Comparison of clinical and magnetic resonance imaging diagnoses in patients with TMD history

Association between clinical symptoms and MRI image findings in symptomatic temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disease: A systematic review

To evaluate the association between clinical signs and symptoms of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) and magnetic resonance image (MRI) findings in patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMD). Relevant articles on humans over 18 years of age were obtained from five databases (Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar) up to August 2022. Risk of bias assessment was completed using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools. The GRADEpro (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) instrument was applied to assess the level of evidence across studies in a GRADE Summary of Findings table. In total, 22 studies were included in this systematic review. Of these, 11 studies highlighted that joint pain was positively associated with particular MRI findings: joint effusion, bone marrow edema, disk displacement with/without reduction, and condylar erosion. Masticatory muscle pain was found to have a strong positive correlation with disk displacement in four studies. Five studies found no significant association between MRI findings and masticatory muscle pain. Range of motion and MRI findings were examined in six studies. Limited mouth opening was found to be correlated with disk displacement in five studies. Of the 11 studies evaluating the correlation between joint noise and MRI findings, eight reported a significant association between disk displacement and TMJ noise. The results suggested that patients with joint pain and limited range of motion may benefit from MRI. Patients exhibiting primarily muscle pain are unlikely to benefit clinically from MRI. Future studies with improved quality are warranted.

Condylar erosion is predictive of painful closed lock of the temporomandibular joint: a magnetic resonance imaging study

Background

To assess whether magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings of condylar erosion (CE) are predictive of a specific clinical diagnosis of painful closed lock of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ), and to determine the strength of association between CE and types of internal derangement (ID).

Methods

Based upon sample size estimation, this retrospective paired-design study involved 62 patients, aged between 18 and 67 years. Inclusion criteria were the presence of a unilateral clinical diagnosis of arthralgia coexisting with disk displacement without reduction (‘AR and DDwoR/wLO’), assigned according to the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD) Axis I, and the absence of signs and symptoms of TMJ pain and dysfunction on the contralateral TMJ side. Bilateral sagittal and coronal MR images were obtained to establish the prevalence of CE and TMJ ID types of disk displacement with (DDR) and without reduction (DDNR). Logistic regression analysis was used to compute odds ratios for CE and ID types. Confounding variables adjusted for were age, sex, time since pain onset, pain intensity, and type of ID.

Results

In the regression analysis, the MRI items of DDR (p = 0.533) and DDNR (p = 0.204) dropped out as nonsignificant in the diagnostic clinical ‘AR and DDwoR/wLO’ group. Significant increases in the risk of ‘AR and DDwoR’ occurred with CE (3.1:1 odds ratio; p = 0.026). The presence of CE was significantly related to DDNR (adjusted OR = 43.9; p <  0.001).

Conclusions

The data suggest CE as a dominant factor in the definition of painful closed lock of the TMJ, support the view that joint locking needs to be considered as a frequent symptom of osteoarthritis, and emphasize a strong association between the MRI items of CE and DDNR.

Diagnostic correlation between clinical protocols and magnetic resonance findings in temporomandibular disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Our aim was to assess the diagnostic correlation between clinical protocols and magnetic resonance (MRI) findings in temporomandibular disorders (TMDs), including disc displacement with and without reduction (DDwR; DDwoR) and arthralgia.

METHODS

A systematic review performed in two phases according to the PRISMA checklist. Specific indexing terms were used for search of studies assessing TMDs through clinical diagnostic protocols with the aid of Research Diagnostic Criteria for TMDs or Diagnostic Criteria for TMDs. Quality assessment performed using QUADAS-2. Heterogeneity was assessed using I² . Publication bias was assessed using funnel plots. For meta-analysis, we used random effect model or fixed effect. The main outcomes were sensitivity and specificity of clinical protocols.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies included in the qualitative analysis and 11 studies in the meta-analysis. None of the studies fulfilled all criteria of QUADAS-2. High heterogeneity and high publication bias were found among the studies. Clinical protocols for assessing DDwR compared with MRI showed pooled sensitivity of 66% and specificity of 72%. For DDwoR, sensitivity was 61% and specificity 98%. For arthralgia, sensitivity was 43% and specificity 68% for the presence of effusion.

CONCLUSIONS

This review reveals the need for studies with improved quality. Clinical protocols show poor to moderate validity in diagnosis of DDwR and DDwoR compared with MRI. No correlation was found between a clinical diagnosis of arthralgia and MRI effusion. Clinical diagnostic protocols can be used as screening tools, reserving the use of MRI for a more accurate diagnosis in patients with symptoms or dysfunction.

Internal derangement as a predictor of provoked pain on mouth opening: A magnetic resonance imaging study

Purpose

This study investigated the relationship between pain and internal derangement in temporomandibular disorder (TMD) patients using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Materials and Methods

This study analyzed 356 TMD patients (712 temporomandibular joints [TMJs]). The inclusion criteria were the presence of spontaneous or provoked pain on one or both TMJs and having undergone MRI. The patients with provoked pain were divided into 3 groups: pain on palpation, pain on mouth opening, and pain on mastication. MRI was performed using a 1.5-T scanner. T1- and T2-weighted parasagittal and paracoronal images were obtained. According to the findings on the T1-weighted images, another 3 groups were created based on internal derangement: normal, disc displacement with reduction, and disc displacement without reduction. The MRI findings were independently interpreted by 2 experienced oral and maxillofacial radiologists at 2 different times. Statistical analysis was performed by the chi-square test using SPSS (version 12.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

Results

Provoked pain on mouth opening was found to be correlated with internal derangement in TMD patients (P<.05). However, spontaneous pain and provoked pain on palpation or mastication were not associated with internal derangement (P>.05).

Conclusion

These results suggest that internal derangement was a significant predictor of provoked pain on mouth opening.

The value of MRI in patients with temporomandibular joint dysfunction: Correlation of MRI and clinical findings

AIM

To estimate the correlation between the MRI findings and clinical outcomes in patients with temporomandibular joint dysfunction (TMD).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We included 546 female and 248 male patients who were clinically diagnosed with TMD (mean age 38.7 years) and examined by MRI (T1 and T2 weighted images, parasagittal and paracoronal slices). A questionnaire, radiological, and clinical findings were analysed for statistically significant correlations. The analysed parameters included gender, age, disk position, joint degeneration, arthralgia, mouth opening, condyle position and clinical progress.

RESULTS

Of all TMJ's 62% showed physiological disc position, 35% anterior and 3% posterior disc position. Modification of therapy occurred in 20% and alteration of diagnosis was found in 32% of all cases. Anterior disc displacement with reduction showed a specificity of 88% and a sensitivity of 78%, whereas anterior disc displacement without reduction showed a specificity of 84% and a sensitivity of 73%. A significant correlation between disc length, condyle morphology and disc displacement was found. With the increase of intra-articular liquid as seen on MRI the level of arthralgia significantly rose as opposed to mouth opening.

CONCLUSION

Specificity and sensitivity, for anterior disc displacement and osseous changes in TMJ were highly acceptable. Results had confirmed the diagnostic capability of MRI in diagnostic imaging of TMJ. Additionally MRI should be used primarily in severe, therapy-resistant cases and for surgical planning purposes.

Relationship between pain and effusion on magnetic resonance imaging in temporomandibular disorder patients

Purpose

This study was performed to find the relationship between pain and joint effusion using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in temporomandibular disorder (TMD) patients.

Materials and Methods

The study subjects included 232 TMD patients. The inclusion criteria in this study were the presence of spontaneous pain or provoked pain on one or both temporomandibular joints (TMJs). The provoked pain was divided into three groups: pain on palpation (G1), pain on mouth opening (G2), and pain on mastication (G3). MRI examinations were performed using a 1.5-T MRI scanner. T1- and T2-weighted images with para-sagittal and para-coronal images were obtained. According to the T2-weighted image findings, the cases of effusions were divided into four groups: normal, mild (E1), moderate (E2), and marked effusion (E3). A statistical analysis was carried out using the χ² test with SPSS (version 12.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

Results

Spontaneous pain, provoked pain, and both spontaneous and provoked pain were significantly related to joint effusion in TMD patients (p<0.05). However, among the various types of provoked pain, pain on palpation of the masticatory muscles and TMJ (G1) was not related to joint effusion in TMD patients (p>0.05).

Conclusion

Spontaneous pain was related to the MRI findings of joint effusion; however, among the various types of provoked pain, pain on palpation of the masticatory muscles and TMJ was not related to the MRI findings of joint effusion. These results suggest that joint effusion has a significant influence on the prediction of TMJ pain.

Relationship between anterior disc displacement with/without reduction and effusion in temporomandibular disorder patients using magnetic resonance imaging

PURPOSE

This study was performed to evaluate the relationship between anterior disc displacement and effusion in temporomandibular disorder (TMD) patients using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study subjects included 253 TMD patients. MRI examinations were performed using a 1.5 T MRI scanner. T1- and T2-weighted images with para-sagittal and para-coronal images were obtained. According to the MRI findings, temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disc positions were divided into 3 subgroups: normal, anterior disc displacement with reduction (DWR), and anterior disc displacement without reduction (DWOR). The cases of effusion were divided into 4 groups: normal, mild (E1), moderate (E2), and marked effusion (E3). Statistical analysis was made by the Fisher's exact test using SPSS (version 12.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

RESULTS

The subjects consisted of 62 males and 191 females with a mean age of 28.5 years. Of the 253 patients, T1- and T2-weighted images revealed 34 (13.4%) normal, DWR in 103 (40.7%), and DWOR in 116 (45.9%) on the right side and 37 (14.6%) normal, DWR in 94 (37.2%), and DWOR in 122 (48.2%) joints on the left side. Also, T2-images revealed 82 (32.4%) normal, 78 (30.8%) E1, 51 (20.2%) E2, and 42 (16.6%) E3 joints on the right side and 79 (31.2%) normal, 85 (33.6%) E1, 57 (22.5%) E2, and 32 (12.7%) E3 on the left side. There was no difference between the right and left side.

CONCLUSION

Anterior disc displacement was not related to the MRI findings of effusion in TMD patients (P>0.05).

The Diagnostic Validity of Clinical Tests in Temporomandibular Internal Derangement: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To assess the diagnostic validity of clinical tests for temporomandibular internal derangement relative to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

METHODS

MEDLINE and Embase were searched from 1994 through 2009. Independent reviewers conducted study selection; risk of bias was assessed using Quality Assessment of studies of Diagnostic Accuracy included in Systematic reviews (QUADAS); ≥9/14) and data abstraction. Overall quality of evidence was profiled using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE). Agreement was measured using quadratic weighted kappa (κw). Positive (+) or negative (-) likelihood ratios (LR) with 95% CIs were calculated and pooled using the DerSimonian-Laird method and a random-effects model when homogeneous (I(2)≥0.40, Q-test p≤0.10).

RESULTS

We selected 8 of 36 studies identified. There is very low quality evidence that deflection (+LR: 6.37 [95% CI, 2.13-19.03]) and crepitation (LR:5.88 [95% CI, 1.95-17.76]) as single tests and crepitation, deflection, pain, and limited mouth opening as a cluster of tests are the most valuable for ruling in internal derangement without reduction (+LR:6.37 [95% CI, 2.13-19.03]), (-LR:0.27 [95% CI, 0.11-0.64]) while the test cluster click, deviation, and pain rules out internal derangement with reduction (-LR: 0.09 [95% CI, 0.01-0.72]). No single test or cluster of tests was conclusive and of significant value for ruling in internal derangement with reduction.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings of this review will assist clinicians in deciding which diagnostic tests to use when internal derangement is suspected. The literature search revealed a lack of high-quality studies; further research with adequate description of patient populations, blinded assessments, and both sagittal and coronal MRI planes is therefore recommended.

Purpose: To assess the diagnostic validity of clinical tests for temporomandibular internal derangement relative to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Methods: MEDLINE and Embase were searched from 1994 through 2009. Independent reviewers conducted study selection; risk of bias was assessed using Quality Assessment of studies of Diagnostic Accuracy included in Systematic reviews (QUADAS); ≥9/14) and data abstraction. Overall quality of evidence was profiled using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE). Agreement was measured using quadratic weighted kappa (κw). Positive (+) or negative (−) likelihood ratios (LR) with 95% CIs were calculated and pooled using the DerSimonian–Laird method and a random-effects model when homogeneous (I²≥0.40, Q-test p≤0.10). Results: We selected 8 of 36 studies identified. There is very low quality evidence that deflection (+LR: 6.37 [95% CI, 2.13–19.03]) and crepitation (LR:5.88 [95% CI, 1.95–17.76]) as single tests and crepitation, deflection, pain, and limited mouth opening as a cluster of tests are the most valuable for ruling in internal derangement without reduction (+LR:6.37 [95% CI, 2.13–19.03]), (−LR:0.27 [95% CI, 0.11–0.64]) while the test cluster click, deviation, and pain rules out internal derangement with reduction (−LR: 0.09 [95% CI, 0.01–0.72]). No single test or cluster of tests was conclusive and of significant value for ruling in internal derangement with reduction. Conclusions: Findings of this review will assist clinicians in deciding which diagnostic tests to use when internal derangement is suspected. The literature search revealed a lack of high-quality studies; further research with adequate description of patient populations, blinded assessments, and both sagittal and coronal MRI planes is therefore recommended.

Diagnostic accuracy of clinical tests and signs of temporomandibular joint disorders: a systematic review of the literature

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the research on accuracy of individual clinical diagnostic signs and tests for the presence of temporomandibular disorder (TMD), and for the subclassifications affiliated with TMD.

BACKGROUND

Diagnosis of TMD through clinical diagnostic measures has been reported in many studies; however, few of these studies have identified individual clinical tests or signs that can aid in the diagnosis of TMD or differentiate between the subclassifications of TMD.

METHODS

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed for this review. Computerized and hand searches were completed to locate articles on the diagnostic accuracy of clinical tests and signs. To be considered for review, the study required (1) an assessment of individual clinical measures of TMD, (2) a report of the diagnostic accuracy of these measures, and (3) an acceptable reference standard for comparison. Quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy (QUADAS) scores were completed on each selected article. Sensitivity and specificity and negative and positive likelihood ratios were calculated for each diagnostic test described.

RESULTS

The search strategy identified 131 potential articles, which were narrowed down to 7 that met the criteria for this review. After assessment using the QUADAS score, 3 of the 7 articles were of high quality. All 7 studies used tests to differentiate subclassifications of TMD. The 7 studies included (1) diagnostic tests/signs of joint sounds, (2) joint movements, or (3) clinically oriented pain measures. There were no studies that investigated TMD versus a competing, non-TMD condition.

CONCLUSION

Only 3 studies presented in this literature review were of high quality. Because all of the included studies assessed diagnostic accuracy among subclassifications of individuals suspected of having TMD, the ability of any of these tests to distinguish between patients with TMD versus patients without TMD remains unknown. Because of the lack of clear findings indicating compelling evidence for clinical diagnosis of TMD, and because of the low quality of most of these studies, the data are insufficient to support or reject these tests.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnosis, level 2a-.

Evaluation of the lateral pterygoid muscle using magnetic resonance imaging

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study were to evaluate the visibility of the lateral pterygoid muscle (LPM) in temporomandibular joint (TMJ) images obtained by MRI, using different projections and to compare image findings with clinical symptoms of patients with and without temporomandibular disorders (TMD).

METHODS

In this study, LPM images of 50 participants with and without TMDs were investigated by MRI. The images of the LPM in different projections of 100 TMJs from 35 participants (70 TMJs) with and 15 participants (30 TMJs) without clinical signs and symptoms of TMD were visible and analysed.

RESULTS

The oblique sagittal and axial images of the TMJ clearly showed the LPM. Hypertrophy (1.45%), atrophy (2.85%) and contracture (2.85%) were the abnormalities found in the LPM. TMD signs, such as hypermobility (11.4%), hypomobility (12.9%) and disc displacement (20.0%), could be seen in TMJ images. Related clinical symptoms, such as pain (71.4%), articular sounds (30.4%), bruxism (25.7%) and headache (22.9%), were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with TMD can present with alterations in the LPM thickness. Patients without TMD also showed alterations, such as atrophy and contracture, in TMJ images. Recognition of alterations in the LPM will improve our understanding of clinical symptoms and pathophysiology of TMD, and may lead to a more specific diagnosis of these disorders.

Posição habitual de língua e padrão de deglutição em indivíduo com oclusão classe III, pré e pós-cirurgia ortognática

TEMA: os distúrbios miofuncionais orofaciais dos indivíduos que apresentam desproporções maxilomandibulares podem estar relacionados à condição muscular orofacial e às diferentes funções por elas realizadas. PROCEDIMENTOS: a paciente realizou um exame radiográfico de videofluoroscopia no qual se observou quantas deglutições foram necessárias para total limpeza das valéculas e qual foi a posição da língua após a deglutição de saliva. O exame foi realizado com bário líquido e pão de queijo. RESULTADOS: na avaliação pré-operatória, foi encontrada a língua posicionada no soalho da cavidade oral; mastigação com movimento compensatório de língua, com amassamento do alimento pela língua, contra o palato; deglutição com projeção anterior de língua, diminuição da elevação de dorso de língua; elevação de palato mole e laringe adequada; diminuição de ejeção oral para líquido e função de clearance faríngeo completa para líquidos e sólidos. No exame pós-operatório, foi observada a posição habitual de língua em soalho da boca; mastigação com movimento compensatório de língua, com amassamento do alimento pela língua, contra o palato; elevação de palato mole e laringe adequada, ejeção oral satisfatória para líquido e função de clearance faríngeo completo para líquidos e sólidos. CONCLUSÃO: foi observado padrão adaptativo funcional em mastigação e deglutição mantido, mesmo após a cirurgia corretiva para a adequação da deformidade dentofacial, apesar da melhora da força de ejeção oral.