Utilization of evidence-based therapy for the secondary prevention of acute coronary syndromes in Australian practice

Implementation of clinical audit to improve adherence to guideline-recommended therapy in acute coronary syndrome

BACKGROUND

Despite global consensus on the management of acute coronary syndrome (ACS), implementation of strategies to improve adherence of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) remains sub-optimal, especially in developing countries. Thus, we aimed to assess the effect of clinical pharmacist-led clinical audit to improve the compliance of discharge prescriptions in patients admitted with ACS. It is a prospective clinical audit of ACS patients which was carried out for 12 months. The discharge prescriptions were audited by clinical pharmacists for the appropriateness in the usage of statins, dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), beta-blockers, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I)/angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB). A feedback report was presented every month to the cardiologists involved in the patient care, and the trend in the adherence to GDMT was analyzed over 12 months.

RESULTS

The discharge prescriptions of 1072 ACS patients were audited for the justifiable and non-justifiable omissions of mandated drugs. The first-month audit revealed unreasonable omissions of DAPT, statin, ACE-I/ARB, and beta-blockers in 1%, 0%, 14%, and 11% respectively, which reduced to nil by the end of the 11th month of the audit-feedback program. This improvement remained unchanged until the end of the 12th month.

CONCLUSIONS

The study revealed that periodic clinical audit significantly improves adherence to GDMT in patients admitted with ACS.

Statin Utilization among Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome: Systematic Review

BACKGROUND: The early use of statin with intensive regimen has been recommended by the recent guidelines as the prevention of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) related events among the high-risk patients. Meanwhile, the inconsistent statin utilization for targeted patient in current practice is still an issue. AIM: This study aims to review the utilization rate of statin among patients with ACS. METHODS: A systematic search of relevant studies published between inceptions to June 2020 was conducted in PubMed. Patients and intervention domains were used to build up the searching formula. A study was eligible for inclusion if it was an original study of patients with ACS and it examined the utilization of statin. The risk of bias was assessed using Axis and NOS checklist. RESULTS: Among the 49 eligible studies, 38 were cohort studies while the others were cross-sectional studies. The utilization rate of statin at hospital admission ranged from 16% to 61% while 25% to 75% during the hospitalization. Of the total studies, 35 studies reported the statin rate at discharge ranging from 58% to 99%. Almost all studies revealed the reduction of statin utilization rate along the follow-up period. The number of statins prescribed was found to be lower among female and elderly patients. CONCLUSION: Despite the established benefits of statin among patients with ACS, our study revealed that statin was underutilized for secondary prevention after ACS. To improve patients’ clinical outcomes with ACS, efforts should be made to increase optimal treatment and compliance with a statin.

Hospital Variability Drives Inconsistency in Antiplatelet Use After Coronary Bypass

BACKGROUND

Continuation of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) after acute myocardial infarction is recommended by current guidelines. We sought to evaluate guideline adherence over time and factors associated with postoperative DAPT within a regional consortium.

METHODS

Isolated CABG patients from 2011 to 2017 who had a myocardial infarction within 21 days prior to surgery were included. Patients were stratified by DAPT prescription at discharge and by time period, early (2011-2014) vs late (2015-2017). Hierarchical regressions were then performed to evaluate factors influencing DAPT use after CABG.

RESULTS

A total of 7314 patients were included with an overall rate of DAPT utilization of 31.2% that increased from 29.6% in the early to 33.4% in the late era (P < .01). There was considerable variability in hospital rates of DAPT (range 9.5%-92.1%) and hospital level changes over time (26% increased, 11% decreased, and 63% remained stable). After adjustment for clinical factors, era was not associated with DAPT use but treating hospital remained significantly associated with DAPT use. Other clinical factors associated with increased DAPT utilization included off-pump surgery (odds ratio [OR] 4.48, P < .01) and prior percutaneous coronary intervention (OR 2.02, P < .01), and atrial fibrillation (OR 0.39, P < .01) was associated with decreased utilization.

CONCLUSIONS

Dual antiplatelet use has increased between 2011 and 2017, driven primarily by evolving patient demographics. Significant hospital-level variability drives inconsistency in DAPT utilization. Efforts to promote DAPT use for patients treated with CABG after myocardial infarction in concordance with current guidelines should be targeted at the hospital level.

Health care utilisation and medication one year after myocardial infarction in Germany - a claims data analysis

BACKGROUND

After myocardial infarction, guidelines recommend pharmaceutical treatment with a combination of five different types of drugs for prevention in patients. However, studies from different countries have shown that this goal is not achieved in many patients. The aim of this study was to assess both healthcare and prescribed pharmaceutical treatment in the fourth quarter after index myocardial infarction.

METHODS

We conducted a claims data analysis with the data of patients who had had a myocardial infarction in the years 2013 or 2014, using information from the largest German health insurance fund ('AOK'). We analysed contact with physicians, hospital care and actual prescriptions for medication recommended in international guidelines, referring to beta-blockers, ACE inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers, P2Y12-antiplatelet agents, acetylsalicylic acid and statins, one year after myocardial infarction. Analysis was stratified by age and sex, compared between patient groups and over time.

RESULTS

We identified 2352 patients who had survived myocardial infarction. Some 96.9% of these participants had at least one contact with their general practitioner (GP) one year after myocardial infarction, 22.8% contacted a cardiologist and 19.7% were hospitalised. Prescription rates range from 37.8% for acetylsalicylic acid to 70.4% for ACE inhibitors. However, only 24.1% received statins, beta-blockers, ACE inhibitors and an antiplatelet drug simultaneously. Prescription of recommended drugs after myocardial infarction decreased steadily over time.

DISCUSSION

Long-term medical prevention after myocardial infarction is improvable. GPs should take care of the pharmaceutical prevention after myocardial infarction as they are the physicians seen most intensively in this period.

Guideline-Based Critical Care Pathway Improves Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome

Implementation of a critical care pathway (CCP) for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) has been shown to improve early compliance to guideline-directed therapies and reduce early mortality. Nevertheless its long-term impact on the compliance with medications or clinical outcomes remains unknown. Between 2004 and 2015, 2023 consecutive patients were admitted to our coronary care unit with ACS. We retrospectively compared the outcomes of 628 versus 1059 patients (mean age 66.1 ± 13.3 years, 74% male) managed before and after full implementation of a CCP. Compared with standard care, implementation of the CCP significantly increased coronary revascularization and long-term compliance with guideline-directed medical therapy (both P < 0.01). After a mean follow-up of 66.5 ± 44.0 months, 46.7% and 22.2% patients admitted before and after implementation of the CCP, respectively, died. Kaplan-Meier analyses showed that patients managed by CCP had better overall survival (P = 0.03) than those managed with standard care. After adjustment for clinical covariates and coronary anatomy, CCP remained independently predictive of better survival from all-cause mortality [hazard ratio (HR): 0.75, 95%confidence intervals (CI): 0.62–0.92, P < 0.01]. Stepwise multivariate cox regression model showed that both revascularization (HR: 0.55, 95%CI: 0.45–0.68, P < 0.01) and compliance to statin (HR: 0.70, 95%CI: 0.58–0.85, P < 0.01) were accountable for the improved outcome.

Development and clinical application of an evidence-based pharmaceutical care service algorithm in acute coronary syndrome

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Drug therapies are critical for preventing secondary complications in acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The purpose of this study was to develop and apply a pharmaceutical care service (PCS) algorithm for ACS and confirm that it is applicable through a prospective clinical trial.

METHODS

The ACS-PCS algorithm was developed according to extant evidence-based treatment and pharmaceutical care guidelines. Quality assurance was conducted through two methods: literature comparison and expert panel evaluation. The literature comparison was used to compare the content of the algorithm with the referenced guidelines. Expert evaluations were conducted by nine experts for 75 questionnaire items. A trial was conducted to confirm its effectiveness. Seventy-nine patients were assigned to either the pharmacist-included multidisciplinary team care (MTC) group or the usual care (UC) group. The endpoints of the trial were the prescription rate of two important drugs, readmission, emergency room (ER) visit and mortality.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The main frame of the algorithm was structured with three tasks: medication reconciliation, medication optimization and transition of care. The contents and context of the algorithm were compliant with class I recommendations and the main service items from the evidence-based guidelines. Opinions from the expert panel were mostly positive. There were significant differences in beta-blocker prescription rates in the overall period (P = .013) and ER visits (four cases, 9.76%, P = .016) in the MTC group compared to the UC group, respectively.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

We developed a PCS algorithm for ACS based on the contents of evidence-based drug therapy and the core concept of pharmacist services.

Association of Guideline-Based Admission Treatments and Life Expectancy After Myocardial Infarction in Elderly Medicare Beneficiaries

BACKGROUND

Guideline-based admission therapies for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) significantly improve 30-day survival, but little is known about their association with long-term outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluated the association of 5 AMI admission therapies (aspirin, beta-blockers, acute reperfusion therapy, door-to-balloon [D2B] time ≤90 min, and time to fibrinolysis ≤30 min) with life expectancy and years of life saved after AMI.

METHODS

We analyzed data from the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project, a study of Medicare beneficiaries hospitalized for AMI, with 17 years of follow-up. Life expectancy and years of life saved after AMI were calculated using Cox proportional hazards regression with extrapolation using exponential models.

RESULTS

Survival for recipients and non-recipients of the 5 guideline-based therapies diverged early after admission and continued to diverge during 17-year follow-up. Receipt of aspirin, beta-blockers, and acute reperfusion therapy on admission was associated with longer life expectancy of 0.78 (standard error [SE]: 0.05), 0.55 (SE: 0.06), and 1.03 (SE: 0.12) years, respectively. Patients receiving primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) within 90 min lived 1.08 (SE: 0.49) years longer than patients with D2B times >90 min, and door-to-needle (D2N) times ≤30 min were associated with 0.55 (SE: 0.12) more years of life. A dose-response relationship was observed between longer D2B and D2N times and shorter life expectancy after AMI.

CONCLUSIONS

Guideline-based therapy for AMI admission is associated with both early and late survival benefits, and results in meaningful gains in life expectancy and large numbers of years of life saved in elderly patients.

Temporal Trends in Polypharmacy and Hyperpolypharmacy in Older New Zealanders over a 9-Year Period: 2005–2013

BACKGROUND

Polypharmacy and hyperpolypharmacy are proxy indicators for inappropriate medicine use. Inappropriate medicine use in older people leads to adverse clinical outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

The objectives of this study were to investigate the prevalence and trends of polypharmacy and hyperpolypharmacy in older people in New Zealand from 2005 to 2013, analyzing the pharmaceutical collections maintained by the Ministry of Health.

METHODS

A repeated cross-sectional analysis of population-level dispensing data was conducted from January 1, 2005 to December 31, 2013. Polypharmacy and hyperpolypharmacy in individuals were defined as the use of 5-9 medicines and ≥10 medicines, respectively, dispensed concurrently for a period of ≥90 days. Differences in polypharmacy and hyperpolypharmacy between 2005 and 2013 were examined. A multinomial regression model was used to predict sociodemographic characteristics associated with polypharmacy and hyperpolypharmacy.

RESULTS

Polypharmacy and hyperpolypharmacy were found to be higher in 2013 compared to 2005 (polypharmacy: 29.5 vs. 23.4%, p<0.001; hyperpolypharmacy: 2.1 vs. 1.3%, p<0.001). The risk of polypharmacy and hyperpolypharmacy was higher in females, in those aged 80-84 years, in the Māori population (for polypharmacy) and the Middle Eastern, Latin American, or African population (for hyperpolypharmacy), in people living in the Southern-district health board, and in individuals with increasing deprivation.

CONCLUSION

The population of New Zealand is aging and the number of older people with multiple chronic conditions is increasing. The proportion of older people exposed to polypharmacy and hyperpolypharmacy has increased in 2013 compared to 2005. Our study provides important information to alert health policy makers, researchers, and clinicians about the dire need to reduce the medication burden in older New Zealanders.

Optimal medical therapy for secondary prevention after an acute coronary syndrome: 18-month follow-up results at a tertiary teaching hospital in South Korea

Background

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a fatal cardiovascular disease caused by atherosclerotic plaque erosion or rupture and formation of coronary thrombus. The latest guidelines for ACS recommend the combined drug regimen, comprising aspirin, P2Y₁₂ inhibitor, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin II receptor blocker, β-blocker, and statin, at discharge after ACS treatment to reduce recurrent ischemic cardiovascular events. This study aimed to examine prescription patterns of secondary prevention drugs in Korean patients with ACS after hospital discharge, to access the appropriateness of secondary prevention drug therapy for ACS, and to evaluate whether to persistently use discharge medications for 18 months.

Methods

This study was retrospectively conducted with the patients who were discharged from the tertiary hospital, located in South Korea, after ACS treatment between September 2009 and August 2013. Data were collected through electronic medical record.

Results

Among 3,676 patients during the study period, 494 were selected based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. The regimen of aspirin + clopidogrel + β-blocker + angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin II receptor blocker + statin was prescribed to 374 (75.71%) patients with ACS at discharge. Specifically, this regimen was used in 177 (69.69%) unstable angina patients, 44 (70.97%) non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients, and 153 (85.96%) ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients. Compared with the number of ACS patients with all five guideline-recommended drugs at discharge, the number of ACS patients using them 12 (n=169, 34.21%) and 18 (n=105, 21.26%) months after discharge tended to be gradually decreased.

Conclusion

The majority of ACS patients in this study received all five guideline-recommended medications at discharge from the hospital. However, the frequency of using all of them had been gradually decreased 3, 6, 12, and 18 months after discharge compared with that at discharge. Careful monitoring of adherence on ACS secondary prevention medications may help improve the outcomes of ACS patients in terms of recurrent ischemic cardiovascular events.

Evidence-to-practice gaps in the management of community-dwelling Australian patients with ischaemic heart disease

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Ischaemic heart disease (IHD) is a major cause of death in developed countries. Patients with IHD are at greater risk of subsequent myocardial infarction (MI). International studies suggest that guideline recommended therapies proven to reduce this risk are underutilised. The objectives of this study were to review the use of guideline-recommended medications for the secondary prevention of IHD in Australians and identify patient characteristics influencing use of these medications.

METHODS

The medication regimens of community dwelling Australians with documented IHD who received a Home Medicines Review (HMR) between January 2010 and September 2012 were extracted from a pharmacist decision support software database and retrospectively reviewed. Each patient's use of antithrombotics; angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs); statins; and β-blockers (BBs) or non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (CCBs) was evaluated in conjunction with documented contraindications. Guideline concordance in all four categories was classified as 'Optimal Medical Therapy' (OMT). Univariate and multivariate analyses identified patient characteristics influencing OMT use.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Of the 5396 patient medication regimens reviewed, 24·3% demonstrated OMT. Guideline concordance was observed in 91·6%, 75·6%, 74·8%, and 42·4% of patients for antithrombotics, statins, ACEI/ARBs, and BB/CCBs, respectively. The independent predictors of not receiving OMT were age 75 years or over (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 0·76; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0·67-0·87), asthma (AOR 0·69; 95% CI 0·57-0·84), and depression or anxiety (AOR 0·84; 95% CI 0·71-0·99). Diabetes (AOR 1·20; 95% CI 1·04-1·38), hypertension (AOR 1·56; 95% CI 1·36-1·79) and a high Charlson Comorbidity Index score (AOR 1·37; 95% CI 1·15-1·64) independently predicted receipt of OMT.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

Only one quarter of community dwelling Australian patients with IHD receive antithrombotics, ACEI/ARBs, BB/CCBs and statins. The potential consequences of these evidence-to-practice gaps are exacerbated by Australia's increasing prevalence of IHD. Healthcare professionals must work to ensure that recommended therapies are prescribed and adhered to long-term, especially in the elderly and patients with asthma and mental health problems, to reduce IHD-related mortality and morbidity and the consequent healthcare and financial impact.

Physicians' adherence to acute coronary syndrome prescribing guidelines in Vietnamese hospital practice: a cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVES

To determine the extent of physicians' adherence to prescribing guidelines for acute coronary syndrome in Vietnamese hospitals.

METHODS

Retrospective cross-sectional study of medical records of all patients with ACS admitted to two public hospitals in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, from January to December 2013. Percentages of eligible patients receiving guideline-recommended medications were determined. Factors associated with non-adherence were identified using multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

Overall, 711 medical records were reviewed and 284 patients fulfilled inclusion criteria (mean age 64 years; 69.4% male). Of those patients eligible for treatment, aspirin was prescribed for 97.9% at arrival and 96.3% at discharge; dual antiplatelet therapy was prescribed for 92.3% at arrival and 91.7% at discharge; loading doses were prescribed for 79.5% (aspirin) and 55.8% (clopidogrel); beta blockers were prescribed for 58.7% at arrival and 76.7% at discharge; angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (ACEI/ARB) were prescribed for 89.1% at arrival or discharge; and statins were prescribed for 94.1% at arrival and 90.7% at discharge. Patients undergoing an invasive procedure were more likely to receive guideline-recommended medications at discharge: dual antiplatelet therapy (OR 3.77; 95% CI 1.23-11.52), beta blocker (OR 3.95; 95% CI 1.86-8.40) and ACEI/ARB (OR 4.01; 95% CI 1.30-12.41). Ninety of the excluded patients were discharged without completing treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

In general, physicians closely adhered to ACS prescribing guidelines in Vietnamese hospital practice. Prescribing of beta blockers and clopidogrel loading doses was probably suboptimal. Why patients do not complete treatment needs to be investigated.

Evidence-based prescribing of drugs for secondary prevention of acute coronary syndrome in Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal patients admitted to Western Australian hospitals

AIMS

To assess the level of evidence-based drug prescribing for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) at discharge from Western Australian (WA) hospitals and determine predictors of such prescribing in Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal patients.

METHODS

All Aboriginal (2002-2004) and a random sample of non-Aboriginal (2003) hospital admissions with a principal diagnosis of ACS were extracted from the WA Hospital Morbidity Data Collection of WA Data Linkage System. Clinical information, history of co-morbidities and drugs were collected from medical notes by trained data collectors. Evidence-based prescribing (EBP) was defined as prescribing of aspirin, statin and beta-blocker or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin II antagonist.

RESULTS

Records for 1717 ACS patients discharged alive from hospitals were reviewed. The majority of patients (71%) had EBP, and there was no significant difference between Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal patients (70% vs 71%, P = 0.36). Conversely, a significantly higher proportion of Aboriginal patients had none of the drugs prescribed compared with non-Aboriginal patients (11% vs 7%, P < 0.01). EBP for ACS was independently associated with male sex (odds ratio (OR) 1.63, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.26-2.11), previous admission for ACS (OR 1.83, 95% CI 1.39-2.42) and diabetes (OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.04-1.79). However, ACS patients living in regional and remote areas, attending district or private hospitals, or with a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were significantly less likely to have ACS drugs prescribed at discharge.

CONCLUSIONS

Opportunity exists to improve prescribing of recommended drugs for ACS patients at discharge from WA hospitals in both Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal patients. Attention regarding pharmaceutical management post-ACS is particularly required for patients from rural and remote areas, and those attending district and private hospitals.

Influence of hospitalisation on the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers in elderly hypertensive patients

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The underutilization of beneficial cardiovascular medications such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) in the elderly patients continues to be a matter of concern. The aim of the presented study was to compare the prescription of ACEI and ARB in elderly hypertensive patients at the time of hospital admission and discharge and to identify patient-related factors which determine the prescription of ACEI/ARB.

METHODS

The study sample (n = 1111) was selected from 2,157 patients hospitalised at long-term care departments of three municipal hospitals during the period between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2009 and included hypertensive patients aged ≥65 years suffering from myocardial infarction, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, diabetes mellitus or nephropathy.

RESULTS

In hypertensive patients with myocardial infarction, diabetes mellitus and nephropathy, a significant increase was found in the use of ACEI/ARB during hospitalisation. However, there was no similar change in the use of such medications during hospitalisation in patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation. Age ≥85 years (OR = 0.59 and OR = 0.50 at hospital admission and discharge, respectively), depression (OR = 0.63 at hospital discharge) and the systolic blood pressure ≤115 mmHg (OR = 0.45 at hospital discharge) decreased the probability of ACEI/ARB prescription. On the other hand, increasing the number of evaluated co-morbid conditions increased the patient's likelihood of being an "ACEI/ARB user" (OR = 1.20 at hospital discharge).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study has identified a subset of elderly hypertensive patients (with heart failure, atrial fibrillation) in whom the use of ACEI/ARB could be improved.

Use of evidence-based pharmacotherapy for secondary prevention of coronary heart disease: a Chinese medicine hospital versus a general hospital

OBJECTIVE

To determine differences in adherence to secondary prevention guidelines (pharmacological interventions) among coronary heart disease (CHD) patients between a Chinese medicine (CM) hospital and a general hospital in a Chinese city.

METHODS

Medical records of 200 patients consecutively discharged from the CM hospital and the general hospital for CHD were reviewed to determine the proportions of eligible patients who received antiplatelet agents, β-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) and statins at discharge. The effects of patient characteristics and hospital type on the use of these medicines were estimated using logistic regression models.

RESULTS

Patients discharged from the CM hospitals were older; more likely females; had greater history of hyperlipidemia, cerebrovascular diseases and less smoker (P<0.01 or P<0.05). They were less likely to receive coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention, and had a longer length of stay than those discharged from the general hospital (P<0.01 or P<0.05). There were no significant differences in antiplatelet agents (96% vs. 100%, P=0.121) or statins (97.9% vs. 100%, P=0.149) use between the CM hospital and the general hospital. In multivariable analyses that adjusted for patient characteristics and hospital type, there was no significant difference in use of β-blockers between the CM hospital and the general hospital. In contrast, patients discharged from the CM hospital were less likely to receive ACE inhibitors/ARBs compared with those discharged from the general hospital (odds ratio: 0.3, 95% confidence interval: 0.105-0.854).

CONCLUSION

In this study, the CM hospital provides the same quality of care in CHD for prescribing evidence-based medications at discharge compared with another general hospital except for ACE inhibitors/ARBs use.

Use of evidence-based therapy for the secondary prevention of acute coronary syndromes in Malaysian practice

RATIONALE

Despite the availability of various prevention guidelines on acute coronary syndrome (ACS), secondary prevention practice utilizing aspirin, beta-blockers, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and statins still can be sub-optimal.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To review and document the utilization of pharmacotherapy for the secondary prevention of ACS in patients discharged from a Malaysian hospital.

METHODS

A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted at a tertiary hospital in Penang, Malaysia. Patients with a primary diagnosis of ACS were identified from medical records over a 4-month period. A range of clinical data was extracted from medical records, including medical history, clinical presentation and pharmacotherapy both on admission and at discharge. This audit focused on the use of four guideline-recommended therapies: aspirin ± clopidogrel, beta-blockers, statins and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI)/angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs).

RESULTS

Data pertaining to a total of 380 ACS patients was extracted and reviewed, the mean age of the study population was 57.49 years and 73.9% of population was males. Patients with unstable angina accounted for 56.6% of the admissions whereas 23.4% and 20% of the patients were admitted for ST-elevation myocardial infarction and non-ST-segment elevation infarct respectively. 95.7% of the patients received antiplatelets comprising of at least aspirin, and 82% received aspirin plus clopidogrel. Furthermore, 80.3% of the patients received a beta-blocker at discharge, 95% a statin and 69.7% received either an ACEI or ARB. Compared with patients who presented with myocardial infarction (with or without ST-segment elevation), those presenting with unstable angina were less likely to receive the combination of aspirin plus clopidogrel or an ACEI/ARB at discharge. Patients over 65 years of age were also less likely to receive a beta-blocker at discharge, compared with younger patients.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a good adherence to evidence-based guidelines for the secondary prevention of ACS in this local setting. However, there is some potential underutilization in the older population and patients presenting with unstable angina.

Frequency of intensive statin therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome admitted to a tertiary care center

Intensive statin therapy (IST) has been shown to decrease cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Numerous studies have described statin use for secondary prevention; however, few data have highlighted IST use after ACS. The objective of the present study was to describe IST use in an ACS population before hospitalization, on discharge, and during early follow-up after discharge. A retrospective chart review was conducted of randomly selected patients admitted to a tertiary care center from November 1, 2007 to October 31, 2008. Eligible patients included adults admitted to cardiology with a most responsible diagnosis of ACS (International Classification of Diseases code 20-25). The exclusion criteria included transfer to another hospital or cardiovascular surgery ward and in-hospital death. Phase 1 included an inpatient chart review. Phase 2 was a follow-up cardiologist clinic letter review that included only patients who started IST in-hospital. Of 234 charts reviewed, 111 (47%) patients met the inclusion criteria (mean age 65 ± 11.7 years, 76% men). Most patients (93%) were discharged with a statin. However, although 72% of the study population were eligible for IST, only 52% had IST during hospitalization. Of the patients who started IST with clinic letters available (n = 31), 68% continued IST (mean interval to follow-up 85 days, range 33 to 208). In conclusion, although statin use is good, IST use after ACS is suboptimal. Additionally, newly initiated IST demonstrates poor persistence after discharge.

Socio-demographic differences in adherence to evidence-based drug therapy after hospital discharge from acute myocardial infarction: a population-based cohort study in Rome, Italy

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Adherence to evidence-based drug therapy after acute myocardial infarction has increased over the last decades, but is still unsatisfactory. Our objectives are to set out to analyse patterns of evidence-based drug therapy after acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and evaluating socio-demographic differences.

METHODS

A cohort of 3920 AMI patients discharged from hospital in Rome (2006-2007) was selected. Drugs claimed during the 12 months after discharge were retrieved. Drug utilization was defined as density of use (boxes claimed/individual follow-up; chronic use = 6+ boxes/365 days) and therapeutic coverage, calculated through Defined Daily Doses (chronic use: ≥80% of individual follow-up). Patterns of use of single drugs and their combination were described. The association between poly-therapy and gender, age and socio-economic position (small-area composite index based on census data) was analysed through logistic regression, accounting for potential confounders.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Most patients used single drugs: 90·5% platelet aggregation inhibitors (antiplatelets), 60·0%β-blockers, 78·1% agents acting on the renin-angiotensin system (ACEIs/ARBs), 77·8% HMG CoA reductase inhibitors (statins). Percentages of patients with ≥80% of therapeutic coverage were 81·9% for antiplatelets, 17·8% for β-blockers, 64·4% for ACEIs/ARBs and 76·1% for statins. The multivariate analysis showed gender and age differences in adherence to poly-therapy (females: OR = 0·84; 95% CI 0·72-0·99; 71-80 years age-group: OR = 0·82; 95% CI 0·68-0·99). No differences were observed with respect to socio-economic position.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

The availability of information systems offers the opportunity to monitor the quality of care and identify weaknesses in public health-care systems. Our results identify specific factors contributing to non-adherence and hence define areas for more targeted health-care interventions. Our results suggest that efforts to improve adherence should focus on women and older patients.

Use of Evidence-Based Therapy for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Events Among Older people

Evidence-based therapies (EBTs) for the prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) are reportedly underutilized in older people. The primary purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of EBTs for the prevention of CVD events in older people and secondarily whether a Home Medicines Review (HMR) service by pharmacists’ predicts the use of these medicines. A retrospective cross-sectional audit of HMR reports pertaining to 608 community-dwelling older people (≥65 years) was conducted. EBTs considered for this audit included four guideline-recommended therapies for CVD: antithrombotic therapy (warfarin ± antiplatelet therapy), β-blockers, statins, and angiotensin agents (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors [ACEI] ± angiotensin II receptor blockers [ARBs]). The prevalence of EBT use among the older people, mean age (SD) 75.6 (7.5) years, was: 73% for antithrombotic therapy, 75% for statins, 74% for angiotensin therapy, and 35% for β-blockers. CVD risk factors warranting treatment with these EBTs were frequently associated with use of EBTs. EBTs were least likely to be used in those with coronary interventions like coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)/stent insertion (all EBTs except angiotensin agents) and angiotensin agents in those with a history of myocardial infarction or chronic heart failure. A pharmacist-led HMR service was significantly associated with the prescribing of all 4 EBTs. The results from this study show good adherence to evidence-based guidelines in general, although there is still room for improvement to further optimize clinical outcomes in these complex patients. The study also adds to the available literature on the effectiveness of pharmacists’ collaborative contribution to the care of these high-risk patients.