Correlation between serum lipoprotein(a) and angiographic coronary artery disease in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus

Lipoprotein(a), type 2 diabetes and vascular risk in coronary patients

BACKGROUND

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is an important cardiovascular risk factor in the general population. However, prospective data on the vascular risk conferred by Lp(a) in patients with diabetes mellitus are scarce and controversial. It is not known whether the diabetic state affects the association of Lp(a) with vascular events among coronary patients.

DESIGN

We measured Lp(a) in 587 consecutive patients undergoing coronary angiography for the evaluation of coronary artery disease. The incidence of vascular events was recorded over 4 years.

RESULTS

At baseline, Lp(a) was significantly lower in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) (n = 136) than in nondiabetic individuals (11 (0.8-30) mg dL(-1) vs. 16 (0.8-51) mg dL(-1); P = 0.025). Prospectively, Lp(a) was a strong and independent predictor of vascular events in nondiabetic patients (standardized adjusted hazard ratio (HR) = 1.461 (1.121-1.904); P = 0.005), but not in patients with T2DM [HR = 0.812 (0.539-1.223); P = 0.320]. An interaction term diabetes x Lp(a) was significant (P = 0.008), indicating that Lp(a) was a significantly stronger predictor of vascular events in nondiabetic patients than in patients with T2DM.

CONCLUSIONS

Lp(a) in diabetic coronary patients is low and not associated with the incidence of vascular events. Although measurement of Lp(a) provides useful information in nondiabetic coronary patients, it is of little value in coronary patients with T2DM.

Lipids and lipoprotein(a) concentrations in Tunisian type 2 diabetic patients; Relationship to glycemic control and coronary heart disease

The aim of this study was to evaluate plasma lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] concentrations in Tunisian patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM), to correlate the values with other lipid parameters, and to examine the relationship to glycemic control and coronary heart disease (CHD). Diabetic patients with and without CHD (n=200) had significantly higher levels of Lp(a) (327.94+/-239.93 mg/l) and a greater proportion of elevated (>300 mg/l) Lp(a) concentrations (46%) compared with 100 healthy nondiabetic controls (269.83+/-225.6 mg/l, P<.01, and 26%, P<.01), while there were no statistically significant difference between diabetics without CHD (n=100) and controls. No significant association of Lp(a) with glycemic control (HbAlc or fasting blood glucose) was noted in diabetic patients. Positive correlations were observed between Lp(a) levels and total cholesterol and LDL-C in all diabetic patients and particularly in diabetic men. Male patients with CHD showed significantly higher plasma Lp(a) levels than those without CHD (P=.023), and 57.3% of patients with CHD showed increase (>300 mg/l) Lp(a) compared with 33.3% of patients without CHD. Elevated levels of Lp (a) and abnormal lipid profile in diabetic men suggest their involvement in atherogenesis and subsequent development of CHD.

Association of lipoprotein(a) levels and apolipoprotein(a) phenotypes with coronary artery disease in Type 2 diabetic patients and in non-diabetic subjects

AIMS

We investigated whether in Type 2 diabetic patients lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) levels and apolipoprotein(a) (apo(a)) polymorphism are associated with angiographically documented coronary artery disease (CAD). We also examined whether there are differences in the distributions of Lp(a) levels and apo(a) phenotypes between CAD patients with and without diabetes.

METHODS

A hundred and seven diabetic patients with CAD, 274 diabetic patients without CAD, 201 non-diabetic patients with CAD, and 358 controls were enrolled.

RESULTS

Diabetic patients with CAD showed Lp(a) levels (21.2 +/- 17.7 vs. 15.1 +/- 17.8 mg/dl; P = 0.0018) and a percentage of subjects with at least one apo(a) isoform of low molecular weight (MW) (67.2% vs. 27.7%; P = 0.0000) significantly greater than diabetic patients without CAD. Multivariate analysis showed that in diabetic patients Lp(a) levels and apo(a) phenotypes were significantly associated with CAD; odds ratios (ORs) of high Lp(a) levels for CAD were 2.17 (1.28-3.66), while ORs of the presence of at least one apo(a) isoform of low MW were 5.35 (3.30-8.60). Lp(a) levels (30.2 +/- 23.7 vs. 21.2 +/- 17.7 mg/dl; P = 0.0005) and the percentage of subjects with at least one apo(a) isoform of low MW (87.0% vs. 67.2%; P = 0.0001) were significantly higher in CAD patients without than in those with diabetes.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that Lp(a) levels and apo(a) phenotypes are independently associated with CAD in Type 2 diabetic patients; thus both these parameters may be helpful in selecting diabetic subjects at high genetic cardiovascular risk. However, Lp(a) levels and apo(a) polymorphism seem to be cardiovascular risk factors less important in diabetic than in non-diabetic subjects. Diabet. Med. 18, 589-594 (2001)

Lipoprotein(a), homocysteine, and remnantlike particles: emerging risk factors

Although lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] was first described more than 35 years ago, adequate prospective data have only recently supported Lp(a) as an independent risk factor for coronary heart disease (CHD). In vitro studies suggest that Lp(a) contributes to atherogenesis directly by cholesterol uptake and indirectly by the inhibition of fibrinolysis. In patients with CHD or a significant risk for CHD, Lp(a) should be measured and treated with either niacin or estrogen if the patient has Lp(a) cholesterol levels of more than 10 mg/dL or an Lp(a) mass of more than 30 mg/dL. In addition, homocysteine and remnantlike lipoprotein cholesterol are strongly supported by prospective or population-based prevalence data as independent risk factors for CHD. Homocysteine levels of more than 14 mumol/L should be treated with vitamin supplements of folate, B6, and B12. Remnantlike lipoprotein cholesterol is the product of a novel immunoassay that separates the partially hydrolyzed triglyceride-rich remnant particles. The association of these particles with CHD risk in women may explain the small independent CHD risk that triglycerides have in women in the Framingham Heart Study. A clear therapeutic intervention has not been documented but may include diet, fibric acid derivatives, or hydroxymethylglutamyl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors.