1
|
Price O, Papastavrou Brooks C, Johnston I, McPherson P, Goodman H, Grundy A, Cree L, Motala Z, Robinson J, Doyle M, Stokes N, Armitage CJ, Barley E, Brooks H, Callaghan P, Carter LA, Davies LM, Drake RJ, Lovell K, Bee P. Development and evaluation of a de-escalation training intervention in adult acute and forensic units: the EDITION systematic review and feasibility trial. Health Technol Assess 2024; 28:1-120. [PMID: 38343036 PMCID: PMC11017147 DOI: 10.3310/fggw6874] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/15/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Containment (e.g. physical restraint and seclusion) is used frequently in mental health inpatient settings. Containment is associated with serious psychological and physical harms. De-escalation (psychosocial techniques to manage distress without containment) is recommended to manage aggression and other unsafe behaviours, for example self-harm. All National Health Service staff are trained in de-escalation but there is little to no evidence supporting training's effectiveness. Objectives Objectives were to: (1) qualitatively investigate de-escalation and identify barriers and facilitators to use across the range of adult acute and forensic mental health inpatient settings; (2) co-produce with relevant stakeholders an intervention to enhance de-escalation across these settings; (3) evaluate the intervention's preliminary effect on rates of conflict (e.g. violence, self-harm) and containment (e.g. seclusion and physical restraint) and understand barriers and facilitators to intervention effects. Design Intervention development informed by Experience-based Co-design and uncontrolled pre and post feasibility evaluation. Systematic reviews and qualitative interviews investigated contextual variation in use and effects of de-escalation. Synthesis of this evidence informed co-design of an intervention to enhance de-escalation. An uncontrolled feasibility trial of the intervention followed. Clinical outcome data were collected over 24 weeks including an 8-week pre-intervention phase, an 8-week embedding and an 8-week post-intervention phase. Setting Ten inpatient wards (including acute, psychiatric intensive care, low, medium and high secure forensic) in two United Kingdom mental health trusts. Participants In-patients, clinical staff, managers, carers/relatives and training staff in the target settings. Interventions Enhancing de-escalation techniques in adult acute and forensic units: Development and evaluation of an evidence-based training intervention (EDITION) interventions included de-escalation training, two novel models of reflective practice, post-incident debriefing and feedback on clinical practice, collaborative prescribing and ward rounds, practice changes around admission, shift handovers and the social and physical environment, and sensory modulation and support planning to reduce patient distress. Main outcome measures Outcomes measured related to feasibility (recruitment and retention, completion of outcome measures), training outcomes and clinical and safety outcomes. Conflict and containment rates were measured via the Patient-Staff Conflict Checklist. Clinical outcomes were measured using the Attitudes to Containment Measures Questionnaire, Attitudes to Personality Disorder Questionnaire, Violence Prevention Climate Scale, Capabilities, Opportunities, and Motivation Scale, Coercion Experience Scale and Perceived Expressed Emotion in Staff Scale. Results Completion rates of the proposed primary outcome were very good at 68% overall (excluding remote data collection), which increased to 76% (excluding remote data collection) in the post-intervention period. Secondary outcomes had high completion rates for both staff and patient respondents. Regression analyses indicated that reductions in conflict and containment were both predicted by study phase (pre, embedding, post intervention). There were no adverse events or serious adverse events related to the intervention. Conclusions Intervention and data-collection procedures were feasible, and there was a signal of an effect on the proposed primary outcome. Limitations Uncontrolled design and self-selecting sample. Future work Definitive trial determining intervention effects. Trial registration This trial is registered as ISRCTN12826685 (closed to recruitment). Funding This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: 16/101/02) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 28, No. 3. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information. Context Conflict (a term used to describe a range of potentially unsafe events including violence, self-harm, rule-breaking, medication refusal, illicit drug and alcohol use and absconding) in mental health settings causes serious physical and psychological harm. Containment interventions which are intended to minimise harm from violence (and other conflict behaviours) such as restraint, seclusion and rapid tranquilisation can result in serious injuries to patients and, occasionally, death. Involvement in physical restraint is the most common cause of serious physical injury to National Health Service mental health staff in the United Kingdom. Violence to staff results in substantial costs to the health service in sickness and litigation payments. Containment interventions are also expensive (e.g. physical restraint costs mental health services £6.1 million and enhanced observations £88 million per annum). Despite these harms, recent findings indicate containment interventions such as seclusion and physical restraint continue to be used frequently in mental health settings. Clinical trials have demonstrated that interventions can reduce containment without increasing violence and other conflict behaviours (e.g. verbal aggression, self-harm). Substantial cost-savings result from reducing containment use. De-escalation, as an intervention to manage aggression and potential violence without restrictive practices, is a core intervention. 'De-escalation' is a collective term for a range of psychosocial techniques designed to reduce distress and anger without the need to use 'containment' interventions (measures to prevent harm through restricting a person's ability to act independently, such as physical restraint and seclusion). Evidence indicates that de-escalation involves ensuring conditions for safe intervention and effective communication are established, clarifying and attempting to resolve the patient's concern, conveyance of respect and empathy and regulating unhelpful emotions such as anxiety and anger. Despite featuring prominently in clinical guidelines and training policy domestically and internationally and being a component of mandatory National Health Service training, there is no evidence-based model on which to base training. A systematic review of de-escalation training effectiveness and acceptability conducted in 2015 concluded: (1) no model of training has demonstrated effectiveness in a sufficiently rigorous evaluation, (2) the theoretical underpinning of evaluated models was often unclear and (3) there has been inadequate investigation of the characteristics of training likely to enhance acceptability and uptake. Despite all National Health Service staff being trained in de-escalation there have been no high-quality trials evaluating the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of training. Feasibility studies are needed to establish whether it is possible to conduct a definitive trial that can determine the clinical, safety and cost-effectiveness of this intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Owen Price
- Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Isobel Johnston
- Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Peter McPherson
- Division of Psychiatry, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - Helena Goodman
- School of Health Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| | - Andrew Grundy
- Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Lindsey Cree
- Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Zahra Motala
- Atherleigh Park Hospital, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Jade Robinson
- School of Health Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| | - Michael Doyle
- School of Human and Health Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, UK
| | - Nicholas Stokes
- West London Forensic Service, St Bernard's Hospital, West London Mental Health NHS Trust, Southall, UK
| | - Christopher J Armitage
- Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Helen Brooks
- Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Patrick Callaghan
- School of Applied Sciences, London South Bank University, London, UK
| | | | - Linda M Davies
- Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, Work, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Richard J Drake
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Karina Lovell
- Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Penny Bee
- Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tölli S, Kontio R, Partanen P, Häggman-Laitila A. Conceptual framework for a comprehensive competence in managing challenging behaviour: The views of trained instructors. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 2021; 28:692-705. [PMID: 33295055 DOI: 10.1111/jpm.12722] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2020] [Revised: 10/10/2020] [Accepted: 11/30/2020] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
WHAT IS KNOWN ON THE SUBJECT?: There is body of knowledge available about the harms associated with restrictive interventions used in behaviour management, service users' perceptions of the use of restraints, and staff competence in behaviour management. The staff perspective has been studied in terms of staff exposure, responses to and prevention of aggression, staff-related factors associated with service user aggression, and staff attitudes and perceptions towards violence. The definitions of competence in behaviour management provided in training interventions are fragmented and based on unilateral measurements. Training interventions with the purpose of enhancing staff competence in behaviour management are organized regularly, yet there is a lack of clarity on how effective these interventions are. Inadequate conceptual understanding of behaviour management can weaken the effectiveness of these interventions. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS TO EXISTING KNOWLEDGE?: Our study produced new knowledge by providing a preliminary conceptual framework that can be used to comprehensively describe and assess competence in managing challenging behaviour and to cover safely the whole care process. Humane care and ethical sensitivity should be the premises of interaction with people in distress. We also pointed out the needs for conceptual clarification of the concepts of confidence, support and restraint. We provide important new insight into the leadership and cultural issues of behaviour management that is relevant for patients, staff members and healthcare organizations. We found that staff members do not consider service user safety and workplace safety as opposing issues. Further, we provide new perspectives for prevention, the risk assessment process and effective communication in the context of behaviour management. WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE?: A comprehensive understanding of the competences related to behaviour management will foster universal definitions for "support" and "restraint," which can then be used to ensure that the best practices are used for behaviour management. Organizational culture and participative leadership on behaviour management should be developed with a special focus on safety issues, common understanding of comprehensive competence, risk assessment and prevention, views regarding the use of restraints, and teamwork. ABSTRACT: Introduction Previous research concerning staff views of behaviour management has not considered instructors' views. The definitions of competence in behaviour management are fragmented, which can undermine the effectiveness of training interventions. Aim/Question This study aimed to describe Finnish and British Management of Actual or Potential Aggression instructors' perceptions of safety and behaviour management-related competences and create a conceptual framework for comprehensive competence. Method An explorative-descriptive qualitative approach with purposive sampling (N = 22), semi-structured interviews and abductive content analysis. Results Conceptual framework of comprehensive competence in managing challenging behaviour includes five categories-knowledge, skills, attitude, confidence and ethical sensitivity-and 21 subcategories. Competent staff and supportive leadership ensured safety, while inconsistent risk management culture, the health and behaviour of service users, and inadequate staff orientation endangered safety. Discussion The study produced new knowledge of safety issues and competences from the perspective of the instructors who deliver behaviour management training. Implications for practice Competence to manage challenging behaviour should be developed based on our conceptual framework to provide an effective and safe training. Prevention, the risk assessment process, alternative communication, and the definitions of "confidence," "support" and "restraint" should all be sufficiently addressed in future training.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sirpa Tölli
- University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.,Oulu University of Applied Sciences, Oulu, Finland
| | - Raija Kontio
- Director Hyvinkää Hospital, Adjunct Professor Helsinki University, Helsinki, Finland
| | | | - Arja Häggman-Laitila
- University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.,Social and Health Care, City of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Berndtsson I, Dahlborg E, Pennbrant S. Work-integrated learning as a pedagogical tool to integrate theory and practice in nursing education - An integrative literature review. Nurse Educ Pract 2019; 42:102685. [PMID: 31841809 DOI: 10.1016/j.nepr.2019.102685] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2018] [Revised: 03/12/2019] [Accepted: 12/05/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
It can be challenging for nursing students to navigate between theory and practice and to implement theoretical knowledge in real work situations and vice-versa. Work-integrated learning can support the students by enabling them to combine theoretical studies with practical work experience during their clinical placement. The aim of this integrative literature review was to identify models for the integration of theory and practice during clinical placements in nursing education by using work-integrated learning. Sixteen articles were found and analyzed using an integrative review method. Three themes were identified: 1) Supervisor support to enable students to develop a professional identity 2) Variety of modalities for teaching and 3) Collaboration between academic lecturers and clinical supervisors aimed at integrating theoretical and practical knowledge. Work-integrated learning enables students to integrate theory and practice, develop skills for knowledge-in-practice and prepares them for working life. It also supports the sharing of experiences between various healthcare professionals. This review identified a need for further research on work-integrated learning as a method for enhancing nursing students' workplace learning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ina Berndtsson
- University West, Department of Health Sciences, Gustava Melins Gata 2, 461 86, Trollhättan, Sweden.
| | - Elisabeth Dahlborg
- University West, Department of Health Sciences, Gustava Melins Gata 2, 461 86, Trollhättan, Sweden.
| | - Sandra Pennbrant
- University West, Department of Health Sciences, Gustava Melins Gata 2, 461 86, Trollhättan, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tölli S, Partanen P, Kontio R, Häggman-Laitila A. A quantitative systematic review of the effects of training interventions on enhancing the competence of nursing staff in managing challenging patient behaviour. J Adv Nurs 2017; 73:2817-2831. [PMID: 28556934 DOI: 10.1111/jan.13351] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/03/2017] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
AIMS This systematic quantitative review identifies and summarizes the current knowledge and effects of training interventions for managing patients' challenging behaviour. BACKGROUND Challenging behaviour is an acknowledged worldwide healthcare problem and its management can have a huge impact on quality of care. Evidence-based training interventions that focus on managing challenging behaviour are needed, but few tools for the systematic evaluation of these interventions are currently offered. DESIGN A quantitative systematic review following the 2008 Centre for Reviews and Dissemination guidelines. DATA SOURCES CINAHL, Scopus, PsycInfo, PubMed and Cochrane were searched using the same terms for papers published in English from 2005-2015. REVIEW METHODS Studies were assessed for quality and risk of bias, according to the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group criteria. A narrative summary was conducted. RESULTS We included 17 studies and evaluated 16 training interventions. Interventions were classified into four key themes: disengagements, communication, controlling behavioural symptoms and restrictive measures. Our review showed that interventions were more likely to decrease violent incident rates and increase staff confidence than change staff attitudes or increase knowledge. The elements of competence used to manage challenging behaviour were measured unilaterally. The evidence provided by studies was largely weak. CONCLUSION The variety of measurements used in the studies made comparing the effectiveness of the training interventions difficult. An individual's competence to manage challenging behaviour needs to be defined and a comprehensive scale for evaluating competence is also needed. Patient safety should be included in future evaluations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sirpa Tölli
- Oulu University of Applied Sciences, Finland.,University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | | | - Raija Kontio
- Lohja Hospital Area, Hospital District of Helsinki and Uusimaa and University of Helsinki, Finland
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Guay S, Goncalves J, Boyer R. Evaluation of an Education and Training Program to Prevent and Manage Patients' Violence in a Mental Health Setting: A Pretest-Posttest Intervention Study. Healthcare (Basel) 2016; 4:E49. [PMID: 27490582 PMCID: PMC5041050 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare4030049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2016] [Revised: 07/05/2016] [Accepted: 07/25/2016] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Workplace violence can lead to serious consequences for victims, organizations, and society. Most workplace violence prevention programs aim to train staff to better recognize and safely manage at-risk situations. The Omega education and training program was developed in Canada in 1999, and has since been used to teach healthcare and mental health workers the skills needed to effectively intervene in situations of aggression. The present study was designed to assess the impact of Omega on employee psychological distress, confidence in coping, and perceived exposure to violence. This program was offered to 105 employees in a psychiatric hospital in Montreal, Canada. Eighty-nine of them accepted to participate. Questionnaires were completed before the training, after a short period of time (M = 109 days) and at follow-up (M = 441 days). Repeated-measures ANOVAs and Cohen's d effect sizes were calculated. Results demonstrated statistically significant improvements in short-term and follow-up posttest scores of psychological distress, confidence in coping, and in levels of exposure to violence. This study is one of very few to demonstrate the positive impact of this training program. Further research is needed to understand how to improve the effectiveness of the program, especially among participants resistant to change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stéphane Guay
- Trauma Studies Centre, Centre de Recherche-Institut Universitaire en Santé Mentale de Montréal, 7401 Hochelaga, Montreal, QC H1N 3M5, Canada.
- School of Criminology, University of Montreal, Pavillon Lionel-Groulx, 3150 Jean-Brillant, Montreal, QC H3T 1N8, Canada.
| | - Jane Goncalves
- Trauma Studies Centre, Centre de Recherche-Institut Universitaire en Santé Mentale de Montréal, 7401 Hochelaga, Montreal, QC H1N 3M5, Canada.
| | - Richard Boyer
- Trauma Studies Centre, Centre de Recherche-Institut Universitaire en Santé Mentale de Montréal, 7401 Hochelaga, Montreal, QC H1N 3M5, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Price O, Baker J, Bee P, Lovell K. Learning and performance outcomes of mental health staff training in de-escalation techniques for the management of violence and aggression. Br J Psychiatry 2015; 206:447-55. [PMID: 26034178 DOI: 10.1192/bjp.bp.114.144576] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND De-escalation techniques are a recommended non-physical intervention for the management of violence and aggression in mental health. Although taught as part of mandatory training for all National Health Service (NHS) mental health staff, there remains a lack of clarity around training effectiveness. AIMS To conduct a systematic review of the learning, performance and clinical safety outcomes of de-escalation techniques training. METHOD The review process involved a systematic literature search of 20 electronic databases, eligibility screening of results, data extraction, quality appraisal and data synthesis. RESULTS A total of 38 relevant studies were identified. The strongest impact of training appears to be on de-escalation-related knowledge, confidence to manage aggression and deescalation performance (although limited to artificial training scenarios). No strong conclusions could be drawn about the impact of training on assaults, injuries, containment and organisational outcomes owing to the low quality of evidence and conflicting results. CONCLUSIONS It is assumed that de-escalation techniques training will improve staff's ability to de-escalate violent and aggressive behaviour and improve safety in practice. There is currently limited evidence that this training has these effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Owen Price
- Owen Price, MSc, RMN, NIHR Trainees Coordinating Centre, London; John Baker, PhD, Penny Bee, PhD, Karina Lovell, PhD, The University of Manchester, School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
| | - John Baker
- Owen Price, MSc, RMN, NIHR Trainees Coordinating Centre, London; John Baker, PhD, Penny Bee, PhD, Karina Lovell, PhD, The University of Manchester, School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
| | - Penny Bee
- Owen Price, MSc, RMN, NIHR Trainees Coordinating Centre, London; John Baker, PhD, Penny Bee, PhD, Karina Lovell, PhD, The University of Manchester, School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
| | - Karina Lovell
- Owen Price, MSc, RMN, NIHR Trainees Coordinating Centre, London; John Baker, PhD, Penny Bee, PhD, Karina Lovell, PhD, The University of Manchester, School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
| |
Collapse
|