Reflex responses to periodontal and auditory stimulation in human masseter

Reflex responses of human masseter motor units to mechanical stimulation of the teeth

Our aim was to investigate the jaw reflexes using both the probability- and the discharge rate-based analysis methods. Twelve consenting volunteer subjects participated in this study. Subjects bit gently on bite bars that carried the impression of their teeth. Surface and intramuscular electrical activity of the masseter was recorded. With the help of audio feedback from one motor unit, each subject bit to discharge the unit at a fixed rate. While the subject continuously activated the selected motor unit, 4-N stimuli were delivered to the upper right central incisor either at a rapid or a slow rate. For each trial, ≥300 stimuli were delivered, and, once a trial was completed, local anesthetic block was applied around the stimulated tooth, and the experiment was repeated. While preceding local anesthesia, the rapid-rate stimuli ("tap") induced substantial inhibitory reflex responses; during local anesthetic block, the same stimulus induced excitatory and inhibitory reflex responses. Slow-rate stimuli ("push"), on the other hand, usually generated a combination of inhibitory and excitatory responses that disappeared completely during the local anesthetic block. This study discovered that the strength of the inhibitory reflex response to a tooth-tap stimulus was much larger than previously reported. This study also found that whereas the probability-based analyses were better for illustrating the existence and latency of small earlier responses, the discharge rate-based method was better for indicating the duration of earlier responses and the existence, sign, and duration of later responses.

Reflex control of human jaw muscles

The aim of this review is to discuss what is known about the reflex control of the human masticatory system and to propose a method for standardized investigation. Literature regarding the current knowledge of activation of jaw muscles, receptors involved in the feedback control, and reflex pathways is discussed. The reflexes are discussed under the headings of the stimulation conditions. This was deliberately done to remind the reader that under each stimulation condition, several receptor systems are activated, and that it is not yet possible to stimulate only one afferent system in isolation in human mastication experiments. To achieve a method for uniform investigation, we need to set a method for stimulation of the afferent pathway under study with minimal simultaneous activation of other receptor systems. This stimulation should also be done in an efficient and reproducible way. To substantiate our conviction to standardize the stimulus type and parameters, we discuss the advantages and disadvantages of mechanical and electrical stimuli. For mechanical stimulus to be delivered in a reproducible way, the following precautions are suggested: The stimulus delivery system (often a probe attached to a vibrator) should be brought into secure contact with the area of stimulation. To minimize the slack between the probe, the area to be stimulated should be taken up by the application of pre-load, and the delivered force should be recorded in series. Electrical stimulus has advantages in that it can be delivered in a reproducible way, though its physiological relevance can be questioned. It is also necessary to standardize the method for recording and analyzing the responses of the motoneurons to the stimulation. For that, a new technique is introduced, and its advantages over the currently used methods are discussed. The new method can illustrate the synaptic potential that is induced in the motoneurons without the errors that are unavoidable in the current techniques. We believe that once stimulation, recording, and analysis methods are standardized, it will be possible to bring out the real "wiring diagram" that operates in conscious human subjects.

Responses of single motor units in human masseter to transcranial magnetic stimulation of either hemisphere

The corticobulbar inputs to single masseter motoneurons from the contra- and ipsilateral motor cortex were examined using focal transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) with a figure-of-eight stimulating coil. Fine-wire electrodes were inserted into the masseter muscle of six subjects, and the responses of 30 motor units were examined. All were tested with contralateral TMS, and 87 % showed a short-latency excitation in the peristimulus time histogram at 7.0 +/- 0.3 ms. The response was a single peak of 1.5 +/- 0.2 ms duration, consistent with monosynaptic excitation via a single D- or I1-wave volley elicited by the stimulus. Increased TMS intensity produced a higher response probability (n = 13, paired t test, P < 0.05) but did not affect response latency. Of the remaining motor units tested with contralateral TMS, 7 % did not respond at intensities tested, and 7 % had reduced firing probability without any preceding excitation. Sixteen of these motor units were also tested with ipsilateral TMS and four (25 %) showed short-latency excitation at 6.7 +/- 0.6 ms, with a duration of 1.5 +/- 0.3 ms. Latency and duration of excitatory peaks for these four motor units did not differ significantly with ipsilateral vs. contralateral TMS (paired t tests, P > 0.05). Of the motor units tested with ipsilateral TMS, 56 % responded with a reduced firing probability without a preceding excitation, and 19 % did not respond. These data suggest that masseter motoneurons receive monosynaptic input from the motor cortex that is asymmetrical from each hemisphere, with most low threshold motoneurons receiving short-latency excitatory input from the contralateral hemisphere only.

Response of human jaw muscles to axial stimulation of the incisor

The role of periodontal mechanoreceptors (PMRs) in the reflex control of the jaw muscles has thus far been mainly derived from animal studies. To date, the work that has been done on humans has been limited and confined to orthogonal stimulation of the labial surface of the tooth. The purpose of this study was to investigate the response of the masseter and digastric muscles in humans to controlled axial stimulation of the upper left central incisor, both before and during a local anaesthetic block of the PMRs. Ten neurologically normal young adult females were tested, each on two separate occasions to confirm the reproducibility of the results. It was found that the reflex response in the masseter was modulated by the rate of rise of the stimulus used and, to a lesser degree, the level of background muscle activity. There was little detectable change in the activity of the digastric muscle under the tested conditions and what was found could be attributed to cross-talk with the masseter. The reflex responses obtained were significantly different between subjects; however retesting the same subject on a different occasion yielded similar results. The results indicate that the most common response of the masseter muscle to brisk axial stimulation of the incisor is a reflex inhibition at 20 ms, followed by a late excitation at 44 ms. However, it is possible that this late excitation could be due to delayed action potentials and hence be artefactual. As the application of a local anaesthetic block removed or significantly reduced both of these responses, it was concluded that they originated from the PMRs. Unlike during orthogonal stimulation, slowly rising stimuli did not produce any excitatory reflex activity. This indicated a difference in jaw reflexes to forces applied in different directions, possibly due to the activation of different receptor types when stimulating the tooth in either the orthogonal or axial directions.

Perceptual channels for the texture of a food

The present study makes a start on characterising the cognitive processes by which physical effects of eating on the senses are transformed into quantitative judgments about perceived characteristics of a food. It was hypothesised that there is a discrete perceptual channel for an aspect of texture sensed during each of the three initial movements of eating a piece of a cookie. The results showed that the force required for initial compression of the surface of the biscuit related to how 'crisp' it was. Scores on 'hard' were sensitive to higher forces being required to bite off a piece. Ratings of crunchiness responded to both amplitude and frequency of the cracks opened up in this heterogeneously structured material during the first crushing of the bitten piece. These findings are being pursued to identify the stimulation patterns more precisely and to measure how the percepts are integrated into judgments of overall texture.

Reflex responses induced by tooth unloading

The reflex response of the masseter muscle to the rapid unloading of a single maxillary incisor tooth was studied. Unloading of a static force of 2 N in the horizontal direction resulted in a short-latency excitation, inhibition, and long-latency excitation of masseter muscle activity occurring at latencies of approximately 13, 20, and 40 ms, respectively, with a corresponding change in bite force occurring slightly later in each case. Following the blocking of periodontal input by the injection of local anesthetic around the stimulated tooth, inhibitory responses were abolished. Therefore, it is concluded that the observed masseteric inhibition was caused by the unloading of periodontal mechanoreceptors and thus that these receptors may contribute to the jaw unloading reflex.

Conditions for excitatory or inhibitory masseteric reflexes elicited by tooth pressure in man

The reflex responses evoked by slowly rising pressure "push' stimuli to an upper lateral incisor tooth in human masseter muscle were studied. Factors such as the preload (the static force applied to the tooth by the stimulus probe before the start of the push stimulus) and the shape of the stimulus wave affected the outcome of the reflex response. When the stimulating probe did not apply preload to the tooth before the push stimulus took place, the force profile exhibited a large fast component as the probe took up the 'slack' in the periodontium. The fast component in the force profile was found to be responsible for inducing the inhibitory reflex (sole inhibitory reflex). When preload was applied, the size of the fast component in the force profile was reduced and the change in force rate became slower and smoother. This slower stimulus profile induced the sole excitatory reflex significantly more often (58% vs 21%) and the sole inhibitory reflex significantly less often (15% vs 52%) than in the experiments that used no preload. The shape of the stimulus wave that drove the stimulus probe was also of importance. Provided that a 0.5-N preload was applied to the tooth, the smoothest stimulus wave induced the sole excitatory reflex most often. Fitting a rubber attachment to the up of the probe made the push-force profile even smoother and thence more successful in inducing the sole excitatory reflex. Furthermore, the rubber tip reduced the possibility of the probe slipping off the tooth due to small and unavoidable movements of the participant's head. It is concluded that the periodontal mechanoreceptors can induce both excitatory and inhibitory reflexes on the jaw closers. The excitatory reflex becomes dominant when a smooth force is applied with preload. The inhibitory reflex becomes dominant when fast-force changes are applied on the tooth and/or no preload is used.