Pharmacokinetic comparison of oral and local action transcutaneous flurbiprofen in healthy volunteers

Rapid identification of potential nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug overdose-induced liver toxicity and prediction of follow-up exposure: Integrating bioanalytical and population pharmacokinetic assay

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are among the most frequently used drugs that can cause liver toxicity. The aim of this study was to integrate bioanalytical and population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) assay to rapidly screen and quantify the concentrations of NSAIDs in plasma and monitor clinical safety. A liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method was developed for the simultaneous quantification of acetaminophen (APAP), flurbiprofen (FLB), aspirin (ASP), and ibuprofen (IBP), four commonly used NSAIDs. The PopPK model of the signature toxicant was analyzed based on the published literature. The LC-MS/MS method was successfully validated and applied to determine NSAID concentrations in patient plasma samples. APAP, ASP, and IBP data were best fitted using a one-compartment model, and FLB data were best fitted using a two-compartment model. Bootstrapping and visual predictive checks suggested that a robust and reliable pharmacokinetic model was developed. A fast, simple, and sensitive LC-MS/MS method was developed and validated for determining APAP, FLB, ASP, and IBP in human plasma. Combined with the PopPK model, this method was applied to rapidly analyze the concentrations of NSAIDs in clinical samples from patients presenting to the emergency department with acute liver dysfunction and monitored NSAIDs clinical safety.

Multidisciplinary Guidelines for the Rational Use of Topical Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs for Musculoskeletal Pain (2022)

(1) Background: Topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are one of the primary drugs for treating musculoskeletal pain. However, there are currently no evidence-based recommendations about drug selection, drug administration, drug interactions, and use in special populations or other pharmacology-related content of such medications. To this end, the Chinese Pharmaceutical Association Hospital Pharmacy Professional Committee developed multidisciplinary guidelines on using topical NSAIDs to treat musculoskeletal pain. (2) Methods: The guidelines development process followed the World Health Organization guideline development handbook, the GRADE methodology, and the statement of Reporting Items for Practice Guidelines in Healthcare. The guideline panel used the Delphi method to identify six clinical questions to be addressed in the guidelines. An independent systematic review team conducted a systematic search and integration of evidence. (3) Results: Based on the balance between the benefits and harms of an intervention, the quality of the evidence, patient preferences and values, and resource utilization, the guideline panel developed 11 recommendations and nine expert consensuses on using topical NSAIDs to treat acute and chronic musculoskeletal pain. (4) Conclusions: Based on the effectiveness and overall safety of topical NSAIDs, we recommend patients with musculoskeletal pain use topical NSAIDs and suggest high-risk patients use topical NSAIDs, such as those with other diseases or receiving other concurrent treatments. The evidenced-based guidelines on topical NSAIDs for musculoskeletal pain incorporated a pharmacist perspective. The guidelines have the potential to facilitate the rational use of topical NSAIDs. The guideline panel will monitor the relevant evidence and update the recommendations accordingly.

Expert consensus of the Chinese Association for the Study of Pain on pain treatment with the transdermal patch

Chronic pain lasting more than 3 mo, or even several years can lead to disability. Treating chronic pain safely and effectively is a critical challenge faced by clinicians. Because administration of analgesics through oral, intravenous or intramuscular routes is not satisfactory, research toward percutaneous delivery has gained interest. The transdermal patch is one such percutaneous delivery system that can deliver drugs through the skin and capillaries at a certain rate to achieve a systemic or local therapeutic effect in the affected area. It has many advantages including ease of administration and hepatic first pass metabolism avoidance as well as controlling drug delivery, which reduces the dose frequency and side effects. If not required, then the patch can be removed from the skin immediately. The scopolamine patch was the first transdermal patch to be approved for the treatment of motion sickness by the Food and Drug Administration in 1979. From then on, the transdermal patch has been widely used to treat many diseases. To date, no guidelines or consensus are available on the use of analgesic drugs through transdermal delivery. The pain branch of the Chinese Medical Association, after meeting and discussing with experts and based on clinical evidence, developed a consensus for promoting and regulating standard use of transdermal patches containing analgesic drugs.

Effect of Flurbiprofen and S-Flurbiprofen Patches on Multimodal Pain Management After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an established procedure for knee osteoarthritis. Multimodal analgesia is reportedly more effective for postoperative analgesia. We investigated the efficacy of 2 patches after TKA.

METHODS

Seventy-nine knees that underwent unilateral TKA for osteoarthritis were included. Oral administration, local periarticular analgesic injection, and patches were adopted for pain management. The knees were randomly assigned to the flurbiprofen patch (FPP), S-flurbiprofen patch (SFPP), and control (no patch) groups. Patch treatment was continued for 14 days. Pain according to the visual analog scale, knee flexion angle, renal dysfunction, gastrointestinal injury, duration of hospitalization, dermatitis, and the rate of using additional oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were compared (from preoperative to postoperative day 14).

RESULTS

The FPP, SFPP, and control groups included 29, 27, and 23 knees, respectively. Visual analog scale was lower in the FPP and SFPP groups than in the control group on days 1 and 3 (day 1: 24.4, 25.0, and 39.4, respectively; day 3: 25.5, 23.3, and 39.3, respectively). Knee flexion angle was larger in the SFPP group than in the control group on days 7 and 14 (day 7: 89.8° and 76.6°, respectively; day 14: 98.3° and 84.2°, respectively). Neither renal dysfunction nor gastrointestinal injury was confirmed. The duration of hospitalization did not differ among the groups. Dermatitis occurred only in the SFPP group. The rate of using additional oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs was higher in the control group.

CONCLUSION

Both patches were effective and safe as part of multimodal analgesia for postoperative TKA.

Topical Anti-Inflammatory and Analgesic Effects of Multiple Applications of S(+)-Flurbiprofen Plaster (SFPP) in a Rat Adjuvant-Induced Arthritis Model

Preclinical Research

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of multiple applications of S(+)‐flurbiprofen plaster (SFPP), a novel Nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drug (NSAID) patch, for the alleviation of inflammatory pain and edema in rat adjuvant‐induced arthritis (AIA) model as compared to other NSAID patches. The AIA model was induced by the injection of Mycobacterium butyricum and rats were treated with a patch (1.0 cm × 0.88 cm) containing each NSAID (SFP, ketoprofen, loxoprofen, diclofenac, felbinac, flurbiprofen, or indomethacin) applied to the paw for 6 h per day for 5 days. The pain threshold was evaluated using a flexion test of the ankle joint, and the inflamed paw edema was evaluated using a plethysmometer. cyclooxygenase (COX)−1 and COX‐2 inhibition was evaluated using human recombinant proteins. Multiple applications of SFPP exerted a significant analgesic effect from the first day of application as compared to the other NSAID patches. In terms of paw edema, SFPP decreased edema from the second day after application, Multiple applications of SFPP were superior to those of other NSAID patches, in terms of the analgesic effect with multiple applications. These results suggest that SFPP may be a beneficial patch for providing analgesic and anti‐inflammatory effects clinically. Drug Dev Res 77 : 206–211, 2016. © 2016 The Authors Drug Development Research Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Analgesic Effect of the Newly Developed S(+)-Flurbiprofen Plaster on Inflammatory Pain in a Rat Adjuvant-Induced Arthritis Model

Preclinical Research This article describes the properties of a novel topical NSAID (Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug) patch, SFPP (S(+)-flurbiprofen plaster), containing the potent cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibitor, S(+)-flurbiprofen (SFP). The present studies were conducted to confirm human COX inhibition and absorption of SFP and to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of SFPP in a rat adjuvant-induced arthritis (AIA) model. COX inhibition by SFP, ketoprofen and loxoprofen was evaluated using human recombinant COX proteins. Absorption of SFPP, ketoprofen and loxoprofen from patches through rat skin was assessed 24 h after application. The AIA model was induced by injecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis followed 20 days later by the evaluation of the prostaglandin PGE2 content of the inflamed paw and the pain threshold. SFP exhibited more potent inhibitory activity against COX-1 (IC50  = 8.97 nM) and COX-2 (IC50  = 2.94 nM) than the other NSAIDs evaluated. Absorption of SFP was 92.9%, greater than that of ketoprofen and loxoprofen from their respective patches. Application of SFPP decreased PGE2 content from 15 min to 6 h and reduced paw hyperalgesia compared with the control, ketoprofen and loxoprofen patches. SFPP showed analgesic efficacy, and was superior to the ketoprofen and loxoprofen patches, which could be through the potent COX inhibitory activity of SFP and greater skin absorption. The results suggested SFPP can be expected to exert analgesic effect clinically.

Plasma pharmacokinetics and synovial concentrations of S-flurbiprofen plaster in humans

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to investigate the pharmacokinetics and deep tissue penetration capability of the newly developed S-flurbiprofen plaster (SFPP) in humans.

METHODS

Study 1: SFPP tape-type patch (2-60 mg) was applied to the lower back for 24 h in healthy adult volunteers. S-flurbiprofen (SFP) plasma concentration was measured over time to examine SFP pharmacokinetics. Study 2: SFPP (20 mg) was applied for 12 h to the affected knee of osteoarthritis (OA) patients who were scheduled for total knee arthroplasty. Deep tissues (synovial tissue and synovial fluid) were collected during surgery to compare SFP concentrations after application of SFPP or a commercially available flurbiprofen (FP) gel-type patch.

RESULTS

Study 1: The plasma concentration of SFP was sustained during 24-h topical application of the SFPP, showing a high percutaneous absorption ratio of 51.4-72.2 %. Cmax and AUC0-∞ were dose-proportional. Study 2: After application of the SFPP for 12 h, SFP concentrations in the synovial tissue and synovial fluid were 14.8-fold (p = 0.002) and 32.7-fold (p < 0.001) higher, respectively, than those achieved by the FP patch.

CONCLUSIONS

Sustained plasma concentration of SFP and high percutaneous absorption ratio was observed after 24-h topical application of the SFPP. Compared to the FP patch, the SFPP showed superior percutaneous absorption and greater tissue penetration of SFP into the synovial tissue. Greater tissue penetration of the SFPP seemed to be primarily due to its formulation. Thus, SFPP is expected to show higher efficacy for the treatment of knee OA.

Preliminary study on carprofen concentration measurements after transcutaneous treatment with Vetdrop® in a microfracture joint defect model in sheep

BACKGROUND

The present preliminary study describes concentration time courses of the NSAID carprofen in the plasma and synovial fluid in a microfrature sheep model after transcutaneous treatments with a novel application device (Vetdrop®). To treat circumscribed inflammatory processes a transcutaneous application device could potentially be beneficial. After transcutaneous application normally lower systemic concentrations are measured which may reduce the incidence of side effects, whereas efficacy is still maintained. In this study carprofen was used based on its capacity to provide analgesia after orthopaedic procedures in sheep and it is considered that it may have a positive influence on the healing of cartilage in low concentrations.

RESULTS

In all transcutaneously treated animals, carprofen plasma concentrations exceeded those of synovial fluid, although plasma levels remained significantly reduced (300-fold) as compared to carprofen administered intravenously. Furthermore, in contrast to the intravenously treated animals, a modest accumulation of carprofen in plasma and synovial fluid was observed in the transcutaneously treated animals over the 6-week treatment period.

CONCLUSIONS

The transcutaneously administered carprofen using the Vetdrop® device penetrated the skin and both, plasma- and synovial concentrations could be measured repeatedly over time. This novel device may be considered a valuable transcutaneous drug delivery system.

Topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for the treatment of pain due to soft tissue injury: diclofenac epolamine topical patch

The objective of this article is to review published clinical data on diclofenac epolamine topical patch 1.3% (DETP) in the treatment of acute soft tissue injuries, such as strains, sprains, and contusions. Review of published literature on topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), diclofenac, and DETP in patients with acute soft tissue injuries was included. Relevant literature was identified on MEDLINE using the search terms topical NSAIDs, diclofenac, diclofenac epolamine, acute pain, sports injury, soft tissue injury, strain, sprain, and contusion, and from citations in retrieved articles covering the years 1978-2008. Review of published, randomized clinical trials and meta-analyses shows that topical NSAIDs are significantly more effective than placebo in relieving acute pain; the pooled average relative benefit was 1.7 (95% confidence interval, 1.5-1.9). In a limited number of comparisons, topical and oral NSAIDs provided comparable pain relief, but the use of topical agents produced lower plasma drug concentrations and fewer systemic adverse events (AEs). The physical-chemical properties of diclofenac epolamine make it well suited for topical use. In patients with acute soft tissue injuries treated with DETP, clinical data report an analgesic benefit within hours of the first application, and significant pain relief relative to placebo within 3 days. Moreover, DETP displayed tolerability comparable with placebo; the most common AEs were pruritus and other application site reactions. Review of published literature suggests that DETP is generally safe and well tolerated, clinically efficacious, and a rational treatment option for patients experiencing acute pain associated with strains, sprains, and contusions, and other localized painful conditions.

Evaluation of percutaneous permeation of flurbiprofen and ketoprofen after application of transdermal patches using a lateral sectioning approach in hairless rats

OBJECTIVES

The dispositions and pharmacokinetic parameters of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) after patch applications have typically been evaluated on a whole-skin basis, and the detailed permeation profiles remain unclear. The aim of this study was to establish a new method for clearly analyzing the flow of drugs in the skin layers and evaluating the drug levels in the target area of the skin tissue.

METHODS

The skin tissue areas where flurbiprofen and ketoprofen patches were applied were cut into 20 μm-thick lateral slices from the surface to the deepest layer and the drug concentrations in the slices were measured.

RESULTS

The results revealed the presence of depth-dependent concentration gradients from the surface to the deep layer and that the drug concentration in the deepest layer was less than one tenth of the surface concentration for both flurbiprofen and ketoprofen. In addition, flurbiprofen yielded higher and more rapid concentrations in the deepest skin layer adjacent to the intramuscular tissue.

CONCLUSIONS

The present data suggest that our technique involving lateral slicing of skin tissues and measurement of drug concentrations allows visual understanding of drug dispositions in the skin layers and makes it possible to evaluate the drug levels in the target area of the skin tissue.

Comparative bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of investigational enteric- and film-coated formulations of flurbiprofen 100-mg tablets: a single-dose, randomized, open-label, two-period, two-way crossover study in healthy Pakistani male volunteers

BACKGROUND

Flurbiprofen, a chiral, 2-arylpropionic acid NSAID with analgesic and antipyretic properties, has been associated with important gastrointestinal adverse events, including peptic ulcer and gastrointestinal perforation. An investigational enteric-coated tablet formulation of flurbiprofen was produced to evaluate whether it would improve the gastric tolerability of flurbiprofen.

OBJECTIVE

This study compared the pharmacokinetic parameters and bioavailability of flurbiprofen from the investigational enteric-coated tablet (test) and from a film-coated immediate-release tablet compounded for the purposes of this study (reference).

METHODS

This was a randomized, open-label, 2-period, 2-way crossover study conducted in healthy male volunteers at a single center in Pakistan. Small batches of the test and reference tablets were manufactured and evaluated according to US Pharmacopoeia criteria. Each volunteer received a single 100-mg tablet of the test and reference formulations, separated by a 14-day washout period. Tablets were administered after an overnight fast. Blood samples were obtained before dosing (0) and at 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12, and 24 hours after drug administration. Safety monitoring was performed by an unblinded physician and included adverse events, biochemistry and hematology tests, urinalysis, and ECGs. Plasma concentrations of the 2 formulations were determined, and pharmacokinetic parameters were compared using noncompartmental analysis. The 2 formulations were considered bioequivalent if the 90% CI for the ratios (test:reference) of log-transformed C(max), AUC(0-t), and AUC(0-infinity) were between 0.80 and 1.25.

RESULTS

Of the 23 healthy male subjects originally recruited, 2 withdrew before commencement of the study. Twenty-one subjects (mean [SD] age, 25.4 [2.7] years [range, 20-30 years]; weight, 63.4 [7.2] kg [range, 56-78 kg]) were enrolled in and completed the study. There were significant differences in C(max), AUC(0-t), and AUC(0-infinity) between the test and reference formulations (all, P < 0.001). The 90% CIs for the geometric mean ratios of log-transformed C(max), AUC(0-t), and AUC(0-infinity) (49.78-55.22, 57.51-64.42, and 58.48-65.30, respectively) were not within the predetermined bioequivalence range. There were no clinically meaningful changes in hematology, biochemistry, urinalysis, or physical variables with either formulation over the course of the study. Mild headache was reported in 2 volunteers who received the reference formulation during the first study period; this was not considered related to study drug.

CONCLUSIONS

In this small study in healthy Pakistani male subjects, there were significant differences in the bioavailability and pharmacokinetic parameters of the enteric- and film-coated tablet formulations of flurbiprofen. Thus, the 2 formulations could not be considered bioequivalent. Both formulations were well tolerated.

Pharmacokinetic and bioequivalence comparison between orally disintegrating and conventional tablet formulations of flurbiprofen: a single-dose, randomized-sequence, open-label, two-period crossover study in healthy Chinese male volunteers

BACKGROUND

Flurbiprofen, an NSAID, is used for the treatment of inflammation and pain caused by rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis as well as soft-tissue injuries. A new orally disintegrating tablet (ODT) of flurbiprofen has recently been developed; this study was conducted to provide support for this drug to obtain marketing authorization in China.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to compare the pharmacokinetic properties and bioequivalence of flurbiprofen 50-mg ODT (test) with a conventional flurbiprofen 50-mg tablet (reference) under fasting conditions in healthy volunteers.

METHODS

This was a single-dose, randomized-sequence, open-label, 2-period crossover study. Healthy, nonsmoking Chinese male volunteers were randomly assigned to receive 150 mg (administered as three 50-mg tablets) of either the test or reference formulation of flurbiprofen, followed by a 7-day washout period and administration of the alternate formulation. Study drugs were administered after a 12-hour overnight fast. Blood samples were collected before dosing and at 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 hours after dosing. Serum flurbiprofen concentrations were analyzed using a validated nonstereospecific liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry method. Pharmacokinetic parameters, including C(max), T(max), t(1/2), AUC(0-24), and AUC(0-infinity), were calculated and analyzed statistically. C(max), AUC(0-24), and AUC(0-infinity) were used to test for bioequivalence after natural logarithm (ln)-transformation. Tolerability was evaluated throughout the study by clinical assessments, vital sign monitoring, physical examinations, 12-lead ECG, clinical laboratory tests, and questioning subjects about adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

A total of 20 Chinese males (mean [SD] age, 21.4 [2.5] years [range, 19-28 years]; height, 174.4 [4.2] cm [range, 169-183 cm]; weight, 63.2 [5.1] kg [range, 56-78 kg]; body mass index, 20.8 [1.4] kg/m(2) [range, 19-24 kg/m(2)]) completed the study. No period or sequence effect was observed. The 90% CIs for the ln-transformed ratios of Cmax, AUC(0-24), and AUC(0-infinity) were 99.9% to 115.9%, 97.8% to 107.9%, and 100.3% to 110.9%, respectively, meeting the predetermined criteria for bioequivalence. Two subjects (10.0%) experienced 1 of 2 mild AEs (increase in total bilirubin and dizziness), which were not considered to be associated with study drug administration.

CONCLUSIONS

This single-dose 150-mg (three 50-mg tablets) study of each formulation of flurbiprofen found that the test and reference products met the regulatory criteria for bioequivalence in these fasting healthy Chinese male volunteers. Both formulations were generally well tolerated. State Food and Drug Administration of China study registration number: 2005L04356.

The Binary Eutectic of NSAIDs and Two-Phase Liquid System for Enhanced Membrane Permeation

The eutectic properties of binary mixtures of some nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) with ibuprofen were studied using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and phase equilibrium diagrams. The melting points of selected NSAIDs were significantly depressed due to binary eutectic formation with ibuprofen. Ketoprofen and ibuprofen were selected to study the effect of eutectic formation on membrane permeation using Franz diffusion cells and snake skin as the model membrane. The presence of aqueous isopropyl alcohol (IPA) was necessary to completely transform the solid drugs into an oily state at ambient temperature. As much as the 99.6% of ibuprofen and the 88.8% of ketoprofen added were found in the oily phase of the two-phase liquid system formed when aqueous IPA was added to the eutectic mixture. Due to the high drug concentration in the oily phase, and maximum thermodynamic activity, the two-phase liquid system showed enhanced membrane permeation rates of ibuprofen (37.5 microg/cm2/hr) and ketoprofen (33.4 microg/cm2/hr) compared to other reference preparations used.

A novel pathway involving melanoma differentiation associated gene-7/interleukin-24 mediates nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced apoptosis and growth arrest of cancer cells

Numerous studies show that nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are effective in chemoprevention or treatment of cancer. Nevertheless, the mechanisms underlying these antineoplastic effects remain poorly understood. Here, we report that induction of the cancer-specific proapoptotic cytokine melanoma differentiation associated gene-7/interleukin-24 (MDA-7/IL-24) by several NSAIDs is an essential step for induction of apoptosis and G(2)-M growth arrest in cancer cells in vitro and inhibition of tumor growth in vivo. We also show that MDA-7/IL-24-dependent up-regulation of growth arrest and DNA damage inducible 45 alpha (GADD45alpha) and GADD45gamma gene expression is sufficient for cancer cell apoptosis via c-Jun NH(2)-terminal kinase (JNK) activation and growth arrest induction through inhibition of Cdc2-cyclin B checkpoint kinase. Knockdown of GADD45alpha and GADD45gamma transcription by small interfering RNA abrogates apoptosis and growth arrest induction by the NSAID treatment, blocks JNK activation, and restores Cdc2-cyclin B kinase activity. Our results establish MDA-7/IL-24 and GADD45alpha and GADD45gamma as critical mediators of apoptosis and growth arrest in response to NSAIDs in cancer cells.

Study of the percutaneous penetration of flurbiprofen by cutaneous and subcutaneous microdialysis after iontophoretic delivery in rat

The percutaneous penetration of flurbiprofen delivered by iontophoresis was investigated in the hairless rat. Unbound concentrations of flurbiprofen in dermis and subcutaneous tissue were continuously measured by on-line microdialysis. Simultaneously, a conventional blood sampling was performed. Linear microdialysis probes were implanted in dermis and in subcutaneous tissue at a depth of 398.3 +/- 15.3 and 1878 +/- 35.8 microm, respectively. Commercial patches were used to deliver flurbiprofen for 15 min at a current density of 0.4 mA/cm(2). In vivo recoveries of both probes, determined by using naproxen as retrodialysis calibrator, were 26.0 +/- 0.3 and 72.9 +/- 0.7% for dermal and subcutaneous probe, respectively. After iontophoretic delivery, a gradient in mean tissue unbound concentrations was observed, with a C(max) in dermis of 8.7 +/- 0.4 microg/mL as compared with subcutaneous C(max) of 0.5 +/- 0.1 microg/mL. The area under the unbound concentration curve in dermis was 13-fold higher than that in the subcutaneous tissue. Total plasma concentration curves showed a rapid absorption phase with a T(max) of 30 min and C(max) of 1.8 +/- 0.1 microg/mL. In conclusion, iontophoresis delivery was demonstrated to be efficient to deliver a high amount of flurbiprofen in dermis and underlying tissue with a fast input rate whereas maintaining a low plasma exposure.

A simplified analytical method for a phenotyping cocktail of major CYP450 biotransformation routes

An efficient, fast and reliable analytical method was developed for the simultaneous evaluation of the activities of five major human drug metabolising cytochrome P450 (1A2, 2C9, 2C19, 2D6 and 3A4) with a cocktail approach including five probe substances, namely caffeine, flurbiprofen, omeprazole, dextromethorphan and midazolam. All substances were administered simultaneously and a single plasma sample was obtained 2h after the administration. Plasma samples were handled by liquid-liquid extraction and analysed by gradient high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) coupled to UV and fluorescence detectors. The chromatographic separation was achieved using a Discovery semi-micro HS C18 HPLC column (5 microm particle size, 150 mm x 2.1 mm i.d.) protected by a guard column (5 microm particle size, 20 mm x 2.1 mm i.d.) The mobile phase was constituted of a methanol, acetonitrile and 20mM ammonium acetate (pH 4.5) with 0.1% triethylamine mixture and was delivered at a flow rate of 0.3 mL min(-1). All substances were separated simultaneously in a single run lasting less than 22 min. The HPLC method was formally validated and showed good performances in terms of linearity, sensitivity, precision and accuracy. Finally, the method was found suitable for the screening of these compounds in plasma samples.

Analgesic profile of peroral and topical ketoprofen upon low pH-induced muscle pain

Topical analgesics are widely marketed for treatment of muscle and joint pain. We have recently developed a model of muscle pain and have used this model to evaluate the efficacy of commercially available topical and peroral ketoprofen in order to evaluate the time- and dose-dependence of analgesia. In the present study, we examined the dose- (0, 50, and 100 mg) and time-dependence (hourly to 8 h) of commercially available peroral and topical ketoprofen. In order to achieve infusion times of 8 h (and thus study the time course of analgesic action), we adapted the model of low pH-induced muscle pain in humans to these requirements by applying the infusions continuously for 10 min every hour for 8 h. We found that the 10 min infusion produced reliable and consistent pain levels that were reproducible over the 8 h of the study. The study was performed double-blind, randomized, and with a 1-week interval between each of five different sessions (cross-over). Altogether six volunteers underwent intramuscular infusions of isotonic phosphate-buffered saline solution of pH 5.2; during each 8 h session the infusion was switched on eight times with a duration of 10 min at 50 min intervals (there was no infusion during the 50 min interval). The intramuscular infusion of low pH phosphate buffer induced a localized dull-aching or stinging muscle pain sensation; the flow rate of the pH infusion was individually adjusted to induce pain of a magnitude of 20% on a visual analogue scale (ranging from "no pain" (0%) to "unbearable pain" (100%)). Twenty minutes after starting the infusion the volunteers received a capsule with either a placebo or 50 or 100 mg ketoprofen perorally and, in addition, either placebo gel or 50 or 100 mg of a 2.5% commercial ketoprofen gel was applied topically to the skin. One of the sessions included a placebo gel and an oral placebo. The intensity of the recurrent pain stimulus was significantly reduced by 59% following administration of 100 mg peroral ketoprofen within the first 3 h (P<0.03, Wilcoxon test); this analgesia lasted up to the sixth hour of the experimental protocol. Oral ketoprofen (50 mg) was less effective and reduced the pain intensity by 45% (P<0.05) from only the second to the third hour. In contrast, pain reduction after topical ketoprofen application was not of the same magnitude but appeared to be faster to develop (with a maximum effect within 1 h) on average. The maximum pain suppression with 100 mg topical 2.5% ketoprofen gel was by 51% (significant with P<0.03), while 50 mg topical ketoprofen produced a non-significant reduction of 29%. The apparent analgesia was rapid to develop but transient and pain ratings increased back to baseline values within 3 h for the 100 mg dose and within 2 h for the 50 mg dose. This data suggests that topical application of commercial gel-based systems does not provide long-lasting analgesia in the muscle when compared to perorally-dosed ketoprofen. In addition, the data show that even doses of 100 mg peroral ketoprofen do not provide complete relief of muscle pain.

Oral versus topical NSAIDs in rheumatic diseases: a comparison

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are among the most commonly prescribed drugs worldwide and are responsible for approximately one-quarter of all adverse drug reaction reports. NSAIDs are widely prescribed for patients with rheumatic disease--a population at increased risk for serious gastrointestinal (GI) complications. Topical administration of NSAIDs offers the advantage of local, enhanced drug delivery to affected tissues with a reduced incidence of systemic adverse effects, such as peptic ulcer disease and GI haemorrhage. NSAIDs administered topically penetrate slowly and in small quantities into the systemic circulation; bioavailability and maximal plasma NSAID concentration after topical application are generally less than 5 and 15%, respectively, compared with equivalent oral administration. Product formulation may have a dramatic impact, not only on absorption rates but also on penetration depth. Compared with oral administration, topical application leads to relatively high NSAID concentrations in the dermis. Concentrations achieved in the muscle tissue below the site of application are variable, but are at least equivalent to that obtained with oral administration. NSAIDs applied topically do reach the synovial fluid, but the extent and mechanism (topical penetration versus distribution via the systemic circulation) remain to be determined. In addition, marked interindividual variability was noted in all studies; percutaneous absorption may be strongly influenced by individual skin properties. In general, interpretation of clinical studies measuring efficacy of topical NSAIDs in rheumatic disease states is difficult because of a remarkably high placebo response rate, use of rescue paracetamol (acetaminophen), and significant variability in percutaneous absorption and response rates between patients. Overall efficacy rates attributable to topical NSAIDs in patients with rheumatic disorders ranged from 18 to 92% of treated patients. Topically applied NSAIDs have a superior safety profile to oral formulations. Adverse effects secondary to topical NSAID application occur in approximately 10 to 15% of patients and are primarily cutaneous in nature (rash and pruritus at site of application). GI adverse drug reactions are rare with topically applied NSAIDs, compared with a 15% incidence reported for oral NSAIDs. Available clinical studies suggest, but do not document, equivalent efficacy of topical over oral NSAIDs in rheumatic diseases.

Topical NSAIDs for musculoskeletal conditions. A review of the literature

In recent years a growing number of topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have become available. This has been prompted in large part by the high incidence of serious gastrointestinal adverse events associated with the use of systemic NSAIDs, and the premise that minimisation of plasma concentrations of active drug may result in fewer systemic adverse effects. Evidence in humans and animals with topical NSAIDs demonstrates lower plasma concentrations than with systemically administered drugs, while those in soft tissues are still of a magnitude considered consistent with exerting an anti-inflammatory effect. In joints, however, the evidence is less strong, and there is still dispute whether in this case the drug reaches the joint predominantly via the transcutaneous or systemic route. There has been a sufficient number of studies of soft tissue conditions to demonstrate the superiority of topical NSAIDs over placebo and to suggest equivalent efficacy in comparison with some oral NSAIDs. For arthropathies, however, the literature is more sparse. Although several studies claim a benefit for topical NSAIDs against placebo, the results are less conclusive and further study is required. Trials of topical agents against intra-articular corticosteroids and rubefacients are either lacking or inconclusive. The adverse event profile of topical agents is reasonable: minor cutaneous effects occur in up to 2% of patients but tend to be self-limiting. Gastrointestinal events appear from the existing literature to be infrequent and minor, although long term studies are required. Bronchospasm and renal impairment have been reported and may be more frequent in patients who have experienced these effects with oral agents. The initial costs of topical agents tend to be higher than those of oral agents but a cost-effectiveness analysis suggests an overall benefit: this issue requires further clarification.

Tissue extraction and high-performance liquid chromatographic determination of ketoprofen entantiomers

Local transcutaneous delivery of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs avoids gastrointestinal side effects and concentrates drugs in the intended tissues. An extraction and HPLC method was developed for ketoprofen in skin, fascia and muscle. Tissue samples were homogenized in NaHCO3. After methylene chloride removal of lipids, the aqueous layer was acidified with HCl and back extracted into isooctane/isopropanol. Ketoprofen was derivatized with ethylchloroformate/S-(-)-alpha-phenylethylamine in triethylamine, then detected by HPLC. Ketoprofen recovery was linear (1-33 microg/g) and was detected in these tissues following in vivo cathodic iontophoresis (160 mA*min). This represents the first non-radioactive method for determination of ketoprofen in tissues following transcutaneous iontophoresis.

Efficacy and tolerability of a topical NSAID patch (local action transcutaneous flurbiprofen) and oral diclofenac in the treatment of soft-tissue rheumatism

The efficacy and safety of local action transcutaneous flurbiprofen 40 mg [flurbiprofen LAT] patches and diclofenac sodium tablets, 50 mg b.d., were compared in an open, multicentre, randomized, parallel-group study in patients with soft-tissue rheumatism. Patches were replaced at 12-hourly intervals. Clinical assessments were performed after 7 and 14 days of treatment. Fifty-six patients were treated with flurbiprofen LAT and 53 with diclofenac. Six withdrawals (three from each group) occurred during the treatment period. A statistically significant difference was observed in favour of flurbiprofen LAT for the principal measure, namely the investigator's opinion of overall change in clinical condition: 49/53 (92%) patients treated with flurbiprofen LAT had improved by day 14 compared with 36/49 (73%) patients receiving diclofenac sodium (p = 0.03; eligible dataset). There were also statistically significant differences in favour of flurbiprofen LAT for the investigator's assessments of the overall severity of the clinical condition (p = 0.03; eligible dataset), for the severity of pain at the region treated (p = 0.04; intent-to-treat), and for the severity of tenderness (p < 0.001; intent-to-treat). Supplementary analgesia (paracetamol) was required by two patients in the flurbiprofen LAT group and by eight diclofenac-treated patients. The difference in favour of flurbiprofen LAT in the average daily consumption of paracetamol was significant (p = 0.04). The patients' assessment of severity of pain on movement also favoured flurbiprofen LAT (p = 0.049; eligible dataset), but there were no statistically significant differences in day or night pain or quality of sleep. For the patients' opinion of treatment there was, however, a statistically significant difference in favour of flurbiprofen LAT (p = 0.02). Of the patients receiving flurbiprofen LAT, 94% regarded it as a convenient form of treatment. With respect to tolerability 8/56 (14%) patients applying flurbiprofen patches reported a total of nine adverse effects (AEs) (mainly local, mild skin irritations), vs 9/52 (17%) patients receiving diclofenac, who reported 12 AEs. Most AEs in the enteric-coated diclofenac group were of a gastrointestinal nature (one of which was severe). In terms of the proportion of patients reporting AEs related to the digestive system, there was a statistically significant difference in favour of flurbiprofen LAT (p = 0.011). In conclusion, local treatment of soft-tissue rheumatism with flurbiprofen LAT was demonstrably superior to benchmark oral therapy with diclofenac sodium over a 2-week period in terms of both efficacy and gastrointestinal tolerability. Flurbiprofen LAT provided both an effective and convenient form of topical SAID treatment.

A clinical evaluation of flurbiprofen LAT and piroxicam gel: a multicentre study in general practice

A prospective, randomized, multicentre, open, crossover study of the comparative efficacy, tolerability and acceptability of two topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) therapies, flurbiprofen local-action transcutaneous (LAT) patch (40 mg b.d.) and piroxicam gel (3 cm, 0.5% q.d.s), was conducted in general practice in the UK in 137 men and women with soft-tissue rheumatism of the shoulder or elbow (e.g. epicondylitis, tendinitis, bursitis and adhesive capsulitis). Patients received one therapy for 4 days before crossing over to the other NSAID for a further 4 days, followed by 6 days of their preferred therapy. Clinical assessment of severity of pain, tenderness and overall clinical condition was carried out at baseline and after 4, 8 and 14 days. Patients self-assessed the severity of pain during the day and at night, and also the quality of their sleep during each treatment phase. More patients showed a greater improvement in all of the clinical assessments of efficacy following treatment with flurbiprofen LAT during the crossover phase. There was a statistically significant reduction in the severity of pain, the principal measure of efficacy, in favour of flurbiprofen LAT: 42% of patients showed greater improvement with flurbiprofen LAT compared with 26% who showed a greater improvement with piroxicam gel (p = 0.012; n = 131, intent-to-treat). Eligible dataset (n = 126) analysis revealed statistically significant differences in favour of flurbiprofen LAT in the severity of lesion tenderness (p = 0.03) and the overall change in clinical condition (p = 0.04) compared with baseline status. Superior efficacy for flurbiprofen LAT was also indicated in the patients' assessment at the end of the crossover phase (day 8), at which 69% chose to continue treatment with flurbiprofen LAT compared with only 31% of patients who chose piroxicam gel (n = 126; p < 0.001). There were, in addition, statistically significant differences in favour of flurbiprofen LAT in assessments for night pain (p < 0.001), quality of sleep (p = 0.004) and the patients' overall opinion of treatment (p < 0.001). Both treatments were well tolerated with a low incidence of mainly local adverse events. These results showed that flurbiprofen LAT had a greater efficacy than piroxicam gel, and was also preferred by patients in the treatment of painful soft-tissue rheumatism of the shoulder and elbow.