The effect of pre-hospital statins therapy on incidence of in-hospital death and total MACCE in patients with PCI

Associations of pre-hospital statin treatment with in-hospital outcomes and severity of coronary artery disease in patients with first acute coronary syndrome-findings from the CCC-ACS project

Background

The current burden of dyslipidemia, the pre-hospital application of statins and the association of pre-hospital statins with the severity of coronary artery disease (CAD) and in-hospital outcomes in Chinese patients with first acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are very significant and remain unclear.

Methods

A total of 41,183 patients who underwent coronary angiography and were diagnosed with ACS for the first time from a nationwide registry study (CCC-ACS) were enrolled. The severity of CAD was assessed using the CAD prognostic index (CADPI). The patients were classified into statin and non-statin groups according to their pre-hospital statin treatment status. Clinical characteristics, CADPI and in-hospital outcomes were compared, and a logistic regression analysis was performed to determine whether pre-hospital statin therapy is associated with in-hospital outcomes and CADPI. A sensitivity analysis was used to further explore the issues above.

Results

The non-statin group had more in-hospital all-cause deaths (1.2 vs. 0.8%, P = 0.010). However, no association exists between statin pretreatment and in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) or all-cause deaths in the entire population and subgroups (all P > 0.05). Surprisingly, statin pretreatment was associated with an 8.9% higher risk of severely obstructive CAD (CADPI ≥ 37) (OR, 1.089; 95% CI, 1.010-1.175, P = 0.028), and similar results were observed in subgroups of females, those aged 50 to 75 years, and patients with hypertension.

Conclusion

Statin pretreatment was not related to MACEs or all-cause death during hospital stay, but it was associated with a higher risk of increased angiographic severity in patients with first ACS.

Update on the efficacy of statin treatment in acute coronary syndromes

BACKGROUND

The natural history of atherosclerosis might involve coronary plaque rupture/erosion, thrombus formation and vessel lumen occlusion, clinically recognized as acute coronary syndrome (ACS). International guidelines strongly recommend early statin administration in patients admitted for ACS. In addition to lowering circulating levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c), statin treatment was shown to promote plaque stabilization or regression in several ways, including reduction in necrotic lipid core, anti-inflammatory effects and improvement in endothelial function. The aim of this review is to summarize clinical evidence on the role of statins in secondary prevention of ACS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This narrative review is based on the material found on medline and pubmed up to August 2013. We looked for the terms 'statin, acute coronary syndromes' in combination with 'atherosclerosis, acute myocardial infarction, pathophysiology'.

RESULTS

This review article emphasizes the relevance of the timing of statin administration to improve the outcomes after ACS. Early and continuous statin administration has emerged as key features to prevent adverse events, especially in patients admitted for ACS undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Clinical trials matching the improved clinical outcome with the imaging of atherosclerotic plaque stabilization/regression, further supporting the effectiveness of statin therapy. However, the achievement of these goals requires high dose of statins, thus increasing the risk of adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Although clinical trials and meta-analyses have provided conflicting results, it is likely that in clinical practice, the rate of adverse events is higher, so that many concerns still remain about a statin high-dose approach in ACS patients.

Can a high reloading dose of atorvastatin prior to percutaneous coronary intervention reduce periprocedural myocardial infarction?

BACKGROUND

Periprocedural myocardial infarction (MI) is a common complication following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and statins have been shown to reduce MI in statin-naïve patients. We aimed to identify whether a high reloading dose of atorvastatin can prevent MI following PCI in patients who were already being treated with statins.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this triple-blind controlled randomized clinical trial, 190 candidates for elective PCI, who were already using statins and/or other lipid lowering agents such as fibrates, were randomly assigned to two equal groups to receive either atorvastatin (80 mg) or placebo within 24 hours before the procedure. Serum levels of creatinine kinase myocardial isoenzyme (CK-MB), cardiac troponin I (cTNI) and high-sensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) were measured at baseline and then 6 and 12 hours following PCI. Post-procedural MI was defined as troponin elevation>5-fold in patients with normal baseline or >20% in those with elevated baseline measurements with or without chest pain or ST segment or T wave abnormalities.

RESULTS

Frequency of MI in the atorvastatin group was 3 (3.1%) vs. 10 (10.5%) in the placebo group (p=0.04). The CK-MB rise within 6 hours following PCI was 0.6±0.3 mg/dl in the intervention group versus 3.0±1.6 mg/dl in the placebo group. Also, the levels of cTNI within 6 and 12 hours in the intervention group was significantly lower than the placebo group (p=0.01 and 0.008, respectively). hs-CRP was significantly lower in the intervention group after 12 hours (p=0.004).

CONCLUSION

Administration of a high reloading dose of atorvastatin within 24 hours before PCI could significantly reduce the frequency of periprocedural MI. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION CODE: IRCT201205209768N1.

Effect of statins therapy prior to percutaneous coronary intervention

BACKGROUND

Many previous studies have demonstrated that statins pre-treatment before percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) reduced myocardial infarction (MI) in statin-naive patients with both stable angina and acute coronary syndrome. However, clinical benefit of statins is controversial as some studies have shown different results.

METHODS

A search of MEDLINE, EMBASE using the term statins AND PCI, statins AND percutaneous coronary intervention. The review was limited to articles published in English between January 1990 and July 2011.

RESULTS

Most trials noted that statins pretreatment before PCI in patients are associated with risk reduction of periprocedural myocardial infarction (PMI) and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). The mechanisms underlying this protective action of statins possibly attribute to the pleiotropic effects. However, controversial results were also reported in some trials that early use of statins before PCI did not influence occurrence of PMI or long-term clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Statins therapy among PCI patients seems to be associated with a significant mortality advantage at early and long-term follow-up. However, currently early statins use before intervention still cannot serve as a routine strategy of treatment. Further large-scale randomized studies are critically required to demonstrate the importance of early treatment with statins in pre-PCI.