involvement of nurses in the decision-making and in the preparation and administration of life-ending drugs with a patient's explicit request (euthanasia) or without an explicit request. We also examined factors associated with these deaths.

METHODS

In 2007, we surveyed 1678 nurses who, in an earlier survey, had reported caring for one or more patients who received a potential life-ending decision within the year before the survey. Eligible nurses were surveyed about their most recent case.

RESULTS

The response rate was 76%. Overall, 128 nurses reported having cared for a patient who received euthanasia and 120 for a patient who received life-ending drugs without his or her explicit request. Respectively, 64% (75/117) and 69% (81/118) of these nurses were involved in the physician's decision-making process. More often this entailed an exchange of information on the patient's condition or the patient's or relatives' wishes (45% [34/117] and 51% [41/118]) than sharing in the decision-making (24% [18/117] and 31% [25/118]). The life-ending drugs were administered by the nurse in 12% of the cases of euthanasia, as compared with 45% of the cases of assisted death without an explicit request. In both types of assisted death, the nurses acted on the physician's orders but mostly in the physician's absence. Factors significantly associated with a nurse administering the life-ending drugs included being a male nurse working in a hospital (odds ratio [OR] 40.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] 7.37-217.79) and the patient being over 80 years old (OR 5.57, 95% CI 1.98-15.70).

INTERPRETATION

By administering the life-ending drugs in some of the cases of euthanasia, and in almost half of the cases without an explicit request from the patient, the nurses in our study operated beyond the legal margins of their profession.

Nurses' attitudes towards end-of-life decisions in medical practice: a nationwide study in Flanders, Belgium

We investigated on a nationwide level the attitudes of nurses towards end-of-life decisions (ELDs) that may hasten death and towards their role in those decisions. We took a representative random sample of 6000 nurses in Flanders, Belgium. Response rate was 62.5%. Most nurses agreed with the practice of withholding/withdrawing potentially life-prolonging treatments (93%), with decisions to alleviate symptoms with possible life-shortening side effects (96%) and with the practice of euthanasia (92%). Their support for the different decisions existed regardless of whether they had cared for terminally ill patients or not. Most nurses also thought that they have an important role to play especially in the ELD-making process. Nurses' views on their proper role in the administration of drugs in euthanasia and continuous deep sedation showed a large dispersal. Overall, nurses' work setting determines their opinions on nurses' role in ELDs. In conclusion, nurses accept a wide variety of ELDs being practiced with terminally ill patients.

Euthanasia in Greece: Greek nurses' involvement and beliefs

Euthanasia has become a prominent social and ethical issue in which nurses play an important role. This study evaluated, for the first time in Greece, the acceptance and enactment of passive euthanasia among Greek nursing staff, measured in relation to the type of patients cared for. Passive euthanasia, illegal in Greece, is defined as either withdrawing or withholding life-sustaining treatment. Fifty-one per cent responded that they would not be willing to withhold life-sustaining treatment if legalized, while almost 30% responded that they had withheld life-sustaining treatment from a patient at least once in the past; specifically 47.7% of intensive care unit nurses (OR 8.2; 95% CI: 1.6-41.3), 20% of cancer ward nurses (OR 2.7; 95% CI: 0.5-15.6) and 8.3% of other nurses from other wards (P = 0.001). Age, gender and self-reported levels of religiosity among Greek nurses were not found to affect statistically any variable regarding euthanasia and its enactment.

Cuidados paliativos: interfaces, conflitos e necessidades

O tipo de assistência prestado para pacientes com doenças avançadas e terminais tem sido objeto de intenso debate na literatura especializada. Este artigo descreve e analisa, a partir de revisão da literatura, as intervenções possíveis no fim da vida, com especial ênfase aos cuidados paliativos, um modelo em expansão no mundo. Analisa, a partir de uma perspectiva bioética, alguns dos aspectos moralmente relevantes que envolvem estas práticas, que tendem a ser conflituosas entre si, e, especificamente, dentro do campo dos cuidados paliativos, destaca certas dificuldades e desafios em torno da centralidade da autonomia, considerada um dos pilares para boas práticas de cuidados no fim da vida.

Perception of Palliative Care and Euthanasia Among Recently Graduated and Experienced Nurses

Palliative care and euthanasia have become the subject of ethical and political debate in Poland. However, the voice of nurses is rarely heard. The aim of this study is to explore the perception of palliative care and euthanasia among recent university bachelor degree graduates and experienced nurses in Poland. Specific objectives include: self-assessment of the understanding of these terms, recognition of clinical cases, potential acceptability of euthanasia, and an evaluation of attitudes towards palliative care and euthanasia. This is an exploratory study. A convenience sample of 206 recent graduates and 252 experienced nurse practitioners were interviewed. A structured questionnaire was used for collecting and interpreting data. Subjective perception of the terms `palliative care' and `euthanasia' was high and consistent with the recognition of clinical cases. The majority of the nurses excluded euthanasia from palliative care. They recognized personal philosophy of life as the most influential factor affecting attitudes towards euthanasia. The importance of the law was valued more highly by the experienced nurses.

Factors related to the involvement of nurses in medical end-of-life decisions in Belgium: A death certificate study

BACKGROUND

Although nurses play an important role in end-of-life care for patients, they are not systematically involved in end-of-life decisions with a possible or certain life-shortening effect (ELDs). Until now we know little about factors relating to the involvement of nurses in these decisions.

OBJECTIVE

To explore which patient- and decision-characteristics are related to the consultation of nurses and to the administering of life-ending drugs by nurses in actual ELDs in institutions and home care, as reported by physicians.

METHOD

We sampled at random 5005 of all registered deaths in the second half of 2001--before euthanasia was legalized--in Flanders, Belgium. We mailed anonymous questionnaires to physicians who signed the death certificates and asked them to report on ELDs, including nurses' involvement.

RESULTS

Response rate was 59% (n=2950). Physicians reported nurses involved in decision making more often in institutions than at home, and more often in care homes for the elderly than in hospitals (OR 1.70, 95% CI 1.15, 2.52). This involvement was more frequently when physicians intended to hasten the patient's death than when they had no such intention (institutions: OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.41, 2.99; home: OR 2.04, 95% CI 1.19, 3.49). In institutions, this involvement was also more likely where patients were of lower rather than higher education (OR 2.95, 95% CI 1.49, 5.84). The administering of life-ending drugs by nurses, as reported by physicians was also found more frequently in institutions than at home, and in institutions more frequently with lower rather than higher educated patients (p=.037).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings raise questions about physicians' perception of the nurse's role in ELDs, but also about physicians' skills in interacting with all patients. Education and guidelines for physicians and nurses are needed to optimize good communication and to promote a clearer assignment of responsibilities concerning the execution of those decisions.

Euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide in the Dutch homecare sector: the role of the district nurse

AIM

This paper is a report of the findings of a study into the role of district nurses in euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide in homecare organizations, conducted as part of a study into the role of nurses in medical end-of-life decisions.

BACKGROUND

Issues concerning legislation and regulation with respect to the role of nurses in euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide gave the Minister for Health reason to commission a study into the role of nurses in medical end-of-life decisions in hospitals, nursing homes and homecare organizations. This is the first quantitative study from the perspective of nurses. Previous quantitative studies were conducted under physicians and information on the role of nurses was obtained indirectly.

METHOD

A questionnaire was sent in 2003 to 500 district nurses employed in 55 homecare organizations. The absolute response rate was 86.0% and 81.6% (408) could be used for analysis.

RESULTS

In 22.3% of 278 cases, the district nurse was the first with whom patients discussed their request for euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide. In about half (49.8%) of 267 cases nurses were not involved in the general practitioner's decision-making process, and in only 13.3% of 264 cases, did they attend the administration of the lethal drugs. District nurses had provided some degree of aftercare to the surviving relatives in 80.3% of 264 cases.

CONCLUSION

Collaboration between general practitioners and district nurses needs improvement, particularly in relation to decision-making. Our Dutch data could help nurses in other countries to define their (future) role in euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide.

Practices of responsibility and nurses during the euthanasia programs of Nazi Germany: A discussion paper

In this paper, we focus on the contexts of moral decision-making by nurses in the euthanasia programs of Nazi Germany between 1939 and 1945 using Urban Walker's philosophical model. We use the second hypothesis of this model, that morality consists of practices of responsibility, to give an analysis of the understandings nurses had of their responsibilities in the euthanasia programs. The article starts with a brief introduction to the euthanasia programs of Nazi Germany from 1939 to 1945 and nurse participation, to illustrate how the responsibilities of nurses were manipulated. Secondly, nursing as moral practices are analysed in the context of the euthanasia programs that implement commonly shared understandings and practices of responsibility. Thirdly, the reasons that nurses gave for avoiding any responsibilities are examined. Fourthly, it is examined if nurses took any responsibility in the euthanasia programs. In conclusion, this paper discusses three points of relevance such a reflection on moral responsibility in the context of Nazi Germany has for nurses today who may be confronted with euthanasia.

Nursing involvement in euthanasia: how sound is the philosophical support?

Preference utilitarians are concerned to maximize the autonomous choices of individuals; for this reason, they argue that nurses ought to advocate for those patients who desire assistance with ending their lives. This approach prompts us to consider, then, the moral validity of nursing involvement in measures intended to end the lives of patients. In this article, the terms of preference utilitarianism are set out and considered in order to determine whether this approach offers sufficient philosophical support for sanctioning a role for nursing in euthanasia. Ultimately, it is found that preference utilitarianism is lacking in this respect, as well as in its fitness for guiding nursing activity in general. In particular, it is found that nurses are required to exchange a handmaiden relationship with the medical profession for an equally undignified relationship with patients. If nursing involvement in measures intended to end the lives of patients is to find sufficient philosophical support, then we need to look elsewhere.

Prevalence of patients with do-not-resuscitate status on acute geriatric wards in Flanders, Belgium

BACKGROUND

Elderly hospitalized patients have low survival rates after cardiopulmonary resuscitation, especially in the long term. This study aims to investigate the prevalence of patients with do-not-resuscitate (DNR) status on acute geriatric wards and the characteristics of the preceding decision-making process.

METHODS

On all 94 geriatric wards in Flanders, Belgium (2002), the geriatrician who performed the bulk of clinical work was asked to fill in a retrospective structured mail questionnaire.

RESULTS

The response rate was 72.3%. A DNR status was attributed to 20.3% of patients. A significant higher prevalence of patients with DNR status was found on wards with a geriatrician who had been active in patient care for 15 years or less and on wards with a DNR policy. Mostly, DNR status was attributed when the patient's condition declined (34.0%) or became critical (29.0%). Geriatricians consulted at least one person in 81.0% of the cases: (head) nurses in 72.2%, next of kin in 61.9%, the patient's general practitioner in 22.6%, and the patient him- or herself in 15.7%. Reasons stated to make a DNR decision were the prognosis (68.1%) and the physical condition of the patient (62.2%). Age was mentioned in only 21.1% of the cases, always in combination with other reasons.

CONCLUSIONS

One fifth of patients on acute geriatric wards in Flanders have DNR status. The decision to attribute DNR status is most often made late in the course of the disease. (Head) nurses and the patient's next of kin are often consulted, the patient and his or her general practitioner rarely.

Israeli critical care nurses' attitudes toward physician-assisted dying

BACKGROUND

Within critical care, end-of life decisions are common, including hastening of the dying process. One type of hastening the dying process is physician-assisted dying (PAD).

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to determine Israeli critical care nurses' attitudes and practices toward PAD.

METHODS

A convenience sample of 71 intensive care unit nurses were asked to fill out a modified critical care, Hebrew version of the Nurse's Attitudes Regarding Physician-Assisted Dying Questionnaire. Subjects were also asked whether they were requested or whether they performed actions to hasten the dying process.

RESULTS

The majority of nurses supported PAD. However, only 10% of the respondents agreed to participate when PAD was to be administered by the nurse. Some nurses were asked by patients (12.7%) and/or by families (7.0%) to hasten the dying process. No nurse reported administering any lethal treatment. No significant differences in responses to the vignettes were found based on gender, marital status, place of birth or parents' place of birth, religion, age, type of education, having taken a post-basic course, years of general or intensive care unit nursing experience, or type of intensive care unit. However, significant differences were found in four vignettes based on level of self-perceived religiosity.

CONCLUSION

The findings demonstrated that the Israeli critical care nurses sampled tended to agree with the concept of PAD but were unlikely to agree to having a more active role in hastening the dying process. This particular finding was true especially among those nurses who considered themselves more religious.

Nurses' involvement in 'do not resuscitate' decisions on acute elder care wards

AIM

This paper reports the involvement of nurses in 'do not resuscitate' decision-making on acute elder care wards and their adherence to such decisions in the case of an actual cardiopulmonary arrest.

BACKGROUND

Previous literature showed that nurses are involved in half or less than half of 'do not resuscitate' decisions in hospitals, but their involvement in this decision-making on acute elder care wards in particular has not been investigated.

METHOD

A questionnaire was sent in 2002 to the head nurses of all acute elder care wards in Flanders, Belgium (n = 94). They were asked whether nurses had been involved in the last 'do not resuscitate' decision-making process on their ward and whether nurses 'never', 'rarely', 'sometimes', 'often' or 'always' started resuscitation in case of cardiopulmonary arrest of patients with 'do not resuscitate' status and of those without.

RESULTS

The response rate was 86.2% (n = 81). In 74.7% of the last 'do not resuscitate' decisions on acute elder care wards in Flanders, a nurse was involved in the decision-making process. For patients with 'do not resuscitate' status, 54.3% of respondents reported that cardiopulmonary resuscitation was 'never' started on their ward, 'rarely' on 39.5% and 'sometimes' on 6.2%. For patients without 'do not resuscitate' status, nurses started cardiopulmonary resuscitation 'rarely' or 'sometimes' on 22.2% of all wards, and 'often' or 'always' on 77.8%.

CONCLUSION

To make appropriate 'do not resuscitate' decisions and to avoid rash decision-making in cases of actual cardiopulmonary arrest, nurses should be involved early in 'do not resuscitate' decision-making. If institutional 'do not resuscitate' guidelines were to stress more clearly the important role of nurses in all kinds of end-of-life decisions, this might improve the 'do not resuscitate' decision-making process.

Role of nurses in institutional ethics policies on euthanasia

AIM

This paper reports the findings of a survey that investigated whether Flemish Catholic hospitals and nursing homes had developed written ethics policies on euthanasia and how the role of nurses was described in these policies.

BACKGROUND

International research shows undeniably that nurses are confronted with patients requesting euthanasia. Euthanasia has been legal in Belgium since 2002 and in Holland since 2001. Because of the vagueness in formal documents and policies on the role of nurses in euthanasia, there is an increasing need to establish institutional ethics policies that clearly describe the role of nurses in the euthanasia process.

METHODS

We used a cross-sectional descriptive mail questionnaire to survey the general directors of Catholic hospitals and nursing homes in Belgium (Flanders). Data were collected between October 2003 and February 2004.

RESULTS

Of the 298 institutions targeted for survey, 81% of hospitals, 62% of nursing homes returned completed questionnaires. Of these, 79% of the hospitals and 30% of the nursing homes had a written ethics policy on euthanasia. The ethics policies of 87% of the hospitals and 77% of the nursing homes explicitly addressed the role of nurses in the euthanasia process. In the majority of hospitals and nursing homes, the ethics policies addressed the conscientious objections of nurses to euthanasia. Most hospitals and nursing homes voluntarily communicated their ethics policies to the nurses they employed.

CONCLUSION

The written ethics policies of most Catholic healthcare institutions give explicit attention to the role of nurses in the euthanasia process. However, the meaning and content of the role of nurses, as indicated in these ethics policies, continue to be an issue. Further research is needed to verify how these policies are actually implemented within the institutions and whether they contribute to better support for nurses and to ethical care for patients.

Involvement of nurses in caring for patients requesting euthanasia in Flanders (Belgium): A qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Although nurses worldwide are confronted with euthanasia requests, how nurses experience their involvement in euthanasia remains unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To explore nurses' involvement in the care for patients requesting euthanasia.

DESIGN

A qualitative grounded theory strategy.

SETTING

Two general hospitals (A, B) and a palliative care setting in Flanders (Belgium).

PARTICIPANTS

Nurses who fulfilled the following inclusion criteria: (a) Dutch-speaking; (b) working for at least one year in hospital A or B; (c) working at least part-time (50%); and (d) ever received a euthanasia request. We collected data using purposeful sampling, superseded by theoretical sampling in a palliative care setting. The sample included one intensive care nurse, one oncology nurse, eight palliative care nurses, and five internal medicine nurses. All but five were women. Their age ranged from 24 to 49 years.

METHODS

We conducted one-on-one semi-structured interviews between November 2001 and September 2002. Grounded theory was applied for guiding data collection and analysis. The trustworthiness of data was ensured by several strategies.

RESULTS

Although euthanasia was still illegal, the nurses unanimously stated that they had an important role in caring for patients requesting euthanasia. Their personal and intense involvement caused them to experience a spectrum of emotions, chief among them being a sense of powerlessness. Several elements contributed to the nurses' conflicted involvement. Nurses became frustrated if the context (e.g., lack of time) hindered their efforts to provide compassionate care. The palliative care setting and its associated culture (group mentality, care philosophy) created the opportunity for nurses to take time to holistically support patients and their relatives.

CONCLUSIONS

Hospital nurses are confronted with patients' euthanasia requests. Each stage of this process requires that the nurses possess specific competencies. Their willingness to personally care for these patients, in addition to their specific care expertise, allows them to be skilled companions.

Human dignity in the Nazi era: implications for contemporary bioethics

BACKGROUND

The justification for Nazi programs involving involuntary euthanasia, forced sterilisation, eugenics and human experimentation were strongly influenced by views about human dignity. The historical development of these views should be examined today because discussions of human worth and value are integral to medical ethics and bioethics. We should learn lessons from how human dignity came to be so distorted to avoid repetition of similar distortions.

DISCUSSION

Social Darwinism was foremost amongst the philosophies impacting views of human dignity in the decades leading up to Nazi power in Germany. Charles Darwin's evolutionary theory was quickly applied to human beings and social structure. The term 'survival of the fittest' was coined and seen to be applicable to humans. Belief in the inherent dignity of all humans was rejected by social Darwinists. Influential authors of the day proclaimed that an individual's worth and value were to be determined functionally and materialistically. The popularity of such views ideologically prepared German doctors and nurses to accept Nazi social policies promoting survival of only the fittest humans.A historical survey reveals five general presuppositions that strongly impacted medical ethics in the Nazi era. These same five beliefs are being promoted in different ways in contemporary bioethical discourse. Ethical controversies surrounding human embryos revolve around determinations of their moral status. Economic pressures force individuals and societies to examine whether some people's lives are no longer worth living. Human dignity is again being seen as a relative trait found in certain humans, not something inherent. These views strongly impact what is taken to be acceptable within medical ethics.

SUMMARY

Five beliefs central to social Darwinism will be examined in light of their influence on current discussions in medical ethics and bioethics. Acceptance of these during the Nazi era proved destructive to many humans. Their widespread acceptance today would similarly lead to much human death and suffering. A different ethic is needed which views human dignity as inherent to all human individuals.

The use of drugs with a life-shortening effect in end-of-life care in neonates and infants

OBJECTIVE

The purpose was to describe the use of drugs with a possible or certain life-shortening effect in end-of-life care in infants and to evaluate the possibly lethal effect.

DESIGN

For 292/298 deaths of live born infants (<1 year), in a 1-year period (between 1 August 1999 and 31 July 2000) in Flanders, Belgium, the attending physician could be identified and was sent an anonymous questionnaire. The questionnaires relating to deaths directly preceded by the administration of drugs were reviewed by a multi-disciplinary panel.

RESULTS

The response rate was 86.6% (253/292). In 57 cases (22.5%), drugs were administered directly before death. In 17/57 cases, the physician explicitly intended to hasten death. In 16/17 cases information about the drug(s) was available: opioids were administered in 14, a muscle relaxant in 5 and potassium chloride in 3 cases. In 13 cases where the lethal effect could be evaluated, the panel judged that the drugs were effective in hastening death in 10 cases. In most cases the estimated life-shortening was <24 h. In 40/57 cases the physician administered drugs to alleviate pain and/or symptoms, taking into account a possible life-shortening effect without explicitly intending it. Opioids were administered in all 30 cases where information about the drug(s) was supplied. In 13 cases the lethal effect could be evaluated, and in 6 cases the panel judged that the drugs had hastened death.

CONCLUSIONS

When life-shortening was explicitly intended, (dosages of) drugs were likely to be lethal. Drugs administered also clearly hastened death in some cases where life-shortening was not explicitly intended.