1
|
Rasmussen LJH, Petersen JEV, Eugen-Olsen J. Soluble Urokinase Plasminogen Activator Receptor (suPAR) as a Biomarker of Systemic Chronic Inflammation. Front Immunol 2021; 12:780641. [PMID: 34925360 PMCID: PMC8674945 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.780641] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2021] [Accepted: 11/09/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Systemic chronic inflammation (SCI) is persistent, health-damaging, low-grade inflammation that plays a major role in immunosenescence and in development and progression of many diseases. But currently, there are no recognized standard biomarkers to assess SCI levels alone, and SCI is typically measured by combining biomarkers of acute inflammation and infection, e.g., CRP, IL-6, and TNFα. In this review, we highlight 10 properties and characteristics that are shared by the blood protein soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) and SCI, supporting the argument that suPAR is a biomarker of SCI: (1) Expression and release of suPAR is upregulated by immune activation; (2) uPAR and suPAR exert pro-inflammatory functions; (3) suPAR is associated with the amount of circulating immune cells; (4) Blood suPAR levels correlate with the levels of established inflammatory biomarkers; (5) suPAR is minimally affected by acute changes and short-term influences, in contrast to many currently used markers of systemic inflammation; (6) Like SCI, suPAR is non-specifically associated with multiple diseases; (7) suPAR and SCI both predict morbidity and mortality; (8) suPAR and SCI share the same risk factors; (9) suPAR is associated with risk factors and outcomes of inflammation above and beyond other inflammatory biomarkers; (10) The suPAR level can be reduced by anti-inflammatory interventions and treatment of disease. Assessing SCI has the potential to inform risk for morbidity and mortality. Blood suPAR is a newer biomarker which may, in fact, be a biomarker of SCI since it is stably associated with inflammation and immune activation; shares the same risk factors as many age-related diseases; is both elevated by and predicts age-related diseases. There is strong evidence that suPAR is a prognostic marker of adverse events, morbidity, and mortality. It is associated with immune activity and prognosis across diverse conditions, including kidney disease, cardiovascular disease, cancer, diabetes, and inflammatory disorders. Thus, we think it likely represents a common underlying disease-process shared by many diseases; that is, SCI. We review the supporting literature and propose a research agenda that can help test the hypothesis that suPAR indexes SCI, with the potential of becoming the new gold standard for measuring SCI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Line Jee Hartmann Rasmussen
- Department of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Jens Emil Vang Petersen
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Jesper Eugen-Olsen
- Department of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ahn SB, Kamath KS, Mohamedali A, Noor Z, Wu JX, Pascovici D, Adhikari S, Cheruku HR, Guillemin GJ, McKay MJ, Nice EC, Baker MS. Use of a Recombinant Biomarker Protein DDA Library Increases DIA Coverage of Low Abundance Plasma Proteins. J Proteome Res 2021; 20:2374-2389. [PMID: 33752330 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.0c00898] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Credible detection and quantification of low abundance proteins from human blood plasma is a major challenge in precision medicine biomarker discovery when using mass spectrometry (MS). In this proof-of-concept study, we employed a mixture of selected recombinant proteins in DDA libraries to subsequently identify (not quantify) cancer-associated low abundance plasma proteins using SWATH/DIA. The exemplar DDA recombinant protein spectral library (rPSL) was derived from tryptic digestion of 36 recombinant human proteins that had been previously implicated as possible cancer biomarkers from both our own and other studies. The rPSL was then used to identify proteins from nondepleted colorectal cancer (CRC) EDTA plasmas by SWATH-MS. Most (32/36) of the proteins used in the rPSL were reliably identified from CRC plasma samples, including 8 proteins (i.e., BTC, CXCL10, IL1B, IL6, ITGB6, TGFα, TNF, TP53) not previously detected using high-stringency protein inference MS according to PeptideAtlas. The rPSL SWATH-MS protocol was compared to DDA-MS using MARS-depleted and postdigestion peptide fractionated plasmas (here referred to as a human plasma DDA library). Of the 32 proteins identified using rPSL SWATH, only 12 could be identified using DDA-MS. The 20 additional proteins exclusively identified using the rPSL SWATH approach were almost exclusively lower abundance (i.e., <10 ng/mL) proteins. To mitigate justified FDR concerns, and to replicate a more typical library creation approach, the DDA rPSL library was merged with a human plasma DDA library and SWATH identification repeated using such a merged library. The majority (33/36) of the low abundance plasma proteins added from the rPSL were still able to be identified using such a merged library when high-stringency HPP Guidelines v3.0 protein inference criteria were applied to our data set. The MS data set has been deposited to ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE partner repository (PXD022361).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seong Beom Ahn
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, NSW 2109, Australia
| | - Karthik S Kamath
- Australian Proteome Analysis Facility (APAF), Department of Molecular Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, NSW 2109, Australia
| | - Abidali Mohamedali
- Department of Molecular Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, NSW 2109, Australia
| | - Zainab Noor
- ProCan, Children's Medical Research Institute, The University of Sydney, Westmead, Newtown, NSW 2042, Australia
| | - Jemma X Wu
- Australian Proteome Analysis Facility (APAF), Department of Molecular Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, NSW 2109, Australia
| | - Dana Pascovici
- Australian Proteome Analysis Facility (APAF), Department of Molecular Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, NSW 2109, Australia
| | - Subash Adhikari
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, NSW 2109, Australia
| | - Harish R Cheruku
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, NSW 2109, Australia
| | - Gilles J Guillemin
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, NSW 2109, Australia
| | - Matthew J McKay
- Australian Proteome Analysis Facility (APAF), Department of Molecular Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, NSW 2109, Australia
| | - Edouard C Nice
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia
| | - Mark S Baker
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, NSW 2109, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rysenkova KD, Klimovich PS, Shmakova AA, Karagyaur MN, Ivanova KA, Aleksandrushkina NA, Tkachuk VA, Rubina KA, Semina EV. Urokinase receptor deficiency results in EGFR-mediated failure to transmit signals for cell survival and neurite formation in mouse neuroblastoma cells. Cell Signal 2020; 75:109741. [PMID: 32822758 DOI: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2020.109741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2020] [Revised: 08/14/2020] [Accepted: 08/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Urokinase-type plasminogen activator uPA and its receptor (uPAR) are the central players in extracellular matrix proteolysis, which facilitates cancer invasion and metastasis. EGFR is one of the important components of uPAR interactome. uPAR/EGFR interaction controls signaling pathways that regulate cell survival, proliferation and migration. We have previously established that uPA binding to uPAR stimulates neurite elongation in neuroblastoma cells, while blocking uPA/uPAR interaction induces neurite branching and new neurite formation. Here we demonstrate that blocking the uPA binding to uPAR with anti-uPAR antibody decreases the level of pEGFR and its downstream pERK1/2, but does increase phosphorylation of Akt, p38 and c-Src Since long-term uPAR blocking results in a severe DNA damage, accompanied by PARP-1 proteolysis and Neuro2a cell death, we surmise that Akt, p38 and c-Src activation transmits a pro-apoptotic signal, rather than a survival. Serum deprivation resulting in enhanced neuritogenesis is accompanied by an upregulated uPAR mRNA expression, while EGFR mRNA remains unchanged. EGFR activation by EGF stimulates neurite growth only in uPAR-overexpressing cells but not in control or uPAR-deficient cells. In addition, AG1478-mediated inhibition of EGFR activity impedes neurite growth in control and uPAR-deficient cells, but not in uPAR-overexpressing cells. Altogether these data implicate uPAR as an important regulator of EGFR and ERK1/2 signaling, representing a novel mechanism which implicates urokinase system in neuroblastoma cell survival and differentiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K D Rysenkova
- Laboratory of Molecular Endocrinology, Institute of Experimental Cardiology, Federal State Budgetary Organization National Cardiology Research Center Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia; Laboratory of Gene and Cell Technologies, Faculty of Medicine, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia
| | - P S Klimovich
- Laboratory of Molecular Endocrinology, Institute of Experimental Cardiology, Federal State Budgetary Organization National Cardiology Research Center Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia
| | - A A Shmakova
- Laboratory of Molecular Endocrinology, Institute of Experimental Cardiology, Federal State Budgetary Organization National Cardiology Research Center Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia
| | - M N Karagyaur
- Institute of Regenerative Medicine, Medical Research and Education Center, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russian Federation
| | - K A Ivanova
- Laboratory of Gene and Cell Technologies, Faculty of Medicine, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia
| | - N A Aleksandrushkina
- Laboratory of Gene and Cell Technologies, Faculty of Medicine, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia; Institute of Regenerative Medicine, Medical Research and Education Center, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russian Federation
| | - V A Tkachuk
- Laboratory of Molecular Endocrinology, Institute of Experimental Cardiology, Federal State Budgetary Organization National Cardiology Research Center Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia; Laboratory of Gene and Cell Technologies, Faculty of Medicine, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia
| | - K A Rubina
- Laboratory of Morphogenesis and Tissue Reparation, Faculty of Medicine, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.
| | - E V Semina
- Laboratory of Molecular Endocrinology, Institute of Experimental Cardiology, Federal State Budgetary Organization National Cardiology Research Center Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia; Laboratory of Gene and Cell Technologies, Faculty of Medicine, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yalcin S, Demir ME, Ozturk R, Kılınç AŞ, Suer H, Karahan I. Prognostic effects of SuPAR and Neopterin Levels on Patients with Lung Cancer. Pteridines 2020. [DOI: 10.1515/pteridines-2020-0017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Two unique biomarkers, soluble form of the urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) and neopterin, play a crucial role in inflammatory processes. This study aimed to reveal whether it is possible to utilize these biomarkers in predicting tumor prognosis in patients with lung cancers.
Methods: The present study was designed as a single center, prospective, and controlled research. The study was conducted with forty patients with lung cancer (case group) and 41 healthy individuals (control group) in Kırıkkale University, Faculty of Medicine between 2016-2020. The case group was also divided into two of the early and advanced stages. The blood samples were drawn to evaluate suPAR and neopterin levels, and these parameters were compared between the case and control groups. Also, the prognostic effects of age, stage of the tumor, and the levels of mentioned parameters were investigated with the survival analysis.
Results: The median duration of the follow-up was 32 (4-75) months. suPAR and neopterin levels were found to be higher in the case group than in the control group. Cox regression showed that the high levels of neopterin and suPAR increased mortality risk [p=0.002, HR: 1.25 (1.08-1.45 95%CI) and p=0.023, HR:1.07 (1.01-1.13), respectively]. Finally, age and stage of the tumor were found to have no relationship with survival.
Conclusion: suPAR and neopterin as members of the inflammatory pathway were found to be higher in cancer cases. Furthermore, both suPAR and neopterin levels were found to be predictive for the mortality of patients with lung cancers; therefore, they are thought to be used for the management of cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Selim Yalcin
- Kırıkkale University , Department of Medical Oncology , Kirikkale , Turkey , 71100
| | - Mehmet Emin Demir
- Yeni Yuzyil University , Department of Nephrology , Istanbul , Turkey , 34100
| | - Reyhan Ozturk
- Kecioren Training and Education Hospital, Department of Clinical Microbiology and Infection Diseases , Ankara , Turkey , 06310
| | - Aytün Şadan Kılınç
- Ankara Training ve Education Hospital , Department of Clinical Biochemistry , Ankara , Turkey , 06320
| | - Hatice Suer
- Ankara Training ve Education Hospital , Department of Clinical Biochemistry , Ankara , Turkey , 06320
| | - Irfan Karahan
- Kırıkkale University , Department of Internal Medicine , Kirikkale , 71100
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wacker A, Bauder-Wüst U, Schäfer M, Schmidt J, Remde Y, Stadlbauer S, Eder M, Liolios C, Kopka K. Designing tracers for PET imaging of the urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor from a cyclic uPA-derived peptide: first in vitro evaluations. J Labelled Comp Radiopharm 2019; 62:483-494. [PMID: 30970388 DOI: 10.1002/jlcr.3735] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2019] [Accepted: 04/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
The treatment of cancer remains a major challenge, especially after tumour cell dissemination and metastases formation. Expression of the urokinase-type plasminogen activation system including urokinase (uPA) and its receptor (uPAR) has been associated with the complex process of cell migration, a tumour's invasive potential as well as a reduced overall and disease-free survival of patients with solid cancers and haematological disorders. A cyclic peptide cyclo[21,29][d-Cys21 ,Cys29 ]-uPA21-30 was designed from the growth factor-like domain (GFD) of urokinase whose binding to uPAR was found to inhibit tumour growth and spread of human ovarian cancer cells in mice. With the aim of visualising uPAR expression using PET imaging to attempt an estimate on the tumour's aggressiveness, the cyclic peptide was modified with an either C- or N-terminally attached variable spacer and chelator. The free ligands were evaluated for their binding affinities to the isolated human uPAR and labelled with 68 Ga and 177 Lu to assess their lipophilicities and stabilities in human serum. Although retaining the full binding potential displayed by cyclo[21,29][d-Cys21 ,Cys29 ]-uPA21-30 to its target was found to be a challenging task upon both C- and N-terminal modification, chelator-bearing ligands were identified that can serve as promising starting points in the development of uPAR-addressing PET tracers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anja Wacker
- Division of Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Faculty of Biosciences, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ulrike Bauder-Wüst
- Division of Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Martin Schäfer
- Division of Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jana Schmidt
- Division of Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Yvonne Remde
- Division of Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sven Stadlbauer
- Division of Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Matthias Eder
- Department of Radiopharmaca Development, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Clinic of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Christos Liolios
- Division of Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Klaus Kopka
- Division of Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mahmood N, Mihalcioiu C, Rabbani SA. Multifaceted Role of the Urokinase-Type Plasminogen Activator (uPA) and Its Receptor (uPAR): Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Therapeutic Applications. Front Oncol 2018; 8:24. [PMID: 29484286 PMCID: PMC5816037 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 264] [Impact Index Per Article: 44.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2017] [Accepted: 01/24/2018] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
The plasminogen activator (PA) system is an extracellular proteolytic enzyme system associated with various physiological and pathophysiological processes. A large body of evidence support that among the various components of the PA system, urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA), its receptor (uPAR), and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 and -2 (PAI-1 and PAI-2) play a major role in tumor progression and metastasis. The binding of uPA with uPAR is instrumental for the activation of plasminogen to plasmin, which in turn initiates a series of proteolytic cascade to degrade the components of the extracellular matrix, and thereby, cause tumor cell migration from the primary site of origin to a distant secondary organ. The components of the PA system show altered expression patterns in several common malignancies, which have identified them as ideal diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic targets to reduce cancer-associated morbidity and mortality. This review summarizes the various components of the PA system and focuses on the role of uPA-uPAR in different biological processes especially in the context of malignancy. We also discuss the current state of knowledge of uPA-uPAR-targeted diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for various malignancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niaz Mahmood
- Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Catalin Mihalcioiu
- Department of Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Shafaat A. Rabbani
- Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Department of Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kugaevskaya E, Gureeva T, Timoshenko O, Solovyeva N. The urokinase-type plasminogen activator system and its role in tumor progression. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2018; 64:472-486. [DOI: 10.18097/pbmc20186406472] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
In the multistage process of carcinogenesis, the key link in the growth and progression of the tumor is the invasion of malignant cells into normal tissue and their distribution and the degree of destruction of tissues. The most important role in the development of these processes is played by the system of urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA system), which consists of several components: serine proteinase – uPA, its receptor – uPAR and its two endogenous inhibitors – PAI-1 and PAI-2. The components of the uPA system are expressed by cancer cells to a greater extent than normal tissue cells. uPA converts plasminogen into broad spectrum, polyfunctional protease plasmin, which, in addition to the regulation of fibrinolysis, can hydrolyze a number of components of the connective tissue matrix (СTM), as well as activate the zymogens of secreted matrix metalloproteinases (MMР) – pro-MMР. MMРs together can hydrolyze all the main components of the СTM, and thus play a key role in the development of invasive processes, as well as to perform regulatory functions by activating and releasing from STM a number of biologically active molecules that are involved in the regulation of the main processes of carcinogenesis. The uPA system promotes tumor progression not only through the proteolytic cascade, but also through uPAR, PAI-1 and PAI-2, which are involved in both the regulation of uPA/uPAR activity and are involved in proliferation, apoptosis, chemotaxis, adhesion, migration and activation of epithelial-mesenchymal transition pathways. All of the above processes are aimed at regulating invasion, metastasis and angiogenesis. The components of the uPA system are used as prognostic and diagnostic markers of many cancers, as well as serve as targets for anticancer therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - T.A. Gureeva
- Institute of Biomedical Chemistry, Moscow, Russia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Dhindsa DS, Khambhati J, Sandesara PB, Eapen DJ, Quyyumi AA. Biomarkers to Predict Cardiovascular Death. Card Electrophysiol Clin 2017; 9:651-664. [PMID: 29173408 DOI: 10.1016/j.ccep.2017.07.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
This article reviews biomarkers that have been shown to identify subjects at increased risk for cardiovascular death within the general population, in those with established coronary artery disease, and in those with heart failure. Use of biomarkers for risk stratification for sudden cardiac death continues to evolve. It seems that a multimarker strategy for risk stratification using simple measures of circulating proteins and usual clinical risk factors, particularly in patients with known coronary artery disease, can be used to identify patients at near-term risk of death. Whether similar strategies in the general population will prove to be cost-effective needs to be investigated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Devinder S Dhindsa
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, 1462 Clifton Road Northeast, Suite 507, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| | - Jay Khambhati
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, 1462 Clifton Road Northeast, Suite 507, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| | - Pratik B Sandesara
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, 1462 Clifton Road Northeast, Suite 507, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| | - Danny J Eapen
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, 1462 Clifton Road Northeast, Suite 507, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| | - Arshed A Quyyumi
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, 1462 Clifton Road Northeast, Suite 507, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ghasemzedah N, Hayek SS, Ko YA, Eapen DJ, Patel RS, Manocha P, Al Kassem H, Khayata M, Veledar E, Kremastinos D, Thorball CW, Pielak T, Sikora S, Zafari AM, Lerakis S, Sperling L, Vaccarino V, Epstein SE, Quyyumi AA. Pathway-Specific Aggregate Biomarker Risk Score Is Associated With Burden of Coronary Artery Disease and Predicts Near-Term Risk of Myocardial Infarction and Death. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2017; 10:CIRCOUTCOMES.115.001493. [PMID: 28280039 DOI: 10.1161/circoutcomes.115.001493] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2015] [Accepted: 01/11/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Inflammation, coagulation, and cell stress contribute to atherosclerosis and its adverse events. A biomarker risk score (BRS) based on the circulating levels of biomarkers C-reactive protein, fibrin degradation products, and heat shock protein-70 representing these 3 pathways was a strong predictor of future outcomes. We investigated whether soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR), a marker of immune activation, is predictive of outcomes independent of the aforementioned markers and whether its addition to a 3-BRS improves risk reclassification. METHODS AND RESULTS C-reactive protein, fibrin degradation product, heat shock protein-70, and suPAR were measured in 3278 patients undergoing coronary angiography. The BRS was calculated by counting the number of biomarkers above a cutoff determined using the Youden's index. Survival analyses were performed using models adjusted for traditional risk factors. A high suPAR level ≥3.5 ng/mL was associated with all-cause death and myocardial infarction (hazard ratio, 1.83; 95% confidence interval, 1.43-2.35) after adjustment for risk factors, C-reactive protein, fibrin degradation product, and heat shock protein-70. Addition of suPAR to the 3-BRS significantly improved the C statistic, integrated discrimination improvement, and net reclassification index for the primary outcome. A BRS of 1, 2, 3, or 4 was associated with a 1.81-, 2.59-, 6.17-, and 8.80-fold increase, respectively, in the risk of death and myocardial infarction. The 4-BRS was also associated with severity of coronary artery disease and composite end points. CONCLUSIONS SuPAR is independently predictive of adverse outcomes, and its addition to a 3-BRS comprising C-reactive protein, fibrin degradation product, and heat shock protein-70 improved risk reclassification. The clinical utility of using a 4-BRS for risk prediction and management of patients with coronary artery disease warrants further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nima Ghasemzedah
- From the Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA (N.G., S.S.H., D.J.E., R.S.P., P.M., H.A.K., M.K., E.V., A.M.Z., S.L., L.S., V.V., A.A.Q.); Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA (Y.-A.K.); Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, United Kingdom (R.S.P.); Division of Cardiology, Atlanta VA Medical Center, GA (A.M.Z.); Department of Biostatistics, Florida International University, Miami (E.V.); Department of Cardiology, University of Athens School of Medicine, Greece (D.K.); Clinical Research Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark (C.W.T., T.P.); Stemedica Cell Technologies, Inc., San Diego, CA (S.S.); Department of Epidemiology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA (V.V.); and MedStar Heart and Vascular Institute, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC (S.E.E.)
| | - Salim S Hayek
- From the Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA (N.G., S.S.H., D.J.E., R.S.P., P.M., H.A.K., M.K., E.V., A.M.Z., S.L., L.S., V.V., A.A.Q.); Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA (Y.-A.K.); Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, United Kingdom (R.S.P.); Division of Cardiology, Atlanta VA Medical Center, GA (A.M.Z.); Department of Biostatistics, Florida International University, Miami (E.V.); Department of Cardiology, University of Athens School of Medicine, Greece (D.K.); Clinical Research Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark (C.W.T., T.P.); Stemedica Cell Technologies, Inc., San Diego, CA (S.S.); Department of Epidemiology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA (V.V.); and MedStar Heart and Vascular Institute, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC (S.E.E.)
| | - Yi-An Ko
- From the Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA (N.G., S.S.H., D.J.E., R.S.P., P.M., H.A.K., M.K., E.V., A.M.Z., S.L., L.S., V.V., A.A.Q.); Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA (Y.-A.K.); Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, United Kingdom (R.S.P.); Division of Cardiology, Atlanta VA Medical Center, GA (A.M.Z.); Department of Biostatistics, Florida International University, Miami (E.V.); Department of Cardiology, University of Athens School of Medicine, Greece (D.K.); Clinical Research Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark (C.W.T., T.P.); Stemedica Cell Technologies, Inc., San Diego, CA (S.S.); Department of Epidemiology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA (V.V.); and MedStar Heart and Vascular Institute, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC (S.E.E.)
| | - Danny J Eapen
- From the Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA (N.G., S.S.H., D.J.E., R.S.P., P.M., H.A.K., M.K., E.V., A.M.Z., S.L., L.S., V.V., A.A.Q.); Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA (Y.-A.K.); Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, United Kingdom (R.S.P.); Division of Cardiology, Atlanta VA Medical Center, GA (A.M.Z.); Department of Biostatistics, Florida International University, Miami (E.V.); Department of Cardiology, University of Athens School of Medicine, Greece (D.K.); Clinical Research Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark (C.W.T., T.P.); Stemedica Cell Technologies, Inc., San Diego, CA (S.S.); Department of Epidemiology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA (V.V.); and MedStar Heart and Vascular Institute, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC (S.E.E.)
| | - Riyaz S Patel
- From the Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA (N.G., S.S.H., D.J.E., R.S.P., P.M., H.A.K., M.K., E.V., A.M.Z., S.L., L.S., V.V., A.A.Q.); Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA (Y.-A.K.); Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, United Kingdom (R.S.P.); Division of Cardiology, Atlanta VA Medical Center, GA (A.M.Z.); Department of Biostatistics, Florida International University, Miami (E.V.); Department of Cardiology, University of Athens School of Medicine, Greece (D.K.); Clinical Research Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark (C.W.T., T.P.); Stemedica Cell Technologies, Inc., San Diego, CA (S.S.); Department of Epidemiology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA (V.V.); and MedStar Heart and Vascular Institute, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC (S.E.E.)
| | - Pankaj Manocha
- From the Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA (N.G., S.S.H., D.J.E., R.S.P., P.M., H.A.K., M.K., E.V., A.M.Z., S.L., L.S., V.V., A.A.Q.); Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA (Y.-A.K.); Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, United Kingdom (R.S.P.); Division of Cardiology, Atlanta VA Medical Center, GA (A.M.Z.); Department of Biostatistics, Florida International University, Miami (E.V.); Department of Cardiology, University of Athens School of Medicine, Greece (D.K.); Clinical Research Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark (C.W.T., T.P.); Stemedica Cell Technologies, Inc., San Diego, CA (S.S.); Department of Epidemiology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA (V.V.); and MedStar Heart and Vascular Institute, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC (S.E.E.)
| | - Hatem Al Kassem
- From the Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA (N.G., S.S.H., D.J.E., R.S.P., P.M., H.A.K., M.K., E.V., A.M.Z., S.L., L.S., V.V., A.A.Q.); Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA (Y.-A.K.); Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, United Kingdom (R.S.P.); Division of Cardiology, Atlanta VA Medical Center, GA (A.M.Z.); Department of Biostatistics, Florida International University, Miami (E.V.); Department of Cardiology, University of Athens School of Medicine, Greece (D.K.); Clinical Research Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark (C.W.T., T.P.); Stemedica Cell Technologies, Inc., San Diego, CA (S.S.); Department of Epidemiology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA (V.V.); and MedStar Heart and Vascular Institute, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC (S.E.E.)
| | - Mohamed Khayata
- From the Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA (N.G., S.S.H., D.J.E., R.S.P., P.M., H.A.K., M.K., E.V., A.M.Z., S.L., L.S., V.V., A.A.Q.); Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA (Y.-A.K.); Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, United Kingdom (R.S.P.); Division of Cardiology, Atlanta VA Medical Center, GA (A.M.Z.); Department of Biostatistics, Florida International University, Miami (E.V.); Department of Cardiology, University of Athens School of Medicine, Greece (D.K.); Clinical Research Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark (C.W.T., T.P.); Stemedica Cell Technologies, Inc., San Diego, CA (S.S.); Department of Epidemiology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA (V.V.); and MedStar Heart and Vascular Institute, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC (S.E.E.)
| | - Emir Veledar
- From the Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA (N.G., S.S.H., D.J.E., R.S.P., P.M., H.A.K., M.K., E.V., A.M.Z., S.L., L.S., V.V., A.A.Q.); Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA (Y.-A.K.); Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, United Kingdom (R.S.P.); Division of Cardiology, Atlanta VA Medical Center, GA (A.M.Z.); Department of Biostatistics, Florida International University, Miami (E.V.); Department of Cardiology, University of Athens School of Medicine, Greece (D.K.); Clinical Research Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark (C.W.T., T.P.); Stemedica Cell Technologies, Inc., San Diego, CA (S.S.); Department of Epidemiology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA (V.V.); and MedStar Heart and Vascular Institute, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC (S.E.E.)
| | - Dimitrios Kremastinos
- From the Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA (N.G., S.S.H., D.J.E., R.S.P., P.M., H.A.K., M.K., E.V., A.M.Z., S.L., L.S., V.V., A.A.Q.); Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA (Y.-A.K.); Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, United Kingdom (R.S.P.); Division of Cardiology, Atlanta VA Medical Center, GA (A.M.Z.); Department of Biostatistics, Florida International University, Miami (E.V.); Department of Cardiology, University of Athens School of Medicine, Greece (D.K.); Clinical Research Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark (C.W.T., T.P.); Stemedica Cell Technologies, Inc., San Diego, CA (S.S.); Department of Epidemiology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA (V.V.); and MedStar Heart and Vascular Institute, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC (S.E.E.)
| | - Christian W Thorball
- From the Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA (N.G., S.S.H., D.J.E., R.S.P., P.M., H.A.K., M.K., E.V., A.M.Z., S.L., L.S., V.V., A.A.Q.); Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA (Y.-A.K.); Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, United Kingdom (R.S.P.); Division of Cardiology, Atlanta VA Medical Center, GA (A.M.Z.); Department of Biostatistics, Florida International University, Miami (E.V.); Department of Cardiology, University of Athens School of Medicine, Greece (D.K.); Clinical Research Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark (C.W.T., T.P.); Stemedica Cell Technologies, Inc., San Diego, CA (S.S.); Department of Epidemiology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA (V.V.); and MedStar Heart and Vascular Institute, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC (S.E.E.)
| | - Tomasz Pielak
- From the Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA (N.G., S.S.H., D.J.E., R.S.P., P.M., H.A.K., M.K., E.V., A.M.Z., S.L., L.S., V.V., A.A.Q.); Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA (Y.-A.K.); Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, United Kingdom (R.S.P.); Division of Cardiology, Atlanta VA Medical Center, GA (A.M.Z.); Department of Biostatistics, Florida International University, Miami (E.V.); Department of Cardiology, University of Athens School of Medicine, Greece (D.K.); Clinical Research Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark (C.W.T., T.P.); Stemedica Cell Technologies, Inc., San Diego, CA (S.S.); Department of Epidemiology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA (V.V.); and MedStar Heart and Vascular Institute, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC (S.E.E.)
| | - Sergey Sikora
- From the Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA (N.G., S.S.H., D.J.E., R.S.P., P.M., H.A.K., M.K., E.V., A.M.Z., S.L., L.S., V.V., A.A.Q.); Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA (Y.-A.K.); Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, United Kingdom (R.S.P.); Division of Cardiology, Atlanta VA Medical Center, GA (A.M.Z.); Department of Biostatistics, Florida International University, Miami (E.V.); Department of Cardiology, University of Athens School of Medicine, Greece (D.K.); Clinical Research Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark (C.W.T., T.P.); Stemedica Cell Technologies, Inc., San Diego, CA (S.S.); Department of Epidemiology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA (V.V.); and MedStar Heart and Vascular Institute, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC (S.E.E.)
| | - A Maziar Zafari
- From the Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA (N.G., S.S.H., D.J.E., R.S.P., P.M., H.A.K., M.K., E.V., A.M.Z., S.L., L.S., V.V., A.A.Q.); Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA (Y.-A.K.); Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, United Kingdom (R.S.P.); Division of Cardiology, Atlanta VA Medical Center, GA (A.M.Z.); Department of Biostatistics, Florida International University, Miami (E.V.); Department of Cardiology, University of Athens School of Medicine, Greece (D.K.); Clinical Research Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark (C.W.T., T.P.); Stemedica Cell Technologies, Inc., San Diego, CA (S.S.); Department of Epidemiology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA (V.V.); and MedStar Heart and Vascular Institute, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC (S.E.E.)
| | - Stamatios Lerakis
- From the Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA (N.G., S.S.H., D.J.E., R.S.P., P.M., H.A.K., M.K., E.V., A.M.Z., S.L., L.S., V.V., A.A.Q.); Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA (Y.-A.K.); Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, United Kingdom (R.S.P.); Division of Cardiology, Atlanta VA Medical Center, GA (A.M.Z.); Department of Biostatistics, Florida International University, Miami (E.V.); Department of Cardiology, University of Athens School of Medicine, Greece (D.K.); Clinical Research Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark (C.W.T., T.P.); Stemedica Cell Technologies, Inc., San Diego, CA (S.S.); Department of Epidemiology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA (V.V.); and MedStar Heart and Vascular Institute, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC (S.E.E.)
| | - Laurence Sperling
- From the Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA (N.G., S.S.H., D.J.E., R.S.P., P.M., H.A.K., M.K., E.V., A.M.Z., S.L., L.S., V.V., A.A.Q.); Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA (Y.-A.K.); Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, United Kingdom (R.S.P.); Division of Cardiology, Atlanta VA Medical Center, GA (A.M.Z.); Department of Biostatistics, Florida International University, Miami (E.V.); Department of Cardiology, University of Athens School of Medicine, Greece (D.K.); Clinical Research Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark (C.W.T., T.P.); Stemedica Cell Technologies, Inc., San Diego, CA (S.S.); Department of Epidemiology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA (V.V.); and MedStar Heart and Vascular Institute, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC (S.E.E.)
| | - Viola Vaccarino
- From the Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA (N.G., S.S.H., D.J.E., R.S.P., P.M., H.A.K., M.K., E.V., A.M.Z., S.L., L.S., V.V., A.A.Q.); Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA (Y.-A.K.); Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, United Kingdom (R.S.P.); Division of Cardiology, Atlanta VA Medical Center, GA (A.M.Z.); Department of Biostatistics, Florida International University, Miami (E.V.); Department of Cardiology, University of Athens School of Medicine, Greece (D.K.); Clinical Research Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark (C.W.T., T.P.); Stemedica Cell Technologies, Inc., San Diego, CA (S.S.); Department of Epidemiology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA (V.V.); and MedStar Heart and Vascular Institute, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC (S.E.E.)
| | - Stephen E Epstein
- From the Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA (N.G., S.S.H., D.J.E., R.S.P., P.M., H.A.K., M.K., E.V., A.M.Z., S.L., L.S., V.V., A.A.Q.); Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA (Y.-A.K.); Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, United Kingdom (R.S.P.); Division of Cardiology, Atlanta VA Medical Center, GA (A.M.Z.); Department of Biostatistics, Florida International University, Miami (E.V.); Department of Cardiology, University of Athens School of Medicine, Greece (D.K.); Clinical Research Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark (C.W.T., T.P.); Stemedica Cell Technologies, Inc., San Diego, CA (S.S.); Department of Epidemiology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA (V.V.); and MedStar Heart and Vascular Institute, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC (S.E.E.)
| | - Arshed A Quyyumi
- From the Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA (N.G., S.S.H., D.J.E., R.S.P., P.M., H.A.K., M.K., E.V., A.M.Z., S.L., L.S., V.V., A.A.Q.); Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA (Y.-A.K.); Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, United Kingdom (R.S.P.); Division of Cardiology, Atlanta VA Medical Center, GA (A.M.Z.); Department of Biostatistics, Florida International University, Miami (E.V.); Department of Cardiology, University of Athens School of Medicine, Greece (D.K.); Clinical Research Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark (C.W.T., T.P.); Stemedica Cell Technologies, Inc., San Diego, CA (S.S.); Department of Epidemiology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA (V.V.); and MedStar Heart and Vascular Institute, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC (S.E.E.).
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kristensen G, Berg KD, Lippert S, Christensen IJ, Brasso K, Høyer-Hansen G, Røder MA. Plasma levels of intact and cleaved urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) in men with clinically localised prostate cancer. J Clin Pathol 2017; 70:1063-1068. [PMID: 28607123 DOI: 10.1136/jclinpath-2017-204475] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2017] [Revised: 04/25/2017] [Accepted: 04/25/2017] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
AIMS Lymph node metastasis (N1) is an adverse prognostic factor for men with clinically localised prostate cancer (PCa), but the prediction of N1 disease remains difficult. Urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) plays an important role in angiogenesis and tumorigenesis. We analysed whether plasma levels of the soluble uPAR forms uPAR(I-III), uPAR(II-III) and uPAR(I) were associated with the risk of N1 disease in men with clinically localised PCa. METHODS The present study includes all men (n=518) who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) for clinically localised PCa, 29 of whom had N1 disease. Soluble uPAR forms were measured using three time-resolved fluorescence immunoassays. The prognostic value of the different uPAR forms together with clinicopathological parameters for N1 disease were analysed using logistic regression, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) regression analysis and quantified using the areas under the ROC curve (AUC). RESULTS All soluble uPAR levels were significantly (p=0.03) higher in patients with N1 disease compared with patients with N0/x disease. ROC curves including clinical tumour stage, biopsy Gleason score, prostate-specific antigen and percent positive biopsies had an AUC of 87.7% for prediction of N1 disease. With the addition of uPAR(I) to the model, the AUC increased to 88.4%. CONCLUSIONS Addition of uPAR(I) level to known diagnostic parameters did not increase the prediction of N1 disease following RP in men with clinically localised PCa. Our results indicate that the plasma levels at diagnosis of the different uPAR forms do not hold important predictive or prognostic information in men with clinically localised PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gitte Kristensen
- Department of Urology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen Prostate Cancer Center, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Kasper Drimer Berg
- Department of Urology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen Prostate Cancer Center, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Solvej Lippert
- Department of Urology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen Prostate Cancer Center, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ib Jarle Christensen
- Biotech Research and Innovation Centre (BRIC), University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Gastroenterology, Hvidovre Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - Klaus Brasso
- Department of Urology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen Prostate Cancer Center, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Gunilla Høyer-Hansen
- Biotech Research and Innovation Centre (BRIC), University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.,The Finsen Laboratory, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Martin Andreas Røder
- Department of Urology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen Prostate Cancer Center, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Guo H, Zhou LX, Ma H, Liu B, Cheng J, Ma YY, Zhao L. Soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor and urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor contribute to chemoresistance in leukemia. Oncol Lett 2017; 14:383-389. [PMID: 28693180 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2017.6150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2015] [Accepted: 02/23/2017] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
The soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) and the urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) have been proposed as useful biomarkers of tumor progression. Recently, suPAR was associated with chemoresistance in lung cancer. However, its clinical significance in leukemia has not previously been investigated. The present study examined the plasma levels of suPAR and the expression of the uPAR on bone marrow (BM) cells in 86 patients with leukemia at diagnosis prior to chemotherapy and 26 normal subjects (control group). The plasma suPAR levels were measured using ELISA, whilst uPAR expression was assayed by flow cytometry analysis. In addition, cell surface uPAR expression on K562 and multidrug-resistant K562/ADM cell lines was studied by western blotting. On admission and follow-up, the levels of suPAR in patients with leukemia were significantly increased compared with controls. Systemic levels of suPAR were strongly associated with the numbers of white blood cells. A case was defined as uPAR-positive (uPAR+) if >20% of the gated cells expressed uPAR. In comparison with 26 healthy BM samples that were negative for uPAR expression, 48 (55.8%) of the 86 leukemia patients were uPAR+. uPAR expression on the cell surface of multidrug-resistant K562/ADM cells was increased compared with that on K562 cells. In conclusion, plasma suPAR expression may be a useful marker for subtype classification of patients with leukemia and cell surface uPAR may be associated with resistance to chemotherapy or disease progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hong Guo
- Critical Care Medicine Department, The First Affiliated Hospital, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, P.R. China
| | - Lan-Xia Zhou
- Central Laboratory, The First Affiliated Hospital, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, P.R. China
| | - Haizhen Ma
- Department of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, P.R. China
| | - Bei Liu
- Department of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, P.R. China
| | - Juan Cheng
- Department of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, P.R. China
| | - Yun-Yun Ma
- Central Laboratory, The First Affiliated Hospital, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, P.R. China
| | - Li Zhao
- Central Laboratory, The First Affiliated Hospital, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Skovgaard D, Persson M, Kjaer A. Imaging of Prostate Cancer Using Urokinase-Type Plasminogen Activator Receptor PET. PET Clin 2017; 12:243-255. [PMID: 28267457 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpet.2016.12.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) overexpression is an important biomarker for aggressiveness in cancer including prostate cancer (PC) and provides independent clinical information in addition to prostate-specific antigen and Gleason score. This article focuses on uPAR PET as a new diagnostic and prognostic imaging biomarker in PC. Many preclinical uPAR-targeted PET imaging studies using AE105 in cancer models have been undertaken with promising results. A major breakthrough was obtained with the recent human translation of uPAR PET in using 64Cu- and 68Ga-labelled versions of AE105, respectively. Clinical results from patients with PC included in these studies are encouraging and support continuation with large-scale clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dorthe Skovgaard
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine & PET and Cluster for Molecular Imaging, Rigshospitalet and University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 9, 4011, Copenhagen, DK-2100, Denmark
| | - Morten Persson
- Curasight Aps, Ole Maaloesvej 3, Copenhagen, DK-2200, Denmark
| | - Andreas Kjaer
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine & PET and Cluster for Molecular Imaging, Rigshospitalet and University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 9, 4011, Copenhagen, DK-2100, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Wang S, Jiang L, Han Y, Chew SH, Ohara Y, Akatsuka S, Weng L, Kawaguchi K, Fukui T, Sekido Y, Yokoi K, Toyokuni S. Urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor promotes proliferation and invasion with reduced cisplatin sensitivity in malignant mesothelioma. Oncotarget 2016; 7:69565-69578. [PMID: 27602956 PMCID: PMC5342498 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.11829] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2016] [Accepted: 08/25/2016] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Malignant mesothelioma (MM) is a rare neoplasm associated with asbestos exposure. The prognosis of MM is poor because it is aggressive and highly resistant to chemotherapy. Using a rat model of asbestos-induced MM, we found elevated urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR; Plaur) expression in rat tissues, which was associated with poor prognosis. The proliferation, migration and invasion of MM cells were suppressed by uPAR knockdown and increased by overexpression experiments, irrespective of urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA; Plau) levels. More importantly, we found that uPAR expression is associated with sensitivity to cisplatin in MM through the PI3K/AKT pathway, which was demonstrated with specific inhibitors, LY294002 and Akti-1/2. uPAR knockdown significantly increased sensitivity to cisplatin whereas its overexpression significantly decreased cisplatin sensitivity. Furthermore, sera and tissues from MM patients showed significantly high uPAR levels, which suggested the pathogenic role of uPAR in the tumor biology of human MM. In conclusion, our findings indicate that uPAR levels are associated with malignant characteristics and cisplatin sensitivity of MM. In addition to the potential use of uPAR as a prognostic marker, the combination of uPAR abrogation and cisplatin may reveal a promising therapeutic approach for MM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shenqi Wang
- Department of Pathology and Biological Responses, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, 466–8550, Japan
| | - Li Jiang
- Department of Pathology and Biological Responses, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, 466–8550, Japan
| | - Yipeng Han
- Department of Tumor Pathology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, 466–8550, Japan
| | - Shan Hwu Chew
- Department of Pathology and Biological Responses, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, 466–8550, Japan
| | - Yuuki Ohara
- Department of Pathology and Biological Responses, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, 466–8550, Japan
| | - Shinya Akatsuka
- Department of Pathology and Biological Responses, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, 466–8550, Japan
| | - Liang Weng
- Department of Tumor Pathology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, 466–8550, Japan
| | - Koji Kawaguchi
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, 466–8550, Japan
| | - Takayuki Fukui
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, 466–8550, Japan
| | - Yoshitaka Sekido
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, 466–8550, Japan
- Division of Molecular Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Research Institute, Nagoya, 464–8681, Japan
| | - Kohei Yokoi
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, 466–8550, Japan
| | - Shinya Toyokuni
- Department of Pathology and Biological Responses, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, 466–8550, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Skovgaard D, Persson M, Kjaer A. PET imaging of urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) in prostate cancer: current status and future perspectives. Clin Transl Imaging 2016; 4:457-465. [PMID: 27933281 PMCID: PMC5118403 DOI: 10.1007/s40336-016-0197-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2016] [Accepted: 06/25/2016] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Overexpression of urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptors (uPAR) represents an important biomarker for aggressiveness in most common malignant diseases, including prostate cancer (PC). Accordingly, uPAR expression either assessed directly in malignant PC tissue or assessed directly in plasma (intact/cleaved forms)—provides independent additional clinical information to that contributed by PSA, Gleason score, and other relevant pathological and clinical parameters. In this respect, non-invasive molecular imaging by positron emission tomography (PET) offers a very attractive technology platform, which can provide the required quantitative information on the uPAR expression profile, without the need for invasive procedures and the risk of missing the target due to tumor heterogeneity. These observations support non-invasive PET imaging of uPAR in PC as a clinically relevant diagnostic and prognostic imaging method. In this review, we will focus on the recent development of uPAR PET and the relevance within prostate cancer imaging. Novel antibody and small-molecule radiotracers-targeting uPAR, including a series of uPAR-targeting PET ligands, based on the high affinity peptide ligand AE105, have been synthesized and tested in vitro and in vivo in preclinical murine xenograft models and, recently, in a first-ever clinical uPAR PET study in cancer patients, including patients with PC. In this phase I study, a high and specific uptake of the tracer 64Cu-DOTA-AE105 was found in both primary tumors and lymph node metastases. The results are encouraging and support large-scale clinical trials to determine the utility of uPAR PET in the management of patients with PC with the goal of improving outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dorthe Skovgaard
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine & PET and Cluster for Molecular Imaging, Rigshospitalet and University of Copenhagen, National University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Andreas Kjaer
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine & PET and Cluster for Molecular Imaging, Rigshospitalet and University of Copenhagen, National University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Lippert S, Berg KD, Høyer-Hansen G, Lund IK, Iversen P, Christensen IJ, Brasso K, Røder MA. Copenhagen uPAR prostate cancer (CuPCa) database: protocol and early results. Biomark Med 2016; 10:209-16. [PMID: 26764285 DOI: 10.2217/bmm.15.114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM Urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) plays a central role during cancer invasion by facilitating pericellular proteolysis. We initiated the prospective 'Copenhagen uPAR Prostate Cancer' study to investigate the significance of uPAR levels in prostate cancer (PCa) patients. METHODS Plasma samples and clinical data from patients with newly diagnosed PCa have been collected prospectively. The uPAR forms have been measured in plasma using time-resolved fluorescence immunoassays. RESULTS The level of intact uPAR(I-III) did not differ. Plasma uPAR(I-III) + uPAR(II-III) levels and uPAR(I) levels were significantly higher in hormone-naive and castrate-resistant patients compared with patients with localized disease (both: p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION Our results show that cleaved uPAR forms are significantly increased in patients with advanced PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Solvej Lippert
- Copenhagen Prostate Cancer Center, Department of Urology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Kasper D Berg
- Copenhagen Prostate Cancer Center, Department of Urology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Gunilla Høyer-Hansen
- The Finsen Laboratory, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Biotech Research & Innovation Centre (BRIC), University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ida K Lund
- The Finsen Laboratory, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Biotech Research & Innovation Centre (BRIC), University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Peter Iversen
- Copenhagen Prostate Cancer Center, Department of Urology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ib J Christensen
- The Finsen Laboratory, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Biotech Research & Innovation Centre (BRIC), University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Klaus Brasso
- Copenhagen Prostate Cancer Center, Department of Urology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Martin A Røder
- Copenhagen Prostate Cancer Center, Department of Urology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Hodges GW, Bang CN, Wachtell K, Eugen-Olsen J, Jeppesen JL. suPAR: A New Biomarker for Cardiovascular Disease? Can J Cardiol 2015; 31:1293-302. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2015.03.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2014] [Revised: 03/20/2015] [Accepted: 03/20/2015] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
|
17
|
Eapen DJ, Manocha P, Ghasemzadeh N, Patel RS, Al Kassem H, Hammadah M, Veledar E, Le NA, Pielak T, Thorball CW, Velegraki A, Kremastinos DT, Lerakis S, Sperling L, Quyyumi AA. Soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor level is an independent predictor of the presence and severity of coronary artery disease and of future adverse events. J Am Heart Assoc 2014; 3:e001118. [PMID: 25341887 PMCID: PMC4323820 DOI: 10.1161/jaha.114.001118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 103] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Introduction Soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) is an emerging inflammatory and immune biomarker. Whether suPAR level predicts the presence and the severity of coronary artery disease (CAD), and of incident death and myocardial infarction (MI) in subjects with suspected CAD, is unknown. Methods and Results We measured plasma suPAR levels in 3367 subjects (67% with CAD) recruited in the Emory Cardiovascular Biobank and followed them for adverse cardiovascular (CV) outcomes of death and MI over a mean 2.1±1.1 years. Presence of angiographic CAD (≥50% stenosis in ≥1 coronary artery) and its severity were quantitated using the Gensini score. Cox's proportional hazard survival and discrimination analyses were performed with models adjusted for established CV risk factors and C‐reactive protein levels. Elevated suPAR levels were independently associated with the presence of CAD (P<0.0001) and its severity (P<0.0001). A plasma suPAR level ≥3.5 ng/mL (cutoff by Youden's index) predicted future risk of MI (hazard ratio [HR]=3.2; P<0.0001), cardiac death (HR=2.62; P<0.0001), and the combined endpoint of death and MI (HR=1.9; P<0.0001), even after adjustment of covariates. The C‐statistic for a model based on traditional risk factors was improved from 0.72 to 0.74 (P=0.008) with the addition of suPAR. Conclusion Elevated levels of plasma suPAR are associated with the presence and severity of CAD and are independent predictors of death and MI in patients with suspected or known CAD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danny J Eapen
- Emory Clinical Cardiovascular Research Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA (D.J.E., P.M., N.G., R.S.P., H.A.K., M.H., E.V., N.A.L., S.L., L.S., A.A.Q.)
| | - Pankaj Manocha
- Emory Clinical Cardiovascular Research Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA (D.J.E., P.M., N.G., R.S.P., H.A.K., M.H., E.V., N.A.L., S.L., L.S., A.A.Q.)
| | - Nima Ghasemzadeh
- Emory Clinical Cardiovascular Research Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA (D.J.E., P.M., N.G., R.S.P., H.A.K., M.H., E.V., N.A.L., S.L., L.S., A.A.Q.)
| | - Riyaz S Patel
- Emory Clinical Cardiovascular Research Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA (D.J.E., P.M., N.G., R.S.P., H.A.K., M.H., E.V., N.A.L., S.L., L.S., A.A.Q.) Department of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK (R.S.P.)
| | - Hatem Al Kassem
- Emory Clinical Cardiovascular Research Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA (D.J.E., P.M., N.G., R.S.P., H.A.K., M.H., E.V., N.A.L., S.L., L.S., A.A.Q.)
| | - Muhammad Hammadah
- Emory Clinical Cardiovascular Research Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA (D.J.E., P.M., N.G., R.S.P., H.A.K., M.H., E.V., N.A.L., S.L., L.S., A.A.Q.)
| | - Emir Veledar
- Emory Clinical Cardiovascular Research Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA (D.J.E., P.M., N.G., R.S.P., H.A.K., M.H., E.V., N.A.L., S.L., L.S., A.A.Q.)
| | - Ngoc-Anh Le
- Emory Clinical Cardiovascular Research Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA (D.J.E., P.M., N.G., R.S.P., H.A.K., M.H., E.V., N.A.L., S.L., L.S., A.A.Q.)
| | - Tomasz Pielak
- Clinical Research Center, Copenhagen University Hospital Copenhagen, Denmark (T.P., C.W.T.)
| | - Christian W Thorball
- Clinical Research Center, Copenhagen University Hospital Copenhagen, Denmark (T.P., C.W.T.)
| | | | | | - Stamatios Lerakis
- Emory Clinical Cardiovascular Research Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA (D.J.E., P.M., N.G., R.S.P., H.A.K., M.H., E.V., N.A.L., S.L., L.S., A.A.Q.) Medical School of Athens, Athens, Greece (A.V., D.T.K., S.L.)
| | - Laurence Sperling
- Emory Clinical Cardiovascular Research Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA (D.J.E., P.M., N.G., R.S.P., H.A.K., M.H., E.V., N.A.L., S.L., L.S., A.A.Q.)
| | - Arshed A Quyyumi
- Emory Clinical Cardiovascular Research Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA (D.J.E., P.M., N.G., R.S.P., H.A.K., M.H., E.V., N.A.L., S.L., L.S., A.A.Q.)
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Persson M, Juhl K, Rasmussen P, Brandt-Larsen M, Madsen J, Ploug M, Kjaer A. uPAR targeted radionuclide therapy with (177)Lu-DOTA-AE105 inhibits dissemination of metastatic prostate cancer. Mol Pharm 2014; 11:2796-806. [PMID: 24955765 DOI: 10.1021/mp500177c] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
The urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) is implicated in cancer invasion and metastatic development in prostate cancer and provides therefore an attractive molecular target for both imaging and therapy. In this study, we provide the first in vivo data on an antimetastatic effect of uPAR radionuclide targeted therapy in such lesions and show the potential of uPAR positron emission tomography (PET) imaging for identifying small foci of metastatic cells in a mouse model of disseminating human prostate cancer. Two radiolabeled ligands were generated in high purity and specific activity: a uPAR-targeting probe ((177)Lu-DOTA-AE105) and a nonbinding control ((177)Lu-DOTA-AE105mut). Both uPAR flow cytometry and ELISA confirmed high expression levels of the target uPAR in PC-3M-LUC2.luc cells, and cell binding studies using (177)Lu-DOTA-AE105 resulted in a specific binding with an IC50 value of 100 nM in a competitive binding experiment. In vivo, uPAR targeted radionuclide therapy significantly reduced the number of metastatic lesions in the disseminated metastatic prostate cancer model, when compared to vehicle and nontargeted (177)Lu groups (p < 0.05) using bioluminescence imaging. Moreover, we found a significantly longer metastatic-free survival, with 65% of all mice without any disseminated metastatic lesions present at 65 days after first treatment dose (p = 0.047). In contrast, only 30% of all mice in the combined control groups treated with (177)Lu-DOTA-AE105mut or vehicle were without metastatic lesions. No treatment-induced toxicity was observed during the study as evaluated by observing animal weight and H&E staining of kidney tissue (dose-limiting organ). Finally, uPAR PET imaging using (64)Cu-DOTA-AE105 detected all small, disseminated metastatic foci when compared with bioluminescence imaging in a cohort of animals during the treatment study. In conclusion, uPAR targeted radiotherapy resulted in a significant reduction in the number of metastatic lesions in a human metastatic prostate cancer model. Furthermore, we have provided the first evidence of the potential for identification of small metastatic lesions using uPAR PET imaging in disseminated prostate cancer, illustrating the promising strategy of uPAR theranostics in prostate cancer.
Collapse
|
19
|
Boonstra MC, Verbeek FPR, Mazar AP, Prevoo HAJM, Kuppen PJK, van de Velde CJH, Vahrmeijer AL, Sier CFM. Expression of uPAR in tumor-associated stromal cells is associated with colorectal cancer patient prognosis: a TMA study. BMC Cancer 2014; 14:269. [PMID: 24742002 PMCID: PMC3997436 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-269] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2013] [Accepted: 04/03/2014] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The receptor for urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPAR) is associated with cancer development and progression. Within the tumor microenvironment uPAR is expressed by malignant cells as well as tumor-associated stromal cells. However, the contribution of uPAR expression in these stromal cells to malignancy and patient survival in colorectal cancer is still unclear. This study compares the association of uPAR expression in both colorectal tumor-associated stromal cells and neoplastic cells with clinico-pathological characteristics and patient survival using tissue micro arrays (TMA). Methods Immunohistochemical staining of uPAR expression was performed on tumor tissue from 262 colorectal cancer patients. Kaplan-Meier, log rank, and uni- and multivariate Cox’s regression analyses were used to calculate associations between uPAR expression and patient survival. Results In the colorectal tumor-associated stromal microenvironment, uPAR is expressed in macrophages, (neoangiogenic) endothelial cells and myofibroblasts. uPAR expression in tumor-associated stromal cells and neoplastic cells (and both combined) were negatively associated with overall survival (OS) and Disease Free Survival (DFS). Uni- and multivariate Cox’s regression analysis for combined uPAR expression in tumor-associated stromal and neoplastic cells showed significant and independent negative associations with OS and DFS. Only uPAR expression in tumor-associated stromal cells showed independent significance in the uni- and multivariate analysis for DFS. Conclusion This study demonstrates a significant independent negative association between colorectal cancer patient survival and uPAR expression in especially tumor-associated stromal cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Cornelis F M Sier
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Mekkawy AH, Pourgholami MH, Morris DL. Involvement of urokinase-type plasminogen activator system in cancer: an overview. Med Res Rev 2014; 34:918-56. [PMID: 24549574 DOI: 10.1002/med.21308] [Citation(s) in RCA: 97] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Currently, there are several studies supporting the role of urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) system in cancer. The association of uPA to its receptor triggers the conversion of plasminogen into plasmin. This process is regulated by the uPA inhibitors (PAI-1 and PAI-2). Plasmin promotes degradation of basement membrane and extracellular matrix (ECM) components as well as activation of ECM latent matrix metalloproteases. Degradation and remodeling of the surrounding tissues is crucial in the early steps of tumor progression by facilitating expansion of the tumor mass, release of tumor growth factors, activation of cytokines as well as induction of tumor cell proliferation, migration, and invasion. Hence, many tumors showed a correlation between uPA system component levels and tumor aggressiveness and survival. Therefore, this review summarizes the structure of the uPA system, its contribution to cancer progression, and the clinical relevance of uPA family members in cancer diagnosis. In addition, the review evaluates the significance of uPA system in the development of cancer-targeted therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmed H Mekkawy
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Research Laboratories, St. George Hospital, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2217, Australia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Romero Otero J, Garcia Gomez B, Campos Juanatey F, Touijer KA. Prostate cancer biomarkers: an update. Urol Oncol 2014; 32:252-60. [PMID: 24495450 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2013.09.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2013] [Revised: 09/13/2013] [Accepted: 09/17/2013] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Many aspects of prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment could be greatly advanced with new, effective biomarkers. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) has multiple weaknesses as a biomarker, such as not distinguishing well between cancer and benign prostatic hyperplasia or between indolent and aggressive cancers, thus leading to overtreatment, especially unnecessary biopsies. PSA also often fails to indicate accurately which patients are responding to a given treatment. Yet PSA is the only prostate cancer biomarker routinely used by urologists. Here, we provide updated information on the most relevant of the other biomarkers currently in use or in development for prostate cancer. Recent research shows improvement over using PSA alone by comparing total PSA (tPSA) or free PSA (fPSA) with new, related markers, such as prostate cancer antigen (PCA) 3, the individual molecular forms of PSA (proPSA, benign PSA, and intact PSA), and kallikreins other than PSA. Promising results have also been seen with the use of the fusion gene TMPRSS2:ERG and with various forms of the urokinase plasminogen activation receptor. Initially, there were high hopes for early PCA, but those data were not reproducible and thus research on early PCA has been abandoned. Much work remains to be done before any of these biomarkers are fully validated and accepted. Currently, the only markers discussed in this paper with Food and Drug Administration-approved tests are PCA 3 and an isoform of proPSA, [-2]proPSA. Assays are in development for most of the other biomarkers described in this paper. While the biomarker validation process can be long and filled with obstacles, the rewards will be great-in terms of both patient care and costs to the health care system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Felix Campos Juanatey
- Hospital Universitario 12 Octubre, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Universitario Marques De Valdecilla, Santander, Spain
| | - Karim A Touijer
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Department of Urology, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
|
23
|
Lyngbæk S, Marott JL, Sehestedt T, Hansen TW, Olsen MH, Andersen O, Linneberg A, Haugaard SB, Eugen-Olsen J, Hansen PR, Jeppesen J. Cardiovascular risk prediction in the general population with use of suPAR, CRP, and Framingham Risk Score. Int J Cardiol 2013; 167:2904-11. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.07.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 104] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2012] [Revised: 06/19/2012] [Accepted: 07/21/2012] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
|
24
|
Fidan E, Mentese A, Ozdemir F, Deger O, Kavgaci H, Caner Karahan S, Aydin F. Diagnostic and prognostic significance of CA IX and suPAR in gastric cancer. Med Oncol 2013; 30:540. [PMID: 23512428 DOI: 10.1007/s12032-013-0540-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2013] [Accepted: 03/07/2013] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
This study was intended to evaluate the prognostic and diagnostic significance of carbonic anhydrase IX (CA IX) and soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) levels in gastric cancer patients. CA IX and suPAR were analyzed from serum and plasma samples of gastric cancer patients. Fifty patients and 34 controls were enrolled. CA IX and suPAR levels were statistically significantly higher in the patient group (patient; 182.5 ± 212.4, control; 47.3 ± 32, P = 0.0001 and patient; 5.74 ± 5.3, control; 2.27 ± 0.77, P = 0.0001, respectively). CA IX and suPAR levels were higher in metastatic subjects (metastatic; 227.1 ± 273.5, non-metastatic; 147.4 ± 144.1, P > 0.05). Prognosis was worse in the patient group with elevated suPAR. CA IX and especially suPAR are correlated with the presence and stage of the disease. High suPAR levels indicate a poorer prognosis in gastric cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evren Fidan
- Division of Medical Oncology, Konya Training and Research Hospital, 42100 Konya, Turkey.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Usefulness of soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor to predict repeat myocardial infarction and mortality in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous intervention. Am J Cardiol 2012; 110:1756-63. [PMID: 22981263 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.08.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2012] [Revised: 08/01/2012] [Accepted: 08/01/2012] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
The plasma level of the inflammatory biomarker soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) is an independent predictor of cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality in healthy subjects. The prognostic capability of suPAR, its temporal course, and its relation to plasma C-reactive protein (CRP) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous intervention (PCI) is unknown. Therefore, the plasma suPAR and CRP levels were measured in 296 consecutive patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction admitted for primary PCI at baseline and every 6 to 8 hours thereafter until the cardiac biomarker levels had peaked. The end points were all-cause mortality and fatal or nonfatal recurrent myocardial infarction (MI). During a median follow-up period of 5.75 years, 69 deaths and 48 nonfatal and 14 fatal recurrent MIs occurred. All-cause mortality increased significantly from 8.1% to 41.5% across increasing quartiles of suPAR levels at the end of follow-up (log-rank p <0.0001). After adjustment for other independent prognostic factors, a highly significant increase was seen in all-cause mortality (hazard ratio 1.45, 95% confidence interval, 1.19 to 1.76; p <0.001) and recurrent MI (hazard ratio 1.53, 95% confidence interval 1.16 to 2.01; p <0.01) for each standard deviation increment of suPAR levels). In contrast to plasma CRP, the suPAR levels remained stable after primary PCI. Furthermore, CRP did not predict mortality or reinfarction after adjustment for age and gender (p = 0.34). In conclusion, suPAR is a stable plasma biomarker after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary PCI that predicts all-cause mortality and recurrent MI.
Collapse
|
26
|
Edsfeldt A, Nitulescu M, Grufman H, Grönberg C, Persson A, Nilsson M, Persson M, Björkbacka H, Gonçalves I. Soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor is associated with inflammation in the vulnerable human atherosclerotic plaque. Stroke 2012; 43:3305-12. [PMID: 23150653 DOI: 10.1161/strokeaha.112.664094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Recently, plasma soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) has gained interest as a marker of cardiovascular risk. suPAR is released through the cleavage of urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR), which is found in monocytes, activated T-lymphocytes and endothelial cells, all involved in atherosclerosis. suPAR levels have been well studied in plasma, but no studies have focused on suPAR in human atherosclerotic plaques. The aim of this study was to determine whether suPAR measured in the plaque is associated with symptomatic plaques and plaque inflammation. METHODS Plasma and carotid plaques from 162 patients were analyzed. Lipids, collagen, uPAR, and macrophages were measured histologically. Cytokines and suPAR were measured in homogenized plaque extracts using multiplex immunoassay and ELISA, respectively. Plasma levels of suPAR were analysed with ELISA. CD3, CD4, as well as uPAR mRNA expression were assessed with quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction in plaque homogenates from 123 patients. RESULTS Plaque and plasma suPAR levels were higher in symptomatic patients compared with asymptomatic patients. Plaque suPAR levels correlated with plaque content of lipids and macrophages and with proinflammatory chemokines and cytokines monocyte chemoattractant protein 1, tumor necrosis factor α, interleukin 1β, interleukin 6, platelet-derived growth factor AB/BB, monocyte inflammatory protein 1β, regulated on activation normal T-cell expressed and secreted, and s-CD40L. uPAR mRNA and histological staining for uPAR correlated with plaque content of suPAR. CONCLUSIONS This study shows that suPAR in human carotid plaques and plasma is associated with the presence of symptoms and that plaque suPAR is associated with the vulnerable inflammatory plaque. These findings strengthen the hypothesis of suPAR as a future marker of vulnerable atherosclerotic plaques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Edsfeldt
- Experimental Cardiovascular Research Unit, Clinical Research Center, Department of Clinical Sciences, Jan Waldenströms gata 35, CRC 91:12, Lund University, and the Clinical Research Unit, Acute Medical Center, Skåne University Hospital, SE-20502 Malmö, Sweden.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|